Effects of Different Rooting Reagents on Rooting of Miniature Potted Rose Cuttings

doi:10.13304/j.nykjdb.2022.0987

Abstract

Abstract:

Miniature potted rose has great ornamental value. At present， the industrialized production of miniature potted rose seedlings is low and the quality is uneven in the domestic cultivation and production， which seriously affects the commercial value of subsequent rose flowers. It is of great significance to study the cutting propagation technology of miniature potted roses to improve the quality of seedlings. To study the effects of different rooting reagent treatment on the growth and development of cutting seedling from 4 miniature potted rose varieties， different levels of Zhongshugenbao 201， indole-3-butyric acid （IBA）， 1-naphthlcetic acid （NAA）， 2，4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid（2，4-D） solution and combinations of reagents were set as treatments， and the water （CK1） and the company’s usual reagent （CK2， the rooting powder provided by Ziyu Flower Industry Co.， Ltd.） were used as controls. The root traits of cutting seedlings from 4 varieties were analyzed using principal component analysis， and the optimal rooting reagents treatment for cuttings was selected. The results showed that CK2 treatment had the best effect on promoting the growth and development of cutting seedling roots， and IBA and Zhongshugenbao 201 were followed. It was worth mentioning that most of the combination treatments of Zhongshugenbao 201 and IBA solution had good effects on the growth and development of cutting roots of 4 varieties， which were better than CK2， especially the combination of the 0.67 mL·L^-1 Zhongshugenbao 201 and 1 500 mg·L^-1 IBA， the root growth of cuttings in all tested varieties was excellent under this combination treatment.

Key words: miniature potted rose, cutting propagation, rooting reagent, growth and development of roots

摘要：

微型盆栽月季具有重要的观赏价值。目前在国内栽培生产中，微型盆栽月季种苗工厂化生产程度低、质量良莠不齐，严重影响了其成品花的商品价值。研究微型盆栽月季的扦插繁育技术以提高微型盆栽月季种苗的质量在微型盆栽月季栽培生产中具有重要的实践意义。为分析不同生根试剂对4个微型盆栽月季品种扦插生根的影响，设置不同水平的中蔬根保201、吲哚-3-丁酸（indole-3-butyric acid，IBA）、萘乙酸（1-naphthlcetic acid，NAA）、2，4-二氯苯氧乙酸（2，4-Dichlorophenoxyacetic acid，2，4-D）溶液以及部分试剂组合为生根试剂处理，并以清水（CK1）和公司常用试剂处理（CK2，由紫玉花卉产业有限公司提供的生根粉剂）为对照，利用主成分分析法对各品种扦插苗根系性状指标进行综合评价，以筛选扦插繁殖的最佳生根试剂。结果表明，在单一生根试剂处理中，CK2处理在所有品种均表现较优，能有效促进根系生长；另外， IBA和中蔬根保201溶液对扦插苗根系的生长发育也具有很好的促进作用，且它们的组合处理对所有供试品种的扦插苗根系生长发育也均有很好的促进效果，优于CK2。其中，0.67 mL·L^-1的中蔬根保201 溶液与1 500 mg·L^-1的IBA溶液的混合液处理所有品种扦插苗的根系生长情况都非常优异。

关键词: 微型盆栽月季, 扦插繁殖, 生根试剂, 根系生长发育

CLC Number:

S685.12

Li MA, Tingting CAO, Youwei FAN, Zhiyu REN, Chun LIU, Suxia YUAN. Effects of Different Rooting Reagents on Rooting of Miniature Potted Rose Cuttings[J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2024, 26(7): 50-60.

马力, 曹婷婷, 范又维, 任志雨, 刘春, 袁素霞. 不同生根试剂对微型盆栽月季扦插生根的影响[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2024, 26(7): 50-60.

Figures/Tables 14

References 32

1	李宝光,陈萍,吴罗发,等.江西盆栽微型月季轻简化育苗技术[J].黑龙江农业科学,2018(12):179-180.
	LI B G, CHEN P, WU L F, et al.. Simplified seedling technology of potted miniature rose Jiangxi [J]. Heilongjiang Agric. Sci., 2018 (12):179-180.
2	HU D, HE X R, MA Y Z, et al.. Effects of ABT on the morphogenesis and inclusions of Taxus chinensis (Pilger) Rehd f. baokangsis cutting rooting [J/OL]. Notulae Botanicae Hortic. Agrobotanici Cluj-Napoca, 2021, 49(2):12200 [2022-10-15]..
3	SEDAGHATHOOR S, KAYGHOBADI S, TAJVAR Y. Rooting of Mugo pine (Pinus mugo) cuttings as affected by IBA, NAA and planting substrate [J/OL]. For. Syst., 2016, 25(2):eSC08 [2022-10-15]. .
4	TIWARI J K, AMEEN G, SANDILYA V K, et al.. Effect of IBA on root development and associated biochemical changes in single-and double-node stem-cuttings of spine gourd [J]. Veget. Sci., 2022, 49(1):33-40.
5	贺爱国,戴艳娇,胡志鑫,等.不同pH条件下IBA和NAA对伴矿景天生根的影响研究[J].中国农学通报,2020,36(22):49-54.
	HE A G, DAI Y J, HU Z X, et al.. Effect of IBA and NAA on root development of sedum plumbizincicola under different pH [J]. Chin. Agric. Sci. Bull., 2020, 36(22):49-54.
6	徐珊珊,刘小金,徐大平,等. IAA和NAA对降香黄檀扦插繁殖的影响[J].林业科学研究,2021,34(5):168-176.
	XU S S, LIU X J, XU D P, et al.. Influence of IAA and NAA on cutting propagation of Dalbergia odorifera [J]. For. Res., 2021, 34(5):168-176.
7	张杰,李健康,段安安,等.不同质量浓度NAA、IBA对栓皮栎、蒙古栎黄化嫩枝扦插生根的影响[J].北京林业大学学报,2019,41(7):128-138.
	ZHANG J, LI J K, DUAN A A, et al.. Effects of different concentrations of IBA, NAA on rooting of etiolated shoots of Quercus variabilis and Quercus mongolica [J]. J. Beijing For. Univ., 2019, 41(7):128-138.
8	王云云,马珊珊,张旌,等.不同抗寒性月季品系的组织培养[J].分子植物育种,2022,20(4):1264-1272.
	WANG Y Y, MA S S, ZHANG J, et al.. The tissue culture on different cold tolerance rose lines [J]. Mol. Plant Breed., 2022, 20(4):1264-1272.
9	阎增洁,李慧敏,杨萍,等.植物生长调节剂对香水月季原变种扦插生根的影响[J].江西农业学报,2020,32(7):41-44.
	YAN Z J, LI H M, YANG P, et al.. Effects of plant growth regulators on cutting propagation of Rosa odorata var. Odorata [J]. Acta Agric. Jiangxi, 2020, 32(7):41-44.
10	赵春莉,杨朝苹,刘子平,等.正交设计优化红双喜月季扦插繁殖技术研究[J].安徽农业科学,2021,49(22):70-73.
	ZHAO C L, YANG C P, LIU Z P, et al.. Orthogonal design optimization of red double delight Rosa chinensis cutting propagation technology [J]. J. Anhui Agric. Sci., 2021, 49(22):70-73.
11	陈妹姑,林兴娥,李新国,等.基于主成分分析和聚类分析的榴莲品质综合评价[J].食品工业科技,2023,44(7):278-286.
	CHEN M G, LIN X E, LI X G, et al.. Comprehensive evaluation of durian quality based on principal component analysis and cluster analysis [J]. Sci. Tech. Food Ind., 2023, 44(7):278-286.
12	詹磊,徐卓越,蓝国玮,等.基于主成分分析构建混合多糖凝胶品质综合评价模型[J].现代食品科技, 2023,39(4):214-223.
	ZHAN L, XU Z Y, LAN G W, et al.. Constructing a comprehensive evaluation model for assessing the quality of mixed polysaccharide gels on principal component analysis [J]. Mod. Food Sci. Technol., 2023, 39(4):214-223.
13	陈佩.主成分分析法研究及其在特征提取中的应用[D].西安:陕西师范大学,2014.
	CHEN P. Research on principal component analysis and its application in feature extraction [D]. Xi’an: Shaanxi Normal University, 2014.
14	王俊花,邵林生,闫建宾,等.基于主成分分析的糯玉米杂交组合农艺性状综合评价[J].山西农业科学,2022,50(7):938-944.
	WANG J H, SHAO L S, YAN J B, et al.. Comprehensive evaluation of agronomic traits based on principal component analysis of waxy cross combinations [J]. J. Shanxi Agric. Sci., 2022, 50(7):938-944.
15	李琼,常世豪,舒文涛,等.黄淮海地区夏大豆(南片)46份大豆品种(系)农艺性状综合分析[J].新疆农业科学,2021,58(10):1765-1774.
	LI Q, CHANG S H, SHU W T, et al.. Comprehensive analysis of agronomic characters of 46 soybean varieties (lines) of summer soybeans (south) in Huang-huai-hai region [J]. Xinjiang Agric. Sci., 2021, 58(10):1765-1774.
16	倪永静,姜晓君,卢祖权,等. 30份国内外小麦种质资源主要农艺性状的分析与评价[J].中国农学通报,2020,36(3):16-22.
	NI Y J, JIANG X J, LU Z Q, et al.. 30 worldwide wheat germplasm resources: analysis and evaluation of main agronomic traits [J]. Chin. Agric. Sci. Bull., 2020, 36(3):16-22.
17	SANTHY V, RATHINAVEL K, SARAVANAN M, et al.. Genetic diversity assessment of extant cotton varieties based on principal component analysis (PCA) and cluster analysis of enlisted DUS traits [J]. Elect. J. Plant Breed., 2020, 11(2):430-438.
18	吴超,郭方其,彭娟,等.国外微型月季品种资源主要表型分析及综合评价[J].分子植物育种,2018,16(8):2646-2655.
	WU C, GUO F Q, PENG J, et al.. Main phenotypic analysis and comprehensive evaluation of miniature rose cultivars in foreign countries [J]. Mol. Plant Breeding, 2018, 16(8):2646-2655.
19	韩霜.22个菊花品种耐阴指标筛选与综合评价分析[J].河北农业大学学报,2015,38(6):46-51.
	HAN S. Low light tolerance screening and comprehensive evaluation of twenty-two chrysanthemum cultivars [J]. J. Agric. Univ. Hebei, 2015, 38(6):46-51.
20	廖伟彪,张美玲,杨永花,等.植物生长调节剂浓度和处理时间对月季扦插生根的影响[J].甘肃农业大学学报,2012,47(3):47-51.
	LIAO W B, ZHANG M L, YANG Y H, et al.. Effects of different plant growth regulator concentrations and processing times on rooting of Rosa Chinensis cuttings [J]. J. Gansu Agric. Univ., 2012, 47(3):47-51.
21	闫海霞,卢家仕,黄昌艳,等.萘乙酸和吲哚丁酸对月季扦插成活效果的影响[J].南方农业学报,2013,44(11):1870-1873.
	YAN H X, LU J S, HUANG C Y, et al.. Effects of NAA and IBA on survival of rose hardwood cutting [J]. J. Southern Agric., 2013, 44(11):1870-1873.
22	曾斌,黄国林,张力,等.9种微型月季嫩枝扦插的生根和萌梢能力差异[J].湖南农业科学,2018(4):62-64.
	ZENG B, HUANG G L, ZHANG L, et al.. Difference of rooting and shoot ability of 9 miniature rose cuttings [J]. Hunan Agric. Sci., 2018(4):62-64.
23	OLAETXEA M, MORA V, BACAICOA E, et al.. Root ABA and H⁺‐ATPase are key players in the root and shoot growth‐promoting action of humic acids [J/OL]. Plant Direct, 2019, 3(10): e00175 [2022-10-15]. .
24	刘伟,刘景辉,萨如拉,等.腐殖酸水溶肥料对水分胁迫下小麦光合特性及产量的影响[J].中国农学通报,2014,30(3):196-200.
	LIU W, LIU J H, SA R L, et al.. Effect of humic acid water-soluble fertilizer on wheat photosynthetic characteristics and yield under water stress [J]. Chin. Agric. Sci. Bull., 2014, 30(3):196-200.
25	张宗彩,肖朋,高进华,等.矿源黄腐酸钾对水培绿萝生根发芽影响的研究[J].肥料与健康,2021,48(3):67-71.
	ZHANG Z C, XIAO P, GAO J H, et al.. Study on the effect of mineral potassium fulvic acid on rooting and sprouting of hydroponic Epipremnum Aureum [J]. Fert. Health, 2021, 48(3):67-71.
26	刘杰,张雄杰,盛晋华,等.肥料类型对盐碱地蒙古黄芪生长与光合特征及药材产量和品质的影响[J].西北植物学报,2021,41(6):1012-1018.
	LIU J, ZHANG X J, SHENG J H, et al.. Effects of fertilizer types on growth, photosynthesis, yield and quality of Astragalus membranaceus var. mongholicus in saline-alkali land [J]. Acta Bot. Bor-Occid. Sin., 2021, 41(6):1012-1018.
27	吴晓霞,周倩,谢虹,等. 2,4-D和NAA在拟南芥细胞分裂和伸长中的作用分析[J].西北植物学报,2007,27(8):1631-1636.
	WU X X, ZHOU Q, XIE H, et al.. Different effects of 2,4-D and NAA on cell division and elongation in Arabidopsis suspension cells [J]. Acta Bot. Bor-Occid. Sin., 2007,27(8):1631-1636.
28	姚庆收,姜吉刚,单长民,等.花生毛状根的高频诱导及NAA和2,4-D对花生毛状根生长和白藜芦醇含量的影响[J].药物生物技术,2012,19(6):507-511.
	YAO Q S, JIANG J G, SHAN C M, et al.. High frequency induction of hairy roots and effect of NAA and 2,4-D on peanut hairy roots growth and resveratrol content [J]. Pharma Ceutical Biotech., 2012, 19(6):507-511.
29	DAMAYANTI P, LATUNRA A I, JOHANES E. Embryogenic callus induction of todolo toraja coffee leaf cells (Coffea arabica var. Typica) with the addition of 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid (2,4-D) and furfurylaminopurine (Kinetin) in vitro [C]//IOP Conference Series:Earth and Environmental Science, IOP Publishing, 2021:12044-12051.
30	龚仲幸.植物生长调节剂对藤本月季扦插生根的影响[J].安徽农业科学,2014, 42(28):9719-9724.
	GONG Z X. Effects of plant growth regulators on rooting of vine Rosa Chinensis cuttings [J]. J. Anhui Agric. Sci., 2014, 42(28):9719-9724.
31	瞿辉,邵和平,叶晓青,等.不同生长素处理对2个微型月季品种扦插生根的影响[J].江苏农业科学,2018,46(19):159-162.
	QU H, SHAO H P, YE X Q, et al.. Impacts of different auxin treatments on cutting rootingof two mini-rose cultivars [J]. Jiangsu Agric. Sci., 2018, 46(19):159-162.
32	王红梅,管斌.现代月季‘大游行’扦插繁殖对比试验[J].浙江林业科技,2020,40(1):70-75.
	WANG H M, GUAN B. Comparative experiment on propagation by cutting of Rosa hybrida ‘Parade’ [J]. J. Zhejiang For. Sci. Technol., 2018, 46(19):159-162.

处理Treatment	生根试剂Rooting reagent	含量 Content
CK1	清水Water	—
CK2	生根粉剂Rooting powder	—
Tr1	中蔬根保201 Zhongshugenbao 201	2.00 mL·L^-1
Tr2		1.00 m L·L^-1
Tr3		0.67 m L·L^-1
Tr4	IBA	500 mg·L^-1
Tr5		1 000 mg·L^-1
Tr6		1 500 mg·L^-1
Tr7	NAA	300 mg·L^-1
Tr8		800 mg·L^-1
Tr9		1 300 mg·L^-1
Tr10	2，4-D	100 mg·L^-1
Tr11		300 mg·L^-1
Tr12		500 mg·L^-1
Tr13	中蔬根保201+IBA Zhongshugenbao 201+IBA	2.00 mL·L^-1+500 mg·L^-1
Tr14		2.00 mL·L^-1+1 000 mg·L^-1
Tr15		2.00 mL·L^-1+1 500 mg·L^-1
Tr16		1.00 mL·L^-1+500 mg·L^-1
Tr17		1.00 mL·L^-1+1 000 mg·L^-1
Tr18		1.00 mL·L^-1+1 500 mg·L^-1
Tr19		0.67 mL·L^-1+500 mg·L^-1
Tr20		0.67 mL·L^-1+1 000 mg·L^-1
Tr21		0.67 mL·L^-1+1 500 mg·L^-1

处理Treatment	生根试剂Rooting reagent	含量 Content
CK1	清水Water	—
CK2	生根粉剂Rooting powder	—
Tr1	中蔬根保201 Zhongshugenbao 201	2.00 mL·L^-1
Tr2		1.00 m L·L^-1
Tr3		0.67 m L·L^-1
Tr4	IBA	500 mg·L^-1
Tr5		1 000 mg·L^-1
Tr6		1 500 mg·L^-1
Tr7	NAA	300 mg·L^-1
Tr8		800 mg·L^-1
Tr9		1 300 mg·L^-1
Tr10	2，4-D	100 mg·L^-1
Tr11		300 mg·L^-1
Tr12		500 mg·L^-1
Tr13	中蔬根保201+IBA Zhongshugenbao 201+IBA	2.00 mL·L^-1+500 mg·L^-1
Tr14		2.00 mL·L^-1+1 000 mg·L^-1
Tr15		2.00 mL·L^-1+1 500 mg·L^-1
Tr16		1.00 mL·L^-1+500 mg·L^-1
Tr17		1.00 mL·L^-1+1 000 mg·L^-1
Tr18		1.00 mL·L^-1+1 500 mg·L^-1
Tr19		0.67 mL·L^-1+500 mg·L^-1
Tr20		0.67 mL·L^-1+1 000 mg·L^-1
Tr21		0.67 mL·L^-1+1 500 mg·L^-1

处理 Treatment	Apollo Jewel			Rose Terrazza Pisce			Juicy Terrazza			Cinderella
处理 Treatment	根数 Number of roots	根鲜重 Fresh root weight/g	生根率 Rooting rate/%	根数 Number of roots	根鲜重 Fresh root weight/g	生根率 Rooting rate/%	根数 Number of roots	根鲜重 Fresh root weight/g	生根率 Rooting rate/%	根数 Number of roots	根鲜重 Fresh root weight/g	生根率 Rooting rate/%
CK1	8.44±0.45 c	0.34±0.02 c	100.00±0.00 a	3.91±0.41 def	0.32±0.02 f	93.33±3.33 abcd	6.51±0.44 defg	0.46±0.03 bcd	97.78±2.22 ab	6.84±0.26 fgh	0.42±0.02 bcd	100.00±0.00 a
CK2	8.53±0.39 c	0.41±0.02 bc	100.00±0.00 a	6.49±0.34 bc	0.42±0.02 cde	100.00±0.00 a	11.84±0.60 b	0.54±0.02 b	100.00±0.00 a	9.36±0.54 bc	0.33±0.03 ef	100.00±0.00 a
Tr1	7.60±0.57 cde	0.43±0.03 bc	95.56±2.94 a	3.04±0.27 f	0.28±0.02 f	88.89±3.51 abcde	8.11±0.42 cd	0.45±0.02 cd	100.00±0.00 a	6.93±0.42 fgh	0.45±0.03 abc	100.00±0.00 a
Tr2	8.22±0.41 cd	0.44±0.02 bc	100.00±0.00 a	3.00±0.42 f	0.33±0.03 f	88.89±3.51 abcde	7.51±0.38 cdef	0.45±0.02 cd	100.00±0.00 a	6.07±0.30 h	0.42±0.04 bcd	93.33±3.33 b
Tr3	7.24±0.51 cde	0.34±0.02 c	97.78±2.22 a	3.78±0.32 ef	0.34±0.03 ef	95.56±2.94 abc	6.07±0.32 efg	0.41±0.02 cd	100.00±0.00 a	6.33±0.21 gh	0.43±0.02 abcd	100.00±0.00 a
Tr4	9.02±0.58 c	0.50±0.03 b	97.78±2.22 a	6.76±0.52 b	0.44±0.02 bcd	97.78±2.22 ab	8.73±0.38 c	0.39±0.02 d	100.00±0.00 a	10.00±0.52 b	0.33±0.01 ef	100.00±0.00 a
Tr5	12.20±0.91 b	0.61±0.04 a	95.56±2.94 a	9.84±0.72 a	0.53±0.04 a	95.56±2.94 abc	12.16±1.12 b	0.49±0.02 bc	100.00±0.00 a	14.53±0.83 a	0.50±0.04 ab	100.00±0.00 a
Tr6	15.11±1.22 a	0.68±0.03 a	100.00±0.00 a	10.04±0.75 a	0.49±0.02 abc	82.22±4.01 cdef	16.73±1.18 a	0.66±0.05 a	100.00±0.00 a	15.27±0.68 a	0.46±0.04 abc	95.56±2.94 ab
Tr7	5.58±0.35 e	0.49±0.05 b	80.00±5.77 a	5.07±0.44 cde	0.51±0.04 ab	91.11±4.84 abcd	5.47±0.31 g	0.44±0.03 cd	80.00±0.00 a	7.67±0.30 defg	0.52±0.02 a	100.00±0.00 a
Tr8	6.38±0.45 de	0.48±0.02 b	91.11±3.51 ab	4.09±0.34 def	0.43±0.02 bcd	80.00±4.71 def	5.58±0.55 fg	0.40±0.03 d	93.33±4.71 bc	8.22±0.52 cdef	0.40±0.03 cde	100.00±0.00 a
Tr9	5.64±0.74 e	0.43±0.08 bc	84.44±8.68 ab	5.33±0.36 bcd	0.50±0.04 abc	73.33±4.71 f	5.36±0.27 g	0.44±0.02 cd	91.11±3.51 c	8.73±0.40 bcd	0.46±0.02 abc	100.00± 0.00 a
Tr10	3.13±0.44 f	0.19±0.03 d	46.67±6.67 c	5.96±0.61 bc	0.37±0.04 def	84.44±7.29 bcdef	8.78±0.63 c	0.38±0.02 d	80.00±0.00 d	8.53±0.36 cde	0.46±0.02 abc	95.56±2.94 ab
Tr11	1.24±0.44 f	0.08±0.03 d	15.56±4.44 d	6.24±0.64 bc	0.29±0.03 f	57.78±5.21 g	7.69±0.67 cde	0.27±0.03 e	44.44±2.94 e	8.84±0.20 bcd	0.35±0.02 def	100.00±0.00 a
Tr12	2.36±0.96 f	0.13±0.06 d	28.89±10.60 d	6.56±0.39 bc	0.30±0.02 f	75.56±5.56 ef	2.49±0.79 h	0.09±0.02 f	15.56±2.94 f	7.29±0.39 efgh	0.30±0.02 f	84.44±2.94 c

处理 Treatment	Apollo Jewel			Rose Terrazza Pisce			Juicy Terrazza			Cinderella
处理 Treatment	根数 Number of roots	根鲜重 Fresh root weight/g	生根率 Rooting rate/%	根数 Number of roots	根鲜重 Fresh root weight/g	生根率 Rooting rate/%	根数 Number of roots	根鲜重 Fresh root weight/g	生根率 Rooting rate/%	根数 Number of roots	根鲜重 Fresh root weight/g	生根率 Rooting rate/%
CK1	8.44±0.45 c	0.34±0.02 c	100.00±0.00 a	3.91±0.41 def	0.32±0.02 f	93.33±3.33 abcd	6.51±0.44 defg	0.46±0.03 bcd	97.78±2.22 ab	6.84±0.26 fgh	0.42±0.02 bcd	100.00±0.00 a
CK2	8.53±0.39 c	0.41±0.02 bc	100.00±0.00 a	6.49±0.34 bc	0.42±0.02 cde	100.00±0.00 a	11.84±0.60 b	0.54±0.02 b	100.00±0.00 a	9.36±0.54 bc	0.33±0.03 ef	100.00±0.00 a
Tr1	7.60±0.57 cde	0.43±0.03 bc	95.56±2.94 a	3.04±0.27 f	0.28±0.02 f	88.89±3.51 abcde	8.11±0.42 cd	0.45±0.02 cd	100.00±0.00 a	6.93±0.42 fgh	0.45±0.03 abc	100.00±0.00 a
Tr2	8.22±0.41 cd	0.44±0.02 bc	100.00±0.00 a	3.00±0.42 f	0.33±0.03 f	88.89±3.51 abcde	7.51±0.38 cdef	0.45±0.02 cd	100.00±0.00 a	6.07±0.30 h	0.42±0.04 bcd	93.33±3.33 b
Tr3	7.24±0.51 cde	0.34±0.02 c	97.78±2.22 a	3.78±0.32 ef	0.34±0.03 ef	95.56±2.94 abc	6.07±0.32 efg	0.41±0.02 cd	100.00±0.00 a	6.33±0.21 gh	0.43±0.02 abcd	100.00±0.00 a
Tr4	9.02±0.58 c	0.50±0.03 b	97.78±2.22 a	6.76±0.52 b	0.44±0.02 bcd	97.78±2.22 ab	8.73±0.38 c	0.39±0.02 d	100.00±0.00 a	10.00±0.52 b	0.33±0.01 ef	100.00±0.00 a
Tr5	12.20±0.91 b	0.61±0.04 a	95.56±2.94 a	9.84±0.72 a	0.53±0.04 a	95.56±2.94 abc	12.16±1.12 b	0.49±0.02 bc	100.00±0.00 a	14.53±0.83 a	0.50±0.04 ab	100.00±0.00 a
Tr6	15.11±1.22 a	0.68±0.03 a	100.00±0.00 a	10.04±0.75 a	0.49±0.02 abc	82.22±4.01 cdef	16.73±1.18 a	0.66±0.05 a	100.00±0.00 a	15.27±0.68 a	0.46±0.04 abc	95.56±2.94 ab
Tr7	5.58±0.35 e	0.49±0.05 b	80.00±5.77 a	5.07±0.44 cde	0.51±0.04 ab	91.11±4.84 abcd	5.47±0.31 g	0.44±0.03 cd	80.00±0.00 a	7.67±0.30 defg	0.52±0.02 a	100.00±0.00 a
Tr8	6.38±0.45 de	0.48±0.02 b	91.11±3.51 ab	4.09±0.34 def	0.43±0.02 bcd	80.00±4.71 def	5.58±0.55 fg	0.40±0.03 d	93.33±4.71 bc	8.22±0.52 cdef	0.40±0.03 cde	100.00±0.00 a
Tr9	5.64±0.74 e	0.43±0.08 bc	84.44±8.68 ab	5.33±0.36 bcd	0.50±0.04 abc	73.33±4.71 f	5.36±0.27 g	0.44±0.02 cd	91.11±3.51 c	8.73±0.40 bcd	0.46±0.02 abc	100.00± 0.00 a
Tr10	3.13±0.44 f	0.19±0.03 d	46.67±6.67 c	5.96±0.61 bc	0.37±0.04 def	84.44±7.29 bcdef	8.78±0.63 c	0.38±0.02 d	80.00±0.00 d	8.53±0.36 cde	0.46±0.02 abc	95.56±2.94 ab
Tr11	1.24±0.44 f	0.08±0.03 d	15.56±4.44 d	6.24±0.64 bc	0.29±0.03 f	57.78±5.21 g	7.69±0.67 cde	0.27±0.03 e	44.44±2.94 e	8.84±0.20 bcd	0.35±0.02 def	100.00±0.00 a
Tr12	2.36±0.96 f	0.13±0.06 d	28.89±10.60 d	6.56±0.39 bc	0.30±0.02 f	75.56±5.56 ef	2.49±0.79 h	0.09±0.02 f	15.56±2.94 f	7.29±0.39 efgh	0.30±0.02 f	84.44±2.94 c

品种 Variety	指标Index
Apollo Jewel	根鲜重Fresh root weight	0.888^**
Apollo Jewel	生根率Rooting rate	0.798^**	0.823^**
Rose Terrazza Pisce	根鲜重Fresh root weight	0.570^*
Rose Terrazza Pisce	生根率Rooting rate	-0.042	0.245
Juicy Terrazza	根鲜重Fresh root weight	0.763^**
Juicy Terrazza	生根率Rooting rate	0.489	0.856^**
Cinderella	根鲜重Fresh root weight	0.226
Cinderella	生根率Rooting rate	0.107	0.363