中国农业科技导报 ›› 2018, Vol. 20 ›› Issue (4): 12-19.DOI: 10.13304/j.nykjdb.2017.0495

• 农业创新论坛 • 上一篇    下一篇

基因组编辑技术及其安全评价管理

焦悦1,吴刚2,黄耀辉1,熊鹂1,翟勇1*   

  1. 1. 农业部科技发展中心, 北京 100176; 2.中国农业科学院油料作物研究所, 武汉 430062
  • 收稿日期:2017-08-01 出版日期:2018-04-15 发布日期:2017-10-14
  • 通讯作者: 翟勇,研究员,博士,主要从事转基因生物安全评价与管理研究。E-mail:zhaiyong5085@163.com
  • 作者简介:焦悦,农艺师,博士,主要从事转基因生物安全评价与管理研究。E-mail:jiaoyue@agri.gov.cn。
  • 基金资助:
    国家转基因生物新品种培育重大专项(2018ZX08011-04B)资助。

Genome Editing Technology and Its Safety Assessment Management

JIAO Yue1, WU Gang2, HUANG Yaohui1, XIONG Li1, ZHAI Yong1*   

  1. 1.Development Center for Science and Technology, Ministry of Agriculture, Beijing 100176;2.Oil Crops Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Wuhan 430062, China
  • Received:2017-08-01 Online:2018-04-15 Published:2017-10-14

摘要: 基因组编辑技术解决了常规育种需要多代杂交、所需时间长的问题,加快了育种进程;同时,由于人为增加突变效率、存在脱靶效应等也带来了潜在的安全性问题。简要概述了3 种基因组编辑技术的原理和优缺点,并通过基因组编辑技术与传统育种技术和转基因技术的比较分析,讨论了基因组编辑技术及其产品的优势和可能因脱靶效应而引发的生物安全风险。同时,介绍了世界主要国家对基因组编辑植物的监管模式和相关政策,并结合我国现行法规对转基因生物的定义和风险评估的原则,讨论了基因组编辑技术及其产品的安全评价管理,初步提出了基因组编辑植物的安全评价管理思路。

关键词: 基因组编辑, 植物, 安全评价

Abstract: Genome editing technologies have saved the long time period of multi-generation hybridization needed by conventional breeding; thus, speeded up the breeding process. At the same time, there are potential risks due to the artificial increase of mutation efficiency and existence of off-target effects. Herein, this paper brievely reviewed the principles, merits and demerits of the 3 mainly technologies in genome editing; compared them with the conventional breeding method and transgenetic technology, and discussed the advanteges of genome editing techniques and their products and the possible biological safety risks caused by off-target effect. The regulatory models and related policies of genome editing plants in the worlds major countries were also elaborated. Finally, the paper discussed the safety assessment of genome editing technique in China combined with Chinese current regulations on definition of transgenic plants and principles of risk assessment. Before ending, the paper put forward thonghts on managing safety assessment of genome editing plants.

Key words: genome editing, plants, safety assessment