7个谷子杂交种及其亲本的抗旱性分析

doi:10.13304/j.nykjdb.2019.0545

中国农业科技导报 ›› 2020, Vol. 22 ›› Issue (7): 20-28.DOI: 10.13304/j.nykjdb.2019.0545

7个谷子杂交种及其亲本的抗旱性分析

李会霞1§，郑植尹2§，田岗1，刘鑫1，王玉文1，刘红1，史关燕3*

1. 山西省农业科学院谷子研究所，山西长治 046011；2.青海大学农牧学院，西宁 810016；3.山西省农业科学院经济作物研究所，山西汾阳 032200

收稿日期:2019-07-04 出版日期:2020-07-15 发布日期:2020-08-16
通讯作者: *通信作者史关燕 Email：jzsguanyan@126.com
作者简介:§李会霞与郑植尹为本文共同第一作者。李会霞 Email：nkygzslhx@163.com；郑植尹 E-mail：2196104760@qq.com
基金资助:
山西省农业科学院育种工程项目（17yzgc0262，17yzgc0261）；山西省重点研发计划重点项目（201703D2110026，201703D211008，201803D2210193）；国家谷子高粱产业技术体系（CARS06135A23）；山西省农业科学院创新项目（YCX2018414，YGC2019KQ01，YCX2019T05）。

Drought Resistance Analysis of 7 Foxtail Millet Hybrids and Their Parents

LI Huixia1§, ZHENG Zhiyin2§, TIAN Gang1, LIU Xin1, WANG Yuwen1, LIU Hong1, SHI Guanyan3*

1. Millet Research Institute, Shanxi Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Shanxi Changzhi 046000, China; 2. College of Agriculture and Animal Husbandry, inghai University, Xining 810016, China; 3. Institute of Industrial Crop，Shanxi Academy of Agricultural Sciences，Shanxi Fenyang 032200, China

Received:2019-07-04 Online:2020-07-15 Published:2020-08-16

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

培育抗旱品种是降低干旱导致减产的最重要途径。为评价7个谷子杂交种及其亲本的抗旱性，调查并检测谷子植株在拔节期、抽穗前期、盛花期3个时期离土12 h的相对含水量（relative water content, RWC)、根冠比（root top ratio, R/T）、产量的抗旱指数（desiccation index, DI）等指标。结果表明：干旱胁迫条件下，长杂谷466、长杂谷333和17-400在植株离土12 h后不同时期的RWC均值都较高，分别为5690%、5452%和5427%。在干旱胁迫下，17-400、长杂谷333和长杂谷281的R/T平均值较大，分别为0223、0218和0217。杂交种在3个生育时期根冠比（R/T）在干旱胁迫处理与对照处理的差值(D)幅度最小的为长杂谷466，D值平均为0015，其次是长杂谷281和17-400，D值平均为0031和0032；父本的D值幅度基本与其杂交种的D值幅度一致（相关系数为0818 5）。小区产量抗旱指数最高的杂交种为长杂谷466，DI值为1019，抗旱级别为强，抗旱性级别中等的杂交种有17-400、长杂谷281、长杂谷333。杂交种的抗旱性与父本的抗旱性有一定相关关系。研究结果为抗旱谷子杂交种选育提供一定的理论依据。

关键词: 谷子, 杂交种, 保水力, 根冠比, 抗旱指数

Abstract: Breeding for droughttolerant millet variety is the most important way to alleviate yield reduction caused by drought stress. Drought resistance of 7 millet hybrids and their parents was evaluated by investigating and testing their relative water content (RWC) of plants dug out from the soil after 12 h, and their root top ratio (R/T) in jointing stage, early heading stage and peak flower stage, and their drought resistance index (DI) of yield. The results showed that under drought stress conditions, Changzagu 466, Changzagu 333 and 17-400 had higher average value of RWC after plant leaving soil for 12 h in different growth stages. They were 5690%, 5452% and 5427%, respectively. Under drought stress conditions, 17-400, Changzagu 333, and Changzagu 281 had higher average value of R/T. They were 0223, 0218 and 0217, respectively. Changzagu 466 had the smallest difference value of R/T between treatments of drought stress and CK(D) in three growth stages. The average value of D was 0015. Changzagu 281 and 17-400 came the second. The average value of D of them were 0031and 0032, respectively. The value of D of male parents were basically consistent with their hybrids (correlation coefficient was 0818 5). Changzagu 466 had the highest drought DI. The DI value was 1019. Moderate drought resistant hybrids were 17-400, Changzagu 281 and Changzagu 333. There was certain correlation between the drought resistance of hybrids and their male parents. These findings provided a theoretical basis and guidance recommendations for breeding of droughtresistant millet hybrids.

Key words: foxtail millet, hybrid, water retaining capacity, root top ratio, drought resistance index

李会霞1§，郑植尹2§，田岗1，刘鑫1，王玉文1，刘红1，史关燕3*. 7个谷子杂交种及其亲本的抗旱性分析[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2020, 22(7): 20-28.

LI Huixia1§, ZHENG Zhiyin2§, TIAN Gang1, LIU Xin1, WANG Yuwen1, LIU Hong1, SHI Guanyan3*.

Drought Resistance Analysis of 7 Foxtail Millet Hybrids and Their Parents

[J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2020, 22(7): 20-28.

[1]	焦雄飞, 于晋, 冯乐勇, 郭耀东, 樊丽生. 不同播期对谷子DUS测试性状的影响[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2022, 24(8): 55-64.
[2]	鱼冰星, 王宏富, 王振华, 张鹏, 成锴, 余爱丽, 闫海丽, 鱼冰洁. 多效唑对谷子茎秆特征及抗倒性的影响[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2021, 23(8): 37-44.
[3]	李冉, 刘宇航, 梁杉, 张敏, . 硒肥对谷子产量因子及其籽粒富硒效果的影响[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2021, 23(6): 140-146.
[4]	张宇杰, 郭平毅, 郭美俊, 周浩, 原向阳, 董淑琦, 王玉国. 外源硒矿粉对谷子保护酶活性、产量和籽粒中硒含量的影响[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2021, 23(5): 153-159.
[5]	岳琳祺,郭佳晖,白雄辉,施卫萍,郭平毅,郭杰. 叶面喷施硒肥对不同基因型谷子农艺性状及籽粒硒含量的影响[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2021, 23(4): 154-163.
[6]	田岗, 刘鑫, 王玉文, 刘永忠, 李会霞, 成锴, 王振华, 刘红. 遮光处理对谷子农艺性状、小米品质及蒸煮特性的影响[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2021, 23(11): 47-54.
[7]	相吉山1,张恒儒2,刘涵1,索良喜2,贾姝婧1,张颖1,史景奇1,胡利喆1,蔡一宁1. 不同生态区谷子种质资源表型比较分析[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2020, 22(9): 31-41.
[8]	李智，王宏富*，王钰云，杨净，鱼冰星，黄珊珊. 谷子大豆间作对作物光合特性及产量的影响[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2020, 22(6): 168-175.
[9]	王钰云，王宏富*，李智，段宏凯，黄珊珊. 谷子花生间作对谷子光合特性及产量的影响[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2020, 22(5): 153-165.
[10]	王振华,刘鑫*,余爱丽,成锴,李会霞,田岗,王玉文,陈新霞,张鹏,刘红. 不同谷子品种萌发期对干旱胁迫生理响应的变化及抗旱指标筛选[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2020, 22(12): 39-49.
[11]	秦岭,陈二影,杨延兵,张艳亭,孔清华,张华文,王海莲,王润丰,管延安*. 干旱和复水对不同耐旱型谷子品种苗期生理指标的影响[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2019, 21(3): 146-151.
[12]	赵艳1,生云龙1,宋亚菲1,张佳阔1,瓮巧云1,袁进成1,赵治海2,刘颖慧1. 谷子超氧化物歧化酶基因家族生物信息学分析[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2018, 20(8): 1-6.
[13]	徐峰1,索良喜1,孟海龙2,李桂红1,程凯2,张佳乐2,贾斌2,王冬雪2,相吉山2*. 不同来源谷子品种产量比较及综合评价[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2018, 20(5): 100-110.
[14]	张金玲,张艳阳,张叶,彭媛,王君焕,宋晋辉*,刘岩. 张家口地区谷子主栽品种萌发期抗旱性评价[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2017, 19(4): 65-72.
[15]	崔纪菡1,2§,赵静1§,孟建3,刘猛1,赵宇1,. 铵态氮和硝态氮对谷子形态和生物量的影响研究[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2017, 19(10): 66-72.

7个谷子杂交种及其亲本的抗旱性分析

Drought Resistance Analysis of 7 Foxtail Millet Hybrids and Their Parents

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics