印度鹰嘴豆资源遗传多样性分析及优异资源筛选#br#

doi:10.13304/j.nykjdb.2020.0861

中国农业科技导报 ›› 2021, Vol. 23 ›› Issue (7): 54-64.DOI: 10.13304/j.nykjdb.2020.0861

印度鹰嘴豆资源遗传多样性分析及优异资源筛选#br#

于海天1,吕梅媛1,万述伟2,杨峰1,胡朝芹1,杨新1,张晓艳2,王玉宝1,何春华3,林德明3,王丽萍1*

1.云南省农业科学院粮食作物研究所, 昆明 650205； 2.青岛市农业科学研究院, 山东青岛 266100; 3.曲靖市马龙区鸡头村街道城镇和社区综合服务中心, 云南曲靖 655199

收稿日期:2020-10-14 接受日期:2020-12-25 出版日期:2021-07-15 发布日期:2021-07-15
通讯作者: 王丽萍 E-mail: wlp736@163.com
作者简介:于海天 E-mail: haitianlegume@outlook.com
基金资助:
国家食用豆产业技术体系建设项目（CARS-08-G07）；

948项目（2014-Z51）

Genetic Diversity Analysis of Indian Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) Resources and Screening of Excellent Germplasm

YU Haitian1*, LYU Meiyuan1, WAN Shuwei2, YANG Feng1, HU Chaoqin1, YANG Xin1, ZHANG Xiaoyan2, WANG Yubao1, HE Chunhua3, LIN Deming3, WANG Liping1*

1.Institute of Food Crops, Yunnan Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Kunming 650205,China; 2.Qingdao Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Shandong Qingdao 266100, China; 3.Towns and Communities Integrated Service Center of Jitou Village of Malong District in Qujing, Yunan Qujing 655199, China

Received:2020-10-14 Accepted:2020-12-25 Online:2021-07-15 Published:2021-07-15

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 为了解并有效利用印度鹰嘴豆种质资源农艺性状的多样性，通过遗传多样性分析、聚类分析、主成分分析和综合D值评价等方法对181份印度鹰嘴豆资源的12个农艺性状的多样性水平进行分析，筛选可用于评价鹰嘴豆资源的农艺性状及综合表现良好的种质。结果表明：12个表型性状的变异系数范围为7.47%（播种至开花期天数）～85.26%（秕荚数），百粒重、分枝数、有效分枝数、实荚数、见花至开花期天数、产量、单株产量和秕荚数的变异系数均大30%，具有很好的改良潜力；Shannon多样性指数范围为1.750 9（单株产量）～2.053 5（单荚粒数），平均值为1.930 2，单荚粒数、株高、有效枝数和播种至见花期天数的多样性指数均大于2.000 0，12个农艺性状的遗传多样性指数均大于1.700 0，说明各性状的数量指标分布较为均匀；在欧式距离为3.41处，181份印度鹰嘴豆资源被分为9个类群，各类群资源数量不同，第Ⅰ～Ⅷ类群均具有一定的性状优势；筛选到4个可用于综合评价印度鹰嘴豆资源的主要表型性状，分别为实荚数、播种至开花期天数、株高、分枝数；利用综合D值评价筛选到31份综合表现较好的资源，为我国鹰嘴豆种质创新和新品种选育提供理论基础和优异的基础材料、亲本来源。

关键词: 印度, 鹰嘴豆, 资源, 遗传多样性

Abstract: In order to study the genetic diversity of agronomic traits of Indian chickpea resources, by diversity analysis and comprehensive evaluation, genetic diversity analysis, cluster analysis, principal component analysis and comprehensive D value, 12 agronomic traits of 181 chickpea resources were analyzed to select the major agronomic traits, which had significant effect on comprehensive evaluation and excellent resources which had comprehensive well performance. The results showed that the coefficient of variation of 12 agronomic traits were 7.47% (days from sowing to flowering period, DSFP) to 85.26% (number of pods no seeds per plant, NPNS), among which HSW (hundred seeds weight), NB (number of branches), NBP (number of branches with pods), NPSP (number of pods with seeds per plant), DFFP (days from first flower to flowering period), YPP(yield per plot), YH (yield per hectare) and NPNS were all higher than 30%, indicating that these traits had great potential for improvement. The Shannon-Wiener analysis showed that diversity index of 12 agronomic traits were 1.750 9 (YP) to 2.053 5 (number of seeds per pod, NSPP), among which the NSPP, PH (plant height), NBP and DSFF (days from sowing to first flower) were higher than 2.000 0, and all traits were higher than 1.700 0, indicating that all the index of 12 traits distributed well. Cluster analysis showed that when European distance was 3.41, 181 resources were clustered into nine groups with different number of resources.Excepting group Ⅸ, all groups had different advantages. Meanwhile, four traits including NPSP, DSFF, PH, NB had significant effects on. And 31 germplasm resources were selected with better comprehensive characteristics by D value, which provided theoretical basis and excellent resources for innovative utilization of chickpea in China.

Key words: India, chickpea, resources, genetic diversity

中图分类号:

S643

于海天, 吕梅媛, 万述伟, 杨峰, 胡朝芹, 杨新, 张晓艳, 王玉宝, 何春华, 林德明, 王丽萍. 印度鹰嘴豆资源遗传多样性分析及优异资源筛选#br#[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2021, 23(7): 54-64.

YU Haitian, LYU Meiyuan, WAN Shuwei, YANG Feng, HU Chaoqin, YANG Xin, ZHANG Xiaoyan, WANG Yubao, HE Chunhua, LIN Deming, WANG Liping. Genetic Diversity Analysis of Indian Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) Resources and Screening of Excellent Germplasm[J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2021, 23(7): 54-64.

[1]	刘声传, 许应芬, 魏杰, 鄢东海, 陈智雄, 徐霖, 刘燕, 周玉锋. 基于2b-RAD技术分析白化茶树品种（系）遗传多样性[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2022, 24(8): 65-73.
[2]	伊六喜, 萨如拉, 范鑫, 赵灿, 李茹, 斯钦巴特尔. 油用亚麻主要品质和农艺性状的变异分析[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2022, 24(5): 56-67.
[3]	崔晨珂, 林涛, 安艳波, 崔鹏. 不同类型甘薯品种遗传多样性的ISSR分析[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2022, 24(5): 68-75.
[4]	唐峰华, 吴祖立, 杨嘉樑, 黄洪亮, 蒋科技, ESTEFANIAGonzalez Maiez Violeta, ARREOLAJuan Pedro Vela. 加利福尼亚湾茎柔鱼（Dosidicus gigas）渔场声学调查方法[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2022, 24(4): 185-192.
[5]	左茜茜, 宋英杰, 马心妍, 杨云卉, 王轶菲, 郭泽光, 朱雄智, 刘越. 苦荞全基因组SSR位点挖掘及遗传多样性分析[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2022, 24(4): 38-51.
[6]	刘春燕, 周建伟, 马小飞, 谢忠奎, 杨果. 中国西北干旱区灌木植物饲用化利用研究进展[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2022, 24(3): 28-39.
[7]	邹婉侬,宋敏*. 试论我国公共资源治理的制度供给改革——以农业生物遗传资源治理为例[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2021, 23(4): 11-19.
[8]	周治. 我国农业秸秆高值化利用现状与困境分析[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2021, 23(2): 9-16.
[9]	王平. 我国种业发展的主要问题及对策探析[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2021, 23(11): 7-16.
[10]	李丹阳, 孙玲伟, 吴彩凤, 张树山, 张德福, 戴建军. 长江三角洲白山羊保种群体的SSR遗传多样性分析[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2021, 23(10): 74-81.
[11]	刘子乐1,白林1*,胡红文2. 超高温堆肥及其资源化与无害化研究进展[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2021, 23(1): 119-127.
[12]	相吉山1,张恒儒2,刘涵1,索良喜2,贾姝婧1,张颖1,史景奇1,胡利喆1,蔡一宁1. 不同生态区谷子种质资源表型比较分析[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2020, 22(9): 31-41.
[13]	石玉涛1,郑淑琳1,王飞权1,陈荣冰1,李远华1,张渤1,王涵2,林立2. 武夷名丛茶树种质资源矿质元素含量特征分析[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2020, 22(7): 37-50.
[14]	徐博1,2，张衡1,2,3,4，张瑛瑛1,2，冯春雷1,2. 《南印度洋渔业协定》管理措施的新进展及我国的应对策略[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2020, 22(4): 10-23.
[15]	徐娜1,张军2*,张仁陟2. 基于Malmquist DEA的甘肃内陆河流域农业水土资源利用效率及匹配特征研究[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2020, 22(2): 115-122.

印度鹰嘴豆资源遗传多样性分析及优异资源筛选#br#

Genetic Diversity Analysis of Indian Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) Resources and Screening of Excellent Germplasm

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics