Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology ›› 2023, Vol. 25 ›› Issue (8): 65-75.DOI: 10.13304/j.nykjdb.2021.0876
• BIOTECHNOLOGY & LIFE SCIENCE • Previous Articles Next Articles
Dongdong ZHANG1(), Hongwei HAN2(
), Zhenfan YU1, Bin ZENG1(
), Jiahui YANG1, Wenwen GAO1, Xintong MA1
Received:
2021-10-14
Accepted:
2022-01-18
Online:
2023-08-20
Published:
2023-09-07
Contact:
Bin ZENG
张冬冬1(), 韩宏伟2(
), 余镇藩1, 曾斌1(
), 杨佳惠1, 高雯雯1, 马昕彤1
通讯作者:
曾斌
作者简介:
张冬冬 E-mail:583787672@qq.com基金资助:
CLC Number:
Dongdong ZHANG, Hongwei HAN, Zhenfan YU, Bin ZENG, Jiahui YANG, Wenwen GAO, Xintong MA. Codon Preference Analysis of Chloroplast Genome in 12 Rosaceae Plants[J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2023, 25(8): 65-75.
张冬冬, 韩宏伟, 余镇藩, 曾斌, 杨佳惠, 高雯雯, 马昕彤. 12种蔷薇科植物叶绿体基因组密码子偏好性分析[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2023, 25(8): 65-75.
属 Genus | 物种 Species | NCBI登录号 Accession number in the NCBI database | 长度 Length/bp |
---|---|---|---|
木瓜属Chaenomeles | 木瓜Chaenomeles sinensis | KT932967.1 | 159 351 |
枇杷属Eriobotrya Lindl. | 枇杷Eriobotrya japonica | KT633951.1 | 159 137 |
草莓属Fragaria L. | 草莓Fragaria × ananassa | KY358226.1 | 155 549 |
苹果属Malus Mill. | 苹果Malus domestica | MK434916.1 | 159 926 |
西府海棠Malus micromalus | MF062434.1 | 159 834 | |
杏属Armeniaca Mill. | 杏Prunus armeniaca | MH700954.1 | 158 070 |
梅花Prunus mume | MH727486.1 | 157 783 | |
桃属Amygdalus L. | 扁桃Prunus dulcis | MH700953.1 | 157 916 |
桃Prunus persica | HQ336405.1 | 157 790 | |
樱属Cerasus Mill. | 樱桃Prunus pseudocerasus | KX255667.1 | 157 834 |
李属Prunus L. | 中国李Prunus salicina | MH700952.1 | 157 916 |
梨属Pyrus | 西洋梨Pyrus communis | MN577870.1 | 160 171 |
Table 1 Chloroplast genomes of 12 Rosaceae collected in this study
属 Genus | 物种 Species | NCBI登录号 Accession number in the NCBI database | 长度 Length/bp |
---|---|---|---|
木瓜属Chaenomeles | 木瓜Chaenomeles sinensis | KT932967.1 | 159 351 |
枇杷属Eriobotrya Lindl. | 枇杷Eriobotrya japonica | KT633951.1 | 159 137 |
草莓属Fragaria L. | 草莓Fragaria × ananassa | KY358226.1 | 155 549 |
苹果属Malus Mill. | 苹果Malus domestica | MK434916.1 | 159 926 |
西府海棠Malus micromalus | MF062434.1 | 159 834 | |
杏属Armeniaca Mill. | 杏Prunus armeniaca | MH700954.1 | 158 070 |
梅花Prunus mume | MH727486.1 | 157 783 | |
桃属Amygdalus L. | 扁桃Prunus dulcis | MH700953.1 | 157 916 |
桃Prunus persica | HQ336405.1 | 157 790 | |
樱属Cerasus Mill. | 樱桃Prunus pseudocerasus | KX255667.1 | 157 834 |
李属Prunus L. | 中国李Prunus salicina | MH700952.1 | 157 916 |
梨属Pyrus | 西洋梨Pyrus communis | MN577870.1 | 160 171 |
物种Specie | CP | T3 | C3 | A3 | G3 | GC1 | GC2 | GC3 | GCall |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
木瓜Chaenomeles sinensis | 31.22 | 27.91 | 45.57 | 37.76 | 29.74 | 46.98 | 39.47 | 28.28 | 36.66 |
枇杷Eriobotrya japonica | 31.19 | 27.92 | 45.56 | 37.79 | 29.73 | 46.94 | 39.50 | 28.27 | 36.72 |
草莓Fragaria × ananassa | 31.66 | 28.57 | 45.60 | 37.73 | 30.62 | 47.06 | 39.45 | 29.29 | 37.23 |
苹果Malus domestica | 31.22 | 27.90 | 45.56 | 37.75 | 29.73 | 47.00 | 39.43 | 28.32 | 36.57 |
西府海棠Malus micromalus | 31.77 | 28.29 | 45.46 | 37.66 | 29.80 | 46.97 | 39.44 | 28.28 | 36.61 |
杏Prunus armeniaca | 31.76 | 28.20 | 45.36 | 37.62 | 29.81 | 46.86 | 39.40 | 28.43 | 36.72 |
梅花Prunus mume | 31.26 | 27.86 | 45.48 | 37.76 | 29.89 | 46.90 | 39.40 | 28.61 | 36.76 |
扁桃Prunus dulcis | 31.75 | 28.20 | 45.34 | 37.60 | 29.83 | 46.88 | 39.34 | 28.45 | 36.73 |
桃Prunus persica | 31.26 | 27.86 | 45.48 | 37.74 | 29.86 | 46.90 | 39.37 | 28.58 | 36.75 |
樱桃Prunus pseudocerasus | 31.70 | 28.21 | 45.35 | 37.61 | 29.88 | 46.80 | 39.38 | 28.45 | 36.73 |
中国李Prunus salicina | 31.74 | 28.21 | 45.39 | 37.61 | 29.80 | 46.90 | 39.36 | 28.45 | 36.75 |
西洋梨Pyrus communis | 31.75 | 28.30 | 45.47 | 37.67 | 29.83 | 46.98 | 39.46 | 28.35 | 36.54 |
Table 2 Parameter characteristics of codon in chloroplast genome of 12 rosaceae species
物种Specie | CP | T3 | C3 | A3 | G3 | GC1 | GC2 | GC3 | GCall |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
木瓜Chaenomeles sinensis | 31.22 | 27.91 | 45.57 | 37.76 | 29.74 | 46.98 | 39.47 | 28.28 | 36.66 |
枇杷Eriobotrya japonica | 31.19 | 27.92 | 45.56 | 37.79 | 29.73 | 46.94 | 39.50 | 28.27 | 36.72 |
草莓Fragaria × ananassa | 31.66 | 28.57 | 45.60 | 37.73 | 30.62 | 47.06 | 39.45 | 29.29 | 37.23 |
苹果Malus domestica | 31.22 | 27.90 | 45.56 | 37.75 | 29.73 | 47.00 | 39.43 | 28.32 | 36.57 |
西府海棠Malus micromalus | 31.77 | 28.29 | 45.46 | 37.66 | 29.80 | 46.97 | 39.44 | 28.28 | 36.61 |
杏Prunus armeniaca | 31.76 | 28.20 | 45.36 | 37.62 | 29.81 | 46.86 | 39.40 | 28.43 | 36.72 |
梅花Prunus mume | 31.26 | 27.86 | 45.48 | 37.76 | 29.89 | 46.90 | 39.40 | 28.61 | 36.76 |
扁桃Prunus dulcis | 31.75 | 28.20 | 45.34 | 37.60 | 29.83 | 46.88 | 39.34 | 28.45 | 36.73 |
桃Prunus persica | 31.26 | 27.86 | 45.48 | 37.74 | 29.86 | 46.90 | 39.37 | 28.58 | 36.75 |
樱桃Prunus pseudocerasus | 31.70 | 28.21 | 45.35 | 37.61 | 29.88 | 46.80 | 39.38 | 28.45 | 36.73 |
中国李Prunus salicina | 31.74 | 28.21 | 45.39 | 37.61 | 29.80 | 46.90 | 39.36 | 28.45 | 36.75 |
西洋梨Pyrus communis | 31.75 | 28.30 | 45.47 | 37.67 | 29.83 | 46.98 | 39.46 | 28.35 | 36.54 |
Fig. 2 Correlation between CN, GC1, GC2, GC3, GCall and ENCNote: Blue indicates positive correlation; orange indicates negative correlation; the dot with darker color and larger circle indicates higher correlation.
1 | XU C, DONG W P, LI W Q, et al.. Comparative analysis of six Lagerstroemia complete chloroplast genomes [J/OL]. Front. Plant Sci., 2017, 8:15 [2021-09-10]. . |
2 | 吴静妍,葛新新,李海英,等.蔷薇科果树组织培养研究进展[J].安徽农业科学,2020,48(21):10-12. |
WU J Y, GE X X, LI H Y, et al.. Research progress on tissue culture of Rosaceae fruit trees [J]. J. Anhui Agric. Sci., 2020, 48(21):10-12. | |
3 | 刘玉,刘聚栋.月季在园林布景中的应用[J].乡村科技,2021,12(24):106-107. |
4 | GUTTERIDGE S. The impact of a changing atmosphere on chloroplast function, photosynthesis, yield, and food security [J]. Essays Biol., 2018, 62(1):1-11. |
5 | 陈柯伊,李朝娜,成敏敏,等.不同叶色矢竹叶绿体结构和光系统特性差异[J].植物学报,2018,53(4):509-518. |
CHEN K Y, LI Z N, CHENG M M, et al.. Chloroplast ultrastructure and chlorophyll fluorescence characteristics of three cultivars of Pseudosasa japonica [J]. Chin. Bull. Bot., 2020, 48(21):10-12. | |
6 | NAKAMURA M, SUGIURA M. Translation efficiencies of synonymous codons for arginine differ dramatically and are not correlated with codon usage in chloroplasts [J]. Gene, 2011, 472(1-2):50-54. |
7 | DINAKAR C, QINGWEI Z, DOROTHEA B. Protection of photosynthesis in desiccation-tolerant resurrection plants [J]. J. Plant Physiol., 2018, 227:84-92. |
8 | ANDREW W G, SHEIL A A, LI Z Z, et al.. Comparative genomics of 11 complete chloroplast genomes of Senecioneae (Asteraceae) species: DNA barcodes and phylogenetics [J/OL]. Bot. Stud., 2019, 60(1):17 [2021-09-10]. . |
9 | WEI Q K, JIN H Y. The complete chloroplast genome sequence of Morus cathayana and Morus multicaulis, and comparative analysis within genus Morus L [J/OL]. Peer J., 2017, 5:e3037 [2021-09-10]. . |
10 | SUZUKI H, MORTON B R. Codon adaptation of plastid genes [J/OL]. PLoS ONE, 2016, 11(5):e0154306 [2021-09-10]. . |
11 | NAKAMURA M, SUGIURA M. Translation efficiencies of synonymous codons for arginine differ dramatically and are not correlated with codon usage in chloroplasts [J]. Gene, 2011, 472(1-2):50-54. |
12 | PURABI M, ROFINA Y B, KATHARINA M N, et al.. Codon usage and codon pair patterns in non-grass monocot genomes [J]. Ann. Bot., 2017, 120:893-909. |
13 | LIU M Y, DONG H, WANG M, et al.. Evolutionary divergence of function and expression of laccase genes in plants [J/OL]. J. Genet., 2020, 99(1):23 [2021-09-10]. . |
14 | LIU X Y, LI Y, JI K K, et al.. Genome-wide codon usage pattern analysis reveals the correlation between codon usage bias and gene expression in Cuscuta australis [J]. Genomics, 2020, 112 (4):2695-2702. |
15 | JENSEN P E, LEISTER D. Chloroplast evolution, structure and functions [J/OL]. F1000Prime Rep., 2014, 6:40 [2021-09-10]. . |
16 | ZHANG D Z, RABIA B P, LIU J J, et al.. Morphological diversity and correlation analysis of phenotypes and quality traits of proso millet (Panicum miliaceum L.) core collections [J]. J. Integr. Agric., 2019, 18(5):958-969. |
17 | HD B, DONG H, JIANG C, et al.. Analysis of codon usage patterns in Ginkgo biloba reveals codon usage tendency from A/U-ending to G/C-ending [J/OL]. Sci. Rep., 2016, 6(1):35927 [2021-09-10]. . |
18 | WRIGHT F. The ‘effective number of codons’ used in a gene [J]. Gene, 1990, 87(1):23-29. |
19 | SHIVANI G, PATRA P K, YADAV M K. New insights into the factors affecting synonymous codon usage in human infecting Plasmodium species [J]. Acta Trop., 2017, 176:29-33. |
20 | RENSING S, FRITZOWSKY D, LANG D, et al.. Protein encoding genes in an ancient plant: analysis of codon usage, retained genes and splice sites in a moss, Physcomitrella patens [J/OL]. BMC Genomics., 2005, 6(1):43 [2021-09-10]. . |
21 | 吴宪明,吴松锋,任大明,等.密码子偏性的分析方法及相关研究进展[J].遗传,2007(4):420-426. |
WU X M, WU S F, REN D M, et al.. The analysis method and progress in the study of codon bias [J]. Hereditas., 2007(4):420-426. | |
22 | SONG H, LIU J, SONG Q, et al.. Comprehensive analysis of codon usage bias in seven Epichloë species and their peramine-coding genes [J/OL]. Front. Microbiol., 2017, 8:1419 [2021-09-10]. . |
23 | ZHANG Y, NIE X, JIA X, et al.. Analysis of codon usage patterns of the chloroplast genomes in the Poaceae family [J/OL]. Aust. J. Bot., 2012, 60 (5):461 [2021-09-10]. . |
24 | MCLEAN M J, WOLFE K H, DEVINE K M. Base composition skews, replication orientation, and gene orientation in 12 prokaryote genomes [J]. J. Mol. Evol., 1998, 47(6):691-696. |
25 | 唐玉娟,赵英,黄国弟,等.芒果叶绿体基因组密码子使用偏好性分析[J].热带作物学报,2021,42(8):2143-2150. |
TANG Y J, ZHAO Y, HUANG G D, et al.. Analysis on codon usage bias of chloroplast genes from mango [J]. Chin. J. Tropical Crop, 2021, 42(8):2143-2150. | |
26 | 王鹏良,杨利平,吴红英,等.普通油茶叶绿体基因组密码子偏好性分析[J].广西植物,2018,38(2):135-144. |
WANG P L, YANG L P, WU H Y, et al.. Condon preference of chloroplast genome in Camellia oleifera [J]. Guihaia, 2018, 38(2):135-144. | |
27 | 刘汉梅,赵耀,顾勇,等.几种植物waxy基因的密码子用法特性分析[J].核农学报,2010,24(3):476-481. |
LIU H M, ZHAO Y, GU Y, et al.. Characterization of codon usage of waxy genes in several plants [J]. J. Nucl. Agric. Sci., 2010, 24(3):476-481. | |
28 | KUMAR S, STECHER G, LI M, et al.. MEGA X: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis across computing platforms [J]. Mol. Biol. Evol., 2018, 35(6):1547-1549. |
29 | LI S C, CHANG L, ZHANG J. Advancing organelle genome transformation and editing for crop improvement [J/OL]. Plant Commun., 2021, 2(2):100141 [2021-09-10]. . |
30 | CHAKRABORTY S, NAG D, MAZUMDER T H, et al.. Codon usage pattern and prediction of gene expression level in Bungarus species [J]. Gene, 2017, 604:48-60. |
31 | 朱婷婷,张磊,陈万生,等.1342个植物叶绿体基因组分析[J].基因组学与应用生物学, 2017,36(10):4323-4333. |
ZHU T T, ZHANG L, CHEN W S, et al.. Analysis of chloroplast genomes in 1342 plants [J]. Genomics Appl. Biol., 2017, 36(10):4323-4333. | |
32 | 季凯凯,宋希强,陈春国,等.木兰科叶绿体基因组的密码子使用特征分析[J].中国农业科技导报,2020,22(11):52-62. |
JI K K, SONG X Q, CHEN C G, et al.. Codon usage profiling of chloroplast genome in Magnoliaceae [J]. J. Agric. Sci. Technol., 2020, 22(11):52-62. | |
33 | WANG Z, XU B, LI B, et al.. Comparative analysis of codon usage patterns in chloroplast genomes of six Euphorbiaceae species [J/OL]. Peer J., 2020, 8:e8251 [2021-09-10]. . |
34 | LI N, LI Y, ZHENG C, et al.. Genome-wide comparative analysis of the codon usage patterns in plants [J]. Genes Genom., 2016, 38:723-731. |
35 | 吴妙丽,陈世品,陈辉.竹亚科叶绿体基因组的密码子使用偏性分析[J].森林与环境学报,2019,39(1):9-14. |
WU M L, CHEN S P, CHEN H. Condon preference of chloroplast genome of Bambusoideae [J]. J. Fores. Env. 2019, 39(1):9-14. | |
36 | 傅建敏,索玉静,刘慧敏,等.柿属植物叶绿体蛋白质编码基因密码子用法[J].经济林研究,2017,35(2):38-44. |
FU J M, SUO Y J, LIU H M, et al.. Analysis on codon usage in the chloroplast protein-coding genes of Diospyros spp [J]. Nonwood Forest Res., 2017, 35(2):38-44. |
[1] | Qiwei YAN, Xianglan LIANG, Qiuyun TAO, Qiuxiang LUO, Song GUO. Analysis of Chloroplast Genome Characteristics and Codon Usage Bias of Fissisfigma polyanthum Merr. [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2022, 24(8): 74-86. |
[2] | Xiang HUANG, Guangming CHU, Xinkai ZHENG, Jintao CHENG, Jianhao CHEN, Yingchun XU, Qijiang JIN, Meihua YANG. Analysis of Codon Usage Bias and Phylogenetic of Chloroplast Genome in Nymphaea [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2022, 24(4): 75-84. |
[3] | SU Yue§, LIU Juanjuan§, WAN Bin, ZHANG Pengju, CHEN Zhenggen, SU Junji, WANG Caixiang. Chloroplast Genome Structure Characteristic and Phylogenetic Analysis of Mulgedium tataricum [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2021, 23(6): 33-42. |
[4] | JI Kaikai1, SONG Xiqiang1, CHEN Chunguo2, LI Ge2, XIE Shangqian1*. Codon Usage Profiling of Chloroplast Genome in Magnoliaceae [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2020, 22(11): 52-62. |
[5] | WANG Yongjie, CHEN Honglian, CHENG Yunsheng, WANG Fen. Isolation, Identification and Drug Sensitivity Analysis of Gold Carp Visceral Sarcoidosis of Pathogen [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2017, 19(12): 104-109. |
[6] | LI Yan-li, HAO Jin-feng, ZHAO Xue-qian, YIN Hong*. Cloning and Expression Analysis of a Hexamerin Gene LmiHex-2 from Locusta migratoria manilensis (Acridoidea: Oedipodidae) [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2016, 18(6): 65-71. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||