Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology ›› 2024, Vol. 26 ›› Issue (5): 11-19.DOI: 10.13304/j.nykjdb.2024.0178
• AGRICULTURAL INNOVATION FORUM • Previous Articles Next Articles
Guanghao CUI1(), Zhifang CHEN1, Jianzhong LU1,2(
)
Received:
2024-03-08
Accepted:
2024-03-28
Online:
2024-05-15
Published:
2024-05-14
Contact:
Jianzhong LU
通讯作者:
陆建中
作者简介:
崔广浩cui15233885619@163.com;
基金资助:
CLC Number:
Guanghao CUI, Zhifang CHEN, Jianzhong LU. Research on the Performance Evaluation Index System for Management Positions in Agricultural Research Institutes[J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2024, 26(5): 11-19.
崔广浩, 陈智芳, 陆建中. 农业科研院所管理岗位绩效考核指标体系研究[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2024, 26(5): 11-19.
目标层 Target layer | 准则层 Criterion layer | 方案层 Scenario layer | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
一级指标(权重) Frist-level indicator (weight) | 二级指标(权重) Second-level indicator (weight) | 组合权重 Combined weight | 三级指标(权重) Third-level indicator (weight) | 组合权重 Combined weight | |
考核指标 Evaluation indicator | A:岗位履职 Perform job (0.416 9) | A1:工作计划 Work plan (0.355 3) | 0.148 1 | A11:制定岗位年度工作计划 Develop annual position plan (1.000 0) | 0.148 1 |
A2:任务完成 Assignment completion (0.411 0) | 0.171 3 | A21:计划任务完成率 Completion rate of planned assignment(1.000 0) | 0.171 3 | ||
A3:临时任务 Temporary assignment (0.233 7) | 0.097 4 | A31:临时任务完成率 Completion rate of temporary assignment (1.000 0) | 0.097 4 |
Table 1 Weight of quantitative evaluation index for managerial position in agricultural research institutes
目标层 Target layer | 准则层 Criterion layer | 方案层 Scenario layer | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
一级指标(权重) Frist-level indicator (weight) | 二级指标(权重) Second-level indicator (weight) | 组合权重 Combined weight | 三级指标(权重) Third-level indicator (weight) | 组合权重 Combined weight | |
考核指标 Evaluation indicator | A:岗位履职 Perform job (0.416 9) | A1:工作计划 Work plan (0.355 3) | 0.148 1 | A11:制定岗位年度工作计划 Develop annual position plan (1.000 0) | 0.148 1 |
A2:任务完成 Assignment completion (0.411 0) | 0.171 3 | A21:计划任务完成率 Completion rate of planned assignment(1.000 0) | 0.171 3 | ||
A3:临时任务 Temporary assignment (0.233 7) | 0.097 4 | A31:临时任务完成率 Completion rate of temporary assignment (1.000 0) | 0.097 4 |
目标层 Target layer | 准则层 Criterion layer | 方案层 Scenario layer | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
一级指标(权重) Frist-level indicator (weight) | 二级指标(权重) Second-level indicator (weight) | 组合权重 Combined weight | 三级指标(权重) Third-level indicator (weight) | 组合权重 Combined weight | |
考核指标 Evaluation indicator | B:岗位创新 Job innovation (0.172 3) | B1:工作调研 Work survey and research (0.372 1) | 0.064 1 | B11:调研报告 Survey and research report (1.000 0) | 0.064 1 |
B2:工作建议 Work suggestion (0.378 5) | 0.065 3 | B21:工作方案 Programme of work (0.445 0) | 0.029 1 | ||
B22:工作意见 Work advice (0.555 0) | 0.036 2 | ||||
B3:创新活动 Innovation activity (0.249 4) | 0.043 0 | B31:开展创新性活动 Carry out innovative activity (1.000 0) | 0.043 0 | ||
C:岗位匹配 Job matching (0.219 2) | C1:工作适用性 Suitability for work (0.389 1) | 0.085 4 | C11:岗位匹配度 Job matching degree (0.560 2) | 0.047 8 | |
C12:岗位履职时间 Job performance time (0.439 8) | 0.037 6 | ||||
C2:学习情况 Learning situation (0.213 5) | 0.046 8 | C21:学习培训时间 Study and training time (0.641 3) | 0.030 0 | ||
C22:学习培训次数 Number of training sessions (0.358 7) | 0.016 8 | ||||
C3:成长情况 Growth (0.248 4) | 0.054 4 | C31:职称晋升 Promotion of position (0.536 6) | 0.029 2 | ||
C32:职务晋升 Promotion of professional title (0.463 4) | 0.025 2 | ||||
C4:社会活动 Social activity (0.149 0) | 0.032 7 | C41:参加社会活动 Participate in social activity (0.389 0) | 0.012 7 | ||
C42:同上级部门交流 Communicate with higher authority (0.611 0) | 0.020 0 | ||||
D:岗位影响 Job effect (0.191 6) | D1:满意度 Satisfaction (0.409 4) | 0.078 4 | D11:领导测评满意度 Leader assessment satisfaction (0.456 2) | 0.035 8 | |
D12:服务对象测评满意度 Customer satisfaction (0.257 9) | 0.020 2 | ||||
D13:部门同事测评满意度 Assessment satifaction from department colleagues (0.285 9) | 0.022 4 |
Table 1 Weight of quantitative evaluation index for managerial position in agricultural research institutes
目标层 Target layer | 准则层 Criterion layer | 方案层 Scenario layer | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
一级指标(权重) Frist-level indicator (weight) | 二级指标(权重) Second-level indicator (weight) | 组合权重 Combined weight | 三级指标(权重) Third-level indicator (weight) | 组合权重 Combined weight | |
考核指标 Evaluation indicator | B:岗位创新 Job innovation (0.172 3) | B1:工作调研 Work survey and research (0.372 1) | 0.064 1 | B11:调研报告 Survey and research report (1.000 0) | 0.064 1 |
B2:工作建议 Work suggestion (0.378 5) | 0.065 3 | B21:工作方案 Programme of work (0.445 0) | 0.029 1 | ||
B22:工作意见 Work advice (0.555 0) | 0.036 2 | ||||
B3:创新活动 Innovation activity (0.249 4) | 0.043 0 | B31:开展创新性活动 Carry out innovative activity (1.000 0) | 0.043 0 | ||
C:岗位匹配 Job matching (0.219 2) | C1:工作适用性 Suitability for work (0.389 1) | 0.085 4 | C11:岗位匹配度 Job matching degree (0.560 2) | 0.047 8 | |
C12:岗位履职时间 Job performance time (0.439 8) | 0.037 6 | ||||
C2:学习情况 Learning situation (0.213 5) | 0.046 8 | C21:学习培训时间 Study and training time (0.641 3) | 0.030 0 | ||
C22:学习培训次数 Number of training sessions (0.358 7) | 0.016 8 | ||||
C3:成长情况 Growth (0.248 4) | 0.054 4 | C31:职称晋升 Promotion of position (0.536 6) | 0.029 2 | ||
C32:职务晋升 Promotion of professional title (0.463 4) | 0.025 2 | ||||
C4:社会活动 Social activity (0.149 0) | 0.032 7 | C41:参加社会活动 Participate in social activity (0.389 0) | 0.012 7 | ||
C42:同上级部门交流 Communicate with higher authority (0.611 0) | 0.020 0 | ||||
D:岗位影响 Job effect (0.191 6) | D1:满意度 Satisfaction (0.409 4) | 0.078 4 | D11:领导测评满意度 Leader assessment satisfaction (0.456 2) | 0.035 8 | |
D12:服务对象测评满意度 Customer satisfaction (0.257 9) | 0.020 2 | ||||
D13:部门同事测评满意度 Assessment satifaction from department colleagues (0.285 9) | 0.022 4 |
目标层 Target layer | 准则层 Criterion layer | 方案层 Scenario layer | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
一级指标(权重) Frist-level indicator (weight) | 二级指标(权重) Second-level indicator (weight) | 组合权重 Combined weight | 三级指标(权重) Third-level indicator (weight) | 组合权重 Combined weight | ||
考核指标 Evaluation indicator | D:岗位影响 Job effect (0.191 6) | D2:正面影响 Positive effect (0.393 7) | 0.075 4 | D21:国家级及省部级个人称号荣誉 Personal hornor at national, provincal or ministerial level (0.502 4) | 0.037 9 | |
D22:院级个人称号荣誉 Personal honor at college or academy level (0.233 3) | 0.017 6 | |||||
D23:所级个人称号荣誉 Personal honor at institute level (0.134 1) | 0.010 1 | |||||
D24:部门集体荣誉 Collective honor of the department (0.130 2) | 0.009 8 | |||||
D3:负面影响 Negative effect (0.196 9) | 0.037 7 | D31:信访举报 Complaint reporting (0.248 0) | 0.009 3 | |||
D32:组织处理 Organization criticism (0.373 9) | 0.014 1 | |||||
D33:纪律处分 Disciplinary action (0.378 1) | 0.014 3 |
Table 1 Weight of quantitative evaluation index for managerial position in agricultural research institutes
目标层 Target layer | 准则层 Criterion layer | 方案层 Scenario layer | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
一级指标(权重) Frist-level indicator (weight) | 二级指标(权重) Second-level indicator (weight) | 组合权重 Combined weight | 三级指标(权重) Third-level indicator (weight) | 组合权重 Combined weight | ||
考核指标 Evaluation indicator | D:岗位影响 Job effect (0.191 6) | D2:正面影响 Positive effect (0.393 7) | 0.075 4 | D21:国家级及省部级个人称号荣誉 Personal hornor at national, provincal or ministerial level (0.502 4) | 0.037 9 | |
D22:院级个人称号荣誉 Personal honor at college or academy level (0.233 3) | 0.017 6 | |||||
D23:所级个人称号荣誉 Personal honor at institute level (0.134 1) | 0.010 1 | |||||
D24:部门集体荣誉 Collective honor of the department (0.130 2) | 0.009 8 | |||||
D3:负面影响 Negative effect (0.196 9) | 0.037 7 | D31:信访举报 Complaint reporting (0.248 0) | 0.009 3 | |||
D32:组织处理 Organization criticism (0.373 9) | 0.014 1 | |||||
D33:纪律处分 Disciplinary action (0.378 1) | 0.014 3 |
1 | 胡平波.支持合作社生态化建设的区域生态农业创新体系构建研究[J].农业经济问题,2018(12):94-106. |
HU P B. Study on the construction of the regional ecological agricultural innovation system in support of the ecological construction of cooperatives [J]. Issu. Agric. Econ., 2018(12):94-106. | |
2 | 李天宇,温珂,黄海,等.如何引进、用好和留住人才?——国家科研机构人才制度建设的国际经验与启示[J].中国科学院院刊,2022,37(9):1300-1310. |
LIT Y, WEN K, HUANG H G, et al. How to attract, recruit and retain talents? — experience and inspiration from national research institutes worldwide [J]. Bull. Chin. Acad. Sci., 2022, 37(9): 1300-1310. | |
3 | 李慧泉,毛世平.人力资源对中国农业科研院所创新效率的影响——兼论科技创新模式选择的重要性[J].科技管理研究,2020,40(12):96-103. |
LI H Q, MAO S P. Impact of human resources on innovation efficiency of agricultural research institutes in China: on importance of choice of scientific and technological innovation mode [J]. Sci. Technol. Manage. Res., 2020,40(12):96-103. | |
4 | 哈巍,于佳鑫.辅助人员对科研生产力的影响——以中国科学院为例[J].华东师范大学学报(教育科学版),2019,37(1):83-94, 168. |
HA W, YU J X. The effects of administrative support on faculty research productivity: an analysis of Chinese academy of sciences [J]. J. East China Norm. Univ. (Edu. Sci.), 2019,37(1):83-94, 168. | |
5 | 沈银书.关于农业科研院所推行绩效管理的几点思考[J].江苏农业科学,2015,43(12):591-594. |
SHEN Y S. Reflections on the implementation of performance management in agricultural research institutes [J]. Jiangsu Agric. Sci., 2015,43(12):591-594. | |
6 | 吴春,葛汉勤,王凯,等.地区农业科研单位科研管理人员专业化路径探析[J].江苏农业科学,2016,44(3):532-534. |
WU C, GE H Q, WANG K, et al. Study on professionalization path of scientific research managers in regional agricultural research institutions [J]. Jiangsu Agric. Sci., 2016,44(3):532-534. | |
7 | 邓莎丽. 高校科研机构绩效管理方案研究[D].成都:西南财经大学,2018. |
DENG S L. Research on the performance management scheme of university scientific research institutions [D]. Chengdu: Southwest University of Finance and Economics, 2018. | |
8 | 刘春妍,郝楠.农业科研单位科研管理岗位人员分类管理和评价体系构建初探[J].农业经济,2022, 421(5):120-121. |
LIU C Y, HAO N. Preliminary study on the construction of classified management and evaluation system for personnel in scientific research management positions in agricultural research institutions [J]. Agric. Econ., 2022, 421(5):120-121. | |
9 | 高旺盛,孙其信,陈源泉,等.世界农业强国评价指标构建与中国对标分析[J].中国农业大学学报,2023,28(11):1-13. |
GAO W S, SUN Q X, CHEN Y Q, et al.. Construction of the evaluation indicators and benchmark analysis of strength in agriculture [J]. J. China Agric. Univ., 2023,28(11):1-13. | |
10 | 刘云,王雪静,郭栋.新时代我国科技人才分类评价体系构建研究——以中国科协人才奖励为例[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2023,44(11):15-26. |
LIU Y, WANG X J, GUO D. Research on the construction of Chinese scientific and technological talents classification evaluation system in the new era: evidence from the talent award work of China association for science and technology [J]. Sci. Sci. Manage. S. T., 2023,44(11):15-26. | |
11 | 陆建中,李思经.农业科研机构自主创新能力评价指标体系研究[J].中国农业科技导报,2011,13(4):1-6. |
LU J Z, LI S J. Studies on evaluation index system of independent innovation capability for agricultural research institutions [J]. J. Agric. Sci. Technol., 2011,13(4):1-6. | |
12 | 马勋雕.智慧课堂师生互动评价指标体系构建及应用研究[D]. 吉林:东北师范大学,2023. |
MA X D. Research on construction and application of evaluation index system of teacher-student interaction in smart classroom [D]. Jilin: Northeast Normal University, 2023. | |
13 | 郑旭东.面向我国中小学教师的数字胜任力模型构建及应用研究[D].上海:华东师范大学,2019. |
ZHENG X D. Research on the construction and application of digital competency model for primary and secondary school teachers in China [D]. Shanghai: East China Normal University, 2019. | |
14 | 尹丽萍,马丽霞,郭瑞娥.关于提升科研行政管理水平的思考[J].科研管理,2016,37(S1):472-475. |
YIN L P, MA L X. Reflections on promoting administrative management levels in scientific research institutions [J]. Sci. Res. Manage., 2016,37(S1):472-475. | |
15 | 陆娣,岳铭鉴,付雪娇.农业科研院所科研管理中的问题与对策[J].农业科技与装备,2021, 303(3):82-83. |
LU D, YUE M J, FU X J. Problems and countermeasures of scientific research management in agricultural research institutes [J]. Agric. Sci. Technol. Equip., 2021, 303(3):82-83. | |
16 | 杨伟国,韩轶之.“人工匹配”与社会化人才开发新机制[J].中国人力资源开发,2021,38(10):78-90. |
YANG W G, HAN Y Z. “Human capital-task fit” and new mechanism of socialized talent development [J]. Hum. Resour. Dev. China, 2021,38(10):78-90. | |
17 | 徐晓敏.层次分析法的运用[J].统计与决策,2008(1):156-158. |
XU X M. Application of analytic hierarchy process [J]. Stat. Decis., 2008(1):156-158. | |
18 | 宋海艳,张轶华,黄镝,等.高校图书馆文献信息资源绩效管理体系构建研究[J].大学图书馆学报,2021,39(4):22-27. |
SONG H Y, ZHANG T H, HUANG D, et al.. Research on construction of performance management system of information resources in university libraries [J]. J. Acad. Libr., 2021,39(4):22-27. | |
19 | 黄广艺,彭碧琳,肖昕.新时期农业科研院所人力资源管理实践与思考——以广东省农业科学院为例[J].农业科技管理,2022,41(6):80-83. |
HUANG G Y, PENG B L, XIAO X. practice and thinking on human resource management in agricultural research institutes in the new era, taking Guangdong academy of agricultural sciences as an example [J]. Manage. Agric. Sci. Technol., 2022,41(6):80-83. | |
20 | 付亚和,许玉林. 绩效考核与绩效管理[M].北京:电子工业出版社,2008:1-265. |
[1] | Xin XIAN, Tong LI, Jianzhong LU. Ability of Agricultural Research Institutes Based on AHP to Transform Scientific and Technological Achievements Research on Evaluation Index System [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2023, 25(5): 8-23. |
[2] | LI Bo1,2, CHEN Rui1. Comprehensive Evaluation of Fishery Development Level in China Based on Entropy Weighted TOPSIS Index [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2016, 18(2): 165-175. |
[3] | LU Jian-zhong1, LI Si-jing2. Studies on Evaluation Index System of Independent Innovation Capability for Agricultural Research Institutions [J]. , 2011, 13(4): 1-6. |
Viewed | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Full text 94
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Abstract 210
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||