中国农业科技导报 ›› 2022, Vol. 24 ›› Issue (4): 210-217.DOI: 10.13304/j.nykjdb.2020.1102
• 方法与技术创新 • 上一篇
收稿日期:
2020-12-25
接受日期:
2021-07-07
出版日期:
2022-04-15
发布日期:
2022-04-19
作者简介:
韩素菊 E-mail:441312153@qq.com
基金资助:
Received:
2020-12-25
Accepted:
2021-07-07
Online:
2022-04-15
Published:
2022-04-19
摘要:
通过对铁皮石斛原球茎富硒悬浮培养的生长指标及多糖 、生物碱、总蛋白质、硒含量等指标进行评价,优化铁皮石斛富硒悬浮培养条件,为开发富硒铁皮石斛产品提供理论依据与物质基础。研究结果表明,优化的铁皮石斛原球茎富硒悬浮培养基为MS+2.0 mg·L-1 6-BA+ 0.50 mg·L-1 NAA+30 g·L-1蔗糖+0.05 mg·L-1 Na2SeO3,接种量为100 g·L-1,pH为5.8,继代周期为30 d,此时原球茎的硒含量最高,可达4.01 mg· kg-1,多糖含量为34.79%、生物碱含量为0.026%、总蛋白质含量为28.25%。试验成功建立了富硒铁皮石斛原球茎悬浮培养体系。
中图分类号:
韩素菊, 梅闯. 铁皮石斛原球茎富硒悬浮培养条件优化[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2022, 24(4): 210-217.
Suju HAN, Chuang MEI. Conditions Optimization of Selenium-enriched Suspension Culture for Protocorms of Dendrobium officinale[J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2022, 24(4): 210-217.
编号No. | 6-BA/(mg·L-1) | NAA/(mg·L-1) | 长势Growth | 颜色Colour | 疏松程度Looseness |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 0.0 | 0.00 | - | 逐渐褐化Go brown gradually | — |
2 | 1.0 | 0.25 | + | 绿色Green | 较紧密Dense |
3 | 1.0 | 0.50 | + | 绿色Green | 较紧密Dense |
4 | 1.0 | 1.00 | ++ | 深黄绿色Dark chartreuse | 较疏松Loose |
5 | 2.0 | 0.25 | + | 绿色Green | 较疏松Loose |
6 | 2.0 | 0.50 | +++ | 浅黄绿色Aqua | 疏松Looser |
7 | 2.0 | 1.00 | ++ | 黄绿色Chartreuse | 较疏松Loose |
8 | 2.5 | 0.25 | + | 绿色Green | 较紧密Dense |
9 | 2.5 | 0.50 | + | 绿色Green | 较紧密Dense |
10 | 2.5 | 1.00 | + | 深绿色Dark green | 紧密Denser |
表1 不同培养基对铁皮石斛原球茎生长的影响
Table 1 Effect of different medias on the growth of protocorms of Dendrobium officinale
编号No. | 6-BA/(mg·L-1) | NAA/(mg·L-1) | 长势Growth | 颜色Colour | 疏松程度Looseness |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 0.0 | 0.00 | - | 逐渐褐化Go brown gradually | — |
2 | 1.0 | 0.25 | + | 绿色Green | 较紧密Dense |
3 | 1.0 | 0.50 | + | 绿色Green | 较紧密Dense |
4 | 1.0 | 1.00 | ++ | 深黄绿色Dark chartreuse | 较疏松Loose |
5 | 2.0 | 0.25 | + | 绿色Green | 较疏松Loose |
6 | 2.0 | 0.50 | +++ | 浅黄绿色Aqua | 疏松Looser |
7 | 2.0 | 1.00 | ++ | 黄绿色Chartreuse | 较疏松Loose |
8 | 2.5 | 0.25 | + | 绿色Green | 较紧密Dense |
9 | 2.5 | 0.50 | + | 绿色Green | 较紧密Dense |
10 | 2.5 | 1.00 | + | 深绿色Dark green | 紧密Denser |
图1 不同培养基对铁皮石斛原球茎稳定生长的影响注:图中编号对应表1。
Fig. 1 Effect of different media on the growth of protocorms of Dendrobium officinaleNote: The numbers in the figure are the same as table 1.
接种量 Inoculating quantity/g | 鲜重 Fresh weight/g | 干重 Dry weight/g | 增殖系数 Multiplication |
---|---|---|---|
1 | 1.42±0.62 | 0.18±0.06 | 0.42±0.36 d |
2 | 3.19±0.36 | 0.38±0.02 | 0.59±0.86 b |
3 | 5.07±0.83 | 0.49±0.11 | 0.69±0.13 a |
4 | 6.54±1.31 | 0.59±0.31 | 0.63±0.45 b |
5 | 7.65±1.43 | 0.62±0.43 | 0.53±0.06 c |
表2 接种量对原球茎增殖的影响
Table 2 Effect of different inoculating quantity on protocorms multiplication
接种量 Inoculating quantity/g | 鲜重 Fresh weight/g | 干重 Dry weight/g | 增殖系数 Multiplication |
---|---|---|---|
1 | 1.42±0.62 | 0.18±0.06 | 0.42±0.36 d |
2 | 3.19±0.36 | 0.38±0.02 | 0.59±0.86 b |
3 | 5.07±0.83 | 0.49±0.11 | 0.69±0.13 a |
4 | 6.54±1.31 | 0.59±0.31 | 0.63±0.45 b |
5 | 7.65±1.43 | 0.62±0.43 | 0.53±0.06 c |
培养天数 Cultivated days/d | 鲜重 Fresh weight/g | 干重 Dry weight/g | 增殖系数 Multiplication |
---|---|---|---|
6 | 5.66±0.15 | 0.51±0.17 | 0.89±0.13 i |
9 | 7.64±0.32 | 0.65±0.21 | 1.55±0.24 h |
12 | 9.38±0.05 | 0.69±0.13 | 2.13±0.09 g |
15 | 10.13±1.00 | 0.71±0.15 | 2.38±0.54 e |
18 | 10.33±1.13 | 0.72±0.08 | 2.44±0.31 d |
21 | 10.76±1.00 | 0.79±0.18 | 2.59±0.41 c |
24 | 10.95±2.55 | 0.83±0.14 | 2.65±0.22 b |
27 | 11.06±1.88 | 0.85±0.26 | 2.69±0.18 b |
30 | 11.26±1.67 | 0.88±0.08 | 2.75±0.41 a |
33 | 11.59±1.52 | 0.89±0.11 | 2.86±0.08 a |
36 | 11.52±1.77 | 0.89±0.09 | 2.84±0.54 a |
39 | 10.84±1.20 | 0.89±0.66 | 2.61±0.41 b |
42 | 10.70±1.41 | 0.88±0.29 | 2.57±0.33 c |
45 | 10.58±1.31 | 0.88±0.43 | 2.53±0.71 c |
48 | 10.55±1.53 | 0.87±0.44 | 2.52±0.27 c |
51 | 9.84±1.41 | 0.87±0.12 | 2.28±0.11 f |
表3 培养天数对原球茎增殖的影响
Table 3 Effect of different cultivated days on protocorm multiplication
培养天数 Cultivated days/d | 鲜重 Fresh weight/g | 干重 Dry weight/g | 增殖系数 Multiplication |
---|---|---|---|
6 | 5.66±0.15 | 0.51±0.17 | 0.89±0.13 i |
9 | 7.64±0.32 | 0.65±0.21 | 1.55±0.24 h |
12 | 9.38±0.05 | 0.69±0.13 | 2.13±0.09 g |
15 | 10.13±1.00 | 0.71±0.15 | 2.38±0.54 e |
18 | 10.33±1.13 | 0.72±0.08 | 2.44±0.31 d |
21 | 10.76±1.00 | 0.79±0.18 | 2.59±0.41 c |
24 | 10.95±2.55 | 0.83±0.14 | 2.65±0.22 b |
27 | 11.06±1.88 | 0.85±0.26 | 2.69±0.18 b |
30 | 11.26±1.67 | 0.88±0.08 | 2.75±0.41 a |
33 | 11.59±1.52 | 0.89±0.11 | 2.86±0.08 a |
36 | 11.52±1.77 | 0.89±0.09 | 2.84±0.54 a |
39 | 10.84±1.20 | 0.89±0.66 | 2.61±0.41 b |
42 | 10.70±1.41 | 0.88±0.29 | 2.57±0.33 c |
45 | 10.58±1.31 | 0.88±0.43 | 2.53±0.71 c |
48 | 10.55±1.53 | 0.87±0.44 | 2.52±0.27 c |
51 | 9.84±1.41 | 0.87±0.12 | 2.28±0.11 f |
硒含量 Selenium content/(mg·L-1) | 鲜重 Fresh weight/g | 增殖系数 Multiplication | 富硒含量 Selenium-enriched content/(mg·kg-1) | 多糖含量 Polysaccharide content/% | 生物碱含量 Alkaloid content/% | 总蛋白质含量 Total protein content/% |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0.00 | 7.90±1.41 ab | 1.63±0.21 ab | 1.13±0.69 c | 21.96±1.89 b | 0.020±0.00 b | 26.41±3.45 b |
0.05 | 8.84±1.58 a | 1.95±0.04 a | 4.01±0.14 a | 29.07±2.42 a | 0.025±0.00 a | 27.21±2.77 a |
0.10 | 6.85±2.41 b | 1.28±0.21 b | 3.27±0.47 b | 18.87±2.51 c | 0.017±0.00 b | 25.58±3.21 bc |
0.15 | 5.34±0.87 bc | 0.78±0.02 c | 3.26±0.82 b | 14.19±1.69 c | 0.012±0.00 c | 24.25±5.54 cd |
0.20 | 4.65±0.53 d | 0.55±0.11 c | 3.81±0.98 b | 13.07±0.84 d | 0.010±0.00 c | 22.73±4.78 d |
0.25 | 3.81±0.33 e | 0.27±0.13 d | 3.00±0.31 b | 10.27±0.53 d | 0.010±0.00 c | 16.80±0.21 d |
表4 硒含量对原球茎富硒含量、多糖、生物碱及总蛋白含量的影响
Table 4 Effect of different selenium content on selenium?enriched content, polysaccharide content, alkaloid content and total protein content
硒含量 Selenium content/(mg·L-1) | 鲜重 Fresh weight/g | 增殖系数 Multiplication | 富硒含量 Selenium-enriched content/(mg·kg-1) | 多糖含量 Polysaccharide content/% | 生物碱含量 Alkaloid content/% | 总蛋白质含量 Total protein content/% |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0.00 | 7.90±1.41 ab | 1.63±0.21 ab | 1.13±0.69 c | 21.96±1.89 b | 0.020±0.00 b | 26.41±3.45 b |
0.05 | 8.84±1.58 a | 1.95±0.04 a | 4.01±0.14 a | 29.07±2.42 a | 0.025±0.00 a | 27.21±2.77 a |
0.10 | 6.85±2.41 b | 1.28±0.21 b | 3.27±0.47 b | 18.87±2.51 c | 0.017±0.00 b | 25.58±3.21 bc |
0.15 | 5.34±0.87 bc | 0.78±0.02 c | 3.26±0.82 b | 14.19±1.69 c | 0.012±0.00 c | 24.25±5.54 cd |
0.20 | 4.65±0.53 d | 0.55±0.11 c | 3.81±0.98 b | 13.07±0.84 d | 0.010±0.00 c | 22.73±4.78 d |
0.25 | 3.81±0.33 e | 0.27±0.13 d | 3.00±0.31 b | 10.27±0.53 d | 0.010±0.00 c | 16.80±0.21 d |
1 | 宋美芳,李光,陈曦,等.两种石斛多糖提高小鼠免疫活性的初步研究[J].中国药学杂志,2013,48(6):428-431. |
SONG M F, LI G, CHEN X, et al.. Primary study of Dendrobium polysaccharides improving immunity activity on mouse [J].Chin. Pharma. J.,2013,48(6):428-431. | |
2 | 蔡海兰,黄晓君,聂少平,等.铁皮石斛多糖对RAW264.7细胞分泌TNF-α的影响[J].中国药理学通报,2012,28(11) :1553-1556. |
CAI H L, HUANG X J, NIE S P, et al.. Effects of polysaccharides from Dendrobium officinale on the production of TNF-α by RAW264.7 cells [J].Chin. Pharmacol. Bulletin,2012,28(11) :1553-1556. | |
3 | 鹿伟,陈玉满,徐彩菊,等.铁皮石斛抗疲劳作用研究[J].中国卫生检验杂志,2010,20(10):2488-2490. |
LU W, CHEN Y M, XU C J, et al.. Study of anti-fatigue function of Dendrobium candidum on mice [J].Chin. J. Health Lab Technol,2010,20(10):2488-2490. | |
4 | 吴昊姝,徐建华,陈立钻,等.铁皮石斛降血糖作用及其机制的研究[J].中国中药杂志,2004,29(2):160-163. |
WU H S, XU J H, CHEN L Z, et al..Studies on anti-hyperglycemic effect and its mechanism of Dendrobium candidum [J].China J. Chin. Materia Medica,2004,29(2):160-163. | |
5 | 罗慧玲,蔡体育,陈巧伦,等.石斛多糖增强脐带血和肿瘤病人外周血LAK细胞体外杀伤作用的研究[J].癌症,2000,19(12):1124-1126。 |
LUO H L, CAI T Y, CHEN Q L, et al..Enhancement of Dendrobium candidum polysaccharide on killing effect of LAK cells of umbilical cord blood and peripharal blood of cancer patients in vitro [J].Chin. J. Cancer,2000,19(12):1124-1126. | |
6 | 张继文,王善英,王其兵.富硒植物与人体健康[J].植物杂志,1997(3):10-11. |
7 | 管凌飞.富硒植物中硒的形态分析研究[D].成都:成都理工大学,2007. |
GUAN L F. Analyze and research speciation of selenium in selenium-rich plants [D].Chengdu: Chengdu University of Technology, 2007. | |
8 | RAYMAN M P. The importance of selenium to human health [J]. Lancet,2000,356(9225):233-274. |
9 | 高婧.中国典型高硒与硒缺乏区硒营养摄入规律研究[D].合肥:中国科学技术大学,2010. |
GAO J. Studies on the rugular pattern of selenium nutritional intake in the typical high-selenium and selenium deficiency area, China [D]. Hefei:University of Science and Technology of China, 2010. | |
10 | 卢岚,鲁兵,王春娥.保健食品中有机硒和无机硒的分析探讨[J].中国卫生检验杂志,2010,30(7):82-86. |
LU L, LU B, WANG C E. Analysis of organic selenium and inorganic selenium in health foods [J].Chin. J. Health Laboratory Technol.,2010,30(7):82-86. | |
11 | 赵春梅,曹启民,唐群锋,等.植物富硒规律的研究进展[J].热带农业科学,2010,30(7):82-86. |
ZHAO C M. CAO Q M, TANG Q F, et al.. Research advances on selenium accumulation in plants[J].Chin. J. Tropical Agric.,2010,30(7):82-86. | |
12 | 李登超,朱祝军,韩秋敏,等.硒对菠菜、小白菜生长及抗氧化活性的研究[J].上海交通大学学报,2003,21(1): 5-8. |
LI D C, ZHU Z J, HAN Q M, et al.. Effects of selenium on the growth and antioxidative activity in spinach and pakchoi [J]. J. Shanghai Jiaotong Univ., 2003,21(1): 5-8. | |
13 | 李登超,朱祝军,徐志豪,等.硒对小白菜生长和养分吸收的影响[J].植物营养与肥料学报,2003,9(3):353-358. |
LI D C, ZHU Z J, XU Z H, et al..Effects of selenium on the growth and nutrient absorption of pakchoi [J].J. Plant Nutr Fert., 2003,9(3):353-358. | |
14 | 范传颖,陶正明,吴志刚.苯酚硫酸法与蒽酮硫酸法测定铁皮石斛中多糖含量的比较[J]. 浙江农业科学,2013(7):799-801. |
15 | 范丽苹.四种植物生长调节剂对铁皮石斛原球茎影响研究[D].成都:四川农业大学,2014. |
FAN L P. Effects of 4 kinds of plant growth regulars on biomass, polysaccharides, physiological and biochemical characteristics of Dendrobium officinale protocorm [D].Chengdu: Sichuan Agricultural University, 2014. | |
16 | 李亚芳,张晓华,孙国明.石斛中总生物碱和多糖的含量测定[J].中国药事, 2002, 16(7):426- 428. |
LI Y F, ZHANG X H, SUN G M. Determination of alkaloids and polysaccharide in Herba Dendrobii [J]. Chin. Pharm. Affairs,2002, 16(7):426-428. | |
17 | 金蓉鸾,孙继军,张远名.11种石斛的总生物碱的测定[J].南京药学院报,1981(1):9-10. |
JIN R L, SUN J J, ZHANG Y M. Determination of 11 total alkaloid from caulis Dendrobii [J].J. China Pharm.Univ., 1981(1):9-10. | |
18 | 洪萨丽.诱导子对霍山石斛悬浮培养原球茎生长和生物碱的影响[D].合肥:安徽农业大学,2009. |
HONG S L. Effect of elicitors on cell growth and the alkaloid accumulation of suspension-cultured D .huoshanense PLBs [D].Hefei:Anhui Agricultural University, 2009. | |
19 | 曹艳,黄必胜.半夏总蛋白含量的紫外吸收法测定[J].湖北中医杂志,2005(7):48. |
20 | 张本厚,胡燕花,金磊磊,等.铁皮石斛组培体药用和营养成分含量的比较[J].江苏农业科学,2015,43(10):324-327. |
21 | 邓娟,王延花,孙菁,等.ICP-OES法测定两种喉毛花植物中21种矿质元素[J].天然矿物研究与开发,2015,5(27):837-841. |
DENG J, WANG Y H, SUN J, et al.. Determination of 21 mineral elements in two species of comastoma by ICP-OES [J].Nat. Prod. Res. Dev. 2015,5(27):837-841. | |
22 | 徐国华,常俊,毛善国,等.硒对铁皮石斛拟原球茎生长及抗氧化系统的影响[J].南京师大学报,2008,31(3):86-90. |
XU G H, CHANG J, MAO S G, et al.. Effects of selenium on the growth and antioxidative system in protocorm –like bodies of Dendrobium officinale [J]. J. Nanjing Norm.Univ., 2008,31(3):86-90. | |
23 | 何铁光,苏江,王灿琴,等.铁皮石斛不同来源材料多糖和氨基酸含量的比较[J]. 广西农业科学,2007,38(1):32-34. |
24 | 孙丹.铁皮石斛圆球茎生物反应器培养及有效成分含量的分析[D]. 吉林延边:延边大学,2010. |
SUN D. Study on proliorferation of protocorm-like bodies in bioreactor culture and analysis on effective components contents of Dendrobium Candium [D]. Jilin Yanbian: Yanbian University, 2010. | |
25 | 尚庆茂,高丽红,李式军.硒素营养对水培生菜品质的影响[J].中国农业大学学报,1998(3):67-71. |
SHANG Q M, GAO L H, LI S J, et al.. Effects of selenium on quality of hydroponics Lettuce [J]. J. China Agric.Univ.,1998(3):67-71. | |
26 | 杜振宇,史衍玺,王清华.施硒对茄子吸收转化硒和品质的影响[J].植物营养与肥料学报,2004(3):298-301. |
DU Z Y, SHI Y X, WANG Q H. Effects of selenium application on the selenium absorption and transformation of eggplant and its qualities [J].Plant Nutr. Fert. Science,2004(3):298-301. | |
27 | 倪蕾,孙涌栋,李艳华,等.不同浓度亚硒酸钠对水培苦苣生长及营养品质的影响[J].北方园艺,2016(14):40-43. |
NI L, SUN Y D, LI Y H, et al.. Effect of different concentrations o f Na2SeO3 on the growth and nutritional quality of cichorium endivia [J].Northern Hort., 2016(14):40-43. |
[1] | 张宇杰, 郭平毅, 郭美俊, 周浩, 原向阳, 董淑琦, 王玉国. 外源硒矿粉对谷子保护酶活性、产量和籽粒中硒含量的影响[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2021, 23(5): 153-159. |
[2] | 郭慧慧,林丛发,蒋元斌,李志刚. 响应面试验优化霍山石斛原球茎增殖培养基[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2020, 22(3): 173-180. |
[3] | 李文杰,李美阳*,宫惠. 欧洲缬草不定根诱导与悬浮培养的研究[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2020, 22(1): 179-186. |
[4] | 李晓娇,晏爱芬,杨丽华,何健民,侯洪波*. 龙陵铁皮石斛花色苷的提取工艺及抑菌活性研究[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2017, 19(4): 119-127. |
[5] | 胡燕花1,张本厚1*|贾明良2,陈集双1,3*. 间歇浸没式生物反应器培养铁皮石斛组培苗[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2016, 18(3): 190-194. |
[6] | 王洋,韦云路,郭秀锋,李虹霞,胡锦蓉,李平兰*. 富硒双歧杆菌南瓜菌粉的研制[J]. , 2015, 17(3): 92-99. |
阅读次数 | ||||||
全文 |
|
|||||
摘要 |
|
|||||