不同时间尺度胡杨液流速率与土壤因子的关系

doi:10.13304/j.nykjdb.2021.0388

中国农业科技导报 ›› 2022, Vol. 24 ›› Issue (6): 196-205.DOI: 10.13304/j.nykjdb.2021.0388

• 生物制造资源生态 • 上一篇

不同时间尺度胡杨液流速率与土壤因子的关系

黄雅茹¹^,²(), 马迎宾¹^,³, 李永华⁴(), 董雪¹^,², 刘源¹^,³, 于猛¹^,³, 韩春霞¹^,², 菅凯敏⁵, 马海峰⁶

^1.中国林业科学研究院沙漠林业实验中心，内蒙古磴口荒漠生态系统国家定位观测研究站，内蒙古磴口 015200
^2.乌兰布和沙漠综合治理国家长期科研基地，内蒙古磴口015200
^3.国家林业和草原局防沙治沙工程技术研究中心，内蒙古磴口 015200
^4.中国林业科学研究院生态保护与修复研究所，北京 100091
^5.巴彦淖尔市林业和草原事业发展中心，内蒙古巴彦淖尔 015000
^6.巴彦淖尔市林业和草原资源保护中心，内蒙古巴彦淖尔 015000

收稿日期:2021-05-08 接受日期:2021-07-26 出版日期:2022-06-15 发布日期:2022-06-21
通讯作者: 李永华
作者简介:黄雅茹 E-mail：hu_angyaru@126.com；
基金资助:
中央级公益性科研院所基本科研业务费专项(CAFYBB2020ZE005);国家自然科学基金项目(32001374)

Relationships Between Soil Factors and Populus euphratica’s Sap Flow at Different Time Scales

Yaru HUANG¹^,²(), Yingbin MA¹^,³, Yonghua LI⁴(), Xue DONG¹^,², Yuan LIU¹^,³, Meng YU¹^,³, Chunxia HAN¹^,², Kaimin JIAN⁵, Haifeng MA⁶

^1.Inner Mongolia Dengkou Desert Ecosystem National Observation Research Station，Experimental Center of Desert Forestry，Chinese Academy of Forestry，Inner Mongolia Dengkou 015200，China
^2.National Long-Term Scientific Research Base of comprehensive control in Ulan Buh Desert，National Forestry and Grassland Administration，Inner Mongolia Dengkou 015200，China
^3.Combat Desertification Engineering Technology Research Center，National Forestry and Grassland Administration，Inner Mongolia Dengkou 015200，China
^4.Institute of Ecological Conservation and Restoration，Beijing 100091，China
^5.Bayannur City Forestry and Grassland Business Development Center，Inner Mongolia Bayannur 015000，China
^6.Bayannur City Forestry and Grassland Resources Protection Center，Inner Mongolia Bayannur 015000，China

Received:2021-05-08 Accepted:2021-07-26 Online:2022-06-15 Published:2022-06-21
Contact: Yonghua LI

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

为揭示土壤因子对胡杨液流的影响是否存在时间尺度差异，对库姆塔格沙漠东南部胡杨液流速率及20、50、100、150和200 cm土层的土壤含水量（soil water content，SWC）、土壤温度（soil temperature，Ts）进行持续 5个月的同步观测。结果表明，月尺度下，SWC_200cm是胡杨液流速率变化的主要影响因子，单独能解释94.9%的液流速率变化；日尺度下，Ts_200cm、SWC_50cm、SWC_20cm、SWC_200cm4个因子可以共同解释胡杨93.2%的液流速率变化，其中，Ts_200cm可以解释液流速率变化的90.3%，对胡杨液流速率影响最大；小时尺度下，Ts_200cm对胡杨液流的影响最大，可以解释液流速率变化的51.6%。随着时间尺度的扩大，对液流速率变化的影响因子由多变少，可靠性由小变大。由此表明，根据土壤含水量及土壤温度预测小时尺度胡杨液流速率需要较多的参数，且可靠性较小；而预测月尺度液流速率需要较少的参数，且可靠性较大。因此，预测月尺度胡杨液流速率更为合适。

关键词: 胡杨, 液流, 库姆塔格沙漠, 土壤因子

Abstract:

In order to reveal the influence of soil factors on the sap flow at different time scale of Populus euphratica in Kumtag Desert， the sap flow of Populus euphratica and soil factors， such as soil water content （SWC） and soil temperature （Ts）， were observed synchronously for 5 months. The results were followed， on the monthly scale，SWC_200cm was the main factor influencing the sap flow of Populus euphratica， which could explain 94.9% of sap flow changes. On the daily scale， Ts_200cm， SWC_50cm， SWC_20cm and SWC_200cm had greater influence on the sap flow changes of Populus euphratica， which 93.2% of the sap flow changes of Populus euphratica was explained by these 4 factors， and Ts_200cm was the main influence factor， which could explain 90.3% of the sap flow changes of Populus euphratica. On the hourly scale，Ts_200cm was the biggest influence factor on the sap flow velocity， which could explain 51.6% of the sap flow change. With the expansion of time scale， the number of factors affecting the flow rate changed from more to less， and the reliability changed from small to large. It showed that， based on the soil water content and soil temperature， the predicting of hourly sap flow rate in Populus euphratica required more parameters and had the less reliability， while the predicting of monthly sap flow rate required fewer parameters and had the more reliable. It was more appropriate to predict the sap flow rate of Populus euphratica at a monthly scale.

Key words: Populus euphratica, sap flow, Kumtag Desert, soil factors

中图分类号:

S792

黄雅茹, 马迎宾, 李永华, 董雪, 刘源, 于猛, 韩春霞, 菅凯敏, 马海峰. 不同时间尺度胡杨液流速率与土壤因子的关系[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2022, 24(6): 196-205.

Yaru HUANG, Yingbin MA, Yonghua LI, Xue DONG, Yuan LIU, Meng YU, Chunxia HAN, Kaimin JIAN, Haifeng MA. Relationships Between Soil Factors and Populus euphratica’s Sap Flow at Different Time Scales[J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2022, 24(6): 196-205.

图/表 4

参考文献 41

1	聂玉鸿,宗旭祥,何长福.困难立地条件下胡杨造林技术及效果分析[J].现代农业科技,2016(2):184-185.
2	BYENE K M, LAUENROTH W K, ADLER P B. Contrasting effects of precipitation manipulations on production in two sites within the central grassland region, USA [J]. Ecosystems, 2013, 6(6):1039-1051.
3	TANG Y K, WU X, CHEN Y M. Sap flow characteristics and physiological adjustments of two dominant tree species in pure and mixed plantations in the semi-arid Loess Plateau of China [J]. J. Arid Land, 2018, 10(6):833-849.
4	GUO Q Q, ZHANG W H. Sap flow of Abies georgei var. smithii and its relationship with the environment factors in the Tibetan subalpine region, China [J]. J. Mt. Sci., 2015, 12(6):1373-1382.
5	STEPPE K, VANDEGEHUCHTE M W, TOGNETTI R, et al.. Sap flow as a key trait in the understanding of plant hydraulic functioning [J]. Tree Physiol., 2015, 35(4):341-345.
6	GRANIER A. Sap flow measurements in Douglas-fir tree trunks by means of a new thermal method [J]. Ann. Sci. For., 1987, 44(1):1-14.
7	SMITH D M, ALLEN S J. Measurement of sap flow in plant stems [J]. J. Exp. Bot., 1996, 47(12):1833-1844.
8	LU P, URBAN L, ZHAO P. Granier’s thermal dissipation probre (TDP) method for measuring sap flow in trees: theory and practice [J]. Acta Bot. Sin., 2004, 46(6):631-646.
9	任启文,张岩,李联地,等.不同时间尺度下落叶松液流速率与森林小气候的关系[J].中南林业科技大学学报,2018,38(12):30-37, 44.
	REN Q W, ZHANG Y, LI L D, et al.. Relationship between sap flow velocity of Larix principis-rupprechtii and forest microclimate in different time scales [J]. J. Central South Univ. For. Technol., 2018, 38(12):30-37, 44.
10	徐先英,孙保平,丁国栋,等.干旱荒漠区典型固沙灌木液流动态变化及其对环境因子的响应[J].生态学报, 2007,28(3):895-905.
	XU X Y, SUN B P, DING G D, et al.. Sap flow patterns of three main sand-fixing shrubs and their responses to environmental factors in desert areas [J]. Acta Ecol. Sin., 2007, 28(3):895-905.
11	吴鹏,杨文斌,崔迎春,等.喀斯特区天峨槭(Acer wangchii)树干液流特征及其与环境因子的相关分析[J].生态学报,2017,37(22):7552-7567.
	WU P, YANG W B, CUI Y C, et al.. Characteristics of sap flow and correlation analysis with environmental factors of Acer wangchii in the Karst area [J]. Acta Ecol. Sin., 2017, 37(22):7552-7567.
12	姚依强,陈珂,王彦辉,等.华北落叶松树干液流速率主要影响因子及关系的时间尺度变化[J].干旱区资源与环境, 2017, 31(2):155-161.
	YAO Y Q, CHEN K, WANG Y H, et al.. Relationships between sap flow velocity of Larix principis-rupprechtii and environmental factors and their variation with time scales [J]. J. Arid Land Resour. Environ., 2017, 31(2):155-161.
13	赵天宇,关东海,苏里坦,等.环境因子对胡杨树干液流动态的影响[J].水土保持通报, 2015(6):15-20.
	ZHAO T Y, GUAN D H, SU L T, et al.. Effects of environmental factors on trunk sap flow of Populus Euphratica [J]. Bull. Soil Water Conserv., 2015(6):15-20.
14	赵梦炯,吴文俊,马超,等.陇南地区土壤水分及气象因子对油橄榄树干液流的响应特征[J].西北林学院学报,2020,35(5):104-109.
	ZHAO M J, WU W J, MA C, et al.. Influence of soil moisture and meteorological factors on stem sap flow of olive in Southern Gansu [J]. J. Northwest For. Univ., 2020, 35(5):104-109.
15	李洁,任启文,孙杰肖.张家口崇礼区3种优势树种蒸腾耗水特征研究[J].西北林学院学报,2018,33(6):40-46.
	LI J, REN Q W, SUN J X. Water consumption of three dominant tree species at Qingshuihe watershed of Chongli District in Zhangjiakou [J]. J. Northwest For. Univ., 2018, 33(6):40-46.
16	周翠鸣,顾大形,赵平,等.液流径向变化对尾巨桉单株日蒸腾量估算的影响[J].应用生态学报,2017,28(8):2445-2451.
	ZHOU C M, GU D X, HAO P, et al.. Effect of sap flow radial variation on daily transpiration estimation of Eucalyptus urophylla × Eucalyptus grandis [J]. Chin. J. Appl. Ecol., 2017, 28(8):2445-2451.
17	杨明杰,杨广,何新林,等.干旱区梭梭茎干液流特性及对土壤水分的响应[J].人民长江,2018,49(6):33-38.
18	魏新光,聂真义,刘守阳,等.黄土丘陵区枣林土壤水分动态及其对蒸腾的影响[J].农业机械学报,2015,46(6):130-140.
	WEI X G, NIE Z Y, LIU S Y, et al.. Soil moisture characteristics and its influence on Jujube Tree transpiration in Loess Hilly Region [J]. Trans. Chin. Soc. Agric. Mach., 2015, 46(6):130-140.
19	迟琳琳,韩辉,党宏忠,等.彰武松树干液流特征及其与环境因子间的关系[J].干旱区资源与环境,2020,34(1):186-191.
	CHI L L, HAN H, DANG H Z, et al.. Relationships between stem sap flow rate of Pinus densiflora Sieb.et Zucc.var.zhangwuensis and environmental factors [J]. J. Arid Land Resour. Environ., 2020,34(1):186-191.
20	党宏忠,却晓娥,冯金超,等.晋西黄土区苹果树边材液流速率对环境驱动的响应[J].应用生态学报,2019,30(3):823-831.
	DANG H Z, QUE X E, FENG J C, et al.. Response of sap flow rate of apple trees to environmental factors in Loess Platea of Western Shanxi Province, China [J]. Chin. J. Appl. Ecol., 2019, 30(3):823-831.
21	王玥,鄢春华,邱国玉.土壤温度对油松树干液流启动与停止的影响[J].北京大学学报(自然科学版),2019,55(3):580-586.
	WANG Y, YAN C H, QIU G Y. Soil temperature triggers sap flow onset and offset of Pinus tabulaeformis [J]. Acta Sci. Nat. Univ. Pekinensis, 2019, 55(3):580-586.
22	陈胜楠,孔喆,陈立欣,等.半干旱区城市环境下油松林分蒸腾特征及其影响因子[J].生态学报,2020,40(4):1269-1280.
	CHEN S N, KONG Z, CHEN L X, et al.. The stand transpiration characteristics of Pinus tabulaeformis and its influential factors in a semi-arid urban environment [J]. Acta Ecol. Sin., 2020, 40(4):1269-1280.
23	吕金林,何秋月,闫美杰,等.黄土丘陵区辽东栎树干液流特征对边材面积和土壤水分的响应[J].应用生态学报,2018,29(3):725-731.
	LYU J L, HE Q Y, YAN M J, et al.. Sap flow characteristics of Quercus liaotungensis in response to sapwood area and soil moisture in the loess hilly region, China [J]. Chin. J. Appl. Ecol., 2018, 29(3):725-731.
24	陈宝强,张建军,张艳婷,等.晋西黄土区辽东栎和山杨树干液流对环境因子的响应[J].应用生态学报,2016,27(3):746-754.
	CHEN B Q, ZHANG J J, ZHANG Y T, et al.. Whole-tree sap flow of Quercus liaotungensis and Populus davidiana in response to environmental factors in the loess plateau area of western Shanxi Province, northern China [J]. Chin. J. Appl. Ecol., 2016, 27(3):746-754.
25	任启文,张岩,李联地,等.不同时间尺度下落叶松液流速率与森林小气候的关系[J].中南林业科技大学学报,2018,38(12):30-37, 44.
	REN Q W, ZHANG Y, LI L D, et al.. Relationship between sap flow velocity of Larix principis-rupprechtii and forest microclimate in different time scales [J]. J. Central South Univ. For. Technol., 2018, 38(12):30-37, 44.
26	郝少荣,裴志永,段广东,等.不同时间尺度下环境因子与沙柳茎流关系的差异研究[J].干旱区资源与环境,2020,34(3):152-158.
	HAO S R, PEI Z Y, DUAN G D, et al.. Relationships between environmental factors and Salix psammophila’s sap flow at different time scales [J]. J. Arid Land Resour. Environ., 2020, 34(3):152-158.
27	崔鸿侠,唐万鹏,胡文杰,等.神农架2树种树干液流特征及与环境因子关系[J].西北林学院学报,2020,35(1):37-44.
	CUI H X, TANG W P, HU W J, et al.. Characteristics of the sap flow and correlation analysis with environmental factors of two tree species in Shennongjia [J]. J. Northwest For.Univ., 2020, 35(1):37-44.
28	赵春彦,司建华,冯起,等.胡杨(Populus euphratica)树干液流特征及其与环境因子的关系[J].中国沙漠,2014,34(3):718-724.
	ZHAO C Y, SI J H, FENG Q, et al.. Xylem sap flow of Populus euphratica in relation to environmental factors in the lower reaches of Heihe River [J]. J. Desert Res., 2014, 34(3):718-724.
29	热依兰·尔肯.塔里木河中游胡杨树干液流特征分析[D].乌鲁木齐:新疆大学,2013.
	REYILAN E K. Analysis of stem sap flow of Populus . euphratica in Middle Reaches of the Tarim River [D]. Urumqi: Xinjiang University, 2013.
30	杨丽.天然胡杨树体水分输移关系及影响因子研究[D].呼和浩特:内蒙古农业大学,2006.
	YANG L. A study on the moisture transport relationship of natural Populus euphratica and influence factors [D]. Hohhot: Inner Mongolia Agricultural University, 2006.
31	张小由,康尔泗,张智慧,等.黑河下游天然胡杨树干液流特征的试验研究[J].冰川冻土,2005(5):742-746.
	ZHANG X Y, KANG E S, ZHANG Z H, et al.. A study of the stem sap flux of Populus euphratica in the Lower Reaches of Heihe River [J]. J. Glaciol. Geocryol., 2005(5):742-746.
32	陈新均,王学全,卢琦,等.季节性河道土壤水分及其渗漏特征初探[J].干旱区研究,2020,37(1):97-104.
	CHEN X J, WANG X Q, LU Q, et al.. Soil moisture content and soil water infiltration in seasonal watercourse in arid area [J]. Arid Zone Res., 2020, 37(1):97-104.
33	黄雅茹,辛智鸣,罗红梅,等.乌兰布和沙漠中国沙棘果实成熟期茎干液流规律及其与环境因子的关系[J].生态学杂志,2015,34(11):3125-3131.
	HUANG Y R, XIN Z M, LUO H M, et al.. Stem sap flow dynamics of Hippophae rhamnoides L.subsp.sinensis Rousi in relation to environmental factors in Ulan Buh Desert during fruit stage [J]. Chin. J. Ecol., 2015, 34(11):3125-3131.
34	李浩,胡顺军,朱海,等.基于热扩散技术的梭梭树干液流特征研究[J].生态学报,2017,37(21):7187-7196.
	LI H, HU S J, ZHU H, et al.. Characterization of stem sap flow Haloxylon ammodendron by using thermal dissipation technology [J]. Acta Ecol. Sin., 2017, 37(21):7187-7196.
35	张利刚,曾凡江,刘镇,等.极端干旱区3种植物液流特征及其对环境因子的响应[J].干旱区研究,2013,30(1):115-121.
	ZHANG L G, ZENG F J, LIU Z, et al.. Sap flow characteristics of three plant species and their responses to environmental factors in an extremely arid region [J]. Arid Zone Res., 2013, 30(1):115-121.
36	许浩,张希明,闫海龙,等.塔克拉玛干沙漠腹地梭梭(Haloxylon ammodendron)蒸腾耗水规律[J].生态学报,2008,28(8):3713-3720.
	XU H, ZHANG X M, YAN H L, et al.. Water consumption and transpiration of Haloxylon ammodendron in hinterland of Taklimakan desert [J]. Acta Ecol. Sin., 2008, 28(8):3713-3720.
37	吴芳,陈云明,于占辉.黄土高原半干旱区刺槐生长盛期树干液流动态[J].植物生态学报,2010,34(4):469-476.
	WU F, CHEN Y M, YU Z H. Growing season sap-flow dynamics of Robinia pseudoacacia plantation in the semi-arid region of Loess Plateau, China [J]. Chin. J. Plant Ecol., 2010, 34(4):469-476.
38	张晓艳,褚建民,孟平,等.民勤绿洲荒漠过渡带梭梭(Haloxylon ammodendron (C.A.Mey) Bunge)树干液流特征及其对环境因子的响应[J].生态学报,2017,37(5):1525-1536.
	ZHANG X Y, CHU J M, MENG P, et al.. The effect of environmental factors on stem sap flow characteristics of Haloxylon ammodendron (C.A.Mey.) Bunge in Minqin oasis-desert [J]. Acta Ecol. Sin., 2017, 37(5):1525-1536.
39	买尔当·克依木,玉米提·哈力克,古丽比亚·乌买尔,等.胡杨树干液流日变化及其与气象因素的相关关系[J].冰川冻土,2018,40(1):166-175.
	MAIERDANG K Y M, ÜMÜT H L K, GULIBIYA W M E, et al.. Diel variation of Populus euphratica sap flow and its correlation with meteorological factors [J]. J. Glaciol. Geocryol., 2018, 40(1):166-175.
40	徐世琴,吉喜斌,金博文.典型荒漠植物沙拐枣茎干液流密度动态及其对环境因子的响应[J].应用生态学报, 2016, 27(2):14-22.
	XU S Q, JI X B, JIN B W. Dynamics of sap flow density in stems of typical desert shrub Calligonum mongolicum and its responses to environmental variables [J]. Chin. J. Appl. Ecol., 2016, 27(2):14-22.
41	司建华,冯起,张小由,等.极端干旱区荒漠河岸林胡杨生长季树干液流变化[J].中国沙漠,2007(3):442-447.
	SI J H, FENG Q, ZHANFG X Y, et al.. Sap flow of Populus Euphratica in desert riparian forest in extreme arid region during the growing season [J]. J. Desert Res., 2007(3):442-447.

时间尺度 Season	顺序Order	因子Factor	R²	回归方程 Regressions equation
月尺度 Monthly scale	1	SWC_200cm	0.949	Y=-55.216+1 172.110SWC_200cm
日尺度 Daily scale	1	Ts_200cm	0.903	Y=-11.162+1.028Ts_200cm
	2	SWC_50cm	0.918	Y=-24.772+1.414Ts_200cm+107.981SWC_50cm
	3	SWC_20cm	0.924	Y=-22.643+1.259Ts_200cm+83.181SWC_50cm+114.879SWC_20cm
	4	SWC_200cm	0.932	Y=8.676+1.907Ts_200cm+90.729SWC_50cm+159.142SWC_20cm-833.739SWC_200cm
小时尺度 Hourly scale	1	Ts_200cm	0.516	Y=-10.502+0.981Ts_200cm
	2	SWC_50cm	0.535	Y=-32.603+1.596Ts_200cm+176.443SWC_50cm
	3	SWC_100cm	0.564	Y=-67.732+1.801Ts_200cm+339.192SWC_50cm+145.386SWC_100cm
	4	Ts_20cm	0.641	Y=-94.494+1.436Ts_200cm+394.277SWC_50cm+433.601SWC_100cm-0.505Ts_20cm
	5	SWC_200cm	0.678	Y=71.097+4.768Ts_200cm+395.348SWC_50cm+512.750SWC_100cm-0.738Ts_20cm-4 355.887 SWC_200cm
	6	SWC_150cm	0.688	Y=4.809+2.978Ts_200cm+462.510SWC_50cm+362.028SWC_100cm-0.782Ts_20cm-4 499.741 SWC_200cm+869.738 SWC_150cm

时间尺度 Season	顺序Order	因子Factor	R²	回归方程 Regressions equation
月尺度 Monthly scale	1	SWC_200cm	0.949	Y=-55.216+1 172.110SWC_200cm
日尺度 Daily scale	1	Ts_200cm	0.903	Y=-11.162+1.028Ts_200cm
	2	SWC_50cm	0.918	Y=-24.772+1.414Ts_200cm+107.981SWC_50cm
	3	SWC_20cm	0.924	Y=-22.643+1.259Ts_200cm+83.181SWC_50cm+114.879SWC_20cm
	4	SWC_200cm	0.932	Y=8.676+1.907Ts_200cm+90.729SWC_50cm+159.142SWC_20cm-833.739SWC_200cm
小时尺度 Hourly scale	1	Ts_200cm	0.516	Y=-10.502+0.981Ts_200cm
	2	SWC_50cm	0.535	Y=-32.603+1.596Ts_200cm+176.443SWC_50cm
	3	SWC_100cm	0.564	Y=-67.732+1.801Ts_200cm+339.192SWC_50cm+145.386SWC_100cm
	4	Ts_20cm	0.641	Y=-94.494+1.436Ts_200cm+394.277SWC_50cm+433.601SWC_100cm-0.505Ts_20cm
	5	SWC_200cm	0.678	Y=71.097+4.768Ts_200cm+395.348SWC_50cm+512.750SWC_100cm-0.738Ts_20cm-4 355.887 SWC_200cm
	6	SWC_150cm	0.688	Y=4.809+2.978Ts_200cm+462.510SWC_50cm+362.028SWC_100cm-0.782Ts_20cm-4 499.741 SWC_200cm+869.738 SWC_150cm

[1]	王檬檬1,党宏忠2*,李钢铁1,冯金超2,闫晶秋子1,胡杨1,李星1,杨超1. 晋西黄土区苹果树液流特征及其与环境因子的关系[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2020, 22(7): 140-147.
[2]	黄雅茹1，李永华2*，辛智鸣1，马迎宾1，董雪1，李新乐1，段瑞兵1，罗凤敏1，边凯1. 乌兰布和沙漠人工梭梭夏季茎干液流变化特征及其与气象因子的关系[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2020, 22(7): 155-165.
[3]	未丽,徐秉良,雷江丽,刘水,唐益雄,阴翠翠,吴燕民. 胡杨叶绿素a/b结合蛋白基因的克隆及序列特性分析[J]. , 2008, 10(4): 63-69.

不同时间尺度胡杨液流速率与土壤因子的关系

Relationships Between Soil Factors and Populus euphratica’s Sap Flow at Different Time Scales

RichHTML

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 4

参考文献 41

相关文章 3

编辑推荐

Metrics