Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology ›› 2023, Vol. 25 ›› Issue (11): 207-217.DOI: 10.13304/j.nykjdb.2022.0417
• BIO-MANUFACTURING & RESOURCE AND ECOLOGY • Previous Articles
Yajuan WEI1,2(), Jing GUO3, Yunhu XIE1(
), Xiangfei WANG4, Shan JIN5
Received:
2022-05-08
Accepted:
2022-07-23
Online:
2023-11-15
Published:
2023-11-20
Contact:
Yunhu XIE
魏亚娟1,2(), 郭靖3, 解云虎1(
), 王项飞4, 金山5
通讯作者:
解云虎
作者简介:
魏亚娟 E-mail:2404336139@qq.com;
基金资助:
CLC Number:
Yajuan WEI, Jing GUO, Yunhu XIE, Xiangfei WANG, Shan JIN. Study on Branching Architecture of Clipping Hedysarum scoparium in Desert-oasis Ecotone of Jilantai[J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2023, 25(11): 207-217.
魏亚娟, 郭靖, 解云虎, 王项飞, 金山. 吉兰泰荒漠-绿洲过渡带平茬花棒枝系构型特征[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2023, 25(11): 207-217.
立地类型 Site type | 建植密度/(株·hm-2) Planting density/(plant·hm-2) | 基径 Base diameter/mm | 1级分枝数Primary branch number | 灌木层盖度Shrub coverage/% | 草本层盖度 Herb coverage/% | 草本植物种 Herbaceous species | 数量 Number |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
丘顶 Hilltop | 3 333 | 30.27±8.09 | 7.94±2.35 | 54.12±13.79 | 3.28±1.59 | 兴安虫实 Corispermum chinganicum | 1 |
平缓沙地 Gentle land | 3 333 | 32.91±6.11 | 8.85±2.78 | 63.33±12.47 | 8.07±3.28 | 白莎蒿、雾冰黎、兴安虫实、隐子草Artemisia blepharolepis,Bassia dasyphylla,Corispermum chinganicum,Cleistogenes squarrosa | 4 |
丘间低地 Interdune lowland | 3 333 | 36.35±9.37 | 8.09±3.23 | 84.57±17.96 | 5.66±1.97 | 兴安虫实、隐子草 Corispermum chinganicum,Cleistogenes squarrosa | 2 |
Table 1 Basic information of Hedysarum scoparium plantationin different site types
立地类型 Site type | 建植密度/(株·hm-2) Planting density/(plant·hm-2) | 基径 Base diameter/mm | 1级分枝数Primary branch number | 灌木层盖度Shrub coverage/% | 草本层盖度 Herb coverage/% | 草本植物种 Herbaceous species | 数量 Number |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
丘顶 Hilltop | 3 333 | 30.27±8.09 | 7.94±2.35 | 54.12±13.79 | 3.28±1.59 | 兴安虫实 Corispermum chinganicum | 1 |
平缓沙地 Gentle land | 3 333 | 32.91±6.11 | 8.85±2.78 | 63.33±12.47 | 8.07±3.28 | 白莎蒿、雾冰黎、兴安虫实、隐子草Artemisia blepharolepis,Bassia dasyphylla,Corispermum chinganicum,Cleistogenes squarrosa | 4 |
丘间低地 Interdune lowland | 3 333 | 36.35±9.37 | 8.09±3.23 | 84.57±17.96 | 5.66±1.97 | 兴安虫实、隐子草 Corispermum chinganicum,Cleistogenes squarrosa | 2 |
立地类型 Site type | 黏粒 Clay | 粉粒 Silt | 极细砂 Very fine sand | 细砂 Fine sand | 中砂 Medium sand | 粗砂 Coarse sand | 极粗砂 Very coarse sand | 砾石Gravel |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
丘顶Hilltop | 0 | 0.00±0.00 c | 5.63±1.36 b | 43.68±2.96 a | 33.86±3.13 a | 13.65±2.18 a | 2.42±1.21 a | 0 |
平缓沙地Gentle land | 0 | 0.13±0.03 b | 5.25±1.17 b | 44.53±1.67 a | 34.23±2.75 a | 13.64±0.66 a | 1.23±0.59 b | 0 |
丘间低地Interdune lowland | 0 | 0.25±0.02 a | 7.80±1.12 a | 44.13±1.79 a | 34.08±0.50 a | 13.40±2.19 a | 0.34±0.23 c | 0 |
Table 2 Mechanical composition of 0 —100 cm soil in different site types
立地类型 Site type | 黏粒 Clay | 粉粒 Silt | 极细砂 Very fine sand | 细砂 Fine sand | 中砂 Medium sand | 粗砂 Coarse sand | 极粗砂 Very coarse sand | 砾石Gravel |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
丘顶Hilltop | 0 | 0.00±0.00 c | 5.63±1.36 b | 43.68±2.96 a | 33.86±3.13 a | 13.65±2.18 a | 2.42±1.21 a | 0 |
平缓沙地Gentle land | 0 | 0.13±0.03 b | 5.25±1.17 b | 44.53±1.67 a | 34.23±2.75 a | 13.64±0.66 a | 1.23±0.59 b | 0 |
丘间低地Interdune lowland | 0 | 0.25±0.02 a | 7.80±1.12 a | 44.13±1.79 a | 34.08±0.50 a | 13.40±2.19 a | 0.34±0.23 c | 0 |
Fig. 2 Morphological characteristics of clipping Hedysarum scoparium in different site typesNote: Different lowercase letters indicate significant differences among different site types at P<0.05 level.
Fig. 3 Biomass distribution characteristics of clipping Hedysarum scoparium in different site typesNote: Different lowercase letters indicate significant differences among different site types at P<0.05 level.
立地类型Site type | 总体分枝率 OBR | 1级分枝数 N1 | 最高级分枝数 Ns | 枝系总数 NT |
---|---|---|---|---|
丘顶Hilltop | 0.30±0.22 a | 9.50±2.07 a | 999.07±304.03 ab | 1 339.32±338.53 a |
平缓沙地Gentle land | 0.27±0.10 a | 9.89±3.10 a | 568.80±416.97 b | 780.29±474.89 a |
丘间低地Interdune lowland | 0.20±0.04 a | 10.57±2.06 a | 1 115.00±460.40 a | 1 379.32±527.99 a |
Table 3 Total branching rate of clipping Hedysarum scopariumin different site types
立地类型Site type | 总体分枝率 OBR | 1级分枝数 N1 | 最高级分枝数 Ns | 枝系总数 NT |
---|---|---|---|---|
丘顶Hilltop | 0.30±0.22 a | 9.50±2.07 a | 999.07±304.03 ab | 1 339.32±338.53 a |
平缓沙地Gentle land | 0.27±0.10 a | 9.89±3.10 a | 568.80±416.97 b | 780.29±474.89 a |
丘间低地Interdune lowland | 0.20±0.04 a | 10.57±2.06 a | 1 115.00±460.40 a | 1 379.32±527.99 a |
立地类型 Site type | 1级分枝数N1 | 2级分枝数N2 | 3级分枝数N3 | 1、2级分枝率 Grade 1 and grade 2 bifurcation ratio (SBR1∶2) | 2、3级分枝率 Grade 2 and grade 3 bifurcation ratio (SBR2∶3) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
丘顶Hilltop | 9.50±2.07 a | 322.75±41.63 a | 999.07±204.03 ab | 0.05±0.01 a | 0.53±0.26 a |
平缓沙地Gentle land | 9.89±3.10 a | 171.67±21.15 b | 568.80±216.97 b | 0.07±0.03 a | 0.40±0.19 a |
丘间低地Interdune lowland | 10.57±2.06 a | 253.75±82.67 ab | 1 115.00±360.40 a | 0.06±0.02 a | 0.24±0.06 b |
Table 4 Number and stepwise bifurcation ratio of clipping Hedysarum scopariumin different site types
立地类型 Site type | 1级分枝数N1 | 2级分枝数N2 | 3级分枝数N3 | 1、2级分枝率 Grade 1 and grade 2 bifurcation ratio (SBR1∶2) | 2、3级分枝率 Grade 2 and grade 3 bifurcation ratio (SBR2∶3) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
丘顶Hilltop | 9.50±2.07 a | 322.75±41.63 a | 999.07±204.03 ab | 0.05±0.01 a | 0.53±0.26 a |
平缓沙地Gentle land | 9.89±3.10 a | 171.67±21.15 b | 568.80±216.97 b | 0.07±0.03 a | 0.40±0.19 a |
丘间低地Interdune lowland | 10.57±2.06 a | 253.75±82.67 ab | 1 115.00±360.40 a | 0.06±0.02 a | 0.24±0.06 b |
立地类型 Site type | 1级分枝长 L1/cm | 2级分枝长 L2/cm | 3级分枝长L3/cm | 1级分枝 径粗D1/mm | 2级分枝 径粗D2/mm | 3级分枝 径粗D3/mm | 1、2级枝茎比Branch diameter ratio of grade 1 and 2(RBD2∶1) | 2、3级枝茎比Branch diameter ratio of grade 2 and 3(RBD3∶2) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
丘顶 Hilltop | 140.75±28.32 b | 74.50±37.68 a | 39.00±7.83 b | 9.70±1.05 b | 5.60±1.18 a | 5.06±0.76 a | 0.52±0.08 a | 0.88±0.13 a |
平缓沙地 Gentle land | 158.33±34.57 ab | 77.67±16.53 a | 39.61±6.29 b | 8.80±1.55 b | 4.41±1.52 a | 2.39±0.17 a | 0.50±0.25 a | 0.55±0.19 b |
丘间低地 Interdune lowland | 199.25±61.27 a | 101.5±20.82 a | 70.00±9.09 a | 14.00±0.82 a | 5.07±1.06 a | 3.19±0.90 a | 0.41±0.04 a | 0.58±0.15 b |
Table 5 Branch diameter ratio ofclipping Hedysarum scoparium in different site types
立地类型 Site type | 1级分枝长 L1/cm | 2级分枝长 L2/cm | 3级分枝长L3/cm | 1级分枝 径粗D1/mm | 2级分枝 径粗D2/mm | 3级分枝 径粗D3/mm | 1、2级枝茎比Branch diameter ratio of grade 1 and 2(RBD2∶1) | 2、3级枝茎比Branch diameter ratio of grade 2 and 3(RBD3∶2) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
丘顶 Hilltop | 140.75±28.32 b | 74.50±37.68 a | 39.00±7.83 b | 9.70±1.05 b | 5.60±1.18 a | 5.06±0.76 a | 0.52±0.08 a | 0.88±0.13 a |
平缓沙地 Gentle land | 158.33±34.57 ab | 77.67±16.53 a | 39.61±6.29 b | 8.80±1.55 b | 4.41±1.52 a | 2.39±0.17 a | 0.50±0.25 a | 0.55±0.19 b |
丘间低地 Interdune lowland | 199.25±61.27 a | 101.5±20.82 a | 70.00±9.09 a | 14.00±0.82 a | 5.07±1.06 a | 3.19±0.90 a | 0.41±0.04 a | 0.58±0.15 b |
指标 Index | 土壤水分 Soil moisture | 土壤温度 Soil temperature | 空气温度 Air temperature | 粉粒 Silt | 极细砂 Very fine sand | 细砂 Fine sand | 中砂Medium sand | 粗砂 Coarse sand | 极粗砂 Very coarse sand | 株高 Plant height | 冠幅 Crown size | 1级分枝数 Number of primary branches | 基径 Base diameter |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
土壤温度 Soil temperature | -0.604** | ||||||||||||
空气温度 Air temperature | 0.642** | -0.290 | |||||||||||
粉粒Silt | 0.685** | 0.446* | 0.075 | ||||||||||
极细砂 Very fine sand | 0.390* | 0.330 | -0.023 | 0.505** | |||||||||
细砂 Fine sand | 0.302 | -0.193 | 0.151 | 0.198 | 0.681** | ||||||||
中砂 Medium sand | 0.016 | -0.144 | -0.085 | -0.457* | -0.895** | -0.661** | |||||||
粗砂 Coarse sand | -0.346 | 0.198 | -0.093 | -0.260 | -0.551** | -0.944** | 0.479* | ||||||
极粗砂 Very coarse sand | -0.351* | -0.195 | -0.022 | 0.112 | 0.002 | -0.180 | -0.371 | 0.249 | |||||
株高 Plant height | 0.568* | 0.032 | 0.498 | 0.516* | 0.112 | 0.142 | -0.069 | -0.214 | -0.163 | ||||
冠幅 Crown size | 0.191 | 0.384 | 0.582* | 0.321 | -0.101 | -0.078 | 0.069 | 0.023 | -0.100 | 0.548* | |||
1级分枝数 Number of primary branches | 0.433* | 0.502* | -0.332 | 0.152 | -0.071 | -0.196 | 0.126 | 0.175 | -0.087 | -0.088 | 0.254 | ||
基径 Base diameter | 0.557* | -0.036 | 0.419 | 0.194 | -0.044 | -0.095 | 0.077 | 0.036 | -0.121 | 0.712** | 0.377 | -0.017 | |
地上生物量 Aboveground biomass | 0.681** | 0.895** | 0.551* | 0.685** | 0.390* | 0.302 | 0.016 | -0.346 | -0.351* | 0.452* | 0.521* | 0.324 | 0.500* |
Table 6 Growth of clipping Hedysarum scoparium in relation to climate and soil factors
指标 Index | 土壤水分 Soil moisture | 土壤温度 Soil temperature | 空气温度 Air temperature | 粉粒 Silt | 极细砂 Very fine sand | 细砂 Fine sand | 中砂Medium sand | 粗砂 Coarse sand | 极粗砂 Very coarse sand | 株高 Plant height | 冠幅 Crown size | 1级分枝数 Number of primary branches | 基径 Base diameter |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
土壤温度 Soil temperature | -0.604** | ||||||||||||
空气温度 Air temperature | 0.642** | -0.290 | |||||||||||
粉粒Silt | 0.685** | 0.446* | 0.075 | ||||||||||
极细砂 Very fine sand | 0.390* | 0.330 | -0.023 | 0.505** | |||||||||
细砂 Fine sand | 0.302 | -0.193 | 0.151 | 0.198 | 0.681** | ||||||||
中砂 Medium sand | 0.016 | -0.144 | -0.085 | -0.457* | -0.895** | -0.661** | |||||||
粗砂 Coarse sand | -0.346 | 0.198 | -0.093 | -0.260 | -0.551** | -0.944** | 0.479* | ||||||
极粗砂 Very coarse sand | -0.351* | -0.195 | -0.022 | 0.112 | 0.002 | -0.180 | -0.371 | 0.249 | |||||
株高 Plant height | 0.568* | 0.032 | 0.498 | 0.516* | 0.112 | 0.142 | -0.069 | -0.214 | -0.163 | ||||
冠幅 Crown size | 0.191 | 0.384 | 0.582* | 0.321 | -0.101 | -0.078 | 0.069 | 0.023 | -0.100 | 0.548* | |||
1级分枝数 Number of primary branches | 0.433* | 0.502* | -0.332 | 0.152 | -0.071 | -0.196 | 0.126 | 0.175 | -0.087 | -0.088 | 0.254 | ||
基径 Base diameter | 0.557* | -0.036 | 0.419 | 0.194 | -0.044 | -0.095 | 0.077 | 0.036 | -0.121 | 0.712** | 0.377 | -0.017 | |
地上生物量 Aboveground biomass | 0.681** | 0.895** | 0.551* | 0.685** | 0.390* | 0.302 | 0.016 | -0.346 | -0.351* | 0.452* | 0.521* | 0.324 | 0.500* |
1 | 何明珠,张景光,王辉.荒漠植物枝系构型影响因素分析[J].中国沙漠,2006,26(4):625-630. |
HE M Z, ZHANG J G, WANG H. Analysis of branching architecture factors of desert plants [J]. J. Desert Res., 2006,26(4):625-630. | |
2 | 屈志强,刘连友,吕艳丽.沙生植物构型及其与抗风蚀能力关系研究综述[J].生态学杂志,2011,30(2):357-362. |
QU Z Q, LIU L Y, LYU Y L. Psammophyte architecture and its relations with anti-wind erosion capability: a review [J]. Chin. J. Ecol., 2011,30(2):357-362. | |
3 | HALLE F, OLDEMAN R A A, TOMLINSON P B. Tropical Trees and Forests. An Architectural Analysis) [M]. New York: Springger-Verlag, 1978:1-442. |
4 | 张志浩,杨晓东,孙宝伟,等.浙江天童太白山不同群落植物构型比较[J].生态学报,2015,35(3):761-769. |
ZHANG Z H, YANG X D, SUN B W, et al.. Comparison of plant architecture among communities in taibai mountain of Tiantong region,Zhejiang province [J]. Acta Ecol. Sin.,2015,35(3):761-769. | |
5 | 王泽,阿不都克玉木·米吉提,吐尔逊娜依·热依木,等.北疆荒漠区梭梭水分、盐分和养分状况研究[J].新疆农业大学学报,2014,37(4):339-344. |
WANG Z, MIJITI A, REYIMU T, et al.. Research on nutrients, salinity and moisture contents of Haloxylon ammodendron trees in northern Xinjiang deserts [J]. J. Xinjiang Agric. Univ., 2014,37(4):339-344. | |
6 | 许强,杨自辉,郭树江,等.梭梭不同生长阶段的枝系构型特征[J].西北林学院学报,2013,28(4):50-54. |
XU Q, YANG Z H, GUO S J, et al.. Branch system configuration features of Haloxylon ammodendron in different growth stages [J]. J. Northwest For. Univ.,2013,28(4):50-54. | |
7 | 孙栋元,赵成义,王丽娟,等.荒漠植物构型研究进展[J].水土保持研究,2011,18(5):281-287. |
SUN D Y, ZHAO C Y, WANG L J, et al.. Progress in the study on architecture of desert plants [J]. Soil Water Conserv. Res., 2011,18(5): 281-287. | |
8 | 海小伟,李毅,谢燕飞.2种生境下红砂枝系构型特征[J].安徽农业科学,2017,45(12):1-4, 11. |
HAI X W, LI Y, XIE Y F. Plant architecture characteristics of Reaumuria soongorica in two different ecological habits [J]. J. Anhui Agric. Sci., 2017,45(12):1-4, 11. | |
9 | 何丙辉,钟章成.不同环境胁迫下银杏构件种群药用成分变化的研究[J].西南大学学报(自然科学版),2003,25(1):7-10. |
HE B H, ZHONG Z C. Study on variation dynamics of modular population of the changes of Ginkgo biloba under different conditions of environmental stresses [J]. J. Southwest Univ.(Nat. Sci. ),2003,25(1):7-10. | |
10 | 翟德苹,陈林,杨明秀,等.荒漠草原不同生长年限中间锦鸡儿灌丛枝系构型特征[J].浙江大学学报(农业与生命科学版),2015,41(3):340-348. |
ZHAI D P, CHEN L, YANG M X, et al.. Branching architectures of Caragana intermedia at different ages in desert steppe areas [J]. J. Zhejiang Univ. (Agric. Life Sci.),2015,41(3):340-348. | |
11 | 魏亚娟,汪季,党晓宏,等.沙生灌木平茬效应研究[J].北方园艺,2019(6):116-124. |
WEI Y J, WANG J, DANG X H, et al.. A review of researches on rejuvenation effects of sandy shrubs [J]. Northern Hortic.,2019(6):116-124. | |
12 | 于秀立,吕新华,刘红玲,等.天然和人工种植胡杨植冠的构型分析[J].生态学杂志,2016,35(1):32-40. |
YU X L, LYU X H, LIU H L, et al.. Architectural analysis of crown geometry of Populus euphratica in original and artificial habitats [J]. Chin. J. Ecol.,2016,35(1):32-40. | |
13 | 周资行,李真,焦健,等.腾格里沙漠南缘唐古特白刺克隆分株生长格局及枝系构型分析[J].草业学报,2014,23(1):12-21. |
ZHOU Z X, LI Z, JIAO J, et al.. Analysis of clonal growth patterns and branching architecture of Nitraria tangutorum clonal ramet in the Southern margin area of the Tengger desert [J]. Acta Phytoecol. Sin.,2014,23(1):12-21. | |
14 | 史红娟. 古尔班通古特沙漠南缘不同生境下梭梭枝系构型特征研究[D].石河子:石河子大学,2015. |
SHI H J.Plant architecture characteristics of Haloxylon ammodendron atdifferent ecological habits in the south edge of gurbantunggut desert [D]. Shihezi: Shihezi Unversity, 2015. | |
15 | 袁秀英,袁登胜,白玉明.固定和半固定沙丘花棒克隆生长构型的比较研究[J].西北林学院学报,2006,21(6):32-34, 37. |
YUAN X Y, YUAN D S, BAI Y M. A study on the patterns of clone growth of Hedysarum scoparium on fixed dunes [J]. J. Northwest For. Univ., 2006,21 (6):32-34, 37. | |
16 | 王林龙,刘明虎,李清河,等.不同生境半日花(Helianthemum songaricum)植物构型特征[J].中国沙漠,2016,36(3):651-658. |
WANG L L, LIU M H, LI Q H, et al.. Architecture characteristics of Helianthemum songaricum under different habitats [J]. J. Desert Res., 2016,36(3):651-658. | |
17 | 陈波,宋永昌,达良俊.木本植物的构型及其在植物生态学研究的进展[J].生态学杂志,2002,21(3):52-56, 28. |
CHEN B, SONG Y C, DA L J. Woody plant architecture and its research in plant ecology [J]. Chin. J. Ecol.,2002,21(3):52-56, 28. | |
18 | 吕洪丽. 花棒土壤微生物和土壤酶活性的研究[D].呼和浩特:内蒙古农业大学,2009. |
LYU H L. Study on soil microbes and soil enzyme activity of Hedysarum scoparium Fish. Et Mey. [D]. Hohhot: Inner Mongolia Agricultural University, 2009. | |
19 | 刘海跃,李欣玫,张琳琳,等.西北荒漠带花棒根际丛枝菌根真菌生态地理分布[J].植物生态学报,2018,42(2):252-260. |
LIU H Y, LI X M, ZHANG L L, et al.. Eco-geographical distribution of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi associated with Hedysarum scoparium in the desert zone of northwestern China [J]. Chin. J. Plant Ecol.,2018,42(2):252-260. | |
20 | 田佳,曹兵,及金楠,等.防风固沙灌木花棒沙柳根系生物力学特性[J].农业工程学报,2014,30(23):192-198. |
TIAN J, CAO B, JI J N, et al.. Biomechanical characteristics of root systems of Hedysarum scoparium and Salix psammophila [J]. Trans. Chin. Soc. Agric. Eng.,2014,30(23):192-198. | |
21 | 郭自春,曾凡江,刘波,等.灌溉量对2种灌木光合特性和水分利用效率的影响[J].中国沙漠,2014,34(2):448-455. |
GUO Z C, ZENG F J, LIU B, et al.. Effects of irrigations on photosynthetic characteristic and water use efficiency of Calligonum mongolicum and Hedysarum scoparium [J]. J. Desert Res.,2014,34(2):448-455. | |
22 | 贾玉奎,罗凤敏,张景波,等.乌兰布和荒漠生态系统12种沙生灌木苗期的抗旱性[J].水土保持通报,2015,35(5):95-99, 105. |
JIA Y K, LUO F M, ZHANG J B, et al.. Drought resistance of twelve desert shrubs at seedling stage in Ulan Buh desert ecosystem [J]. Bull. Soil Water Conserv.,2015,35(5):95-99, 105. | |
23 | 高兴天.灌木构型与其积沙效能关系研究[D].兰州:甘肃农业大学,2018. |
GAO X T. Study on relationship between shrub configuration and its sand accumulation efficiency [D]. Lanzhou: Gansu Agricultural University,2018. | |
24 | 刘虎俊.仿真固沙灌木构型参数及防风固沙效应研究[D].兰州:甘肃农业大学,2012. |
LIU H J. The study on architecture and wind break efficiency of imitation sand-fixed shrub [D]. Lanzhou:Gansu Agricultural University,2012. | |
25 | 陶冶,张元明.荒漠灌木生物量多尺度估测——以梭梭为例[J].草业学报,2013,22(6):1-10. |
TAO Y, ZHANG Y M. Multi-scale biomass estimation of desert shrubs:a case study of Haloxylon ammodendron in the Gurbantunggut desert, China [J]. Acta Pratac. Sin.,,2013,22(6):1-10. | |
26 | 宋国慧. 沙漠湖盆区地下水生态系统及植被生态演替机制研究[D].西安:长安大学,2012. |
SONG G H. Study on groundwater dependent ecosystem and ecological mechanisms of vegetation succession in desert Lake-basin region [D]. Xi’an: Chang’an University,2012. | |
27 | 李宇,徐新文,许波,等.塔里木沙漠公路防护林乔木状沙拐枣平茬复壮技术的研究[J].干旱区资源与环境,2014,28(2):103-108. |
LI Y, XU X W, XU B, et al.. Cutting rejuvenation technologies for Calligonum arborescens shelter belt along the Tarim desert highway [J]. J. Arid Land Resour. Environ.,2014,28(2):103-108. | |
28 | 肖遥,陶冶,张元明.古尔班通古特沙漠4种荒漠草本植物不同生长期的生物量分配与叶片化学计量特征[J].植物生态学报,2014,38(9):929-940. |
XIAO Y, TAO Y, ZHANG Y M. Biomass allocation and leaf stoichiometric characteristics in four desert herbaceous plants during different growth periods in the Gurbantünggüt desert, China [J]. Chin. J. Plant Ecol.,2014,38(9):929-940. | |
29 | 魏亚娟,党晓宏,汪季,等.枝条覆盖对平茬花棒生长特征和浅层土壤水分的影响[J].生态学报,2020,40(3):931-939. |
WEI Y J, DANG X H, WANG J, et al.. Effects of branch mulch on growth characteristics and surface soil moisture of clipping Hedysarum scoparium [J]. Acta Ecol. Sin.,2020,40(3):931-939. | |
30 | 王宁,陈浩,董莹莹,等.土壤水分对入侵植物节节麦表型可塑性和化感作用的影响[J].草地学报,2018,26(2):402-408. |
WANG N, CHEN H, DONG Y Y, et al.. Effects of soil-water conditions on morphological plasticity and allelopathic potential of invasive plant Aegilops tauschii Coss [J]. Acta Agrestia Sin.,2018,26(2):402-408. | |
31 | 任杰,赵成章,赵夏纬,等.金塔绿洲荒漠交错带沙蓬根系分形特征[J].生态学报,2020,40(15):5298-5305. |
REN J, ZHAO C Z, ZHAO X W, et al.. Fractal characteristics of Agriophyllum squarrosum roots in desert-oasis ecotone in Jinta county, Gansu province [J]. Acta Ecol. Sin.,2020,40(15):5298-5305. | |
32 | 胡晓静,张文辉,何景峰.秦岭南坡栓皮栎实生苗的构型分析[J].林业科学,2015,51(9):157-164. |
HU X J, ZHANG W H, HE J F. Architectural analysis of Quercus variabilis seedlings in the south slopes of Qinling mountains [J]. Sci. Silvae Sin.,2015,51(9):157-164. | |
33 | 王艳丹,张梦寅,范建成,等.金沙江干热河谷银合欢人工林的土壤水分变化特征[J].热带生物学报,2018,9(1):61-68. |
WANG Y D, ZHANG M Y, FAN J C, et al.. Soil moisture of Leucaena leucocephala plantations in the dry-hot valley of Jinsha river, Yunnan [J]. J. Trop. Biol.,2018,9(1):61-68. | |
34 | 周学雅,杨婷婷,王安志,等.科尔沁沙地沙丘-丘间低地降雨前后土壤水分分布特征[J].生态学杂志,2017,36(1):157-163. |
ZHOU X Y, YANG T T, WANG A Z, et al.. Soil water distribution before and after a rainfall event at sand dune-interdunes Horqin sandy land,Northern China [J]. Chin. J. Ecol., 2017,36(1):157-163. | |
35 | 薛峰,江源,王明昌,等.芦芽山针叶林分布上下限土壤温度及含水量的季节差异[J].生态学报,2020,40(1):1-10. |
XUE F, JIANG Y, WANG M C, et al.. Seasonal changes in soil temperature and water content at the upper and lower limits of coniferous forest on Luya mountain, China [J]. Acta Ecol. Sin.,2020,40(1):1-10. | |
36 | 杨梅学,姚檀栋,何元庆.青藏高原土壤水热分布特征及冻融过程在季节转换中的作用[J].山地学报,2002,20(5):553-558. |
YANG M X, YAO T D, HE Y Q. The role of soil moisture-energy distribution and melting-freezing processes on seasonal shift in Tibetan plateau [J]. J. Mountain Sci.,2002,20(5):553-558. |
No related articles found! |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||