Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology ›› 2022, Vol. 24 ›› Issue (9): 129-138.DOI: 10.13304/j.nykjdb.2021.0321
• ANIMAL AND PLANT HEALTH • Previous Articles
Wei WANG1(), Lijuan XIE1, Dongya XIAO2, Gensheng CHEN3, Liang XIE3, Ziming WU1, Xugen SHI1(
), Huijie LI4(
)
Received:
2021-04-15
Accepted:
2021-06-01
Online:
2022-09-15
Published:
2022-10-11
Contact:
Xugen SHI,Huijie LI
王巍1(), 谢莉娟1, 肖东芽2, 陈根生3, 谢靓3, 吴自明1, 石绪根1(
), 李辉婕4(
)
通讯作者:
石绪根,李辉婕
作者简介:
王巍 E-mail:275121346@qq.com
基金资助:
CLC Number:
Wei WANG, Lijuan XIE, Dongya XIAO, Gensheng CHEN, Liang XIE, Ziming WU, Xugen SHI, Huijie LI. Research on the Green Control Technology Model of Diseases and Insects in Double-cropping Rice in Jiangxi Province[J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2022, 24(9): 129-138.
王巍, 谢莉娟, 肖东芽, 陈根生, 谢靓, 吴自明, 石绪根, 李辉婕. 江西省双季稻病虫害绿色防控技术模式探究[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2022, 24(9): 129-138.
处理 Treatment | 每季施药次数 Application times per season | 药剂名称 Name of drugs | 用药量 Appication dosage/(mL·hm-2) |
---|---|---|---|
CK:农户自防Farmer's control | 第1次First | 5%阿维菌素 5% abamectin | 2 250 |
20%辛硫酸20% lipoic acid | 1 500 | ||
第2次Second | 5%阿维菌素5% abamectin | 2 250 | |
30%苯甲·丙环唑30% benzyl-propiazole | 300 | ||
80%烯啶·吡蚜酮80% enidine-pymetrozine | 120 | ||
75%三环唑75% tricyclazole | 450 | ||
第3次Third | 40%水胺硫磷40% isocarbophos | 1 500 | |
5%阿维菌素5% abamectin | 2 250 | ||
80%杀虫单80% molosultap | 1 500 | ||
10%井冈·蜡芽菌10% Validamycin-Bacillus cereus | 6 000 | ||
80%烯啶·吡蚜酮80% enidine-pymetrozine | 120 | ||
75%三环唑75% tricyclazole | 450 | ||
G:绿色防控Green control technology | 第1次First | 20%氯虫苯甲酰胺 20% chlorantraniliprole | 225 |
5%阿维菌素5% abamectin | 225 | ||
75%肟菌酯·戊唑醇75% NATIVO | 150 | ||
第2次Second | 12%氟唑菌酰胺 12% fluxapyroxad | 240 | |
20%呋虫胺 20% dinotefuran | 150 | ||
32 000 iu·mg-1苏云金芽孢杆菌 | 1 500 | ||
32 000 iu·mg-1 Bacillus thuringiensis | |||
10%四氯虫酰胺 10% tetrachlorantraniliprole | 600 |
Table 1 Drugs used in test treatments
处理 Treatment | 每季施药次数 Application times per season | 药剂名称 Name of drugs | 用药量 Appication dosage/(mL·hm-2) |
---|---|---|---|
CK:农户自防Farmer's control | 第1次First | 5%阿维菌素 5% abamectin | 2 250 |
20%辛硫酸20% lipoic acid | 1 500 | ||
第2次Second | 5%阿维菌素5% abamectin | 2 250 | |
30%苯甲·丙环唑30% benzyl-propiazole | 300 | ||
80%烯啶·吡蚜酮80% enidine-pymetrozine | 120 | ||
75%三环唑75% tricyclazole | 450 | ||
第3次Third | 40%水胺硫磷40% isocarbophos | 1 500 | |
5%阿维菌素5% abamectin | 2 250 | ||
80%杀虫单80% molosultap | 1 500 | ||
10%井冈·蜡芽菌10% Validamycin-Bacillus cereus | 6 000 | ||
80%烯啶·吡蚜酮80% enidine-pymetrozine | 120 | ||
75%三环唑75% tricyclazole | 450 | ||
G:绿色防控Green control technology | 第1次First | 20%氯虫苯甲酰胺 20% chlorantraniliprole | 225 |
5%阿维菌素5% abamectin | 225 | ||
75%肟菌酯·戊唑醇75% NATIVO | 150 | ||
第2次Second | 12%氟唑菌酰胺 12% fluxapyroxad | 240 | |
20%呋虫胺 20% dinotefuran | 150 | ||
32 000 iu·mg-1苏云金芽孢杆菌 | 1 500 | ||
32 000 iu·mg-1 Bacillus thuringiensis | |||
10%四氯虫酰胺 10% tetrachlorantraniliprole | 600 |
Fig. 1 Rice dead heart percentage of Chilo suppressalis in rice field under different treatments from 2019 to 2020Note: Different lowercase letters in same index indicate significant difference between different treatments at P<0.05 level.
Fig. 2 Rice dead heart percentage of Cnaphalocrocis medinalis in rice field under different treatments from 2019 to 2020Note: Different lowercase letters in same index indicate significant difference between different treatments at P<0.05 level.
Fig. 3 Rice dead heart percentage of planthoppers in rice field under different treatments from 2019 to 2020Note: Different lowercase letters in same index indicate significant difference between different treatments at P<0.05 level.
Fig. 4 Rice dead heart percentage of Rhizoctonia solani in rice field under different treatments from 2019 to 2020Note: Different lowercase letters in same index indicate significant difference between different treatments at P<0.05 level.
Fig.5 Rice dead heart percentage of Magnaporthe grisea Barr in rice field under different treatments from 2019 to 2020Note: Different lowercase letters in same index indicate significant difference between different treatments at P<0.05 level.
年 Year | 季别Season | 示范地Locality | 处理Treatment | 有效穗数 Panicle number/(104·hm-2) | 每穗粒数 Grains per panicle | 结实率 Filled grain percentage/% | 千粒重 1 000-grain weight/g | 产量 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2019 | 早稻 Early rice | 新干 Xingan | G | 324.33±10.81 ab | 131.09±21.71 a | 81.38±0.09 a | 28.63±0.26 a | 7 545.00 a |
CK | 352.12±9.57 a | 113.11±24.71 b | 82.06±0.13 a | 27.99±0.16 b | 7 272.60 a | |||
峡江 Xiajiang | G | 319.60±7.11 ab | 147.11±42.05 a | 80.47±0.08 a | 27.54±0.18b | 7 788.15 a | ||
CK | 342.67±9.54 a | 131.51±37.26 b | 77.56±0.10 a | 28.57±0.24 a | 7 309.05 a | |||
晚稻 Late rice | 新干 Xingan | G | 594.74±11.53 a | 164.71±33.43 ab | 85.31±0.05 a | 21.17±2.06 a | 8 628.00 a | |
CK | 557.78±12.31 ab | 172.52±17.18 a | 82.89±0.06 b | 19.93±0.97 b | 8 023.50 a | |||
峡江 Xiajiang | G | 555.83±14.45 a | 111.57±15.09 a | 82.22±0.07 a | 19.62±1.73 a | 8 304.00 a | ||
CK | 516.93±10.45 b | 102.79±16.57 ab | 81.93±0.02 a | 17.44±0.97 b | 7 321.05 b | |||
2020 | 早稻 Early rice | 新干 Xingan | G | 416.88±9.42 a | 120.89±16.89a | 83.21±0.06 a | 21.34±0.21 a | 8 361.00 a |
CK | 411.32±11.84 a | 117.39±14.26 a | 82.28±0.05 a | 21.45±0.69 a | 7 861.50 b | |||
峡江 Xiajiang | G | 344.62±10.80 a | 111.63±14.89 a | 85.27±0.06 a | 22.38±0.53 a | 7 252.65 a | ||
CK | 305.71±9.58 a | 125.04±45.15 a | 80.00±0.09 b | 22.13±0.26 a | 6 651.40 a | |||
晚稻 Late rice | 新干 Xingan | G | 389.08±10.82 a | 115.77±10.25 a | 64.28±0.10 a | 20.17±1.24 a | 6 081.00 a | |
CK | 379.91±10.47 a | 113.11±24.71 a | 61.57±0.03 a | 19.33±0.84 b | 5 800.50 a | |||
峡江 Xiajiang | G | 287.09±9.47 a | 166.87±10.25 a | 79.27±0.13 a | 16.56±1.67 a | 7 098.00 a | ||
CK | 294.04±10.65 a | 151.62±15.88 a | 77.19±0.14 a | 15.87±0.62 a | 6 274.63 b |
Table 2 Yield and its components of in double-cropping rice field from 2019 to 2020
年 Year | 季别Season | 示范地Locality | 处理Treatment | 有效穗数 Panicle number/(104·hm-2) | 每穗粒数 Grains per panicle | 结实率 Filled grain percentage/% | 千粒重 1 000-grain weight/g | 产量 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2019 | 早稻 Early rice | 新干 Xingan | G | 324.33±10.81 ab | 131.09±21.71 a | 81.38±0.09 a | 28.63±0.26 a | 7 545.00 a |
CK | 352.12±9.57 a | 113.11±24.71 b | 82.06±0.13 a | 27.99±0.16 b | 7 272.60 a | |||
峡江 Xiajiang | G | 319.60±7.11 ab | 147.11±42.05 a | 80.47±0.08 a | 27.54±0.18b | 7 788.15 a | ||
CK | 342.67±9.54 a | 131.51±37.26 b | 77.56±0.10 a | 28.57±0.24 a | 7 309.05 a | |||
晚稻 Late rice | 新干 Xingan | G | 594.74±11.53 a | 164.71±33.43 ab | 85.31±0.05 a | 21.17±2.06 a | 8 628.00 a | |
CK | 557.78±12.31 ab | 172.52±17.18 a | 82.89±0.06 b | 19.93±0.97 b | 8 023.50 a | |||
峡江 Xiajiang | G | 555.83±14.45 a | 111.57±15.09 a | 82.22±0.07 a | 19.62±1.73 a | 8 304.00 a | ||
CK | 516.93±10.45 b | 102.79±16.57 ab | 81.93±0.02 a | 17.44±0.97 b | 7 321.05 b | |||
2020 | 早稻 Early rice | 新干 Xingan | G | 416.88±9.42 a | 120.89±16.89a | 83.21±0.06 a | 21.34±0.21 a | 8 361.00 a |
CK | 411.32±11.84 a | 117.39±14.26 a | 82.28±0.05 a | 21.45±0.69 a | 7 861.50 b | |||
峡江 Xiajiang | G | 344.62±10.80 a | 111.63±14.89 a | 85.27±0.06 a | 22.38±0.53 a | 7 252.65 a | ||
CK | 305.71±9.58 a | 125.04±45.15 a | 80.00±0.09 b | 22.13±0.26 a | 6 651.40 a | |||
晚稻 Late rice | 新干 Xingan | G | 389.08±10.82 a | 115.77±10.25 a | 64.28±0.10 a | 20.17±1.24 a | 6 081.00 a | |
CK | 379.91±10.47 a | 113.11±24.71 a | 61.57±0.03 a | 19.33±0.84 b | 5 800.50 a | |||
峡江 Xiajiang | G | 287.09±9.47 a | 166.87±10.25 a | 79.27±0.13 a | 16.56±1.67 a | 7 098.00 a | ||
CK | 294.04±10.65 a | 151.62±15.88 a | 77.19±0.14 a | 15.87±0.62 a | 6 274.63 b |
检测项目Test item | 检测结果Test result | 检出限Detection limit/ (mg·kg-1) | 检测方法参考标准Test method |
---|---|---|---|
阿维菌素 Abamectin | 未检出 Not detect | 0.007 | GB 23200.20—2016[ |
氯虫苯甲酰胺 Chlorantraniliprole | 未检出 Not detect | 0.005 | GB/T 20770—2008[ |
四氯虫酰胺 Tetrachlorantraniliprole | 未检出 Not detect | 0.003 | GB/T 20770—2008[ |
呋虫胺 Dinotefuran | 未检出 Not detect | 0.002 | GB/T 20770—2008[ |
氟唑菌酰胺 Fluxapyroxad | 未检出 Not detect | 0.005 | GB/T 20770—2008[ |
Table 3 Test results of pesticide residues in the double-cropping green and sustainable management zone
检测项目Test item | 检测结果Test result | 检出限Detection limit/ (mg·kg-1) | 检测方法参考标准Test method |
---|---|---|---|
阿维菌素 Abamectin | 未检出 Not detect | 0.007 | GB 23200.20—2016[ |
氯虫苯甲酰胺 Chlorantraniliprole | 未检出 Not detect | 0.005 | GB/T 20770—2008[ |
四氯虫酰胺 Tetrachlorantraniliprole | 未检出 Not detect | 0.003 | GB/T 20770—2008[ |
呋虫胺 Dinotefuran | 未检出 Not detect | 0.002 | GB/T 20770—2008[ |
氟唑菌酰胺 Fluxapyroxad | 未检出 Not detect | 0.005 | GB/T 20770—2008[ |
项目 Item | 绿色防控区 Green control technology | 农户自防区Farmer’s field | 减少量Reduced | 降幅 Decreased range/% |
---|---|---|---|---|
用药次数/(次·季-1) Number of drugs/(frequency·quarterly-1) | 2 | 3 | 1 | 33.33 |
平均用药成本/(元·hm-2) Average medication cost/(yuan·hm-2) | 785.25 | 1 099.35 | 141.60 | 12.88 |
振频杀虫灯、性诱剂成本/(元·hm-2) Cost of vibration insecticidal lamps and sex attractants/(yuan·hm-2) | 610 | — | — | — |
施药费/(元·hm-2) Drug cost/(yuan·hm-2) | 240 | 675 | 375 | 55.55 |
药工本费合计/(元·hm-2) Cost of work/(yuan·hm-2) | 1 635.25 | 1 774.35 | 139.10 | 7.84 |
Table 4 Benefit comparison between ecological controlling field and farmer’s field in Jiangxi province from 2019 to 2020
项目 Item | 绿色防控区 Green control technology | 农户自防区Farmer’s field | 减少量Reduced | 降幅 Decreased range/% |
---|---|---|---|---|
用药次数/(次·季-1) Number of drugs/(frequency·quarterly-1) | 2 | 3 | 1 | 33.33 |
平均用药成本/(元·hm-2) Average medication cost/(yuan·hm-2) | 785.25 | 1 099.35 | 141.60 | 12.88 |
振频杀虫灯、性诱剂成本/(元·hm-2) Cost of vibration insecticidal lamps and sex attractants/(yuan·hm-2) | 610 | — | — | — |
施药费/(元·hm-2) Drug cost/(yuan·hm-2) | 240 | 675 | 375 | 55.55 |
药工本费合计/(元·hm-2) Cost of work/(yuan·hm-2) | 1 635.25 | 1 774.35 | 139.10 | 7.84 |
1 | 夏敬源.我国重大农业生物灾害暴发现状与防控成效[J].中国植保导刊,2008,28(1):5-9. |
XIA J Y. Outbreaks of major agricultural pests and the control achievements in China [J]. China Plant Prot., 2008,28(1):5-9. | |
2 | SIDDIQUE K H M, JOHANSEN C, TURNER N C, et al.. Innovations in agronomy for food legumes. a review [J]. Agron. Sustain. Develop., 2012,32(1):45-64. |
3 | BRUCE T J A, SMART L E, BIRCH A N E, et al.. Prospects for plant defence activators and biocontrol in IPM-concepts and lessons learnt so far [J]. Crop Prot., 2017, 97:128-134. |
4 | 关晓溪,杨柳,曾远榆,等.贵州省水稻害虫绿色防控措施与思考[J].中国植保导刊,2020,40(12):92-94. |
GUAN X X, YANG L, ZENG Y Y, et al.. Measures on green control of rice pest in Guizhou province [J]. China Plant Prot., 2020, 40(12):92-94. | |
5 | 徐国峰.豫南稻区2018年水稻病虫害绿色防控集成技术示范与推广[J].种业导刊,2019(11):18-19. |
XU G F.Demonstration and promotion of integrated technology for green control of rice pest and pest in south henan rice region in 2018 [J]. J. Seed Ind. Guide, 2019(11):18-19. | |
6 | 贺雄,丁朝辉,胡立冬,等.生物与化学农药对早稻主要病害绿色防控技术初探[J].农药, 2020,59(1):68-73. |
HE X, DING C H, HU L D, et al.. Preliminary study on green control technology of biological and chemical pesticides on main diseases of early rice [J]. Agrochemicals, 2020, 59(1):68-73. | |
7 | 游世奇.福建长汀水稻二化螟绿色防控效果评价及效益分析[J].中国植保导刊,2020,40(5):65-66. |
YOU S Q. Evaluation and benefit analysis of Fujian Changting rice double borer [J]. China Plant Prot. 2020, 40(5):65-66. | |
8 | 何剑,苟红敏,李永平,等.城固县水稻病虫害绿色防控技术集成示范成效[J].中国植保导刊,2019,39(4):89-93. |
HE J, GOU H M, LI Y P, et al.. Integrated demonstration achievements of green prevention and control technology in Chenggu County [J]. China Plant Prot., 2019, 39(4):89-93. | |
9 | GURR G M, LU Z X, ZHENG X S, et al.. Multi-country evidence that crop diversification promotes ecological intensification of agriculture [J/OL]. Nat. Plants, 2016, 2:16014 [2021-02-02]. . |
10 | MATSON P A, PARTON W J, POWER A G, et al.. Agricultural intensification and ecosystem properties [J]. Science, 1997, 277(5325):1-2. |
11 | WOOD S A, KARP D S, DE CLERCK F, et al.. Functional traits in agriculture: agrobiodiversity and ecosystem services [J]. Trends Ecol. Evol., 2015, 30(9):531-539. |
12 | BOMMARCO R, KLEIJN D, POTTS S G. Ecological intensification: harnessing ecosystem services for food security [J]. Trends Ecol. Evol., 2013, 28(4):230-238. |
13 | 农业部农药检定所. 农药田间药效试验准则(一)杀菌剂防治水稻叶部病害: [S].北京:中国标准出版社,2000. |
14 | 农业部农药检定所. 农药田间药效试验准则(一)杀菌剂防治水稻纹枯病: [S].北京:中国标准出版社,2000. |
15 | 中华人民共和国国家质量监督检验检疫总局,中国国家标准化管理委员会. 粮谷中486种农药及相关化学品残留量的测定液相色谱-串联质谱法: [S].北京:中国标准出版社,2008. |
16 | 国家市场监督管理总局,国家卫生健康委员会. 食品中阿维菌素残留量的测定液相色谱-质谱/质谱法: [S].北京:中国标准出版社 2016. |
17 | 赵正洪,戴力,黄见良,等.长江中游稻区水稻产业发展现状、问题与建议[J].中国水稻科学,2019,33(6):553-564. |
ZHAO Z H, DAI L, HUANG J L, et al.. Status, problems and solutions in rice industry development in the middle reaches of the Yangtze river [J]. Chin. J. Rice Sci., 2019, 33(6):553-564. | |
18 | 樊胜根.借鉴国际经验防范疫情带来的食物安全问题[N].中国科学报,2020-03-03(003). |
19 | 周泉,黄国勤.江西省水稻绿色生产的问题与对策研究[J].中国农业资源与区划,2020,41(2):9-15. |
ZHOU Q, HUANG G Q. Research on green development of rice in Jiangxi province [J]. Chin. J. Agric. Resour. Regional Planning, 2020, 41(2):9-15. | |
20 | 黄水金,刘剑青,秦文婧,等.二化螟越冬幼虫在稻株内的分布及其控制技术研究[J].江西农业学报,2010,22(11):91-93. |
HUANG S J, LIU J Q, QIN W J, et al.. Studieson distribution of over wintering larvae of chilo suppressalis (walker) in rice stemandlts control technique [J]. Acta Agric. Univ. Jiangxiensis, 2010, 22(11):91-93. | |
21 | 王国荣,韩尧平,沈蔷,等.施肥调节对水稻病虫害发生和产量的影响[J].中国稻米,2015,21(6):94-97. |
WANG G R, HAN Y P, SHEN Q, et al.. Effects of modified fertilizer application on rice pests, diseases and yields [J]. China Rice, 2015, 21(6):94-97. | |
22 | 莫晓畅,娄永根.水稻害虫化学生态调控研究进展[J].应用昆虫学报,2016,53(3):435-445. |
MO X C, LOU Y G. Review of the use of naturally occurring, ecologically active chemicals to regulate insect pests in rice crops [J]. Chin. J. Appl. Entomol., 2016, 53(3):435-445. | |
23 | 薛新宇,秦维彩,孙竹,等.N-3型无人直升机施药方式对稻飞虱和稻纵卷叶螟防治效果的影响[J].植物保护学报,2013,40(3):273-278. |
XUE X Y, QING W C, SUN Z, et al.. Effects of N-3 UAV spraying methods on the efficiency of insrcticides against planthoppers and Cnaphalocrocis medinalis [J]. J. Plant Prot., 2013, 40(3):273-278. |
[1] | Lijuan ZHANG, Yukun QIN, Huihuang CHENG, Yongqi LI, Haihua LUO. Research on Characteristics of Nitrogen and Phosphorus Loss from Surface Runoff of Cotton Field in Northern Jiangxi Province of Poyang Lake Region [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2022, 24(6): 166-175. |
[2] | JIANG Xinfeng, SUN Yongming, TONG Zhongfei, WANG Xinming, HUANG Shangshu, LI Fuguang, LI Chen, JIANG Lianghui, . Effects of Base Application Depths of Rapeseed Cake Fertilization on Tea Yield, Quality and Nitrogen Utilization [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2021, 23(12): 172-178. |
[3] | ZHAN Junwen1,2, SHEN Xueting3, HE Kuanxin4, LIANG Shuping1, LI Lixin4, JIAO Shaohe4, YU Jianjun2*. Study on Relationship between Softness and Physical Characteristics of Flue-cured Tobacco and the Suitable Softness Range in Jiangxi Province [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2017, 19(1): 131-137. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||