中国农业科技导报 ›› 2025, Vol. 27 ›› Issue (1): 138-146.DOI: 10.13304/j.nykjdb.2023.0702
• 动植物健康 • 上一篇
刘锦霖1,2(), 陈莹莹1,2, 蓝晓妹1,2, 陈海永2, 李鹏声1,2, 覃碧3, 杨叶1,2(
)
收稿日期:
2023-09-21
接受日期:
2023-12-18
出版日期:
2025-01-15
发布日期:
2025-01-21
通讯作者:
杨叶
作者简介:
刘锦霖 E-mail:949630416@qq.com;
基金资助:
Jinlin LIU1,2(), Yingying CHEN1,2, Xiaomei LAN1,2, Haiyong CHEN2, Pengsheng LI1,2, Bi QIN3, Ye YANG1,2(
)
Received:
2023-09-21
Accepted:
2023-12-18
Online:
2025-01-15
Published:
2025-01-21
Contact:
Ye YANG
摘要:
为鉴定油梨炭疽病病原菌并筛选合适杀菌剂,在海南省儋州收集哈斯油梨在储存期间疑似炭疽病的油梨果实,对病果的病原菌进行分离并鉴定其种类,依据柯赫氏法则对分离菌株进行致病性测定,并采用菌丝生长速率法对9种杀菌剂进行敏感性测定。结果表明,通过形态学与多基因序列分析法鉴定,4个分离菌株均为炭疽菌(Colletotrichum siamense),对油梨果实有强致病力。供试9种杀菌剂中,咪鲜胺对油梨炭疽菌的毒力最强,平均有效抑制中浓度(EC50)值为0.11 mg·L-1;其次是嘧菌酯、苯醚甲环唑、吡唑醚菌酯、吡噻菌胺和多菌灵,平均EC50值为2.09~4.29 mg·L-1,即这6种杀菌剂对油梨炭疽菌有明显抑菌效果,可作为防治油梨炭疽病的候选药剂。以上研究结果将有助于油梨果实炭疽病的管理及防治策略的制订。
中图分类号:
刘锦霖, 陈莹莹, 蓝晓妹, 陈海永, 李鹏声, 覃碧, 杨叶. 哈斯油梨果实炭疽病病原鉴定及杀菌剂敏感性测定[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2025, 27(1): 138-146.
Jinlin LIU, Yingying CHEN, Xiaomei LAN, Haiyong CHEN, Pengsheng LI, Bi QIN, Ye YANG. Identification and Sensitivity to Fungicides of Pathogen Species of Hass Avocado Fruit Anthracnose[J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2025, 27(1): 138-146.
种 Speices | 菌株标号 Strain No. | GenBank 注册号GenBank registration number | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ITS | ACT | TUB | CHS-1 | GAPDH | ||
炭疽菌 Colletotrichum sp. | SA0016 | KP683152.1 | KP683093.1 | KP852490.1 | KP852449.1 | KP852469.1 |
暹罗炭疽菌 C. siamense | HNPC01 | OR354391.1 | OR365236.1 | OR365248.1 | OR365240.1 | OR365244.1 |
暹罗炭疽菌 C. siamense | HNPC02 | OR354392.1 | OR365237.1 | OR365249.1 | OR365241.1 | OR365245.1 |
暹罗炭疽菌 C. siamense | HNPC03 | OR354393.1 | OR365238.1 | OR365250.1 | OR365242.1 | OR365246.1 |
暹罗炭疽菌 C. siamense | HNPC04 | OR354394.1 | OR365239.1 | OR365251.1 | OR365243.1 | OR365247.1 |
暹罗炭疽菌 C. siamense | ICMP18578 | JX010171.1 | JX009518.1 | JX010404.1 | JX009865.1 | JX009924.1 |
暹罗炭疽菌 C. siamense | CBS133251 | — | KX093986.1 | KX094289.1 | KX094109.1 | KX094186.1 |
果生炭疽菌 C. fructicola | ICMP18581 | JX010165.1 | JX009501.1 | JX009866.1 | JX010405.1 | JX010033.1 |
果生炭疽菌 C. fructicola | CBS125397 | JX010173.1 | JX009581.1 | — | — | JX010032.1 |
芭蕉炭疽菌 C. musae | BL01 | JQ005777.1 | JQ005840.1 | JX010413.1 | JQ005798.1 | JX010050.1 |
胶孢炭疽菌 C. gloeosporioides | BL22 | MN273080.1 | MN273208.1 | MN273240.1 | MN273144.1 | MN273112.1 |
昌平炭疽菌 C. changpingense | MFLUCC15 | KY214473.1 | KY214470.1 | KY214474.1 | KY214471.1 | KY214472.1 |
隐秘炭疽菌 C. aenigma | ICMP18608 | JX010244.1 | JX009443.1 | — | — | JX010044.1 |
长直孢炭疽菌 C. gigasporum | CBS125475 | MH863697.1 | KF687789.1 | KF687874.1 | KF687766.1 | KF687836.1 |
龙血树炭疽菌 C. dracaenophilum | CBS119360 | MG600711.1 | MG600918.1 | MG600978.1 | MG600834.1 | MG600774.1 |
云南炭疽菌 C. yunnanense | CBS132135 | MH865960.1 | JX519239.1 | JX519248.1 | JX519231.1 | JX546706.1 |
表1 本研究系统发育分析中的菌株信息
Table 1 Information on strains in the phylogenetic analysis of this study
种 Speices | 菌株标号 Strain No. | GenBank 注册号GenBank registration number | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ITS | ACT | TUB | CHS-1 | GAPDH | ||
炭疽菌 Colletotrichum sp. | SA0016 | KP683152.1 | KP683093.1 | KP852490.1 | KP852449.1 | KP852469.1 |
暹罗炭疽菌 C. siamense | HNPC01 | OR354391.1 | OR365236.1 | OR365248.1 | OR365240.1 | OR365244.1 |
暹罗炭疽菌 C. siamense | HNPC02 | OR354392.1 | OR365237.1 | OR365249.1 | OR365241.1 | OR365245.1 |
暹罗炭疽菌 C. siamense | HNPC03 | OR354393.1 | OR365238.1 | OR365250.1 | OR365242.1 | OR365246.1 |
暹罗炭疽菌 C. siamense | HNPC04 | OR354394.1 | OR365239.1 | OR365251.1 | OR365243.1 | OR365247.1 |
暹罗炭疽菌 C. siamense | ICMP18578 | JX010171.1 | JX009518.1 | JX010404.1 | JX009865.1 | JX009924.1 |
暹罗炭疽菌 C. siamense | CBS133251 | — | KX093986.1 | KX094289.1 | KX094109.1 | KX094186.1 |
果生炭疽菌 C. fructicola | ICMP18581 | JX010165.1 | JX009501.1 | JX009866.1 | JX010405.1 | JX010033.1 |
果生炭疽菌 C. fructicola | CBS125397 | JX010173.1 | JX009581.1 | — | — | JX010032.1 |
芭蕉炭疽菌 C. musae | BL01 | JQ005777.1 | JQ005840.1 | JX010413.1 | JQ005798.1 | JX010050.1 |
胶孢炭疽菌 C. gloeosporioides | BL22 | MN273080.1 | MN273208.1 | MN273240.1 | MN273144.1 | MN273112.1 |
昌平炭疽菌 C. changpingense | MFLUCC15 | KY214473.1 | KY214470.1 | KY214474.1 | KY214471.1 | KY214472.1 |
隐秘炭疽菌 C. aenigma | ICMP18608 | JX010244.1 | JX009443.1 | — | — | JX010044.1 |
长直孢炭疽菌 C. gigasporum | CBS125475 | MH863697.1 | KF687789.1 | KF687874.1 | KF687766.1 | KF687836.1 |
龙血树炭疽菌 C. dracaenophilum | CBS119360 | MG600711.1 | MG600918.1 | MG600978.1 | MG600834.1 | MG600774.1 |
云南炭疽菌 C. yunnanense | CBS132135 | MH865960.1 | JX519239.1 | JX519248.1 | JX519231.1 | JX546706.1 |
种 Speices | 菌株标号 Strain No. | GenBank 注册号GenBank registration number | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ITS | ACT | TUB | CHS-1 | GAPDH | ||
C. coelogynes | CBS 132504 | MG600713.1 | MG600920.1 | MG600980.1 | MG600836.1 | MG600776.1 |
C. cattleyicola | CBS 17049 | MG600758.1 | MG600963.1 | MG601025.1 | MG600866.1 | MG600819.1 |
大豆炭疽菌C. sojae | CBS 128510 | MG600751.1 | MG600956.1 | MG601018.1 | MG600862.1 | MG600812.1 |
芭蕉生炭疽菌C. musicola | CBS 127557 | MG600737.1 | MG600943.1 | MG601004.1 | MG600854.1 | MG600799.1 |
C. panamense | CBS 125386 | MG600766.1 | MG600970.1 | MG601033.1 | MG600873.1 | MG600826.1 |
C. merremiae | CBS 124955 | MG600765.1 | MG600969.1 | MG601032.1 | MG600872.1 | MG600825.1 |
短孢炭疽菌C. brevisporum | CBS 129958 | MG600763.1 | MG600967.1 | MG601030.1 | MG600870.1 | MG600823.1 |
甘薯毛链孢Monilochaetes infuscans | CBS 869.96 | JQ005780.1 | JQ005843.1 | JQ005864.1 | JQ005801.1 | JX546612.1 |
表1 本研究系统发育分析中的菌株信息 (续表Continued)
Table 1 Information on strains in the phylogenetic analysis of this study
种 Speices | 菌株标号 Strain No. | GenBank 注册号GenBank registration number | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ITS | ACT | TUB | CHS-1 | GAPDH | ||
C. coelogynes | CBS 132504 | MG600713.1 | MG600920.1 | MG600980.1 | MG600836.1 | MG600776.1 |
C. cattleyicola | CBS 17049 | MG600758.1 | MG600963.1 | MG601025.1 | MG600866.1 | MG600819.1 |
大豆炭疽菌C. sojae | CBS 128510 | MG600751.1 | MG600956.1 | MG601018.1 | MG600862.1 | MG600812.1 |
芭蕉生炭疽菌C. musicola | CBS 127557 | MG600737.1 | MG600943.1 | MG601004.1 | MG600854.1 | MG600799.1 |
C. panamense | CBS 125386 | MG600766.1 | MG600970.1 | MG601033.1 | MG600873.1 | MG600826.1 |
C. merremiae | CBS 124955 | MG600765.1 | MG600969.1 | MG601032.1 | MG600872.1 | MG600825.1 |
短孢炭疽菌C. brevisporum | CBS 129958 | MG600763.1 | MG600967.1 | MG601030.1 | MG600870.1 | MG600823.1 |
甘薯毛链孢Monilochaetes infuscans | CBS 869.96 | JQ005780.1 | JQ005843.1 | JQ005864.1 | JQ005801.1 | JX546612.1 |
杀菌剂Fungicide | 剂量Dosage/(mg·L-1) | 溶剂Solvent |
---|---|---|
吡噻菌胺Penthiopyrad | 0.1、0.5、1.0、2.0、5.0 | 丙酮Acetone |
多菌灵Carbendazim | 0.02、0.10、0.50、2.50、12.50 | 0.1 mol·L-1 HCl |
咪鲜胺Prochloraz | 0.01、0.05、0.10、0.20、0.50 | 丙酮Acetone |
苯醚甲环唑Difenoconazole | 0.1、0.5、1.0、2.0、5.0 | 丙酮Acetone |
嘧菌酯Azoxystrobin | 0.1、0.5、1.0、5.0、10.0 | 丙酮Acetone |
吡唑醚菌酯Pyraclostrobin | 0.1、0.5、1.0、5.0、10.0 | 丙酮Acetone |
咯菌腈Fludioxonil | 16、32、48、64、80 | 丙酮Acetone |
百菌清Chlorothalonil | 10、20、40、50、60 | 丙酮Acetone |
溴菌腈Bromothalonil | 50、75、100、150、200 | 丙酮Acetone |
表2 供试杀菌剂及试验剂量
Table 2 Fungicide and final dosages
杀菌剂Fungicide | 剂量Dosage/(mg·L-1) | 溶剂Solvent |
---|---|---|
吡噻菌胺Penthiopyrad | 0.1、0.5、1.0、2.0、5.0 | 丙酮Acetone |
多菌灵Carbendazim | 0.02、0.10、0.50、2.50、12.50 | 0.1 mol·L-1 HCl |
咪鲜胺Prochloraz | 0.01、0.05、0.10、0.20、0.50 | 丙酮Acetone |
苯醚甲环唑Difenoconazole | 0.1、0.5、1.0、2.0、5.0 | 丙酮Acetone |
嘧菌酯Azoxystrobin | 0.1、0.5、1.0、5.0、10.0 | 丙酮Acetone |
吡唑醚菌酯Pyraclostrobin | 0.1、0.5、1.0、5.0、10.0 | 丙酮Acetone |
咯菌腈Fludioxonil | 16、32、48、64、80 | 丙酮Acetone |
百菌清Chlorothalonil | 10、20、40、50、60 | 丙酮Acetone |
溴菌腈Bromothalonil | 50、75、100、150、200 | 丙酮Acetone |
图2 油梨炭疽病病原菌的形态特征A:菌落形态;B:分生孢子团;C:分生孢子
Fig. 2 Morphological characteristics of anthracnose pathogen on avocado fruitsA: Colony morphology; B: Conidial masses; C: Conidia
图3 油梨果实炭疽病致病性测定A:对照;B:接种病菌3 d;C:接种病菌7 d
Fig. 3 Pathogenicity of anthracnose pathogen on avocado fruitsA:Control; B:After inoculation for 3 d; C:After the inoculation for 7 d
杀菌剂 Fungicide | 菌株 Strain | 回归方程 Regression equation | R² | EC50/(mg·L-1) | 平均EC50 Average EC50/(mg·L-1) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
吡噻菌胺Penthiopyrad | HNPC01 | y=-0.397 8x+5.890 0 | 0.89 | 2.24 | 2.86 |
HNPC02 | y=-0.526 6x+6.434 5 | 0.96 | 2.72 | ||
HNPC03 | y=-0.488 8x+6.522 4 | 0.95 | 3.12 | ||
HNPC04 | y=-0.494 3x+6.669 0 | 0.98 | 3.38 | ||
多菌灵Carbendazim | HNPC01 | y=0.413 6x+3.206 9 | 0.98 | 4.34 | 4.29 |
HNPC02 | y=0.421 0x+3.202 8 | 0.97 | 4.27 | ||
HNPC03 | y=0.411 0x+3.263 6 | 0.96 | 4.22 | ||
HNPC04 | y=0.408 7x+3.227 6 | 0.95 | 4.34 | ||
嘧菌酯Azoxystrobin | HNPC01 | y=0.286 8x+4.903 4 | 0.98 | 2.17 | 2.09 |
HNPC02 | y=0.267 0x+4.949 2 | 0.97 | 1.55 | ||
HNPC03 | y=0.303 2x+4.845 6 | 0.99 | 3.23 | ||
HNPC04 | y=0.267 1x+4.958 7 | 0.99 | 1.43 | ||
吡唑醚菌酯Pyraclostrobin | HNPC01 | y=0.212 5x+4.396 2 | 0.88 | 2.84 | 2.71 |
HNPC02 | y=0.263 9x+4.370 8 | 0.91 | 2.38 | ||
HNPC03 | y=0.163 0x+4.453 7 | 0.93 | 3.35 | ||
HNPC04 | y=0.246 7x+4.440 9 | 0.95 | 2.27 | ||
咪鲜胺Prochloraz | HNPC01 | y=0.937 0x+6.002 6 | 0.88 | 0.09 | 0.11 |
HNPC02 | y=1.446 9x+6.323 1 | 0.96 | 0.12 | ||
HNPC03 | y=1.040 4x+6.010 7 | 0.90 | 0.11 | ||
HNPC04 | y=1.289 1x+6.153 5 | 0.93 | 0.13 | ||
苯醚甲环唑Difenoconazole | HNPC01 | y=0.350 0x+4.167 0 | 0.97 | 2.38 | 2.63 |
HNPC02 | y=0.425 5x+3.865 7 | 0.95 | 2.67 | ||
HNPC03 | y=0.335 7x+4.099 5 | 0.97 | 2.68 | ||
HNPC04 | y=0.381 8x+3.940 1 | 0.98 | 2.78 | ||
咯菌腈Fludioxonil | HNPC01 | y=0.619 2x+3.992 7 | 0.96 | 42.35 | 60.19 |
HNPC02 | y=0.593 6x+3.949 1 | 0.94 | 58.94 | ||
HNPC03 | y=0.636 0x+3.822 2 | 0.98 | 71.12 | ||
HNPC04 | y=0.614 3x+3.872 9 | 0.97 | 68.36 | ||
百菌清Chlorothalonil | HNPC01 | y=2.218 1x+1.697 5 | 0.97 | 30.82 | 31.03 |
HNPC02 | y=2.071 3x+2.198 7 | 0.94 | 22.51 | ||
HNPC03 | y=2.085 4x+1.714 6 | 0.94 | 37.62 | ||
HNPC04 | y=1.793 6x+2.272 5 | 0.93 | 33.16 | ||
溴菌腈Bromothalonil | HNPC01 | y=2.453 9x+0.121 0 | 0.96 | 97.33 | 114.33 |
HNPC02 | y=1.506 0x+2.165 4 | 0.87 | 81.43 | ||
HNPC03 | y=1.352 3x+2.099 3 | 0.98 | 152.11 | ||
HNPC04 | y=2.141 9x+0.583 1 | 0.96 | 126.48 |
表3 4株油梨炭疽菌对9种杀菌剂的敏感性
Table 3 Sensitivity of 4 strains of Colletotrichum siamense from avocado to 9 fungicides
杀菌剂 Fungicide | 菌株 Strain | 回归方程 Regression equation | R² | EC50/(mg·L-1) | 平均EC50 Average EC50/(mg·L-1) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
吡噻菌胺Penthiopyrad | HNPC01 | y=-0.397 8x+5.890 0 | 0.89 | 2.24 | 2.86 |
HNPC02 | y=-0.526 6x+6.434 5 | 0.96 | 2.72 | ||
HNPC03 | y=-0.488 8x+6.522 4 | 0.95 | 3.12 | ||
HNPC04 | y=-0.494 3x+6.669 0 | 0.98 | 3.38 | ||
多菌灵Carbendazim | HNPC01 | y=0.413 6x+3.206 9 | 0.98 | 4.34 | 4.29 |
HNPC02 | y=0.421 0x+3.202 8 | 0.97 | 4.27 | ||
HNPC03 | y=0.411 0x+3.263 6 | 0.96 | 4.22 | ||
HNPC04 | y=0.408 7x+3.227 6 | 0.95 | 4.34 | ||
嘧菌酯Azoxystrobin | HNPC01 | y=0.286 8x+4.903 4 | 0.98 | 2.17 | 2.09 |
HNPC02 | y=0.267 0x+4.949 2 | 0.97 | 1.55 | ||
HNPC03 | y=0.303 2x+4.845 6 | 0.99 | 3.23 | ||
HNPC04 | y=0.267 1x+4.958 7 | 0.99 | 1.43 | ||
吡唑醚菌酯Pyraclostrobin | HNPC01 | y=0.212 5x+4.396 2 | 0.88 | 2.84 | 2.71 |
HNPC02 | y=0.263 9x+4.370 8 | 0.91 | 2.38 | ||
HNPC03 | y=0.163 0x+4.453 7 | 0.93 | 3.35 | ||
HNPC04 | y=0.246 7x+4.440 9 | 0.95 | 2.27 | ||
咪鲜胺Prochloraz | HNPC01 | y=0.937 0x+6.002 6 | 0.88 | 0.09 | 0.11 |
HNPC02 | y=1.446 9x+6.323 1 | 0.96 | 0.12 | ||
HNPC03 | y=1.040 4x+6.010 7 | 0.90 | 0.11 | ||
HNPC04 | y=1.289 1x+6.153 5 | 0.93 | 0.13 | ||
苯醚甲环唑Difenoconazole | HNPC01 | y=0.350 0x+4.167 0 | 0.97 | 2.38 | 2.63 |
HNPC02 | y=0.425 5x+3.865 7 | 0.95 | 2.67 | ||
HNPC03 | y=0.335 7x+4.099 5 | 0.97 | 2.68 | ||
HNPC04 | y=0.381 8x+3.940 1 | 0.98 | 2.78 | ||
咯菌腈Fludioxonil | HNPC01 | y=0.619 2x+3.992 7 | 0.96 | 42.35 | 60.19 |
HNPC02 | y=0.593 6x+3.949 1 | 0.94 | 58.94 | ||
HNPC03 | y=0.636 0x+3.822 2 | 0.98 | 71.12 | ||
HNPC04 | y=0.614 3x+3.872 9 | 0.97 | 68.36 | ||
百菌清Chlorothalonil | HNPC01 | y=2.218 1x+1.697 5 | 0.97 | 30.82 | 31.03 |
HNPC02 | y=2.071 3x+2.198 7 | 0.94 | 22.51 | ||
HNPC03 | y=2.085 4x+1.714 6 | 0.94 | 37.62 | ||
HNPC04 | y=1.793 6x+2.272 5 | 0.93 | 33.16 | ||
溴菌腈Bromothalonil | HNPC01 | y=2.453 9x+0.121 0 | 0.96 | 97.33 | 114.33 |
HNPC02 | y=1.506 0x+2.165 4 | 0.87 | 81.43 | ||
HNPC03 | y=1.352 3x+2.099 3 | 0.98 | 152.11 | ||
HNPC04 | y=2.141 9x+0.583 1 | 0.96 | 126.48 |
1 | PEDRESCHI R, VIRGILIO U, CLAUDIA F, et al.. Primary metabolism in avocado fruit [J/OL]. Front. Plant Sci., 2019, 10:795 [2023-08-10]. . |
2 | 付小猛,毛加梅,董美超,等.世界及中国鳄梨产销概况与展望[J].中国果树,2019(6):109-113. |
3 | 禾本.全球:2030年鳄梨产销预测[J].中国果业信息,2021,38(8):36-37. |
4 | 张良,张德生,刘康德.海南省油梨产业发展的环境分析与对策[J].中国农业资源与区划, 2015,36(4):78-84. |
ZHANG L, ZHANG D S, LIU K D. Environment analysis and policy for development of avocado industry Hainan [J]. Chin. J. Agric. Res. Reg. Plan., 2015, 36(4):78-84. | |
5 | 奎国秀,祁春节,李冬梅,等.全球牛油果产业发展态势及对我国牛油果产业发展的思考[J].中国果树,2023(1):122-127. |
6 | BUSTAMANTE M I, CLAUDIO O N, YSADORA F, et al.. First record of Colletotrichum anthrisci causing anthracnose on avocado fruits in Chile [J/OL]. Pathogens, 2022, 11(10):1204 [2023-08-10]. . |
7 | GIBLIN F R, TAN Y P, MITCHELL R, et al.. Colletotrichum species associated with pre- and post-harvest diseases of avocado and mango in eastern Australia [J]. Aust. Plant Path., 2018, 47(3):269-276. |
8 | KIMARU S K, MONDA E, CHERUIYOT R C, et al.. Morphological and molecular identification of the causal agent of anthracnose disease of avocado in Kenya [J]. Int. J. Microbiol., 2018(4):1-10. |
9 | KWON J H, CHOI O, LEE Y, et al.. Anthracnose on postharvest avocado caused by Colletotrichum kahawae subsp. ciggaro in South Korea [J]. Can. J. Plant Pathol., 2020, 42(4):508-513. |
10 | WANJIKU E K, WACEKE J W, WANJALA B W, et al.. Identification and pathogenicity of fungal pathogens associated with stem end rots of avocado fruits in Kenya [J/OL]. Int. J. Microbiol., 2020:4063697 [2023-08-10]. . |
11 | DAMM U, SATO T, ALIZADEH A, et al.. The Colletotrichum dracaenophilum, C. magnum and C. orchidearum species complexes [J]. Studys Mycol., 2019, 92(5):1-46. |
12 | TALHINHAS P, MOTA-CAPITAO C, MARTINS S, et al.. Epidemiology, histopathology and aetiology of olive anthracnose caused by Colletotrichum acutatum and C. gloeosporioides in Portugal [J]. Plant Pathol. 2011, 60(3):483-495. |
13 | 景春华.油梨果实贮藏及加工工艺研究进展[J].果树资源学报,2020,1(3):61-64. |
JING C H. Research progress on storage and processing technique of avocado [J]. J. Fruit Res., 2020,1(3):61-64. | |
14 | 李敏,胡美姣,高兆银,等.鳄梨果实病害及防治方法[J].中国南方果树,2009,38(5):71-73. |
15 | MARIN-FELIX Y, GROENEWALD J Z, CAI L, et al.. Genera of phytopathogenic fungi: GOPHY 1 [J]. Stu. Mycol., 2017,86:99-216. |
16 | 江涛,刘先宝,李博勋,等.国内橡胶树尖孢炭疽复合种种间分子系统发育及生物学特性分析[J].热带作物学报, 2020,41(9):1856-1864. |
JIANG T, LIU X B, LI B X, et al.. Interspecific molecular phylogeny and biological characteristics of Colletotrichum acutatum complex species causing Colletotrichum leaf disease on rubber trees in China [J]. Chin. J. Trop. Crops, 2020, 41(9):1856-1864. | |
17 | TALHINHAS P, BARONCELLI R. Colletotrichum species and complexes: geographic distribution, host range and conservation status [J]. Fungal Divers., 2021, 110: 109-198. |
18 | JAYAWARDENA R S, BHUNJUN C S, HYDE K D, et al.. Colletotrichum: lifestyles, biology, morpho-species, species complexes and accepted species [J]. Mycosphere, 2021, 12:519-699. |
19 | FUENTES-ARAGON D, SILVA-ROJAS H V, GUARNACCIA V, et al.. Colletotrichum species causing anthracnose on avocado fruit in Mexico: current status [J]. Plant Pathol., 2021, 69(8):1513-1528. |
20 | SHARMA G, MAYMON M and FREEMAN S. Epidemiology, pathology and identification of Colletotrichum including a novel species associated with avocado (Persea americana) anthracnose in Israel [J]. Sci. Rep., 2017, 7(1):1-16. |
21 | DAMM U, CANNON P F, WOUDENBERG J H C, et al.. The Colletotrichum acutatum species complex [J]. Studys Mycol., 2012, 73(1):37-113. |
22 | LIU F, CAI L, CROUS P W, et al.. The Colletotrichum gigasporum species complex [J]. Persoonia-Biol. Environ. Sci., 2014, 33(1):83-97. |
23 | LI M, FENG W L, YANG J Y, et al.. First report of anthracnose caused by Colletotrichum siamense on avocado fruits in China [J/OL]. Crop Prot., 2022, 155:105922 [2023-08-10]. . |
24 | 范真真,卢艳春,王文林,等.广西崇左油梨叶部炭疽病病原菌分离与鉴定[J].植物病理学报,2023,53(3):527-530. |
FAN Z Z, LU Y C, WANG W L, et al.. Identification of pathogen species of avocado leaf anthracnose in Chongzuo, Guangxi [J]. Acta Phytopathol. Sin., 2023, 53(3):527-530. | |
25 | 李晶,仇芳,张超,等.海南白沙和儋州油梨叶部及果实炭疽病菌的鉴定[J].果树学报,2023,40(7):1443-1454. |
LI J, QIU F, ZHANG C, et al.. Identification of pathogen species of avocado leaf and fruits anthracnose in Baisha and Danzhou, Hainan [J]. J. Fruit Sci., 2023,40(7):1443-1454. | |
26 | SHIVAS R G, TAN Y P, EDWARDS J, et al.. Colletotrichum species in Australia [J]. Aust. Plant Pathol., 2016, 45:447-464. |
27 | SOARES M G O, ALVES E, SILVEIRA A L, et al.. Colletotrichum siamense is the main aetiological agent of anthracnose of avocado in south-eastern Brazil [J]. Plant Pathol., 2021, 70(1):154-166. |
28 | ECKERT J W. Recent developments in the chemical control of postharvest diseases [J]. Acta Hortic., 1990, 269:477-494. |
29 | SCHEEPERS S, JOOSTE A, ALEMU Z G. Quantifying the impact of phytosanitry standards with specific reference to MRLs on the trade flow of South African avocados to the EU [J]. Agrekon, 2007, 46(2):260-273. |
30 | EVERETT K R, PAK H A, PUSHARAJAH I P S, et al. Field evaluation of fungicides to control postharvest rots of avocados in New Zealand [J]. New Zealand Plant Prot., 2011, 64:112-118. |
31 | SMITH L A, DANN B E K, LEONARDI J, et al.. Exploring on traditional products for management of postharvest anthracnose and stem end rot in avocado [C]// Proceedings of V11 World Avocado Congress Home page, 2011. |
32 | 韦文添.不同杀菌剂对油梨炭疽病菌的抑菌效果[J].贵州农业科学,2014,42(5):125-127. |
WEI W T. Antibacterial effect of different fungicides on avocado anthracnose [J]. Guizhou Agric. Sci., 2014, 42(5):125-127. |
[1] | 熊晓菲, 王秀琴, 庄翠珍, 郭家贤, 谢新锐, 吴建伟, 李奇峰. 基于ROI融合特征的柑橘炭疽病诊断方法[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2024, 26(9): 83-92. |
[2] | 贺春萍, 樊兰艳, 吴贺, 梁艳琼, 吴伟怀, 李锐, 郑服丛. 枯草芽孢杆菌Czk1脂肽物质对橡胶树炭疽病和白粉病的抑制效果研究[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2023, 25(6): 126-134. |
[3] | 罗立娜1,韩树全1*,王代谷1,李茂富2,马蔚红3,张正学1,刘小翠1. 油梨果实品质的差异分析与评价[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2021, 23(3): 105-113. |
[4] | 王薇,李泳,王伟,边雪,李熙英*. Y-S-Y12发酵液和生物质热解液混配对辣椒炭疽病的防治及作用机理[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2020, 22(10): 129-138. |
[5] | 吕宁*,王祺*,宋娟,张一名,周洪友. 甜瓜采后病害生防菌遗传改良及其相关性状初步分析[J]. , 2011, 13(2): 25-30. |
阅读次数 | ||||||
全文 |
|
|||||
摘要 |
|
|||||