Bench-scale Study on Operation Effect and Power Generation Performance Treatment of Dairy Farms Wastewater by Microbial Fuel Cell

doi:10.13304/j.nykjdb.2021.0852

Abstract

Abstract:

In order to investigate the feasibility of applying microbial fuel cell （MFC） to dairy farm wastewater treatment technology， a dual-chamber and a single-chamber MFC reaction device were constructed. Dairy farm wastewater was used as the anode reaction liquid， and its electrical performance and degradation effect of main pollutants in sewage were studied. The results showed that both single-chamber and dual-chamber MFC could operate stably with electricity， the average maximum output voltage was 563.8 and 390.8 mV， the maximum power density was 48.5 and 21.7 mW·m^-2， and the apparent internal resistance was 346.4 and 489.5 Ω， respectively， and the single-chamber MFC had better power generation performance than the dual-chamber MFC. The average removal rates of chemical oxygen demand （COD） in daily farm wastewater by single-chamber MFC and dual-chamber MFC were 79.3% and 77.4%， respectively. The average removal rates of total phosphorus （TP）， total nitrogen （TN） and ammonia nitrogen （NH $4 +$ -N） by single-chamber MFC were 70.9%， 65.4% and 78.9%， respectively. The corresponding removal rates were 101.4%， 24.3% and 21.0% higher than those of dual-chamber MFC， respectively， the pollutant removal rate of single-chamber MFC was superior to the dual-chamber MFC. MFC as a new method of wastewater treatment is technical feasibility for dairy wastewater treatment， it can generate electricity while degrading organic matter， nitrogen and phosphorus pollutants in dairy wastewater， and has broad prospects in achieving energy saving， carbon peaking and carbon neutrality.

Key words: microbial fuel cell, electricity production, degradation, dairy sewage, organic matter

摘要：

为探讨微生物燃料电池（microbial fuel cell，MFC）应用于奶牛场污水处理技术的可行性，通过构建双室型和单室型MFC反应装置，以奶牛场污水为阳极反应液，对MFC的产电性能以及污水中主要污染物的降解效果进行研究。结果表明，单室型和双室型MFC均可稳定地产电运行，平均日最大输出电压分别为563.8和390.8 mV，最大功率密度分别为48.5和21.7 mW·m^-2，表观内阻分别为346.4和489.5 Ω，且单室型MFC产电性能优于双室型；单室型和双室型MFC对奶牛场污水中化学需氧量（chemical oxygen demand，COD）的平均去除率分别为79.3%和77.4%；单室型MFC对总磷（total phosphorus，TP）、总氮（total nitrogen，TN）和氨氮（ammonia nitrogen，NH $4 +$ -N）的平均去除率分别为70.9%、65.4%和78.9%，分别比双室型MFC相应去除率高101.4%、24.3%和21.0%，单室型MFC对污染物去除率优于双室型MFC。MFC作为一种污水处理新方法，用于奶牛场污水处理具有技术可行性，其在降解奶牛场污水中有机物和氮磷污染物的同时能够产生电能，在实现节能减排、碳达峰和碳中和方面具有广阔前景。

关键词: 微生物燃料电池, 产电, 降解, 奶牛场污水, 有机物

CLC Number:

X713

Lu LIU, Xiuping TAO, Jianchao SONG, Bin SHANG, Wenqian XU, Hongmin DONG, Yangyang CAI. Bench-scale Study on Operation Effect and Power Generation Performance Treatment of Dairy Farms Wastewater by Microbial Fuel Cell[J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2022, 24(4): 134-143.

刘璐, 陶秀萍, 宋建超, 尚斌, 徐文倩, 董红敏, 蔡阳扬. 微生物燃料电池处理奶牛场污水运行效果与产电性能试验研究[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2022, 24(4): 134-143.

Figures/Tables 8

Fig.1 Structure of microbial fuel cell reactor

Table 1 Inlet water quality characteristics of microbial fuel cell

化学需氧量

Chemical oxygen demand/（mg·L ^-1 ）

总磷

Total phosphorus/（mg·L ^-1 ）

总氮

Total nitrogen/ （mg·L ^-1 ）

氨氮

Ammonia nitrogen/（mg·L ^-1 ）

电导率

Conductivity value/ （μS·cm^-1）

Fig.2 Profile of daily maximum output voltage and water temperature during experimental period

Fig.3 Polarization curve and Power density curve

Fig.4 Content of contaminants in MFC anode reaction solution

Table 2 Average effluent water removal rate of MFC

MFC反应器腔室

MFC reactor chamber

COD

4 +

-N

双室型MFC

Dual-chamber MFC

单室型MFC

Single-chamber MFC

Table 2 Average effluent water removal rate of MFC

MFC反应器腔室

MFC reactor chamber

COD

4 +

-N

双室型MFC

Dual-chamber MFC

77.4±1.8 a

35.2±15.8 b

51.8±4.1 b

65.2±2.1 b

单室型MFC

Single-chamber MFC

79.3±2.0 a

70.9±5.2 a

65.4±1.5 a

78.9±1.2 a

Fig.5 Changes in pH during MFC operation

Table 3 Profile of Coulomb efficiency during test time

MFC反应器腔室

MFC reactor chamber

平均值

Average value

双室型MFC

Dual-chamber MFC

单室型MFC

Single-chamber MFC

References 42

1	生态环境部,国家统计局,农业农村部. 第二次全国污染源普查公报[EB/OL].(2020-06-08) [2021-12-07]. .
2	李萌.基于比较优势理论的中国奶牛养殖产业布局研究[D].哈尔滨:东北农业大学, 2019.
	LI M. Industrial layout reserch of chinese dairy farming based on comparative advantage theory [D]. Harbin: Northeast Agricultural University, 2019.
3	宋建超.基于絮凝预处理的膜生物反应器处理奶牛场高浓度污水中试试验研究[D].北京:中国农业科学院, 2021.
	SONG J C. Pilot study on membrane bioreactor treating high-strength dairy farm wastewater based on flocculation pretreatment [D]. Beijing: Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, 2021.
4	杨培媛,尚斌,温富勇,等.奶牛场高浓度污水的絮凝预处理效果研究[J].中国农业科技导报,2018,20(5):132-139.
	YANG P Y, SHANG B, WEN F Y, et al.. Influences of flocculation on wastewater with high concentration pollutants from dairy cattle farm [J]. J. Agr. Sci. Tech., 2018, 20(5): 132-139.
5	宋建超,尚斌,温富勇,等.奶牛场高浓度污水絮凝处理中试效果研究[J].畜牧与兽医,2021,53(4):48-53.
	SONG J C, SHANG B, WEN F Y, et al.. A pilot study of pretreating highstrength wastewater from a dairy farm by flocculation [J]. Anim. Husb. Vet. Med., 2021, 53(4): 48-53.
6	郭江鹏,周化斌,姜小伟,等.连续回分式活性污泥处理工艺在奶牛养殖废水治理中的应用[J].家畜生态学报, 2020,41(4):69-73.
	GUO J P, ZHOU H B, JIANG X W, et al.. Application of continuous recycling activated sludge treatment technology in dairy cattle farm [J]. Acta Ecol. Anim. Dom., 2020, 41(4): 69-73.
7	王兆凯,许光宇,纪荣平.EGSB预处理奶牛养殖废水的效能研究[J].水处理技术,2020,46(5):121-125, 128.
	WANG Z K, XU G Y, JI R P. Application of membrane-based salt separation and concentration in chloro-alkali wastewater treatment [J]. Tech. Water Treat., 2020, 46(5): 121-125, 128.
8	杨培媛.膜生物反应器处理奶牛场污水效果研究[D].北京:中国农业科学院,2019.
	YANG P Y. The performance of membrane bioreactor treating wastewater from dairy farm [D]. Beijing: Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, 2019.
9	卢健.奶牛场排泄物产生、收集、堆积及处理过程中氮、磷变化研究[D].南京:南京农业大学,2013.
	LU J. Changes in nitrogen and phosphorus of dairy cow excreta during generation, collection, stacking and treatment process [D]. Nanjing: Nanjing Agricultural University, 2003.
10	龚诣,吴洁,苏衍菁,等.规模化奶牛场废水处理技术研究进展[J].中国奶牛,2018(8):64-67.
	GONG Y, WU J, SU Y J, et al.. Research progress of dairy farm wastewater treatment technology [J]. China Dairy Cattle, 2018(8): 64-67.
11	税勇,川岸朋树,宋小燕,等.两种膜生物反应器处理养猪沼液的比较研究[J].环境科学,2015,36(9):3319-3328.
	SHUI Y, KAWAGISHI T, SONG X Y, et al.. A comparative study on two membrane bioreactors for the treatment of digested piggery wastewater [J]. Environ. Sci., 2015, 36(9): 3319-3328.
12	KUMAR S S, KUMAR V, MALYAN S K, et al.. Microbial fuel cells (MFCs) for bioelectrochemical treatment of different wastewater streams [J/OL]. Fuel, 2019, 254: 115526 [2021-12-07]. .
13	KUMAR G, BAKONYI P, KOBAYASHI T, et al.. Enhancement of biofuel production via microbial augmentation: the case of dark fermentative hydrogen [J]. Renew Sustain Energy Rev., 2016, 57: 879-891.
14	YE Y Y, NGO H H, GUO W S, et al.. Effect of organic loading rate on the recovery of nutrients and energy in a dual -chamber microbial fuel cell [J]. Bioresour. Technol., 2019, 281: 367-373[2021-12-07]. .
15	TAMÁS R, LÁSZLÓ K, PÉTER B, et al.. Municipal waste liquor treatment via bioelectrochemical and fermentation (H₂+CH₄) processes: assessment of various technological sequences [J]. Chemosphere, 2017(171): 692-701.
16	FIRDOUS S, JIN W, SHAHID N, et al.. The performance of microbial fuel cells treating vegetable oil industrial wastewater [J/OL]. Environ. Tech. Innov., 2018, 10:143-151[2021-12-07]. .
17	JAGDEEP K N, AMIT, UTTAM K G. An innovative mixotrophic approach of distillery spent wash with sewage wastewater for biodegradation and bioelectricity generation using microbial fuel cell [J]. J. Water Process Eng., 2018, 23: 306-313.
18	陈翔,胡春光,沈建国,等.不同电子受体对牛粪微生物燃料电池性能的影响研究[J].水处理技术,2020,46(3):76-79.
	CHEN X, HU C G, SHEN J G, et al.. Effect of different electron acceptors on the electricity generation performance of dairymanure fermentation [J]. Tech. Water Treat., 2020, 46(3): 76-79.
19	PARK Y, PARK S, NGUYEN V K, et al.. Complete nitrogen removal by simultaneous nitrification and denitrification in flat-panel air-cathode microbial fuel cells treating domestic wastewater [J/OL]. Chem. Eng. J., 2017, 316: 673-679[2021-12-07]. .
20	HWANG J H, KIM K Y, RESURRECCION E P, et al.. Surfactant addition to enhance bioavailability of bilge water in single chamber microbial fuel cells (MFCs)[J]. J. Hazard. Mater., 2019, 368: 732-738.
21	李小虎,朱能武,李冲,等.以养殖废水为底料的微生物燃料电池产电性能与水质净化效果[J].环境工程学报,2012,6(7):2189-2194.
	LI X H, ZHU N W, LI C, et al.. Electricity generation and treatment of swine wastewater using microbial fuel cells [J]. Chin J. Environ. Eng., 2012, 6(7):2189-2194.
22	KENGO I, TOSHIHIRO I, YOSHIHIRO K, et al.. Electricity generation from cattle manure slurry by cassette-electrode microbial fuel cells [J]. J. Biosci. Bioeng., 2013, 116(5): 610-615.
23	曹琳,雍晓雨,周俊,等.以沼液为原料的微生物燃料电池产电降解特性[J].化工学报,2014,65(5):1900-1905.
	CAO L, YONG X Y, ZHOU J, et al.. Electrical and degradation characteristics of microbial fuel cell using biogas slurry as substrate [J]. CEISC J., 2014, 65(5): 1900-1905.
24	PENG L, RUI D, YONG J, et al.. One-year operation of 1000-L modularized microbial fuel cell for municipal wastewater treatment [J/OL]. Water, 2018, 141:1-8[2021-12-07]. .
25	XAVIER A W, IRENE M J, JOHN G, et al.. Pee power urinalⅡurinal scale-up with microbial fuel cell scale-down for improved lighting [J]. J. Power Sources, 2018, 392: 150-158.
26	TAMILARASAN K, BANU J R, JAYASHREE C, et al.. Effect of organic loading rate on electricity generating potential of upflow anaerobic microbial fuel cell treating surgical cotton industry wastewater [J]. J. Environ. Chem. Eng., 2017, 5(1): 1021-1026.
27	LÁSZLÓ K, TAMÁS R, NÁNDOR N, et al.. Bioelectrochemical treatment of municipal waste liquor in microbial fuel cells for energy valorization [J]. J. Cleaner Prod., 2016, 112: 4406-4412.
28	丘通强,马双念,毛星晨,等.奶牛养殖废水处理技术现状及进展[J].广东化工, 2021,48(10):137-139.
	QIU T Q, MA S N, MAO X C, et al.. Status and progress of wastewater treatment technology for dairy farming wastewater [J]. Guangdong Chem. Ind., 2021, 48(10): 137-139.
29	叶晔捷,宋天顺,徐源,等.微生物燃料电池产电的影响因素[J].过程工程学报,2009,9(3):526-530.
	YE Y J, SONG T S, XU Y, et al.. Investigation on influential factors in electricity generation of microbial fuel cell [J]. China. J. Process Eng., 2009, 9(3): 526-530.
30	廖源.单室无膜空气阴极微生物燃料电池处理垃圾渗滤液的影响因素研究[D].安徽淮南:安徽理工大学,2019.
	LIAO Y. Study on the factors influencing the treatment of landfill leachate by single-chamber air-cathode microbial fuel cells [D]. Anhui Huainan: Anhui University of Science and Technology, 2019.
31	LOGAN B E.微生物燃料电池[M].冯玉杰,王鑫,译.北京:化学工业出版社, 2009,13-103.
32	KIM J R, DEC J, BRUNS M A, et al.. Removal of odors from Swine wastewater by using microbial fuel cells [J]. Appl. Environ. Microbiol., 2008, 74(8): 2540-2543.
33	冯雅丽,毕耜超,李浩然,等.单室无膜空气阴极微生物燃料电池处理沼液的研究[J].高校化学工程学报,2013,27(5):889-895.
	FENG Y L, BI S C, LI H R, et al.. Treatment of biogas slurry using membrane-less air cathode single-chamber microbial fuel cells [J]. J. Chem. Eng. Chinese Univ., 2013, 27(5): 889-895.
34	王芳,张德俐,陈梅,等.沼液微生物燃料电池的产电及有机物降解特性研究[J].农业工程学报,2019,35(9):206-213.
	WANG F, ZHANG D L, CHEN M, et al.. Power generation and organic degradation performance of microbial fuel cell with biogas slurry [J]. Trans. Chin Sci. Agr. Eng., 2019, 35(9): 206-213.
35	KIM B H, CHANG I S, GADD G M. Challenges in microbial fuel cell developmentand operation[J/OL]. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol., 2007, 76(3): 485-494 [2021-12-07]. .
36	吴义诚,王泽杰,刘利丹,等.利用光微生物燃料电池实现养猪废水资源化利用研究[J].环境科学学报,2015,35(2):456-460.
	WU Y C, WANG Z J, LIU L D, et al..Resource recovery of swine wastewater using photo microbial fuel cells [J]. Acta Sci. Circ., 2015, 35(2): 456-460.
37	顾冬燕,贾红华,伍元东,等.利用微生物燃料电池同步降解沼液和三苯基氯化锡[J].化工学报,2016,67(5):2056-2063.
	GU D Y, JIA H H, WU Y D, et al.. Synchronously degradation of biogas slurry and triphenyltin chloride in microbial fuel cell [J]. CIESC J., 2016, 67(5): 2056-2063.
38	DU Z, LI H, GU T. A state of the art review on microbial fuel cells: A promising technology for wastewater treatment and bioenergy [J/OL]. Biotechnol. Adv., 2007, 25(5): 464-482 [2021-12-07]. .
39	SARATALE R G, SARATALE G D, PUGAZHENDHI A, et al.. Microbiome involved in microbial electrochemical systems (MESs): a review[J]. Chemosphere, 2017, 177: 176-188.
40	董恒.基于活性炭的低成本,高性能微生物燃料电池空气阴极研究[D].天津:南开大学, 2013.
	DONG H. Study on low cost and high performance air cathode basing on activated carbon in microbial fuel cells [D]. Tianjin: Nankai University, 2013.
41	杨利伟,龙朋成,李德溢,等.小球藻生物阴极MFC处理养猪废水及产电性能[J].中国给水排水,2019,35(11):1-8.
	YANG L W, LONG P C, LI D Y, et al.. Electricity generation performance and treatment of swine wastewater by chlorella biocathode microbial fuel cell [J]. China Water Wastewater, 2019, 35(11): 1-8.
42	XIA T, ZHANG X L, WANG H M, et al.. Power generation and microbial community analysis in microbial fuel cells: a promising system to treat organic acid fermentation wastewater [J/OL]. Bioresour. Tech., 2019, 284: 72-79[2021-12-07]. .

[1]	LI Guowei1, HE Jing1, GUO Kunjie1, JIRIMUTU1,2*. Screening of Cellulose-degrading Bacteria from Bactrian Camel and Their Degradation Effect on Distillers Grains [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2021, 23(4): 64-75.
[2]	YANG Mengya1, YAN Feifan1, YAN Meichao1, WANG He1, PIAO Renzhe1, CUI Zongjun2, ZHAO Hongyan1*. Decomposition Characteristics of Corn Stover by Microbial Consortium PLC-8 with Lignocellulose-degradation at Low Temperature [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2021, 23(1): 73-81.
[3]	GUO Han1, ZHANG Xu1*, LU Zhou2, TIAN Ting3, XU Feifei2,LUO Ming2, WU Zhenggui3, SUN Zhenjun5. Estimation of Organic Matter Content in Southern Paddy Soil Based on Airborne Hyperspectral Images [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2020, 22(6): 60-71.
[4]	CHENG Jiehong1, CHEN Zhengguang1*, ZHANG Qinghua2. Comparison of Different Wavelength Selection Methods in SOM Content Detection [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2020, 22(1): 162-170.
[5]	LIU Yang1, WANG Wei1, ZHU Xuran1, ZHANG Jiaxiao1, LIU Yuan1,2, WANG Jian1,2*. Study on Residue and Degradation Dynamics of Dimethomorph in Potato and Its Soil [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2019, 21(9): 104-110.
[6]	WANG Wei1, ZHENG Dahao1, YANG Chaobo2, LI Yong1, WANG Wei1, LI Xiying1,3*. Isolation of High Efficient Cellulose Decomposing Bacteria and Biological Effects on Straw Degradation [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2019, 21(8): 36-46.
[7]	YANG Chaoyuan, LIU Guotao*, LI Weiyu, LI Lei, XIA Xuan, LI Shibo. Research on Lignin Degradation and Humus Formation During Composting [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2019, 21(2): 148-154.
[8]	ZHU Xi1, LIN Jie2*. Soil Erosion and Soil Nutrients Response to Erosion Based on 137Cs in Southern Hilly Area [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2018, 20(8): 134-141.
[9]	LIN Lihua, ZHI Huyu. Influence of Silkworm Excrement Soil Amendments on Acidic Soil and Growth of Vigna unguiculata [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2018, 20(4): 108-114.
[10]	BIAN Chenkai, ZHANG Yu, CHEN Duyu, WANG Sen, XU Lei*. Cloning and Functional Studies of Carbazole Degradation Gene carB from Sphingosinicella sp. Strain B1 [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2018, 20(2): 56-64.
[11]	WANG Chunyan1, HU Tanglu1, JIANG Feng2, TAN Weiming1, DUAN Liusheng1*. Effects of Environmental Factors on Coronatine Stability in Aqueous Solution [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2018, 20(2): 116-121.
[12]	TANG Jie, WANG Changquan*, LI Bing, ZENG Jian, LI Qiquan, XU Qiang, LI Yiding, LI Shan. Spatial Variability and Its influencing Factors of Soil Organic Matter and Alkaline Nitrogen in Central Hilly Area of Sichuan [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2017, 19(6): 124-130.
[13]	BIAN Chenkai, ZHANG Yu, CHEN Duyu, XU Lei*. Identification and Characterization of a Carbazole-Degrading Bacterial Strain [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2017, 19(5): 51-59.
[14]	DENG Na-na1,2, LUO Di1, ZHONG Juan1,2, ZHOU Jin-yan1,TAN Hong1*. Identification and Degradation Optimization of a High Nicotine Endurance Strain Arthrobacter sp. AH14 [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2016, 18(5): 62-71.
[15]	FENG Meng-ge1, WEI Qi-xin1, SUN Jian-xia2, LU Jun-li1, ZHU Cui-juan1, . Studies on Degradation Mechanism of Zeaxanthin Processed by Ultrasonic [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2016, 18(2): 110-114.