中国农业科技导报 ›› 2023, Vol. 25 ›› Issue (5): 55-65.DOI: 10.13304/j.nykjdb.2021.1013
李欣燕1(), 张明月1, 王方玲1,2, 姜慧娟3, 王俊4, 钟秋4(
), 赵铭钦1(
)
收稿日期:
2021-11-29
接受日期:
2022-01-21
出版日期:
2023-05-20
发布日期:
2023-07-13
通讯作者:
钟秋,赵铭钦
作者简介:
李欣燕 E-mail:lixinyan1618@163.com
基金资助:
Xinyan LI1(), Mingyue ZHANG1, Fangling WANG1,2, Huijuan JIANG3, Jun WANG4, Qiu ZHONG4(
), Mingqin ZHAO1(
)
Received:
2021-11-29
Accepted:
2022-01-21
Online:
2023-05-20
Published:
2023-07-13
Contact:
Qiu ZHONG,Mingqin ZHAO
摘要:
为研究不同保水剂对干旱胁迫下雪茄烟叶矿质元素含量的影响,以‘德雪3号’雪茄烟为试材,采用盆栽试验研究了保水剂种类(SAP保水剂、沃特保水剂和自制保水剂)与用量(2、4 和6 g·株-1)对雪茄烟生长过程中矿质元素含量消长规律的影响。结果表明,干旱胁迫下施用3 种保水剂均能显著增加烟叶生长发育前期N、P、K含量,减缓后期N、P积累,有助于C/N代谢及时转化与烟叶适时落黄,且在各时期烟叶中K含量均高于对照;抑制烟叶中Ca含量,防止烟叶过厚粗糙从而影响烟叶品质;增进烟叶中Fe、Mn、B、Zn、Cu等微量元素含量。对烟叶中矿质元素含量进行相关分析,结果表明,N、K、Ca、Mg之间存在协同增效作用;而B与N、K、Ca、Mg之间及Cu、Mn与Ca、Mg间均存在一定的拮抗效应。自制保水剂和SAP保水剂的施用量为4 g·株-1、沃特保水剂的施用量为6 g·株-1时对协调雪茄烟叶大、中、微量元素之间的平衡效果最佳。
中图分类号:
李欣燕, 张明月, 王方玲, 姜慧娟, 王俊, 钟秋, 赵铭钦. 不同保水剂对雪茄烟叶生长发育过程中矿质元素动态变化的影响[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2023, 25(5): 55-65.
Xinyan LI, Mingyue ZHANG, Fangling WANG, Huijuan JIANG, Jun WANG, Qiu ZHONG, Mingqin ZHAO. Effect of Different Water Retention Agents on Mineral Elements Dynamic Changes During the Growth and Development of Cigar Leaves[J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2023, 25(5): 55-65.
处理 Treatment | 种类 Type | 用量/(g·株-1) Dosage/(g·plant-1) |
---|---|---|
CK | - | - |
T1 | TS-PAA | 2 |
T2 | TS-PAA | 4 |
T3 | TS-PAA | 6 |
T4 | SAP | 2 |
T5 | SAP | 4 |
T6 | SAP | 6 |
T7 | 沃特Walter | 2 |
T8 | 沃特Walter | 4 |
T9 | 沃特Walter | 6 |
表1 不同保水剂种类与用量试验设计
Table 1 Experimental design and treatment of different water retaining agent dosages
处理 Treatment | 种类 Type | 用量/(g·株-1) Dosage/(g·plant-1) |
---|---|---|
CK | - | - |
T1 | TS-PAA | 2 |
T2 | TS-PAA | 4 |
T3 | TS-PAA | 6 |
T4 | SAP | 2 |
T5 | SAP | 4 |
T6 | SAP | 6 |
T7 | 沃特Walter | 2 |
T8 | 沃特Walter | 4 |
T9 | 沃特Walter | 6 |
图1 不同处理下雪茄烟中部叶片的总N含量注:不同英文小写字母表示同一时期不同处理间在P<0.05水平差异显著。
Fig. 1 N contents in the middle leaf of cigar under different treatmentsNote: Different lowercase letters indicate significant differences between different treatments of same stage at P<0.05 level.
图2 不同处理下雪茄烟中部叶的P含量注:不同英文小写字母表示同一时期不同处理间在P<0.05水平差异显著。
Fig. 2 P contents in the middle leaf of cigar under different treatmentsNote: Different lowercase letters indicate significant differences between different treatments of same stage at P<0.05 level.
图3 不同处理下雪茄烟中部叶的K含量注:不同英文小写字母表示同一时期不同处理间在P<0.05水平差异显著。
Fig. 3 K contents in middle leaves of cigar under different treatmentsNote: Different lowercase letters indicate significant differences between different treatments of same stage at P<0.05 level.
图4 不同处理下雪茄烟中部叶的Ca含量注:不同英文小写字母表示同一时期不同处理间在P<0.05水平差异显著。
Fig. 4 Ca contents in middle leaves of cigar under different treatmentsNote: Different lowercase letters indicate significant differences between different treatments of same stage at P<0.05 level.
图5 不同处理下雪茄烟中部叶的Mg含量注:不同英文小写字母表示同一时期不同处理间在P<0.05水平差异显著。
Fig. 5 Mg contents in middle leaves of cigar under different treatmentsNote: Different lowercase letters indicate significant differences between different treatments of same stage at P<0.05 level.
图6 不同处理下雪茄烟中部叶的Fe含量注:不同英文小写字母表示同一时期不同处理间在P<0.05水平差异显著。
Fig. 6 Fe contents in middle leaves of cigar under different treatmentsNote: Different lowercase letters indicate significant differences between different treatments of same stage at P<0.05 level.
图7 不同处理下雪茄烟中部叶的Mn含量注:不同英文小写字母表示同一时期不同处理间在P<0.05水平差异显著。
Fig. 7 Mn contents in middle leaves of cigar under different treatmentsNote: Different lowercase letters indicate significant differences between different treatments of same stage at P<0.05 level.
图8 不同处理下雪茄烟中部叶的Cu含量注:不同英文小写字母表示同一时期不同处理间在P<0.05水平差异显著。
Fig. 8 Cu contents in middle leaves of cigar under different treatmentsNote: Different lowercase letters indicate significant differences between different treatments of same stage at P<0.05 level.
图9 不同处理下雪茄烟中部叶的Zn含量注:不同英文小写字母表示同一时期不同处理间在P<0.05水平差异显著。
Fig. 9 Zn contents in middle leaves of cigar under different treatmentsNote: Different lowercase letters indicate significant differences between different treatments of same stage at P<0.05 level.
图10 不同处理下雪茄烟中部叶的B含量注:不同英文小写字母表示同一时期不同处理间在P<0.05水平差异显著。
Fig. 10 B contents in middle leaves of cigar under different treatmentsNote: Different lowercase letters indicate significant differences between different treatments of same stage at P<0.05 level.
矿质元素 Mineral element | N | P | K | Ca | Mg | Fe | Mn | Cu | Zn |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
P | 0.254 | ||||||||
K | 0.773** | 0.235 | |||||||
Ca | 0.586** | -0.405** | 0.652** | ||||||
Mg | 0.728** | -0.100 | 0.776** | 0.835** | |||||
Fe | -0.032 | -0.055 | -0.183 | -0.053 | 0.027 | ||||
Mn | -0.190 | 0.662** | -0.134 | -0.615** | -0.375* | 0.178 | |||
Cu | -0.302 | 0.593** | -0.196 | -0.672** | -0.466** | -0.269 | 0.778** | ||
Zn | -0.248 | 0.006 | -0.308 | -0.267 | -0.102 | 0.319* | 0.208 | 0.105 | |
B | -0.517** | 0.199 | -0.590** | -0.641** | -0.548** | 0.277 | 0.498** | 0.307 | 0.391* |
表2 烟叶中矿质元素含量的相关分析
Table 2 Correlation analysis of mineral element contents in tobacco leaves
矿质元素 Mineral element | N | P | K | Ca | Mg | Fe | Mn | Cu | Zn |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
P | 0.254 | ||||||||
K | 0.773** | 0.235 | |||||||
Ca | 0.586** | -0.405** | 0.652** | ||||||
Mg | 0.728** | -0.100 | 0.776** | 0.835** | |||||
Fe | -0.032 | -0.055 | -0.183 | -0.053 | 0.027 | ||||
Mn | -0.190 | 0.662** | -0.134 | -0.615** | -0.375* | 0.178 | |||
Cu | -0.302 | 0.593** | -0.196 | -0.672** | -0.466** | -0.269 | 0.778** | ||
Zn | -0.248 | 0.006 | -0.308 | -0.267 | -0.102 | 0.319* | 0.208 | 0.105 | |
B | -0.517** | 0.199 | -0.590** | -0.641** | -0.548** | 0.277 | 0.498** | 0.307 | 0.391* |
1 | 刘蒙蒙,王旭锋,王慧芳,等.雪茄茄衣烟干物质及矿质营养积累规律的研究[J].山东农业科学,2015,47(8):67-70. |
LIU M M, WANG X F, WANG H F, et al.. Research on accumulation of dry matter and mineral nutrients in cigar wrapper tobacco [J]. Shandong Agric. Sci., 2015, 47(8):67-70. | |
2 | 王一恒,崔俊明,袁波,等.雪茄外包皮烟叶干物质及矿质营养元素的积累[J].浙江农业学报,2011,23(4):680-684. |
WANG Y H, CUI J M, YUAN B, et al.. Accumulation of dry matter and mineral nutrients in cigar wrapper tobaccos [J]. Acta Agric. Zhejiangensis, 2011, 23(4):680-684. | |
3 | 陈芳泉,邵惠芳,许自成,等.保水剂在烟草上的应用研究进展[J].山东农业科学,2016,48(6):156-159. |
CHEN F Q, SHAO H F, XU Z C, et al.. Progress in application research of water retaining agent on tobacco [J]. Shandong Agric. Sci., 2016, 48(6):156-159. | |
4 | 刘国顺.烟草栽培学[M].北京:中国农业出版社,2003:1-335. |
5 | 李芳然,赵亚锋,赵名彦,等.高分子保水剂在水土保持中的应用研究综述[J].甘肃农业科技,2019(5):56-60. |
LI F R, ZHAO Y F, ZHAO M Y, et al.. Application research of polymer water-retaining agent on soil and water conservation [J]. Gansu Agric. Sci. Tech., 2019(5):56-60. | |
6 | 张婧,侯党社,辛莹娟,等.天然高分子改性保水剂的研究进展[J].陕西农业科学,2020,66(10):76-80. |
ZHANG J, HOU D S, XIN Y J, et al.. Research progress of natural polymer modified water retaining agent [J]. Shaanxi J. Agric. Sci., 2020, 66(10):76-80. | |
7 | NAZARLI H, ZARDASHTI M R. The effect of drought stress and super absorbent polymer (A200) on agronomical traits of sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) under field condition [J]. Cercetari Agron. Moldova, 2010, 43:5-13. |
8 | OMIDIAN H, ROCCA J G, PARK K. Advances in superporous hydrogels [J]. J. Controlled Release Official J. Controlled Release Soc., 2005, 102(1):3-12. |
9 | 包开花,蒙美莲,陈有君,等.覆膜方式和保水剂对旱作马铃薯光合特性及产量的影响[J].干旱地区农业研究,2016,34(3):139-143, 159. |
BAO K H, MENG M L, CHEN Y J, et al.. Effects of plastic film mulching patterns and water retaining agent on photosynthetic characteristics and yield of rainfed potato [J]. Agric. Res. Arid Areas, 2016, 34(3):139-143, 159. | |
10 | 李中阳,吕谋超,樊向阳,等.不同类型保水剂对冬小麦水分利用效率和根系形态的影响[J].应用生态学报,2015,26(12):3753-3758. |
LI Z Y, LYU M C, FAN X Y, et al.. Influences of different kinds of water retentive agents on water use efficiency and root morphology of winter wheat [J]. Chin. J. Appl. Ecol., 2015, 26(12):3753-3758. | |
11 | 杨永辉,赵世伟,黄占斌,等.沃特多功能保水剂保水性能研究[J].干旱地区农业研究,2006(5):35-37. |
YANG Y H, ZHAO S W, HUANG Z B, et al.. Study on water-conserving ability of multifunctional water absorbant [J]. Agric. Res. Arid Areas, 2006(5):35-37. | |
12 | 张季平.沃特复合保水剂耐受性能测试与比较[J].内蒙古水利,2008(2):35-36. |
13 | 张季平.沃特复合保水剂对红萝卜生长的影响[J].内蒙古水利,2008(2):37,44. |
14 | 杜社妮,白岗栓,赵世伟,等.沃特和PAM保水剂对土壤水分及马铃薯生长的影响研究[J].农业工程学报,2007(8):72-79. |
DU S N, BAI G S, ZHAO S W, et al.. Effects of wote super absorbent and PAM absorbent on soil moisture and growth of potato [J]. Trans. Chin. Soc. Agric. Eng., 2007(8):72-79. | |
15 | 赵铭钦,赵进恒,韩富根,等.保水剂对烤烟质体色素及其降解产物的影响[J].土壤,2010,42(6):1020-1024. |
ZHAO M Q, ZHAO J H, HAN F G, et al.. Effect of water retention agent on chromoplast pigment and degraded products in flue-cured tobacco leaf [J]. Soils, 2010, 42(6):1020-1024. | |
16 | 黄占斌,朱书全,张铃春,等.保水剂在农业改土节水中的效应研究[J].水土保持研究,2004,11(3):57-60. |
HUANG Z B, ZHU S Q, ZHANG L C, et al.. The effect on soil improving and water saving applied with chemical absorb in agriculture [J]. Res. Soil Water Conserv., 2004,11(3):57-60. | |
17 | 黄占斌,孙朋成,钟建,等.高分子保水剂在土壤水肥保持和污染治理中的应用进展[J].农业工程学报,2016,32(1):125-131. |
HUANG Z B, SUN P C, ZHONG J, et al.. Application of super absorbent polymer in water and fertilizer conservation of soil and pollution management [J]. Trans. Chin. Soc. Agric. Eng., 2016, 32(1):125-131. | |
18 | 杨直毅,汪有科,赵颖娜,等.树枝覆盖与98i保水剂对土壤水分的影响[J].灌溉排水学报,2010,29(1):97-99. |
19 | 王宇,叶建仁.保水剂种类及含量对土壤水分蒸发的影响[J].南京林业大学学报(自然科学版),2008,32(4):95-97. |
WANG Y, YE J R. Effects of water-retaining-agents species and concentrations on water evaporation quantity of soil [J]. J. Nanjing For. Univ. (Nat. Sci.), 2008, 32(4):95-97. | |
20 | 庄文化,冯浩,吴普特.高分子保水剂农业应用研究进展[J].农业工程学报,2007,23(6):265-270. |
ZHUANG W H, FENG H, WU P T. Development of super absorbent polymer and its application in agriculture [J]. Trans. Chin. Soc. Agric. Eng., 2007, 23(6):265-270. | |
21 | 周江涛,程存刚,闫帅,等.复合覆盖对旱地苹果叶片矿质元素及果实品质的影响[J].北方园艺,2020(5):46-50. |
ZHOU J T, CHENG C G, YAN S, et al.. Effect of composite mulching patterns on mineral element contents of leaves and fruit quality of apple in dryland [J]. Northern Hortic., 2020 (5): 46-50 | |
22 | 贾明方,曹辉,杜远鹏,等.保水剂对红地球葡萄生长发育的影响[J].中外葡萄与葡萄酒,2015(1):17-20. |
JIA M F, CAO H, DU Y P, et al.. Effects of super absorbent polymers on growth and development of Red globe grapevine [J]. Chin. Foreign Grapes Wines, 2015(1):17-20. | |
23 | 吴娜,赵宝平,曾昭海,等.两种灌溉方式下保水剂用量对裸燕麦产量和品质的影响[J].作物学报,2009,35(8):1552-1557. |
WU N, ZHAO B P, ZENG Z H, et al.. Effects of super absorbent polymer application rate on yield and quality of naked oat (Avenue nuda L.) in two irrigation systems [J]. Acta Agron. Sin., 2009, 35(8):1552-1557. | |
24 | 韩富根.烟草化学[M].北京:中国农业出版社,2010:1-345. |
25 | 胡国松,郑伟,王震东,等.烤烟营养原理[M].北京:科学出版社,2000:162-167,362-367. |
26 | 王宗恒,马志远,苏兆亮,等.不同保水剂施用量对烟草生长品质的影响[J].现代农业科技,2019(20):11-12, 14. |
WANG Z H, MA Z Y, SU Z L, et al.. Effects of different super absorbent polymers residue levels on growth quality of tobacco [J]. Mod. Agric. Sci. Technol., 2019(20):11-12, 14. | |
27 | 魏云浩,李宇鹏,李进,等.保水剂的发展前景[J].现代农业研究,2019(3):52-54. |
WEI Y H, LI Y P, LI J, et al.. The development prospect of water retention agent [J]. Mod. Agric. Res., 2019(3):52-54. | |
28 | 陆荣,蔡磊,张峰.高吸水树脂的农业应用[J].山东化工,2015,44(3):95-97. |
LU R, CAI L, ZHANG F. Agriculture application of super-absorbent resin [J]. J. Shandong Chem., 2015, 44(3):95-97. | |
29 | 刘世亮,寇太记,介晓磊,等.保水剂对玉米生长和土壤养分转化供应的影响研究[J].河南农业大学学报,2005,39(2):146-150. |
LIU S L, KOU T J, JIE X L, et al.. Studies on the effects of water retaining agents on maize growth and soil nutrient transformation [J]. J. Henan Agric. Univ., 2005, 39(2):146-150. | |
30 | 任岩岩,武继承.保水剂对土壤性质及土壤微生物的影响研究进展[J].河南农业科学,2009(4):13-15. |
31 | 马焕成,罗质斌,陈义群,等.保水剂对土壤养分的保蓄作用[J].浙江林学院学报,2004,21(4):46-49. |
MA H C, LUO Z B, CHEN Y Q, et al.. Hydrogel’s role in retention of nutrients in soil [J]. J. Zhejiang For. Coll., 2004, 21(4):46-49. | |
32 | 陈芳泉,邵惠芳,崔登科,等.保水剂对烟草生理特性的影响[J].中国农业科技导报,2017,19(1):51-57. |
CHEN F Q, SHAO H F, CUI D K, et al.. Effect of water retaining agent on physiological characteristics of tobacco [J]. J. Agric. Sci. Technol., 2017, 19(1):51-57. | |
33 | 王卫峰,胡亚杰,张丰收,等.不同移栽期对烟叶主要矿质营养元素的影响[J].天津农业科学,2016,22(6):120-123. |
WANG W F, HU Y J, ZHANG F S, et al.. Effects of transplanting periods on main mineral nutrition elements of flue-cured tobacco [J]. Tianjin Agric. Sci., 2016, 22(6):120-123. | |
34 | 白岗栓,耿伟,何登峰.保水剂施用量对秦巴山区土壤特性及烤烟生长的影响[J].浙江大学学报(农业与生命科学版),2019,45(3):343-354. |
BAI G S, GENG W, HE D F. Effects of super absorbent polymer with different application rates on soil characteristics and flue-cured tobacco growth in Qinba mountain area [J]. J. Zhejiang Univ. (Agric. Life Sci.), 2019, 45(3):343-354. | |
35 | 王维,陈建军,吕永华,等.烤烟氮素营养诊断及精准施肥模式研究[J].农业工程学报,2012,28(9):77-84. |
WANG W, CHEN J J, LYU Y H, et al.. Research on nitrogen the nutrition diagnosis and precision fertilization model for flue-cured tobacco [J]. Trans. Chin. Soc. Agric. Eng., 2012, 28(9):77-84. | |
36 | 王方玲, 张明月,周亚茹,等.干旱胁迫下TS-PAA保水剂对雪茄烟生长发育和光合特性的影响[J].中国农业科技导报,2022,24(4):162-172. |
WANG F L, ZHANG M Y, ZHOU Y R, et al.. Effects of TS-PAA water retaining agent on growth and photosynthesis characteristics of cigar under drought stress [J]. J. Agric. Sci. Technol., 2022, 24(4):162-172. | |
37 | 张荠文.保水剂对玉米生长发育及产量的影响[J].陕西水利,2020(10):187-188, 191. |
38 | 杜甫,云菲,姬小明,等.新型复合水凝胶AM/HAK的制备及其对烟草生长发育的影响[J].中国烟草学报,2021,27(1):74-82. |
DU F, YUN F, JI X M, et al.. Preparation of a new composite hydrogel AM/HAK and its effect on the growth and development of tobacco [J]. Acta Tobacco Sin., 2021, 27(1):74-82. | |
39 | 杨永辉,吴普特,武继承,等.保水剂对冬小麦土壤水分和光合生理特征的影响[J].中国水土保持科学,2010, 8(5):36-41. |
YANG Y H, WU P T, WU J C, et al.. Effects of water-retaining agent on soil moisture photosynthesis characteristics of Triticum aestivum L [J]. China Soil Water Conserv. Sci., 2010, 8(5):36-41. |
[1] | 郑淑琳, 石玉涛, 王飞权, 吴邦强, 李远华, 张渤, 叶乃兴. 不同茶树种质资源花器矿质元素含量分析与综合评价[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2023, 25(4): 178-188. |
[2] | 李志元, 江虹, 马艳, 姜秀梅, 张力方, 梁志国, 王泽鹏, 唐亮, 梁肖, 秦勇. 氮水平对雪菊幼苗中黄酮类化合物和矿质营养累积的影响[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2022, 24(9): 208-216. |
[3] | 王方玲, 张明月, 周亚茹, 管庆林, 李欣燕, 钟秋, 赵铭钦. 干旱胁迫下TS-PAA保水剂对雪茄烟生长发育和光合特性的影响[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2022, 24(4): 162-172. |
[4] | 程云霞§, 吴慧§, 刘迁杰, 时振宇, 贾凯, 陈奕琳, 俞安伟, 申金秀. 不同剂量保水剂对袋式复合沙培辣椒生长发育及品质的影响[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2021, 23(8): 55-62. |
[5] | 叶江华, 刘德发, 刘国英, 刘扬, 张奇, 徐斌, 吴林春, 贾小丽. 不同等级武夷水仙茶品质和矿质元素差异分析[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2021, 23(6): 105-112. |
[6] | 邓弋戈, 丁松爽, 朱家明, 田煜利, 乔保明, 时向东. 晾制密度对雪茄烟主要含氮化合物变化规律的影响[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2021, 23(5): 168-175. |
[7] | 石玉涛1,郑淑琳1,王飞权1,陈荣冰1,李远华1,张渤1,王涵2,林立2. 武夷名丛茶树种质资源矿质元素含量特征分析[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2020, 22(7): 37-50. |
[8] | 宋燕平1,喻阳华2*,杨丹丽1,罗晶1. 顶坛花椒不同种植基地土壤肥力质量研究[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2019, 21(9): 125-136. |
[9] | 许美玲1,贺晓辉2,宋玉川2,樊有银2,李永平1. 雪茄烟种质常规化学成分、多酚与感官质量的相关性分析[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2019, 21(6): 124-134. |
[10] | 崔纪菡1,2,赵宇1,刘 猛1,宋世佳1,南春梅1,刘 斐1,. 不同品种小米矿质元素含量差异分析[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2017, 19(8): 84-91. |
[11] | 程红胜1,沈玉君1,孟海波1*,湛世界1,2. 生物炭基保水剂对土壤水分及油菜生长的影响[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2017, 19(2): 86-92. |
[12] | 陈芳泉1,邵惠芳1*,崔登科2,王凯悦1,许自成1,黄五星1,范艺宽3,张慢慢4,赵蓉蓉1. 保水剂对烟草生理特性的影响[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2017, 19(1): 51-57. |
[13] | 代邹,王春雨,李娜,蒋明金,严奉君,徐徽,孙永健,马均*. 硒、硅配施对镉胁迫下杂交稻中镉及矿质元素的影响[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2017, 19(1): 108-117. |
[14] | 陈芳泉1,邵惠芳1*,贾国涛1,许自成1,黄五星1,范艺宽2,杜修智3,张慢慢1,赵蓉蓉1. 保水剂对烟草光合特性和叶绿素荧光参数的影响[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2016, 18(5): 157-163. |
[15] | 王春艳1,李茂松1*,何爽2,王秀芬1. 保水剂对新疆棉花生长发育和产量的影响[J]. , 2012, 14(6): 108-115. |
阅读次数 | ||||||
全文 |
|
|||||
摘要 |
|
|||||