中国农业科技导报 ›› 2024, Vol. 26 ›› Issue (7): 50-60.DOI: 10.13304/j.nykjdb.2022.0987
马力1,2(), 曹婷婷1,2, 范又维1, 任志雨2, 刘春1(
), 袁素霞1(
)
收稿日期:
2022-11-14
接受日期:
2023-05-12
出版日期:
2024-07-15
发布日期:
2024-07-12
通讯作者:
刘春,袁素霞
作者简介:
马力 E-mail: 727809469@qq.com
基金资助:
Li MA1,2(), Tingting CAO1,2, Youwei FAN1, Zhiyu REN2, Chun LIU1(
), Suxia YUAN1(
)
Received:
2022-11-14
Accepted:
2023-05-12
Online:
2024-07-15
Published:
2024-07-12
Contact:
Chun LIU,Suxia YUAN
摘要:
微型盆栽月季具有重要的观赏价值。目前在国内栽培生产中,微型盆栽月季种苗工厂化生产程度低、质量良莠不齐,严重影响了其成品花的商品价值。研究微型盆栽月季的扦插繁育技术以提高微型盆栽月季种苗的质量在微型盆栽月季栽培生产中具有重要的实践意义。为分析不同生根试剂对4个微型盆栽月季品种扦插生根的影响,设置不同水平的中蔬根保201、吲哚-3-丁酸(indole-3-butyric acid,IBA)、萘乙酸(1-naphthlcetic acid,NAA)、2,4-二氯苯氧乙酸(2,4-Dichlorophenoxyacetic acid,2,4-D)溶液以及部分试剂组合为生根试剂处理,并以清水(CK1)和公司常用试剂处理(CK2,由紫玉花卉产业有限公司提供的生根粉剂)为对照,利用主成分分析法对各品种扦插苗根系性状指标进行综合评价,以筛选扦插繁殖的最佳生根试剂。结果表明,在单一生根试剂处理中,CK2处理在所有品种均表现较优,能有效促进根系生长;另外, IBA和中蔬根保201溶液对扦插苗根系的生长发育也具有很好的促进作用,且它们的组合处理对所有供试品种的扦插苗根系生长发育也均有很好的促进效果,优于CK2。其中,0.67 mL·L-1的中蔬根保201 溶液与1 500 mg·L-1的IBA溶液的混合液处理所有品种扦插苗的根系生长情况都非常优异。
中图分类号:
马力, 曹婷婷, 范又维, 任志雨, 刘春, 袁素霞. 不同生根试剂对微型盆栽月季扦插生根的影响[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2024, 26(7): 50-60.
Li MA, Tingting CAO, Youwei FAN, Zhiyu REN, Chun LIU, Suxia YUAN. Effects of Different Rooting Reagents on Rooting of Miniature Potted Rose Cuttings[J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2024, 26(7): 50-60.
处理Treatment | 生根试剂Rooting reagent | 含量 Content |
---|---|---|
CK1 | 清水Water | — |
CK2 | 生根粉剂Rooting powder | — |
Tr1 | 中蔬根保201 Zhongshugenbao 201 | 2.00 mL·L-1 |
Tr2 | 1.00 m L·L-1 | |
Tr3 | 0.67 m L·L-1 | |
Tr4 | IBA | 500 mg·L-1 |
Tr5 | 1 000 mg·L-1 | |
Tr6 | 1 500 mg·L-1 | |
Tr7 | NAA | 300 mg·L-1 |
Tr8 | 800 mg·L-1 | |
Tr9 | 1 300 mg·L-1 | |
Tr10 | 2,4-D | 100 mg·L-1 |
Tr11 | 300 mg·L-1 | |
Tr12 | 500 mg·L-1 | |
Tr13 | 中蔬根保201+IBA Zhongshugenbao 201+IBA | 2.00 mL·L-1+500 mg·L-1 |
Tr14 | 2.00 mL·L-1+1 000 mg·L-1 | |
Tr15 | 2.00 mL·L-1+1 500 mg·L-1 | |
Tr16 | 1.00 mL·L-1+500 mg·L-1 | |
Tr17 | 1.00 mL·L-1+1 000 mg·L-1 | |
Tr18 | 1.00 mL·L-1+1 500 mg·L-1 | |
Tr19 | 0.67 mL·L-1+500 mg·L-1 | |
Tr20 | 0.67 mL·L-1+1 000 mg·L-1 | |
Tr21 | 0.67 mL·L-1+1 500 mg·L-1 |
表1 生根试剂种类与含量
Table 1 Types and content of rooting reagent
处理Treatment | 生根试剂Rooting reagent | 含量 Content |
---|---|---|
CK1 | 清水Water | — |
CK2 | 生根粉剂Rooting powder | — |
Tr1 | 中蔬根保201 Zhongshugenbao 201 | 2.00 mL·L-1 |
Tr2 | 1.00 m L·L-1 | |
Tr3 | 0.67 m L·L-1 | |
Tr4 | IBA | 500 mg·L-1 |
Tr5 | 1 000 mg·L-1 | |
Tr6 | 1 500 mg·L-1 | |
Tr7 | NAA | 300 mg·L-1 |
Tr8 | 800 mg·L-1 | |
Tr9 | 1 300 mg·L-1 | |
Tr10 | 2,4-D | 100 mg·L-1 |
Tr11 | 300 mg·L-1 | |
Tr12 | 500 mg·L-1 | |
Tr13 | 中蔬根保201+IBA Zhongshugenbao 201+IBA | 2.00 mL·L-1+500 mg·L-1 |
Tr14 | 2.00 mL·L-1+1 000 mg·L-1 | |
Tr15 | 2.00 mL·L-1+1 500 mg·L-1 | |
Tr16 | 1.00 mL·L-1+500 mg·L-1 | |
Tr17 | 1.00 mL·L-1+1 000 mg·L-1 | |
Tr18 | 1.00 mL·L-1+1 500 mg·L-1 | |
Tr19 | 0.67 mL·L-1+500 mg·L-1 | |
Tr20 | 0.67 mL·L-1+1 000 mg·L-1 | |
Tr21 | 0.67 mL·L-1+1 500 mg·L-1 |
性状 Trait | 性状编号 Trait code | 最大值 Maximum | 最小值 Minimum | 极差 Range | 平均数 Mean value | 标准差 Standard deviation | 变异系数 Coefficient of variation/% |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
根数 Number of roots | X1 | 22.60 | 0.00 | 22.60 | 7.47 | 3.23 | 43.23 |
根鲜重 Fresh root weight/g | X2 | 0.99 | 0.00 | 0.99 | 0.41 | 0.12 | 28.40 |
生根率 Rooting rate/% | X3 | 100.00 | 15.56 | 84.44 | 87.66 | 20.54 | 23.43 |
表2 单一生根试剂处理下扦插苗根系性状指标变异情况
Table 2 Variability of cutting seedling root traits under the single rooting reagent treatment
性状 Trait | 性状编号 Trait code | 最大值 Maximum | 最小值 Minimum | 极差 Range | 平均数 Mean value | 标准差 Standard deviation | 变异系数 Coefficient of variation/% |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
根数 Number of roots | X1 | 22.60 | 0.00 | 22.60 | 7.47 | 3.23 | 43.23 |
根鲜重 Fresh root weight/g | X2 | 0.99 | 0.00 | 0.99 | 0.41 | 0.12 | 28.40 |
生根率 Rooting rate/% | X3 | 100.00 | 15.56 | 84.44 | 87.66 | 20.54 | 23.43 |
处理 Treatment | Apollo Jewel | Rose Terrazza Pisce | Juicy Terrazza | Cinderella | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
根数 Number of roots | 根鲜重 Fresh root weight/g | 生根率 Rooting rate/% | 根数 Number of roots | 根鲜重 Fresh root weight/g | 生根率 Rooting rate/% | 根数 Number of roots | 根鲜重 Fresh root weight/g | 生根率 Rooting rate/% | 根数 Number of roots | 根鲜重 Fresh root weight/g | 生根率 Rooting rate/% | |
CK1 | 8.44±0.45 c | 0.34±0.02 c | 100.00±0.00 a | 3.91±0.41 def | 0.32±0.02 f | 93.33±3.33 abcd | 6.51±0.44 defg | 0.46±0.03 bcd | 97.78±2.22 ab | 6.84±0.26 fgh | 0.42±0.02 bcd | 100.00±0.00 a |
CK2 | 8.53±0.39 c | 0.41±0.02 bc | 100.00±0.00 a | 6.49±0.34 bc | 0.42±0.02 cde | 100.00±0.00 a | 11.84±0.60 b | 0.54±0.02 b | 100.00±0.00 a | 9.36±0.54 bc | 0.33±0.03 ef | 100.00±0.00 a |
Tr1 | 7.60±0.57 cde | 0.43±0.03 bc | 95.56±2.94 a | 3.04±0.27 f | 0.28±0.02 f | 88.89±3.51 abcde | 8.11±0.42 cd | 0.45±0.02 cd | 100.00±0.00 a | 6.93±0.42 fgh | 0.45±0.03 abc | 100.00±0.00 a |
Tr2 | 8.22±0.41 cd | 0.44±0.02 bc | 100.00±0.00 a | 3.00±0.42 f | 0.33±0.03 f | 88.89±3.51 abcde | 7.51±0.38 cdef | 0.45±0.02 cd | 100.00±0.00 a | 6.07±0.30 h | 0.42±0.04 bcd | 93.33±3.33 b |
Tr3 | 7.24±0.51 cde | 0.34±0.02 c | 97.78±2.22 a | 3.78±0.32 ef | 0.34±0.03 ef | 95.56±2.94 abc | 6.07±0.32 efg | 0.41±0.02 cd | 100.00±0.00 a | 6.33±0.21 gh | 0.43±0.02 abcd | 100.00±0.00 a |
Tr4 | 9.02±0.58 c | 0.50±0.03 b | 97.78±2.22 a | 6.76±0.52 b | 0.44±0.02 bcd | 97.78±2.22 ab | 8.73±0.38 c | 0.39±0.02 d | 100.00±0.00 a | 10.00±0.52 b | 0.33±0.01 ef | 100.00±0.00 a |
Tr5 | 12.20±0.91 b | 0.61±0.04 a | 95.56±2.94 a | 9.84±0.72 a | 0.53±0.04 a | 95.56±2.94 abc | 12.16±1.12 b | 0.49±0.02 bc | 100.00±0.00 a | 14.53±0.83 a | 0.50±0.04 ab | 100.00±0.00 a |
Tr6 | 15.11±1.22 a | 0.68±0.03 a | 100.00±0.00 a | 10.04±0.75 a | 0.49±0.02 abc | 82.22±4.01 cdef | 16.73±1.18 a | 0.66±0.05 a | 100.00±0.00 a | 15.27±0.68 a | 0.46±0.04 abc | 95.56±2.94 ab |
Tr7 | 5.58±0.35 e | 0.49±0.05 b | 80.00±5.77 a | 5.07±0.44 cde | 0.51±0.04 ab | 91.11±4.84 abcd | 5.47±0.31 g | 0.44±0.03 cd | 80.00±0.00 a | 7.67±0.30 defg | 0.52±0.02 a | 100.00±0.00 a |
Tr8 | 6.38±0.45 de | 0.48±0.02 b | 91.11±3.51 ab | 4.09±0.34 def | 0.43±0.02 bcd | 80.00±4.71 def | 5.58±0.55 fg | 0.40±0.03 d | 93.33±4.71 bc | 8.22±0.52 cdef | 0.40±0.03 cde | 100.00±0.00 a |
Tr9 | 5.64±0.74 e | 0.43±0.08 bc | 84.44±8.68 ab | 5.33±0.36 bcd | 0.50±0.04 abc | 73.33±4.71 f | 5.36±0.27 g | 0.44±0.02 cd | 91.11±3.51 c | 8.73±0.40 bcd | 0.46±0.02 abc | 100.00± 0.00 a |
Tr10 | 3.13±0.44 f | 0.19±0.03 d | 46.67±6.67 c | 5.96±0.61 bc | 0.37±0.04 def | 84.44±7.29 bcdef | 8.78±0.63 c | 0.38±0.02 d | 80.00±0.00 d | 8.53±0.36 cde | 0.46±0.02 abc | 95.56±2.94 ab |
Tr11 | 1.24±0.44 f | 0.08±0.03 d | 15.56±4.44 d | 6.24±0.64 bc | 0.29±0.03 f | 57.78±5.21 g | 7.69±0.67 cde | 0.27±0.03 e | 44.44±2.94 e | 8.84±0.20 bcd | 0.35±0.02 def | 100.00±0.00 a |
Tr12 | 2.36±0.96 f | 0.13±0.06 d | 28.89±10.60 d | 6.56±0.39 bc | 0.30±0.02 f | 75.56±5.56 ef | 2.49±0.79 h | 0.09±0.02 f | 15.56±2.94 f | 7.29±0.39 efgh | 0.30±0.02 f | 84.44±2.94 c |
表3 单一生根试剂处理下扦插苗根系的生长
Table 3 Growth and development of root of the cutting seedlings under single rooting reagen treatments
处理 Treatment | Apollo Jewel | Rose Terrazza Pisce | Juicy Terrazza | Cinderella | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
根数 Number of roots | 根鲜重 Fresh root weight/g | 生根率 Rooting rate/% | 根数 Number of roots | 根鲜重 Fresh root weight/g | 生根率 Rooting rate/% | 根数 Number of roots | 根鲜重 Fresh root weight/g | 生根率 Rooting rate/% | 根数 Number of roots | 根鲜重 Fresh root weight/g | 生根率 Rooting rate/% | |
CK1 | 8.44±0.45 c | 0.34±0.02 c | 100.00±0.00 a | 3.91±0.41 def | 0.32±0.02 f | 93.33±3.33 abcd | 6.51±0.44 defg | 0.46±0.03 bcd | 97.78±2.22 ab | 6.84±0.26 fgh | 0.42±0.02 bcd | 100.00±0.00 a |
CK2 | 8.53±0.39 c | 0.41±0.02 bc | 100.00±0.00 a | 6.49±0.34 bc | 0.42±0.02 cde | 100.00±0.00 a | 11.84±0.60 b | 0.54±0.02 b | 100.00±0.00 a | 9.36±0.54 bc | 0.33±0.03 ef | 100.00±0.00 a |
Tr1 | 7.60±0.57 cde | 0.43±0.03 bc | 95.56±2.94 a | 3.04±0.27 f | 0.28±0.02 f | 88.89±3.51 abcde | 8.11±0.42 cd | 0.45±0.02 cd | 100.00±0.00 a | 6.93±0.42 fgh | 0.45±0.03 abc | 100.00±0.00 a |
Tr2 | 8.22±0.41 cd | 0.44±0.02 bc | 100.00±0.00 a | 3.00±0.42 f | 0.33±0.03 f | 88.89±3.51 abcde | 7.51±0.38 cdef | 0.45±0.02 cd | 100.00±0.00 a | 6.07±0.30 h | 0.42±0.04 bcd | 93.33±3.33 b |
Tr3 | 7.24±0.51 cde | 0.34±0.02 c | 97.78±2.22 a | 3.78±0.32 ef | 0.34±0.03 ef | 95.56±2.94 abc | 6.07±0.32 efg | 0.41±0.02 cd | 100.00±0.00 a | 6.33±0.21 gh | 0.43±0.02 abcd | 100.00±0.00 a |
Tr4 | 9.02±0.58 c | 0.50±0.03 b | 97.78±2.22 a | 6.76±0.52 b | 0.44±0.02 bcd | 97.78±2.22 ab | 8.73±0.38 c | 0.39±0.02 d | 100.00±0.00 a | 10.00±0.52 b | 0.33±0.01 ef | 100.00±0.00 a |
Tr5 | 12.20±0.91 b | 0.61±0.04 a | 95.56±2.94 a | 9.84±0.72 a | 0.53±0.04 a | 95.56±2.94 abc | 12.16±1.12 b | 0.49±0.02 bc | 100.00±0.00 a | 14.53±0.83 a | 0.50±0.04 ab | 100.00±0.00 a |
Tr6 | 15.11±1.22 a | 0.68±0.03 a | 100.00±0.00 a | 10.04±0.75 a | 0.49±0.02 abc | 82.22±4.01 cdef | 16.73±1.18 a | 0.66±0.05 a | 100.00±0.00 a | 15.27±0.68 a | 0.46±0.04 abc | 95.56±2.94 ab |
Tr7 | 5.58±0.35 e | 0.49±0.05 b | 80.00±5.77 a | 5.07±0.44 cde | 0.51±0.04 ab | 91.11±4.84 abcd | 5.47±0.31 g | 0.44±0.03 cd | 80.00±0.00 a | 7.67±0.30 defg | 0.52±0.02 a | 100.00±0.00 a |
Tr8 | 6.38±0.45 de | 0.48±0.02 b | 91.11±3.51 ab | 4.09±0.34 def | 0.43±0.02 bcd | 80.00±4.71 def | 5.58±0.55 fg | 0.40±0.03 d | 93.33±4.71 bc | 8.22±0.52 cdef | 0.40±0.03 cde | 100.00±0.00 a |
Tr9 | 5.64±0.74 e | 0.43±0.08 bc | 84.44±8.68 ab | 5.33±0.36 bcd | 0.50±0.04 abc | 73.33±4.71 f | 5.36±0.27 g | 0.44±0.02 cd | 91.11±3.51 c | 8.73±0.40 bcd | 0.46±0.02 abc | 100.00± 0.00 a |
Tr10 | 3.13±0.44 f | 0.19±0.03 d | 46.67±6.67 c | 5.96±0.61 bc | 0.37±0.04 def | 84.44±7.29 bcdef | 8.78±0.63 c | 0.38±0.02 d | 80.00±0.00 d | 8.53±0.36 cde | 0.46±0.02 abc | 95.56±2.94 ab |
Tr11 | 1.24±0.44 f | 0.08±0.03 d | 15.56±4.44 d | 6.24±0.64 bc | 0.29±0.03 f | 57.78±5.21 g | 7.69±0.67 cde | 0.27±0.03 e | 44.44±2.94 e | 8.84±0.20 bcd | 0.35±0.02 def | 100.00±0.00 a |
Tr12 | 2.36±0.96 f | 0.13±0.06 d | 28.89±10.60 d | 6.56±0.39 bc | 0.30±0.02 f | 75.56±5.56 ef | 2.49±0.79 h | 0.09±0.02 f | 15.56±2.94 f | 7.29±0.39 efgh | 0.30±0.02 f | 84.44±2.94 c |
品种 Variety | 指标Index | 根数Number of roots | 根鲜重Fresh root weight | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Apollo Jewel | 根鲜重Fresh root weight | 0.888** | |||
生根率Rooting rate | 0.798** | 0.823** | |||
Rose Terrazza Pisce | 根鲜重Fresh root weight | 0.570* | |||
生根率Rooting rate | -0.042 | 0.245 | |||
Juicy Terrazza | 根鲜重Fresh root weight | 0.763** | |||
生根率Rooting rate | 0.489 | 0.856** | |||
Cinderella | 根鲜重Fresh root weight | 0.226 | |||
生根率Rooting rate | 0.107 | 0.363 |
表4 单一生根试剂处理下根系性状指标相关矩阵
Table 4 Correlation matrix of the cutting seedling root traits under the single rooting reagent treatment
品种 Variety | 指标Index | 根数Number of roots | 根鲜重Fresh root weight | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Apollo Jewel | 根鲜重Fresh root weight | 0.888** | |||
生根率Rooting rate | 0.798** | 0.823** | |||
Rose Terrazza Pisce | 根鲜重Fresh root weight | 0.570* | |||
生根率Rooting rate | -0.042 | 0.245 | |||
Juicy Terrazza | 根鲜重Fresh root weight | 0.763** | |||
生根率Rooting rate | 0.489 | 0.856** | |||
Cinderella | 根鲜重Fresh root weight | 0.226 | |||
生根率Rooting rate | 0.107 | 0.363 |
品种 Variety | 主成分 Principal component | 特征值 Eigenvalue | 贡献率 Contribution rate/% | 累计贡献率 Cumulative contribution rate/% |
---|---|---|---|---|
Apollo Jewel | 1 | 2.673 | 89.116 | 89.116 |
2 | 0.217 | 7.224 | 96.339 | |
3 | 0.110 | 3.661 | 100.000 | |
Rose Terrazza Pisce | 1 | 1.606 | 53.525 | 53.525 |
2 | 1.030 | 34.336 | 87.861 | |
3 | 0.364 | 12.139 | 100.000 | |
Juicy Terrazza | 1 | 2.417 | 80.551 | 80.551 |
2 | 0.516 | 17.185 | 97.736 | |
3 | 0.068 | 2.264 | 100.000 | |
Cinderella | 1 | 1.481 | 49.354 | 49.354 |
2 | 0.905 | 30.167 | 79.522 | |
3 | 0.614 | 20.478 | 100.000 |
表5 单一生根试剂处理下根系性状的主成分分析
Table 5 Principal component analysis of root traits under the single rooting reagent treatments
品种 Variety | 主成分 Principal component | 特征值 Eigenvalue | 贡献率 Contribution rate/% | 累计贡献率 Cumulative contribution rate/% |
---|---|---|---|---|
Apollo Jewel | 1 | 2.673 | 89.116 | 89.116 |
2 | 0.217 | 7.224 | 96.339 | |
3 | 0.110 | 3.661 | 100.000 | |
Rose Terrazza Pisce | 1 | 1.606 | 53.525 | 53.525 |
2 | 1.030 | 34.336 | 87.861 | |
3 | 0.364 | 12.139 | 100.000 | |
Juicy Terrazza | 1 | 2.417 | 80.551 | 80.551 |
2 | 0.516 | 17.185 | 97.736 | |
3 | 0.068 | 2.264 | 100.000 | |
Cinderella | 1 | 1.481 | 49.354 | 49.354 |
2 | 0.905 | 30.167 | 79.522 | |
3 | 0.614 | 20.478 | 100.000 |
品种 Variety | 主成分1表达式 Formula of PC1 | 主成分2表达式 Formula of PC2 | D值表达式 Formula of D value |
---|---|---|---|
Apollo Jewel | F1=0.581X1+0.586X2+0.565X3 | — | D=89.116%F1 |
Rose Terrazza Pisce | F1=0.655X1+0.715X2+0.244X3 | F2=-0.392X1+0.046X2+0.919X3 | D=53.525%F1+34.336%F2 |
Juicy Terrazza | F1=0.534X1+0.629X2+0.565X3 | — | D=80.511%F1 |
Cinderella | F1=0.446X1+0.663X2+0.601X3 | F2=0.857X1-0.122X2-0.501X3 | D=49.354%F1+30.167%F2 |
表6 单一生根试剂处理下根系性状主成分及评价值表达式
Table 6 Principal component and evaluation value formula of the root traits under the single rooting reagent treatment
品种 Variety | 主成分1表达式 Formula of PC1 | 主成分2表达式 Formula of PC2 | D值表达式 Formula of D value |
---|---|---|---|
Apollo Jewel | F1=0.581X1+0.586X2+0.565X3 | — | D=89.116%F1 |
Rose Terrazza Pisce | F1=0.655X1+0.715X2+0.244X3 | F2=-0.392X1+0.046X2+0.919X3 | D=53.525%F1+34.336%F2 |
Juicy Terrazza | F1=0.534X1+0.629X2+0.565X3 | — | D=80.511%F1 |
Cinderella | F1=0.446X1+0.663X2+0.601X3 | F2=0.857X1-0.122X2-0.501X3 | D=49.354%F1+30.167%F2 |
排名 Ranking | Apollo Jewel | Rose Terrazza Pisce | Juicy Terrazza | Cinderella | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
处理 Treatment | D值 D value | 处理 Treatment | D值 D value | 处理 Treatment | D值 D value | 处理 Treatment | D值 D value | |
1 | Tr6 | 58.532 | CK2 | 46.130 | Tr6 | 53.043 | Tr5 | 21.669 |
2 | CK2 | 54.982 | Tr4 | 45.207 | Tr5 | 50.989 | Tr6 | 21.360 |
3 | CK1 | 54.899 | Tr5 | 44.920 | CK2 | 50.879 | Tr4 | 19.446 |
4 | Tr2 | 54.838 | Tr3 | 43.535 | Tr4 | 49.464 | CK2 | 19.137 |
5 | Tr5 | 54.750 | CK1 | 42.562 | Tr1 | 49.229 | Tr11 | 18.899 |
6 | Tr4 | 54.164 | Tr7 | 41.897 | Tr2 | 48.970 | Tr9 | 18.877 |
7 | Tr3 | 53.160 | Tr2 | 40.392 | Tr3 | 48.328 | Tr8 | 18.616 |
8 | Tr1 | 52.273 | Tr1 | 40.379 | CK1 | 47.536 | Tr7 | 18.382 |
9 | Tr8 | 49.427 | Tr10 | 39.060 | Tr8 | 45.077 | Tr10 | 18.134 |
10 | Tr9 | 45.662 | Tr6 | 39.004 | Tr9 | 43.991 | Tr1 | 18.011 |
11 | Tr7 | 43.423 | Tr8 | 36.703 | Tr10 | 40.377 | CK1 | 17.960 |
12 | Tr10 | 25.218 | Tr12 | 35.208 | Tr7 | 38.986 | Tr3 | 17.719 |
13 | Tr12 | 15.836 | Tr9 | 34.026 | Tr11 | 23.668 | Tr2 | 16.618 |
14 | Tr11 | 8.519 | Tr11 | 27.213 | Tr12 | 8.196 | Tr12 | 15.875 |
表7 单一生根试剂处理的综合排序
Table 7 Ranking of single root reagent treatments
排名 Ranking | Apollo Jewel | Rose Terrazza Pisce | Juicy Terrazza | Cinderella | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
处理 Treatment | D值 D value | 处理 Treatment | D值 D value | 处理 Treatment | D值 D value | 处理 Treatment | D值 D value | |
1 | Tr6 | 58.532 | CK2 | 46.130 | Tr6 | 53.043 | Tr5 | 21.669 |
2 | CK2 | 54.982 | Tr4 | 45.207 | Tr5 | 50.989 | Tr6 | 21.360 |
3 | CK1 | 54.899 | Tr5 | 44.920 | CK2 | 50.879 | Tr4 | 19.446 |
4 | Tr2 | 54.838 | Tr3 | 43.535 | Tr4 | 49.464 | CK2 | 19.137 |
5 | Tr5 | 54.750 | CK1 | 42.562 | Tr1 | 49.229 | Tr11 | 18.899 |
6 | Tr4 | 54.164 | Tr7 | 41.897 | Tr2 | 48.970 | Tr9 | 18.877 |
7 | Tr3 | 53.160 | Tr2 | 40.392 | Tr3 | 48.328 | Tr8 | 18.616 |
8 | Tr1 | 52.273 | Tr1 | 40.379 | CK1 | 47.536 | Tr7 | 18.382 |
9 | Tr8 | 49.427 | Tr10 | 39.060 | Tr8 | 45.077 | Tr10 | 18.134 |
10 | Tr9 | 45.662 | Tr6 | 39.004 | Tr9 | 43.991 | Tr1 | 18.011 |
11 | Tr7 | 43.423 | Tr8 | 36.703 | Tr10 | 40.377 | CK1 | 17.960 |
12 | Tr10 | 25.218 | Tr12 | 35.208 | Tr7 | 38.986 | Tr3 | 17.719 |
13 | Tr12 | 15.836 | Tr9 | 34.026 | Tr11 | 23.668 | Tr2 | 16.618 |
14 | Tr11 | 8.519 | Tr11 | 27.213 | Tr12 | 8.196 | Tr12 | 15.875 |
性状 Trait | 性状编号 Trait code | 最大值 Maximum | 最小值 Minimum | 极差 Range | 平均值 Mean value | 标准差 Standard deviation | 变异系数 Coefficient of variation/% |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
根数 Number of roots | X1 | 25.89 | 3.27 | 22.62 | 12.61 | 6.20 | 49.22 |
根鲜重 Fresh root weight/g | X2 | 0.71 | 0.25 | 0.46 | 0.49 | 0.11 | 22.07 |
生根率 Rooting rate/% | X3 | 100.00 | 82.22 | 17.78 | 98.69 | 3.05 | 3.09 |
表8 不同生根试剂组合处理条件下扦插苗的根系性状
Table 8 Root traits of cutting seedling under the combination treatments of different rooting reagents
性状 Trait | 性状编号 Trait code | 最大值 Maximum | 最小值 Minimum | 极差 Range | 平均值 Mean value | 标准差 Standard deviation | 变异系数 Coefficient of variation/% |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
根数 Number of roots | X1 | 25.89 | 3.27 | 22.62 | 12.61 | 6.20 | 49.22 |
根鲜重 Fresh root weight/g | X2 | 0.71 | 0.25 | 0.46 | 0.49 | 0.11 | 22.07 |
生根率 Rooting rate/% | X3 | 100.00 | 82.22 | 17.78 | 98.69 | 3.05 | 3.09 |
处理 Treatment | Juicy Terrazza | Cinderella | Apollo Jewel | Rose Terrazza Pisce | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
根数 Number of roots | 根鲜重 Fresh root weight/g | 生根率 Rooting rate/% | 根数 Number of roots | 根鲜重 Fresh root weight/g | 生根率 Rooting rate/% | 根数 Number of roots | 根鲜重 Fresh root weight/g | 生根率 Rooting rate/% | 根数 Number of roots | 根鲜重 Fresh root weight/g | 生根率 Rooting rate/% | |
CK1 | 7.51±0.39 c | 0.43±0.02 cd | 100.00±0.00 a | 7.89±0.44 g | 0.50±0.04 c | 100.00±0.00 a | 6.93±0.43 e | 0.31±0.02 d | 100.00±0.00 a | 3.27±0.58 e | 0.25±0.03 d | 82.22±5.21 b |
CK2 | 9.58±0.44 c | 0.47±0.02 bcd | 100.00±0.00 a | 17.00±0.77 cde | 0.65±0.03 ab | 100.00±0.00 a | 9.04±0.49 cd | 0.36±0.03 cd | 100.00±0.00 a | 4.96±0.27 cd | 0.37±0.02 c | 97.78±2.22 a |
Tr13 | 10.02±0.64 c | 0.51±0.02 bc | 100.00±0.00 a | 14.29±0.96 ef | 0.56±0.04 bc | 100.00±0.00 a | 7.13±0.43 e | 0.31±0.02 d | 100.00±0.00 a | 4.53±0.36 de | 0.40±0.02 bc | 97.78±2.22 a |
Tr14 | 18.73±1.59 b | 0.51±0.03 bc | 100.00±0.00 a | 17.64±0.98 cd | 0.64±0.03 ab | 100.00±0.00 a | 12.33±0.64 b | 0.48±0.03 ab | 100.00±0.00 a | 6.42±0.53 bc | 0.46±0.03 ab | 97.78±2.22 a |
Tr15 | 20.07±1.45 ab | 0.62±0.04 a | 95.56±2.94 a | 24.04±1.24 ab | 0.57±0.04 bc | 93.33±3.33 b | 16.64±0.73 a | 0.48±0.04 ab | 100.00±0.00 a | 7.04±0.54 ab | 0.49±0.03 a | 100.00±0.00 a |
Tr16 | 10.56±0.69 c | 0.41±0.04 cd | 100.00±0.00 a | 14.13±0.51 f | 0.57±0.03 bc | 100.00±0.00 a | 10.04±0.44 c | 0.42±0.03 abc | 100.00±0.00 a | 4.91±0.31 cd | 0.40±0.02 abc | 97.78±2.22 a |
Tr17 | 19.60±1.08 ab | 0.63±0.04 a | 100.00±0.00 a | 18.71±0.55 c | 0.71±0.06 a | 100.00±0.00 a | 10.13±0.39 c | 0.40±0.03 bcd | 97.78±2.22 a | 6.71±0.61 b | 0.42±0.03 abc | 100.00±0.00 a |
Tr18 | 22.84±1.40 a | 0.48±0.02 bcd | 97.78±2.22 a | 24.60±0.94 a | 0.68±0.04 ab | 100.00±0.00 a | 12.33±0.58 b | 0.43±0.03 abc | 100.00±0.00 a | 7.47±0.53 ab | 0.46±0.02 ab | 97.78±2.22 a |
Tr19 | 10.87±0.49 c | 0.40±0.02 d | 100.00±0.00 a | 15.16±0.59 def | 0.66±0.03 ab | 100.00±0.00 a | 7.91±0.32 de | 0.34±0.02 cd | 100.00±0.00 a | 5.11±0.21 cd | 0.43±0.04 abc | 93.33±4.71 a |
Tr20 | 17.47±1.84 b | 0.56±0.05 ab | 95.56±2.94 a | 21.82±1.24 b | 0.61±0.04 abc | 100.00±0.00 a | 11.69±0.65 b | 0.42±0.02 abc | 100.00±0.00 a | 7.78±0.46 ab | 0.45±0.02 abc | 100.00±0.00 a |
Tr21 | 22.47±1.02 a | 0.54±0.04 ab | 100.00±0.00 a | 25.89±1.33 a | 0.66±0.04 ab | 100.00±0.00 a | 12.96±0.64 b | 0.51±0.04 a | 100.00±0.00 a | 8.38±0.82 a | 0.48±0.03 ab | 97.78±2.22 a |
表9 不同生根试剂组合处理下各品种扦插苗的根系生长
Table 9 Root growth of cutting seedling the combination treatments of different rooting reagents
处理 Treatment | Juicy Terrazza | Cinderella | Apollo Jewel | Rose Terrazza Pisce | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
根数 Number of roots | 根鲜重 Fresh root weight/g | 生根率 Rooting rate/% | 根数 Number of roots | 根鲜重 Fresh root weight/g | 生根率 Rooting rate/% | 根数 Number of roots | 根鲜重 Fresh root weight/g | 生根率 Rooting rate/% | 根数 Number of roots | 根鲜重 Fresh root weight/g | 生根率 Rooting rate/% | |
CK1 | 7.51±0.39 c | 0.43±0.02 cd | 100.00±0.00 a | 7.89±0.44 g | 0.50±0.04 c | 100.00±0.00 a | 6.93±0.43 e | 0.31±0.02 d | 100.00±0.00 a | 3.27±0.58 e | 0.25±0.03 d | 82.22±5.21 b |
CK2 | 9.58±0.44 c | 0.47±0.02 bcd | 100.00±0.00 a | 17.00±0.77 cde | 0.65±0.03 ab | 100.00±0.00 a | 9.04±0.49 cd | 0.36±0.03 cd | 100.00±0.00 a | 4.96±0.27 cd | 0.37±0.02 c | 97.78±2.22 a |
Tr13 | 10.02±0.64 c | 0.51±0.02 bc | 100.00±0.00 a | 14.29±0.96 ef | 0.56±0.04 bc | 100.00±0.00 a | 7.13±0.43 e | 0.31±0.02 d | 100.00±0.00 a | 4.53±0.36 de | 0.40±0.02 bc | 97.78±2.22 a |
Tr14 | 18.73±1.59 b | 0.51±0.03 bc | 100.00±0.00 a | 17.64±0.98 cd | 0.64±0.03 ab | 100.00±0.00 a | 12.33±0.64 b | 0.48±0.03 ab | 100.00±0.00 a | 6.42±0.53 bc | 0.46±0.03 ab | 97.78±2.22 a |
Tr15 | 20.07±1.45 ab | 0.62±0.04 a | 95.56±2.94 a | 24.04±1.24 ab | 0.57±0.04 bc | 93.33±3.33 b | 16.64±0.73 a | 0.48±0.04 ab | 100.00±0.00 a | 7.04±0.54 ab | 0.49±0.03 a | 100.00±0.00 a |
Tr16 | 10.56±0.69 c | 0.41±0.04 cd | 100.00±0.00 a | 14.13±0.51 f | 0.57±0.03 bc | 100.00±0.00 a | 10.04±0.44 c | 0.42±0.03 abc | 100.00±0.00 a | 4.91±0.31 cd | 0.40±0.02 abc | 97.78±2.22 a |
Tr17 | 19.60±1.08 ab | 0.63±0.04 a | 100.00±0.00 a | 18.71±0.55 c | 0.71±0.06 a | 100.00±0.00 a | 10.13±0.39 c | 0.40±0.03 bcd | 97.78±2.22 a | 6.71±0.61 b | 0.42±0.03 abc | 100.00±0.00 a |
Tr18 | 22.84±1.40 a | 0.48±0.02 bcd | 97.78±2.22 a | 24.60±0.94 a | 0.68±0.04 ab | 100.00±0.00 a | 12.33±0.58 b | 0.43±0.03 abc | 100.00±0.00 a | 7.47±0.53 ab | 0.46±0.02 ab | 97.78±2.22 a |
Tr19 | 10.87±0.49 c | 0.40±0.02 d | 100.00±0.00 a | 15.16±0.59 def | 0.66±0.03 ab | 100.00±0.00 a | 7.91±0.32 de | 0.34±0.02 cd | 100.00±0.00 a | 5.11±0.21 cd | 0.43±0.04 abc | 93.33±4.71 a |
Tr20 | 17.47±1.84 b | 0.56±0.05 ab | 95.56±2.94 a | 21.82±1.24 b | 0.61±0.04 abc | 100.00±0.00 a | 11.69±0.65 b | 0.42±0.02 abc | 100.00±0.00 a | 7.78±0.46 ab | 0.45±0.02 abc | 100.00±0.00 a |
Tr21 | 22.47±1.02 a | 0.54±0.04 ab | 100.00±0.00 a | 25.89±1.33 a | 0.66±0.04 ab | 100.00±0.00 a | 12.96±0.64 b | 0.51±0.04 a | 100.00±0.00 a | 8.38±0.82 a | 0.48±0.03 ab | 97.78±2.22 a |
品种Variety | 指标Index | 根数Number of roots | 根鲜重Fresh root weight |
---|---|---|---|
Apollo Jewel | 根鲜重Fresh root weight | 0.898** | |
生根率Rooting rate | 0.059 | 0.026 | |
Rose Terrazza Pisce | 根鲜重Fresh root weight | 0.846** | |
生根率Rooting rate | 0.676* | 0.822** | |
Juicy Terrazza | 根鲜重Fresh root weight | 0.662* | |
生根率Rooting rate | -0.442 | -0.490 | |
Cinderella | 根鲜重Fresh root weight | 0.561 | |
生根率Rooting rate | -0.350 | 0.260 |
表10 不同生根试剂组合处理条件下根系性状指标相关矩阵
Table 10 Correlation matrix of the root traits indexes under the combination treatment of the different rooting reagents
品种Variety | 指标Index | 根数Number of roots | 根鲜重Fresh root weight |
---|---|---|---|
Apollo Jewel | 根鲜重Fresh root weight | 0.898** | |
生根率Rooting rate | 0.059 | 0.026 | |
Rose Terrazza Pisce | 根鲜重Fresh root weight | 0.846** | |
生根率Rooting rate | 0.676* | 0.822** | |
Juicy Terrazza | 根鲜重Fresh root weight | 0.662* | |
生根率Rooting rate | -0.442 | -0.490 | |
Cinderella | 根鲜重Fresh root weight | 0.561 | |
生根率Rooting rate | -0.350 | 0.260 |
品种 Variety | 主成分 Principal component | 特征值 Eigenvalue | 贡献率 Contribution rate/% | 累计贡献率 Cumulative contribution rate/% |
---|---|---|---|---|
Apollo Jewel | 1 | 1.902 | 63.408 | 63.408 |
2 | 0.997 | 33.219 | 96.627 | |
3 | 0.101 | 3.373 | 100.000 | |
Rose Terrazza Pisce | 1 | 2.565 | 85.497 | 85.497 |
2 | 0.325 | 10.831 | 96.329 | |
3 | 0.110 | 3.671 | 100.000 | |
Juicy Terrazza | 1 | 2.068 | 68.931 | 68.930 |
2 | 0.597 | 19.912 | 88.842 | |
3 | 0.335 | 11.158 | 100.000 | |
Cinderella | 1 | 1.572 | 52.383 | 52.383 |
2 | 1.225 | 40.819 | 93.202 | |
3 | 0.204 | 6.798 | 100.000 |
表11 不同生根试剂组合处理条件下根系性状的主成分分析
Table 11 Principal component analysis of root traits under the combination treatments of the different rooting reagents
品种 Variety | 主成分 Principal component | 特征值 Eigenvalue | 贡献率 Contribution rate/% | 累计贡献率 Cumulative contribution rate/% |
---|---|---|---|---|
Apollo Jewel | 1 | 1.902 | 63.408 | 63.408 |
2 | 0.997 | 33.219 | 96.627 | |
3 | 0.101 | 3.373 | 100.000 | |
Rose Terrazza Pisce | 1 | 2.565 | 85.497 | 85.497 |
2 | 0.325 | 10.831 | 96.329 | |
3 | 0.110 | 3.671 | 100.000 | |
Juicy Terrazza | 1 | 2.068 | 68.931 | 68.930 |
2 | 0.597 | 19.912 | 88.842 | |
3 | 0.335 | 11.158 | 100.000 | |
Cinderella | 1 | 1.572 | 52.383 | 52.383 |
2 | 1.225 | 40.819 | 93.202 | |
3 | 0.204 | 6.798 | 100.000 |
品种Variety | 主成分1表达式 Formula of PC 1 | 主成分2表达式 Formula of PC 2 | D值表达式 Formula of D value |
---|---|---|---|
Apollo Jewel | F1=0.706X1+0.705X2+0.067X3 | F2=-0.029X1-0.065X2+0.997X3 | D=63.408%F1+33.219%F2 |
Rose Terrazza Pisce | F1=0.568X1+0.602X2+0.561X3 | — | D=85.497%F1 |
Juicy Terrazza | F1=0.595X1+0.609X2-0.525X3 | F2=0.448X1+0.291X2+0.845 X3 | D=68.931%F1+19.912F2 |
Cinderella | F1=0.739X1+0.656X2-0.155X3 | F2=-0.219X1+0.452X2+0.865X3 | D=52.383%F1+40.819%F2 |
表12 不同生根试剂组合处理条件下根系性状主成分及评价值表达式
Table 12 Principal component and evaluation value formula of the root traits under the combination treatment of the different rooting reagents
品种Variety | 主成分1表达式 Formula of PC 1 | 主成分2表达式 Formula of PC 2 | D值表达式 Formula of D value |
---|---|---|---|
Apollo Jewel | F1=0.706X1+0.705X2+0.067X3 | F2=-0.029X1-0.065X2+0.997X3 | D=63.408%F1+33.219%F2 |
Rose Terrazza Pisce | F1=0.568X1+0.602X2+0.561X3 | — | D=85.497%F1 |
Juicy Terrazza | F1=0.595X1+0.609X2-0.525X3 | F2=0.448X1+0.291X2+0.845 X3 | D=68.931%F1+19.912F2 |
Cinderella | F1=0.739X1+0.656X2-0.155X3 | F2=-0.219X1+0.452X2+0.865X3 | D=52.383%F1+40.819%F2 |
排序 Ranking | Apollo Jewel | Rose Terrazza Pisce | Juicy Terrazza | Cinderella | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
处理 Treatment | D值 D value | 处理 Treatment | D值 D value | 处理 Treatment | D值 D value | 处理 Treatment | D值 D value | |
1 | Tr15 | 44.843 | Tr20 | 51.972 | Tr18 | -7.299 | Tr21 | 35.230 |
2 | Tr21 | 43.239 | Tr15 | 51.638 | Tr21 | -7.887 | Tr18 | 34.855 |
3 | Tr14 | 42.956 | Tr17 | 51.443 | Tr15 | -8.184 | Tr20 | 33.992 |
4 | Tr18 | 42.931 | Tr21 | 51.218 | Tr17 | -9.274 | Tr17 | 33.117 |
5 | Tr20 | 42.645 | Tr18 | 50.764 | Tr20 | -9.513 | Tr15 | 32.821 |
6 | Tr16 | 41.925 | Tr14 | 50.259 | Tr14 | -9.762 | Tr14 | 32.766 |
7 | CK2 | 41.465 | CK2 | 49.496 | Tr19 | -13.743 | CK2 | 32.578 |
8 | Tr17 | 41.128 | Tr16 | 49.492 | Tr16 | -13.892 | Tr19 | 32.034 |
9 | Tr19 | 40.960 | Tr13 | 49.307 | Tr13 | -14.111 | Tr13 | 31.724 |
10 | Tr13 | 40.605 | Tr19 | 47.469 | CK2 | -14.351 | Tr16 | 31.681 |
11 | CK1 | 40.519 | CK1 | 41.151 | CK1 | -15.402 | CK1 | 29.784 |
表13 不同生根试剂组合处理的综合排序
Table 13 Ranking of combination treatments of different rooting reagents
排序 Ranking | Apollo Jewel | Rose Terrazza Pisce | Juicy Terrazza | Cinderella | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
处理 Treatment | D值 D value | 处理 Treatment | D值 D value | 处理 Treatment | D值 D value | 处理 Treatment | D值 D value | |
1 | Tr15 | 44.843 | Tr20 | 51.972 | Tr18 | -7.299 | Tr21 | 35.230 |
2 | Tr21 | 43.239 | Tr15 | 51.638 | Tr21 | -7.887 | Tr18 | 34.855 |
3 | Tr14 | 42.956 | Tr17 | 51.443 | Tr15 | -8.184 | Tr20 | 33.992 |
4 | Tr18 | 42.931 | Tr21 | 51.218 | Tr17 | -9.274 | Tr17 | 33.117 |
5 | Tr20 | 42.645 | Tr18 | 50.764 | Tr20 | -9.513 | Tr15 | 32.821 |
6 | Tr16 | 41.925 | Tr14 | 50.259 | Tr14 | -9.762 | Tr14 | 32.766 |
7 | CK2 | 41.465 | CK2 | 49.496 | Tr19 | -13.743 | CK2 | 32.578 |
8 | Tr17 | 41.128 | Tr16 | 49.492 | Tr16 | -13.892 | Tr19 | 32.034 |
9 | Tr19 | 40.960 | Tr13 | 49.307 | Tr13 | -14.111 | Tr13 | 31.724 |
10 | Tr13 | 40.605 | Tr19 | 47.469 | CK2 | -14.351 | Tr16 | 31.681 |
11 | CK1 | 40.519 | CK1 | 41.151 | CK1 | -15.402 | CK1 | 29.784 |
1 | 李宝光,陈萍,吴罗发,等.江西盆栽微型月季轻简化育苗技术[J].黑龙江农业科学,2018(12):179-180. |
LI B G, CHEN P, WU L F, et al.. Simplified seedling technology of potted miniature rose Jiangxi [J]. Heilongjiang Agric. Sci., 2018 (12):179-180. | |
2 | HU D, HE X R, MA Y Z, et al.. Effects of ABT on the morphogenesis and inclusions of Taxus chinensis (Pilger) Rehd f. baokangsis cutting rooting [J/OL]. Notulae Botanicae Hortic. Agrobotanici Cluj-Napoca, 2021, 49(2):12200 [2022-10-15].. |
3 | SEDAGHATHOOR S, KAYGHOBADI S, TAJVAR Y. Rooting of Mugo pine (Pinus mugo) cuttings as affected by IBA, NAA and planting substrate [J/OL]. For. Syst., 2016, 25(2):eSC08 [2022-10-15]. . |
4 | TIWARI J K, AMEEN G, SANDILYA V K, et al.. Effect of IBA on root development and associated biochemical changes in single-and double-node stem-cuttings of spine gourd [J]. Veget. Sci., 2022, 49(1):33-40. |
5 | 贺爱国,戴艳娇,胡志鑫,等.不同pH条件下IBA和NAA对伴矿景天生根的影响研究[J].中国农学通报,2020,36(22):49-54. |
HE A G, DAI Y J, HU Z X, et al.. Effect of IBA and NAA on root development of sedum plumbizincicola under different pH [J]. Chin. Agric. Sci. Bull., 2020, 36(22):49-54. | |
6 | 徐珊珊,刘小金,徐大平,等. IAA和NAA对降香黄檀扦插繁殖的影响[J].林业科学研究,2021,34(5):168-176. |
XU S S, LIU X J, XU D P, et al.. Influence of IAA and NAA on cutting propagation of Dalbergia odorifera [J]. For. Res., 2021, 34(5):168-176. | |
7 | 张杰,李健康,段安安,等.不同质量浓度NAA、IBA对栓皮栎、蒙古栎黄化嫩枝扦插生根的影响[J].北京林业大学学报,2019,41(7):128-138. |
ZHANG J, LI J K, DUAN A A, et al.. Effects of different concentrations of IBA, NAA on rooting of etiolated shoots of Quercus variabilis and Quercus mongolica [J]. J. Beijing For. Univ., 2019, 41(7):128-138. | |
8 | 王云云,马珊珊,张旌,等.不同抗寒性月季品系的组织培养[J].分子植物育种,2022,20(4):1264-1272. |
WANG Y Y, MA S S, ZHANG J, et al.. The tissue culture on different cold tolerance rose lines [J]. Mol. Plant Breed., 2022, 20(4):1264-1272. | |
9 | 阎增洁,李慧敏,杨萍,等.植物生长调节剂对香水月季原变种扦插生根的影响[J].江西农业学报,2020,32(7):41-44. |
YAN Z J, LI H M, YANG P, et al.. Effects of plant growth regulators on cutting propagation of Rosa odorata var. Odorata [J]. Acta Agric. Jiangxi, 2020, 32(7):41-44. | |
10 | 赵春莉,杨朝苹,刘子平,等.正交设计优化红双喜月季扦插繁殖技术研究[J].安徽农业科学,2021,49(22):70-73. |
ZHAO C L, YANG C P, LIU Z P, et al.. Orthogonal design optimization of red double delight Rosa chinensis cutting propagation technology [J]. J. Anhui Agric. Sci., 2021, 49(22):70-73. | |
11 | 陈妹姑,林兴娥,李新国,等.基于主成分分析和聚类分析的榴莲品质综合评价[J].食品工业科技,2023,44(7):278-286. |
CHEN M G, LIN X E, LI X G, et al.. Comprehensive evaluation of durian quality based on principal component analysis and cluster analysis [J]. Sci. Tech. Food Ind., 2023, 44(7):278-286. | |
12 | 詹磊,徐卓越,蓝国玮,等.基于主成分分析构建混合多糖凝胶品质综合评价模型[J].现代食品科技, 2023,39(4):214-223. |
ZHAN L, XU Z Y, LAN G W, et al.. Constructing a comprehensive evaluation model for assessing the quality of mixed polysaccharide gels on principal component analysis [J]. Mod. Food Sci. Technol., 2023, 39(4):214-223. | |
13 | 陈佩.主成分分析法研究及其在特征提取中的应用[D].西安:陕西师范大学,2014. |
CHEN P. Research on principal component analysis and its application in feature extraction [D]. Xi’an: Shaanxi Normal University, 2014. | |
14 | 王俊花,邵林生,闫建宾,等.基于主成分分析的糯玉米杂交组合农艺性状综合评价[J].山西农业科学,2022,50(7):938-944. |
WANG J H, SHAO L S, YAN J B, et al.. Comprehensive evaluation of agronomic traits based on principal component analysis of waxy cross combinations [J]. J. Shanxi Agric. Sci., 2022, 50(7):938-944. | |
15 | 李琼,常世豪,舒文涛,等.黄淮海地区夏大豆(南片)46份大豆品种(系)农艺性状综合分析[J].新疆农业科学,2021,58(10):1765-1774. |
LI Q, CHANG S H, SHU W T, et al.. Comprehensive analysis of agronomic characters of 46 soybean varieties (lines) of summer soybeans (south) in Huang-huai-hai region [J]. Xinjiang Agric. Sci., 2021, 58(10):1765-1774. | |
16 | 倪永静,姜晓君,卢祖权,等. 30份国内外小麦种质资源主要农艺性状的分析与评价[J].中国农学通报,2020,36(3):16-22. |
NI Y J, JIANG X J, LU Z Q, et al.. 30 worldwide wheat germplasm resources: analysis and evaluation of main agronomic traits [J]. Chin. Agric. Sci. Bull., 2020, 36(3):16-22. | |
17 | SANTHY V, RATHINAVEL K, SARAVANAN M, et al.. Genetic diversity assessment of extant cotton varieties based on principal component analysis (PCA) and cluster analysis of enlisted DUS traits [J]. Elect. J. Plant Breed., 2020, 11(2):430-438. |
18 | 吴超,郭方其,彭娟,等.国外微型月季品种资源主要表型分析及综合评价[J].分子植物育种,2018,16(8):2646-2655. |
WU C, GUO F Q, PENG J, et al.. Main phenotypic analysis and comprehensive evaluation of miniature rose cultivars in foreign countries [J]. Mol. Plant Breeding, 2018, 16(8):2646-2655. | |
19 | 韩霜.22个菊花品种耐阴指标筛选与综合评价分析[J].河北农业大学学报,2015,38(6):46-51. |
HAN S. Low light tolerance screening and comprehensive evaluation of twenty-two chrysanthemum cultivars [J]. J. Agric. Univ. Hebei, 2015, 38(6):46-51. | |
20 | 廖伟彪,张美玲,杨永花,等.植物生长调节剂浓度和处理时间对月季扦插生根的影响[J].甘肃农业大学学报,2012,47(3):47-51. |
LIAO W B, ZHANG M L, YANG Y H, et al.. Effects of different plant growth regulator concentrations and processing times on rooting of Rosa Chinensis cuttings [J]. J. Gansu Agric. Univ., 2012, 47(3):47-51. | |
21 | 闫海霞,卢家仕,黄昌艳,等.萘乙酸和吲哚丁酸对月季扦插成活效果的影响[J].南方农业学报,2013,44(11):1870-1873. |
YAN H X, LU J S, HUANG C Y, et al.. Effects of NAA and IBA on survival of rose hardwood cutting [J]. J. Southern Agric., 2013, 44(11):1870-1873. | |
22 | 曾斌,黄国林,张力,等.9种微型月季嫩枝扦插的生根和萌梢能力差异[J].湖南农业科学,2018(4):62-64. |
ZENG B, HUANG G L, ZHANG L, et al.. Difference of rooting and shoot ability of 9 miniature rose cuttings [J]. Hunan Agric. Sci., 2018(4):62-64. | |
23 | OLAETXEA M, MORA V, BACAICOA E, et al.. Root ABA and H+‐ATPase are key players in the root and shoot growth‐promoting action of humic acids [J/OL]. Plant Direct, 2019, 3(10): e00175 [2022-10-15]. . |
24 | 刘伟,刘景辉,萨如拉,等.腐殖酸水溶肥料对水分胁迫下小麦光合特性及产量的影响[J].中国农学通报,2014,30(3):196-200. |
LIU W, LIU J H, SA R L, et al.. Effect of humic acid water-soluble fertilizer on wheat photosynthetic characteristics and yield under water stress [J]. Chin. Agric. Sci. Bull., 2014, 30(3):196-200. | |
25 | 张宗彩,肖朋,高进华,等.矿源黄腐酸钾对水培绿萝生根发芽影响的研究[J].肥料与健康,2021,48(3):67-71. |
ZHANG Z C, XIAO P, GAO J H, et al.. Study on the effect of mineral potassium fulvic acid on rooting and sprouting of hydroponic Epipremnum Aureum [J]. Fert. Health, 2021, 48(3):67-71. | |
26 | 刘杰,张雄杰,盛晋华,等.肥料类型对盐碱地蒙古黄芪生长与光合特征及药材产量和品质的影响[J].西北植物学报,2021,41(6):1012-1018. |
LIU J, ZHANG X J, SHENG J H, et al.. Effects of fertilizer types on growth, photosynthesis, yield and quality of Astragalus membranaceus var. mongholicus in saline-alkali land [J]. Acta Bot. Bor-Occid. Sin., 2021, 41(6):1012-1018. | |
27 | 吴晓霞,周倩,谢虹,等. 2,4-D和NAA在拟南芥细胞分裂和伸长中的作用分析[J].西北植物学报,2007,27(8):1631-1636. |
WU X X, ZHOU Q, XIE H, et al.. Different effects of 2,4-D and NAA on cell division and elongation in Arabidopsis suspension cells [J]. Acta Bot. Bor-Occid. Sin., 2007,27(8):1631-1636. | |
28 | 姚庆收,姜吉刚,单长民,等.花生毛状根的高频诱导及NAA和2,4-D对花生毛状根生长和白藜芦醇含量的影响[J].药物生物技术,2012,19(6):507-511. |
YAO Q S, JIANG J G, SHAN C M, et al.. High frequency induction of hairy roots and effect of NAA and 2,4-D on peanut hairy roots growth and resveratrol content [J]. Pharma Ceutical Biotech., 2012, 19(6):507-511. | |
29 | DAMAYANTI P, LATUNRA A I, JOHANES E. Embryogenic callus induction of todolo toraja coffee leaf cells (Coffea arabica var. Typica) with the addition of 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid (2,4-D) and furfurylaminopurine (Kinetin) in vitro [C]//IOP Conference Series:Earth and Environmental Science, IOP Publishing, 2021:12044-12051. |
30 | 龚仲幸.植物生长调节剂对藤本月季扦插生根的影响[J].安徽农业科学,2014, 42(28):9719-9724. |
GONG Z X. Effects of plant growth regulators on rooting of vine Rosa Chinensis cuttings [J]. J. Anhui Agric. Sci., 2014, 42(28):9719-9724. | |
31 | 瞿辉,邵和平,叶晓青,等.不同生长素处理对2个微型月季品种扦插生根的影响[J].江苏农业科学,2018,46(19):159-162. |
QU H, SHAO H P, YE X Q, et al.. Impacts of different auxin treatments on cutting rootingof two mini-rose cultivars [J]. Jiangsu Agric. Sci., 2018, 46(19):159-162. | |
32 | 王红梅,管斌.现代月季‘大游行’扦插繁殖对比试验[J].浙江林业科技,2020,40(1):70-75. |
WANG H M, GUAN B. Comparative experiment on propagation by cutting of Rosa hybrida ‘Parade’ [J]. J. Zhejiang For. Sci. Technol., 2018, 46(19):159-162. |
[1] | 曹婷婷, 刘春, 范又维, 马力, 任志雨, 袁素霞, 张军云, 钱遵姚, 杨光炤. 不同氮素供应水平对微型盆栽月季生长发育的影响[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2024, 26(2): 67-79. |
阅读次数 | ||||||
全文 |
|
|||||
摘要 |
|
|||||