中国农业科技导报 ›› 2017, Vol. 19 ›› Issue (1): 100-107.DOI: 10.13304/j.nykjdb.2016.256

• 资源环境 生物药物 生物质转化 • 上一篇    下一篇

不同专用配方肥对水稻产量、养分吸收及经济效益的影响

李凯旭1,鲁剑巍1,鲁明星2,徐维明3,王振4,彭文勇5,李小坤1*   

  1. 1.华中农业大学资源与环境学院, 农业部长江中下游耕地保育重点实验室, 武汉 430070;
    2.湖北省耕地质量与肥料工作总站, 武汉 430070; 3.沙洋县土壤肥料工作站, 湖北 荆门 448200;
    4.武穴市农业局,  湖北 武穴 436300; 5.天门市耕地质量保护与肥料管理局, 湖北 天门 431700
  • 收稿日期:2016-05-03 出版日期:2017-01-15 发布日期:2016-08-04
  • 通讯作者: 李小坤,副教授,博士,研究方向为现代施肥技术。E-mail: lixiaokun@mail.hzau.edu.cn
  • 作者简介:李凯旭,硕士研究生,研究方向为现代施肥技术。E-mail:likaixu@webmail.hzau.edu.cn。
  • 基金资助:
    公益性行业(农业)科研专项(201303103);中央高校基本科研业务费专项(2662015PY135);国家测土配方施肥项目资助。

Effects of Different Special Formula Fertilizer on Rice Yield, Nutrient Uptake and Economic Benefit

LI Kaixu1, LU Jianwei1, LU Mingxing2, XU Weiming3, WANG Zhen4, PENG Wenyong5, LI Xiaokun1*   

  1. 1.Key Laboratory of Arable Land Conservation, Middle and Lower Reaches of Yangtse River, Ministry of Agriculture;
    College of Resources and Environment, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan 430070; 2.Hubei Cultivated Land
    Quality and Fertilizer Work Station, Wuhan 430070; 3.Shayang Soil and Fertilizer Station, Hubei Jingmen 448200;
    4.Wuxue Agricultural Bureau, Hubei Wuxue 436300; 5. Tianmen Cultivated Land Quality Protection and
    Fertilizer Management Bureau, Hubei Tianmen 431700, China
  • Received:2016-05-03 Online:2017-01-15 Published:2016-08-04

摘要: 为研究不同水稻专用配方肥及配套施肥技术对水稻生长、产量、养分吸收、肥料利用率和经济效益的影响,为水稻专用配方肥的合理施用提供依据,在湖北省3个水稻主产县(市)布置田间试验,设不施肥(CK)、经验推荐施肥(ERF)以及湖北省农业推广部门推荐的3个品牌水稻专用配方肥,共计5个处理。结果表明:不同施肥处理均可显著提高水稻的产量,与不施肥处理相比,施肥处理的水稻增产15.6%~119.9%;地上部N、P2O5和K2O的吸收量分别增加了31.7~86.6 kg/hm2、3.5~27.4 kg/hm2和65.6~152.8 kg/hm2;产值增加2 354~15 729元/hm2,增幅为15.6%~119.9%。与经验推荐施肥(ERF)处理相比,配方肥1(RSF1)处理水稻产量在3个试验点分别增加14.8%、21.6%和-3.6%;肥料偏生产力分别提高-20.6%、0.7%和-22.8%;纯收入均有降低的趋势,降幅为4.7%~46.4%。配方肥2(RSF2)处理水稻在3个试验点均有增产,增幅为9.9%~43.2%;肥料偏生产力提高11.4%~28.8%;纯收入增加9.3%~55.6%。配方肥3(RSF3)处理水稻产量在3个试验点分别增产26.3%、-31.4%和18.3%;肥料偏生产力降低3.5%~15.1%;纯收入分别增加-2.3%、15.3%和-82.1%。可见,不同水稻专用配方肥在不同区域的施用效果差异显著,配方肥2的效果较好,配方肥1(RSF1)和配方肥3(RSF3)的配方及配套施用技术有待进一步优化。

关键词: 水稻产量, 专用配方肥, 养分吸收, 肥料利用率, 经济效益

Abstract: In order to study the effects of different special fertilizer formula on rice growth, yield, nutrient uptake, fertilizer use efficiency and economic benefits, and  provide  basis for rational application of special fertilizer formula for  rice, this paper conducted field experiments in 3 major rice producing counties/cities of Hubei province, by 5 treatments: no fertilization(CK), experience recommended fertilization (ERF) and fertilization recommended by Hubei provincial agricultural extension department these 3 brands special fertilizer formula for rice. The results showed that different fertilizer treatments could significantly improve the rice yield. The rice yield of fertilization treatments were increased by 15.6%~119.9%, compared to that of the no fertilization treatment. The N, P2O5 and K2O uptakes by aboveground parts were increased by 31.7~86.6 kg/hm2, 3.5~27.4 kg/hm2 and 65.6~152.8 kg/hm2, respectively, and the production values were increased significantly by 2 354~15 729 yuan/hm2 with 15.6%~119.9% increasing rate. Compared with that of the experience recommended fertilization treatment (ERF), the rice yields by special fertilizer formula 1 (RSF1) at the 3 test points were increased by 14.8%, 21.6% and -3.6%, respectively. The partial productivity of fertilizer was increased by -20.6%, 0.7% and -22.8%, respectively. The net income were declined by 4.7%~46.4%. The rice yields by special fertilizer formula 2 (RSF2) treatment in the 3 sites were significantly increased by 9.9%~43.2%. Fertilizer partial productivity was increased by 11.4%~28.9%. The net income was increased by 9.3%~55.6%. The rice yield by special fertilizer formula 3 (RSF3) at the 3 test points were increased by 26.3%, -31.4% and 18.3%, respectively. The partial productivity of fertilizer was increased by 3.5%~15.1%. The net income at the 3 test points were increased by -2.3%, 15.3% and -82.1%, respectively. So  at different regions, the application effects of different rice special fertilizer formula were significant different. The effect of special fertilizer formula 2 (RSF2) is better. The 1 (RSF1) and 3 (RSF3) formulas and their matching applying technology still need to be further improved.

Key words: rice yield, specific fertilizer, nutrient uptake, fertilizer use efficiency, economic benefit