Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology ›› 2022, Vol. 24 ›› Issue (8): 172-181.DOI: 10.13304/j.nykjdb.2021.0122
• BIO-MANUFACTURING & RESOURCE AND ECOLOGY • Previous Articles
Ling LI1(), Helin DONG2, Pengcheng LI2(
), Liwen TIAN3, Chunmei LI1, Yunzhen MA1, Na ZHANG1, Fang WANG1, Wenxiu XU1(
)
Received:
2021-02-02
Accepted:
2021-04-15
Online:
2022-08-15
Published:
2022-08-22
Contact:
Pengcheng LI,Wenxiu XU
李玲1(), 董合林2, 李鹏程2(
), 田立文3, 李春梅1, 马云珍1, 张娜1, 王芳1, 徐文修1(
)
通讯作者:
李鹏程,徐文修
作者简介:
李玲 E-mail:xjnydxll@126.com
基金资助:
CLC Number:
Ling LI, Helin DONG, Pengcheng LI, Liwen TIAN, Chunmei LI, Yunzhen MA, Na ZHANG, Fang WANG, Wenxiu XU. Effects of Machine Harvesting Planting Methods on Photosynthetic Characteristics and Dry Matter Accumulation of Different Plant Types of Cotton[J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2022, 24(8): 172-181.
李玲, 董合林, 李鹏程, 田立文, 李春梅, 马云珍, 张娜, 王芳, 徐文修. 机采棉种植方式对不同株型棉花光合特性及干物质积累的影响[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2022, 24(8): 172-181.
年份 Year | 品种(系) Variety(line) | 种植方式 Planting pattern | 株高 Plant height/cm | 果枝始节高度 First fruit branch height/cm | 果枝始 节位 First fruit node | 平均节间长 Average internode length/cm | 平均果枝长 Average fruit branch length/cm | 果枝数 Fruit branch numbers |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2019 | 中棉所96A ZMS96A | R3 | 85.98 a | 25.95 a | 6.50 a | 5.66 a | 19.68 a | 10.80 a |
R4 | 82.96 ab | 24.78 ab | 6.70 a | 5.24 b | 19.36 a | 9.80 ab | ||
R6 | 80.49 b | 23.84 bc | 6.60 a | 5.38 b | 18.26 b | 9.20 b | ||
B9 | R3 | 82.85 ab | 22.72 c | 5.50 b | 5.70 a | 11.81 c | 10.00 ab | |
R4 | 83.75 ab | 20.98 d | 5.50 b | 5.66 a | 10.84 d | 9.70 ab | ||
R6 | 81.95 b | 20.53 d | 5.40 b | 5.32 b | 10.94 d | 10.20 ab | ||
2020 | 中棉所96A ZMS96A | R3 | 78.50 a | 21.00 a | 6.50 a | 4.74 a | 18.90 a | 11.70 a |
R4 | 63.83 c | 19.94 ab | 6.70 a | 4.20 b | 16.40 b | 10.70 a | ||
R6 | 63.83 c | 20.75 ab | 6.70 ab | 4.21 b | 15.31 b | 10.80 a | ||
B9 | R3 | 69.17 b | 19.13 bc | 5.70 bc | 4.38 ab | 11.11 c | 11.00 a | |
R4 | 65.83 bc | 17.50 c | 5.30 c | 4.29 b | 7.49 d | 10.70 a | ||
R6 | 63.34 c | 15.00 d | 5.50 c | 4.04 b | 7.98 d | 10.50 a | ||
变异来源Source of variation | ||||||||
年份 Year | ** | ** | ns | ** | ** | ** | ||
品种(系)Variety(line) | ns | ** | ** | ns | ** | ns | ||
种植方式Planting pattern | ** | ** | ns | * | ** | * | ||
品种(系)×种植方式 Variety(line)×planting pattern | * | ns | ns | ns | ns | ns |
Table 1 Effects of planting patterns on morphological indexes of different plant types of cotton
年份 Year | 品种(系) Variety(line) | 种植方式 Planting pattern | 株高 Plant height/cm | 果枝始节高度 First fruit branch height/cm | 果枝始 节位 First fruit node | 平均节间长 Average internode length/cm | 平均果枝长 Average fruit branch length/cm | 果枝数 Fruit branch numbers |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2019 | 中棉所96A ZMS96A | R3 | 85.98 a | 25.95 a | 6.50 a | 5.66 a | 19.68 a | 10.80 a |
R4 | 82.96 ab | 24.78 ab | 6.70 a | 5.24 b | 19.36 a | 9.80 ab | ||
R6 | 80.49 b | 23.84 bc | 6.60 a | 5.38 b | 18.26 b | 9.20 b | ||
B9 | R3 | 82.85 ab | 22.72 c | 5.50 b | 5.70 a | 11.81 c | 10.00 ab | |
R4 | 83.75 ab | 20.98 d | 5.50 b | 5.66 a | 10.84 d | 9.70 ab | ||
R6 | 81.95 b | 20.53 d | 5.40 b | 5.32 b | 10.94 d | 10.20 ab | ||
2020 | 中棉所96A ZMS96A | R3 | 78.50 a | 21.00 a | 6.50 a | 4.74 a | 18.90 a | 11.70 a |
R4 | 63.83 c | 19.94 ab | 6.70 a | 4.20 b | 16.40 b | 10.70 a | ||
R6 | 63.83 c | 20.75 ab | 6.70 ab | 4.21 b | 15.31 b | 10.80 a | ||
B9 | R3 | 69.17 b | 19.13 bc | 5.70 bc | 4.38 ab | 11.11 c | 11.00 a | |
R4 | 65.83 bc | 17.50 c | 5.30 c | 4.29 b | 7.49 d | 10.70 a | ||
R6 | 63.34 c | 15.00 d | 5.50 c | 4.04 b | 7.98 d | 10.50 a | ||
变异来源Source of variation | ||||||||
年份 Year | ** | ** | ns | ** | ** | ** | ||
品种(系)Variety(line) | ns | ** | ** | ns | ** | ns | ||
种植方式Planting pattern | ** | ** | ns | * | ** | * | ||
品种(系)×种植方式 Variety(line)×planting pattern | * | ns | ns | ns | ns | ns |
年份 Year | 品种(系) Variety(line) | 种植方式 Planting pattern | 现蕾期 Budding stage | 盛蕾期 Full bud stage | 盛花期 Blooming stage | 盛铃前期 Prophase of full boll stage | 盛铃后期 Anaphase of full boll stage |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2019 | 中棉所96A ZMS96A | R3 | 36.64 ab | 39.90 a | 40.43 a | 25.00 b | 14.03 ab |
R4 | 37.27 a | 39.27 ab | 37.40 b | 22.70 c | 14.20 ab | ||
R6 | 34.97 c | 40.07 a | 38.60 ab | 22.95 c | 14.65 ab | ||
B9 | R3 | 35.45 bc | 38.35 b | 36.87 b | 27.82 a | 11.80 b | |
R4 | 34.50 c | 38.80 ab | 36.74 b | 26.08 b | 14.83 ab | ||
R6 | 35.50 bc | 39.42 ab | 39.47 ab | 28.57 a | 16.75 a | ||
2020 | 中棉所96A ZMS96A | R3 | 32.07 a | 38.53 a | 34.60 ab | 35.63 a | — |
R4 | 31.33 a | 37.20 ab | 33.15 c | 34.02 ab | — | ||
R6 | 32.17 a | 38.13 ab | 34.90 a | 34.45 ab | — | ||
B9 | R3 | 32.87 a | 35.78 b | 34.60 ab | 34.35 ab | — | |
R4 | 32.17 a | 37.60 ab | 33.85 bc | 33.27 b | — | ||
R6 | 32.45 a | 38.18 ab | 34.73 a | 35.65 a | — |
Table 2 Net photosynthetic rate of different plant types of cotton of different plant types from 2019 to 2020
年份 Year | 品种(系) Variety(line) | 种植方式 Planting pattern | 现蕾期 Budding stage | 盛蕾期 Full bud stage | 盛花期 Blooming stage | 盛铃前期 Prophase of full boll stage | 盛铃后期 Anaphase of full boll stage |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2019 | 中棉所96A ZMS96A | R3 | 36.64 ab | 39.90 a | 40.43 a | 25.00 b | 14.03 ab |
R4 | 37.27 a | 39.27 ab | 37.40 b | 22.70 c | 14.20 ab | ||
R6 | 34.97 c | 40.07 a | 38.60 ab | 22.95 c | 14.65 ab | ||
B9 | R3 | 35.45 bc | 38.35 b | 36.87 b | 27.82 a | 11.80 b | |
R4 | 34.50 c | 38.80 ab | 36.74 b | 26.08 b | 14.83 ab | ||
R6 | 35.50 bc | 39.42 ab | 39.47 ab | 28.57 a | 16.75 a | ||
2020 | 中棉所96A ZMS96A | R3 | 32.07 a | 38.53 a | 34.60 ab | 35.63 a | — |
R4 | 31.33 a | 37.20 ab | 33.15 c | 34.02 ab | — | ||
R6 | 32.17 a | 38.13 ab | 34.90 a | 34.45 ab | — | ||
B9 | R3 | 32.87 a | 35.78 b | 34.60 ab | 34.35 ab | — | |
R4 | 32.17 a | 37.60 ab | 33.85 bc | 33.27 b | — | ||
R6 | 32.45 a | 38.18 ab | 34.73 a | 35.65 a | — |
品种(系) Variety(line) | 种植方式 Planting pattern | Ym/(g·plant-1) | t1/d | t2/d | Δt/d | tm/d | Vm/ (g·plant-1·d-1) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ZMS96A | R3 | 99.34 | 65.08 | 112.67 | 47.59 | 88.94 | 1.51 |
R4 | 98.96 | 71.63 | 122.47 | 50.84 | 97.12 | 1.51 | |
R6 | 99.37 | 71.18 | 122.04 | 50.87 | 96.68 | 1.51 | |
B9 | R3 | 94.82 | 63.63 | 110.83 | 47.20 | 87.29 | 1.44 |
R4 | 95.02 | 65.21 | 109.43 | 44.22 | 87.38 | 1.52 | |
R6 | 98.89 | 62.97 | 104.35 | 41.38 | 83.71 | 1.65 |
Table 3 Eigen values of dry matter accumulation in different plant types of cotton in 2019
品种(系) Variety(line) | 种植方式 Planting pattern | Ym/(g·plant-1) | t1/d | t2/d | Δt/d | tm/d | Vm/ (g·plant-1·d-1) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ZMS96A | R3 | 99.34 | 65.08 | 112.67 | 47.59 | 88.94 | 1.51 |
R4 | 98.96 | 71.63 | 122.47 | 50.84 | 97.12 | 1.51 | |
R6 | 99.37 | 71.18 | 122.04 | 50.87 | 96.68 | 1.51 | |
B9 | R3 | 94.82 | 63.63 | 110.83 | 47.20 | 87.29 | 1.44 |
R4 | 95.02 | 65.21 | 109.43 | 44.22 | 87.38 | 1.52 | |
R6 | 98.89 | 62.97 | 104.35 | 41.38 | 83.71 | 1.65 |
品种(系) Variety(line) | 种植方式 Planting pattern | Ym/(g·plant-1) | t1/d | t2/d | Δt/d | tm/d | Vm/ (g·plant-1·d-1) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
中棉所96A ZMS96A | R3 | 41.56 | 48.67 | 73.71 | 25.04 | 61.23 | 1.09 |
R4 | 41.06 | 49.79 | 82.47 | 32.68 | 66.17 | 0.83 | |
R6 | 38.91 | 46.80 | 80.32 | 33.52 | 63.61 | 0.76 | |
B9 | R3 | 38.19 | 47.38 | 69.44 | 22.05 | 58.44 | 1.14 |
R4 | 37.05 | 47.16 | 72.66 | 25.50 | 59.94 | 0.95 | |
R6 | 40.18 | 48.22 | 70.10 | 21.87 | 59.19 | 1.21 |
Table 4 Eigen values of dry matter accumulation in vegetative organs of cotton of different plant types in 2019
品种(系) Variety(line) | 种植方式 Planting pattern | Ym/(g·plant-1) | t1/d | t2/d | Δt/d | tm/d | Vm/ (g·plant-1·d-1) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
中棉所96A ZMS96A | R3 | 41.56 | 48.67 | 73.71 | 25.04 | 61.23 | 1.09 |
R4 | 41.06 | 49.79 | 82.47 | 32.68 | 66.17 | 0.83 | |
R6 | 38.91 | 46.80 | 80.32 | 33.52 | 63.61 | 0.76 | |
B9 | R3 | 38.19 | 47.38 | 69.44 | 22.05 | 58.44 | 1.14 |
R4 | 37.05 | 47.16 | 72.66 | 25.50 | 59.94 | 0.95 | |
R6 | 40.18 | 48.22 | 70.10 | 21.87 | 59.19 | 1.21 |
品种(系) Variety(line) | 种植方式 Planting pattern | Ym/(g·plant-1) | t1/d | t2/d | Δt/d | tm/d | Vm/ (g·plant-1·d-1) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
中棉所96A ZMS96A | R3 | 62.31 | 91.21 | 126.19 | 34.98 | 108.75 | 1.41 |
R4 | 60.09 | 92.82 | 122.22 | 29.40 | 107.56 | 1.52 | |
R6 | 61.04 | 92.02 | 121.52 | 29.50 | 106.81 | 1.53 | |
B9 | R3 | 57.84 | 88.83 | 114.65 | 25.82 | 101.78 | 1.55 |
R4 | 60.22 | 88.08 | 113.80 | 25.72 | 100.98 | 1.62 | |
R6 | 62.77 | 86.81 | 114.60 | 27.79 | 100.74 | 1.58 |
Table 5 Eigen values of dry matter accumulation in genital organs of cotton of different plant types in 2019
品种(系) Variety(line) | 种植方式 Planting pattern | Ym/(g·plant-1) | t1/d | t2/d | Δt/d | tm/d | Vm/ (g·plant-1·d-1) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
中棉所96A ZMS96A | R3 | 62.31 | 91.21 | 126.19 | 34.98 | 108.75 | 1.41 |
R4 | 60.09 | 92.82 | 122.22 | 29.40 | 107.56 | 1.52 | |
R6 | 61.04 | 92.02 | 121.52 | 29.50 | 106.81 | 1.53 | |
B9 | R3 | 57.84 | 88.83 | 114.65 | 25.82 | 101.78 | 1.55 |
R4 | 60.22 | 88.08 | 113.80 | 25.72 | 100.98 | 1.62 | |
R6 | 62.77 | 86.81 | 114.60 | 27.79 | 100.74 | 1.58 |
年份 Year | 品种(系) Variety(line) | 种植方式 Planting pattern | 收获株数 Harvested plants/(104 plant·hm-2) | 单株铃数 Boll No. per plant | 单铃重 Single boll weight/g | 籽棉产量 Seed cotton yield/(kg·hm-2) | 衣分 Lint percentage/% |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2019 | 中棉所96A ZMS96A | R3 | 18.20 a | 7.67 a | 5.42 a | 5 356.99 a | 44.58 b |
R4 | 18.12 a | 7.13 bc | 5.49 a | 5 191.18 ab | 45.07 ab | ||
R6 | 18.20 a | 6.50 d | 5.41 a | 5 134.61 b | 44.98 ab | ||
B9 | R3 | 18.09 a | 7.23 b | 5.38 a | 4 038.50 d | 45.60 a | |
R4 | 18.20 a | 7.00 c | 5.12 b | 3 812.91 d | 45.23 ab | ||
R6 | 18.35 a | 7.30 b | 5.63 a | 4 576.97 c | 45.65 a | ||
2020 | 中棉所96A ZMS96A | R3 | 18.22 a | 7.33 a | 5.43 a | 4 929.59 a | 45.83 c |
R4 | 18.47 a | 6.56 bc | 5.11 b | 4 628.07 b | 46.47 abc | ||
R6 | 18.13 a | 6.33 c | 5.24 ab | 4 503.66 b | 46.76 ab | ||
B9 | R3 | 18.22 a | 6.89 abc | 5.10 b | 3 983.57 d | 46.52 abc | |
R4 | 18.02 a | 6.78 abc | 5.03 b | 3 982.65 d | 47.14 a | ||
R6 | 18.12 a | 7.22 ab | 5.06 b | 4 166.82 c | 46.12 bc | ||
变异来源Source of variation | |||||||
年份 Year | ns | ns | ** | ** | ** | ||
品种(系)Variety(line) | ns | ns | ** | ** | ns | ||
种植方式Planting pattern | ns | ** | * | ** | ns | ||
品种(系)×种植方式 Variety(line)×planting pattern | ns | ** | ns | ** | ns |
Table 6 The yield and yield components of different plant types of cotton
年份 Year | 品种(系) Variety(line) | 种植方式 Planting pattern | 收获株数 Harvested plants/(104 plant·hm-2) | 单株铃数 Boll No. per plant | 单铃重 Single boll weight/g | 籽棉产量 Seed cotton yield/(kg·hm-2) | 衣分 Lint percentage/% |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2019 | 中棉所96A ZMS96A | R3 | 18.20 a | 7.67 a | 5.42 a | 5 356.99 a | 44.58 b |
R4 | 18.12 a | 7.13 bc | 5.49 a | 5 191.18 ab | 45.07 ab | ||
R6 | 18.20 a | 6.50 d | 5.41 a | 5 134.61 b | 44.98 ab | ||
B9 | R3 | 18.09 a | 7.23 b | 5.38 a | 4 038.50 d | 45.60 a | |
R4 | 18.20 a | 7.00 c | 5.12 b | 3 812.91 d | 45.23 ab | ||
R6 | 18.35 a | 7.30 b | 5.63 a | 4 576.97 c | 45.65 a | ||
2020 | 中棉所96A ZMS96A | R3 | 18.22 a | 7.33 a | 5.43 a | 4 929.59 a | 45.83 c |
R4 | 18.47 a | 6.56 bc | 5.11 b | 4 628.07 b | 46.47 abc | ||
R6 | 18.13 a | 6.33 c | 5.24 ab | 4 503.66 b | 46.76 ab | ||
B9 | R3 | 18.22 a | 6.89 abc | 5.10 b | 3 983.57 d | 46.52 abc | |
R4 | 18.02 a | 6.78 abc | 5.03 b | 3 982.65 d | 47.14 a | ||
R6 | 18.12 a | 7.22 ab | 5.06 b | 4 166.82 c | 46.12 bc | ||
变异来源Source of variation | |||||||
年份 Year | ns | ns | ** | ** | ** | ||
品种(系)Variety(line) | ns | ns | ** | ** | ns | ||
种植方式Planting pattern | ns | ** | * | ** | ns | ||
品种(系)×种植方式 Variety(line)×planting pattern | ns | ** | ns | ** | ns |
1 | 国家统计局.中国统计年鉴[M].北京:中国统计出版社, 2020:1-935. |
2 | 梁亚军,李雪源,郑巨云,等.新疆2019年棉花产业情况概述及存在问题与策略[J].棉花科学,2020,42(1):14-20. |
LIANG Y J, LI X Y, ZHENG J Y, et al.. Overview of cotton industry situation and existing problems and strategies in Xinjiang in 2019 [J]. Cott. Sci., 2020, 42 (1):14-20. | |
3 | 曹阳,严玉萍,冯振秀,等.北疆机采棉脱叶环节存在问题及改善途径[J].中国棉花,2012,39(11): 6-7. |
CAO Y, YAN Y P, FENG Z X, et al.. Defoliation related problems and improvement methods of machine-picked cotton in northern Xinjiang [J]. China Cott., 2012, 39(11):6-7. | |
4 | 余渝,孔宪辉,刘丽,等.新疆兵团机采棉发展现状与建议[J].塔里木大学学报,2018,30(3):57-61. |
YU Y, KONG X H, LIU L, et al.. Development status and suggestions of mechanical harvest upland cotton in Xinjiang production and construction corps [J]. J. Tarim Univ., 2018, 30(3): 57-61. | |
5 | 蔡晓莉,曾庆涛,刘铨义,等.机采杂交棉等行距高产机理初探[J].新疆农垦科技,2014,37(11):3-5. |
6 | 肖继兵,刘志,孔凡信,等.种植方式和密度对高粱群体结构和产量的影响[J].中国农业科学,2018,51(22):4264-4276. |
XIAO J B, LIU Z, KONG F X, et al.. Effects of planting pattern and density on population structure and yield of sorghum [J]. Sci. Agric. Sin., 2018, 51(22):4264-4276. | |
7 | 郭仁松,林涛,崔建平,等.配置模式对枣棉间作棉花光合及干物质积累特征的影响[J].干旱地区农业研究,2013,31(6):34-38, 43. |
GUO R S, LIN T, CUI J P, et al.. Influence of allocation models on characteristics of photosynthesis and dry matter accumulation in cotton intercropped with jujube [J]. Agric. Res. Arid Areas, 2013, 31(6):34-38, 43. | |
8 | 陈传信,唐江华,陈佳君,等.种植方式对夏大豆鼓粒期叶片光合能力及籽粒灌浆特性的影响[J].干旱地区农业研究,2018,36(3):101-105. |
CHEN C X, TANG J H, CHEN J J, et al.. Effect of planting patterns on photosynthetic capacity and grain filling characteristics of summer soybean at seed-filling stage [J]. Agric. Res. Arid Areas, 2018, 36(3):101-105. | |
9 | 魏珊珊,王祥宇,董树亭.株行距配置对高产夏玉米冠层结构及籽粒灌浆特性的影响[J].应用生态学报,2014,25(2):441-450. |
WEI S S, WANG X Y, DONG S T. Effects of row spacing on canopy structure and grain-filling characteristics of high-yield summer maize [J]. Chin. J. Appl. Ecol., 2014, 25(2):441-450. | |
10 | 周永萍,杜海英,师树新,等.合理密植条件下种植模式对棉花生长结铃和产量的影响[J].内蒙古农业大学学报(自然科学版),2019,40(2):11-14. |
ZHOU Y P, DU H Y, SHI S X, et al.. Effects of planting modes on cotton growth, boll and yield under reasonable close planting [J]. J. Inner Mongolia Agric. Univ. (Nat. Sci.), 2019, 40(2):11-14. | |
11 | 张昊,林涛,尔晨,等.配置模式对南疆机采棉生长发育及产量形成的调控效应[J].新疆农业大学学报,2018,41(5):307-313. |
ZHANG H, LIN T, ER C, et al.. Effects of planting patterns on growth and yield formation for machine-picked cotton in southern Xinjiang [J]. J. Xinjiang Agric. Univ., 2018, 41(5):307-313. | |
12 | 辛明华,李小飞,韩迎春,等.不同行距配置对南疆机采棉生长发育及产量的影响[J].中国棉花,2020,47(2):13-17. |
XIN M H, LI X F, HAN Y C, et al.. Effects of different row spacing configurations on the growth and development and yield of machine-picked cotton in southern Xinjiang [J]. China Cott., 2020, 47(2):13-17. | |
13 | 张金城.阿克苏市5种棉花种植模式对比试验[J].新疆农机化,2018(1):31-33. |
ZHANG J C. Comparative test of five cotton planting modes in Akesu city [J]. Xinjiang Agric. Mech., 2018(1):31-33. | |
14 | 魏丽梅.棉花全程机械化种植模式对比试验[J].农村科技,2018(12):13-14. |
15 | 马锦颖,王方永,韩焕勇.种植模式对棉花农艺及产量和品质的影响[J].中国棉花,2019,46(6):28-30. |
MA J Y, WANG F Y, HAN H Y. Effect of planting patterns on cotton agronomy characters, yield and fiber quality [J]. China Cott., 2019, 46(6):28-30. | |
16 | 朱晓平,郑新疆,张静,等.新疆东部植棉区机采棉不同品种与株行距配置的比较[J].棉花科学,2019,41(2):20-22. |
ZHU X P, ZHENG X J, ZHANG J, et al.. Comparison of machine picked cotton varieties and plant row spacing in eastern Xinjiang [J]. Cott. Sci., 2019, 41(2):20-22. | |
17 | 梁亚军,罗天睿,郑巨云,等.不同机采棉配置冠层结构及产量性状差异研究[J].新疆农业科学,2017,54(6):1008-1013. |
LIANG Y J, LUO T R, ZHENG J Y, et al.. Research on the different colonial canopy architecture characters and yield characters of machine harvesting cotton under different field collocation patterns [J]. Xinjiang Agric. Sci., 2017, 54(6):1008-1013. | |
18 | 李建峰.机采模式下株行距配置对棉花冠层特征及成铃特性的影响[D].石河子:石河子大学, 2016. |
LI J F. Effect of plant and row spacing on canopy structure and boll setting of machine-picked cotton [D]. Shihezi: Shihezi University, 2016. | |
19 | 蔡晓莉,马丽娟,逯涛,等.不同种植模式和密度对Z1112产量及纤维品质的影响[J].中国棉花, 2018,45(6):24-26, 42. |
CAI X L, MA L J, LU T, et al.. Effects of different cultivation patterns and densities on yield and fiber quality of a cotton variety Z1112 [J]. China Cott., 2018, 45(6):24-26, 42. | |
20 | 阿不都卡地尔·库尔班,李健伟,杨培,等.机采棉株行距配置对棉花生物量和氮素累积分配及产量的影响[J].新疆农业科学,2018,55(8):1406-1416. |
KUERBAN A, LI J W, YANG P, et al.. Effect of row spacing of plant on biomass and nitrogen accumulation distribution and yield of cotton [J]. Xinjiang Agric. Sci., 2018, 55(8):1406-1416. | |
21 | 李健伟,肖绍伟,夏冬,等.机采种植模式对不同株型棉花生长及产量的影响[J].新疆农业大学学报,2017,40(6):391-396. |
LI J W, XIAO S W, XIA D, et al.. The effect of machine harvesting planting patterns on the growth and yield of cotton with different plant patterns [J]. J. Xinjiang Agric. Univ., 2017, 40(6):391-396. | |
22 | KHAN A, NAJEEB U, WANG L S, et al.. Planting density and sowing date strongly influence growth and lint yield of cotton crops [J]. Field Crops Res., 2017, 209:129-135. |
23 | 邓福军,林海,韩焕勇,等.北疆棉花合理密植技术及其机制[J].西北农业学报, 2011, 20(7):112-117. |
DENG F J, LIN H, HAN H Y, et al.. Technology and mechanism of rational close planting of cotton in north Xinjiang [J]. Acta Agric. Bor-Occid. Sin., 2011, 20(7):112-117. | |
24 | 支晓宇,韩迎春,王国平,等.不同密度下棉花群体光辐射空间分布及生物量和纤维品质的变化[J].棉花学报,2017,29(4):365-373. |
ZHI X Y, HAN Y C, WANG G P, et al.. Changes to the PAR spatial distribution, biomass, and fiber quality in response to pant densities [J]. Cott. Sci., 2017, 29(4):365-373. | |
25 | 王士红,杨中旭,史加亮,等.增密减氮对棉花干物质和氮素积累分配及产量的影响[J].作物学报,2020,46(3):395-407. |
WANG S H, YANG Z X, SHI J L, et al.. Effects of increasing planting density and decreasing nitrogen rate on dry matter,nitrogen accumulation and distribution, and yield of cotton [J]. Acta Agron. Sin., 2020,46(3):395-407. | |
26 | 李健伟,吴鹏昊,石洪亮,等.不同机采棉种植模式对棉花主要植株形态影响效应分析[J].干旱地区农业研究,2018,36(5):82-87, 93. |
LI J W, WU P H, SHI H L, et al.. Characteristics of plant morphological parameters and correlation analysis for machine picking cotton in the different planting models [J]. Agric. Res. Arid Areas, 2018, 36(5):82-87, 93. | |
27 | 杨培,陈振,阿不都卡地尔·库尔班,等.对等密度条件下机采棉不同种植模式的综合评价[J].新疆农业科学,2019,56(4):599-609. |
YANG P, CHEN Z, KUERBAN A, et al.. Comprehensive evaluation of different planting modes of machine-picked cotton under the equal density condition [J]. Xinjiang Agric. Sci., 2019, 56(4):599-609. | |
28 | 冯国艺,罗宏海,姚炎帝,等.新疆超高产棉花叶、铃空间分布及与群体光合生产的关系[J].中国农业科学,2012,45(13):2607-2617. |
FENG G Y, LUO H H, YAO Y D, et al.. Spatial distribution of leaf and boll in relation to canopy photosynthesis of super high-yielding cotton in Xinjiang [J]. Sci. Agric. Sin., 2012, 45(13):2607-2617. | |
29 | 冯国艺,姚炎帝,罗宏海,等.新疆超高产棉花冠层光分布特征及其与群体光合生产的关系[J].应用生态学报,2012,23(5):1286-1294. |
FENG G Y, YAO Y D, LUO H H, et al.. Canopy light distribution and its correlation with photosynthetic production in super-high yielding cotton fields of Xinjiang, northwest China [J]. Chin. J. Appl. Ecol., 2012, 23(5):1286-1294. | |
30 | 杜明伟,罗宏海,张亚黎,等.新疆超高产杂交棉的光合生产特征研究[J].中国农业科学,2009,42(6):1952-1962. |
DU M W, LUO H H, ZHANG Y L, et al.. Photosynthesis characteristics of super-high-yield hybrid cotton in Xinjiang [J]. Sci. Agric. Sin., 2009, 42(6):1952-1962. | |
31 | 白志刚.不同棉花品种基于冠层PAR空间分布的株型特征与生长发育的研究[D].北京:中国农业科学院, 2016. |
BAI Z G. Study on plant type characteristics and growth and development of different cotton varieties based on canopy par spatial distribution [D]. Beijing: Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, 2016. | |
32 | 徐新霞,雷建峰,高丽丽,等.不同机采棉行距配置对棉花生长发育及光合物质生产的影响[J].干旱地区农业研究,2017,35(2):51-56. |
XU X X, LEI J F, GAO L L, et al.. Effects of different row spacing patterns on growth and photosynthetic production of machine-harvested cotton [J]. Agric. Res. Arid Areas, 2017, 35(2):51-56. | |
33 | 刘兆新,刘婷如,刘妍,等.小麦行距配置对套种花生生理特性和产量的影响[J].应用生态学报,2018,29(6):1951-1959. |
LIU Z X, LIU T R, LIU Y, et al.. Effect of row spacing on physiological characteristics and yield of intercropped peanut with wheat [J]. Chin. J. App. Ecol., 2018, 29(6):1951-1959. |
[1] | ZHANG Te, KANG Zhenghua, ZHAO Qiang*, NIE Zhiyong, WANG Mifeng, CUI Yannan. Impacts of Nitrogen Application Rate and Topping Methods on Nutrient Accumulation, Distribution and Yield of Cotton#br# [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2021, 23(3): 139-147. |
[2] | ZHANG Quanyan, ZHANG Peigao, XU Chunxia, CONG Yining, LIU Li. Advances in Genetic Researches and Molecular Regulation Mechanism of Leaf Angle in Maize [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2021, 23(10): 15-24. |
[3] | HUANG Yaru1, MA Yingbin1, HAO Yuguang1*, ZHANG Jiaqi2, ZHANG Jianping1, LI Shuai1, MA Yuan1, ZHANG Ranhao1. Study on Leaf Trait of Poplar in Protection Forest at Ulan Buh Desert Oasis [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2020, 22(5): 42-50. |
[4] | ZHU Guolong, WANG Zhuan, LONG Huaiyu*, ZHANG Renlian, YU Kefan. Effect of Soil Moisture on Growth and Water Use Efficiency of Cherry Radish Under Negative Pressure Irrigation [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2020, 22(12): 127-136. |
[5] | WANG Zhuan, ZHU Guolong, LONG Huaiyu*, ZHANG Renlian, SHEN Zhe, QU Xiaolin, YU Kefan. Effects of Temporal Variation of Soil Moisture on the Growth and Water Use Efficiency of Maize [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2020, 22(11): 153-164. |
[6] | LIANG Yugang1, LI Jingyi1, WANG Dan2, YU Zhengjun1, HUANG Huang1*, CHEN Can1*. Impact of Rice-fish-chicken Ridge Cultivation on Rice Population Growth and Yield [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2020, 22(11): 165-175. |
[7] | JIANG Mingjin1, LI Min1*, ZHOU Weijia1, LUO Deqiang1, JIANG Xuehai1, JI Guangmei1, LI Lijiang1, XU Wenbo1, QIN Yuhe2. Screening and Evaluation of High-quality Indica Rice Cultivars Suitable for Mechanized Transplanting [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2020, 22(10): 27-37. |
[8] | CHEN Linan1,2, LIU Xiuchun1, RONG Chuansheng1, HAN Xiaori2, SUN Zhanxiang3*. Effect of Alternate Partial Root-zone Irrigation on Growth and Distribution of Dry Matter in Young Grape Tree [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2019, 21(5): 152-158. |
[9] | ZHANG Guanchu1,2, ZHANG Zhimeng1*, CI Dunwei1, DING Hong1, YANG Jishun1, SHI Xiaolong1,3, TIAN Jiaming1,3, DAI Liangxiang1* . Salt Tolerance of Different Peanut Varieties and Na+ Uptake Dynamic Characteristics [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2019, 21(2): 34-40. |
[10] | TANG Haiming, XIAO Xiaoping, TANG Wenguang, LI Chao, WANG Ke, CHENG Kaikai, GUO Lijun, SUN Geng. Effects of Covering Paddy Field by Crop Straw in Winter on Nutrition Accumulation and Translocation of Rice Plant [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2018, 20(8): 63-73. |
[11] | HAN Wei, YE Zupeng, FENG Lin, GU Huimin, HUANG Guoping, WEI Guangdong, QI Xiaochen, CHEN Bolang*. Influence of Phosphorus Fertilization on Nutrient Uptake and Phosphorus Use Efficiency of Cotton under Mechanical Harvest Cropping Model [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2018, 20(8): 91-99. |
[12] | QI Xiaochen1§, ZHAO Ku1§, YE Zupeng1, WANG Ting2, CHEN Bolang1*. Effects of Sophora alopecuroides Green Manure on Growth and Nutrient Characteristics of Melon [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2018, 20(6): 104-112. |
[13] | GU Yong1, XIE Yunbo1, ZHANG Yonghui1, CAI Yan2, SHEN Jie2,SONG Yang2, ZHOU Zehong2, LI Bin3, LI Bing2*. Dry Matter Accumulation and Nutrient Uptake of Flue-cured Tobacco Under Different Planting Patterns [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2018, 20(4): 115-122. |
[14] | LIU Zhihong1, SHAO Huifang1*, WANG Lin1, KONG Dehui2, MU Tong1,HUANG Wuxing1, XU Zicheng1. Analysis of Vertical Distribution Characteristics of Leaf-type in Flue-cured Tobacco Based on Nitrogen Effect [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2018, 20(4): 123-131. |
[15] | LIU Lingdi1§, LIU Mengxing2§, SUN Xue3, WANG Miaomiao1, XIE Xiaoliang1*, WEN Chunxiu1*, TIAN Wei1, JIA Dongsheng1, BIAN Jianbo1. Dry Matter Accumulation and Absorption and Distribution of N,P,K in Isatis indigotica [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2017, 19(6): 39-45. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||