Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology ›› 2022, Vol. 24 ›› Issue (11): 179-189.DOI: 10.13304/j.nykjdb.2021.0525
• BIO-MANUFACTURING & RESOURCE AND ECOLOGY • Previous Articles
Heling FAN1(), Qing ZHU1, Xuebing SUN1, Li ZHANG1, Changjiang LI1, Ping CHEN2, Xiaolong HUANG3, Rongping ZHANG1(
)
Received:
2021-06-28
Accepted:
2021-08-23
Online:
2022-11-15
Published:
2022-11-29
Contact:
Rongping ZHANG
范鹤龄1(), 朱清1, 孙雪冰1, 张丽1, 李长江1, 陈萍2, 黄小龙3, 张荣萍1(
)
通讯作者:
张荣萍
作者简介:
范鹤龄 E-mail:664580513@qq.com;
基金资助:
CLC Number:
Heling FAN, Qing ZHU, Xuebing SUN, Li ZHANG, Changjiang LI, Ping CHEN, Xiaolong HUANG, Rongping ZHANG. Microbial Diversity and Community Structure of Different Agricultural Jiaosu[J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2022, 24(11): 179-189.
范鹤龄, 朱清, 孙雪冰, 张丽, 李长江, 陈萍, 黄小龙, 张荣萍. 不同农用酵素的微生物多样性和群落结构[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2022, 24(11): 179-189.
菌剂Microbe agent | 液态农用酵素Liquid jiaosu | 固态农用酵素Solid jiaosu | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
名称Name | 编号Code | 名称Name | 编号Code | 名称Name | 编号Code | ||
岛本酵素菌 Shimamoto Jiaosu microbial | B1 | 玉米秸秆 Corn stalk | L1 | 荆条茎叶 Brambles | S1 | ||
哈茨木霉 Hartz trichoderma viride | B2 | 蓖麻秸秆 Castor stalk | L2 | 青蒿+黄蒿 Artemisia carvifolia+Atemisia scoparia | S2 | ||
枯草芽孢杆菌 Bacillus subtilis | B3 | 黄蒿茎叶 Artemisia scoparia | L3 | 玉米秸秆 Corn stalk | S3 | ||
牛粪菌 Microbe of cow dung | B4 | 木麻黄针叶 Casuarina needles | L4 | 玉米秸秆+青蒿+黄蒿 Corn stalk+Artemisia carvifolia+ Artemisia scoparia | S4 | ||
羊粪菌 Microbe of sheep dung | B5 | 青蒿茎叶 Artemisia carvifolia | L5 | 玉米秸秆+荆条 Corn stalk+Brambles | S5 | ||
青蒿+黄蒿 Artemisia carvifolia+Artemisia scoparia | L6 | 玉米秸秆+鬼针草 Corn stalk+ghost needle grass | S6 | ||||
青蒿(自然菌) Artemisia carvifolia (natural fermentation) | L7 | 玉米秸秆+荆条+黄蒿+青蒿 Corn stalk+Brambles+Artemisia carvifolia+Artemisia scoparia | S7 | ||||
荆条+玉米秸秆 Brambles+corn stalk | L8 |
Table 1 Form and raw materials of agricultural Jiaosu
菌剂Microbe agent | 液态农用酵素Liquid jiaosu | 固态农用酵素Solid jiaosu | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
名称Name | 编号Code | 名称Name | 编号Code | 名称Name | 编号Code | ||
岛本酵素菌 Shimamoto Jiaosu microbial | B1 | 玉米秸秆 Corn stalk | L1 | 荆条茎叶 Brambles | S1 | ||
哈茨木霉 Hartz trichoderma viride | B2 | 蓖麻秸秆 Castor stalk | L2 | 青蒿+黄蒿 Artemisia carvifolia+Atemisia scoparia | S2 | ||
枯草芽孢杆菌 Bacillus subtilis | B3 | 黄蒿茎叶 Artemisia scoparia | L3 | 玉米秸秆 Corn stalk | S3 | ||
牛粪菌 Microbe of cow dung | B4 | 木麻黄针叶 Casuarina needles | L4 | 玉米秸秆+青蒿+黄蒿 Corn stalk+Artemisia carvifolia+ Artemisia scoparia | S4 | ||
羊粪菌 Microbe of sheep dung | B5 | 青蒿茎叶 Artemisia carvifolia | L5 | 玉米秸秆+荆条 Corn stalk+Brambles | S5 | ||
青蒿+黄蒿 Artemisia carvifolia+Artemisia scoparia | L6 | 玉米秸秆+鬼针草 Corn stalk+ghost needle grass | S6 | ||||
青蒿(自然菌) Artemisia carvifolia (natural fermentation) | L7 | 玉米秸秆+荆条+黄蒿+青蒿 Corn stalk+Brambles+Artemisia carvifolia+Artemisia scoparia | S7 | ||||
荆条+玉米秸秆 Brambles+corn stalk | L8 |
编号 Code | 细菌 Bacteria | 真菌 Fungi | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
序列数 Sequence number | 平均长度 Mean length/bp | OTU数量 OTUs | 序列数 Sequence number | 平均长度 Mean length/bp | OTU数量 OTUs | |
B1 | 54 127 | 448.16 | 292 | 50 889 | 401.78 | 54 |
B2 | 45 339 | 445.92 | 235 | 31 566 | 401.99 | 11 |
B3 | 59 896 | 450.85 | 64 | 36 785 | 402.10 | 41 |
B4 | 58 767 | 434.36 | 232 | 65 896 | 402.63 | 69 |
B5 | 41 921 | 448.20 | 264 | 42 419 | 402.20 | 45 |
L1 | 44 637 | 435.25 | 379 | 42 501 | 398.09 | 44 |
L2 | 34 370 | 449.50 | 115 | 41 111 | 398.00 | 7 |
L3 | 59 808 | 444.56 | 102 | 55 052 | 398.29 | 17 |
L4 | 49 213 | 435.07 | 467 | 49 736 | 400.26 | 30 |
L5 | 38 827 | 449.33 | 134 | 34 707 | 398.04 | 13 |
L6 | 38 648 | 444.43 | 61 | 41 150 | 398.07 | 15 |
L7 | 40 617 | 442.87 | 121 | 32 573 | 398.03 | 11 |
L8 | 38 824 | 444.91 | 126 | 35 894 | 398.08 | 9 |
S1 | 43 249 | 434.90 | 1 015 | 53 247 | 402.61 | 61 |
S2 | 46 600 | 436.57 | 1 033 | 50 273 | 402.59 | 58 |
S3 | 51 527 | 435.70 | 1 295 | 57 481 | 400.93 | 93 |
S4 | 73 188 | 437.07 | 1 400 | 70 842 | 401.98 | 85 |
S5 | 74 416 | 438.68 | 1 378 | 50 649 | 401.85 | 70 |
S6 | 54 569 | 436.93 | 1 339 | 46 578 | 401.40 | 81 |
S7 | 74 735 | 438.42 | 1 474 | 61 107 | 402.13 | 84 |
Table 2 High-throughput sequencing data of different Jiaosu for agriculture
编号 Code | 细菌 Bacteria | 真菌 Fungi | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
序列数 Sequence number | 平均长度 Mean length/bp | OTU数量 OTUs | 序列数 Sequence number | 平均长度 Mean length/bp | OTU数量 OTUs | |
B1 | 54 127 | 448.16 | 292 | 50 889 | 401.78 | 54 |
B2 | 45 339 | 445.92 | 235 | 31 566 | 401.99 | 11 |
B3 | 59 896 | 450.85 | 64 | 36 785 | 402.10 | 41 |
B4 | 58 767 | 434.36 | 232 | 65 896 | 402.63 | 69 |
B5 | 41 921 | 448.20 | 264 | 42 419 | 402.20 | 45 |
L1 | 44 637 | 435.25 | 379 | 42 501 | 398.09 | 44 |
L2 | 34 370 | 449.50 | 115 | 41 111 | 398.00 | 7 |
L3 | 59 808 | 444.56 | 102 | 55 052 | 398.29 | 17 |
L4 | 49 213 | 435.07 | 467 | 49 736 | 400.26 | 30 |
L5 | 38 827 | 449.33 | 134 | 34 707 | 398.04 | 13 |
L6 | 38 648 | 444.43 | 61 | 41 150 | 398.07 | 15 |
L7 | 40 617 | 442.87 | 121 | 32 573 | 398.03 | 11 |
L8 | 38 824 | 444.91 | 126 | 35 894 | 398.08 | 9 |
S1 | 43 249 | 434.90 | 1 015 | 53 247 | 402.61 | 61 |
S2 | 46 600 | 436.57 | 1 033 | 50 273 | 402.59 | 58 |
S3 | 51 527 | 435.70 | 1 295 | 57 481 | 400.93 | 93 |
S4 | 73 188 | 437.07 | 1 400 | 70 842 | 401.98 | 85 |
S5 | 74 416 | 438.68 | 1 378 | 50 649 | 401.85 | 70 |
S6 | 54 569 | 436.93 | 1 339 | 46 578 | 401.40 | 81 |
S7 | 74 735 | 438.42 | 1 474 | 61 107 | 402.13 | 84 |
Fig. 3 Number of OTUs of different dosage forms of Jiaosu for agricultureNote: *, ** and *** mean significant differences at P<0.05, P<0.01 and P<0.001 levels, respectively.
编号 Number | 细菌 Bacteria | 真菌 Fungi | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Shannon | Simpson | Ace | Chao 1 | Shannon | Simpson | Ace | Chao 1 | |
B1 | 2.40 | 0.223 3 | 467 | 404 | 1.68 | 0.275 7 | 59 | 56 |
B2 | 2.51 | 0.241 6 | 239 | 239 | 0.09 | 0.972 1 | 11 | 11 |
B3 | 0.23 | 0.927 8 | 140 | 102 | 1.43 | 0.396 0 | 43 | 44 |
B4 | 3.41 | 0.110 7 | 261 | 279 | 1.53 | 0.451 1 | 75 | 73 |
B5 | 2.31 | 0.234 8 | 493 | 394 | 1.67 | 0.303 3 | 48 | 47 |
L1 | 3.42 | 0.059 2 | 716 | 583 | 0.73 | 0.587 5 | 48 | 46 |
L2 | 0.88 | 0.605 1 | 193 | 156 | 0.04 | 0.989 9 | 7 | 7 |
L3 | 2.49 | 0.133 1 | 305 | 181 | 0.91 | 0.451 4 | 18 | 19 |
L4 | 4.37 | 0.055 7 | 504 | 520 | 0.82 | 0.642 6 | 35 | 35 |
L5 | 1.93 | 0.222 4 | 173 | 166 | 0.59 | 0.671 3 | 15 | 13 |
L6 | 1.07 | 0.599 2 | 99 | 95 | 0.43 | 0.802 7 | 16 | 16 |
L7 | 2.22 | 0.279 7 | 156 | 159 | 0.11 | 0.967 3 | 12 | 11 |
L8 | 1.21 | 0.593 3 | 151 | 159 | 0.23 | 0.919 7 | 11 | 10 |
S1 | 5.54 | 0.008 6 | 1167 | 1210 | 1.55 | 0.344 0 | 73 | 72 |
S2 | 5.47 | 0.010 9 | 1199 | 1208 | 1.61 | 0.314 9 | 78 | 75 |
S3 | 6.08 | 0.005 2 | 1455 | 1488 | 2.67 | 0.115 2 | 98 | 100 |
S4 | 5.61 | 0.017 3 | 1548 | 1572 | 2.25 | 0.163 1 | 88 | 87 |
S5 | 5.17 | 0.050 4 | 1556 | 1573 | 2.20 | 0.158 3 | 81 | 90 |
S6 | 5.55 | 0.012 1 | 1488 | 1522 | 2.37 | 0.146 9 | 92 | 92 |
S7 | 5.50 | 0.028 5 | 1605 | 1617 | 2.24 | 0.178 9 | 89 | 88 |
Table 3 Diversity index of different Jiaosu for agriculture
编号 Number | 细菌 Bacteria | 真菌 Fungi | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Shannon | Simpson | Ace | Chao 1 | Shannon | Simpson | Ace | Chao 1 | |
B1 | 2.40 | 0.223 3 | 467 | 404 | 1.68 | 0.275 7 | 59 | 56 |
B2 | 2.51 | 0.241 6 | 239 | 239 | 0.09 | 0.972 1 | 11 | 11 |
B3 | 0.23 | 0.927 8 | 140 | 102 | 1.43 | 0.396 0 | 43 | 44 |
B4 | 3.41 | 0.110 7 | 261 | 279 | 1.53 | 0.451 1 | 75 | 73 |
B5 | 2.31 | 0.234 8 | 493 | 394 | 1.67 | 0.303 3 | 48 | 47 |
L1 | 3.42 | 0.059 2 | 716 | 583 | 0.73 | 0.587 5 | 48 | 46 |
L2 | 0.88 | 0.605 1 | 193 | 156 | 0.04 | 0.989 9 | 7 | 7 |
L3 | 2.49 | 0.133 1 | 305 | 181 | 0.91 | 0.451 4 | 18 | 19 |
L4 | 4.37 | 0.055 7 | 504 | 520 | 0.82 | 0.642 6 | 35 | 35 |
L5 | 1.93 | 0.222 4 | 173 | 166 | 0.59 | 0.671 3 | 15 | 13 |
L6 | 1.07 | 0.599 2 | 99 | 95 | 0.43 | 0.802 7 | 16 | 16 |
L7 | 2.22 | 0.279 7 | 156 | 159 | 0.11 | 0.967 3 | 12 | 11 |
L8 | 1.21 | 0.593 3 | 151 | 159 | 0.23 | 0.919 7 | 11 | 10 |
S1 | 5.54 | 0.008 6 | 1167 | 1210 | 1.55 | 0.344 0 | 73 | 72 |
S2 | 5.47 | 0.010 9 | 1199 | 1208 | 1.61 | 0.314 9 | 78 | 75 |
S3 | 6.08 | 0.005 2 | 1455 | 1488 | 2.67 | 0.115 2 | 98 | 100 |
S4 | 5.61 | 0.017 3 | 1548 | 1572 | 2.25 | 0.163 1 | 88 | 87 |
S5 | 5.17 | 0.050 4 | 1556 | 1573 | 2.20 | 0.158 3 | 81 | 90 |
S6 | 5.55 | 0.012 1 | 1488 | 1522 | 2.37 | 0.146 9 | 92 | 92 |
S7 | 5.50 | 0.028 5 | 1605 | 1617 | 2.24 | 0.178 9 | 89 | 88 |
1 | KANG H Z, YU W J, DUTTA S, et al.. Soil microbial community composition and function are closely associated with soil organic matter chemistry along a latitudinal gradient [J/OL]. Geoderma, 2021, 383:114744 [2021-01-08]. . |
2 | COMER J, PERKINS L. Resistance of the soil microbial community to land-surface disturbances of high-intensity winter grazing and wildfire [J/OL]. J. Environ. Manage., 2021, 279:111596 [2021-01-13]. . |
3 | LARKIN R P. Relative effects of biological amendments and crop rotations on soil microbial communities and soilborne diseases of potato [J]. Soil Biol. Biochem., 2008, 40(6):1341-1351. |
4 | LIU W X, WANG Q L, WANG B Z, et al.. Changes in the abundance and structure of bacterial communities under long-term fertilization treatments in a peanut monocropping system [J]. Plant Soil, 2015, 395(1):415-427. |
5 | CARRARA J E, WALTER C A, HAWKINS J S, et al.. Interactions among plants, bacteria, and fungi reduce extracellular enzyme activities under long-term N fertilization [J]. Global Change Biol., 2018, 24(6):2721-2734. |
6 | WANG J X, LU X N, ZHANG J E, et al.. Intercropping perennial aquatic plants with rice improved paddy field soil microbial biomass, biomass carbon and biomass nitrogen to facilitate soil sustainability [J/OL]. Soil Till. Res., 2021, 208:104908 [2021-01-06]. . |
7 | SAMUEL O D, GRACE A O. Improving soil fertility and performance of tomato plant using the anaerobic digestate of tithonia diversifolia as Bio-fertilizer [J/OL]. IOP Conference Series: Earth Environ. Sci., 2018, 210(1): 012014 [2021-01-08]. . |
8 | ZHAO Q Y, DONG C X, YANG X M, et al.. Biocontrol of Fusarium wilt disease for Cucumis melo melon using bio-organic fertilizer [J]. Appl. Soil Ecol., 2011, 47(1):67-75. |
9 | AI-SAYED H M, HEGAB S A, YOUSSEF M A, et al.. Evaluation of quality and growth of roselle ( Hibiscus sabdariffa L.) as affected by bio-fertilizers [J]. J. Plant Nutr., 2020, 43(7):1-11. |
10 | GENG Y J, WANG J Y, SUN Z R, et al.. Soil N-oxide emissions decrease from intensive greenhouse vegetable fields by substituting synthetic N fertilizer with organic and bio-organic fertilizers [J/OL]. Geoderma, 2021, 383: 114730 [2021-01-08]. . |
11 | 中华人民共和国工业和信息化部. 植物酵素: [S].北京:中国轻工业出版社,2018. |
12 | 马倩颖.浅析环保酵素在家居和农业上的应用[J].科技风,2018(5):150. |
13 | 侯乾.连作马铃薯全生育期根际微生物多样性研究及施肥对其的影响[D].北京:中国农业科学院,2020. |
HOU Q. The rhizosphere microbial diversity during the growth period of continuous cropping potato and the effect of fertilization [D]. Beijing: Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, 2020. | |
14 | 范鹤龄,王浩晨,陈伟益,等.酵素对热区土壤理化性状和作物生长的影响[J].中国农学通报,2021,37(22):76-83. |
FAN H L, WANG H C, CHEN W Y, et al.. Effects of Jiaosu on soil physical and chemical properties and crop growth in tropical region [J]. Chin. Agric. Sci. Bull., 2021, 37(22):76-83. | |
15 | 范鹤龄,陆建明,孙雪冰,等.酵素堆肥对海南冬季辣椒生长的影响[J].中国瓜菜,2022,35(3):70-75. |
FAN H L, LU J M, SHUN X B, et al.. Effect of microbe compost on pepper growth during winter season in Hainan [J]. China Cucurbits Veget., 2022, 35(3):70-75. | |
16 | 岛本邦彦.岛本微生物农业应用法[M].郑重,译.日本磐亚株式会社,1996:23-45. |
17 | AMATO K R, YEOMAN C J, KENT A, et al.. Habitat degradation impacts black howler monkey (Alouatta pigra) gastrointestinal microbiomes [J]. SME J., 2013, 7(7):1344-1353. |
18 | 王宁,刘铜,靳亚忠,等.木霉菌对土壤微生物多样性及草莓生长和发病的影响[J].江苏农业科学,2018,46(18):108-112. |
WANG N, LIU T, JIN Y Z . et al .. Effects of Trichoderma spp. on soil microbial diversity and growth and morbidity of strawberry [J]. Jiangsu Agric. Sci., 2018, 46(18):108-112. | |
19 | CHEN C, LIU B Y. Changes in major components of tea fungus metabolites during prolonged fermentation [J]. J. Appl. Microbiol., 2000, 89(5):834-839. |
20 | ZHANG Y, GAO Y H, ZHANG Z H, et al.. A microbial ecosystem: agricultural Jiaosu achieves effective and lasting antifungal activity against Botrytis cinerea. [J]. AMB Express, 2020, 10(1):216-228. |
21 | TAO C Y, LI R, XIONG W, et al.. Bio-organic fertilizers stimulate indigenous soil Pseudomonas populations to enhance plant disease suppression [J]. Microbiome, 2020, 8(1):137-148. |
22 | ZHANG H, HUA Z W, LIANG W Z, et al.. The prevention of bio-organic fertilizer fermented from cow manure compost by Bacillus sp. XG-1 on watermelon continuous cropping barrier [J]. Internat. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, 2020, 17(16):5714-5726. |
23 | LU P N, BAINARD L D, MA B, et al.. Bio-fertilizer and rotten straw amendments alter the rhizosphere bacterial community and increase oat productivity in a saline-alkaline environment. [J/OL]. Sci. Rep., 2020, 10(1):19896 [2021-11-16]. . |
24 | AZMAT A, YASMIN H, HASSAN M N, et al.. Co-application of bio-fertilizer and salicylic acid improves growth, photosynthetic pigments and stress tolerance in wheat under drought stress. [J/OL]. Peer J., 2020, 8:e9960 [2021-10-27]. . |
25 | 张宇冲,何思蓓,高灵会,等.生物有机肥对芦笋土壤酶活性及细菌群落的影响[J].北方园艺, 2019(12):83-91. |
ZHANG Y C, HE S B, GAO L H, et al.. Effects of bio-organic fertilizer on enzyme activity and soil bacterial community in Asparagus cultivated soil [J]. Northern Hortic., 2019(12):83-91. |
[1] | ZHANG Lei, LUO Zehua, YANG Mingchuan, LI Shigui, XIN Yuhua, CAI Bin, LIU Haobao, CENG Dailong, GU Jingang, DUAN Bihua. Diversity of Fermentation Microbes and Changes of Hydrolytic Enzyme Activities of Cigar Leaf Raw Materials [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2021, 23(10): 171-180. |
[2] | LIU Qian1,2, LI Jichao1, ZUO Yingmei1, YANG Tianmei1, YANG Meiquan1, ZHANG Jinyu1*. Influences of Organic Mulching on Soil Nutrient and Microbial Diversity of Panax notoginseng (Burk.) F. H. Chen [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2021, 23(1): 162-175. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||