中国农业科技导报 ›› 2024, Vol. 26 ›› Issue (6): 206-213.DOI: 10.13304/j.nykjdb.2023.0061
• 生物制造 资源生态 • 上一篇
黄跃1(), 谢晏芬2(
), 朱宣全1, 贾孟1, 王戈1, 白羽祥1, 杜宇1, 周鹏1, 赵宇婷2, 朱红琼2, 杨帆2, 肖志文3, 王文波2, 方志鹏2, 韩家宝2(
), 王娜1(
)
收稿日期:
2023-02-02
接受日期:
2023-07-26
出版日期:
2024-06-15
发布日期:
2024-06-12
通讯作者:
韩家宝,王娜
作者简介:
黄跃 E-mail:2662942405@qq.com基金资助:
Yue HUANG1(), Yanfen XIE2(
), Xuanquan ZHU1, Meng JIA1, Ge WANG1, Yuxiang BAI1, Yu DU1, Peng ZHOU1, Yuting ZHAO2, Hongqiong ZHU2, Fan YANG2, Zhiwen XIAO3, Wenbo WANG2, Zhipeng FANG2, Jiabao HAN2(
), Na WANG1(
)
Received:
2023-02-02
Accepted:
2023-07-26
Online:
2024-06-15
Published:
2024-06-12
Contact:
Jiabao HAN,Na WANG
摘要:
为进一步明确植烟区影响烟叶氯含量的环境因素及其可能的影响路径,于2021年在云南采集7个乡镇植烟区的烟叶及对应的土壤和灌溉水样品,系统评估该植烟区烟叶的氯含量状况,并探讨其与植烟土壤和灌溉水之间可能存在的联系。结果表明,该植烟区烟叶、灌溉水和土壤均存在不同程度氯含量超标风险,其中28.79%的烟叶中氯含量超过优质烟叶标准。Mantel-Test分析表明,烟叶氯含量与烟叶品质整体呈负相关,且与土壤主要理化性质、灌溉水氯含量密切相关。结构方程模型(structural equation model,SEM)分析表明,灌溉水氯含量对烟叶氯含量具有极显著直接正向效应(影响系数为0.459),对土壤化学特性有显著直接负向效应(影响系数为-0.225);而土壤物理特性对化学特性具有极显著正向效应(影响系数为0.370)。综上所述,该植烟区存在较高氯含量超标风险,灌溉水氯含量和土壤物理性状是重要影响因素,它们通过影响土壤化学性状及土壤含氯量共同引起烟叶氯含量超标,并最终降低烟叶品质。
中图分类号:
黄跃, 谢晏芬, 朱宣全, 贾孟, 王戈, 白羽祥, 杜宇, 周鹏, 赵宇婷, 朱红琼, 杨帆, 肖志文, 王文波, 方志鹏, 韩家宝, 王娜. 植烟区烟叶氯含量风险评估及影响因素分析[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2024, 26(6): 206-213.
Yue HUANG, Yanfen XIE, Xuanquan ZHU, Meng JIA, Ge WANG, Yuxiang BAI, Yu DU, Peng ZHOU, Yuting ZHAO, Hongqiong ZHU, Fan YANG, Zhiwen XIAO, Wenbo WANG, Zhipeng FANG, Jiabao HAN, Na WANG. Risk Assessment and Influencing Factors Analysis of Chlorine Content in Tobacco Leaves in Tobacco Planting Areas[J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2024, 26(6): 206-213.
变幅Range/% | 平均值Mean/% | 标准差 SD | 变异系数CV | 分布频率 Distribution frequency/% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
>0.8 | <0.3 | ||||
0.05~2.64 | 0.64 | 0.62 | 0.96 | 28.79 | 37.88 |
表1 植烟区中部烟叶氯含量
Table 1 Chlorine content of middle tobacco leaves in tobacco planting area
变幅Range/% | 平均值Mean/% | 标准差 SD | 变异系数CV | 分布频率 Distribution frequency/% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
>0.8 | <0.3 | ||||
0.05~2.64 | 0.64 | 0.62 | 0.96 | 28.79 | 37.88 |
指标 Index | 总糖含量Total sugar content/% | 还原糖含量Sugar content/% | 总氮含量Total nitrogen content/% | 烟碱含量Nicotine content/% | 钾含量 K content/% | 淀粉含量Starch content/% | 糖碱比 Sugar/nicotine | 氮碱比Total nitrogen/nicotine | 钾氯比 K/Cl |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
平均值Mean | 34.13 | 22.97 | 1.93 | 1.83 | 2.31 | 4.50 | 14.77 | 1.15 | 9.13 |
标准差SD | 7.08 | 5.63 | 0.34 | 0.63 | 0.67 | 0.58 | 8.15 | 0.35 | 9.60 |
变异系数CV | 0.21 | 0.25 | 0.18 | 0.34 | 0.29 | 0.13 | 0.55 | 0.30 | 1.05 |
变幅Range | 12.00~47.40 | 9.62~36.31 | 1.08~2.94 | 0.80~3.29 | 1.00~4.25 | 3.63~6.92 | 4.67~44.42 | 0.63~2.41 | 0.58~38.80 |
表2 植烟区C3F烟叶化学含量
Table 2 Chemical content of C3F tobacco leaves in tobacco planting area
指标 Index | 总糖含量Total sugar content/% | 还原糖含量Sugar content/% | 总氮含量Total nitrogen content/% | 烟碱含量Nicotine content/% | 钾含量 K content/% | 淀粉含量Starch content/% | 糖碱比 Sugar/nicotine | 氮碱比Total nitrogen/nicotine | 钾氯比 K/Cl |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
平均值Mean | 34.13 | 22.97 | 1.93 | 1.83 | 2.31 | 4.50 | 14.77 | 1.15 | 9.13 |
标准差SD | 7.08 | 5.63 | 0.34 | 0.63 | 0.67 | 0.58 | 8.15 | 0.35 | 9.60 |
变异系数CV | 0.21 | 0.25 | 0.18 | 0.34 | 0.29 | 0.13 | 0.55 | 0.30 | 1.05 |
变幅Range | 12.00~47.40 | 9.62~36.31 | 1.08~2.94 | 0.80~3.29 | 1.00~4.25 | 3.63~6.92 | 4.67~44.42 | 0.63~2.41 | 0.58~38.80 |
指标 Index | 还原糖 Sugar | 总氮 Total nitrogen | 烟碱 Nicotine | 钾 K | 淀粉 Starch | 糖碱比 Sugar/nicotine | 氮碱比 Total nitrogen/nicotine | 钾氯比 K/Cl | 综合评分Comprehensive score |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
平均值 Mean | 78.22 | 82.41 | 60.77 | 92.29 | 87.91 | 46.47 | 72.22 | 69.35 | 68.04 |
标准差 SD | 29.82 | 16.42 | 37.08 | 8.84 | 9.93 | 69.29 | 42.87 | 32.44 | 30.24 |
变异系数CV | 0.38 | 0.20 | 0.61 | 0.10 | 0.11 | 1.49 | 0.59 | 0.47 | 0.44 |
变幅 Range | -23.10~100.00 | 40.50~100.00 | -20.00~100.00 | 60.00~100.00 | 41.60~98.70 | -234.20~100.00 | -142.00~100.00 | 8.70~100.00 | -41.47~98.89 |
表3 C3F烟叶化学品质的综合评分
Table 3 Comprehensive score of chemicals in C3F tobacco
指标 Index | 还原糖 Sugar | 总氮 Total nitrogen | 烟碱 Nicotine | 钾 K | 淀粉 Starch | 糖碱比 Sugar/nicotine | 氮碱比 Total nitrogen/nicotine | 钾氯比 K/Cl | 综合评分Comprehensive score |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
平均值 Mean | 78.22 | 82.41 | 60.77 | 92.29 | 87.91 | 46.47 | 72.22 | 69.35 | 68.04 |
标准差 SD | 29.82 | 16.42 | 37.08 | 8.84 | 9.93 | 69.29 | 42.87 | 32.44 | 30.24 |
变异系数CV | 0.38 | 0.20 | 0.61 | 0.10 | 0.11 | 1.49 | 0.59 | 0.47 | 0.44 |
变幅 Range | -23.10~100.00 | 40.50~100.00 | -20.00~100.00 | 60.00~100.00 | 41.60~98.70 | -234.20~100.00 | -142.00~100.00 | 8.70~100.00 | -41.47~98.89 |
指标Index | pH | 有机质 Organic matter/ (mg·kg-1) | 水解氮 Hydrolyzed nitrogen/ (mg·kg-1) | 有效磷Available phosphorus/(mg·kg-1) | 速效钾 Available potassium/ (mg·kg-1) | 全氮Total nitrogen/% | 全磷Total phosphorus/% | 全钾Total potassium/% | 氯离子 Cl-/(mg·kg-1) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
平均值 Mean | 5.76 | 24.16 | 117.49 | 84.01 | 343.94 | 0.13 | 0.10 | 1.49 | 51.26 |
标准差 SD | 1.06 | 8.30 | 55.81 | 78.76 | 296.97 | 0.04 | 0.03 | 0.65 | 111.87 |
变异系数CV | 0.18 | 0.34 | 0.48 | 0.94 | 0.86 | 0.31 | 0.36 | 0.44 | 2.18 |
变幅 Range | 4.32~8.05 | 5.06~46.60 | 21.70~339.40 | 3.40~383.80 | 82.7~1 856.00 | 0.05~0.28 | 0.04~0.19 | 0.48~3.88 | 0.00~612.80 |
表4 植烟区土壤化学特性
Table 4 Soil chemical properties in tobacco planting area
指标Index | pH | 有机质 Organic matter/ (mg·kg-1) | 水解氮 Hydrolyzed nitrogen/ (mg·kg-1) | 有效磷Available phosphorus/(mg·kg-1) | 速效钾 Available potassium/ (mg·kg-1) | 全氮Total nitrogen/% | 全磷Total phosphorus/% | 全钾Total potassium/% | 氯离子 Cl-/(mg·kg-1) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
平均值 Mean | 5.76 | 24.16 | 117.49 | 84.01 | 343.94 | 0.13 | 0.10 | 1.49 | 51.26 |
标准差 SD | 1.06 | 8.30 | 55.81 | 78.76 | 296.97 | 0.04 | 0.03 | 0.65 | 111.87 |
变异系数CV | 0.18 | 0.34 | 0.48 | 0.94 | 0.86 | 0.31 | 0.36 | 0.44 | 2.18 |
变幅 Range | 4.32~8.05 | 5.06~46.60 | 21.70~339.40 | 3.40~383.80 | 82.7~1 856.00 | 0.05~0.28 | 0.04~0.19 | 0.48~3.88 | 0.00~612.80 |
指标Index | 团粒结构占比 Proportion of granular structure/% | 机械组成 Mechanical composition/% | 容重Bulk density/(g·cm-3) | 总孔隙度Total porosity/% | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
>5.01 mm | 3.01~5.00 mm | 2.01~3.00 mm | 1.01~2.00 mm | 0.51~1.00 mm | 0.25~0.50 mm | 砂粒 Grit | 粉沙粒Powder sand | 黏粒Cosmid | |||
平均值Mean | 4.86 | 3.52 | 4.18 | 3.37 | 14.50 | 5.56 | 40.54 | 24.79 | 34.68 | 1.17 | 55.70 |
标准差 SD | 5.95 | 3.18 | 2.94 | 2.07 | 8.89 | 2.34 | 16.75 | 9.64 | 13.15 | 0.20 | 7.68 |
变异系数CV | 1.22 | 0.90 | 0.70 | 0.61 | 0.61 | 0.42 | 0.41 | 0.39 | 0.38 | 0.17 | 0.14 |
变幅 Range | 0.00~26.41 | 0.23~15.89 | 0.11~16.36 | 0.42~9.57 | 0.56~36.67 | 2.07~14.83 | 6.74~81.97 | 5.25~43.15 | 0.91~76.69 | 0.84~1.70 | 33.87~66.42 |
表5 植烟区土壤物理特性
Table 5 Soil physical properties in tobacco planting area
指标Index | 团粒结构占比 Proportion of granular structure/% | 机械组成 Mechanical composition/% | 容重Bulk density/(g·cm-3) | 总孔隙度Total porosity/% | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
>5.01 mm | 3.01~5.00 mm | 2.01~3.00 mm | 1.01~2.00 mm | 0.51~1.00 mm | 0.25~0.50 mm | 砂粒 Grit | 粉沙粒Powder sand | 黏粒Cosmid | |||
平均值Mean | 4.86 | 3.52 | 4.18 | 3.37 | 14.50 | 5.56 | 40.54 | 24.79 | 34.68 | 1.17 | 55.70 |
标准差 SD | 5.95 | 3.18 | 2.94 | 2.07 | 8.89 | 2.34 | 16.75 | 9.64 | 13.15 | 0.20 | 7.68 |
变异系数CV | 1.22 | 0.90 | 0.70 | 0.61 | 0.61 | 0.42 | 0.41 | 0.39 | 0.38 | 0.17 | 0.14 |
变幅 Range | 0.00~26.41 | 0.23~15.89 | 0.11~16.36 | 0.42~9.57 | 0.56~36.67 | 2.07~14.83 | 6.74~81.97 | 5.25~43.15 | 0.91~76.69 | 0.84~1.70 | 33.87~66.42 |
平均值 Mean /(mg·L-1) | 标准差 SD | 变异系数 CV/% | 变幅 Range/(mg·L-1) | 分布频率 Distribution frequency/% |
---|---|---|---|---|
>16.00 | ||||
9.65 | 9.28 | 0.96 | 0.52~40.50 | 18.19 |
表6 灌溉水氯含量
Table 6 Chlorine content of irrigation water
平均值 Mean /(mg·L-1) | 标准差 SD | 变异系数 CV/% | 变幅 Range/(mg·L-1) | 分布频率 Distribution frequency/% |
---|---|---|---|---|
>16.00 | ||||
9.65 | 9.28 | 0.96 | 0.52~40.50 | 18.19 |
图1 烟叶氯含量与环境因子的Mantel-Test分析注:热图中每个方格内色块颜色表示环境因子间相关性系数正负,色块大小表示相关系数绝对值大小。线条粗细表示相关性强弱,线条颜色表示显著性程度。SOM—土壤有机质;AN—水解氮;AP—有效磷;AK—有效钾;TN—全氮;TP—全磷;TK—全钾;Cl-S—土壤Cl-含量;Cl-W—水Cl-含量;Cl-T—烟叶Cl-含量;Gr—砂粒;PD—粉沙粒;CM—黏粒;BD—容量;TP—总空隙度;CS—综合评分;S1~S6分别表示>5.01、3.01~5.00、2.01~3.00、1.01~2.00、0.51~1.00、0.25~0.50 mm的土壤团粒结构。
Fig. 1 Mantel-Test analysis between chlorine content in tobacco leaves with environmental factorsNote: The color of the color block in each square in the heat map indicates the positive or negative correlation coefficient between the environmental factors, and the size of the color block indicates the absolute value of the correlation coefficient. The thickness of the line indicates the strength of the correlation, and the color of the line indicates the degree of significance. SOM—Soil organic matter; AN—Hydrolyzed nitrogen; AP—Available phosphorus; AK—Available potassium; TN—Total nitrogen; TP—Total phosphorus; TK—Total potassium; Cl-S—Cl- content in soil; Cl-W—Cl- content in water; Cl-T—Cl- content in leaf of tobacco; Gr—Grit; PD—Powder sand; CM—Cosmid; BD—Bulk density; TP—Total porosity; CS—Comprehensive score;S1~S6 represent the soil aggregate structure of >5.01, 3.01~5.00, 2.01~3.00, 1.01~2.00, 0.51~1.00, 0.25~0.50 mm, respectively.
图2 烟叶氯含量与土壤理化、灌溉水氯含量及烟叶综合评分的相互关系注:虚线表示负向影响;实线表示正向影响。*、**和***分别表示在P<0.05、P<0.01和P<0.001水平显著相关。
Fig. 2 Correlation between chlorine content in tobacco leaf, soil physicochemical content, chlorine content in irrigation water and comprehensive score of tobacco leafNote: The dotted line indicates negative impact; the solid line indicates positive impact.*, ** and *** indicate significant correlation at P<0.05, P<0.01 and P<0.001 levels, respectively.
1 | 张清壮,屠乃美,付小红,等.氯对烤烟的影响及植烟土壤氯现状[J].作物研究,2015(2):215-220. |
ZHANG Q Z, TU N M, FU X H, et al.. Effect of chlorine on flue-cured tobacco and current situationof chlorine in tobacco-planting soil [J]. Crop Res., 2015(2):215-220. | |
2 | 刘鹏,朱金峰,郭利,等.烤烟氯离子来源及控制措施研究进展[J].江西农业学报,2013,25(3):74-77, 82. |
LIU P, ZHU J F, GUO L, et al.. Research progress in source and control measures of chlorine lon in flue-cured tobacco [J]. Acta Agric. Jiangxi, 2013,25(3):74-77, 82 . | |
3 | 赵龙杰,岑小红,吴小平,等.氯素对烤烟生长发育和经济性状影响的研究进展[J].安徽农学通报,2012,18(19):69-72. |
ZHAO L J, CEN X H, WU X P, et al.. Research progress on the effect of chloride on growth and development and economic quality of flue-cured tobacco [J]. Anhui Agric. Sci. Bull., 2012, 18(19):69-72. | |
4 | 江苏农学院.植物生理学[M].北京:农业出版社,1988:115-142. |
5 | 何永良.贵州烤烟施氯量的初步研究[J].中国烟草,1987(4):24-29. |
6 | 徐安传,李佛琳,王超.氯素对烤烟生长发育和品质的影响研究进展[J].中国烟草科学,2007(2):6-9. |
XU A C, LI F L, WANG C. Advance in effect of chloride on flue-cured tobacco growth and development and leaf quality [J]. Chin. Tob. Sci., 2007(2):6-9. | |
7 | 田飞,罗建新,刘建国,等.氯肥对烟田土壤和烟叶氯含量及产量的影响[J].湖南农业大学学报(自然科学版),2019,45(3):264-268. |
TIAN F, LUO J X, LIU J G, et al.. Effect of chlorine fertilizer on chlorine contents in tobacco leaves and tobacco field soil and tobacco vield [J]. J. Hunan Agric.Univ., 2019, 45(3):264-268. | |
8 | 田婕,曹娜.贫氯土壤增施氯肥对烤烟产质量的影响[J].湖南农业科学,2010(9):58-59, 62. |
TIAN J, CAO N. Effects of chlorine fertilizer on yield and quality of flue-cured tobacco [J]. Hunan Agric. Sci., 2010(9):58-59, 62. | |
9 | 张翔,范艺宽,黄元炯,等.烤烟吸收氯的主要来源及其在体内分布的研究[J].土壤肥料,2006(2):62-64. |
ZHANG X, FAN Y K, HUANG Y J, et al.. The study of chloride’s main origin and accumulation in flue-cured tobacco [J]. Soil Fert. Sci., 2006(2):62-64. | |
10 | 王东旭,贾志红,周文辉,等.氯离子在不同质地植烟土壤中的迁移及烟株中的积累[J].中国烟草学报,2022,28(1):68-77. |
WANG D X, JIA Z H, ZHOU W H, et al.. Migration of chloride ion in tobacco-planting soil with different textures it accumulation in tobacco plants [J]. Acta Tab. Sin., 2022, 28(1):68-77. | |
11 | 饶巍,李春萍,文晓阳,等.不同基因型烟草对氯离子吸收、积累与分配的差异性分析[J].河南农业科学,2022,51(11):56-64. |
RAO W, LI C P, WEN X Y, et al.. Differential analysis of chlorion absorption, accumulation and distribution in different genotypes of tobacco [J]. J. Henan Agric. Sci., 2022, 51(11):56-64. | |
12 | 张龙,张忠启,何轶,等.毕节烟区土壤氯离子含量状况与烟叶氯素风险评价[J].土壤通报,2022,53(1):97-105. |
ZHANG L, ZHANG Z Q, HE Y, et al.. Status of chloride ion content in tobacco growing soil and risk assessment of tobacco quality in Bijie [J]. Chin. J. Soil Sci., 2022, 53(1):97-105. | |
13 | 张阳,屠乃美,陈舜尧,等.气候因子对湘东茶陵烟区烤烟氯、钾含量的影响[J].中国烟草科学,2020,41(5):60-67. |
ZHANG Y, TU N M, CHEN S Y, et al.. Effects of climate factors on chlorine and potassium contents of flue-cured tobacco in eastern Hunan [J]. Chin. Tob. Sci., 2020, 41(5):60-67. | |
14 | 李文卿,陈顺辉,林海滨,等.氯肥施用时期对烤烟生长期间氯积累规律的影响[J].中国农学通报,2009,25(17):149-152. |
LI W Q, CHEN S H, LIN H B, et al.. Effects of chlorine applying time on disciplinarian of chlorine accumulation as flue-cured tobacco plant growth [J]. Chin. Agric. Sci. Bull., 2009, 25(17):149-152. | |
15 | 卢晓华,熊德忠,杨美丽.氯素营养水平对烤烟生长发育及产质量的影响[J].中国烟草科学,2012,33(1):52-55, 59,62. |
LU X H, XIONG D Z, YANG M L. Effect of chlorine nutrient levels on growth,yield and quality of flue-cured tobacco [J]. Chin. Tob. Sci., 2012, 33(1):52-55, 59,62. | |
16 | 许永锋,陈顺辉,李文卿,等.不同施氯量对烤烟氯含量和产质量的影响[J].中国烟草科学,2008(5):27-31. |
XU Y F, CHEN S H, LI W Q, et al.. Effects of chlorine rates on chlorine content, yield, and quality of flue cured tobacco [J]. Chin. Tob. Sci., 2008(5):27-31. | |
17 | 程智敏,杨懿德,蔡毅,等.紫色土不同氯化钾施用量和栽培模式对烤烟氯含量及产量与质量的影响[J].现代农业科技,2020(13):11-14. |
CHENG Z M, YANG Y D, CAI Y, et al.. Effects of different potassium chloride application amount and cultivation patterns on chlorine content,yield and quality of flue-cured tobacco in purple soil [J]. Mod. Agric. Sci. Technol., 2020(13):11-14. | |
18 | 蔡雅楠,詹芷叶,陈前火,等.福建某滨海湖泊周边土壤氯含量空间分布研究[J].福建轻纺,2020, 370(3):45-50. |
19 | 武小净,李德成,胡锋,等.我国主要烟区灌溉水氯含量状况评价[J].土壤,2013,45(4):759-762. |
WU X J, LI D C, HU F, et al.. Assessment on chlorine contents in irrigation water of tobacco-planting areas in China [J]. Soils, 2013, 45(4):759-762. | |
20 | 王颖,张威,王洪波,等. 烟草及烟草制品氯的测定连续流动法: [S].北京:中国标准出版社,2011. |
21 | 王敏,南春波,王占华,等. 土壤pH的测定: [S].北京:中国标准出版社,2007. |
22 | 任意,辛景树,田有国,等. 土壤检测.第6部分:土壤有机质的测定: [S].北京:中国标准出版社,2006. |
23 | 焦如珍,董玉红,孙启武. 森林土壤氮的测定: [S].北京:中国标准出版社,2015. |
24 | 辛景树,郑磊,钟航,等. 土壤检测.第7部分:土壤有效磷的测定: [S].北京:中国标准出版社,2014. |
25 | 杜森,高祥照,陆若辉,等. 土壤速效钾和缓效钾含量的测定: [S].北京:中国标准出版社,2004. |
26 | 周斐德,邵则瑶. 土壤全氮测定法半微量开氏法: [S].北京:中国标准出版社,1987. |
27 | 肖国壮,张辉,苏方康,等. 土壤全磷测定法: [S].北京:中国标准出版社,1988. |
28 | 傅绍清,王永真,张汝英,等. 土壤全钾测定法: [S].北京:中国标准出版社,1988. |
29 | 王敏,金轲,陈芳,等. 土壤氯离子含量的测定: [S].北京:中国标准出版社,2007. |
30 | 田有国,辛景树,任意,等. 土壤检测.第4部分:土壤容重的测定: [S].北京:中国标准出版社,2006. |
31 | 杜森, 高祥照.土壤分析技术规范[M].北京:中国农业出版社,2006:1-256. |
32 | 田有国,辛景树,任意,等. 土壤检测.第3部分:土壤机械组成的测定: [S].北京:中国标准出版社,2006. |
33 | 辛景树, 许宗林,于立宏,等. 土壤检测.第19部分:土壤水稳性大团聚体组成的测定: [S].北京:中国标准出版社,2008. |
34 | 王颖,张威,王洪波,等. 烟草及烟草制品 氯的测定:连续流动法: [S].北京:中国标准出版社,2011. |
35 | 刘惠民,李萍,李荣,等. 烟草及烟草制品 水溶性糖的测定:连续流动法: [S].北京:中国标准出版社,2002. |
36 | 刘惠民,李荣,李萍,等. 烟草及烟草制品 总植物碱的测定:连续流动法: [S].北京:中国标准出版社,2002. |
37 | 刘惠民,王芳,李荣,等. 烟草及烟草制品 总氮的测定:连续流动法: [S].北京:中国标准出版社,2002. |
38 | 张威,王芳,王颖,等. 烟草及烟制品 钾的测定:连续流动法: [S]. 北京:中国标准出版社,2011. |
39 | 张威,王颖,李超,等. 烟草及烟草制品 淀粉的测定:连续流动法: [S]. 北京:中国标准出版社,2011. |
40 | 王彦亭,谢剑平,李志宏.中国烟草种植区划[M].北京:科学出版社,2010:32-37. |
41 | 谢晋,严玛丽,陈建军,等.不同铵态氮硝态氮配比对烤烟产量、质量及其主要化学成分的影响[J].植物营养与肥料学报,2014,20(4):1030-1037. |
XIE J, YAN M L, CHEN J J, et al.. Effect of nitrogen forms on yield, quality and main chemical components of flue-cured tobacco [J]. Plant Nutr. Fert. Sci., 2014, 20(4):1030-1037. | |
42 | 罗登山,王兵,马宇平,等. 烤烟烟叶质量风格特色感官评价方法: [S].北京:中国标准出版社.2015. |
43 | CSARDI G, NEPUSZ T. The igraph software package for complex network research [J]. Int. J. Complex Syst. 2006, 95(6):1-9. |
44 | GIORGIO R. Non-metric partial least squares [J]. Electron. J. Statist., 201, 6:1641-1669. |
45 | 李强,周冀衡,何伟,等.中国主要烟区烤烟氯含量区域特征研究[J].中国土壤与肥料,2010(2):49-54. |
LI Q, ZHOU J H, HE W, et al.. Study of regional characteristic of chlorine content of flue-cured tobacco in main tobacco area of China [J]. Soil Fert. Sci. China., 2010(2):49-54. | |
46 | 郭芳阳,刘巧真,阎小毛,等.灌溉水氯含量与灌溉次数对烤烟叶片氯含量的影响[J].中国农学通报,2019,35(32):31-35. |
GUO F Y, LIU Q Z, YAN X M, et al.. Effect of irrigation water chlorine content and irrigation times on chlorine content of flue-cured tobacco leaves [J]. Chin. Agric. Sci. Bull., 2019, 35(32):31-35. | |
47 | 张晓,刘丽竹,张玉璞,等.吉林省主要烟区灌溉水中氯含量的评价[J].农业开发与装备,2018, 193(1):116,111. |
48 | 王齐,刘英杰,周德全,等.短期和长期中水灌溉对绿地土壤理化性质的影响[J].水土保持学报,2011,25(5):74-80. |
WANG Q, LIU Y J, ZHOU D Q, et al.. Effect on greenland soil physical and chemical properties irrigated by reclaimed water for short-term and long-term [J]. J. Soil Water Conserv., 2011, 25(5):74-80. | |
49 | 王瑞新.烟草化学[M].北京:中国农业出版社,2003:256-258. |
50 | 杜芳芳,童根平,郭瑞,等.浙江亚热带自然保护区土壤养分空间异质性及其影响因素[J].浙江农林大学学报,2023,40(1):145-154. |
WANG F F, TONG G P, GUO R, et al.. Spatial heterogeneity of soil nutrients and the influencing factors in Zhejiang subtropical nature reserve [J]. J. Zhejiang A&F Univ., 2023, 40(1):145-154. | |
51 | 王学寅,黄益灵,全斌斌,等.浙江省瑞安市耕作层土壤养分元素有效态含量空间变异特征及其影响因素[J].现代地质,2022,36(3):963-971. |
WANG X Y, HUANG Y L, QUAN B B, et al.. Spatial variability characteristics and influencing factors of available contents of nutritive elements in tillage layer soil of Rui’an, Zhejiang province [J]. Geoscience, 2022, 36(3):963-971. |
[1] | 张明艳1,张继光1*,申国明1,张忠锋1,蔡宪杰2,薛林3. 烟田土壤微生物群落结构及功能微生物的研究现状与展望[J]. , 2014, 16(5): 115-122. |
[2] | 段玉琪1*,金磊1,2*,杨宇虹1,黄成江3,晋艳1,周冀衡4. 短日照对烤烟花芽分化及生物学性状的影响[J]. , 2011, 13(3): 108-112. |
阅读次数 | ||||||
全文 |
|
|||||
摘要 |
|
|||||