江西烤烟柔软度与物理特性的关系分析及适宜区间研究

doi:10.13304/j.nykjdb.2016.254

中国农业科技导报 ›› 2017, Vol. 19 ›› Issue (1): 131-137.DOI: 10.13304/j.nykjdb.2016.254

• 资源环境生物药物生物质转化 • 上一篇

江西烤烟柔软度与物理特性的关系分析及适宜区间研究

占俊文1,2,沈雪婷3,何宽信4,梁淑平1,李立新4,焦绍赫4,于建军2*

1.江西省烟草公司抚州市公司, 江西抚州 344000;
2.河南农业大学烟草学院, 郑州 450002;
3.江西省烟草公司吉安市公司, 江西吉安 343000;
4.江西省烟叶科学研究所, 南昌 330045

收稿日期:2016-04-29 出版日期:2017-01-15 发布日期:2016-08-04
通讯作者: 于建军，教授，硕士生导师，主要从事烟叶质量评价与卷烟工艺研究工作。E-mail:yujj5655@163.com
作者简介:占俊文，硕士研究生，研究方向为烟叶质量评价。E-mail:liang128139@126.com。
基金资助:
江西省烟草专卖局（公司）科技项目（2013.01.006）资助。

Study on Relationship between Softness and Physical Characteristics of Flue-cured Tobacco and the Suitable Softness Range in Jiangxi Province

ZHAN Junwen1,2, SHEN Xueting3, HE Kuanxin4, LIANG Shuping1, LI Lixin4, JIAO Shaohe4, YU Jianjun2*

1.Fuzhou Branch of Jiangxi Tobacco Company, Jiangxi Fuzhou 344000;
2.College of Tobacco Science, Henan Agricultural University, Zhengzhou 450002;
3.Ji'an Branch of Jiangxi Tobacco Company, Jiangxi Ji'an 343000;
4.Tobacco Science Institute of Jiangxi Province, Nanchang 330045, China

Received:2016-04-29 Online:2017-01-15 Published:2016-08-04

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 为深入了解江西烤烟柔软度的总体状况、烤烟柔软度与物理特性的关系和烤烟烟叶柔软度的适宜范围，采集了江西省18个主要植烟县2014年烤烟烟叶样品476份，测定分析了烟叶柔软度与烟叶物理特性的关系。结果表明：江西省烟叶柔软度范围是11.70～79.90 mN，烟叶柔软度在部位间差异显著，不同县际下部叶柔软度差异较大，中、上部叶柔软度保持较一致水平；柔软度各区间物理特性差异显著，各物理指标、烟叶物理特性总分与柔软度的回归方程均达到显著水平，回归方程决定系数为0.839～0.961，拟合度好，烟叶柔软度可以在一定程度上代表烟叶物理加工质量。烟叶柔软度在20～60 mN范围内烟叶物理加工特性最好，主要表现为烟叶含梗率较小、可用性好、叶面密度、拉力和平衡含水率适宜，符合优质烟叶加工性能；其次是60～70 mN区间，烟叶物理加工特性较好。

关键词: 江西省, 烤烟, 柔软度, 物理特性, 关系分析, 适宜区间

Abstract: To understand better the overall situation of flue-cured tobacco softness in Jiangxi Province, and its relation with physical characteristics, and suitable range of tobacco leaf softness, this paper collected 476 flue-cured tobacco samples from 18 major tobacco planting counties of Jiangxi Province in 2014, and analyzed the relation between tobacco leaf softness and physical characteristics. The results showed that the softness range of flue-cured tobacco was 11.70～79.90 mN in Jiangxi Province. There were significance differences in softness between different parts of flue-cured tobacco leaf. The softness of lower part leaves existed bigger differences in different counties, and that of middle and upper parts leaves maintained a consistent level. Physical characteristics were significantly different in each softness range. The regression equations of each physical index, total physical characteristic scores and softness were all reached significant levels. The regression coefficient of determination was 0.839～0.961 with good fitting degree. The softness of tobacco leaf could in certain degree represent the good physical processing quality. The physical processing characteristics were the best when the leaf softness range was 20~60 mN, showing the superior tobacco leaf processing performance: lower stem ratio, good availability, suitable leaf blade density and tension, equilibrium moisture content. The secondery good leaf softness range was between 60～70 mN, where the physical processing characteristics were better.

Key words: Jiangxi province, flue-cured tobacco, softness, physical characteristics, relation analysis, suitable range

占俊文1,2,沈雪婷3,何宽信4,梁淑平1,李立新4,焦绍赫4,于建军2*. 江西烤烟柔软度与物理特性的关系分析及适宜区间研究[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2017, 19(1): 131-137.

ZHAN Junwen1,2, SHEN Xueting3, HE Kuanxin4, LIANG Shuping1, LI Lixin4, JIAO Shaohe4, YU Jianjun2*. Study on Relationship between Softness and Physical Characteristics of Flue-cured Tobacco and the Suitable Softness Range in Jiangxi Province[J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2017, 19(1): 131-137.

[1]	柳渊博, 王静, 朱学杰, 蒋伟峰, 刘天, 张锦中, 李耀鑫, 符云鹏. 不同水肥管理模式对烤烟养分积累及烟叶品质的影响[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2021, 23(9): 193-201.
[2]	范宁波1,周俊学2,江凯2,王宏2,史龙飞2,高玉龙3,陈颐3. 不同成熟期烤烟主脉中膜脂过氧化及其与衰老相关基因的关系探究[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2021, 23(3): 66-72.
[3]	保志娟,金蓉,杨金清,张琦,朱永立,赵正雄*. Pb、Zn复合作用对烤烟抗氧化酶及碳氮代谢的影响[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2021, 23(2): 65-72.
[4]	杨成翠1,徐照丽2,史普酉1,贾孟1,白羽祥1,朱宣全1,程亚东1,杨焕文1,王戈*. 氮肥运筹对烤烟养分积累和产质量的影响[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2020, 22(6): 176-185.
[5]	刘勇1,李立新1,吴金富2,赵树德2,何宽信1*. 多雨烟区倚靠式散叶装烟烘烤工艺对烟叶质量的影响[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2020, 22(4): 162-170.
[6]	刘扣珠1,高真真1,夏素素1,李建华2,顿松阳2,李洪亮2,王京2,段卫东3,史宏志1*. 基于产值和感官指标的豫中“上六片”烟叶栽培措施优化[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2020, 22(2): 158-165.
[7]	杨明坤1,李建华2,刘扣珠1,顿松阳2,李洪亮2,王典2,史宏志1*. 豫中上六片烤烟不同采收期对烤后烟叶品质的影响[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2020, 22(12): 163-171.
[8]	郑小雨1,李常军2,路晓崇1,王刚3,赵俊杰2,李云平2,彭玖华2,杨超1,2*. 烤烟不同成熟期色素含量变化及其与叶绿体超微结构的关系探究[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2020, 22(10): 60-68.
[9]	吕大树1,李子绅2,郭泽2,张亚恒1,夏阳3,杨雨波1,徐玮1,陈向东1,王英锋2,张力元1,代晓燕2*. 分次施用钾肥及配套措施对烤烟生长发育及其产质量的影响[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2020, 22(1): 116-123.
[10]	代快1,李江舟1*,蒲天燕1,计思贵1,张立猛1,张璐2,段淑辉3,孟军4,张翠萍1,樊苗苗5. 施用生物炭对3种烟用农药残留的影响[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2019, 21(8): 99-106.
[11]	刘超1,武云杰1,张安乾1,贺文俊1,张思琦1,陈芳1,何佳1,周方1,杨铁钊1,叶红朝2*. 外源GA3和IAA对烤烟内源激素调控效应和常规化学成分的影响[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2019, 21(8): 153-160.
[12]	王林,刘志宏,许自成*. 烤烟烟叶酸性致香物质与多酚含量、化学成分及口感特性的关系研究[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2019, 21(5): 159-169.
[13]	贾国涛§,杨欣玲§,杨永锋,王宝林*,申洪涛,王根发,刘向真,张书伟,刘超,姚倩,赵森森,牛洋洋. 腐熟小麦秸秆对烤烟品质的影响[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2019, 21(2): 133-140.
[14]	孟寒冬1,2,姬兴杰2. 气候变化对河南烟区烤烟石油醚提取物的影响[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2019, 21(12): 140-150.
[15]	吴飞跃1,王建峰2,高娅北1,段史江2,胡蓉花2,史文强2,程小强2,肖荣贵2,徐辰生1,3*. 失水胁迫对采后烟叶烘烤特性及淀粉代谢的影响[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2019, 21(10): 80-88.

江西烤烟柔软度与物理特性的关系分析及适宜区间研究

Study on Relationship between Softness and Physical Characteristics of Flue-cured Tobacco and the Suitable Softness Range in Jiangxi Province

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics