中国农业科技导报 ›› 2022, Vol. 24 ›› Issue (5): 46-55.DOI: 10.13304/j.nykjdb.2021.0085
黄雅婕(), 任丹, 李生梅, 崔进鑫, 杨涛, 任姣姣, 高文伟(
)
收稿日期:
2021-01-25
接受日期:
2021-04-11
出版日期:
2022-05-15
发布日期:
2022-06-06
通讯作者:
高文伟
作者简介:
黄雅婕 E-mail: 540814731@qq.com;
基金资助:
Yajie HUANG(), Dan REN, Shengmei LI, Jinxin CUI, Tao YANG, Jiaojiao REN, Wenwei GAO(
)
Received:
2021-01-25
Accepted:
2021-04-11
Online:
2022-05-15
Published:
2022-06-06
Contact:
Wenwei GAO
摘要:
为综合评价陆地棉的耐盐碱性并筛选出关键鉴定指标,以90份不同来源的陆地棉品种为试验材料,通过主成分分析、聚类分析和逐步回归法对不同品种萌发期、出苗期和苗期的耐盐碱性进行综合评价,并筛选鉴定指标。结果表明,苗期受到胁迫,棉花下胚轴、株高、叶片数及第1片真叶面积降低,出苗率和叶片SPAD值升高。相关分析表明,株高与出苗率显著正相关,与下胚轴长、叶片数和第1片真叶面积呈极显著正相关。对90份品种的综合评价D值排序,军棉1号的D值最高,耐盐碱性最强;中棉所49的D值最小,耐盐碱性最弱。根据D值进行聚类,将90份品种划分为4类:强耐盐碱品种3份、中耐盐碱品种18份、弱耐盐碱品种52份和盐敏感品种17份。依据最佳回归方程筛选出4个关键鉴定指标:出苗率、叶片SPAD值、第1片真叶面积和株高,为棉花进行初步的耐盐碱性鉴定提供了理论依据。
中图分类号:
黄雅婕, 任丹, 李生梅, 崔进鑫, 杨涛, 任姣姣, 高文伟. 陆地棉苗期的耐盐碱性评价及鉴定指标筛选[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2022, 24(5): 46-55.
Yajie HUANG, Dan REN, Shengmei LI, Jinxin CUI, Tao YANG, Jiaojiao REN, Wenwei GAO. Evaluation and Screening of Salt and Alkali Tolerance Indices of Upland Cotton Seedlings[J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2022, 24(5): 46-55.
来源Origin | 品种Variety | 编号ID | 来源Origin | 品种Variety | 编号ID. |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
黄河流域 Basin of the Yellow River | GK99-1 | 1 | 黄河流域Basin of the Yellow River | 鲁棉研17 Lumianyan 17 | 21 |
K638 | 2 | 山农丰抗棉6号Shannongfengkangmian 6 | 22 | ||
百棉1号Baimian 1 | 3 | 山西引进W4 Shanxi W4 | 23 | ||
创优9号Chuangyou 9 | 4 | 山西引进W5 Shanxi W5 | 24 | ||
德利农5号Delinong 5 | 5 | 山西引进W6 Shanxi W6 | 25 | ||
富棉289 Fumian 289 | 6 | 陕401 Shaan 401 | 26 | ||
邯郸885 Handan 885 | 7 | 陕棉5号 Shaanmian 5 | 27 | ||
邯棉559 Hanmian 559 | 8 | 新木棉5号Xinmumian 5 | 28 | ||
冀3927 Ji 3927 | 9 | 鑫秋1号Xinqiu 1 | 29 | ||
冀棉15 Jimian 15 | 10 | 银山7号Yinshan 7 | 30 | ||
锦科棉9号Jinkemian 9 | 11 | 豫棉17号Yumian 17 | 31 | ||
晋棉36 Jinmian 36 | 12 | 豫棉19号Yumian 19 | 32 | ||
科抗棉2 Kekangmian 2 (KR028) | 13 | 豫棉1号Yumian 1 | 33 | ||
鲁458 Lu 458 (7-264) | 14 | 豫棉20号Yumian 20 | 34 | ||
鲁棉22 Lumian 22 | 15 | 豫棉8号Yumian 8 | 35 | ||
鲁棉28 Lumian 28 | 16 | 豫早73 Yuzao 73 | 36 | ||
鲁棉2号Lumian 2 | 17 | 中12 Zhong 12 | 37 | ||
鲁棉37 Lumian 37 | 18 | 中ARC105 Zhong ARC105 (T-105) | 38 | ||
鲁棉9号Lumian 9 | 19 | 中R773-72 Zhong R773-72 (7-72) | 39 | ||
鲁棉研16 Lumianyan 16 | 20 | 中棉所17 Zhongmiansuo 17 | 40 |
表 1 供试棉花品种及来源
Table 1 Cotton varieties and origin
来源Origin | 品种Variety | 编号ID | 来源Origin | 品种Variety | 编号ID. |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
黄河流域 Basin of the Yellow River | GK99-1 | 1 | 黄河流域Basin of the Yellow River | 鲁棉研17 Lumianyan 17 | 21 |
K638 | 2 | 山农丰抗棉6号Shannongfengkangmian 6 | 22 | ||
百棉1号Baimian 1 | 3 | 山西引进W4 Shanxi W4 | 23 | ||
创优9号Chuangyou 9 | 4 | 山西引进W5 Shanxi W5 | 24 | ||
德利农5号Delinong 5 | 5 | 山西引进W6 Shanxi W6 | 25 | ||
富棉289 Fumian 289 | 6 | 陕401 Shaan 401 | 26 | ||
邯郸885 Handan 885 | 7 | 陕棉5号 Shaanmian 5 | 27 | ||
邯棉559 Hanmian 559 | 8 | 新木棉5号Xinmumian 5 | 28 | ||
冀3927 Ji 3927 | 9 | 鑫秋1号Xinqiu 1 | 29 | ||
冀棉15 Jimian 15 | 10 | 银山7号Yinshan 7 | 30 | ||
锦科棉9号Jinkemian 9 | 11 | 豫棉17号Yumian 17 | 31 | ||
晋棉36 Jinmian 36 | 12 | 豫棉19号Yumian 19 | 32 | ||
科抗棉2 Kekangmian 2 (KR028) | 13 | 豫棉1号Yumian 1 | 33 | ||
鲁458 Lu 458 (7-264) | 14 | 豫棉20号Yumian 20 | 34 | ||
鲁棉22 Lumian 22 | 15 | 豫棉8号Yumian 8 | 35 | ||
鲁棉28 Lumian 28 | 16 | 豫早73 Yuzao 73 | 36 | ||
鲁棉2号Lumian 2 | 17 | 中12 Zhong 12 | 37 | ||
鲁棉37 Lumian 37 | 18 | 中ARC105 Zhong ARC105 (T-105) | 38 | ||
鲁棉9号Lumian 9 | 19 | 中R773-72 Zhong R773-72 (7-72) | 39 | ||
鲁棉研16 Lumianyan 16 | 20 | 中棉所17 Zhongmiansuo 17 | 40 |
来源Origin | 品种Variety | 编号No. | 来源Origin | 品种Variety | 编号No. |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
黄河流域Basin of the Yellow River | 中棉所24 Zhongmiansuo 24 | 41 | 长江流域Basin of the Yangtze River | 苏棉8号Sumian 8 | 66 |
中棉所25 Zhongmiansuo 25 | 42 | 宛棉3号Wanmian 3 | 67 | ||
中棉所3号Zhongmiansuo 3 | 43 | 皖棉17 Wanmian 17 | 68 | ||
中棉所43 Zhongmiansuo 43 | 44 | 湘棉13号Xiangmian 13 | 69 | ||
中棉所44 Zhongmiansuo 44 | 45 | 湘棉16号Xiangmian 16 | 70 | ||
中棉所45 Zhongmiansuo 45 | 46 | 盐1074 Yan 1074 | 71 | ||
中棉所49 Zhongmiansuo 49 | 47 | 盐1113Yan 1113 | 72 | ||
中棉所5号Zhongmiansuo 5 | 48 | 盐棉1号Yanmian 1 | 73 | ||
中棉所9号Zhongmiansuo 9 | 49 | 一树红Yishuhong | 74 | ||
中宿410408 Zhongsu 410408 | 50 | 渝棉1号Yumian 1 | 75 | ||
中资4480 Zhongzi 4480 (7-61) | 51 | 西北内陆Inland Northwest | 军棉1号Junmian 1 | 76 | |
长江流域Basin of the Yangtze River | 川R128 Chuan R128 | 52 | 新陆早12号Xinlluzao 12 | 77 | |
鄂光棉Eguangmian | 53 | 新陆早1号Xinluzao 1 | 78 | ||
鄂抗棉9号Ekangmian 9 | 54 | 新陆早28号Xinluzao 28 | 79 | ||
鄂棉13号Emian 13 | 55 | 新陆早30号Xinluzao 30 | 80 | ||
鄂棉18号Emian 18 | 56 | 新陆中21号Xinluzhong 21 | 81 | ||
鄂棉9号Emian 9 | 57 | 新陆中33 Xinluzhong 33 | 82 | ||
荆55168 Jing 55168 (7-42) | 58 | 新陆中35 Xinluzhong 35 | 83 | ||
泗棉2号Simian 2 | 59 | 北部特早熟Early mature region | 朝阳棉1号Chaoyangmian 1 | 84 | |
泗棉3号Simian 3 | 60 | 辽棉19号Liaomian 19 | 85 | ||
泗阳331 Siyang 331 | 61 | 辽棉3号Liaomian 3 | 86 | ||
苏7036 Su 7036 (7-15) | 62 | 辽棉6号Liaomian 6 | 87 | ||
苏棉11号Sumian 11 | 63 | 美国 America | HS427-10 | 88 | |
苏棉20号Sumian 20 | 64 | 岱字棉15 Deltapine 15 | 89 | ||
苏棉4号Sumian 4 | 65 | 金字棉King cotton | 90 |
表 1 供试棉花品种及来源 (续表Continued)
Table 1 Cotton varieties and origin
来源Origin | 品种Variety | 编号No. | 来源Origin | 品种Variety | 编号No. |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
黄河流域Basin of the Yellow River | 中棉所24 Zhongmiansuo 24 | 41 | 长江流域Basin of the Yangtze River | 苏棉8号Sumian 8 | 66 |
中棉所25 Zhongmiansuo 25 | 42 | 宛棉3号Wanmian 3 | 67 | ||
中棉所3号Zhongmiansuo 3 | 43 | 皖棉17 Wanmian 17 | 68 | ||
中棉所43 Zhongmiansuo 43 | 44 | 湘棉13号Xiangmian 13 | 69 | ||
中棉所44 Zhongmiansuo 44 | 45 | 湘棉16号Xiangmian 16 | 70 | ||
中棉所45 Zhongmiansuo 45 | 46 | 盐1074 Yan 1074 | 71 | ||
中棉所49 Zhongmiansuo 49 | 47 | 盐1113Yan 1113 | 72 | ||
中棉所5号Zhongmiansuo 5 | 48 | 盐棉1号Yanmian 1 | 73 | ||
中棉所9号Zhongmiansuo 9 | 49 | 一树红Yishuhong | 74 | ||
中宿410408 Zhongsu 410408 | 50 | 渝棉1号Yumian 1 | 75 | ||
中资4480 Zhongzi 4480 (7-61) | 51 | 西北内陆Inland Northwest | 军棉1号Junmian 1 | 76 | |
长江流域Basin of the Yangtze River | 川R128 Chuan R128 | 52 | 新陆早12号Xinlluzao 12 | 77 | |
鄂光棉Eguangmian | 53 | 新陆早1号Xinluzao 1 | 78 | ||
鄂抗棉9号Ekangmian 9 | 54 | 新陆早28号Xinluzao 28 | 79 | ||
鄂棉13号Emian 13 | 55 | 新陆早30号Xinluzao 30 | 80 | ||
鄂棉18号Emian 18 | 56 | 新陆中21号Xinluzhong 21 | 81 | ||
鄂棉9号Emian 9 | 57 | 新陆中33 Xinluzhong 33 | 82 | ||
荆55168 Jing 55168 (7-42) | 58 | 新陆中35 Xinluzhong 35 | 83 | ||
泗棉2号Simian 2 | 59 | 北部特早熟Early mature region | 朝阳棉1号Chaoyangmian 1 | 84 | |
泗棉3号Simian 3 | 60 | 辽棉19号Liaomian 19 | 85 | ||
泗阳331 Siyang 331 | 61 | 辽棉3号Liaomian 3 | 86 | ||
苏7036 Su 7036 (7-15) | 62 | 辽棉6号Liaomian 6 | 87 | ||
苏棉11号Sumian 11 | 63 | 美国 America | HS427-10 | 88 | |
苏棉20号Sumian 20 | 64 | 岱字棉15 Deltapine 15 | 89 | ||
苏棉4号Sumian 4 | 65 | 金字棉King cotton | 90 |
性状Trait | CK | ST | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
极小值 Min. | 极大值 Max. | 均值 Mean | 变异系数 CV/% | 极小值 Min. | 极大值 Max. | 均值 Mean | 变异系数 CV/% | |
出苗率ER/% | 0.45 | 0.98 | 0.83±0.09 | 10.46 | 0.60 | 1.00 | 0.87±0.09 | 9.94 |
下胚轴长HL/cm | 3.46 | 6.68 | 4.93±0.64 | 12.95 | 3.40 | 6.56 | 4.72±0.61 | 12.87 |
株高PH/cm | 5.80 | 15.78 | 11.13±1.73 | 15.57 | 5.88 | 14.64 | 10.47±1.58 | 15.05 |
叶片数NL | 4.00 | 6.20 | 5.79±0.32 | 5.50 | 4.00 | 6.00 | 5.58±0.40 | 7.11 |
SPAD值SPAD value | 38.74 | 56.56 | 47.09±3.36 | 7.14 | 41.42 | 67.66 | 50.10±4.22 | 8.43 |
第1片真叶面积LA of the first true leaf/cm2 | 6.96 | 17.42 | 11.41±2.38 | 20.85 | 3.58 | 16.43 | 8.29±2.33 | 28.04 |
表2 不同处理下棉花幼苗的形态指标
Table 2 Indexes of cotton seedlings under different treatments
性状Trait | CK | ST | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
极小值 Min. | 极大值 Max. | 均值 Mean | 变异系数 CV/% | 极小值 Min. | 极大值 Max. | 均值 Mean | 变异系数 CV/% | |
出苗率ER/% | 0.45 | 0.98 | 0.83±0.09 | 10.46 | 0.60 | 1.00 | 0.87±0.09 | 9.94 |
下胚轴长HL/cm | 3.46 | 6.68 | 4.93±0.64 | 12.95 | 3.40 | 6.56 | 4.72±0.61 | 12.87 |
株高PH/cm | 5.80 | 15.78 | 11.13±1.73 | 15.57 | 5.88 | 14.64 | 10.47±1.58 | 15.05 |
叶片数NL | 4.00 | 6.20 | 5.79±0.32 | 5.50 | 4.00 | 6.00 | 5.58±0.40 | 7.11 |
SPAD值SPAD value | 38.74 | 56.56 | 47.09±3.36 | 7.14 | 41.42 | 67.66 | 50.10±4.22 | 8.43 |
第1片真叶面积LA of the first true leaf/cm2 | 6.96 | 17.42 | 11.41±2.38 | 20.85 | 3.58 | 16.43 | 8.29±2.33 | 28.04 |
指标Index | 出苗率ER | 下胚轴长HL | 株高PH | 叶片数NL | SPAD值SPAD value |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
下胚轴长HL | 0.214* | ||||
株高PH | 0.235* | 0.475** | |||
叶片数NL | 0.133 | 0.099 | 0.357** | ||
SPAD值SPAD value | 0.135 | 0.160 | 0.114 | -0.189 | |
第1片真叶面积 LA of the first ture leaf | 0.161 | 0.058 | 0.448** | 0.242* | 0.016 |
表3 不同指标的相关性分析
Table 3 Correlation analysis of various indexes
指标Index | 出苗率ER | 下胚轴长HL | 株高PH | 叶片数NL | SPAD值SPAD value |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
下胚轴长HL | 0.214* | ||||
株高PH | 0.235* | 0.475** | |||
叶片数NL | 0.133 | 0.099 | 0.357** | ||
SPAD值SPAD value | 0.135 | 0.160 | 0.114 | -0.189 | |
第1片真叶面积 LA of the first ture leaf | 0.161 | 0.058 | 0.448** | 0.242* | 0.016 |
指标Index | F1 | F2 | F3 | F4 |
---|---|---|---|---|
出苗率ER | 0.505 | 0.260 | 0.126 | 0.803 |
下胚轴长HL | 0.606 | 0.394 | -0.578 | -0.170 |
株高PH | 0.857 | -0.013 | -0.061 | -0.250 |
叶片数NL | 0.535 | -0.575 | -0.163 | 0.137 |
SPAD值SPAD value | 0.158 | 0.787 | 0.350 | -0.165 |
第1片真叶面积LA of the first true leaf | 0.611 | -0.287 | 0.607 | -0.222 |
特征值 Eigen values | 2.042 | 1.255 | 0.871 | 0.831 |
贡献率 Contributive ratio/% | 34.034 | 20.910 | 14.513 | 13.842 |
累计贡献率 Cumulative contributive ratio /% | 34.034 | 54.944 | 69.456 | 83.298 |
表4 主成分分析及贡献率
Table 4 Principal component analysis and contribution rate
指标Index | F1 | F2 | F3 | F4 |
---|---|---|---|---|
出苗率ER | 0.505 | 0.260 | 0.126 | 0.803 |
下胚轴长HL | 0.606 | 0.394 | -0.578 | -0.170 |
株高PH | 0.857 | -0.013 | -0.061 | -0.250 |
叶片数NL | 0.535 | -0.575 | -0.163 | 0.137 |
SPAD值SPAD value | 0.158 | 0.787 | 0.350 | -0.165 |
第1片真叶面积LA of the first true leaf | 0.611 | -0.287 | 0.607 | -0.222 |
特征值 Eigen values | 2.042 | 1.255 | 0.871 | 0.831 |
贡献率 Contributive ratio/% | 34.034 | 20.910 | 14.513 | 13.842 |
累计贡献率 Cumulative contributive ratio /% | 34.034 | 54.944 | 69.456 | 83.298 |
品种编号Variety ID | F1 | F2 | F3 | F4 | μ(X1 ) | μ(X2 ) | μ(X3 ) | μ(X4 ) | D值 D value | 综合排序Comprehensive order |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 1.027 | 0.551 | -0.350 | -2.636 | 0.594 | 0.485 | 0.430 | 0.000 | 0.438 | 30 |
2 | 1.092 | 0.325 | 1.657 | 0.008 | 0.606 | 0.444 | 0.873 | 0.359 | 0.569 | 5 |
3 | -0.014 | -1.352 | 2.063 | -0.414 | 0.399 | 0.143 | 0.963 | 0.302 | 0.414 | 43 |
4 | 0.316 | -1.209 | 1.108 | -0.743 | 0.461 | 0.169 | 0.752 | 0.257 | 0.403 | 46 |
5 | 0.350 | -0.176 | 0.339 | -0.436 | 0.467 | 0.354 | 0.582 | 0.299 | 0.430 | 38 |
6 | 1.378 | -0.117 | 1.020 | -0.435 | 0.660 | 0.365 | 0.733 | 0.299 | 0.537 | 8 |
7 | -0.950 | -0.751 | -0.112 | 0.359 | 0.223 | 0.251 | 0.483 | 0.407 | 0.306 | 78 |
8 | 1.340 | 0.538 | 1.204 | -0.848 | 0.653 | 0.483 | 0.774 | 0.243 | 0.561 | 6 |
9 | -0.354 | 1.785 | -0.274 | -0.096 | 0.335 | 0.706 | 0.447 | 0.345 | 0.449 | 25 |
10 | 0.677 | 0.708 | -1.074 | 0.995 | 0.528 | 0.513 | 0.271 | 0.493 | 0.475 | 20 |
11 | 0.961 | -0.330 | -0.131 | -0.465 | 0.582 | 0.327 | 0.479 | 0.295 | 0.452 | 24 |
12 | 2.005 | 0.078 | -2.304 | 0.833 | 0.778 | 0.400 | 0.000 | 0.471 | 0.499 | 12 |
13 | 0.902 | 0.593 | 0.139 | -0.471 | 0.571 | 0.493 | 0.538 | 0.294 | 0.499 | 13 |
表5 不同品种的综合评价
Table 5 Comprehensive evaluation of different varieties
品种编号Variety ID | F1 | F2 | F3 | F4 | μ(X1 ) | μ(X2 ) | μ(X3 ) | μ(X4 ) | D值 D value | 综合排序Comprehensive order |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 1.027 | 0.551 | -0.350 | -2.636 | 0.594 | 0.485 | 0.430 | 0.000 | 0.438 | 30 |
2 | 1.092 | 0.325 | 1.657 | 0.008 | 0.606 | 0.444 | 0.873 | 0.359 | 0.569 | 5 |
3 | -0.014 | -1.352 | 2.063 | -0.414 | 0.399 | 0.143 | 0.963 | 0.302 | 0.414 | 43 |
4 | 0.316 | -1.209 | 1.108 | -0.743 | 0.461 | 0.169 | 0.752 | 0.257 | 0.403 | 46 |
5 | 0.350 | -0.176 | 0.339 | -0.436 | 0.467 | 0.354 | 0.582 | 0.299 | 0.430 | 38 |
6 | 1.378 | -0.117 | 1.020 | -0.435 | 0.660 | 0.365 | 0.733 | 0.299 | 0.537 | 8 |
7 | -0.950 | -0.751 | -0.112 | 0.359 | 0.223 | 0.251 | 0.483 | 0.407 | 0.306 | 78 |
8 | 1.340 | 0.538 | 1.204 | -0.848 | 0.653 | 0.483 | 0.774 | 0.243 | 0.561 | 6 |
9 | -0.354 | 1.785 | -0.274 | -0.096 | 0.335 | 0.706 | 0.447 | 0.345 | 0.449 | 25 |
10 | 0.677 | 0.708 | -1.074 | 0.995 | 0.528 | 0.513 | 0.271 | 0.493 | 0.475 | 20 |
11 | 0.961 | -0.330 | -0.131 | -0.465 | 0.582 | 0.327 | 0.479 | 0.295 | 0.452 | 24 |
12 | 2.005 | 0.078 | -2.304 | 0.833 | 0.778 | 0.400 | 0.000 | 0.471 | 0.499 | 12 |
13 | 0.902 | 0.593 | 0.139 | -0.471 | 0.571 | 0.493 | 0.538 | 0.294 | 0.499 | 13 |
品种编号Variety ID | F1 | F2 | F3 | F4 | μ(X1 ) | μ(X2 ) | μ(X3 ) | μ(X4 ) | D值 D value | 综合排序Comprehensive order |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
14 | -0.539 | 0.071 | -0.689 | 0.335 | 0.300 | 0.399 | 0.356 | 0.404 | 0.352 | 64 |
15 | 1.215 | 0.469 | -0.063 | -1.007 | 0.629 | 0.470 | 0.494 | 0.222 | 0.497 | 14 |
16 | -0.402 | -0.211 | 0.681 | -0.029 | 0.326 | 0.348 | 0.658 | 0.354 | 0.393 | 50 |
17 | -0.223 | 0.686 | -0.611 | -0.841 | 0.360 | 0.509 | 0.373 | 0.244 | 0.380 | 55 |
18 | 3.189 | -1.027 | -1.075 | 0.708 | 1.000 | 0.202 | 0.270 | 0.454 | 0.584 | 4 |
19 | -0.087 | -0.374 | -0.557 | -2.070 | 0.385 | 0.319 | 0.385 | 0.077 | 0.316 | 73 |
20 | -2.138 | 2.754 | 1.488 | 0.588 | 0.000 | 0.880 | 0.836 | 0.438 | 0.437 | 33 |
21 | -1.022 | 2.719 | -1.147 | -0.560 | 0.210 | 0.874 | 0.255 | 0.282 | 0.396 | 49 |
22 | 0.125 | 1.146 | -0.290 | 0.560 | 0.425 | 0.592 | 0.444 | 0.434 | 0.471 | 21 |
23 | 0.286 | 0.062 | 0.501 | -0.609 | 0.455 | 0.397 | 0.618 | 0.276 | 0.438 | 31 |
24 | 0.168 | -1.350 | -0.142 | -0.439 | 0.433 | 0.144 | 0.476 | 0.299 | 0.345 | 69 |
25 | 0.405 | 0.633 | 1.004 | 0.321 | 0.477 | 0.500 | 0.729 | 0.402 | 0.513 | 9 |
26 | -1.335 | 1.130 | 1.755 | -0.359 | 0.151 | 0.589 | 0.895 | 0.310 | 0.414 | 44 |
27 | -0.134 | 1.065 | 1.174 | -0.446 | 0.376 | 0.577 | 0.767 | 0.298 | 0.480 | 16 |
28 | -0.689 | -0.616 | -0.725 | 0.064 | 0.272 | 0.275 | 0.348 | 0.367 | 0.302 | 80 |
29 | -0.119 | -1.071 | 0.703 | -0.272 | 0.379 | 0.194 | 0.663 | 0.321 | 0.371 | 56 |
30 | 0.511 | 0.480 | -0.476 | -0.889 | 0.497 | 0.472 | 0.403 | 0.238 | 0.431 | 37 |
31 | -0.081 | -0.324 | -1.036 | -1.210 | 0.386 | 0.328 | 0.279 | 0.194 | 0.321 | 71 |
32 | 0.000 | -0.551 | -1.903 | -0.230 | 0.401 | 0.287 | 0.088 | 0.327 | 0.307 | 76 |
33 | -0.307 | -0.529 | 1.950 | 0.220 | 0.344 | 0.291 | 0.938 | 0.388 | 0.439 | 29 |
34 | 0.218 | 1.441 | -0.754 | -0.631 | 0.442 | 0.645 | 0.341 | 0.273 | 0.447 | 26 |
35 | 0.071 | 0.051 | 0.845 | -1.657 | 0.415 | 0.395 | 0.694 | 0.133 | 0.410 | 45 |
36 | -1.206 | -0.934 | 0.347 | 0.719 | 0.175 | 0.218 | 0.584 | 0.456 | 0.303 | 79 |
37 | -0.299 | 0.153 | 0.257 | -0.126 | 0.345 | 0.413 | 0.564 | 0.341 | 0.399 | 48 |
38 | -0.640 | -0.355 | -1.008 | 0.529 | 0.281 | 0.322 | 0.285 | 0.430 | 0.318 | 72 |
39 | -0.949 | -1.373 | 0.319 | -0.161 | 0.223 | 0.139 | 0.578 | 0.336 | 0.282 | 82 |
40 | -0.355 | -0.958 | -1.122 | -0.725 | 0.335 | 0.214 | 0.260 | 0.260 | 0.279 | 85 |
41 | -0.619 | -0.976 | 0.962 | 0.736 | 0.285 | 0.211 | 0.720 | 0.458 | 0.370 | 57 |
42 | -0.628 | 1.046 | 0.776 | -0.210 | 0.284 | 0.574 | 0.679 | 0.330 | 0.431 | 35 |
43 | 0.091 | 0.392 | -0.728 | 1.331 | 0.419 | 0.456 | 0.347 | 0.539 | 0.436 | 34 |
44 | -0.660 | -0.156 | 0.934 | 0.188 | 0.278 | 0.358 | 0.714 | 0.384 | 0.390 | 51 |
45 | -1.134 | 0.698 | 0.016 | 0.481 | 0.189 | 0.511 | 0.511 | 0.423 | 0.364 | 59 |
46 | -1.109 | 0.971 | -0.827 | 0.701 | 0.193 | 0.560 | 0.325 | 0.453 | 0.352 | 65 |
47 | -1.430 | -1.333 | -0.560 | -0.099 | 0.133 | 0.147 | 0.384 | 0.345 | 0.215 | 90 |
48 | -0.233 | 0.552 | -0.246 | -0.200 | 0.358 | 0.485 | 0.453 | 0.331 | 0.401 | 47 |
49 | -1.917 | 0.888 | -1.230 | -0.343 | 0.042 | 0.545 | 0.236 | 0.312 | 0.247 | 89 |
50 | -0.414 | 3.424 | -0.608 | -1.400 | 0.324 | 1.001 | 0.373 | 0.168 | 0.475 | 19 |
51 | 0.048 | 0.372 | -1.678 | 0.655 | 0.410 | 0.453 | 0.137 | 0.447 | 0.381 | 54 |
表5 不同品种的综合评价 (续表Continued)
Table 5 Comprehensive evaluation of different varieties
品种编号Variety ID | F1 | F2 | F3 | F4 | μ(X1 ) | μ(X2 ) | μ(X3 ) | μ(X4 ) | D值 D value | 综合排序Comprehensive order |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
14 | -0.539 | 0.071 | -0.689 | 0.335 | 0.300 | 0.399 | 0.356 | 0.404 | 0.352 | 64 |
15 | 1.215 | 0.469 | -0.063 | -1.007 | 0.629 | 0.470 | 0.494 | 0.222 | 0.497 | 14 |
16 | -0.402 | -0.211 | 0.681 | -0.029 | 0.326 | 0.348 | 0.658 | 0.354 | 0.393 | 50 |
17 | -0.223 | 0.686 | -0.611 | -0.841 | 0.360 | 0.509 | 0.373 | 0.244 | 0.380 | 55 |
18 | 3.189 | -1.027 | -1.075 | 0.708 | 1.000 | 0.202 | 0.270 | 0.454 | 0.584 | 4 |
19 | -0.087 | -0.374 | -0.557 | -2.070 | 0.385 | 0.319 | 0.385 | 0.077 | 0.316 | 73 |
20 | -2.138 | 2.754 | 1.488 | 0.588 | 0.000 | 0.880 | 0.836 | 0.438 | 0.437 | 33 |
21 | -1.022 | 2.719 | -1.147 | -0.560 | 0.210 | 0.874 | 0.255 | 0.282 | 0.396 | 49 |
22 | 0.125 | 1.146 | -0.290 | 0.560 | 0.425 | 0.592 | 0.444 | 0.434 | 0.471 | 21 |
23 | 0.286 | 0.062 | 0.501 | -0.609 | 0.455 | 0.397 | 0.618 | 0.276 | 0.438 | 31 |
24 | 0.168 | -1.350 | -0.142 | -0.439 | 0.433 | 0.144 | 0.476 | 0.299 | 0.345 | 69 |
25 | 0.405 | 0.633 | 1.004 | 0.321 | 0.477 | 0.500 | 0.729 | 0.402 | 0.513 | 9 |
26 | -1.335 | 1.130 | 1.755 | -0.359 | 0.151 | 0.589 | 0.895 | 0.310 | 0.414 | 44 |
27 | -0.134 | 1.065 | 1.174 | -0.446 | 0.376 | 0.577 | 0.767 | 0.298 | 0.480 | 16 |
28 | -0.689 | -0.616 | -0.725 | 0.064 | 0.272 | 0.275 | 0.348 | 0.367 | 0.302 | 80 |
29 | -0.119 | -1.071 | 0.703 | -0.272 | 0.379 | 0.194 | 0.663 | 0.321 | 0.371 | 56 |
30 | 0.511 | 0.480 | -0.476 | -0.889 | 0.497 | 0.472 | 0.403 | 0.238 | 0.431 | 37 |
31 | -0.081 | -0.324 | -1.036 | -1.210 | 0.386 | 0.328 | 0.279 | 0.194 | 0.321 | 71 |
32 | 0.000 | -0.551 | -1.903 | -0.230 | 0.401 | 0.287 | 0.088 | 0.327 | 0.307 | 76 |
33 | -0.307 | -0.529 | 1.950 | 0.220 | 0.344 | 0.291 | 0.938 | 0.388 | 0.439 | 29 |
34 | 0.218 | 1.441 | -0.754 | -0.631 | 0.442 | 0.645 | 0.341 | 0.273 | 0.447 | 26 |
35 | 0.071 | 0.051 | 0.845 | -1.657 | 0.415 | 0.395 | 0.694 | 0.133 | 0.410 | 45 |
36 | -1.206 | -0.934 | 0.347 | 0.719 | 0.175 | 0.218 | 0.584 | 0.456 | 0.303 | 79 |
37 | -0.299 | 0.153 | 0.257 | -0.126 | 0.345 | 0.413 | 0.564 | 0.341 | 0.399 | 48 |
38 | -0.640 | -0.355 | -1.008 | 0.529 | 0.281 | 0.322 | 0.285 | 0.430 | 0.318 | 72 |
39 | -0.949 | -1.373 | 0.319 | -0.161 | 0.223 | 0.139 | 0.578 | 0.336 | 0.282 | 82 |
40 | -0.355 | -0.958 | -1.122 | -0.725 | 0.335 | 0.214 | 0.260 | 0.260 | 0.279 | 85 |
41 | -0.619 | -0.976 | 0.962 | 0.736 | 0.285 | 0.211 | 0.720 | 0.458 | 0.370 | 57 |
42 | -0.628 | 1.046 | 0.776 | -0.210 | 0.284 | 0.574 | 0.679 | 0.330 | 0.431 | 35 |
43 | 0.091 | 0.392 | -0.728 | 1.331 | 0.419 | 0.456 | 0.347 | 0.539 | 0.436 | 34 |
44 | -0.660 | -0.156 | 0.934 | 0.188 | 0.278 | 0.358 | 0.714 | 0.384 | 0.390 | 51 |
45 | -1.134 | 0.698 | 0.016 | 0.481 | 0.189 | 0.511 | 0.511 | 0.423 | 0.364 | 59 |
46 | -1.109 | 0.971 | -0.827 | 0.701 | 0.193 | 0.560 | 0.325 | 0.453 | 0.352 | 65 |
47 | -1.430 | -1.333 | -0.560 | -0.099 | 0.133 | 0.147 | 0.384 | 0.345 | 0.215 | 90 |
48 | -0.233 | 0.552 | -0.246 | -0.200 | 0.358 | 0.485 | 0.453 | 0.331 | 0.401 | 47 |
49 | -1.917 | 0.888 | -1.230 | -0.343 | 0.042 | 0.545 | 0.236 | 0.312 | 0.247 | 89 |
50 | -0.414 | 3.424 | -0.608 | -1.400 | 0.324 | 1.001 | 0.373 | 0.168 | 0.475 | 19 |
51 | 0.048 | 0.372 | -1.678 | 0.655 | 0.410 | 0.453 | 0.137 | 0.447 | 0.381 | 54 |
品种编号Variety ID | F1 | F2 | F3 | F4 | μ(X1 ) | μ(X2 ) | μ(X3 ) | μ(X4 ) | D值 D value | 综合排序Comprehensive order |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
权重Index weight(Wi ) | 0.409 | 0.251 | 0.174 | 0.166 | ||||||
52 | 0.216 | -0.101 | 0.340 | 0.366 | 0.442 | 0.368 | 0.583 | 0.408 | 0.442 | 28 |
53 | 1.350 | 0.415 | -0.759 | -1.973 | 0.655 | 0.460 | 0.340 | 0.091 | 0.457 | 23 |
54 | -0.519 | -1.691 | -0.659 | 0.260 | 0.304 | 0.082 | 0.362 | 0.393 | 0.274 | 87 |
55 | -0.360 | -0.105 | -2.014 | -0.874 | 0.334 | 0.367 | 0.063 | 0.240 | 0.280 | 83 |
56 | -1.336 | -0.505 | 0.231 | 0.637 | 0.151 | 0.295 | 0.559 | 0.445 | 0.306 | 77 |
57 | 1.057 | -0.044 | -0.912 | 0.262 | 0.600 | 0.378 | 0.306 | 0.394 | 0.459 | 22 |
58 | 1.967 | 0.663 | 0.516 | 2.678 | 0.771 | 0.505 | 0.622 | 0.722 | 0.671 | 3 |
59 | 0.148 | -0.227 | -0.911 | 0.531 | 0.429 | 0.345 | 0.307 | 0.430 | 0.388 | 52 |
60 | 2.336 | 0.124 | 2.039 | 0.477 | 0.840 | 0.408 | 0.958 | 0.423 | 0.681 | 2 |
61 | -1.417 | -0.023 | 1.140 | 0.400 | 0.136 | 0.382 | 0.759 | 0.413 | 0.350 | 67 |
62 | 0.279 | 1.356 | 0.379 | 0.282 | 0.454 | 0.629 | 0.591 | 0.396 | 0.511 | 10 |
63 | -1.103 | 0.356 | 0.425 | -0.151 | 0.195 | 0.450 | 0.602 | 0.338 | 0.352 | 63 |
64 | -1.436 | 0.219 | -0.924 | 1.559 | 0.132 | 0.425 | 0.304 | 0.570 | 0.309 | 75 |
65 | -1.113 | -1.279 | -0.850 | 1.999 | 0.193 | 0.156 | 0.320 | 0.629 | 0.280 | 84 |
66 | 0.273 | 0.903 | 0.393 | 0.108 | 0.453 | 0.548 | 0.594 | 0.373 | 0.487 | 15 |
67 | -0.308 | 0.113 | -0.380 | -0.542 | 0.344 | 0.406 | 0.424 | 0.285 | 0.363 | 60 |
68 | 0.613 | -1.061 | 0.540 | 0.598 | 0.517 | 0.195 | 0.627 | 0.439 | 0.442 | 27 |
69 | 0.242 | -0.345 | 0.554 | -0.762 | 0.447 | 0.324 | 0.630 | 0.255 | 0.415 | 42 |
70 | -0.349 | -0.368 | 0.595 | -0.175 | 0.336 | 0.320 | 0.639 | 0.334 | 0.383 | 53 |
71 | 1.377 | -0.385 | -1.426 | -0.543 | 0.660 | 0.317 | 0.193 | 0.285 | 0.431 | 36 |
72 | 0.275 | -1.284 | -1.992 | -0.855 | 0.453 | 0.156 | 0.068 | 0.242 | 0.277 | 86 |
73 | -0.955 | -1.147 | -1.314 | 0.578 | 0.222 | 0.180 | 0.218 | 0.437 | 0.247 | 88 |
74 | 0.254 | -0.702 | 2.228 | -0.155 | 0.449 | 0.260 | 1.000 | 0.337 | 0.477 | 17 |
75 | -0.795 | -0.333 | 0.882 | -0.454 | 0.252 | 0.326 | 0.702 | 0.297 | 0.355 | 62 |
76 | 2.530 | 1.958 | 0.373 | 4.730 | 0.876 | 0.738 | 0.590 | 1.000 | 0.814 | 1 |
77 | -0.761 | -0.112 | 0.156 | -0.006 | 0.259 | 0.366 | 0.542 | 0.357 | 0.350 | 66 |
78 | 0.349 | -1.681 | -0.735 | 1.564 | 0.467 | 0.084 | 0.345 | 0.570 | 0.368 | 58 |
79 | 0.892 | -0.445 | 1.805 | -0.914 | 0.569 | 0.306 | 0.906 | 0.234 | 0.504 | 11 |
80 | -0.815 | -0.627 | 0.480 | -1.129 | 0.249 | 0.273 | 0.614 | 0.205 | 0.309 | 74 |
81 | -1.155 | -1.347 | -0.032 | 1.627 | 0.185 | 0.144 | 0.501 | 0.579 | 0.295 | 81 |
82 | 0.169 | -2.149 | 0.934 | -0.003 | 0.433 | 0.000 | 0.714 | 0.358 | 0.360 | 61 |
83 | -0.225 | -0.902 | -0.019 | -0.140 | 0.359 | 0.224 | 0.504 | 0.339 | 0.347 | 68 |
84 | 0.398 | 0.658 | -1.187 | -0.372 | 0.476 | 0.504 | 0.246 | 0.308 | 0.415 | 41 |
85 | 0.311 | 0.956 | 0.062 | -0.048 | 0.460 | 0.558 | 0.521 | 0.352 | 0.476 | 18 |
86 | -0.556 | 0.820 | 0.301 | 1.042 | 0.297 | 0.533 | 0.574 | 0.500 | 0.438 | 32 |
87 | -0.710 | -0.353 | -0.295 | 0.215 | 0.268 | 0.323 | 0.443 | 0.387 | 0.332 | 70 |
88 | 2.127 | -0.268 | 0.349 | -1.284 | 0.801 | 0.338 | 0.585 | 0.184 | 0.543 | 7 |
89 | 0.926 | -0.731 | -0.633 | -0.100 | 0.575 | 0.255 | 0.368 | 0.345 | 0.421 | 40 |
90 | -0.559 | -0.035 | 0.797 | 1.296 | 0.297 | 0.380 | 0.684 | 0.534 | 0.424 | 39 |
表5 不同品种的综合评价 (续表Continued)
Table 5 Comprehensive evaluation of different varieties
品种编号Variety ID | F1 | F2 | F3 | F4 | μ(X1 ) | μ(X2 ) | μ(X3 ) | μ(X4 ) | D值 D value | 综合排序Comprehensive order |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
权重Index weight(Wi ) | 0.409 | 0.251 | 0.174 | 0.166 | ||||||
52 | 0.216 | -0.101 | 0.340 | 0.366 | 0.442 | 0.368 | 0.583 | 0.408 | 0.442 | 28 |
53 | 1.350 | 0.415 | -0.759 | -1.973 | 0.655 | 0.460 | 0.340 | 0.091 | 0.457 | 23 |
54 | -0.519 | -1.691 | -0.659 | 0.260 | 0.304 | 0.082 | 0.362 | 0.393 | 0.274 | 87 |
55 | -0.360 | -0.105 | -2.014 | -0.874 | 0.334 | 0.367 | 0.063 | 0.240 | 0.280 | 83 |
56 | -1.336 | -0.505 | 0.231 | 0.637 | 0.151 | 0.295 | 0.559 | 0.445 | 0.306 | 77 |
57 | 1.057 | -0.044 | -0.912 | 0.262 | 0.600 | 0.378 | 0.306 | 0.394 | 0.459 | 22 |
58 | 1.967 | 0.663 | 0.516 | 2.678 | 0.771 | 0.505 | 0.622 | 0.722 | 0.671 | 3 |
59 | 0.148 | -0.227 | -0.911 | 0.531 | 0.429 | 0.345 | 0.307 | 0.430 | 0.388 | 52 |
60 | 2.336 | 0.124 | 2.039 | 0.477 | 0.840 | 0.408 | 0.958 | 0.423 | 0.681 | 2 |
61 | -1.417 | -0.023 | 1.140 | 0.400 | 0.136 | 0.382 | 0.759 | 0.413 | 0.350 | 67 |
62 | 0.279 | 1.356 | 0.379 | 0.282 | 0.454 | 0.629 | 0.591 | 0.396 | 0.511 | 10 |
63 | -1.103 | 0.356 | 0.425 | -0.151 | 0.195 | 0.450 | 0.602 | 0.338 | 0.352 | 63 |
64 | -1.436 | 0.219 | -0.924 | 1.559 | 0.132 | 0.425 | 0.304 | 0.570 | 0.309 | 75 |
65 | -1.113 | -1.279 | -0.850 | 1.999 | 0.193 | 0.156 | 0.320 | 0.629 | 0.280 | 84 |
66 | 0.273 | 0.903 | 0.393 | 0.108 | 0.453 | 0.548 | 0.594 | 0.373 | 0.487 | 15 |
67 | -0.308 | 0.113 | -0.380 | -0.542 | 0.344 | 0.406 | 0.424 | 0.285 | 0.363 | 60 |
68 | 0.613 | -1.061 | 0.540 | 0.598 | 0.517 | 0.195 | 0.627 | 0.439 | 0.442 | 27 |
69 | 0.242 | -0.345 | 0.554 | -0.762 | 0.447 | 0.324 | 0.630 | 0.255 | 0.415 | 42 |
70 | -0.349 | -0.368 | 0.595 | -0.175 | 0.336 | 0.320 | 0.639 | 0.334 | 0.383 | 53 |
71 | 1.377 | -0.385 | -1.426 | -0.543 | 0.660 | 0.317 | 0.193 | 0.285 | 0.431 | 36 |
72 | 0.275 | -1.284 | -1.992 | -0.855 | 0.453 | 0.156 | 0.068 | 0.242 | 0.277 | 86 |
73 | -0.955 | -1.147 | -1.314 | 0.578 | 0.222 | 0.180 | 0.218 | 0.437 | 0.247 | 88 |
74 | 0.254 | -0.702 | 2.228 | -0.155 | 0.449 | 0.260 | 1.000 | 0.337 | 0.477 | 17 |
75 | -0.795 | -0.333 | 0.882 | -0.454 | 0.252 | 0.326 | 0.702 | 0.297 | 0.355 | 62 |
76 | 2.530 | 1.958 | 0.373 | 4.730 | 0.876 | 0.738 | 0.590 | 1.000 | 0.814 | 1 |
77 | -0.761 | -0.112 | 0.156 | -0.006 | 0.259 | 0.366 | 0.542 | 0.357 | 0.350 | 66 |
78 | 0.349 | -1.681 | -0.735 | 1.564 | 0.467 | 0.084 | 0.345 | 0.570 | 0.368 | 58 |
79 | 0.892 | -0.445 | 1.805 | -0.914 | 0.569 | 0.306 | 0.906 | 0.234 | 0.504 | 11 |
80 | -0.815 | -0.627 | 0.480 | -1.129 | 0.249 | 0.273 | 0.614 | 0.205 | 0.309 | 74 |
81 | -1.155 | -1.347 | -0.032 | 1.627 | 0.185 | 0.144 | 0.501 | 0.579 | 0.295 | 81 |
82 | 0.169 | -2.149 | 0.934 | -0.003 | 0.433 | 0.000 | 0.714 | 0.358 | 0.360 | 61 |
83 | -0.225 | -0.902 | -0.019 | -0.140 | 0.359 | 0.224 | 0.504 | 0.339 | 0.347 | 68 |
84 | 0.398 | 0.658 | -1.187 | -0.372 | 0.476 | 0.504 | 0.246 | 0.308 | 0.415 | 41 |
85 | 0.311 | 0.956 | 0.062 | -0.048 | 0.460 | 0.558 | 0.521 | 0.352 | 0.476 | 18 |
86 | -0.556 | 0.820 | 0.301 | 1.042 | 0.297 | 0.533 | 0.574 | 0.500 | 0.438 | 32 |
87 | -0.710 | -0.353 | -0.295 | 0.215 | 0.268 | 0.323 | 0.443 | 0.387 | 0.332 | 70 |
88 | 2.127 | -0.268 | 0.349 | -1.284 | 0.801 | 0.338 | 0.585 | 0.184 | 0.543 | 7 |
89 | 0.926 | -0.731 | -0.633 | -0.100 | 0.575 | 0.255 | 0.368 | 0.345 | 0.421 | 40 |
90 | -0.559 | -0.035 | 0.797 | 1.296 | 0.297 | 0.380 | 0.684 | 0.534 | 0.424 | 39 |
类别 Class | 出苗率 ER/% | 下胚轴长 HL/cm | 株高 PH/cm | 叶片数 NL | SPAD值 SPAD value | 第1片真叶面积LA of the first ture leaf/cm2 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
第Ⅰ类ClassⅠ | 0.97±0.04 a | 4.42±0.34 a | 10.41±0.59 a | 5.67±0.58 a | 47.74±2.15 b | 11.01±1.08 a |
第Ⅱ类Class Ⅱ | 0.91±0.07 ab | 4.92±0.34 a | 10.83±1.79 a | 5.54±0.33 a | 52.50±4.66 a | 8.26±2.17 b |
第Ⅲ类Class Ⅲ | 0.87±0.09 b | 4.80±0.58 a | 10.65±1.50 a | 5.57±0.43 a | 50.19±3.64 ab | 8.61±2.43 b |
第Ⅳ类Class Ⅳ | 0.84±0.09 b | 4.33±0.57 a | 9.60±1.49 a | 5.64±0.39 a | 47.71±4.48 b | 6.89±1.58 b |
表6 不同类群在盐胁迫下的表型
Table 6 Phenotype of different class under stress treatment
类别 Class | 出苗率 ER/% | 下胚轴长 HL/cm | 株高 PH/cm | 叶片数 NL | SPAD值 SPAD value | 第1片真叶面积LA of the first ture leaf/cm2 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
第Ⅰ类ClassⅠ | 0.97±0.04 a | 4.42±0.34 a | 10.41±0.59 a | 5.67±0.58 a | 47.74±2.15 b | 11.01±1.08 a |
第Ⅱ类Class Ⅱ | 0.91±0.07 ab | 4.92±0.34 a | 10.83±1.79 a | 5.54±0.33 a | 52.50±4.66 a | 8.26±2.17 b |
第Ⅲ类Class Ⅲ | 0.87±0.09 b | 4.80±0.58 a | 10.65±1.50 a | 5.57±0.43 a | 50.19±3.64 ab | 8.61±2.43 b |
第Ⅳ类Class Ⅳ | 0.84±0.09 b | 4.33±0.57 a | 9.60±1.49 a | 5.64±0.39 a | 47.71±4.48 b | 6.89±1.58 b |
1 | MUNNS R. Comparative physiology of salt and water stress [J]. Plant Cell Environ., 2002, 25(2):239-250. |
2 | 邵华伟,孙九胜,胡伟,等.新疆盐碱地分布特点和成因及改良利用技术研究进展[J].黑龙江农业科学,2014(11):160-164. |
SHAO H W, SUN J S, HU W, et al.. Research progress on distribution characteristics causes and improved utilization technology of saline-alkali land in Xinjiang [J]. Heilongjiang Agric. Sci., 2014(11):160-164. | |
3 | 李雪源,王俊铎,郑巨云,等.新疆棉花产业发展与供给侧改革[J].中国棉花,2017,44(8):1-7. |
LI X Y, WANG J D, ZHENG J Y, et al.. Cotton industry development and the supply-side reform in Xinjiang, China [J]. China Cotton, 2017, 44(8):1-7. | |
4 | 孙小芳,刘友良,陈沁.棉花耐盐性研究进展[J].棉花学报,1998(3):7-13. |
SUN X F, LIU Y L, CHEN Q. Recent progresses in studies on salinity tolerance in cotton [J]. Cotton Sci., 1998(3):7-13. | |
5 | 张国伟,路海玲,张雷,等.棉花萌发期和苗期耐盐性评价及耐盐指标筛选[J].应用生态学报,2011,22(8):2045-2053. |
ZHANG G W, LU H L, ZHANG L, et al.. Salt tolerance evaluation of cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) at its germinating and seedling stages and selection of related indices [J]. Chin. J. Appl. Ecol., 2011, 22(8): 2045-2053 | |
6 | 戴海芳,武辉,阿曼古丽·买买提阿力,等.不同基因型棉花苗期耐盐性分析及其鉴定指标筛选[J].中国农业科学,2014,47(7):1290-1300. |
DAI H F, WU H, AMANGULI M M T A L, et al.. Analysis of salttolerance and determination of salt-tolerance evaluation indicators in cotton seedling of different genotypes [J]. Sci. Agric. Sin., 2014, 47(7):1290-1300. | |
7 | 刘祎,钱玉源,张海娜,等.12个陆地棉品种(系)苗期耐盐性鉴定评价[J].作物研究,2017,31(1):37-41. |
LIU Y, QIAN Y Y, ZHANG H N, et al.. Identification and evaluation of 12 varieties or lines of Gossypium hirsutum based on seedling salt tolerance [J]. Crop Res., 2017, 31(1):37-41. | |
8 | 魏俊梅.24个棉花种质资源耐盐性差异比较[J].中国棉花,2014,41(5):14-16. |
WEI J M. Comparison on salt tolerance of 24 cotton germplasm resources [J]. China Cotton, 2014, 41(5):14-16. | |
9 | 柏军华,王克如,初振东,等.叶面积测定方法的比较研究[J].石河子大学学报(自然科学版), 2005, 23(2):216-218. |
10 | 白灯莎·买买提艾力,李寒暝,张少民,等.不同棉花品种种子萌发阶段耐盐性综合评价[J].新疆农业科学,2011,48(1):18-24. |
MAIMAITIAILI B D S, LI H M, ZHANG S M, et al.. Assesment on the salt resistance of seven cotton varieties (Gossypium hirsutum L.) during germination stage [J]. Xinjiang Agric. Sci., 2011, 48(1):18-24. | |
11 | 王宁,冯克云,南宏宇,等.甘肃河西走廊棉区棉花萌发期和苗期耐盐性鉴定与评价[J].干旱地区农业研究,2018,36(1):148-155. |
WANG N, FENG K Y, NAN H Y, et al.. Salt tolerance identification and evaluation of cotton at its germinationand seedling stages in Hexi area of Gansu [J]. Agric. Res. Arid Areas, 2018, 36(1):148-155. | |
12 | 徐佳陵,曾文官,袁延超,等.陆地棉种质资源萌发出苗期耐盐性鉴定[J].山东农业科学,2017,49(9):32-36. |
XU J L, ZENG W G, YUAN Y C, et al.. Salt tolerance evaluationat germination stage of upland cotton germplasms [J]. Shandong Agric. Sci. 2017, 49(9):32-36. | |
13 | 张香桂,沈新莲,徐鹏,等.棉花苗期耐盐性鉴定方法与应用[J].农业与技术,2017,37(19):1-4. |
14 | 杨阳.棉花耐盐材料的筛选及耐盐相关功能标记的开发[D].南京:南京农业大学,2015. |
YANG Y. Screening salt-tolerant germplasm and development of functional markers related to salt stress in cotton [D]. Nanjing: Nanjing Agricultural University, 2015. | |
15 | 王立红,李星星,孙影影,等.外源水杨酸对NaCl胁迫下棉花幼苗生长生理特性的影响[J].西北植物学报,2017,37(1):154-162. |
WANG L H, LI X X, SUN Y Y, et al.. Effects of exogenous salicylic acid on the physiological characteristics and growth of cotton seedlings under NaCl stress [J]. Acta Bot. Bor-Occid. Sin., 2017, 37(1):154-162. | |
16 | 刘剑光,肖松华,吴巧娟,等.盐胁迫对棉花出苗及其成苗的效应[J].江西农业学报, 2011,23(11):53-55. |
LIU J G, XIAO S H, WU Q J, et al.. Effects of salt stress on seedling emergence and seedling formation of cotton [J]. Acta Agric. Jiangxi, 2011, 23(11):53-55. | |
17 | 陈振,张巨松,严青青,等.不同基因型海岛棉根系形态参数对混合盐碱胁迫的响应[J].新疆农业科学,2019,56(11):1961-1970. |
CHEN Z, ZHANG J S, YAN Q Q, et al.. Responses of root morphological parameters to complex saline-alkali stress among island cotton varieties with different genotypes [J]. Xinjiang Agric. Sci., 2019, 56(11):1961-1970. | |
18 | 郭慧娟.不同盐碱胁迫下棉花离子组响应特征及离子稳态机制研究[D].新疆石河子:石河子大学,2019. |
GUO H J. Tonome response characteristics and ion homeostatic mechanism of cotton under different salt stresses [D]. Xinjiang Shihezi: Shihezi University, 2019. | |
19 | 李双男,郭慧娟,王晶,等.不同盐碱胁迫对棉花种子萌发的影响[J].种子,2018,37(1):38-45. |
LI S N, GUO H J, WANG J, et al.. Effect of different saline and alkaline stress on seed [J]. Seed, 2018, 37(1):38-45. | |
20 | 许艳超,韦洋洋,李振庆,等.复合盐碱胁迫下半野生棉苗期耐盐性综合评价及其关键生理指标的变化[J].棉花学报,2018,30(3):231-241. |
XU Y C, WEI Y Y, LI Z Q, et al.. Integrated evaluation andthe physiological and biochemical responses of semi wild cottonunder complex salt alkali stress [J]. Cotton Sci., 2018, 30(3):231-241. | |
21 | 严青青,张巨松,李星星,等.盐碱胁迫对海岛棉种子萌发及幼苗根系生长的影响[J].作物学报,2019,45(1):100-110. |
YAN Q Q, ZHANG J S, LI X X, et al.. Effects of salinity stress on seed germination and root growth of seedlings in island cotton [J]. Acta Agron. Sin., 2019, 45(1):100-110. | |
22 | 王宁,南宏宇,冯克云.10个棉花品种在河西走廊棉区的耐盐性评价[J].甘肃农业科技,2016(3):23-26. |
23 | 王秀萍,张国新,鲁雪林,等.棉花苗期耐盐性鉴定方法和鉴定指标研究[J].河北农业科学,2011,15(3):8-11. |
WANG X P, ZHANG G X, LU X L, et al.. Study on identification methods and indexes of salt tolerance of cotton seedlings [J]. J. Hebei Agric. Sci., 2011, 15(3):8-11. | |
24 | 杨涛,李生梅,黄雅婕,等.海岛棉品种(系)萌发期盐胁迫综合评价[J].新疆农业大学学报,2019,42(5):313-319. |
YANG T, LI S M, HUANG Y J, et al.. Comprehensive evaluation of salt stress in Gossypium barbadense L. varieties (lines) during germination period [J]. J. Xinjiang Agric.Univ., 2019, 42(5):313-319. |
[1] | 周雨青, 杨永飞, 葛常伟, 沈倩, 张思平, 刘绍东, 马慧娟, 陈静, 刘瑞华, 李士丛, 赵新华, 李存东, 庞朝友. 基于WGCNA的棉花子叶抗冷相关共表达模块鉴定[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2022, 24(4): 52-62. |
[2] | 李生梅, 张大伟, 迪丽拜尔·迪力买买提, 魏鑫, 芮存, 杨涛, 耿世伟, 高文伟. 减量灌溉对转ScALDH21基因棉花农艺性状、产量和品质的影响[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2021, 23(9): 152-159. |
[3] | 骆丽莎, 廖桂平, 刘凡, 官春云. 基于冠层光谱特征参数的油菜品种识别[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2021, 23(7): 93-106. |
[4] | 张旭1,何俊峰1,陈佛文1,李继福1*,吴启侠1,谭京红1,邹家龙2. 麦秆还田对直播和移栽棉花产量及氮素吸收的影响[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2021, 23(3): 122-131. |
[5] | 张特,康正华,赵强*,聂志勇,王蜜蜂,崔延楠. 施氮量及打顶方式对棉花营养积累与分配及产量的影响[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2021, 23(3): 139-147. |
[6] | 马盼盼1,2,赵曾强1,2,祝建波2,孙国清3*. 棉花耐旱耐盐碱生理和分子机制研究进展[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2021, 23(2): 27-36. |
[7] | 王国宁, 张艳, 宋俊丽, 杨君, 王省芬, 吴立强, 张桂寅. 黄萎病胁迫下抗病陆地棉茎组织lncRNA的鉴定与分析[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2021, 23(12): 29-41. |
[8] | 吴雪琴, 崔延楠, 赵强. 化学打顶后使用外源物质对棉花脱叶催熟及产量品质的影响[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2021, 23(12): 151-160. |
[9] | 李憬霖, 刘绍东, 张思平, 陈静, 刘瑞华, 沈倩, 李阳, 马慧娟, 赵新华, 庞朝友. 棉花品种资源全生育期抗旱性评价及抗旱指标筛选[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2021, 23(10): 52-65. |
[10] | 刘梦丽1,李进2,张军高2,周小云2,杜鹏程1,郭庆元1*,雷斌2*. 棉花红腐病菌不同致病力菌株间毒素活性差异[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2020, 22(7): 99-105. |
[11] | 刘松涛1,田春丽1,曹雯梅1,郑贝贝1,李鹏程2,董合林2. 基于不同土壤质地棉花根际微生物和酶活性特征分析[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2020, 22(2): 73-79. |
[12] | 段怡红,阎媛媛,陈丽婷,李青,张冬梅,孙正文,张艳,马峙英,王省芬*. 陆地棉开花时间相关基因GhMYB44的克隆与功能验证[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2020, 22(12): 29-38. |
[13] | 郭光艳§,杨亚玲§,曹璐,刘伟,秘彩莉*. 小麦RF2类bZIP转录因子TabZIP3参与植物盐胁迫反应[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2019, 21(6): 20-27. |
[14] | 孙帆1§,籍东武2§,黄菲1,王银晓1,谢自艳1,王文生1*. DNA甲基化抑制剂对水稻幼苗生长及耐盐性的影响[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2019, 21(6): 28-35. |
[15] | 王潭刚1§,马丽1§,李克富1,王冀川2*,李慧琴1,吉光鹏1,郝全有1,崔建强1,胡宝1. 不同密度下封顶方式对南疆棉花生长及产量性状的影响[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2019, 21(6): 110-116. |
阅读次数 | ||||||
全文 |
|
|||||
摘要 |
|
|||||