Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology ›› 2022, Vol. 24 ›› Issue (8): 192-200.DOI: 10.13304/j.nykjdb.2022.0304
• BIO-MANUFACTURING & RESOURCE AND ECOLOGY • Previous Articles
Li LIU(), Zhongping DU, Yi LI, Laisheng CHEN, Rui HAN(
)
Received:
2022-04-14
Accepted:
2022-05-19
Online:
2022-08-15
Published:
2022-08-22
Contact:
Rui HAN
通讯作者:
韩睿
作者简介:
柳丽 E-mail:894256696@qq.com;
基金资助:
CLC Number:
Li LIU, Zhongping DU, Yi LI, Laisheng CHEN, Rui HAN. Effect of NaOH Pretreatment on Anaerobic Fermentation Characteristics of Hulless Barley Straw[J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2022, 24(8): 192-200.
柳丽, 杜中平, 李屹, 陈来生, 韩睿. NaOH预处理对青稞秸秆厌氧发酵特性的影响[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2022, 24(8): 192-200.
物料 Material | 总固体 Total solid/% | 挥发性固体 Volatile solid/% | pH | 碳含量 Carbon content/% | 氮含量 Nitrogen content/% |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
青稞秸秆Hulless barley straw | 94.58±0.28 | 93.48±0.90 | — | 41.62±0.11 | 1.29±0.02 |
接种物Inoculum | 4.69±0.18 | 1.55±0.10 | 7.50±0.03 | — | — |
Table 1 Characteristics of raw materials and inoculum
物料 Material | 总固体 Total solid/% | 挥发性固体 Volatile solid/% | pH | 碳含量 Carbon content/% | 氮含量 Nitrogen content/% |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
青稞秸秆Hulless barley straw | 94.58±0.28 | 93.48±0.90 | — | 41.62±0.11 | 1.29±0.02 |
接种物Inoculum | 4.69±0.18 | 1.55±0.10 | 7.50±0.03 | — | — |
Fig. 2 Cumulative methane production in different treatmentsNote:Different lowercase letters indicate significant differences between treatments (P<0.05).
处理 Treatment | 产甲烷潜力 Methane production potential/ (mL∙g-1) | 最大产甲烷速率 Maximum methane production rate/(mL∙g-1·d-1) | 产甲烷延滞期 Lag phase/d | R2 | T90/d |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
CK | 146.89 | 11.37 | 2.66 | 0.994 | 22 |
1%NaOH-6 h | 171.30 | 12.35 | -0.20 | 0.990 | 16 |
3%NaOH-6 h | 229.24 | 21.06 | -0.05 | 0.990 | 17 |
5%NaOH-6 h | 237.51 | 18.73 | 0.09 | 0.990 | 16 |
7%NaOH-6 h | 205.73 | 18.87 | -0.01 | 0.990 | 15 |
1%NaOH-12 h | 221.47 | 17.90 | 0.54 | 0.998 | 16 |
3%NaOH-12 h | 231.54 | 25.75 | 0.54 | 0.996 | 13 |
5%NaOH-12 h | 246.25 | 20.97 | 0.00 | 0.991 | 17 |
7%NaOH-12 h | 213.15 | 23.55 | 0.51 | 0.995 | 15 |
1%NaOH-24 h | 179.89 | 13.54 | 0.35 | 0.995 | 16 |
3%NaOH-24 h | 222.24 | 15.71 | -0.96 | 0.991 | 17 |
5%NaOH-24 h | 231.81 | 27.39 | 0.51 | 0.995 | 15 |
7%NaOH-24 h | 184.20 | 19.33 | 0.33 | 0.995 | 16 |
Table 2 Digestion time T90 and kinetic parameters of Gompertz model in different treatments
处理 Treatment | 产甲烷潜力 Methane production potential/ (mL∙g-1) | 最大产甲烷速率 Maximum methane production rate/(mL∙g-1·d-1) | 产甲烷延滞期 Lag phase/d | R2 | T90/d |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
CK | 146.89 | 11.37 | 2.66 | 0.994 | 22 |
1%NaOH-6 h | 171.30 | 12.35 | -0.20 | 0.990 | 16 |
3%NaOH-6 h | 229.24 | 21.06 | -0.05 | 0.990 | 17 |
5%NaOH-6 h | 237.51 | 18.73 | 0.09 | 0.990 | 16 |
7%NaOH-6 h | 205.73 | 18.87 | -0.01 | 0.990 | 15 |
1%NaOH-12 h | 221.47 | 17.90 | 0.54 | 0.998 | 16 |
3%NaOH-12 h | 231.54 | 25.75 | 0.54 | 0.996 | 13 |
5%NaOH-12 h | 246.25 | 20.97 | 0.00 | 0.991 | 17 |
7%NaOH-12 h | 213.15 | 23.55 | 0.51 | 0.995 | 15 |
1%NaOH-24 h | 179.89 | 13.54 | 0.35 | 0.995 | 16 |
3%NaOH-24 h | 222.24 | 15.71 | -0.96 | 0.991 | 17 |
5%NaOH-24 h | 231.81 | 27.39 | 0.51 | 0.995 | 15 |
7%NaOH-24 h | 184.20 | 19.33 | 0.33 | 0.995 | 16 |
波长 Wavelength/(cm-1) | 基团 Group | 纤维组分 Fiber composition | 吸收峰强度变化 Changes of absorption peak intensity |
---|---|---|---|
3 330 | 羟基 O-H Hydroxyl O-H | 木质素Lignin | 降低Reduce |
2 910 | C-H | 纤维素Cellulose | 增高Increase |
2 854 | C-H | 纤维素Cellulose | 增高Increase |
1 621 | 羰基 C=O/苯环 Carbonyl C=O/benzene ring | 半纤维素/木质素Hemicellulose/lignin | 降低Reduce |
Table 3 Changes of group types and fiber components corresponding to different wavelengths
波长 Wavelength/(cm-1) | 基团 Group | 纤维组分 Fiber composition | 吸收峰强度变化 Changes of absorption peak intensity |
---|---|---|---|
3 330 | 羟基 O-H Hydroxyl O-H | 木质素Lignin | 降低Reduce |
2 910 | C-H | 纤维素Cellulose | 增高Increase |
2 854 | C-H | 纤维素Cellulose | 增高Increase |
1 621 | 羰基 C=O/苯环 Carbonyl C=O/benzene ring | 半纤维素/木质素Hemicellulose/lignin | 降低Reduce |
处理 Treatment | 木质素 Lignin | 纤维素 Cellulose | 半纤维素 Hemicellulose |
---|---|---|---|
CK | 14.89±0.10 a | 42.71±0.33 i | 16.73±0.40 a |
1%NaOH-6 h | 10.38±0.46 d | 53.33±1.01 de | 14.26±0.63 d |
3%NaOH-6 h | 12.98±0.13 b | 49.07±2.08 gh | 15.71±0.42 bc |
5%NaOH-6 h | 8.46±0.17 f | 56.49±1.34 bc | 13.31±0.30 e |
7%NaOH-6 h | 5.31±0.07 i | 53.16±1.52 de | 16.26±0.52 ab |
1%NaOH-12 h | 9.65±0.17 e | 52.76±0.34 de | 13.72±0.29 de |
3%NaOH-12 h | 12.43±0.28 c | 48.42±0.70 g | 14.02±0.11 de |
5%NaOH-12 h | 8.63±0.60 f | 57.08±0.09 b | 14.26±0.31 d |
7%NaOH-12 h | 7.54±0.30 g | 52.31±1.23 ef | 15.46±0.46 c |
1%NaOH-24 h | 8.53±0.07 f | 50.69±0.98 fg | 14.33±0.68 d |
3%NaOH-24 h | 9.99±0.29 de | 54.11±0.70 de | 11.66±0.31 f |
5%NaOH-24 h | 8.79±0.41 f | 59.50±1.65 a | 14.09±0.51 de |
7%NaOH-24 h | 6.54±0.39 h | 54.82±0.85 cd | 16.57±0.35 a |
Table 4 Lignocellulose content of hulless barley straw in different treatments
处理 Treatment | 木质素 Lignin | 纤维素 Cellulose | 半纤维素 Hemicellulose |
---|---|---|---|
CK | 14.89±0.10 a | 42.71±0.33 i | 16.73±0.40 a |
1%NaOH-6 h | 10.38±0.46 d | 53.33±1.01 de | 14.26±0.63 d |
3%NaOH-6 h | 12.98±0.13 b | 49.07±2.08 gh | 15.71±0.42 bc |
5%NaOH-6 h | 8.46±0.17 f | 56.49±1.34 bc | 13.31±0.30 e |
7%NaOH-6 h | 5.31±0.07 i | 53.16±1.52 de | 16.26±0.52 ab |
1%NaOH-12 h | 9.65±0.17 e | 52.76±0.34 de | 13.72±0.29 de |
3%NaOH-12 h | 12.43±0.28 c | 48.42±0.70 g | 14.02±0.11 de |
5%NaOH-12 h | 8.63±0.60 f | 57.08±0.09 b | 14.26±0.31 d |
7%NaOH-12 h | 7.54±0.30 g | 52.31±1.23 ef | 15.46±0.46 c |
1%NaOH-24 h | 8.53±0.07 f | 50.69±0.98 fg | 14.33±0.68 d |
3%NaOH-24 h | 9.99±0.29 de | 54.11±0.70 de | 11.66±0.31 f |
5%NaOH-24 h | 8.79±0.41 f | 59.50±1.65 a | 14.09±0.51 de |
7%NaOH-24 h | 6.54±0.39 h | 54.82±0.85 cd | 16.57±0.35 a |
1 | WANG J, LI H R, LI Y H, et al.. Speciation, distribution, and bioavailability of soil selenium in the Tibetan Plateau Kashin-beck disease area—a case study in Songpan county, Sichuan province, China [J]. Biol. Trace Elem. Res., 2013, 156(1-3): 367-375. |
2 | 许砚慧. 青海省青稞产业化开发优势与发展对策[J]. 安徽农业科学, 2016, 44(10): 299-300, 309. |
XU Y H. Development advantages and countermeasures of highland barley industry in Qinghai province [J]. J. Anhui Agric. Sci., 2016, 44(10): 299-300, 309. | |
3 | GASHAW M, DEFAR G. Livestock feed resources, nutritional value and their implication on animal productivity in mixed farming system in Gasera and Ginnir districts, Bale zone, Ethiopia [J]. Int. J. Livestock Prod., 2017, 8(2): 12-23. |
4 | TISMA M, PLANINIC M, BUCIC-KOJIC A, et al.. Corn silage fungal-based solid-state pretreatment for enhanced biogas production in anaerobic co-digestion with cow manure [J]. Bioresour. Technol., 2018, 253: 220-226. |
5 | PENG J J, ABOMOHRA A E, ELSAYED M, et al.. Compositional changes of rice straw fibers after pretreatment with diluted acetic acid: towards enhanced biomethane production [J]. J. Cleaner Prod., 2019, 230: 775-782. |
6 | 罗娟, 赵立欣, 孟海波, 等. NaOH预处理提高甘蔗叶产甲烷性能及其机理分析[J]. 农业工程学报, 2019, 35(24): 262-270. |
LUO J, ZHAO L X, MENG H B, et al.. Improving methane production performance via NaOH pretreatment of sugarcane leaves and its mechanism analysis [J]. Trans. Chin. Soc. Agric. Eng., 2019, 35(24): 262-270. | |
7 | 赵楠, 薛胜荣, 杨改河, 等. 超声联合NaOH预处理小麦秸秆与猪粪混合厌氧发酵特性 [J]. 西北农林科技大学学报(自然科学版), 2019, 47(9): 44-54. |
ZHAO N, XUE S R, YANG G H, et al.. Anaerobic co-digestion characteristics of pig manure and pretreated wheat straw with ultrasonic and NaOH [J]. J. Northwest A&F Univ.(Nat. Sci.), 2019, 47(9): 44-54. | |
8 | 覃国栋, 刘荣厚, 孙辰. NaOH预处理对水稻秸秆沼气发酵的影响[J]. 农业工程学报, 2011, 27(S1): 59-63. |
QIN G D, LIU R H, SUN C. Effects of different concentrations of NaOH pretreatment on anaerobic digestion of rice straw for biogas production [J]. Trans. Chin. Soc. Agric. Eng., 2011, 27(S1): 59-63. | |
9 | ZHU J Y, WAN C X, LI Y B. Enhanced solid-state anaerobic digestion of corn stover by alkaline pretreatment [J]. Bioresour. Technol., 2010, 101(19): 7523-7528. |
10 | LIANG Y G, CHENG B J, SI Y B, et al.. Effect of solid-state NaOH pretreatment on methane production from thermophilic semi-dry anaerobic digestion of rose stalk [J]. Water Sci. Technol., 2016, 73(12): 2913-2920. |
11 | REZAEI M, AMIRI H, SHAFIEI M. Aqueous pretreatment of triticale straw for integrated production of hemicellulosic methane and cellulosic butanol [J]. Renew. Energ., 2021, 171: 971-980. |
12 | 丁绍兰, 蒋术林, 董凌霄, 等. 预处理对麦秆厌氧发酵产气特性的影响[J]. 陕西科技大学学报, 2019, 37(4): 17-22. |
DING S L, JIANG S L, DONG L X, et al.. Effect of pretreatment on gas production characteristics of wheat straw anaerobic fermentation [J]. J. Shaanxi Univ. Sci. Technol., 2019, 37(4): 17-22. | |
13 | LI J H, ZHANG R H, SIDDHU M A H, et al.. Enhancing methane production of corn stover through a novel way: sequent pretreatment of potassium hydroxide and steam explosion [J]. Bioresour. Technol., 2015, 181: 345-350. |
14 | 马瑞洁, 覃国栋, 李坤, 等. NaOH与H2O2综合预处理水稻秸秆及其厌氧发酵产沼气效果研究 [J]. 太阳能学报, 2020, 41(6): 136-142. |
MA R J, QIN G D, LI K, et al.. Effect of NaOH and H2O2 integrated pretreatment of rice straw on its anaerobic fermentation [J]. Acta Energ. Solaris Sin., 2020, 41(6): 136-142. | |
15 | OUAHABI Y R, BENSADOK K, OUAHABI A. Optimization of the biomethane production process by anaerobic digestion of wheat wtraw using chemical pretreatments coupled with ultrasonic disintegration [J/OL]. Sustainability, 2021, 13(13):13137202 [2022-03-13]. . |
16 | SHI Z G, ZHANG L, YUAN H R, et al.. Oyster shells improve anaerobic dark fermentation performances of food waste: hydrogen production, acidification performances, and microbial community characteristics [J/OL]. Bioresour. Technol., 2021, 335: 125268 [2022-03-13]. . |
17 | ERAKY M, JIN K, ZHANG Q G, et al.. Acidogenic biorefinery of rice straw for volatile fatty acids production via sequential two-stage fermentation: effects of pre-treatments [J/OL]. Environ. Technol. Inno., 2021, 23: 101686 [2022-03-13]. . |
18 | 杨斌, 殷引, 张浩博, 等. 洗涤剂法测定烟草及烟草制品中中性洗涤纤维、酸性洗涤纤维、酸性洗涤木质素的研究[J]. 中国烟草学报, 2021, 18(3): 10-15. |
YANG B, YIN Y, ZHANG H B, et al.. Detemination of NDF, ADF and ADL in tobacco and tobacco products with detergent method [J]. Acta Tab. Sin., 2012, 18(3): 10-15. | |
19 | 李轶, 宫兴隆, 郭敬阳, 等. 不同预处理玉米秸秆对猪粪厌氧发酵重金属镉钝化效果[J]. 农业工程学报, 2020, 36(11): 254-260. |
LI Y, GONG X L, GUO J Y, et al.. Effects of various pretreated maize stovers on the passivation of cadmium by anaerobic fermentation of pig manure [J]. Trans. Chin. Soc. Agric. Eng., 2020, 36(11): 254-260. | |
20 | ZHANG X J, ZHANG H L, CHEN Z, et al.. Achieving biogas production and efficient pollutants removal from nitrogenous fertilizer wastewater using combined anaerobic digestion and autotrophic nitrogen removal process [J/OL]. Bioresour. Technol., 2021, 339: 125659 [2022-04-13]. . |
21 | KANG X, SUN Y, LI L, et al.. Improving methane production from anaerobic digestion of pennisetum hybrid by alkaline pretreatment [J]. Bioresour. Technol., 2018, 255: 205-212. |
22 | ANU, KUMAR A, JAIN K K, et al.. Process optimization for chemical pretreatment of rice straw for bioethanol production [J]. Renew. Energ., 2020, 156: 1233-1243. |
23 | IVO A N, LI C, WANG B, et al.. Physio-chemical pretreatments for improved methane potential of Miscanthus lutarioriparius [J]. Fuel, 2016, 166: 29-35. |
24 | 孙嘉臣, 李子富, 朱立新. NaOH和沼液浸泡预处理对麦糠厌氧发酵的强化作用比较[J]. 环境工程技术学报, 2019, 9(5): 603-608. |
SUN J C, LI Z F, ZHU L X. Comparison of enhancements of NaOH and liquid digestate soaking pretreatments for the anaerobic digestion of wheat husk [J]. Environ. Eng. Technol.,2019,9(5): 603-608. | |
25 | 李桃, 王纪坤, 黄宇钊, 等. NaOH预处理对香蕉秸秆厌氧发酵产沼气的影响[J]. 环境工程, 2019, 37(4): 167-171, 152. |
LI T, WANG J K, HUANG Y Z, et al.. Effect of NaOH pretreatment on anaerobic fermentation of Banana straw for biogas production [J]. Environ. Eng., 2019, 37(4): 167-171, 152. | |
26 | 付嘉琦, 夏嵩, 陈小平, 等. 碱预处理稻秆与猪粪混合厌氧发酵特性研究[J]. 农业环境科学学报, 2018, 37(6): 1255-1261. |
FU J Q, XIA S, CHEN X P, et al.. Anaerobic co-digestion of rice straw after alkali pretreatment with pig manure [J]. J. Agro-Environ. Sci., 2018, 37(6): 1255-1261. | |
27 | DENG Y F, QIU Y J, YAO Y Q, et al.. Weak-base pretreatment to increase biomethane production from wheat straw [J]. Environ. Sci. Poll. Res., 2020, 27(30): 1-15. |
28 | LIU R, ZHANG X, SUN W X, et al.. Solid-state KOH pretreatment of corn straw for anaerobic digestion: methane yield enhancement, potassium flow analysis, and preliminary economic assessment [J]. Energ. Fuels, 2019, 33(11): 11034-11040. |
29 | AWORANTI O A, AGARRY S E, OGUNLEYE O O. Biomethanization of the mixture of cattle manure, pig manure and poultry manure in co-digestion with waste peels of pineapple fruit and content of chicken-gizzard-part Ⅱ: optimization of process [J]. Biotechnol. J., 2017, 11: 54-71. |
30 | RAJAGOPAL R, MASSE D I, SINGH G. A critical review on inhibition of anaerobic digestion process by excess ammonia [J]. Bioresour. Technol., 2013, 143: 632-641. |
31 | 李博文, 朱鸿斌, 郭建斌, 等. 鸟粪石沉淀法脱除氨氮对鸡粪厌氧发酵过程的影响[J]. 农业工程学报, 2021, 37(22): 220-225. |
LI B W, ZHU H B, GUO J B, et al.. Effect of ammonia nitrogen removal by struvite precipitation method on the anaerobic digestion of chicken manure [J]. Trans. Chin. Soc. Agric. Eng., 2021, 37(22): 220-225. | |
32 | 蓉倩, 杨力鹏. 褐铁矿强化污泥厌氧发酵及经济分析[J]. 科学技术与工程, 2019, 19(11): 344-349. |
RONG Q, YANG L P. Enhanced anaerobic fermentation of sludge by limoniteand its economic analysis [J]. Sci. Technol. Eng., 2019, 19(11): 344-349. |
[1] | JIAO Jing, ZHENG Yong, LI Zunxiang, HUANG Xiaohong, DU Jihua, ZHENG Jin. JIAO Jing1,2, ZHENG Yong3*, LI Zunxiang1, HUANG Xiaohong1, DU Jihua1, ZHENG Jin1 [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2021, 23(9): 87-95. |
[2] | XIAO Shengling1, JING Yong1,2, FENG Jing2, SHEN Ruixia2*, ZHAO Lixin2, WANG Quanliang1, ZHANG Ying2. Effect of Wood Biochar on the Methane Production Performance of Anaerobic Fermentation [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2021, 23(1): 128-135. |
[3] | SUN Yingcai, DONG Taili*. Land Methane Production Analysis of Energy Maize Under Different Cropping Patterns [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2018, 20(7): 91-97. |
[4] | LIU Xiao-ning, HU Zheng-yi, ZHU Chun-you, WANG Jin-zhi, SHI Yi-chao, HUANG Li-ju. Studies on Technology for Controlling Pollutants from Decentralized Duck Breeding at Islet of Baiyangdian [J]. , 1, 1(1): 132-137. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||