Analysis on Production Technical Efficiency of Mung Bean Industry Under Different Cultivating Scales —Taking Mung Bean Production in Baicheng of Jilin Province as an Example

doi:10.13304/j.nykjdb.2022.0381

Abstract

Abstract:

In 2019， the Central No.1 Document proposed to actively develop the miscellaneous grain and miscellaneous bean industry， vigorously develop the mung bean industry with obvious regional characteristics， which is of great significance for improving the potential of mung bean production， establishing the advantages of characteristic agricultural products， and broadening the channels for farmers to increase income. This study analyzed the status of mung bean industry in China， and then analyzed the comprehensive technical efficiency and its influencing factors of mung bean under different operation scales based on the micro-data of mung bean planting of 233 farmers in Baicheng City of Jilin Province by using the DEA-Tobit two-stage model. The results showed that the average value of comprehensive technical efficiency in the samples was 0.49， and the relationship between comprehensive technical efficiency and operation scale was “inverted U-shaped”. The significant degree of influencing factors of comprehensive technical efficiency varied under different operation scales. Among them， small-scale and medium-scale farmers were more inclined “empirical agriculture” planting mode， while large-scale farmers were more inclined “modern agriculture” planting mode. Based on the above results， some policy suggestions were put forward， such as improving moderate scale management level of mung bean production， moderately strengthening socialized service supply of machinery， and continuously strengthening science and technology training for mung bean farmers.

Key words: different cultivating scale, technical efficiency, influence factor, mung bean farmer

摘要：

2019年中央一号文件提出“要积极发展杂粮杂豆产业，建设特色农产品优势区”，对于提高我国绿豆增产潜力、拓宽农民增收渠道具有重要意义。分析了我国绿豆产业的发展现状，并使用DEA-Tobit两阶段模型，基于吉林省白城市233户农户绿豆种植微观数据，分析了不同经营规模绿豆种植综合技术效率及其影响因素。结果表明，样本中综合技术效率平均值为0.49，综合技术效率与经营规模呈现“倒U型”关系；不同经营规模下综合技术效率影响因素的显著程度不同，其中小规模与中规模农户更倾向于“经验农业”的种植模式，大规模农户更倾向于“现代农业”的种植模式。基于以上结果，提出应提升绿豆生产适度规模化经营水平、适度加强机械社会化服务供给、持续加强对绿豆种植户的科技培训等政策建议。

关键词: 不同经营规模, 技术效率, 影响因素, 绿豆种植户

CLC Number:

S522

Jiliang MA, Huijie ZHANG, Ninghui LI, Huili YUE. Analysis on Production Technical Efficiency of Mung Bean Industry Under Different Cultivating Scales —Taking Mung Bean Production in Baicheng of Jilin Province as an Example[J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2022, 24(8): 9-17.

麻吉亮, 张蕙杰, 李宁辉, 岳慧丽. 不同经营规模下绿豆产业生产技术效率分析——以吉林省白城市绿豆生产为例[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2022, 24(8): 9-17.

Figures/Tables 7

References 15

1	张蕙杰,麻吉亮,岳慧丽,等.中国食用豆产业与发展[M]. 北京:中国农业出版社, 2021:45-51.
2	张蕙杰,郭永田,周俊玲,等. 近年绿豆价格波动的成因分析[J]. 农业经济问题, 2012, 33(4):30-34.
3	柴岩,冯佰利.中国小杂粮产业发展现状及对策[J]. 干旱地区农业研究, 2003, 21(3):145-151.
	CHAI Y, FENG B L. Present situation and developing strategies of minor grain crops in China [J]. Agric. Res. Arid Areas, 2003, 21(3):145-151.
4	李岳云,蓝海涛,方晓军.不同经营规模农户经营行为的研究[J]. 中国农村观察, 1999(4):41-47.
5	屈小博.不同规模农户生产技术效率差异及其影响因素分析——基于超越对数随机前沿生产函数与农户微观数据[J]. 南京农业大学学报(社会科学版), 2009, 9(3):27-35.
	QU X B. Technical efficiency of different farmer sizes and its influencing factors based on stochastic frontier production function and micro-data of households [J]. J. Nanjing Agric. Univ. (Soc. Sci.), 2009, 9(3):27-35.
6	贾琳,夏英. 农户粮食生产规模效率及其影响因素分析——基于黑、豫、川三省玉米种植户的调查数据[J]. 资源科学, 2017, 39(5):924-933.
	JIA L, XIA Y. Scale efficiency of grain production and influencing factors based on survey data from Heilongjiang, Henan and Sichuan [J]. Resour. Sci., 2017, 39(5):924-933.
7	于百复.白城市杂粮产业现状及发展对策[J]. 现代农业科技, 2013(12):303-304.
8	郝曦煜,梁杰,郭文云,等. 白城市特色食用豆产业发展优势分析[J]. 东北农业科学, 2019, 44(01):93-96.
	HAO X Y, LIANG J, GUO W Y, et al.. Analysis of advantages of development of characteristic food legumes industry in Baicheng [J]. J. Northeast Agric. Sci., 2019, 44(01):87-90.
9	赵吉平,王彩萍,侯小峰,等. 山西省小杂粮产业现状及发展对策[J]. 中国种业, 2011(10):16-17.
10	彭宣和.鄂西北绿豆产业现状、存在的问题与发展对策[J]. 湖北农业科学, 2017, 56(12):2209-2211.
	PENG X H. Present situation, problem and developmental strategy of mungbean industry in the northwest of Hubei province [J]. Hubei Agric. Sci., 2017, 56(12):2209-2211.
11	刘慧,李宁辉.小品种农产品价格波动原因的实证分析——基于吉林省白城市绿豆种植户的调查[J]. 农业技术经济, 2014(2):76-84.
12	石晶,李林.基于DEA-Tobit模型的中国棉花生产技术效率分析[J]. 技术经济, 2013, 32(6):79-84.
	SHI J, LI L. Analysis on technical efficiency of China’s cotton production based on DEA-Tobit model [J]. Technol. Econ., 2013, 32(6):79-84.
13	刘颖,金雅,王嫚嫚. 不同经营规模下稻农生产技术效率分析——以江汉平原为例[J]. 华中农业大学学报(社会科学版), 2016(4):15-21.
	LIU Y, JIN Y, WANG M M. Analysis on technical efficiency of rice farmer in different scales: A case study of Jianghan plain [J]. J. Huazhong Agric. Univ. (Soc. Sci. ), 2016(4):15-21.
14	戚焦耳,郭贯成,陈永生.农地流转对农业生产效率的影响研究——基于DEA-Tobit模型的分析[J]. 资源科学, 2015, 37(9):1816-1824.
	QI J E, GUO G C, CHEN Y S. The impact of farmland transfer on agricultural production efficiency based on the DEA-Tobit model [J]. Resour. Sci., 2015, 37(9): 1816-1824.
15	姚增福,刘欣.现代农业全要素生产率分解及空间优化差异——来自湘南农户案例及VRS-DEA模型的实证检验[J]. 经济地理, 2016(12):119-125.
	YAO Z F, LIU X. Research on decomposition and spatial optimization differences of total factor productivity of modern agricultural industry based on area farmers case in southern region and VRS-DEA model empirically test [J]. Econ. Geography, 2016(12):119-125.

指标 Index	第1主成分 First principal component	第2主成分 Second principal component	第3主成分 Third principal component
绿豆种植面积 Mung bean planting area	0.506	-0.391	-0.302
绿豆种植物质投入 Substance input for mung bean planting	0.498	-0.025	-0.025
绿豆种植劳动力投入 Labor input for mung bean planting	0.506	-0.391	-0.391
农户绿豆种植收益 Farmers’ income for mung bean planting	0.490	0.833	0.833

指标 Index	第1主成分 First principal component	第2主成分 Second principal component	第3主成分 Third principal component
绿豆种植面积 Mung bean planting area	0.506	-0.391	-0.302
绿豆种植物质投入 Substance input for mung bean planting	0.498	-0.025	-0.025
绿豆种植劳动力投入 Labor input for mung bean planting	0.506	-0.391	-0.391
农户绿豆种植收益 Farmers’ income for mung bean planting	0.490	0.833	0.833

变量名称 Variable name	变量说明 Variable descriptions	平均值 Average value	标准差 Standard deviation	最小值 Minimum	最大值 Maximum
y：绿豆产量 Mung bean yield	年底绿豆产量 Mung bean yield at the end of the year/kg	2 942.19	4 645.02	100.00	52 000.00
x₁：土地 Land	绿豆播种面积 Mung bean sowing area/ hm²	2.73	3.36	0.13	26.00
x₂：劳动 Labor	自有和雇佣劳动力投入 Owned and employed labor input/d	120.92	148.47	5.90	1 150.50
x₃：种子 Seed	绿豆种子投入/元 Mung bean seeds input/yuan	448.38	777.35	0.00	6 240.00
x₄：农药 Pesticide	防治病虫害、除草剂等投入/元 Mung bean seeds input/yuan	2 331.32	2 799.14	70.00	20 000.00
x₅：化肥 Fertilizer	化肥总投入/元 Total fertilizer input/yuan	891.10	1 171.24	40.00	8 000.00
x₆：机械 Mechanie	雇佣机械或自用燃油费用投入/元 Hire machinery or self-use fuel cost input/yuan	1 970.41	2 874.82	50.00	25 600.00

变量名称 Variable name	变量说明 Variable descriptions	平均值 Average value	标准差 Standard deviation	最小值 Minimum	最大值 Maximum
y：绿豆产量 Mung bean yield	年底绿豆产量 Mung bean yield at the end of the year/kg	2 942.19	4 645.02	100.00	52 000.00
x₁：土地 Land	绿豆播种面积 Mung bean sowing area/ hm²	2.73	3.36	0.13	26.00
x₂：劳动 Labor	自有和雇佣劳动力投入 Owned and employed labor input/d	120.92	148.47	5.90	1 150.50
x₃：种子 Seed	绿豆种子投入/元 Mung bean seeds input/yuan	448.38	777.35	0.00	6 240.00
x₄：农药 Pesticide	防治病虫害、除草剂等投入/元 Mung bean seeds input/yuan	2 331.32	2 799.14	70.00	20 000.00
x₅：化肥 Fertilizer	化肥总投入/元 Total fertilizer input/yuan	891.10	1 171.24	40.00	8 000.00
x₆：机械 Mechanie	雇佣机械或自用燃油费用投入/元 Hire machinery or self-use fuel cost input/yuan	1 970.41	2 874.82	50.00	25 600.00

规模类别 Scale category	样本数量 Sample size	样本平均规模 Average sample size/hm²	综合技术效率 Comprehensive technical efficiency	纯技术效率 Pure technology efficiency	规模效率 Efficiency of scale
小规模 Small-scale	92	0.79	0.48	0.67	0.72
中规模 Medium-scale	59	1.83	0.53	0.62	0.87
大规模 Massive	82	5.56	0.47	0.56	0.89
全样本 Full sample	233	2.73	0.49	0.62	0.82