Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology ›› 2022, Vol. 24 ›› Issue (7): 58-68.DOI: 10.13304/j.nykjdb.2021.0422
• BIOTECHNOLOGY & LIFE SCIENCE • Previous Articles Next Articles
Xiaxia LI(), Siyu ZHANG, Zhihui CHENG(
)
Received:
2021-05-18
Accepted:
2021-07-26
Online:
2022-07-15
Published:
2022-08-15
Contact:
Zhihui CHENG
通讯作者:
程智慧
作者简介:
李夏夏 E-mail:Lixiaxia@nwafu.edu.cn;
基金资助:
CLC Number:
Xiaxia LI, Siyu ZHANG, Zhihui CHENG. Regional Trial Evaluation of High Quality Garlic Cultivars of China[J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2022, 24(7): 58-68.
李夏夏, 张思语, 程智慧. 中国优质大蒜品种区域试验评价[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2022, 24(7): 58-68.
播种季节 Sowing season | 品种编号 Cultivars number | 品种名称 Cultivars name | 来源 Origin |
---|---|---|---|
春播 Spring sowing | 甘05 Gan 05 | 甘州四六瓣 Ganzhousiliuban | 甘肃甘州 Ganzhou, Gansu |
新09 Xin 09 | 新疆吉木萨尔白皮 Xinjiangjimusaerbaipi | 新疆吉木萨尔 Jimusaer, Xinjiang | |
黑01 Hei 01 | 阿城紫皮 Achengzipi | 黑龙江阿城 Acheng, Heilongjiang | |
黑02 Hei 02 | 宁安紫皮 Ninganzipi | 黑龙江宁安 Ningan, Heilongjiang | |
晋01 Jin 01 | 榆次长凝蒜 Yucichangningsuan | 山西榆次 Yuci, Shanxi | |
青02 Qing 02 | 乐都老蒜 Ledulaosuan | 青海乐都 Ledu,Qinghai | |
辽01 Liao 01 | 海城紫皮 Haichengzipi | 辽宁海城 Haicheng, Liaoning | |
秋播 Autumn sowing | G024 | 改良蒜 Gailiangsuan | 陕西杨凌 Yangling, Shaanxi |
G025 | 兴平白皮 Xingpingbaipi | 陕西杨凌 Yangling, Shaanxi | |
川01 Chuan 01 | 二季早 Erjizao | 四川彭州 Pengzhou, Sichuan | |
川02 Chuan 02 | 正月早 Zhengyuezao | 四川彭州 Pengzhou, Sichuan | |
川03 Chuan 03 | 温二早 Wenerzao | 四川德阳 Deyang, Sichuan | |
贵01 Gui 01 | 毕节红蒜 Bijiehongsuan | 贵州毕节 Bijie, Guizhou | |
贵02 Gui 02 | 务川红蒜 Wuchuanhongsuan | 贵州务川 Wuchuan, Guizhou | |
贵03 Gui 03 | 麻江红蒜 Majianghongsuan | 贵州麻江 Majiang, Guizhou | |
贵04 Gui 04 | 威宁大蒜 Weiningdasuan | 贵州威宁 Weining, Guizhou | |
皖01 Wan 01 | 亳州早熟蒜 Bozhouzaoshusuan | 安徽亳州 Bozhou, Anhui |
Table 1 Germplasm information of garlic regional trial
播种季节 Sowing season | 品种编号 Cultivars number | 品种名称 Cultivars name | 来源 Origin |
---|---|---|---|
春播 Spring sowing | 甘05 Gan 05 | 甘州四六瓣 Ganzhousiliuban | 甘肃甘州 Ganzhou, Gansu |
新09 Xin 09 | 新疆吉木萨尔白皮 Xinjiangjimusaerbaipi | 新疆吉木萨尔 Jimusaer, Xinjiang | |
黑01 Hei 01 | 阿城紫皮 Achengzipi | 黑龙江阿城 Acheng, Heilongjiang | |
黑02 Hei 02 | 宁安紫皮 Ninganzipi | 黑龙江宁安 Ningan, Heilongjiang | |
晋01 Jin 01 | 榆次长凝蒜 Yucichangningsuan | 山西榆次 Yuci, Shanxi | |
青02 Qing 02 | 乐都老蒜 Ledulaosuan | 青海乐都 Ledu,Qinghai | |
辽01 Liao 01 | 海城紫皮 Haichengzipi | 辽宁海城 Haicheng, Liaoning | |
秋播 Autumn sowing | G024 | 改良蒜 Gailiangsuan | 陕西杨凌 Yangling, Shaanxi |
G025 | 兴平白皮 Xingpingbaipi | 陕西杨凌 Yangling, Shaanxi | |
川01 Chuan 01 | 二季早 Erjizao | 四川彭州 Pengzhou, Sichuan | |
川02 Chuan 02 | 正月早 Zhengyuezao | 四川彭州 Pengzhou, Sichuan | |
川03 Chuan 03 | 温二早 Wenerzao | 四川德阳 Deyang, Sichuan | |
贵01 Gui 01 | 毕节红蒜 Bijiehongsuan | 贵州毕节 Bijie, Guizhou | |
贵02 Gui 02 | 务川红蒜 Wuchuanhongsuan | 贵州务川 Wuchuan, Guizhou | |
贵03 Gui 03 | 麻江红蒜 Majianghongsuan | 贵州麻江 Majiang, Guizhou | |
贵04 Gui 04 | 威宁大蒜 Weiningdasuan | 贵州威宁 Weining, Guizhou | |
皖01 Wan 01 | 亳州早熟蒜 Bozhouzaoshusuan | 安徽亳州 Bozhou, Anhui |
试验点 Trial site | 品种 Cultivar | 产量 Yield/(kg·m-2) | 大蒜素 Allicin/(mg·g-1) | 可溶性蛋白 Soluble protein/(mg·g-1) | 可溶性糖 Soluble sugar/% | 锗 Germanium/(μg·kg-1) | 硒 Selenium/ (μg·kg-1) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
山西大同 Datong, Shanxi | 甘05 Gan 05 | 1.59±0.07 a | 8.50±0.36 a | 19.41±1.35 ab | 64.66±4.29 c | 1.23±0.06 ab | 92.07±4.23 a |
新09 Xin 09 | 0.63±0.03 d | 8.39±0.10 a | 26.04±1.23 a | 77.61±4.59 abc | 1.32±0.05 a | 61.62±3.12 bc | |
黑02 Hei 02 | 1.08±0.05 bc | 8.83±0.61 a | 16.72±2.11 ab | 83.24±3.03 ab | 0.78±0.08 b | 70.54±5.03 b | |
黑01 Hei 01 | 0.93±0.04 bcd | 4.99±0.18 bc | 18.30±1.06 ab | 89.61±2.55 a | 0.72±0.09 b | 62.60±1.26 bc | |
辽01 Liao 01 | 0.93±0.03 bcd | 6.97±0.44 abc | 21.18±2.34 ab | 72.45±3.87 abc | 1.28±0.10 ab | 46.07±1.36 c | |
青02 Qing 02 | 0.77±0.02 d | 7.00±0.98 ab | 19.39±2.33 ab | 78.86±4.00 abc | 1.06±0.06 ab | 68.46±2.26 b | |
晋01 Jin 01 | 1.29±0.05 bc | 4.57±0.26 c | 14.94±1.02 b | 67.30±3.65 bc | 0.92±0.02 ab | 61.30±3.54 bc | |
均值 Mean | 1.03 | 7.03 | 19.43 | 76.25 | 1.04 | 66.09 | |
变幅 Range | 0.63~1.59 | 4.57~8.83 | 14.94~26.04 | 64.66~89.61 | 0.72~1.32 | 46.07~92.07 | |
变异系数 Coefficient of variation/% | 31.54 | 24.27 | 18.26 | 11.55 | 23.35 | 21.00 | |
青海西宁 Xining, Qinghai | 甘05 Gan 05 | 1.32±0.02 bc | 6.56±0.21 bc | 21.85±2.21 a | 70.98±2.10 b | 0.73±0.11 b | 71.89±5.39 ab |
新09 Xin 09 | 1.39±0.08 a | 6.29±0.23 bc | 15.25±1.69 b | 80.54±2.24 a | 1.08±0.05 ab | 67.90±1.09 ab | |
黑02 Hei 02 | 1.11±0.13 bc | 8.60±0.77 a | 22.65±2.36 a | 74.35±2.18 ab | 1.09±0.07 ab | 70.11±2.10 ab | |
黑01 Hei 01 | 1.16±0.05 bc | 5.53±0.24 c | 20.53±1.97 ab | 73.69±1.68 ab | 0.96±0.04 ab | 72.09±0.99 a | |
辽01 Liao 01 | 1.01±0.03 c | 6.87±0.63 abc | 15.83±0.96 b | 77.94±3.46 ab | 0.99±0.12 ab | 69.34±2.16 ab | |
青02 Qing 02 | 1.63±0.08 a | 7.72±0.10 ab | 16.59±1.13 b | 71.37±2.48 b | 1.09±0.06 ab | 68.04±3.49 ab | |
晋01 Jin 01 | 1.30±0.02 abc | 7.53±0.32 abc | 16.38±1.45 b | 73.07±1.69 ab | 1.23±0.07 a | 58.96±0.98 b | |
均值 Mean | 1.27 | 7.02 | 18.44 | 74.56 | 1.02 | 68.33 | |
变幅 Range | 1.01~1.63 | 5.53~8.60 | 15.25~22.65 | 70.98~80.54 | 0.73~1.23 | 58.96~72.09 | |
变异系数 Coefficient of variation/% | 16.19 | 14.54 | 16.92 | 4.68 | 15.09 | 6.52 | |
陕西太白 Taibai, Shaanxi | 甘05 Gan 05 | 1.07±0.05 a | 10.41±0.36 a | 22.91±1.98 a | 75.98±2.71 bc | 0.84±0.05 b | 86.56±3.69 b |
新09 Xin 09 | 0.37±0.03 c | 6.18±0.10 c | 14.85±0.77 b | 90.69±2.87 a | 1.30±0.12 ab | 84.17±2.14 b | |
黑02 Hei 02 | 1.00±0.04 ab | 7.21±0.52 bc | 21.51±2.16 a | 81.85±2.62 ab | 1.14±0.07 ab | 61.53±1.06 c | |
黑01 Hei 01 | 0.78±0.05 b | 8.24±0.53 abc | 22.62±2.01 a | 65.02±2.61 c | 0.72±0.05 b | 63.51±3.15 c | |
辽01 Liao 01 | 1.04±0.06 ab | 6.47±0.70 c | 18.84±1.95 a | 80.49±3.61 ab | 1.51±0.07 a | 63.97±2.38 c | |
青02 Qing 02 | 0.99±0.06 ab | 9.23±0.66 ab | 22.51±2.26 a | 69.27±3.39 bc | 1.37±0.04 ab | 64.41±5.49 c | |
晋01 Jin 01 | 0.89±0.06 ab | 7.88±0.38 bc | 20.84±2.25 a | 80.71±2.54 ab | 1.46±0.07 a | 107.81±4.20 a | |
均值 Mean | 0.88 | 7.95 | 18.80 | 77.72 | 1.19 | 75.99 | |
变幅 Range | 0.37~1.07 | 6.18~10.41 | 14.85~22.91 | 65.02~90.69 | 0.72~1.51 | 61.53~107.81 | |
变异系数 Coefficient of variation/% | 27.79 | 18.97 | 15.36 | 10.99 | 25.88 | 23.01 |
Table 2 Comparison of garlic varieties in spring sowing area trial
试验点 Trial site | 品种 Cultivar | 产量 Yield/(kg·m-2) | 大蒜素 Allicin/(mg·g-1) | 可溶性蛋白 Soluble protein/(mg·g-1) | 可溶性糖 Soluble sugar/% | 锗 Germanium/(μg·kg-1) | 硒 Selenium/ (μg·kg-1) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
山西大同 Datong, Shanxi | 甘05 Gan 05 | 1.59±0.07 a | 8.50±0.36 a | 19.41±1.35 ab | 64.66±4.29 c | 1.23±0.06 ab | 92.07±4.23 a |
新09 Xin 09 | 0.63±0.03 d | 8.39±0.10 a | 26.04±1.23 a | 77.61±4.59 abc | 1.32±0.05 a | 61.62±3.12 bc | |
黑02 Hei 02 | 1.08±0.05 bc | 8.83±0.61 a | 16.72±2.11 ab | 83.24±3.03 ab | 0.78±0.08 b | 70.54±5.03 b | |
黑01 Hei 01 | 0.93±0.04 bcd | 4.99±0.18 bc | 18.30±1.06 ab | 89.61±2.55 a | 0.72±0.09 b | 62.60±1.26 bc | |
辽01 Liao 01 | 0.93±0.03 bcd | 6.97±0.44 abc | 21.18±2.34 ab | 72.45±3.87 abc | 1.28±0.10 ab | 46.07±1.36 c | |
青02 Qing 02 | 0.77±0.02 d | 7.00±0.98 ab | 19.39±2.33 ab | 78.86±4.00 abc | 1.06±0.06 ab | 68.46±2.26 b | |
晋01 Jin 01 | 1.29±0.05 bc | 4.57±0.26 c | 14.94±1.02 b | 67.30±3.65 bc | 0.92±0.02 ab | 61.30±3.54 bc | |
均值 Mean | 1.03 | 7.03 | 19.43 | 76.25 | 1.04 | 66.09 | |
变幅 Range | 0.63~1.59 | 4.57~8.83 | 14.94~26.04 | 64.66~89.61 | 0.72~1.32 | 46.07~92.07 | |
变异系数 Coefficient of variation/% | 31.54 | 24.27 | 18.26 | 11.55 | 23.35 | 21.00 | |
青海西宁 Xining, Qinghai | 甘05 Gan 05 | 1.32±0.02 bc | 6.56±0.21 bc | 21.85±2.21 a | 70.98±2.10 b | 0.73±0.11 b | 71.89±5.39 ab |
新09 Xin 09 | 1.39±0.08 a | 6.29±0.23 bc | 15.25±1.69 b | 80.54±2.24 a | 1.08±0.05 ab | 67.90±1.09 ab | |
黑02 Hei 02 | 1.11±0.13 bc | 8.60±0.77 a | 22.65±2.36 a | 74.35±2.18 ab | 1.09±0.07 ab | 70.11±2.10 ab | |
黑01 Hei 01 | 1.16±0.05 bc | 5.53±0.24 c | 20.53±1.97 ab | 73.69±1.68 ab | 0.96±0.04 ab | 72.09±0.99 a | |
辽01 Liao 01 | 1.01±0.03 c | 6.87±0.63 abc | 15.83±0.96 b | 77.94±3.46 ab | 0.99±0.12 ab | 69.34±2.16 ab | |
青02 Qing 02 | 1.63±0.08 a | 7.72±0.10 ab | 16.59±1.13 b | 71.37±2.48 b | 1.09±0.06 ab | 68.04±3.49 ab | |
晋01 Jin 01 | 1.30±0.02 abc | 7.53±0.32 abc | 16.38±1.45 b | 73.07±1.69 ab | 1.23±0.07 a | 58.96±0.98 b | |
均值 Mean | 1.27 | 7.02 | 18.44 | 74.56 | 1.02 | 68.33 | |
变幅 Range | 1.01~1.63 | 5.53~8.60 | 15.25~22.65 | 70.98~80.54 | 0.73~1.23 | 58.96~72.09 | |
变异系数 Coefficient of variation/% | 16.19 | 14.54 | 16.92 | 4.68 | 15.09 | 6.52 | |
陕西太白 Taibai, Shaanxi | 甘05 Gan 05 | 1.07±0.05 a | 10.41±0.36 a | 22.91±1.98 a | 75.98±2.71 bc | 0.84±0.05 b | 86.56±3.69 b |
新09 Xin 09 | 0.37±0.03 c | 6.18±0.10 c | 14.85±0.77 b | 90.69±2.87 a | 1.30±0.12 ab | 84.17±2.14 b | |
黑02 Hei 02 | 1.00±0.04 ab | 7.21±0.52 bc | 21.51±2.16 a | 81.85±2.62 ab | 1.14±0.07 ab | 61.53±1.06 c | |
黑01 Hei 01 | 0.78±0.05 b | 8.24±0.53 abc | 22.62±2.01 a | 65.02±2.61 c | 0.72±0.05 b | 63.51±3.15 c | |
辽01 Liao 01 | 1.04±0.06 ab | 6.47±0.70 c | 18.84±1.95 a | 80.49±3.61 ab | 1.51±0.07 a | 63.97±2.38 c | |
青02 Qing 02 | 0.99±0.06 ab | 9.23±0.66 ab | 22.51±2.26 a | 69.27±3.39 bc | 1.37±0.04 ab | 64.41±5.49 c | |
晋01 Jin 01 | 0.89±0.06 ab | 7.88±0.38 bc | 20.84±2.25 a | 80.71±2.54 ab | 1.46±0.07 a | 107.81±4.20 a | |
均值 Mean | 0.88 | 7.95 | 18.80 | 77.72 | 1.19 | 75.99 | |
变幅 Range | 0.37~1.07 | 6.18~10.41 | 14.85~22.91 | 65.02~90.69 | 0.72~1.51 | 61.53~107.81 | |
变异系数 Coefficient of variation/% | 27.79 | 18.97 | 15.36 | 10.99 | 25.88 | 23.01 |
试验点 Trial site | 品种 Cultivar | 产量 Yield/(kg·m-2) | 大蒜素 Allicin/(mg·g-1) | 可溶性蛋白 Soluble protein/(mg·g-1) | 可溶性糖 Soluble sugar/% | 锗 Germanium/(μg·kg-1) | 硒 Selenium/ (μg·kg-1) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
山东金乡 Jinxiang, Shandong | G024 | 2.21±0.07 a | 6.56±0.17 a | 19.93±1.23 bc | 88.28±1.51 ab | 0.96±0.06 ab | 61.86±2.00 bc |
G025 | 1.75±0.12 cd | 5.97±0.87 ab | 22.32±1.03 abc | 86.55±2.08 b | 0.83±0.07 bc | 61.23±2.18 bc | |
川01 Chuan 01 | 1.70±0.13 cd | 4.87±0.10 bc | 23.45±2.05 abc | 89.21±1.57 ab | 0.95±0.03 ab | 52.57±0.38 c | |
川02 Chuan 02 | 2.14±0.10 ab | 4.98±0.48 bc | 25.56±0.98 ab | 87.44±1.46 ab | 1.15±0.11 a | 76.68±4.63 a | |
川03 Chuan 03 | 1.78±0.11 cd | 6.65±0.41 a | 26.36±1.20 a | 88.62±2.45 ab | 0.90±0.04 ab | 55.74±0.83 c | |
贵01 Gui 01 | 1.44±0.05 d | 5.82±0.79 ab | 18.24±1.56 c | 93.31±1.45 ab | 0.85±0.07 bc | 58.13±1.57 bc | |
贵02 Gui 02 | 2.09±0.14 abc | 4.68±0.57 c | 26.55±1.08 a | 87.18±1.63 ab | 0.72±0.04 c | 58.20±0.83 bc | |
贵03 Gui 03 | 2.16±0.09 ab | 6.55±0.27 a | 25.41±2.13 ab | 91.56±3.17 ab | 0.84±0.07 bc | 61.40±1.12 bc | |
贵04 Gui 04 | 2.28±0.11 a | 5.15±0.33 ab | 23.44±2.14 abc | 94.44±2.61 ab | 0.66±0.02 c | 67.00±2.28 b | |
皖01 Wan 01 | 1.96±0.09 abc | 6.02±0.19 ab | 24.26±0.96 abc | 97.91±2.95 a | 1.02±0.10 ab | 67.25±1.17 ab | |
均值 Mean | 1.95 | 5.72 | 23.55 | 90.45 | 0.89 | 62.01 | |
变幅 Range | 1.44~2.28 | 4.68~6.65 | 18.24~26.55 | 86.55~97.91 | 0.66~1.15 | 52.57~76.68 | |
变异系数Coefficient of variation/% | 13.98 | 13.16 | 11.65 | 4.13 | 16.04 | 11.10 | |
江苏邳州 Pizhou, Jiangsu | G024 | 2.00±0.13 a | 7.51±0.63 ab | 18.39±1.32 a | 97.30±0.81 a | 1.08±0.19 b | 67.04±1.31 bc |
G025 | 1.32±0.11 ab | 7.92±0.57 ab | 21.18±2.10 a | 86.54±2.78 ab | 1.03±0.10 b | 83.03±2.37 a | |
川01 Chuan 01 | 1.70±0.08 a | 6.41±0.34 b | 19.24±1.89 a | 86.18±6.92 ab | 0.89±0.06 bc | 77.31±3.74 ab | |
川02 Chuan 02 | 1.57±0.09 ab | 8.42±0.96 a | 18.68±1.23 a | 91.36±6.81 ab | 1.06±0.12 b | 73.45±1.67 abc | |
川03 Chuan 03 | 1.45±0.03 ab | 8.75±0.61 a | 20.22±2.11 a | 91.72±3.47 ab | 0.98±0.06 b | 75.44±0.77 abc | |
贵01 Gui 01 | 0.91±0.10 b | 8.01±0.14 ab | 18.92±1.79 a | 90.33±1.83 ab | 1.53±0.03 a | 63.24±1.49 c | |
贵02 Gui 02 | 1.53±0.10 ab | 7.22±0.37 ab | 23.18±2.20 a | 86.07±1.74 b | 0.72±0.04 bc | 64.40±1.37 c | |
贵03 Gui 03 | 1.28±0.09 ab | 6.99±0.25 b | 17.93±1.58 a | 91.87±6.74 ab | 1.06±0.70 b | 67.68±1.58 bc | |
贵04 Gui 04 | 1.21±0.09 ab | 7.21±0.78 ab | 21.55±0.52 a | 94.59±2.20 ab | 1.01±0.15 b | 70.57±3.27 abc | |
皖01 Wan 01 | 1.32±0.11 ab | 8.05±0.17 ab | 22.96±0.89 a | 85.98±1.11 b | 0.98±0.04 b | 70.95±2.36 abc | |
均值 Mean | 1.43 | 7.65 | 20.23 | 90.19 | 1.03 | 71.31 | |
变幅 Range | 0.91~2.00 | 6.41~8.75 | 17.93~23.18 | 85.98~97.30 | 0.72~1.53 | 63.24~83.03 | |
变异系数Coefficient of variation/% | 20.83 | 9.29 | 9.41 | 4.38 | 19.75 | 8.62 | |
陕西杨凌Yangling, Shaanxi | G024 | 2.25±0.09 a | 8.28±0.21 bc | 9.88±0.58 c | 94.34±2.84 a | 0.69±0.07 c | 78.74±1.12 c |
G025 | 1.46±0.09 bcd | 11.40±0.27 ab | 17.61±0.26 b | 74.22±1.10 b | 1.46±0.12 a | 105.90±3.25 a | |
川01 Chuan 01 | 1.29±0.04 bcd | 13.62±0.63 ab | 21.46±1.67 ab | 78.04±3.41 ab | 0.95±0.08 abc | 99.35±2.33 b | |
川02 Chuan 02 | 1.47±0.10 bcd | 14.19±0.56 a | 23.74±2.69 ab | 83.57±2.90 ab | 1.32±0.06 ab | 86.03±3.11 bc | |
川03 Chuan 03 | 1.00±0.10 cd | 13.32±2.36 ab | 26.80±2.33 a | 81.75±3.11 ab | 0.64±0.06 c | 83.38±0.76 bc | |
贵01 Gui 01 | 0.95±0.12 d | 9.70±1.83 bc | 17.51±1.68 b | 87.24±3.47 ab | 1.18±0.13 ab | 85.62±4.40 bc | |
贵02 Gui 02 | 1.24±0.12 bcd | 7.24±0.32 c | 17.68±1.01 b | 86.62±2.19 ab | 0.78±0.12 bc | 76.20±1.08 c | |
贵03 Gui 03 | 1.51±0.11 bc | 12.08±1.78 ab | 25.38±0.96 a | 87.32±5.57 ab | 0.89±0.09 abc | 91.34±5.75 bc | |
贵04 Gui 04 | 1.59±0.05 b | 10.37±1.31 bc | 18.94±1.57 b | 79.26±5.46 ab | 0.95±0.04 abc | 88.57±3.10 bc | |
皖01 Wan 01 | 0.97±0.11 cd | 11.74±1.44 ab | 23.47±2.59 ab | 79.70±2.21 ab | 0.69±0.02 c | 97.18±5.90 bc | |
均值 Mean | 1.37 | 11.19 | 20.25 | 83.21 | 0.96 | 89.23 | |
变幅 Range | 0.95~2.25 | 7.24~14.19 | 9.88~26.80 | 74.22~94.34 | 0.64~1.46 | 76.20~105.90 | |
变异系数Coefficient of variation/% | 28.25 | 20.53 | 24.62 | 7.01 | 29.48 | 10.47 |
Table 3 Comparison of garlic varieties in autumn sowing area trial
试验点 Trial site | 品种 Cultivar | 产量 Yield/(kg·m-2) | 大蒜素 Allicin/(mg·g-1) | 可溶性蛋白 Soluble protein/(mg·g-1) | 可溶性糖 Soluble sugar/% | 锗 Germanium/(μg·kg-1) | 硒 Selenium/ (μg·kg-1) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
山东金乡 Jinxiang, Shandong | G024 | 2.21±0.07 a | 6.56±0.17 a | 19.93±1.23 bc | 88.28±1.51 ab | 0.96±0.06 ab | 61.86±2.00 bc |
G025 | 1.75±0.12 cd | 5.97±0.87 ab | 22.32±1.03 abc | 86.55±2.08 b | 0.83±0.07 bc | 61.23±2.18 bc | |
川01 Chuan 01 | 1.70±0.13 cd | 4.87±0.10 bc | 23.45±2.05 abc | 89.21±1.57 ab | 0.95±0.03 ab | 52.57±0.38 c | |
川02 Chuan 02 | 2.14±0.10 ab | 4.98±0.48 bc | 25.56±0.98 ab | 87.44±1.46 ab | 1.15±0.11 a | 76.68±4.63 a | |
川03 Chuan 03 | 1.78±0.11 cd | 6.65±0.41 a | 26.36±1.20 a | 88.62±2.45 ab | 0.90±0.04 ab | 55.74±0.83 c | |
贵01 Gui 01 | 1.44±0.05 d | 5.82±0.79 ab | 18.24±1.56 c | 93.31±1.45 ab | 0.85±0.07 bc | 58.13±1.57 bc | |
贵02 Gui 02 | 2.09±0.14 abc | 4.68±0.57 c | 26.55±1.08 a | 87.18±1.63 ab | 0.72±0.04 c | 58.20±0.83 bc | |
贵03 Gui 03 | 2.16±0.09 ab | 6.55±0.27 a | 25.41±2.13 ab | 91.56±3.17 ab | 0.84±0.07 bc | 61.40±1.12 bc | |
贵04 Gui 04 | 2.28±0.11 a | 5.15±0.33 ab | 23.44±2.14 abc | 94.44±2.61 ab | 0.66±0.02 c | 67.00±2.28 b | |
皖01 Wan 01 | 1.96±0.09 abc | 6.02±0.19 ab | 24.26±0.96 abc | 97.91±2.95 a | 1.02±0.10 ab | 67.25±1.17 ab | |
均值 Mean | 1.95 | 5.72 | 23.55 | 90.45 | 0.89 | 62.01 | |
变幅 Range | 1.44~2.28 | 4.68~6.65 | 18.24~26.55 | 86.55~97.91 | 0.66~1.15 | 52.57~76.68 | |
变异系数Coefficient of variation/% | 13.98 | 13.16 | 11.65 | 4.13 | 16.04 | 11.10 | |
江苏邳州 Pizhou, Jiangsu | G024 | 2.00±0.13 a | 7.51±0.63 ab | 18.39±1.32 a | 97.30±0.81 a | 1.08±0.19 b | 67.04±1.31 bc |
G025 | 1.32±0.11 ab | 7.92±0.57 ab | 21.18±2.10 a | 86.54±2.78 ab | 1.03±0.10 b | 83.03±2.37 a | |
川01 Chuan 01 | 1.70±0.08 a | 6.41±0.34 b | 19.24±1.89 a | 86.18±6.92 ab | 0.89±0.06 bc | 77.31±3.74 ab | |
川02 Chuan 02 | 1.57±0.09 ab | 8.42±0.96 a | 18.68±1.23 a | 91.36±6.81 ab | 1.06±0.12 b | 73.45±1.67 abc | |
川03 Chuan 03 | 1.45±0.03 ab | 8.75±0.61 a | 20.22±2.11 a | 91.72±3.47 ab | 0.98±0.06 b | 75.44±0.77 abc | |
贵01 Gui 01 | 0.91±0.10 b | 8.01±0.14 ab | 18.92±1.79 a | 90.33±1.83 ab | 1.53±0.03 a | 63.24±1.49 c | |
贵02 Gui 02 | 1.53±0.10 ab | 7.22±0.37 ab | 23.18±2.20 a | 86.07±1.74 b | 0.72±0.04 bc | 64.40±1.37 c | |
贵03 Gui 03 | 1.28±0.09 ab | 6.99±0.25 b | 17.93±1.58 a | 91.87±6.74 ab | 1.06±0.70 b | 67.68±1.58 bc | |
贵04 Gui 04 | 1.21±0.09 ab | 7.21±0.78 ab | 21.55±0.52 a | 94.59±2.20 ab | 1.01±0.15 b | 70.57±3.27 abc | |
皖01 Wan 01 | 1.32±0.11 ab | 8.05±0.17 ab | 22.96±0.89 a | 85.98±1.11 b | 0.98±0.04 b | 70.95±2.36 abc | |
均值 Mean | 1.43 | 7.65 | 20.23 | 90.19 | 1.03 | 71.31 | |
变幅 Range | 0.91~2.00 | 6.41~8.75 | 17.93~23.18 | 85.98~97.30 | 0.72~1.53 | 63.24~83.03 | |
变异系数Coefficient of variation/% | 20.83 | 9.29 | 9.41 | 4.38 | 19.75 | 8.62 | |
陕西杨凌Yangling, Shaanxi | G024 | 2.25±0.09 a | 8.28±0.21 bc | 9.88±0.58 c | 94.34±2.84 a | 0.69±0.07 c | 78.74±1.12 c |
G025 | 1.46±0.09 bcd | 11.40±0.27 ab | 17.61±0.26 b | 74.22±1.10 b | 1.46±0.12 a | 105.90±3.25 a | |
川01 Chuan 01 | 1.29±0.04 bcd | 13.62±0.63 ab | 21.46±1.67 ab | 78.04±3.41 ab | 0.95±0.08 abc | 99.35±2.33 b | |
川02 Chuan 02 | 1.47±0.10 bcd | 14.19±0.56 a | 23.74±2.69 ab | 83.57±2.90 ab | 1.32±0.06 ab | 86.03±3.11 bc | |
川03 Chuan 03 | 1.00±0.10 cd | 13.32±2.36 ab | 26.80±2.33 a | 81.75±3.11 ab | 0.64±0.06 c | 83.38±0.76 bc | |
贵01 Gui 01 | 0.95±0.12 d | 9.70±1.83 bc | 17.51±1.68 b | 87.24±3.47 ab | 1.18±0.13 ab | 85.62±4.40 bc | |
贵02 Gui 02 | 1.24±0.12 bcd | 7.24±0.32 c | 17.68±1.01 b | 86.62±2.19 ab | 0.78±0.12 bc | 76.20±1.08 c | |
贵03 Gui 03 | 1.51±0.11 bc | 12.08±1.78 ab | 25.38±0.96 a | 87.32±5.57 ab | 0.89±0.09 abc | 91.34±5.75 bc | |
贵04 Gui 04 | 1.59±0.05 b | 10.37±1.31 bc | 18.94±1.57 b | 79.26±5.46 ab | 0.95±0.04 abc | 88.57±3.10 bc | |
皖01 Wan 01 | 0.97±0.11 cd | 11.74±1.44 ab | 23.47±2.59 ab | 79.70±2.21 ab | 0.69±0.02 c | 97.18±5.90 bc | |
均值 Mean | 1.37 | 11.19 | 20.25 | 83.21 | 0.96 | 89.23 | |
变幅 Range | 0.95~2.25 | 7.24~14.19 | 9.88~26.80 | 74.22~94.34 | 0.64~1.46 | 76.20~105.90 | |
变异系数Coefficient of variation/% | 28.25 | 20.53 | 24.62 | 7.01 | 29.48 | 10.47 |
性状 Trait | 产量 Yield | 大蒜素 Allicin | 可溶性蛋白Soluble protein | 可溶性糖 Soluble sugar | 总锗 Germanium |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
大蒜素 Allicin | -0.32 | ||||
可溶性蛋白 Soluble protein | -0.30 | -0.01 | |||
可溶性糖 Soluble sugar | 0.42 | -0.39 | -0.46 | ||
锗 Germanium | -0.33 | 0.09 | -0.29 | -0.35 | |
硒 Gelenium | -0.13 | 0.66 | -0.38 | -0.12 | 0.13 |
Table 4 Correlation coefficient between yield and quality components of garlic
性状 Trait | 产量 Yield | 大蒜素 Allicin | 可溶性蛋白Soluble protein | 可溶性糖 Soluble sugar | 总锗 Germanium |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
大蒜素 Allicin | -0.32 | ||||
可溶性蛋白 Soluble protein | -0.30 | -0.01 | |||
可溶性糖 Soluble sugar | 0.42 | -0.39 | -0.46 | ||
锗 Germanium | -0.33 | 0.09 | -0.29 | -0.35 | |
硒 Gelenium | -0.13 | 0.66 | -0.38 | -0.12 | 0.13 |
主成份 Principal component | 第1主成分Principal component 1 | 第2主成分Principal component 2 | 第3主成分Principal component 3 | 第4主成分Principal component 4 | 第5主成分Principal component 5 | 第6主成分Principal component 6 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
特征值 Eigenvalue value | 2.300 | 1.676 | 1.059 | 0.526 | 0.302 | 0.138 |
方差贡献率 Variance contribution rate/% | 38.326 | 27.931 | 17.645 | 8.769 | 5.031 | 2.298 |
累积贡献率 Cumulative contribution rate/% | 38.326 | 66.257 | 83.902 | 92.671 | 97.702 | 100.000 |
Table 5 Principal component analysis
主成份 Principal component | 第1主成分Principal component 1 | 第2主成分Principal component 2 | 第3主成分Principal component 3 | 第4主成分Principal component 4 | 第5主成分Principal component 5 | 第6主成分Principal component 6 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
特征值 Eigenvalue value | 2.300 | 1.676 | 1.059 | 0.526 | 0.302 | 0.138 |
方差贡献率 Variance contribution rate/% | 38.326 | 27.931 | 17.645 | 8.769 | 5.031 | 2.298 |
累积贡献率 Cumulative contribution rate/% | 38.326 | 66.257 | 83.902 | 92.671 | 97.702 | 100.000 |
指标 Index | 第1主成分 Principal component 1 | 第2主成分 Principal component 2 | 第3主成分 Principal component 3 |
---|---|---|---|
产量 Yield | 0.683 | -0.204 | -0.291 |
大蒜素 Allicin | -0.200 | 0.830 | -0.077 |
可溶性蛋白 Soluble protein | -0.736 | -0.240 | -0.512 |
可溶性糖 Soluble sugar | 0.826 | -0.156 | 0.056 |
锗 Germanium | 0.032 | -0.095 | 0.930 |
硒 Selenium | 0.059 | 0.919 | -0.003 |
Table 6 Factor load matrix after rotation
指标 Index | 第1主成分 Principal component 1 | 第2主成分 Principal component 2 | 第3主成分 Principal component 3 |
---|---|---|---|
产量 Yield | 0.683 | -0.204 | -0.291 |
大蒜素 Allicin | -0.200 | 0.830 | -0.077 |
可溶性蛋白 Soluble protein | -0.736 | -0.240 | -0.512 |
可溶性糖 Soluble sugar | 0.826 | -0.156 | 0.056 |
锗 Germanium | 0.032 | -0.095 | 0.930 |
硒 Selenium | 0.059 | 0.919 | -0.003 |
试验点 Trial site | 品种 Variety | F1 | F2 | F3 | F | 综合评价 Comprehensive evaluation |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
山西大同 Datong, Shanxi | 甘05 Gan 05 | 1.655 | -0.114 | -0.158 | 0.575 | 较适应 More adapted |
黑02 Hei 02 | 0.764 | -0.284 | -0.459 | 0.133 | 一般 General | |
晋01 Jin 01 | 0.933 | -1.058 | 0.239 | 0.104 | 一般 General | |
新09 Xin 09 | 1.184 | -1.923 | 0.148 | -0.057 | 较不适应 Less adapted | |
辽01 Liao 01 | 0.676 | -2.169 | 0.478 | -0.262 | 较不适应 Less adapted | |
青02 Qing 02 | 0.415 | -1.496 | -0.120 | -0.280 | 较不适应 Less adapted | |
黑01 Hei 01 | -0.066 | -1.107 | -0.439 | -0.412 | 较不适应 Less adapted | |
青海西宁 Xining, Qinghai | 青02 Qing 02 | 0.942 | -0.210 | 1.305 | 0.533 | 较适应 More adapted |
新09 Xin 09 | -0.049 | 1.314 | 0.884 | 0.504 | 较适应 More adapted | |
黑02 Hei 02 | 1.151 | -0.783 | 0.000 | 0.223 | 一般 General | |
甘05 Gan 05 | 0.922 | -0.695 | -0.635 | 0.047 | 一般 General | |
黑01 Hei 01 | 0.761 | -0.883 | -0.11 | 0.025 | 一般 General | |
晋01 Jin 01 | 0.228 | -0.484 | 0.412 | 0.025 | 一般 General | |
辽01 Liao 01 | 0.462 | -0.249 | -0.646 | -0.006 | 较不适应 Less adapted | |
陕西太白 Taibai, Shaanxi | 甘05 Gan 05 | 1.380 | 0.381 | -0.225 | 0.596 | 较适应 More adapted |
辽01 Liao 01 | 1.066 | -0.270 | 0.778 | 0.471 | 一般 General | |
青02 Qing 02 | 1.237 | -0.792 | 0.688 | 0.374 | 一般 General | |
晋01 Jin 01 | 0.400 | 0.092 | 0.805 | 0.321 | 一般 General | |
黑02 Hei 02 | -0.746 | 1.012 | 0.620 | 0.106 | 一般 General | |
黑01 Hei 01 | 0.581 | -1.199 | 0.398 | -0.042 | 较不适应 Less adapted | |
新09 Xin 09 | 0.067 | -0.642 | 0.254 | -0.109 | 较不适应 Less adapted |
Table 7 Principal component scores and comprehensive evaluation of spring sowing garlic
试验点 Trial site | 品种 Variety | F1 | F2 | F3 | F | 综合评价 Comprehensive evaluation |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
山西大同 Datong, Shanxi | 甘05 Gan 05 | 1.655 | -0.114 | -0.158 | 0.575 | 较适应 More adapted |
黑02 Hei 02 | 0.764 | -0.284 | -0.459 | 0.133 | 一般 General | |
晋01 Jin 01 | 0.933 | -1.058 | 0.239 | 0.104 | 一般 General | |
新09 Xin 09 | 1.184 | -1.923 | 0.148 | -0.057 | 较不适应 Less adapted | |
辽01 Liao 01 | 0.676 | -2.169 | 0.478 | -0.262 | 较不适应 Less adapted | |
青02 Qing 02 | 0.415 | -1.496 | -0.120 | -0.280 | 较不适应 Less adapted | |
黑01 Hei 01 | -0.066 | -1.107 | -0.439 | -0.412 | 较不适应 Less adapted | |
青海西宁 Xining, Qinghai | 青02 Qing 02 | 0.942 | -0.210 | 1.305 | 0.533 | 较适应 More adapted |
新09 Xin 09 | -0.049 | 1.314 | 0.884 | 0.504 | 较适应 More adapted | |
黑02 Hei 02 | 1.151 | -0.783 | 0.000 | 0.223 | 一般 General | |
甘05 Gan 05 | 0.922 | -0.695 | -0.635 | 0.047 | 一般 General | |
黑01 Hei 01 | 0.761 | -0.883 | -0.11 | 0.025 | 一般 General | |
晋01 Jin 01 | 0.228 | -0.484 | 0.412 | 0.025 | 一般 General | |
辽01 Liao 01 | 0.462 | -0.249 | -0.646 | -0.006 | 较不适应 Less adapted | |
陕西太白 Taibai, Shaanxi | 甘05 Gan 05 | 1.380 | 0.381 | -0.225 | 0.596 | 较适应 More adapted |
辽01 Liao 01 | 1.066 | -0.270 | 0.778 | 0.471 | 一般 General | |
青02 Qing 02 | 1.237 | -0.792 | 0.688 | 0.374 | 一般 General | |
晋01 Jin 01 | 0.400 | 0.092 | 0.805 | 0.321 | 一般 General | |
黑02 Hei 02 | -0.746 | 1.012 | 0.620 | 0.106 | 一般 General | |
黑01 Hei 01 | 0.581 | -1.199 | 0.398 | -0.042 | 较不适应 Less adapted | |
新09 Xin 09 | 0.067 | -0.642 | 0.254 | -0.109 | 较不适应 Less adapted |
试验点 Trial site | 品种 Variety | F1 | F2 | F3 | F | 综合评价 Comprehensive evaluation |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
山东金乡 Jinxiang, Shandong | 贵04 Gui 04 | 0.607 | 1.588 | -0.291 | 0.625 | 较适应 More adapted |
G024 | -0.182 | 1.596 | 1.265 | 0.599 | 较适应 More adapted | |
川02 Chuan 02 | 0.219 | 0.182 | 0.791 | 0.274 | 一般 General | |
皖01 Wan 01 | 0.023 | 0.453 | 0.054 | 0.145 | 一般 General | |
贵03 Gui 03 | 0.293 | -0.15 | -0.277 | 0.021 | 一般 General | |
贵02 Gui 02 | 0.647 | -0.345 | -0.826 | 0.006 | 一般 General | |
贵01 Gui 01 | -0.469 | 0.188 | 0.355 | -0.065 | 较不适应 Less adapted | |
G025 | 0.305 | -0.914 | 0.200 | -0.103 | 较不适应 Less adapted | |
川03 Chuan 03 | 0.584 | -0.754 | -0.888 | -0.144 | 较不适应 Less adapted | |
川01 Chuan 01 | 0.070 | -0.731 | -0.561 | -0.277 | 较不适应 Less adapted | |
江苏邳州 Pizhou, Jiangsu | G024 | -0.554 | 1.698 | 2.497 | 0.703 | 较适应 More adapted |
贵02 Gui 02 | -0.228 | 1.911 | 1.094 | 0.639 | 较适应 More adapted | |
川02 Chuan 02 | 0.286 | 1.024 | 1.258 | 0.618 | 较适应 More adapted | |
川01 Chuan 01 | 0.199 | 1.940 | -0.061 | 0.607 | 较适应 More adapted | |
G025 | -0.204 | 0.888 | 1.076 | 0.360 | 一般 General | |
川03 Chuan 03 | -0.142 | 0.913 | -0.484 | 0.115 | 一般 General | |
皖01 Wan 01 | 0.178 | 0.688 | -0.823 | 0.115 | 一般 General | |
贵03 Gui 03 | -0.595 | 0.527 | 0.203 | -0.045 | 较不适应 Less adapted | |
贵04 Gui 04 | -0.393 | 0.422 | -0.106 | -0.052 | 较不适应 Less adapted | |
贵01 Gui 01 | -1.307 | 0.337 | 0.883 | -0.251 | 较不适应 Less adapted | |
陕西杨凌 Yangling, Shaanxi | G024 | 1.030 | 1.919 | -0.286 | 0.880 | 较适应 More adapted |
川02 Chuan 02 | 0.402 | 0.607 | 0.769 | 0.459 | 一般 General | |
G025 | -0.036 | 2.148 | -1.181 | 0.378 | 一般 General | |
贵03 Gui 03 | 0.242 | 1.444 | -0.732 | 0.367 | 一般 General | |
贵04 Gui 04 | 0.010 | 1.384 | -0.856 | 0.239 | 一般 General | |
川01 Chuan 01 | -0.640 | 0.231 | 0.535 | -0.086 | 较不适应 Less adapted | |
川03 Chuan 03 | 0.184 | 0.245 | -1.664 | -0.155 | 较不适应 Less adapted | |
贵01 Gui 01 | -0.729 | 0.299 | 0.163 | -0.167 | 较不适应 Less adapted | |
贵02 Gui 02 | -0.856 | 0.697 | -0.295 | -0.185 | 较不适应 Less adapted | |
皖01 Wan 01 | 0.200 | 0.134 | -1.831 | -0.209 | 较不适应 Less adapted |
Table 8 Principal component scores and comprehensive evaluation of autumn sown garlic
试验点 Trial site | 品种 Variety | F1 | F2 | F3 | F | 综合评价 Comprehensive evaluation |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
山东金乡 Jinxiang, Shandong | 贵04 Gui 04 | 0.607 | 1.588 | -0.291 | 0.625 | 较适应 More adapted |
G024 | -0.182 | 1.596 | 1.265 | 0.599 | 较适应 More adapted | |
川02 Chuan 02 | 0.219 | 0.182 | 0.791 | 0.274 | 一般 General | |
皖01 Wan 01 | 0.023 | 0.453 | 0.054 | 0.145 | 一般 General | |
贵03 Gui 03 | 0.293 | -0.15 | -0.277 | 0.021 | 一般 General | |
贵02 Gui 02 | 0.647 | -0.345 | -0.826 | 0.006 | 一般 General | |
贵01 Gui 01 | -0.469 | 0.188 | 0.355 | -0.065 | 较不适应 Less adapted | |
G025 | 0.305 | -0.914 | 0.200 | -0.103 | 较不适应 Less adapted | |
川03 Chuan 03 | 0.584 | -0.754 | -0.888 | -0.144 | 较不适应 Less adapted | |
川01 Chuan 01 | 0.070 | -0.731 | -0.561 | -0.277 | 较不适应 Less adapted | |
江苏邳州 Pizhou, Jiangsu | G024 | -0.554 | 1.698 | 2.497 | 0.703 | 较适应 More adapted |
贵02 Gui 02 | -0.228 | 1.911 | 1.094 | 0.639 | 较适应 More adapted | |
川02 Chuan 02 | 0.286 | 1.024 | 1.258 | 0.618 | 较适应 More adapted | |
川01 Chuan 01 | 0.199 | 1.940 | -0.061 | 0.607 | 较适应 More adapted | |
G025 | -0.204 | 0.888 | 1.076 | 0.360 | 一般 General | |
川03 Chuan 03 | -0.142 | 0.913 | -0.484 | 0.115 | 一般 General | |
皖01 Wan 01 | 0.178 | 0.688 | -0.823 | 0.115 | 一般 General | |
贵03 Gui 03 | -0.595 | 0.527 | 0.203 | -0.045 | 较不适应 Less adapted | |
贵04 Gui 04 | -0.393 | 0.422 | -0.106 | -0.052 | 较不适应 Less adapted | |
贵01 Gui 01 | -1.307 | 0.337 | 0.883 | -0.251 | 较不适应 Less adapted | |
陕西杨凌 Yangling, Shaanxi | G024 | 1.030 | 1.919 | -0.286 | 0.880 | 较适应 More adapted |
川02 Chuan 02 | 0.402 | 0.607 | 0.769 | 0.459 | 一般 General | |
G025 | -0.036 | 2.148 | -1.181 | 0.378 | 一般 General | |
贵03 Gui 03 | 0.242 | 1.444 | -0.732 | 0.367 | 一般 General | |
贵04 Gui 04 | 0.010 | 1.384 | -0.856 | 0.239 | 一般 General | |
川01 Chuan 01 | -0.640 | 0.231 | 0.535 | -0.086 | 较不适应 Less adapted | |
川03 Chuan 03 | 0.184 | 0.245 | -1.664 | -0.155 | 较不适应 Less adapted | |
贵01 Gui 01 | -0.729 | 0.299 | 0.163 | -0.167 | 较不适应 Less adapted | |
贵02 Gui 02 | -0.856 | 0.697 | -0.295 | -0.185 | 较不适应 Less adapted | |
皖01 Wan 01 | 0.200 | 0.134 | -1.831 | -0.209 | 较不适应 Less adapted |
1 | 陆帼一,程智慧.大蒜高产栽培[M].北京:金盾出版社,2009:1-5. |
LU G Y, CHENG Z H. High Yield Cultivation of Garlic [M]. Beijing: Jindun Press, 2009:1-5. | |
2 | 曹庆穗,徐为民,严建民,等.大蒜的功能成分及其保健功效[J].江苏农业科学,2004(6):134-136. |
CAO Q S, XU W M, YAN J M, et al.. Functional components and health care effects of garlic [J]. Jiangsu Agric. Sci., 2004(6):134-136. | |
3 | 佟广涛.大蒜种性退化原因及防止措施[J].现代农业科技,2010(17):151,153. |
TONG G T. Causes of garlic germplasm degradation and preventive measures [J]. Modern Agric. Sci. Tech., 2010(17):151,153. | |
4 | 李菊,苗明军,李金刚,等.基于6个重要农艺性状的四川地区大蒜资源表型评价[J].中国蔬菜,2018(3):63-68. |
LI J, MIAO M J, LI J G, et al.. Phenotype evaluation of garlic (Allium sativum L.) germplasm based on the six main agronomic traits in Sichuan area [J]. Chin. Veget., 2018(3):63-68. | |
5 | 李成祖.大蒜种性退化的原因及对策[J].青海农林科技,2007(3):52-53. |
LI C Z. The cause and countermeasures for deterioration of garlic [J]. Qinghai Agric. For. Sci. Tech., 2007(3):52-53. | |
6 | 林碧英,陈仁,高山.大蒜薹用品种引种及密度试验[J].福建农业科技,2007(5):21-22. |
LIN B Y, CHEN R, GAO S. Introduction and density trial of garlic scape varieties [J]. Fujian Agric. Sci. Tech., 2007(5):21-22. | |
7 | 薛艳,席彦军,蒋建华,等.汉中地区早薹蒜品种比较试验[J].长江蔬菜,2011(2):40-42. |
XUE Y, XI Y J, JIANG J H, et al.. Comparison of early bolting garlic cultivars in Hanzhong [J]. Yangtze River Veget., 2011(2):40-42. | |
8 | 温义昌,蒲建刚,王德贤,等.10个大蒜品种在天水市的引种试验初报[J].甘肃农业科技,2016(9):32-35. |
WEN Y C, PU J G, WANG D X, et al.. Preliminary report on introduction experiment of ten garlic varieties in Tianshui city [J]. Gansu Agric. Sci. Tech., 2016(9):32-35. | |
9 | 王薇薇,郭军,梅燚,等.大蒜种质资源的综合评价与聚类分析[J].江苏农业学报,2017,33(2):397-403. |
WANG W W, GUO J, MEI Y, et al.. Comprehensive evaluation and clustering analysis of garlic germplasm resources [J]. Jiangsu J. Agric. Sci., 2017, 33(2):397-403. | |
10 | 都真真,李锡香,宋江萍,等.228份引进大蒜资源的表型多样性分析及适应性初步评价[J].植物遗传资源学报,2019,20(5):1186-1196. |
DU Z Z, LI X X, SONG J P, et al.. Phenotypic diversity and adaptability analysis of 228 accessions of introduced garlic genetic resources [J]. Chin. J. Plant Genet. Resour., 2019, 20(5):1186-1196. | |
11 | 陈书霞,周静,申晓青,等.大蒜种质产量和品质性状主成分聚类分析与综合评价[J].植物遗传资源学报,2012,13(3):429-434. |
CHEN S X, ZHOU J, SHEN X Q, et al.. Cluster analysis and evaluation of garlic (Allium sativum L.) germplasm based on principal components [J]. Chin. J. Plant Genet. Resour., 2012, 13(3):429-434. | |
12 | 王海平,李锡香,沈镝,等.基于表型性状的中国大蒜资源遗传多样性分析[J].植物遗传资源学报,2014,15(1):24-31. |
WANG H P, LI X X, SHEN D, et al.. Evaluation on genetic diversity of garlic (Allium sativum L.) clones in China based on morphological characters [J]. Chin. J. Plant Genet. Resour., 2014, 15(1):24-31. | |
13 | 孔素萍,孙敬强,吴雄,等.大蒜主要农艺性状变异特征及其与产量相关构成分析[J].中国农业科学,2015,48(6):1240-1248. |
KONG S P, SUN J Q, WU X, et al.. Analysis of relationship between variations of main agronomic traits and yield in garlic [J]. Chin. Agric. Sci., 2015, 48(6):1240-1248. | |
14 | 孟丽娟,赵桂琴.国外引进红三叶种质在甘肃中部地区的生长特性及生产性能初步评价[J].草业学报,2015,24(9):30-42. |
MENG L J, ZHAO G Q. Evaluation of the adaptability of imported red clover germplasm in central Gansu [J]. J. Grass Ind., 2015, 24(9):30-42. | |
15 | 白奕.多指标综合评价的主成分分析模型及原理[J].陕西师范大学学报(自然科学版),1998,26(2):105-106. |
BAI Y. model and theory of main-portion analysis used in comprehensive evaluation of multiple targets [J]. J. Shaanxi Norm. Univ. (Nat. Sci.), 1998, 26(2):105-106. | |
16 | 李攀龙.中国主产区大蒜优质品种栽培适应性评价[D].杨凌:西北农林科技大学, 2019. |
LI P L. Adaptability evaluation of high quality garlic cultivars in main producing areas of China [D]. Yangling: Northwest A&F University, 2019. | |
17 | 赵勇强. 中国不同产区大蒜鳞茎品质评价及其与产地环境关系分析[D].杨凌:西北农林科技大学,2018. |
ZHAO Y Q. Evaluation on the quality of garlic bulbs in different production areas in China and its relationship with the environmental of producing areas [D]. Yangling: Northwest A&F University, 2018. | |
18 | 张胜珍,马艳芝.苹果总糖含量测定方法比较[J].江苏农业科学,2009(2):252-253. |
ZHANG S Z, MA Y Z. Comparison of determination methods of total sugar content in apples [J]. Jiangsu Agric. Sci., 2009(2):252-253. | |
19 | 周振,周能.仁东大蒜蛋白质的测定[J].光谱实验室,2011(5):2435-2438. |
ZHOU Z, ZHOU N. Determination of protein in rendong garlic [J]. Spect. Lab., 2011(5):2435-2438. | |
20 | 高俊凤.植物生理学实验指导[M].北京:高等教育出版社,2006:142-148. |
GAO J F. Experimental Guidance for Plant Physiology [M]. Beijing: Higher Education Press, 2006:142-148. | |
21 | 黄晓纯.微波消解-电感耦合等离子体质谱法测定植物样中锗[J].广东化工,2019,46(12):153-154. |
HUANG X C. Determination of gemanium in plant samples by inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry with microwave digestion [J]. Guangdong Chem. Ind., 2019, 46(12):153-154. | |
22 | 赵娜.温州蜜柑汁品质特性及复配改进研究[D].武汉:华中农业大学,2013. |
ZHAO N. The study on quality characteristics and blending improvements of juice satsuma mandarins [D]. Wuhan: Huazhong Agricultural University, 2013. | |
23 | 白沙沙,毕金峰,王沛,等.不同品种苹果果实品质分析[J].食品科学,2012,33(17):68-72. |
BAI S S, BI J F, WANG P, et al.. Fruit quality analysis of different apple varieties [J]. Food Sci., 2012, 33(17):68-72. | |
24 | 王靓钰,夏其乐,陈剑兵,等.基于主成分分析的不同品种柑橘制汁适应性研究[J].果树学报,2019,36(4):504-513. |
WANG J Y, XIA Q L, CHEN J B, et al. Study on suitability of different citrus varieties for juice manufacturing based on principal component analysis [J]. J. Fruit Sci., 2019, 36(4):504-513. | |
25 | 冯翠,衣政伟,杜静,等.大蒜种质资源农艺性状综合评价与适应性鉴定[J].江苏农业科学,2019,47(6):119-123. |
FENG C, YI Z W, DU J, et al.. Comprehensive evaluation and adaptability identification of agronomic characters of garlic germplasm resources [J]. Jiangsu Agric. Sci., 2019, 47(6):119-123. |
[1] | LI Junjie, DU Pufang, SHI Tingrui, HOU Peijia, CHAI Xinyu, ZHAO Rui, WANG Yu, LI Hongxia. LI Junjie, DU Pufang, SHI Tingrui, HOU Peijia, CHAI Xinyu, ZHAO Rui, WANG Yu, LI Hongxia* [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2021, 23(7): 21-32. |
[2] | WANG Ying1, YU Yanghua2*. Evolution in the Spatio-temporal Pattern of Agricultural Sustainable Development Level in China Based on Multi-scales [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2021, 23(3): 8-17. |
[3] | LUO Lina1, HAN Shuquan1*, WANG Daigu1, LI Maofu2, MA Weihong3, ZHANG Zhengxue1, LIU Xiaocui1. Analysis and Evaluation of the Differences in Fruit Quality of Avocado [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2021, 23(3): 105-113. |
[4] | CHEN Xiaojie, LYU Desheng, WANG Zhenhua, LI Wenhao, ZONG Rui, WEN Yue, ZOU Jie. Effects of Water and Nitrogen Coupling on the Yield and Quality of Processing Tomato Under Aerated Irrigation [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2021, 23(11): 191-200. |
[5] | ZHANG Yongfang, GAO Zhihui, SHI Pengqing, HAN Zhiping*. Adaptability Analysis of Different Soybean Varieties Based on Agronomic and Quality Traits [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2020, 22(8): 25-32. |
[6] |
WANG Hui, YANG Yuan, SHI Jinbo.
Adaptability Evaluation of Different Common Buckwheat Varieties (Lines) in Northern Shanxi
[J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2020, 22(8): 33-40.
|
[7] | SHI Yutao1, ZHENG Shulin1, WANG Feiquan1, CHEN Rongbing1, LI Yuanhua1, ZHANG Bo1, WANG Han2, LIN Li2. Characteristics Analysis of Mineral Element Contents in Wuyi Mingcong Tea Plant Germplasm Resources [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2020, 22(7): 37-50. |
[8] | WANG Ruixia, LI Xiaoyu, TIAN Hongxian*. Drought Resistance Identification and Comprehensive Drought Resistance Index Screening of Rapeseed(Brassica juncea L.)in North Shanxi#br# [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2020, 22(11): 42-51. |
[9] | WANG Zhongyun1, YU Yanghua2*, WANG Qianzi1. Effects of Nutrient Management Measures on Soil Fertility of Pitaya in Dry-hot Valley [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2020, 22(11): 176-186. |
[10] | SONG Yanping1, YU Yanghua2*, YANG Danli1, LUO Jing1. Studies on Soil Fertility Quality of Zanthoxylum planispinum var. Dingtanensis in Different Planting Bases [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2019, 21(9): 125-136. |
[11] | WANG Feiquan1, FENG Hua1, LUO Shengcai2, CHEN Rongbing1, YANG Huizhu1, LI Shaohua1, ZHNAG Jianming3, ZHANG Bo1, YE Jianghua1. Diversity Analysis of Agronomic Traits of Wuyi Mingcong Tea Plant Germplasm Resources [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2019, 21(6): 43-54. |
[12] | GUO Jiagui, SHI Shulei, XIE Tao, ZHANG Haitao, ZHAO Xingjian, JING Ruiyong, WANG Liyan*. Evaluation of Auricularia auricula-judae Nutrient Quality of Different Origins in Heilongjiang Province Based on Principal Component Analysis [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2019, 21(6): 94-100. |
[13] | SHI Jianhua1§, QI Lianfen1§, WANG Dandan1, LI Yan1, ZHANG Qingyin1, GE Xizhen2, TIAN Dongliang1*. Effects of Different Control Measures on Tomato Quality, Yield and Disease Incidence in Greenhouse [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2019, 21(4): 88-95. |
[14] | SUN Guoliao, CHEN Hong*, LI Shanjun, ZHANG Yanlin, XIONG Junqiang, SHAO Xian, XIA Binyun. Effects of Packaging Materials on Storage Quality of Citrus unshiu [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2019, 21(4): 104-113. |
[15] | YIN Lili1, XING Baolong2*. Adaptability Evaluation of Different Kidney Bean Varieties (Lines) in Northern Shanxi [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2019, 21(4): 151-157. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||