中国农业科技导报 ›› 2023, Vol. 25 ›› Issue (12): 205-215.DOI: 10.13304/j.nykjdb.2023.0055
• 方法与技术创新 • 上一篇
刘融融1,2(), 焦连庆2(
), 张婷2,3, 于敏2, 田义新1
收稿日期:
2023-01-31
接受日期:
2023-03-21
出版日期:
2023-12-15
发布日期:
2023-12-12
通讯作者:
焦连庆
作者简介:
刘融融 E-mail:liurr98x@163.com;
基金资助:
Rongrong LIU1,2(), Lianqing JIAO2(
), Ting ZHANG2,3, Min YU2, Yixin TIAN1
Received:
2023-01-31
Accepted:
2023-03-21
Online:
2023-12-15
Published:
2023-12-12
Contact:
Lianqing JIAO
摘要:
为优化大叶冬青瞬时高温灭菌工艺,分析其对大叶冬青灭菌效果及质量的影响,采用正交试验法,研究灭菌前后大叶冬青1,1-二苯基-2-苦基肼(1,1-Diphenyl-2-picrylhydrazyl, DPPH)自由基清除率及多酚类化合物和皂苷类化合物含量的变化,以灭菌温度、灭菌时间、药材粒度为考察因素,以灭菌率、DPPH自由基清除率、多酚类、皂苷类化合物含量为评价指标,通过权重分析法(criteria importance though intercrieria correlation,CRITIC)确定指标相关性权重并计算综合评分。结果表明,按照综合加权法确定的权重系数是多酚类化合物含量25.78%、皂苷类类化合物含量47.22%、DPPH·清除率26.99%,最佳灭菌工艺条件为:灭菌温度160或170 ℃,灭菌时间10 s,粉碎粒度不大于24目。按优化工艺灭菌后的样品微生物限度检查均符合药典规定;灭菌前后样品的多酚、皂苷类化合物含量及DPPH自由基清除率均无明显变化,且样品多酚、皂苷类化合物的指纹图谱相似度≥0.9。综上所述,瞬时高温灭菌能有效杀灭大叶冬青中的微生物,且对质量无影响。
中图分类号:
刘融融, 焦连庆, 张婷, 于敏, 田义新. 基于CRITIC法优化大叶冬青瞬时高温灭菌工艺[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2023, 25(12): 205-215.
Rongrong LIU, Lianqing JIAO, Ting ZHANG, Min YU, Yixin TIAN. Optimization of Instantaneous High-temperature Sterilization Process Before and After Sterilization of Ilex latifolia Based on CRITIC Method[J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2023, 25(12): 205-215.
编号 Code | A: 灭菌温度 Sterilization temperature/℃ | B: 灭菌时间 Sterilization time/s | C:粉碎粒度/目 Fineness of pulverization/mesh | D: 空白 Blank |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 140 | 5 | 80 | |
2 | 160 | 10 | 24 | |
3 | 180 | 15 | 50 |
表 1 正交因素水平
Table 1 Quadrature level of pilot factor
编号 Code | A: 灭菌温度 Sterilization temperature/℃ | B: 灭菌时间 Sterilization time/s | C:粉碎粒度/目 Fineness of pulverization/mesh | D: 空白 Blank |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 140 | 5 | 80 | |
2 | 160 | 10 | 24 | |
3 | 180 | 15 | 50 |
样品序号 Sample number | A:温度 Temperature/℃ | B:时间 Time/s | C:粒度/目 Fineness/mesh | D:空白 Blank | 灭菌率 Sterilization rate/% |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 140 | 5 | 80 | 88.62 | |
2 | 140 | 10 | 24 | 92.43 | |
3 | 140 | 15 | 50 | 90.29 | |
4 | 160 | 5 | 24 | 95.88 | |
5 | 160 | 10 | 50 | 96.10 | |
6 | 160 | 15 | 80 | 96.83 | |
7 | 180 | 5 | 50 | 96.64 | |
8 | 180 | 10 | 80 | 98.01 | |
9 | 180 | 15 | 24 | 97.97 | |
K1 | 90.447 | 93.713 | 94.487 | 94.230 | |
K2 | 96.270 | 95.513 | 95.472 | 95.300 | |
K3 | 97.540 | 95.030 | 96.343 | 94.727 | |
R | 7.093 | 1.800 | 1.084 | 1.070 |
表2 正交试验的直观分析
Table 2 Direct analysis of orthogonal test
样品序号 Sample number | A:温度 Temperature/℃ | B:时间 Time/s | C:粒度/目 Fineness/mesh | D:空白 Blank | 灭菌率 Sterilization rate/% |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 140 | 5 | 80 | 88.62 | |
2 | 140 | 10 | 24 | 92.43 | |
3 | 140 | 15 | 50 | 90.29 | |
4 | 160 | 5 | 24 | 95.88 | |
5 | 160 | 10 | 50 | 96.10 | |
6 | 160 | 15 | 80 | 96.83 | |
7 | 180 | 5 | 50 | 96.64 | |
8 | 180 | 10 | 80 | 98.01 | |
9 | 180 | 15 | 24 | 97.97 | |
K1 | 90.447 | 93.713 | 94.487 | 94.230 | |
K2 | 96.270 | 95.513 | 95.472 | 95.300 | |
K3 | 97.540 | 95.030 | 96.343 | 94.727 | |
R | 7.093 | 1.800 | 1.084 | 1.070 |
方差来源 Soruce of variation | 离差平方和 Sum of square | 自由度 df | 方差 Variance | F值 F value |
---|---|---|---|---|
A:温度Temperature | 85.839 | 2 | 42.920 | 49.898* |
B:时间 Time | 5.207 | 2 | 2.604 | 3.027 |
C:粒度Fineness | 2.078 | 2 | 1.039 | 1.208 |
误差Error | 8.040 | 2 | 4.020 |
表3 正交试验的方差分析
Table 3 Variance analysis of orthogonal test
方差来源 Soruce of variation | 离差平方和 Sum of square | 自由度 df | 方差 Variance | F值 F value |
---|---|---|---|---|
A:温度Temperature | 85.839 | 2 | 42.920 | 49.898* |
B:时间 Time | 5.207 | 2 | 2.604 | 3.027 |
C:粒度Fineness | 2.078 | 2 | 1.039 | 1.208 |
误差Error | 8.040 | 2 | 4.020 |
图1 10种多酚类及6种皂苷类化合物对照品的色谱峰注:1—新绿原酸;2—绿原酸;3—隐绿原酸;4—咖啡酸;5—对羟基肉桂酸;6—芦丁;7—异槲皮素;8—异绿原酸B;9—异绿原酸A;10—异绿原酸C;11—大叶冬青皂苷F;12—大叶冬青皂苷 H;13—大叶冬青皂苷C;14—苦丁茶冬青皂苷E;15—大叶冬青皂苷D;16—苦丁冬青皂苷F。
Fig. 1 Comparison peaks of 10 polyphenols and 6 saponinsNote:1—Neochlorogenicacid; 2—Chlorogenicacid; 3—Cryptochlorogenicacid; 4—Caffeicacid; 5—P-hydroxycinnamicacid; 6—Rutin; 7—Isoquercitrin 8—IsochlorogenicacidB; 9—Isochlorogenicacid A; 10—Isochlorogenicacid C; 11—Phyllosaponin F; 12—Phyllosaponin H; 13—Phyllosaponin C; 14—Phyllobutein E; 15—Phyllobutein D; 16—Phyllobutein F.
多酚类 Polyphenol | 样品Sample | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1号 No. 1 | 2号 No.2 | 3号 No.3 | 4号 No.4 | 5号 No.5 | 6号 No.6 | 7号 No.7 | 8号 No.8 | 9号 No.9 | |
新绿原酸 Neochlorogenic acid | 0.081 6 | 0.067 1 | 0.070 9 | 0.079 9 | 0.073 0 | 0.073 4 | 0.071 2 | 0.075 1 | 0.077 9 |
绿原酸 Chlorogenic acid | 0.263 6 | 0.223 2 | 0.246 6 | 0.268 0 | 0.238 8 | 0.247 1 | 0.239 5 | 0.245 1 | 0.255 0 |
隐绿原酸 Cryptochlorogenic acid | 0.100 9 | 0.087 5 | 0.091 0 | 0.106 3 | 0.096 4 | 0.096 4 | 0.093 1 | 0.098 1 | 0.099 2 |
咖啡酸 Caffeic acid | 0.00 18 | 0.001 8 | 0.000 7 | 0.000 7 | 0.003 7 | 0.001 3 | 0.000 8 | 0.001 0 | 0.000 8 |
对羟基肉桂酸 P-hydroxycinnamic acid | 0.002 4 | 0.002 5 | 0.001 6 | 0.002 1 | 0.004 7 | 0.001 8 | 0.001 7 | 0.002 7 | 0.001 4 |
芦丁 Rutin | 0.104 0 | 0.138 4 | 0.122 3 | 0.158 3 | 0.141 5 | 0.128 2 | 0.126 9 | 0.125 3 | 0.126 0 |
异槲皮素 Isoquercetin | 0.010 1 | 0.014 1 | 0.011 0 | 0.014 5 | 0.015 7 | 0.012 4 | 0.012 0 | 0.012 7 | 0.012 3 |
异绿原酸B Isochlorogenic acid B | 0.009 4 | 0.005 3 | 0.008 7 | 0.005 6 | 0.009 3 | 0.008 4 | 0.008 7 | 0.010 8 | 0.009 8 |
异绿原酸A Isochlorogenic acid A | 0.082 4 | 0.066 9 | 0.085 9 | 0.074 0 | 0.073 3 | 0.082 0 | 0.076 8 | 0.075 5 | 0.076 5 |
异绿原酸C Isochlorogenic acid C | 0.045 7 | 0.056 7 | 0.072 2 | 0.065 4 | 0.066 5 | 0.072 7 | 0.064 6 | 0.068 0 | 0.071 7 |
总量 Total content | 0.701 8 | 0.663 5 | 0.711 0 | 0.774 9 | 0.722 9 | 0.723 7 | 0.695 3 | 0.714 4 | 0.730 6 |
表4 大叶冬青中10种多酚类化合物含量 (%)
Table 4 Contents of 10 polyphenolic compounds in Ilex latifolia
多酚类 Polyphenol | 样品Sample | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1号 No. 1 | 2号 No.2 | 3号 No.3 | 4号 No.4 | 5号 No.5 | 6号 No.6 | 7号 No.7 | 8号 No.8 | 9号 No.9 | |
新绿原酸 Neochlorogenic acid | 0.081 6 | 0.067 1 | 0.070 9 | 0.079 9 | 0.073 0 | 0.073 4 | 0.071 2 | 0.075 1 | 0.077 9 |
绿原酸 Chlorogenic acid | 0.263 6 | 0.223 2 | 0.246 6 | 0.268 0 | 0.238 8 | 0.247 1 | 0.239 5 | 0.245 1 | 0.255 0 |
隐绿原酸 Cryptochlorogenic acid | 0.100 9 | 0.087 5 | 0.091 0 | 0.106 3 | 0.096 4 | 0.096 4 | 0.093 1 | 0.098 1 | 0.099 2 |
咖啡酸 Caffeic acid | 0.00 18 | 0.001 8 | 0.000 7 | 0.000 7 | 0.003 7 | 0.001 3 | 0.000 8 | 0.001 0 | 0.000 8 |
对羟基肉桂酸 P-hydroxycinnamic acid | 0.002 4 | 0.002 5 | 0.001 6 | 0.002 1 | 0.004 7 | 0.001 8 | 0.001 7 | 0.002 7 | 0.001 4 |
芦丁 Rutin | 0.104 0 | 0.138 4 | 0.122 3 | 0.158 3 | 0.141 5 | 0.128 2 | 0.126 9 | 0.125 3 | 0.126 0 |
异槲皮素 Isoquercetin | 0.010 1 | 0.014 1 | 0.011 0 | 0.014 5 | 0.015 7 | 0.012 4 | 0.012 0 | 0.012 7 | 0.012 3 |
异绿原酸B Isochlorogenic acid B | 0.009 4 | 0.005 3 | 0.008 7 | 0.005 6 | 0.009 3 | 0.008 4 | 0.008 7 | 0.010 8 | 0.009 8 |
异绿原酸A Isochlorogenic acid A | 0.082 4 | 0.066 9 | 0.085 9 | 0.074 0 | 0.073 3 | 0.082 0 | 0.076 8 | 0.075 5 | 0.076 5 |
异绿原酸C Isochlorogenic acid C | 0.045 7 | 0.056 7 | 0.072 2 | 0.065 4 | 0.066 5 | 0.072 7 | 0.064 6 | 0.068 0 | 0.071 7 |
总量 Total content | 0.701 8 | 0.663 5 | 0.711 0 | 0.774 9 | 0.722 9 | 0.723 7 | 0.695 3 | 0.714 4 | 0.730 6 |
皂苷 Saponin | 样品Sample | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1号 No.1 | 2号 No.2 | 3号 No.3 | 4号 No.4 | 5号 No.5 | 6号 No.6 | 7号 No.7 | 8号 No.8 | 9号 No.9 | |
大叶皂苷F Saponin F | 0.276 8 | 0.315 2 | 0.321 5 | 0.283 0 | 0.330 0 | 0.278 5 | 0.317 4 | 0.282 2 | 0.254 7 |
大叶皂苷H Saponin H | 0.182 6 | 0.189 0 | 0.169 5 | 0.148 3 | 0.178 9 | 0.202 3 | 0.179 0 | 0.189 8 | 0.126 8 |
大叶皂苷C Saponin C | 0.432 4 | 0.504 2 | 0.495 5 | 0.410 7 | 0.490 8 | 0.472 7 | 0.493 0 | 0.462 9 | 0.370 0 |
苦丁皂苷E Butoxoside E | 0.109 3 | 0.135 9 | 0.100 2 | 0.093 9 | 0.110 8 | 0.122 8 | 0.120 3 | 0.111 4 | 0.090 0 |
大叶皂苷D Saponin D | 0.018 8 | 0.022 9 | 0.019 0 | 0.015 8 | 0.019 7 | 0.019 3 | 0.021 8 | 0.018 2 | 0.013 5 |
苦丁皂苷F Butyroside F | 0.090 3 | 0.110 8 | 0.104 2 | 0.090 2 | 0.115 9 | 0.101 8 | 0.110 3 | 0.092 5 | 0.085 6 |
总量 Total content | 1.110 1 | 1.278 0 | 1.209 8 | 1.041 9 | 1.247 1 | 1.197 3 | 1.241 9 | 1.156 9 | 0.940 6 |
表5 大叶冬青中6种皂苷类化合物含量 (%)
Table 5 Contents of 6 kinds of saponins in Ilex latifolia
皂苷 Saponin | 样品Sample | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1号 No.1 | 2号 No.2 | 3号 No.3 | 4号 No.4 | 5号 No.5 | 6号 No.6 | 7号 No.7 | 8号 No.8 | 9号 No.9 | |
大叶皂苷F Saponin F | 0.276 8 | 0.315 2 | 0.321 5 | 0.283 0 | 0.330 0 | 0.278 5 | 0.317 4 | 0.282 2 | 0.254 7 |
大叶皂苷H Saponin H | 0.182 6 | 0.189 0 | 0.169 5 | 0.148 3 | 0.178 9 | 0.202 3 | 0.179 0 | 0.189 8 | 0.126 8 |
大叶皂苷C Saponin C | 0.432 4 | 0.504 2 | 0.495 5 | 0.410 7 | 0.490 8 | 0.472 7 | 0.493 0 | 0.462 9 | 0.370 0 |
苦丁皂苷E Butoxoside E | 0.109 3 | 0.135 9 | 0.100 2 | 0.093 9 | 0.110 8 | 0.122 8 | 0.120 3 | 0.111 4 | 0.090 0 |
大叶皂苷D Saponin D | 0.018 8 | 0.022 9 | 0.019 0 | 0.015 8 | 0.019 7 | 0.019 3 | 0.021 8 | 0.018 2 | 0.013 5 |
苦丁皂苷F Butyroside F | 0.090 3 | 0.110 8 | 0.104 2 | 0.090 2 | 0.115 9 | 0.101 8 | 0.110 3 | 0.092 5 | 0.085 6 |
总量 Total content | 1.110 1 | 1.278 0 | 1.209 8 | 1.041 9 | 1.247 1 | 1.197 3 | 1.241 9 | 1.156 9 | 0.940 6 |
样品序号 Sample number | A:温度 Temperature/℃ | B:时间 Time/s | C:粒度/目 Fineness/mesh | D:空白 Blank | 综合得分 Synthesis score |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 160 | 5 | 80 | 0.91 | |
2 | 160 | 10 | 24 | 0.96 | |
3 | 160 | 15 | 50 | 0.95 | |
4 | 170 | 5 | 24 | 0.91 | |
5 | 170 | 10 | 50 | 0.97 | |
6 | 170 | 15 | 80 | 0.94 | |
7 | 180 | 5 | 50 | 0.94 | |
8 | 180 | 10 | 80 | 0.93 | |
9 | 180 | 15 | 24 | 0.86 | |
K1 | 0.940 | 0.920 | 0.927 | 0.913 | |
K2 | 0.940 | 0.953 | 0.910 | 0.947 | |
K3 | 0.910 | 0.917 | 0.953 | 0.930 | |
R | 0.030 | 0.036 | 0.043 | 0.034 |
表6 正交试验的直观分析
Table 6 Direct analysis of orthogonal test
样品序号 Sample number | A:温度 Temperature/℃ | B:时间 Time/s | C:粒度/目 Fineness/mesh | D:空白 Blank | 综合得分 Synthesis score |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 160 | 5 | 80 | 0.91 | |
2 | 160 | 10 | 24 | 0.96 | |
3 | 160 | 15 | 50 | 0.95 | |
4 | 170 | 5 | 24 | 0.91 | |
5 | 170 | 10 | 50 | 0.97 | |
6 | 170 | 15 | 80 | 0.94 | |
7 | 180 | 5 | 50 | 0.94 | |
8 | 180 | 10 | 80 | 0.93 | |
9 | 180 | 15 | 24 | 0.86 | |
K1 | 0.940 | 0.920 | 0.927 | 0.913 | |
K2 | 0.940 | 0.953 | 0.910 | 0.947 | |
K3 | 0.910 | 0.917 | 0.953 | 0.930 | |
R | 0.030 | 0.036 | 0.043 | 0.034 |
方差来源 Soruce of variation | 离差平方和 Sum of square | 自由度 df | 方差 Variance | F值F value | P值P value |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
A: 温度Temperature | 0.002 | 2 | 0.001 | 1.080 | >0.05 |
B: 时间Time | 0.002 | 2 | 0.001 | 1.480 | >0.05 |
C: 粒度Fineness | 0.003 | 2 | 0.001 | 1.720 | >0.05 |
误差Error | 0.002 | 2 | 0.001 |
表7 正交试验的方差分析
Table 7 Variance analysis of orthogonal test
方差来源 Soruce of variation | 离差平方和 Sum of square | 自由度 df | 方差 Variance | F值F value | P值P value |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
A: 温度Temperature | 0.002 | 2 | 0.001 | 1.080 | >0.05 |
B: 时间Time | 0.002 | 2 | 0.001 | 1.480 | >0.05 |
C: 粒度Fineness | 0.003 | 2 | 0.001 | 1.720 | >0.05 |
误差Error | 0.002 | 2 | 0.001 |
指标Index | 处理Treatment | 1批 NO.1 | 2批 NO.2 | 3批 NO.3 | 平均 Mean | 标准差 SD |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
多酚类含量 Polyphenols content/% | 灭菌前Before sterilization | 0.618 5 | 0.610 6 | 0.621 5 | 0.616 9 | 0.005 6 |
灭菌后After sterilization | 0.724 0 | 0.714 9 | 0.731 2 | 0.723 4 | 0.008 2 | |
皂苷类含量 Saponins content/% | 灭菌前Before sterilization | 1.256 1 | 1.164 8 | 1.313 4 | 1.244 8 | 0.074 9 |
灭菌后After sterilization | 1.261 4 | 1.1863 | 1.410 7 | 1.286 1 | 0.114 2 | |
DPPH自由基清除率 DPPH·clearance/% | 灭菌前Before sterilization | 87.98 | 88.2 | 88.54 | 88.24 | 0.282 1 |
灭菌后After sterilization | 89.42 | 88.91 | 89.75 | 89.36 | 0.423 2 |
表8 灭菌前后DPPH自由基清除率及多酚、皂苷类化合物含量
Table 8 DPPH· clearance and polyphenolic, saponins content before and after sterilization
指标Index | 处理Treatment | 1批 NO.1 | 2批 NO.2 | 3批 NO.3 | 平均 Mean | 标准差 SD |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
多酚类含量 Polyphenols content/% | 灭菌前Before sterilization | 0.618 5 | 0.610 6 | 0.621 5 | 0.616 9 | 0.005 6 |
灭菌后After sterilization | 0.724 0 | 0.714 9 | 0.731 2 | 0.723 4 | 0.008 2 | |
皂苷类含量 Saponins content/% | 灭菌前Before sterilization | 1.256 1 | 1.164 8 | 1.313 4 | 1.244 8 | 0.074 9 |
灭菌后After sterilization | 1.261 4 | 1.1863 | 1.410 7 | 1.286 1 | 0.114 2 | |
DPPH自由基清除率 DPPH·clearance/% | 灭菌前Before sterilization | 87.98 | 88.2 | 88.54 | 88.24 | 0.282 1 |
灭菌后After sterilization | 89.42 | 88.91 | 89.75 | 89.36 | 0.423 2 |
指标Index | 条件Condition | F值F value | P值P value | t值t value | 自由度df |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
多酚类含量 Polyphenols content | 假定等方差Assumed equal variance | 0.264 | 0.635 | -18.593 | 4.000 |
不假定等方差Equivariance is not assumed | -18.593 | 3.551 | |||
皂苷类含量 Saponins content | 假定等方差Assumed equal variance | 0.654 | 0.464 | -0.524 | 4.000 |
不假定等方差Equivariance is not assumed | -0.524 | 3.453 | |||
DPPH自由基清除率 DPPH·clearance | 假定等方差Assumed equal variance | 0.471 | 0.530 | -3.814 | 4.000 |
不假定等方差Equivariance is not assumed | -3.814 | 3.485 |
表9 灭菌前后DPPH自由基清除率及多酚、皂苷类化合物含量的方差分析
Table 9 Variance analysis of DPPH· clearance and polyphenolic, saponins content before and after sterilization
指标Index | 条件Condition | F值F value | P值P value | t值t value | 自由度df |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
多酚类含量 Polyphenols content | 假定等方差Assumed equal variance | 0.264 | 0.635 | -18.593 | 4.000 |
不假定等方差Equivariance is not assumed | -18.593 | 3.551 | |||
皂苷类含量 Saponins content | 假定等方差Assumed equal variance | 0.654 | 0.464 | -0.524 | 4.000 |
不假定等方差Equivariance is not assumed | -0.524 | 3.453 | |||
DPPH自由基清除率 DPPH·clearance | 假定等方差Assumed equal variance | 0.471 | 0.530 | -3.814 | 4.000 |
不假定等方差Equivariance is not assumed | -3.814 | 3.485 |
图2 灭菌样品的多酚类化合物HPLC指纹图谱注:R—对照图谱;S1—未灭菌样品;S2~S10—灭菌后样品。1—新绿原酸;2—绿原酸;3—隐绿原酸;4—咖啡酸;5—对羟基肉桂酸;6—芦丁;7—异槲皮素;8—异绿原酸B;9—异绿原酸A;10—异绿原酸C。
Fig. 2 HPLC fingerprint of polyphenolic compounds in sterilized samplesNote:R—Control map; S1—Unsterilized sample; S2~S10—Sterilized samples.Note:1—Neochlorogenic acid; 2—Chlorogenic acid; 3—Cryptochlorogenic acid; 4—Caffeic acid; 5—P-hydroxycinnamic acid; 6—Rutin;7—Isoquercitrin; 8—Isochlorogenic acid B; 9—Isochlorogenic acid A; 10—Isochlorogenic acid C.
图3 灭菌样品皂苷类化合物的HPLC指纹图谱注:R—对照图谱;S1—未灭菌样品;S2~S10—灭菌后样品。1—大叶冬青皂苷F;2—大叶冬青皂苷H;3—大叶冬青皂苷C;4—苦丁茶冬青皂苷E;5—大叶冬青皂苷D;6—苦丁冬青皂苷F。
Fig. 3 HPLC fingerprint of saponins in sterilized sampleNote:R—Control map; S1—Unsterilized sample; S2~S10—Sterilized samples. 1—Phyllosaponin F; 2—Phyllosaponin H; 3—Phyllosaponin C; 4—Phyllobutein E; 5—Phyllobutein D; 6—Phyllobutein F.
1 | 冯琳琳. 苦丁茶冬青及大叶冬青的质量控制研究[D]. 长春: 吉林大学, 2017. |
FENG L L. Study on the quality control of llex Kudingcha and llex larifolia [D]. Changchun: Jilin University, 2017. | |
2 | 汪健仁. 茶与代用茶抗氧化能力及其主要成分比较[J].中国茶叶, 2020, 42(3): 44-47. |
WANG J R. Comparison of antioxidant capacity and main components of tea and other special tea [J]. China Tea, 2020, 42(3): 44-47. | |
3 | 张现珠, 王潇潇, 陈贵杰, 等. 大叶苦丁茶多糖的研究进展[J]. 中国茶叶加工, 2022(1): 49-57. |
ZHANG X Z, WANG X X, CHEN G J, et al.. Research progress in large leaf Kudingcha polysaccharides [J]. China Tea Process., 2022(1): 49-57. | |
4 | 陈颖, 王存琴, 方兰婷, 等. 大叶冬青质量控制方法的研究进展[J]. 中国林副产, 2022(2): 77-80. |
CHEN Y, WANG C Q, FANG L T, et al.. Research progress on the quality control methods of Ilex latifolia [J]. 2022(2): 77-80. | |
5 | SHI Q X, JIN S N, XIANG X L, et al.. The metabolic change in serum lysoglycerophospholipids intervened by triterpenoid saponins from Kuding tea on hyperlipidemic mice [J]. Food Funct., 2019, 10(12): 7782-7792. |
6 | WANG C Q, WANG R B, CHEN Y, et al.. Discovery of an EGFG tyrosine kinase inhibitor from Ilex latifolia in breast cancer therapy [J]. Bioorganic Med. Chem. Letters, 2019, 29(11): 1282-1290. |
7 | YUAN Y, PAN S, YANG S, et al.. Antioxidant and cardioprotective effects of Ilex cornuta on myocardial ischemia injury [J]. Chin. J. Nat. Med., 2017, 15(2): 94-104. |
8 | ZHANGT T, HU T, JIANG J G, et al.. Antioxidant and anti-inflammatory effects of polyphenols extracted from Ilex latifolia Thunb [J/OL]. RSC Adv., 2018, 8(13): 13569F [2023-01-03]. . |
9 | 关玥. 大叶冬青化学成分及其与蛋白质相互作用机理研究[D]. 长春: 吉林农业大学, 2017. |
GUAN Y. Studies on the chemical components of Ilex latifolia Thunb. and its interaction with proteins [D]. Changchun: Jilin Agricultural University, 2017. | |
10 | 康超超, 王学成, 伍振峰, 等. 基于物理化学及生物评价的中药生药粉灭菌技术研究进展[J]. 中草药, 2020, 51(2): 507-515. |
KANG C C, WANG X C, WU Z F, et al.. Research progress on sterilization technology of Chinese materia medica powder based on physicochemical and biological [J]. Chin. Trad. Herbal Drugs Eval., 2020, 51(2): 507-515. | |
11 | 林彤, 毕福钧, 吕渭升, 等. 中药的辐照灭菌现状与监管[J]. 中国药学杂志, 2019, 54(17): 1442-1447. |
LIN T, BI F J, LYU W S, et al.. Status and control of radicidation of tranditional Chinese medicine [J]. Chin. Pharmaceutical J., 2019, 54(17):1442-1447. | |
12 | CHOI J I, KIM J K, SRINIVASAN P, et al.. Comparison of gamma ray and electron beam irradiation on extraction yield, morphological and antioxidant properties of polysaccharides from tamarind seed [J]. Radiation Physics Chem., 2009, 78(7-8): 605-609. |
13 | 杨明龙. 苦荞皮层粉灭菌工艺及通便功效研究[D]. 广州: 华南理工大学, 2019. |
YANG M L. Study on sterilization technology anddefecation efficacy of tartary buckwheat skin powder [D]. Guangzhou: South China University of Technology, 2019. | |
14 | 张冠坤. HTST智能灭菌系统在啤酒生产中的应用[J]. 食品安全导刊, 2022(13): 153-155. |
ZHANG G K. Application of HTST intelligent sterilization system in beer production [J]. China Food Safety Magazine, 2022(13): 153-155. | |
15 | XU X X, DENG J J, LUO D S, et al.. Comparative study of high hydrostatic pressure and high temperature short time processing on quality of clear and cloudy Se-enriched kiwifruit juices [J]. Innov. Food Sci. Emerg. Technol., 2018, 49: 168-170. |
16 | 周颖, 黄锐. 超高温瞬时灭菌工艺优化[J]. 中国乳业, 2020(2): 81-84. |
17 | SUCUPIRA N R, WURLITZER N, DIONISIO A, et al.. Effect of sulphite and uht sterilization parameters in the coconut water quality [J]. Chem. Eng. Trans. (CET), 2015, 44: 79-84. |
18 | 国家食品药品监督管理局.已上市中药药学变更研究技术指导原则[Z]. 2020. |
19 | 尚海宾, 陶海涛, 乔晓芳. 中药高温瞬时灭菌设备的智能化设计与性能确认[J]. 流程工业, 2022(7): 58-61. |
20 | 徐远芳, 彭玲, 李鹏辉, 等. 基于谱效分析评价电子束辐照灭菌对山银花药材质量的影响[J]. 核农学报, 2022, 36(4): 745-753. |
XU Y F, PENG L, LI P H, et al.. Evaluation on the quality of Lonicerae flos of electron beam rradiation sterilization based on spectrum-effect analysis [J]. J. Nucl. Agric. Sci., 2022, 36(4): 745-753. | |
21 | 王存琴, 陈颖, 汪雷, 等. HPLC法同时测定大叶冬青叶中6种有效成分的含量[J]. 中药新药与临床药理, 2019, 30(4): 466-471. |
WANG C Q, CHEN Y, WANG L, et al.. Simultaneous determination of six components in Ilex latifolia leaves by HPLC [J]. Trad. Chin. Drug Res. Clinical Pharmacol., 2019, 30(4): 466-471. | |
22 | 姚兰, 焦安妮, 冯琳琳, 等. 大叶冬青药材的黄嘌呤氧化酶抑制作用的谱效关系研究[J]. 中草药, 2018, 49(20): 4838-4843. |
YAO L, JIAO A N, FENG L L, et al.. Spectrum-activity relationship of extract from Ilex latifolia on inhibition of xanthine oxidase [J]. Chin. Trad. Herbal Drugs, 2018, 49(20): 4838-4843. | |
23 | 王存琴, 陈颖, 汪雷 等. HPLC同时测定大叶冬青叶中10种多酚成分的含量及抗氧化活性研究[J]. 天然产物研究与开发, 2019, 31(4): 557-565. |
WANG C Q, CHEN Y, WANG L, et al.. Determination of 10 polyphenol components by HPLC and antioxidant activity in the leaves of Ilex latifolia [J]. Nat. Prod. Res. Dev., 2019, 31(4): 557-565. | |
24 | 赵婷婷, 何承辉, 谭梅娥, 等. 基于多指标权重分析和单因素-正交实验优选前列爽颗粒醇提工艺[J]. 化学与生物工程, 2020, 37(12): 45-50. |
ZHAO T T, HE C H, TAN M E, et al.. Optimization in ethanol extraction process of Oianlieshuang granules based on multi-lndex weight analysis and single factor-orthodona experiments [J]. Chem. Bioeng., 2020, 37(12): 45-50. | |
25 | 崔琳琳, 冯巧巧, 曹玲, 等. 覆盆子生药粉湿热灭菌工艺优化及不同灭菌方式对质量影响研究[J]. 药物评价研究, 2022, 45(5): 918-925. |
CUI L L, FENG Q Q, CAO L, et al.. Optimization of moist heat sterilization technology for Rubus chingil and quality impact research for different sterilization methods [J]. Drug Evaluation Res., 2022, 45(5): 918-925. | |
26 | 武娜, 张利红, 万露 等. 丹参微波灭菌工艺优化及评价[J]. 解放军药学学报, 2015, 31(4): 288-290. |
WU N, ZHANG L H, WAN L, et al.. Optimization and evaluation of microwave sterilization technology of Salvia miltiorrhiza Bunge [J]. Pharm. J. Chin. PLA, 2015, 31(4): 288-290. |
[1] | 卢登洋, 王鑫, 唐章虎, 吴翠云, 蒲云峰, 闫敏, 鲍荆凯, 姜喜. 梨果实发育过程中酚类物质组成及抗氧化活性比较[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2023, 25(9): 97-104. |
[2] | 梁兆超,郭显炜,宋艳娟,马填富,汪锋,王丽艳,荆瑞勇*. 响应面法优化双孢蘑菇多糖提取工艺及其体外抗氧化活性研究[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2019, 21(8): 161-168. |
[3] | 杨三维1§,田鹏2§,李刘军1,芦冬涛3,乔玲1,赵佳佳1,乔麟轶3,葛川3,郑军1*,张建诚1*. 紫小麦花色苷的提取及其抗氧化和肿瘤抑制研究[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2018, 20(5): 1-8. |
[4] | 赵建京,范志红,周威. 红小豆保健功能研究进展[J]. , 2009, 11(3): 46-50. |
阅读次数 | ||||||
全文 |
|
|||||
摘要 |
|
|||||