不同水肥管理模式对烤烟养分积累及烟叶品质的影响

doi:10.13304/j.nykjdb.2021.0182

中国农业科技导报 ›› 2021, Vol. 23 ›› Issue (9): 193-201.DOI: 10.13304/j.nykjdb.2021.0182

• 生物制造资源生态 • 上一篇

不同水肥管理模式对烤烟养分积累及烟叶品质的影响

柳渊博1,王静1,朱学杰2,蒋伟峰1,刘天1,张锦中2,李耀鑫1,符云鹏1*

1.河南农业大学烟草学院, 郑州 450002； 2.河南省烟草公司周口市公司, 河南周口 466000

收稿日期:2021-03-03 接受日期:2021-05-24 出版日期:2021-09-15 发布日期:2021-09-10
通讯作者: 符云鹏 E-mail：yunpengfu@henau.edu.cn
作者简介:柳渊博 E-mail：ybliu1011@163.com
基金资助:
河南省烟草公司周口市公司科技项目（201741160024084）

Effects of Different Water and Fertilizer Management Modes on Nutrient Accumulation and Quality of Flue-cured Tobacco Leaves

LIU Yuanbo1, WANG Jing1, Zhu Xuejie2, JIANG Weifeng1, LIU Tian1, ZHANG Jinzhong2, LI Yaoxin1, FU Yunpeng1*#br#

#br#

1.College of Tobacco Science, Henan Agricultural University, Zhengzhou 450002, China; 2.Zhoukou Branch of Henan Province Tobacco Company, Henan Zhoukou 466000, China

Received:2021-03-03 Accepted:2021-05-24 Online:2021-09-15 Published:2021-09-10

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 为探究适合河南烟区应用的水肥管理模式，促进烟株对养分的吸收，提高烟叶产量和品质，以中烟100为试验材料，通过大田试验，比较常规水肥管理模式（CK）、常规施肥+滴灌（T1）、优化施肥+滴灌（T2）三种管理模式下烤烟叶片生物学产量、烟叶三要素含量及积累量、烤后烟叶经济性状和品质性状的差异。结果表明，与CK相比，T1处理烤烟叶片生物量提高了21.59%，烟叶N、P和K的积累量分别提高9.56%、54.78%和30.52%，烟叶产量、产值和上等烟比例分别提高6.45%、8.04%和30.48%；T2处理烤烟叶片生物量提高了33.36%，烟叶N、P、K的积累量分别提高了12.24%、98.75%、83.47%，烟叶产量、产值和上等烟比例分别提高了9.68%、15.05%、42.79%。T1和T2处理烤后烟叶的总糖、还原糖含量及糖碱比显著高于CK，烟叶氯含量显著降低，钾含量和钾氯比显著提高，烟叶的燃烧性均明显改善，感官质量提高，其中，T2处理烟叶化学成分协调性更好，其中部叶的香气、舒适度、甜度、杂气及刺激性分值及上部叶的香气、甜度、杂气分值明显高于CK。由此可见，优化施肥+滴灌模式适宜在河南省烟区推广应用，为河南烟区烟叶优质丰产的水肥管理模式奠定了科学依据。

关键词: 烤烟, 水肥管理模式, 养分积累, 化学成分, 感官质量

Abstract: To explore the suitable water and fertilizer management model for Henan tobacco areas, promote the nutrient uptake of tobacco plants and improve the yield and quality of tobacco leaves, Zhongyan 100 was as experimental material, and the field experiment was conducted to compare the differences of biological yield, content and accumulation of three elements of tobacco leaves, economic traits and quality traits of flue-cured tobacco leaves under three management modes including conventional water and fertilizer management (CK), conventional fertilization combined with drip irrigation (T1) and optimized fertilization combined with drip irrigation (T2). The results showed that, compared with CK, the leaf biomass of flue-cured tobacco treated with T1 increased by 2159%; the accumulations of N, P and K of tobacco leaves increased by 9.56%, 54.78% and 30.52%, respectively; and the yield, production value and the proportion of superior tobacco increased by 6.45%, 8.04% and 30.48%, respectively. The leaf biomass of tobacco plants in T2 treatment increased by 33.36%; the accumulation of N, P and K in tobacco leaves increased by 12.24%, 98.75% and 83.47%, respectively; and the yield, production value and proportion of top grade tobacco increased by 9.68%, 15.05% and 42.79%, respectively. In T1 and T2 treatments, the contents of total sugar, reducing sugar and sugar-alkali ratio of flue-cured tobacco leaves were significantly higher than those in CK, the chlorine content of the tobacco leaves decreased significantly, while the potassium content and potassium-chlorine ratio significantly increased, and the combustibility and sensory quality of tobacco leaves improved significantly. Among three treatments, T2 treatment had better coordination of chemical components in tobacco leave, and the scores of aroma, comfort, sweetness, miscellaneous gas and irritation in the middle and the upper leaves were significantly higher than those in CK. Therefore, the optimized fertilization combined with drip irrigation mode (T2) was suitable for popularization and application in Henan Province, which provided a scientific basis for the water and fertilizer management mode of high yield and good quality in tobacco-growing areas of Henan Province.

Key words: flue-cured tobacco, water and fertilizer managements, nutrients accumulation, chemical composition, sensory quality

中图分类号:

S572

柳渊博, 王静, 朱学杰, 蒋伟峰, 刘天, 张锦中, 李耀鑫, 符云鹏. 不同水肥管理模式对烤烟养分积累及烟叶品质的影响[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2021, 23(9): 193-201.

LIU Yuanbo, WANG Jing, Zhu Xuejie, JIANG Weifeng, LIU Tian, ZHANG Jinzhong, LI Yaoxin, FU Yunpeng. Effects of Different Water and Fertilizer Management Modes on Nutrient Accumulation and Quality of Flue-cured Tobacco Leaves[J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2021, 23(9): 193-201.

[1]	刘博远1,赵松超1,李一凡2,贺凡3,阳苇丽4,赵铭钦1*. 不同成熟度雪茄烟晾制过程碳水化合物及相关酶活性变化规律研究[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2021, 23(4): 192-201.
[2]	范宁波1,周俊学2,江凯2,王宏2,史龙飞2,高玉龙3,陈颐3. 不同成熟期烤烟主脉中膜脂过氧化及其与衰老相关基因的关系探究[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2021, 23(3): 66-72.
[3]	保志娟,金蓉,杨金清,张琦,朱永立,赵正雄*. Pb、Zn复合作用对烤烟抗氧化酶及碳氮代谢的影响[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2021, 23(2): 65-72.
[4]	杨成翠1,徐照丽2,史普酉1,贾孟1,白羽祥1,朱宣全1,程亚东1,杨焕文1,王戈*. 氮肥运筹对烤烟养分积累和产质量的影响[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2020, 22(6): 176-185.
[5]	赵松超1,田培1,刘博远1,李一凡2,赵铭钦1*. 采收成熟度对雪茄烟叶晾制过程酶促棕色化反应及品质的影响[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2020, 22(5): 51-59.
[6]	刘勇1,李立新1,吴金富2,赵树德2,何宽信1*. 多雨烟区倚靠式散叶装烟烘烤工艺对烟叶质量的影响[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2020, 22(4): 162-170.
[7]	刘扣珠1,高真真1,夏素素1,李建华2,顿松阳2,李洪亮2,王京2,段卫东3,史宏志1*. 基于产值和感官指标的豫中“上六片”烟叶栽培措施优化[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2020, 22(2): 158-165.
[8]	杨明坤1,李建华2,刘扣珠1,顿松阳2,李洪亮2,王典2,史宏志1*. 豫中上六片烤烟不同采收期对烤后烟叶品质的影响[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2020, 22(12): 163-171.
[9]	郑小雨1,李常军2,路晓崇1,王刚3,赵俊杰2,李云平2,彭玖华2,杨超1,2*. 烤烟不同成熟期色素含量变化及其与叶绿体超微结构的关系探究[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2020, 22(10): 60-68.
[10]	吕大树1,李子绅2,郭泽2,张亚恒1,夏阳3,杨雨波1,徐玮1,陈向东1,王英锋2,张力元1,代晓燕2*. 分次施用钾肥及配套措施对烤烟生长发育及其产质量的影响[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2020, 22(1): 116-123.
[11]	景宇鹏1,2,段玉1*,张君1,牛洁3,张三粉1,李秀萍1,栗燕芳1,莎娜1. 播期对阴山北麓干旱半干旱区华油杂62生长及养分吸收的影响[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2019, 21(9): 111-116.
[12]	李海朝1,黄丽娟1,孙慧珍2*. 狼毒根原料特点及其中柱制备糠醛研究[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2019, 21(9): 137-142.
[13]	代快1,李江舟1*,蒲天燕1,计思贵1,张立猛1,张璐2,段淑辉3,孟军4,张翠萍1,樊苗苗5. 施用生物炭对3种烟用农药残留的影响[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2019, 21(8): 99-106.
[14]	刘超1,武云杰1,张安乾1,贺文俊1,张思琦1,陈芳1,何佳1,周方1,杨铁钊1,叶红朝2*. 外源GA3和IAA对烤烟内源激素调控效应和常规化学成分的影响[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2019, 21(8): 153-160.
[15]	赵松超1,赵喆1,李一凡1,饶东明2,秦言敏2,冯小虎2,张友武2,赵铭钦1*. 植烟密度对烤烟“高温逼熟”现象的影响[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2019, 21(7): 145-154.

不同水肥管理模式对烤烟养分积累及烟叶品质的影响

Effects of Different Water and Fertilizer Management Modes on Nutrient Accumulation and Quality of Flue-cured Tobacco Leaves

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics