Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology ›› 2024, Vol. 26 ›› Issue (1): 193-200.DOI: 10.13304/j.nykjdb.2022.1046
• BIO-MANUFACTURING & RESOURCE AND ECOLOGY • Previous Articles
Ting ZENG1(), Meng HOU2, Yao WANG2, Bo PENG1, Boyu TANG1, Xiaorui ZHAO2, Yueyu SUI2, Xiaoguang JIAO1(
)
Received:
2022-11-30
Accepted:
2023-03-20
Online:
2024-01-15
Published:
2024-01-08
Contact:
Xiaoguang JIAO
曾婷1(), 侯萌2, 王耀2, 彭博1, 汤博宇1, 赵晓蕊2, 隋跃宇2, 焦晓光1(
)
通讯作者:
焦晓光
作者简介:
曾婷 E-mail:522483255@qq.com;
基金资助:
CLC Number:
Ting ZENG, Meng HOU, Yao WANG, Bo PENG, Boyu TANG, Xiaorui ZHAO, Yueyu SUI, Xiaoguang JIAO. Effects of Different Land Use Types on Soil Cellulase Activity and Fertility Factors[J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2024, 26(1): 193-200.
曾婷, 侯萌, 王耀, 彭博, 汤博宇, 赵晓蕊, 隋跃宇, 焦晓光. 不同土地利用类型对土壤纤维素酶活性及肥力因子的影响[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2024, 26(1): 193-200.
Fig. 2 SCA and soil fertility of dry land and forest landNote: ** and *** indicate significant differences at P<0.01 and P<0.001 levels, respectively.
指标 Index | 土地利用类型 Land use type | 最小值 Minimum | 最大值 Maximum | 均值 Mean | 标准差 SD | 变异系数 CV/% |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
pH | 旱地DL | 5.81 | 7.13 | 6.30 A | 0.29 | 4.7 |
有林地FL | 5.31 | 6.87 | 5.85 B | 0.48 | 8.2 | |
有机碳SOC/(g·kg-1) | 旱地DL | 19.42 | 50.23 | 27.83 A | 6.81 | 24.5 |
有林地FL | 23.50 | 75.89 | 45.47 C | 19.38 | 42.6 | |
全氮TN/(g·kg-1) | 旱地DL | 1.60 | 4.70 | 2.44 A | 0.60 | 24.4 |
有林地FL | 1.96 | 7.86 | 4.04 C | 1.93 | 47.8 | |
全磷TP/(g·kg-1) | 旱地DL | 0.26 | 1.10 | 0.73 A | 0.21 | 29.2 |
有林地FL | 0.46 | 1.52 | 0.99 B | 0.34 | 34.5 | |
含水率SMC/(%) | 旱地DL | 24.22 | 43.02 | 32.17 A | 5.12 | 15.9 |
有林地FL | 34.31 | 88.58 | 51.48 B | 21.87 | 42.5 | |
土壤纤维素酶活性SCA/(mg·g-1·d-1) | 旱地DL | 3.68 | 23.57 | 9.56 A | 4.97 | 51.9 |
有林地FL | 4.19 | 49.97 | 18.01 C | 13.54 | 75.2 |
Table 1 Descriptive correlation parameters between SCA and soil fertility factorss of different land use types
指标 Index | 土地利用类型 Land use type | 最小值 Minimum | 最大值 Maximum | 均值 Mean | 标准差 SD | 变异系数 CV/% |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
pH | 旱地DL | 5.81 | 7.13 | 6.30 A | 0.29 | 4.7 |
有林地FL | 5.31 | 6.87 | 5.85 B | 0.48 | 8.2 | |
有机碳SOC/(g·kg-1) | 旱地DL | 19.42 | 50.23 | 27.83 A | 6.81 | 24.5 |
有林地FL | 23.50 | 75.89 | 45.47 C | 19.38 | 42.6 | |
全氮TN/(g·kg-1) | 旱地DL | 1.60 | 4.70 | 2.44 A | 0.60 | 24.4 |
有林地FL | 1.96 | 7.86 | 4.04 C | 1.93 | 47.8 | |
全磷TP/(g·kg-1) | 旱地DL | 0.26 | 1.10 | 0.73 A | 0.21 | 29.2 |
有林地FL | 0.46 | 1.52 | 0.99 B | 0.34 | 34.5 | |
含水率SMC/(%) | 旱地DL | 24.22 | 43.02 | 32.17 A | 5.12 | 15.9 |
有林地FL | 34.31 | 88.58 | 51.48 B | 21.87 | 42.5 | |
土壤纤维素酶活性SCA/(mg·g-1·d-1) | 旱地DL | 3.68 | 23.57 | 9.56 A | 4.97 | 51.9 |
有林地FL | 4.19 | 49.97 | 18.01 C | 13.54 | 75.2 |
Fig. 3 Correlation between SCA and soil fertility factorssNote: pH—Soil acidity and alkalinity;SOC—Soil organic carbon content;TN—Total nitrogen content;TP—Total phosphorus content;SMC—Soil moisture content;SCA—Soil cellulase activity. *and ** indicate significant correlations at P<0.05 and P<0.01 levels, respectively.
Fig. 4 Path analysis of SCA activity and soil fertility factors in dry land and forest landNote: The solid line is the direct path and the dotted line is the indirect path.
土地利用类型 Land use type | x:养分因子 Nutrient factor | y | 线性回归方程 Linear regression | R2 |
---|---|---|---|---|
旱地DL | pH | 土壤纤维素酶活性 SCA | y=-6.15x+48.32 | 0.13 |
土壤有机碳含量SOC | y=-0.29x+17.61 | 0.16 | ||
全氮含量TN | y=-3.55x+18.23 | 0.18 | ||
全磷含量TP | y=-6.00x+13.93 | 0.07 | ||
土壤含水率SMC | y=-0.15x+14.36 | 0.02 | ||
有林地FL | pH | y=-8.54x+67.95 | 0.09 | |
土壤有机碳含量SOC | y=0.54x-6.45 | 0.59 | ||
全氮含量TN | y=4.55x-0.37 | 0.42 | ||
全磷含量TP | y=19.93x-1.72 | 0.25 | ||
土壤含水率SMC | y=0.51x-8.16 | 0.67 |
Table 2 Linear regression of SCA and soil fertility factorss in different land use types
土地利用类型 Land use type | x:养分因子 Nutrient factor | y | 线性回归方程 Linear regression | R2 |
---|---|---|---|---|
旱地DL | pH | 土壤纤维素酶活性 SCA | y=-6.15x+48.32 | 0.13 |
土壤有机碳含量SOC | y=-0.29x+17.61 | 0.16 | ||
全氮含量TN | y=-3.55x+18.23 | 0.18 | ||
全磷含量TP | y=-6.00x+13.93 | 0.07 | ||
土壤含水率SMC | y=-0.15x+14.36 | 0.02 | ||
有林地FL | pH | y=-8.54x+67.95 | 0.09 | |
土壤有机碳含量SOC | y=0.54x-6.45 | 0.59 | ||
全氮含量TN | y=4.55x-0.37 | 0.42 | ||
全磷含量TP | y=19.93x-1.72 | 0.25 | ||
土壤含水率SMC | y=0.51x-8.16 | 0.67 |
1 | YANG S, YAO F, YE J, et al.. Latitudinal pattern of soil lignin/cellulose content and the activity of their degrading enzymes across a temperate forest ecosystem [J]. Ecol. Indicators, 2019, 102:557-568. |
2 | XIAO Y, HUANG Z G, LU X G, et al.. Changes of soil labile organic carbon fractions and their relation to soil microbial characteristics in four typical wetlands of Sanjiang plain, northeast China [J]. Ecol. Eng., 2015, 82:381-389. |
3 | XU M P, LIU H Y, ZHANG Q, et al.. Effect of forest thinning on soil organic carbon stocks from the perspective of carbon-degrading enzymes [J/OL]. Catena, 2022, 218:106560 [2022-10-20]. . |
4 | LIU L, HUANG W C, LIU Y, et al.. Diversity of cellulolytic microorganisms and microbial cellulases [J/OL]. Int. Biodeterioration Biodegradation, 2021, 163(3):105277 [2022-10-20]. . |
5 | 贺美,王立刚,王迎春,等.黑土活性有机碳库与土壤酶活性对玉米秸秆还田的响应[J].农业环境科学学报,2018,37(9):1942-1951. |
HE M, WANG L G, WANG Y C, et al.. Response of the active carbon pool and enzymatic activity of soils to maize straw returning [J]. J. Agro-Environ. Sci., 2018, 37(9):1942-1951. | |
6 | 李欣,陈小华,顾海蓉,等.典型农田土壤酶活性分布特征及影响因素分析[J].生态环境学报,2021,30(8):1634-1641. |
LI X, CHEN X H, GU H R, et al.. Distribution characteristics and influencing factors of enzyme activities in typical farmland soils [J]. Ecol. Environ., 2021, 30(8):1634-1641. | |
7 | 周际海,郜茹茹,魏倩,等.旱地红壤不同土地利用方式对土壤酶活性及微生物多样性的影响差异[J]. 水土保持学报, 2020, 34(1): 327-332. |
ZHOU J H, GAO R R, WEI Q, et al.. Effects of different land use patterns on enzyme activities and microbial diversityin upland red soil [J]. J. Soil Water Conserv., 2020, 34(1):327-332. | |
8 | 万盼,胡艳波,张弓乔,等.2种不同土地利用方式对山麓耕地土壤养分的影响[J].中南林业科技大学学报,2019,39(1):8-14. |
WAN P, HU Y B, ZHANG G Q, et al.. Effects of two land use types on soil nutrients of piedmont arable land in south-eastern part of Gansu province [J]. J. Central South Univ. For. Tech., 2019, 39(1):8-14. | |
9 | 王玉博,赵光影,臧淑英,等.人为干扰对小兴安岭森林湿地土壤碳组分和酶活性的影响[J].环境科学学报,2017,37(12):4757-4764. |
WANG Y B, ZHAO G Y, ZANG S Y, et al.. Effects of human disturbance on soil carbon fractions and enzyme activities in forest wetlands of Xiaoxing'an Mountains [J]. Acta Sci. Circumstantiae, 2017, 37(12):4757-4764. | |
10 | YAO Z A, HMA B, YXA B, et al.. Assessment of soil quality indexes for different land use types in typical steppe in the Loess hilly area, China [J/OL]. Ecol. Indicators, 2020, 118:106743 [2022-10-20]. . |
11 | 刘文哲,任禾.我国黑土地保护工程对策浅议[J].吉林农业, 2019(24):72. |
12 | 施林林.水稻土与旱地土壤酶活性和有机质FT-IR特征比较研究[D].扬州:扬州大学,2007. |
SHI L L. Comparative study on enzyme activity and FT-IR characteristics of organic matter in paddy soil and dryland soil [D]. Yangzhou: Yangzhou University, 2007. | |
13 | QUAN L, SONG X Z, LV J H, et al.. Biochar mitigates the effect of nitrogen deposition on soil bacterial community composition and enzyme activities in a Torreya grandis orchard [J/OL]. Forest Ecol. Manage., 2020, 457:117717 [2022-10-20]. . |
14 | 余高,陈芬,谢英荷,等.有机-无机复合保水材料对旱地麦田土壤水分及酶活性的影响[J].节水灌溉,2018(10):9-13. |
YU G, CHEN F, XIE Y H, et al.. Effects of organic-inorganic superabsorbent polymer composites on soil water and enzyme activities in dryland wheat fields [J]. Water Sav. Irrig., 2018(10):9-13. | |
15 | XU M, XU L J, FANG H J, et al.. Alteration in enzymatic stoichiometry controls the response of soil organic carbon dynamic to nitrogen and water addition in temperate cultivated grassland [J/OL]. Eur. J. Soil Biol., 2020, 101:103248 [2022-10-20]. . |
16 | HEROLD N, SCHÖNING I, BERNER D, et al.. Vertical gradients of potential enzyme activities in soil profiles of European beech, Norway spruce and Scots pine dominated forest sites [J]. Pedobiologia, 2014, 57(3):181-189. |
17 | BHATTACHAYYA R, RABBI S M F, ZHANG Y Q, et al.. Soil organic carbon is significantly associated with the pore geometry, microbial diversity and enzyme activity of the macro-aggregates under different land uses [J/OL]. Sci. Total Environ., 2021, 778: 146286 [2022-10-20]. . |
18 | GUAN P T, YANG J J, YANG Y R, et al.. Land conversion from cropland to grassland alleviates climate warming effects on nutrient limitation: evidence from soil enzymatic activity and stoichiometry [J/OL]. Glob. Ecol. Conserv., 2020, 24:e01328 [2022-10-20]. . |
19 | MERLOTI L F, PEDRINHO A, MENDES L W, et al.. Long-term land use in Amazon influence the dynamic of microbial communities in soil and rhizosphere [J/OL]. Rhizosphere, 2022, 21:100482 [2022-10-20]. . |
20 | 鲍士旦.土壤农化分析[M].第3版.北京:中国农业出版社,2000:86-115. |
21 | 陈琳.沈北新区不同用地类型土壤酶活性及其影响因素研究[D].沈阳:沈阳大学,2017. |
CHEN L. Soil Enzyme activities and their influencing factors in different land types in Shenbei New district [D]. Shenyang: Shenyang University, 2017. | |
22 | WU Z X, JIN L, YUAN C, et al.. Effects of different factors on leaf litter decomposition in rubber plantations in Danzhou, South China [J/OL]. J. Rubber Res., 2021(5):24 [2022-10-20]. . |
23 | 傅庆洲,张文昌,梁栋,等.叶片凋落物不同分解方式对林地土壤纤维素酶活性的影响[J].河北林业科技,2018(3):9-14. |
FU Q Z, ZHANG W C, LIANG D, et al.. Impacts of leaf litter decomposition patterns on the forest soil cellulose enzyme activity [J]. Hebei For. Sci. Tech., 2018(3):9-14. | |
24 | 李胜龙,李和平,林艺,等.东北地区不同耕作方式农田土壤风蚀特征[J].水土保持学报,2019,33(4):110-118, . |
LI S L, LI H P, LIN Y, et al.. Effects of tillage methods on wind erosion in farmland of Northeastern China [J]. J. Soil Water Conserv., 2019, 33(4):110-118. | |
25 | NATHAN O O, MONICAH M M, JAYNE M N, et al.. Nutrient and organic carbon losses by erosion, and their economic and environmental implications in the drylands of Kenya [J/OL]. Environ. Challenges, 2022, 7(4):100519 [2022-10-20]. . |
26 | 董明哲,陈香碧,冯书珍,等.红壤丘陵区典型农田土壤秸秆还田后纤维素降解特征及其影响因素[J].生态学杂志,2016,35(7):1834-1841. |
DONG M Z, CHEN X B, FENG S Z, et al.. Characteristics of cellulose degradation after straw return and its influence factors in arable lands in red soil hilly region [J]. Chin. J. Ecol., 2016, 35(7):1834-1841. | |
27 | BURNS R G, DEFOREST J L, MARXSEN J, et al.. Soil enzymes in a changing environment: current knowledge and future directions [J]. Soil Boil. Biochem., 2013, 58:216-234. |
28 | 薛萐,李占斌,拳鹏,等.不同土地利用方式对干热河谷地区土壤酶活性的影响[J].中国农业科学,2011,44(18):3768-3777. |
XUE S, LI Z B, QUAN P, et al.. Effect of land use on soil enzyme activity in Dry-Hot Vally [J]. Sci. Agric. Sin., 2011, 44(18):3768-3777. | |
29 | 韩玮,何明,杨再强.添加外源纤维素酶对水稻秸秆模拟堆肥过程的影响[J].环境工程学报,2014,8(11):4955-4962. |
HAN W, HE M, YANG Z Q. Effects of exogenous cellulase on simulated composting of rice straw [J]. J. Environ. Eng., 2014, 8(11):4955-4962. | |
30 | 袁颖红,张文锋,周际海,等.改良剂对旱地红壤活性有机碳及土壤酶活性的影响[J].土壤,2017,49(5):909-918. |
YUAN Y H, ZHANG W F, ZHOU J H, et al.. Effects of amendments on labile organic carbon and soil enzymes activities in upland red soil [J]. Soils, 2017, 49(5):909-918. |
[1] | Xiaohu YANG, Manyu ZHANG, Haichang YANG, Fenghua ZHANG, Yilin JIANG, Xiaolan YI. Inversion of Soil Salinity in Farmland of Manas River Basin Based on Combined Model [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2023, 25(1): 134-141. |
[2] | Lijuan HE, Zhongju MENG, Xiaohong DANG, Tao LYU. Effects of Planting Glycyrrhizauralensis on Mechanical Composition and Nutrients of Aeolian Sandy Soil [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2022, 24(2): 169-176. |
[3] | HU Chaohua, LIU Yueming, PANG Ziqin, YUAN Zhaonian. Research Progress on the Current Status of Reactive Nitrogen Losses from Cropland Soil and the Regulation Pathways of Biochar Amendment [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2021, 23(6): 120-129. |
[4] | WANG Shan-shan1, LU Xiu-ping2, XU Zi-heng1*, LI Jun-ying2, PANG Tao2. Relationship between Composition Characteristics of Soil Humus and Physiochemical Characteristics of Soil in Yunnan Gold Corridor Tobacco-growing Areas [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2016, 18(1): 154-163. |
[5] | SUN Shu-bin1, YU Qing-tao2, YAO Xue-mei2, YANG Hong-qi1*, LIU Guang-hui2, ZHANG . Studies on Characteristics of Organic Matter Contents Distribution and Influence Factors in Longhui Soil of Tobacco Growing Areas [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2015, 17(6): 94-101. |
[6] | NIAN Jiale, LI Yuejin*, JING Yupeng, SONG Yao. Studies on Spatial Variability Characteristics of |Available Microelement Contents in Salinized Soil [J]. , 2013, 15(4): 163-167. |
[7] | CHENG Bao-yu,MA Jing-min,CHENG Lan,QI Chun-miao,CHANG Jian-bo. Analysis of Present Soil Nutritional Situation in Major |Flue-cured Tobacco Production Regions [J]. , 2009, 11(3): 131-136. |
[8] | XU Xiu-juan, WU Wen-ge. Crop Straw Resources and Their Utilization in Anhui Province [J]. , 2009, 11(2): 39-43. |
[9] | PENG Zheng-ping, WANG Yan-qun, LIU Shu-qiao, WANG Hong, WANG Lei, XUE Shi-chuan. Effects of Different Fertilizer Treatments on the Dry Matter |Accumulation of Winter Wheat and Vertical Distribution of Soil Nutrient [J]. , 2007, 9(6): 95-99. |
[10] | ZHOU Yi, WANG Chuan-jiang, CAO Yi-ping . Drought Resistance Effect and Analysis of Spraying Salt Nitro-fulvic Acid on Spring Wheat [J]. , 2005, 7(4): 46-50. |
[11] | CHENG Wang-da, YAO Hai-gen, WU Wei, ZHANG Guo-ping . Heavy Metal Pollution and Its Countermeasures in Soil-rice System [J]. , 2005, 7(4): 51-54. |
[12] | . [J]. , 2005, 7(1): 42-45. |
[13] | . [J]. , 2004, 6(4): 42-45. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||