烤烟伸根期生理特性对干旱胁迫的响应及其抗旱性评价

doi:10.13304/j.nykjdb.2017.0850

中国农业科技导报 ›› 2018, Vol. 20 ›› Issue (6): 28-40.DOI: 10.13304/j.nykjdb.2017.0850

烤烟伸根期生理特性对干旱胁迫的响应及其抗旱性评价

童文杰1,邓小鹏1,谢贺1,王飞兵2,马二登1,李军营1,晋艳1,徐照丽1,宋振伟3*

1.云南省烟草农业科学研究院, 昆明 650021; 2.淮阴工学院生命科学与食品工程学院, 江苏淮安 223003; 3.中国农业科学院作物科学研究所, 农业部作物生理生态重点实验室, 北京 100081

收稿日期:2017-12-05 出版日期:2018-06-15 发布日期:2018-01-11
通讯作者: 宋振伟，副研究员，博士，主要从事农田生态研究。E-mail: songzhenwei@caas.cn
作者简介:童文杰，助理研究员，博士，主要从事烟草栽培研究。E-mail: tongwenjie0716@163.com。
基金资助:
云南省烟草公司科技计划项目（2016YN05, 2017YN06）资助。

Responses of Physiological Characteristics of Tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum L.) to Drought Stress at Root Extending Stage and Drought Resistances Evaluation

TONG Wenjie1, DENG Xiaopeng1, XIE He1, WANG Feibing2, MA Erdeng1, LI Junying1, JIN Yan1, XU Zhaoli1, SONG Zhenwei3*

1.Yunnan Academy of Tobacco Agricultural Sciences, Kunming 650021; 2.School of Life Science and Food Engineering, Huaiyin Institute of Technology, Huaian Jiangsu 223003; 3.Key Laboratory of Crop Physiology and Ecology, Ministry of Agriculture; Institute of Crop Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100081, China

Received:2017-12-05 Online:2018-06-15 Published:2018-01-11

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 针对西南地区春末夏初干旱频发的现状，以抗旱性不同的烤烟品种红花大金元（红大，抗旱性强）和云烟87（云87，抗旱性弱）为材料，采用防雨旱棚池栽的方式，对烤烟伸根期进行相同灌溉定额不同灌溉时间处理，分析不同干旱胁迫对烤烟抗逆基因表达、抗旱生理生化、烟叶色素含量、烟叶光合特征等的影响。结果表明：受干旱胁迫影响，烤烟叶绿素a、叶绿素b、叶绿素a+b、叶绿素a/b、类胡萝卜素、叶片含水量、蒸腾速率、气孔导度和净光合速率均呈下降趋势，SOD活性、胞间CO2浓度、脯氨酸含量、可溶性糖含量、丙二醛含量与NtSOD、NtPOD、NtCAT、NtP5CS、NtLEA5、NtNCED1相对表达量呈上升趋势。烤烟伸根期干旱胁迫破坏叶绿体脂膜结构，降低烟叶光合色素含量，进而由非气孔因素限制导致烤烟净光合速率下降。烤烟通过渗透调节和自由氧清除两种方式减缓干旱胁迫对烤烟伸根期生长发育的影响。干旱胁迫下NtP5CS、NtLEA5和NtNCED1等控制ABA、脯氨酸合成的基因上调表达，增加烟叶脯氨酸含量，降低液泡渗透势，减少烟叶失水。同时干旱胁迫使NtSOD、NtPOD、NtCAT基因上调表达，增强抗氧化酶活性，消除烤烟体内因干旱胁迫产生的自由氧。主成分分析得到三个主成分，累计贡献率达到91.3%，其中脯氨酸、SOD活性、可溶性糖、NtSOD、NtPOD、NtCAT、NtP5CS和NtLEA5被划分为第一主成分，叶绿素a、叶绿素b、叶绿素a+b、叶绿素a/b和类胡萝卜素被划分为第二主成分，净光合速率和叶片含水量被划分为第三主成分。红大抗旱性主成分得分4.608，比云87高40.8%。第一主成分“烤烟抗旱生理生化与基因表达因子”的变化与烤烟品种抗旱性密切相关，在烤烟抗旱育种时可作为烤烟伸根期抗旱性鉴定的主要鉴选指标，第二主成分“烟叶光合色素因子”和第三主成分“烤烟光合速率与叶片水势因子”可作为次要鉴选指标。

关键词: 烤烟, 伸根期, 干旱胁迫, 生理特性, 抗旱性

Abstract: Aiming at the situation of frequent drought in late spring and early summer in southwest areas, this paper adopted the method of rain proof drought shed installation and carried out a pool-culture experiment with same irrigation quota but different irrigation times, taking Honghuadajinyuan (Hongda) with strong drought resistance and Yunyan 87 (Yun 87) with weak drought resistance as materials. The paper also analyzed the effects of different drought stress on tobacco characteristics, such as expression of drought resistant gene, physiological-biochemical traits of drought resistance, pigment content of tobacco leaf, photosynthetic of tobacco leaf, etc.. The results showed that chlorophyll a, chlorophyll b, chlorophyll a+b, chlorophyll a/b, carotenoid, leaf water content, transpiration rate, stomatal conductance and net photosynthetic rate tended to decrease under drought stress. And intercellular carbon dioxide concentration, proline, superoxide dismutase activity, soluble sugar, malondialdehyde content, and relative expressions of NtSOD, NtPOD, NtCAT, NtP5CS, NtLEA5, NtNCED1 tended to increase under drought stress. Membrane lipids of chloroplast was effected and photosynthetic pigment content of tobacco leaf was decreased under drought stress at root extending stage, which lead to net photosynthetic rate decreased by non-stomatal factors. The effects of drought stress on tobacco growth and development at root extending stage were mitigated by osmotic adjustment and free oxygen removal. The relative expressions of NtP5CS, NtLEA5, NtNCED1, which regulated ABA and proline, were up-regulated under drought stress by raising proline content in tobacco leaf, and decreasing vacuole osmotic potential and leaf water loss. Meanwhile, the relative expressions of NtP5CS, NtLEA5, NtNCED1 were up-regulated under drought stress by strengthening activities of antioxidant enzymes, and removing free oxygen produced by drought stress. Three major components were obtained by principal component analysis. The cumulative contribution rate reached 91.3%, of which proline, superoxide dismutase activity, soluble sugar, NtSOD, NtPOD, NtCAT, NtP5CS and NtLEA5 were divided into the first major component; chlorophyll a, chlorophyll b, chlorophyll a+b, chlorophyll a/b and carotenoid were divided into the second major component; Net photosynthetic rate and leaf water content were divided into the third major component. The major component of drought resistance in Hongda gained 4.608 score, which was 40.08% higher than that of Yun 87. These indicators could be used as the principal indicators to identify the drought resistance of tobacco at root extending stage when breeding drought-tolerant tobacco varieties. The second major component including photosynthetic pigment index and third major component including net photosynthetic rate and leaf water content could be used as the secondary indicators.

Key words: tobacco, root extending stage, drought stress, physiological characteristics, drought resistance

童文杰1,邓小鹏1,谢贺1,王飞兵2,马二登1,李军营1,晋艳1,徐照丽1,宋振伟3*. 烤烟伸根期生理特性对干旱胁迫的响应及其抗旱性评价[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2018, 20(6): 28-40.

TONG Wenjie1, DENG Xiaopeng1, XIE He1, WANG Feibing2, MA Erdeng1, LI Junying1, JIN Yan1, XU Zhaoli1, SONG Zhenwei3*. Responses of Physiological Characteristics of Tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum L.) to Drought Stress at Root Extending Stage and Drought Resistances Evaluation[J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2018, 20(6): 28-40.

[1]	柳渊博, 王静, 朱学杰, 蒋伟峰, 刘天, 张锦中, 李耀鑫, 符云鹏. 不同水肥管理模式对烤烟养分积累及烟叶品质的影响[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2021, 23(9): 193-201.
[2]	张胜珍, 马艳芝. 氯化钙对盐胁迫下荆芥种子萌发及幼苗生理特性的影响 [J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2021, 23(7): 65-71.
[3]	刘源, 张秀妍, 徐妙云, 郑红艳, 邹俊杰, 张兰, 王磊. 水稻干旱胁迫的small RNA转录组分析[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2021, 23(6): 23-32.
[4]	胡杨, 李钢铁, 李星, 贾守义. 干旱胁迫对细穗柽柳幼苗生长和生理生化指标的影响[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2021, 23(6): 43-50.
[5]	石丽红, 唐海明, 肖小平, 李超, 刘曲, 程爱武, 程凯凯, 李微艳, 文丽. 双季稻区长期秸秆还田配施化肥对大麦生理特性与产量的影响[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2021, 23(5): 143-152.
[6]	张豪洋,金伊楠,孙燕鑫,李子玮,郭笑恒,许自成*. 植物microRNAs在干旱胁迫响应中的研究进展[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2021, 23(4): 27-36.
[7]	王得运1,2,刘培培1,陈云婷1,徐月莹1,周丽1,罗光明1*. 干旱胁迫对栀子内源激素含量的影响[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2021, 23(4): 58-63.
[8]	苏雨萌§,张旭婷§,特日格乐,田敏,尚晓蕊,李国婧,王瑞刚*. 高通量测序鉴定中间锦鸡儿干旱条件下的microRNA[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2021, 23(3): 51-57.
[9]	范宁波1,周俊学2,江凯2,王宏2,史龙飞2,高玉龙3,陈颐3. 不同成熟期烤烟主脉中膜脂过氧化及其与衰老相关基因的关系探究[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2021, 23(3): 66-72.
[10]	王志恒,杨秀柳,邹芳,黄思麒,周吴艳,徐中伟,魏玉清*. 旱盐交叉胁迫对甜高粱种子萌发和生理特性的影响[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2021, 23(2): 37-49.
[11]	张璐翔1,陈思蒙1,郑聪2,金伊楠1,韩艺3,许自成1,黄五星1,邵惠芳1*. 脱驯化时长对烟草幼苗抗旱性的影响[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2021, 23(2): 57-64.
[12]	保志娟,金蓉,杨金清,张琦,朱永立,赵正雄*. Pb、Zn复合作用对烤烟抗氧化酶及碳氮代谢的影响[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2021, 23(2): 65-72.
[13]	李憬霖, 刘绍东, 张思平, 陈静, 刘瑞华, 沈倩, 李阳, 马慧娟, 赵新华, 庞朝友. 棉花品种资源全生育期抗旱性评价及抗旱指标筛选[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2021, 23(10): 52-65.
[14]	李艳梅1,周亚文2,张琳1,廖上强1,孙焱鑫1. 抗逆与渗透物质耦合对番茄产量及水分利用的调控及机制探讨[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2021, 23(1): 43-50.
[15]	杨瑞萍1,刘瑞香1,马迎梅1*,郭占斌2,张宏武2,白宇1,赵新宇1. 不同藜麦资源的抗旱性评价及渗透调节剂对其抗旱性的影响[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2020, 22(9): 52-60.

烤烟伸根期生理特性对干旱胁迫的响应及其抗旱性评价

Responses of Physiological Characteristics of Tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum L.) to Drought Stress at Root Extending Stage and Drought Resistances Evaluation

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics