中国农业科技导报 ›› 2022, Vol. 24 ›› Issue (3): 67-76.DOI: 10.13304/j.nykjdb.2021.0573
王玉1(), 李春光2, 刘欢2, 张月华3, 冯晓民2, 李耀光2, 李怀奇2, 景延秋1(
), 孙觅2(
)
收稿日期:
2121-07-12
接受日期:
2021-12-09
出版日期:
2022-03-15
发布日期:
2022-03-14
通讯作者:
景延秋,孙觅
作者简介:
王玉E-mail: wangyu_111a@163.com
基金资助:
Yu WANG1(), Chunguang LI2, Huan LIU2, Yuehua ZHANG3, Xiaomin FENG2, Yaoguang LI2, Huaiqi LI2, Yanqiu JING1(
), Mi SUN2(
)
Received:
2121-07-12
Accepted:
2021-12-09
Online:
2022-03-15
Published:
2022-03-14
Contact:
Yanqiu JING,Mi SUN
摘要:
为明确烤烟叶片叶绿体超微结构与质体色素降解产物含量的关系,以云烟87为试验材料,对未熟和适熟的上、中、下部位烟叶的叶绿体超微结构进行观测,并对不同部位烟叶的质体色素降解产物含量进行测定。结果表明,未熟烟叶细胞叶绿体中淀粉颗粒数、嗜锇颗粒数、基粒数和高基粒片层占比在不同部位间差异显著,均表现为上部叶>中部叶>下部叶;适熟烟叶细胞叶绿体中淀粉颗粒数、嗜锇颗粒数与未熟烟叶在不同部位间的差异表现一致,而基粒数、高基粒片层占比与未熟烟叶的差异表现相反,为上部叶<中部叶<下部叶,且不同部位间差异显著;烤烟烟叶的质体色素降解产物含量在不同部位间也存在显著差异,表现为上部叶>中部叶>下部叶。质体色素降解产物含量与未熟和适熟烟叶的淀粉颗粒数、嗜锇颗粒数呈极显著正相关,与未熟烟叶的基粒数、高基粒片层占比呈极显著正相关,与适熟烟叶的基粒数、高基粒片层占比呈极显著负相关。综上,未熟烟叶细胞叶绿体中基粒数、基粒片层垛叠程度和适熟烟叶的基粒片层结构解体程度与质体色素降解产物的含量有较强相关性,此结果为筛选烤烟优质品种和提升香气质量的研究提供了理论依据。
中图分类号:
王玉, 李春光, 刘欢, 张月华, 冯晓民, 李耀光, 李怀奇, 景延秋, 孙觅. 烤烟叶片叶绿体超微结构与质体色素降解产物的关系初探[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2022, 24(3): 67-76.
Yu WANG, Chunguang LI, Huan LIU, Yuehua ZHANG, Xiaomin FENG, Yaoguang LI, Huaiqi LI, Yanqiu JING, Mi SUN. Study on Chloroplast Ultrastructure of Flue-cured Tobacco Leaves and Its Relationship with Degrading Products of Plastid Pigment[J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2022, 24(3): 67-76.
部位 Leaf position | 成熟度Maturity | 判定标准 Judgement standard |
---|---|---|
下部叶 LL | 未熟 Unripe | 叶面黄绿色,4~5成黄,茸毛未脱落,主脉开始变白 Leaf yellow-green, 40% to 50% yellow, no hair fall off, main vein turn white |
适熟 Ripe | 叶面黄绿色,6~7成黄,茸毛部分脱落,主脉变白1/2以上 Leaf yellow-green, 60% to 70% yellow, part hairs fall off, 1/2 main vein white | |
中部叶 ML | 未熟 Unripe | 叶面黄绿色,6~7成黄,茸毛部分脱落,主脉变白1/2以上 Leaf yellow-green, 60% to 70% yellow, part hairs fall off, 1/2 main vein white |
适熟 Ripe | 叶面浅黄色,8~9成黄,茸毛较多脱落,主脉变白3/4以上 Leaf light yellow, 80% to 90% yellow, most hairs fall off, 3/4 main vein white | |
上部叶 UL | 未熟 Unripe | 叶面浅黄色,7~8成黄,茸毛较多脱落,主脉变白2/3以上 Leaf light yellow, 70% to 80% yellow, most hairs fall off, 2/3 main vein white |
适熟 Ripe | 叶面基本全黄,9~10成黄,茸毛较多脱落,主脉全白 Leaf yellow, 90% to 100% yellow, most hairs fall off, main vein all white |
表1 不同部位烟叶成熟度标准
Table 1 Criteria for maturity level of flue?cured tobacco from different leaf position
部位 Leaf position | 成熟度Maturity | 判定标准 Judgement standard |
---|---|---|
下部叶 LL | 未熟 Unripe | 叶面黄绿色,4~5成黄,茸毛未脱落,主脉开始变白 Leaf yellow-green, 40% to 50% yellow, no hair fall off, main vein turn white |
适熟 Ripe | 叶面黄绿色,6~7成黄,茸毛部分脱落,主脉变白1/2以上 Leaf yellow-green, 60% to 70% yellow, part hairs fall off, 1/2 main vein white | |
中部叶 ML | 未熟 Unripe | 叶面黄绿色,6~7成黄,茸毛部分脱落,主脉变白1/2以上 Leaf yellow-green, 60% to 70% yellow, part hairs fall off, 1/2 main vein white |
适熟 Ripe | 叶面浅黄色,8~9成黄,茸毛较多脱落,主脉变白3/4以上 Leaf light yellow, 80% to 90% yellow, most hairs fall off, 3/4 main vein white | |
上部叶 UL | 未熟 Unripe | 叶面浅黄色,7~8成黄,茸毛较多脱落,主脉变白2/3以上 Leaf light yellow, 70% to 80% yellow, most hairs fall off, 2/3 main vein white |
适熟 Ripe | 叶面基本全黄,9~10成黄,茸毛较多脱落,主脉全白 Leaf yellow, 90% to 100% yellow, most hairs fall off, main vein all white |
图1 不同部位未熟和适熟烟叶的叶绿体结构特征A:上部叶,未熟;B:中部叶,未熟;C:下部叶,未熟;D:上部叶,适熟;E:中部叶,适熟;F:下部叶,适熟。Chl—叶绿体;Cw—细胞壁;Is—细胞间隙;M—线粒体;Th—基粒类囊体;GL—基粒片层;SL—基质片层;O—嗜锇颗粒;SG—淀粉粒。
Fig. 1 Chloroplast ultrastructure character in unripe and ripe leaves of different leaf positionsA:UL, unripe; B:ML, unripe; C:LL, unripe; D:UL, ripe; E:ML, ripe; F:LL, ripe. Chl—Chloroplast; Cw—Cell wall; Is—Intercellular space; M—Mitochondrion; Th—Thylakoid; GL—Grana lamella; SL—Stroma lamella; O—Osmiophilic granule; SG—Starch grain.
成熟度 Maturity | 部位 Leaf position | 淀粉颗粒数 Starch granules number | 嗜锇颗粒数 Osmiophilic number | 基粒数 Granum number |
---|---|---|---|---|
未熟 Unripe | 上部叶UL | 2.43±0.18 a | 5.76±0.14 a | 16.18±0.41 a |
中部叶ML | 1.66±0.18 b | 3.89±0.16 b | 14.07±0.24 b | |
下部叶LL | 1.24±0.21 c | 2.73±0.22 c | 8.29±0.42 c | |
适熟 Ripe | 上部叶UL | 3.44±0.24 a | 9.85±1.39 a | 7.79±0.57 c |
中部叶ML | 2.59±0.23 b | 6.30±0.86 b | 11.92±1.63 b | |
下部叶LL | 1.65±0.26 c | 3.47±0.65 c | 14.44±0.91 a |
表2 不同部位未熟和适熟烟叶单个叶绿体的超微结构统计
Table 2 Statistics of chloroplasts ultrastructure in flue?cured tobacco leaves of different positions at unripe and ripe stages
成熟度 Maturity | 部位 Leaf position | 淀粉颗粒数 Starch granules number | 嗜锇颗粒数 Osmiophilic number | 基粒数 Granum number |
---|---|---|---|---|
未熟 Unripe | 上部叶UL | 2.43±0.18 a | 5.76±0.14 a | 16.18±0.41 a |
中部叶ML | 1.66±0.18 b | 3.89±0.16 b | 14.07±0.24 b | |
下部叶LL | 1.24±0.21 c | 2.73±0.22 c | 8.29±0.42 c | |
适熟 Ripe | 上部叶UL | 3.44±0.24 a | 9.85±1.39 a | 7.79±0.57 c |
中部叶ML | 2.59±0.23 b | 6.30±0.86 b | 11.92±1.63 b | |
下部叶LL | 1.65±0.26 c | 3.47±0.65 c | 14.44±0.91 a |
图4 不同部位适熟烟叶的新植二烯含量及占比注:不同小写字母表示不同部位烟叶差异在P<0.05水平显著。
Fig. 4 NC content and proportion in ripe flue?cured tobacco leaves of different leaf positionsNote: Different lowercase letters indicate significant differences between different leaf positions at P<0.05 level.
图5 不同部位适熟烟叶类胡萝卜素降解产物含量注:不同小写字母表示不同部位烟叶在P<0.05水平差异显著。
Fig. 5 CARDPC content and proportion in ripe flue?cured tobacco leaves of different leaf positionNote:Different lowercase letters indicate significant differences between different leaf positions at P<0.05 level.
香味物质 Aroma constituents | 上部叶 UL | 中部叶 ML | 下部叶 LL | |
---|---|---|---|---|
中性香气成分 NACC | 中性香气成分 NACC | 847.89±28.14 a | 732.44±13.92 b | 584.01±21.16 c |
叶绿素降解产物 CHLDPC | 新植二烯 Neophytadiene | 695.51±9.35 a | 522.04±27.94 b | 416.81±15.68 c |
类胡萝卜素降解产物 CARDPC | 6-甲基-5-庚烯-2-醇 6-methyl-5-Hepten-2-ol | 2.72±0.03 a | 0.41±0.10 c | 1.36±0.30 b |
6-甲基-5-庚烯-2-酮 6-methyl-5-hepten-2-one | 0.62±0.15 a | 0.07±0.05 b | 0.18±0.18 b | |
芳樟醇 Linalool | 0.76±0.04 a | 0.90±0.13 a | 0.89±0.24 a | |
异佛尔酮 Isophorone | 0.17±0.03 a | 0.17±0.02 a | 0.11±0.05 b | |
氧化异佛尔酮 Isophorone oxide | 0.22±0.01 b | 0.19±0.02 b | 0.40±0.12 a | |
藏花醛 Safranal | 0.15±0.01 a | 0.16±0.04 a | 0.08±0.01 b | |
β-环柠檬醛 β-cyclocitral | 0.56±0.02 a | 0.53±0.11 a | 0.59±0.33 a | |
β-大马酮 β-damascone | 21.15±0.25 a | 15.46±0.40 b | 15.70±2.06 b | |
β-二氢大马酮 β-dihydro damascenone | 13.51±0.26 a | 9.29±0.75 b | 9.68±0.76 b | |
3-羟基-β-二氢大马酮 3-hydroxy-β-damascone | 3.50±0.06 a | 3.11±0.91 a | 3.49±1.14 a | |
香叶基丙酮 Geranylacetone | 3.13±0.02 a | 2.19±0.46 b | 3.46±0.81 a | |
二氢猕猴桃内脂 Dihydroactinidiolide | 2.88±0.04 a | 2.12±0.49 b | 2.27±0.40 b | |
巨豆三烯酮1 Megastigmatrienone 1 | 2.44±0.04 ab | 3.26±0.88 a | 1.99±1.11 b | |
巨豆三烯酮2 Megastigmatrienone 2 | 10.59±0.16 b | 11.80±0.51 a | 9.82±0.88 c | |
巨豆三烯酮3 Megastigmatrienone 3 | 1.30±0.29 b | 2.94±0.59 a | 1.09±0.25 b | |
巨豆三烯酮4 Megastigmatrienone 4 | 13.51±0.16 b | 15.45±0.44 a | 9.84±2.32 c | |
螺岩兰草酮 Solavetivone | 1.31±0.16 b | 2.67±0.63 a | 0.45±0.23 c | |
法尼基丙酮 Farnesyl acetone | 13.27±0.17 a | 9.16±0.39 b | 11.62±2.00 a |
表3 不同部位适熟烟叶的香味物质含量 (μg·g-1)
Table 3 Contents of aroma constituents in ripe flue?cured tobacco leaves of different leaf position
香味物质 Aroma constituents | 上部叶 UL | 中部叶 ML | 下部叶 LL | |
---|---|---|---|---|
中性香气成分 NACC | 中性香气成分 NACC | 847.89±28.14 a | 732.44±13.92 b | 584.01±21.16 c |
叶绿素降解产物 CHLDPC | 新植二烯 Neophytadiene | 695.51±9.35 a | 522.04±27.94 b | 416.81±15.68 c |
类胡萝卜素降解产物 CARDPC | 6-甲基-5-庚烯-2-醇 6-methyl-5-Hepten-2-ol | 2.72±0.03 a | 0.41±0.10 c | 1.36±0.30 b |
6-甲基-5-庚烯-2-酮 6-methyl-5-hepten-2-one | 0.62±0.15 a | 0.07±0.05 b | 0.18±0.18 b | |
芳樟醇 Linalool | 0.76±0.04 a | 0.90±0.13 a | 0.89±0.24 a | |
异佛尔酮 Isophorone | 0.17±0.03 a | 0.17±0.02 a | 0.11±0.05 b | |
氧化异佛尔酮 Isophorone oxide | 0.22±0.01 b | 0.19±0.02 b | 0.40±0.12 a | |
藏花醛 Safranal | 0.15±0.01 a | 0.16±0.04 a | 0.08±0.01 b | |
β-环柠檬醛 β-cyclocitral | 0.56±0.02 a | 0.53±0.11 a | 0.59±0.33 a | |
β-大马酮 β-damascone | 21.15±0.25 a | 15.46±0.40 b | 15.70±2.06 b | |
β-二氢大马酮 β-dihydro damascenone | 13.51±0.26 a | 9.29±0.75 b | 9.68±0.76 b | |
3-羟基-β-二氢大马酮 3-hydroxy-β-damascone | 3.50±0.06 a | 3.11±0.91 a | 3.49±1.14 a | |
香叶基丙酮 Geranylacetone | 3.13±0.02 a | 2.19±0.46 b | 3.46±0.81 a | |
二氢猕猴桃内脂 Dihydroactinidiolide | 2.88±0.04 a | 2.12±0.49 b | 2.27±0.40 b | |
巨豆三烯酮1 Megastigmatrienone 1 | 2.44±0.04 ab | 3.26±0.88 a | 1.99±1.11 b | |
巨豆三烯酮2 Megastigmatrienone 2 | 10.59±0.16 b | 11.80±0.51 a | 9.82±0.88 c | |
巨豆三烯酮3 Megastigmatrienone 3 | 1.30±0.29 b | 2.94±0.59 a | 1.09±0.25 b | |
巨豆三烯酮4 Megastigmatrienone 4 | 13.51±0.16 b | 15.45±0.44 a | 9.84±2.32 c | |
螺岩兰草酮 Solavetivone | 1.31±0.16 b | 2.67±0.63 a | 0.45±0.23 c | |
法尼基丙酮 Farnesyl acetone | 13.27±0.17 a | 9.16±0.39 b | 11.62±2.00 a |
参数 Parameter | 成熟度 Maturity | 淀粉颗粒数 Starch granules number in single chloroplast | 嗜锇颗粒数 Osmiophilic number | 基粒数 Granum number |
---|---|---|---|---|
新植二烯含量 NC | 未熟 Unripe | 0.98** | 0.98** | 0.89** |
适熟 Ripe | 0.95** | 0.90** | -0.90** | |
类胡萝卜素 降解产物含量 CARDPC | 未熟 Unripe | 0.97** | 0.96** | 0.83** |
适熟 Ripe | 0.94** | 0.94** | -0.92** |
表4 烟叶单个叶绿体超微结构指标与质体色素降解产物含量的相关性分析
Table 4 Correlation analysis between single chloroplast ultrastructure and plastid pigment degrading products content of flue?cured tobacco
参数 Parameter | 成熟度 Maturity | 淀粉颗粒数 Starch granules number in single chloroplast | 嗜锇颗粒数 Osmiophilic number | 基粒数 Granum number |
---|---|---|---|---|
新植二烯含量 NC | 未熟 Unripe | 0.98** | 0.98** | 0.89** |
适熟 Ripe | 0.95** | 0.90** | -0.90** | |
类胡萝卜素 降解产物含量 CARDPC | 未熟 Unripe | 0.97** | 0.96** | 0.83** |
适熟 Ripe | 0.94** | 0.94** | -0.92** |
参数 Parameter | 成熟度 Maturity | 基粒片层数Granum lamella number | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0~5 | 6~10 | 11~15 | 16~20 | 21~30 | 31~40 | ||
新植二烯含量 NC | 未熟Unripe | -0.90** | -0.66 | -0.90** | -0.10 | 0.80* | 0.93** |
适熟Ripe | 0.89** | 0.89** | -0.17 | -0.51 | -0.89** | -0.96** | |
类胡萝卜素 降解产物含量 CARDPC | 未熟Unripe | -0.84** | -0.69* | -0.80* | -0.10 | 0.78* | 0.89** |
适熟Ripe | 0.86** | 0.83** | -0.15 | -0.53 | -0.86** | -0.88** |
表5 烟叶叶绿体基粒片层数与质体色素降解产物含量的相关性分析
Table 5 Correlation analysis of chloroplast granum lamella number and plastid pigment degrading products content of flue?cured tobacco
参数 Parameter | 成熟度 Maturity | 基粒片层数Granum lamella number | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0~5 | 6~10 | 11~15 | 16~20 | 21~30 | 31~40 | ||
新植二烯含量 NC | 未熟Unripe | -0.90** | -0.66 | -0.90** | -0.10 | 0.80* | 0.93** |
适熟Ripe | 0.89** | 0.89** | -0.17 | -0.51 | -0.89** | -0.96** | |
类胡萝卜素 降解产物含量 CARDPC | 未熟Unripe | -0.84** | -0.69* | -0.80* | -0.10 | 0.78* | 0.89** |
适熟Ripe | 0.86** | 0.83** | -0.15 | -0.53 | -0.86** | -0.88** |
1 | REIKO M, NORIKO N, TAKUYA I, et al.. An essential role of a TatC homologue of a ΔpH-dependent protein transporter in thylakoid membrane formation during chloroplast development in Arabidopsis thaliana [J]. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 2001, 98(18):10499-10504. |
2 | 龙春芬,孙焕良,刘燕,等.烟草叶绿体及其色素研究进展[J].作物研究,2012,26(6):740-744. |
LONG C F, SUN H L, LIU Y, et al.. Research progress on tobacco chloroplasts and pigment [J]. Crop Res., 2012, 26(06):740-744. | |
3 | 周冀衡,杨虹琦,林桂华,等.不同烤烟产区烟叶中主要挥发性香气物质的研究[J].湖南农业大学学报(自然科学版),2004(1):20-23. |
ZHOU J, YANG H Q, LIN G H, et al.. Studies on the main volatile aroma components in tobacco from different flue-cured tobacco production regions [J]. J. Hunan Agric. Univ. (Nat. Sci.), 2004(1):20-23. | |
4 | 卢秀萍,许仪,许自成,等.不同烤烟基因型主要挥发性香气物质含量的变异分析[J].河南农业大学学报,2007(2):142-148. |
LU X P, XU Y, XU Z C, et al.. Analysis of variation of the contents of main volatile aroma components in different flue-cured tobacco genotypes [J]. J. Henan Agric.Univ., 2007(2):142-148. | |
5 | 任春琼,焦芳婵,苏娟,等.四个烤烟品种成熟叶叶绿体亚显微结构的比较[J].电子显微学报,2016,35(3):275-281. |
REN C Q, JIAO F C, SU J, et al.. Comparative study on the ultrastructure of chloroplast of four flue-cured tobacco varieties [J]. J. Chin. Elec. Micro. Soc., 2016, 35(3):275-281. | |
6 | 云菲,刘国顺,宋晶.不同光照强度下氮素对烤烟质体色素降解产物及品质的影响[J].中国烟草学报,2014,20(5):51-58. |
YUN F, LIU G S, SONG J. Effects of nitrogen supply on degradation products of plastid pigment and quality of flue-cured tobacco under different light intensity [J]. Acta Tab. Sin., 2014, 20(5):51-58. | |
7 | 刘典三,刘国顺,贾芳芳,等.不同光强对烤烟质体色素及其降解产物的影响[J].华北农学报,2013,28(1):234-238. |
LIU D S, LIU G S, JIA F F, et al.. Effects of light intensity on plastid pigment and its degraded products in flue-cured tobacco[J]. Acta Agric. Boreali-Sin., 2013, 28(1):234-238. | |
8 | 张国显,邸慧慧,王廷晓,等.土壤肥力对烤烟不同部位中性香气成分含量的影响[J].土壤,2011,43(1):101-106. |
ZHANG G X, DI H H, WANG T X, et al.. Effect of neutral aroma components in stalk positions under different fertility conditions for flue-cured tobacco [J]. Soils, 2011, 43(1):101-106. | |
9 | 宫长荣.烟草调制学[M].北京:中国农业出版社,2011:126-146. |
GONG C R. Tobacco Curing Science [M]. Beijing: China Agricultural Press, 2011:126-146. | |
10 | 王鹏泽,赵铭钦,刘鹏飞,等.浓香型产区烤烟中性致香成分与生物碱组成及含量[J].中国烟草科学,2014,35(5):98-102. |
WANG P Z, ZHAO M Q, LIU P F, et al.. Composition and content of neutral aroma components and alkaloids in flue-cured tobacco from full flavor tobacco growing regions [J]. Tob. Sci. China, 2014, 35(5):98-102. | |
11 | GOODENOUGH U W, LEVINE R P. Chloroplast ultrastructure in mutant strains of chlamydomonas reinhardi lacking components of the photosynthetic apparatus [J]. Plant Physiol., 1969, 44(7):990-1000. |
12 | 潘瑞炽,王小菁,李娘辉.植物生理学[M].北京:高等教育出版社,2004:57-59. |
PAN R Z, WANG X Q, LI N H. Plant Physiology [M]. Beijing: Higher Education Press, 2004:57-59. | |
13 | 郑小雨,李常军,路晓崇,等.烤烟不同成熟期色素含量变化及其与叶绿体超微结构的关系探究[J].中国农业科技导报,2020,22(10):60-68. |
ZHENG X Y, LI C J, LU X C, et al.. Study on changes of pigment content in flue-cured tobacco at different maturity stage and its relationship with chloroplast ultrastructure [J]. China Agric. Sci. Technol., 2020, 22(10):60-68. | |
14 | 夏春,李寒雪,孙觅,等.烤烟不同部位叶片超微结构与常规化学成分的关系[J]. 湖南农业大学学报(自然科学版),2020,46(2):150-156. |
XIA C, LI H X, SUN M, et al.. Ultrastructural differences of flue-cured tobacco from different stalk positions and their relationship with chemical components [J]. J. Hunan Agric. Univ. (Nat. Sci.), 2020, 46(2):150-156. | |
15 | 雷华,陈国祥,高志萍,等.两优培九剑叶叶绿体衰退进程中的细胞生物学特性初探[J].中国水稻科学,2008(3):279-284. |
LEI H, CHEN G X, GAO Z P, et al.. Cellular biological characteristics of chloroplast of flag leaves in super hybrid rice liangyoupeijiu during senescence [J]. J. Rice Sci. China, 2008(3):279-284. | |
16 | 王婵娟,刘国顺,张彩霞,等.烟叶生长发育过程中叶片光合特性及叶绿体超微结构的变化[J].江西农业大学学报,2010,32(2):254-259. |
WANG C J, LIU G S, ZHANG C X, et al.. Changes in photosynthetic characteristics and chloroplast ultrastructure during the development of tobacco leaf [J]. Jiangxi Acta Agric.Univ., 2010, 32(2):254-259. | |
17 | WILLIAM A C, JOHN G H. Changes in leaf pigments during senescence and curing of flue-cured tobacco [J]. Can. J. Plant Sci., 1984, 64(1):229-232. |
18 | 杨培芳,史红专,郭巧生,等.光照强度对紫花地丁物质和能量代谢的影响[J].中国中药杂志,2020,45(24):5944-5950. |
YANG P F, SHI H Z, GUO Q S, et al.. Effects of light intensity on material and energy metabolism of viola yedoensis [J]. Chin. J. Trad. Chin. Med., 2020, 45(24):5944-5950. | |
19 | 李卫星,杨舜博,何智冲,等.植物叶色变化机制研究进展[J].园艺学报,2017,44(9):1811-1824. |
LI W X, YANG S B, HE Z C, et al.. Research advances in the regulatory mechanisms of leaf coloration [J]. Acta Hortic. Sin., 2017, 44(9):1811-1824. | |
20 | 高慧君,明家琪,张雅娟,等.园艺植物中类胡萝卜素合成与调控的研究进展[J].园艺学报,2015,42(9):1633-1648. |
GAO H J, MING J Q, ZHANG Y J, et al.. Regulation of carotenoids biosynthesis in horticultural crops [J]. Acta Hortic. Sin., 2015, 42(9):1633-1648. | |
21 | 张柳,王铮,张亚婕,等.烟草叶片衰老期过程中的蛋白质组学分析[J]. 植物生理学报, 2014, 50(04):488-500. |
ZHANG L, WANG Z, ZHANG Y J, et al.. Proteomics analysis of senescence leaf of tobacco [J]. J. Plant Physiol., 2014, 50(4):488-500. | |
22 | 王峰,闫家榕,陈雪玉,等.光调控植物叶绿素生物合成的研究进展[J].园艺学报,2019,46(5):975-994. |
WANG F, YAN J R, CHEN X Y, et al.. Light regulation of chlorophyl biosynthesis in plants [J]. Acta Hortic. Sin., 2019, 46(5): 975-994. | |
23 | 夏明月,柴岩,冯佰利,等.绿豆开花后不同节位叶片衰老的超微结构研究[J].西北农业学报,2009,18(3):131-135. |
XIA M Y, CHAI Y, FENG B L, et al.. Ultrastructure changes of different leaf positions during different maturity grades in mung bean [J]. Acta Agric. Bor-Occid. Sin., 2009, 18(3):131-135. | |
24 | 过伟民,尹启生,宋纪真.烟草质体色素及其降解产物影响因素研究进展[J].华北农学报,2008,23():358-362. |
GUO W M, YIN Q S, SONG J Z. Research progress on influencing factors of plastid pigment and its degrading products from tobacco [J]. Acta Agric. Boreali-Sin., 2008, 23(S):358-362. | |
25 | 王瑞新.烟草化学[M].北京:中国农业出版社,2003:196-201. |
WANG R X. Tobacco Chemistry [M]. Beijing: China Agricultural Press, 2003:196-201. | |
26 | 刘洪华,赵铭钦,王付峰,等.有机无机肥配施对烤烟质体色素及降解产物的影响[J].中国烟草科学,2010,31(5):38-43. |
LIU H H, ZHAO M Q, WANG F F, et al.. Effects of combined application of organic and chemical fertilizers on plastid pigment and its degraded products in flue-cured tobacco [J]. Tob. Sci. China, 2010, 31(5):38-43. | |
27 | 徐安传,胡巍耀.烟叶不同区位叶黄素和β-胡萝卜素分布特征的研究[J].中国烟草科学,2013,34(2):59-63. |
XU A C, HU W Y. Distribution characteristics of lutein and β-carotene in different leaf positions of flue-cured tobacco [J]. Tob. Sci. China, 2013, 34(2):59-63. | |
28 | 杨永霞,张嘉炜,贾宏昉,等.成熟期温度对烟叶质体色素积累及香气成分的影响[J].烟草科技,2016,49(5):16-22. |
YANG Y X, ZHANG J W, JIA H F, et al.. Effect of temperature on plastid pigments accumulation and aroma components in tobacco leaves at mature stage [J]. Tob. Sci. Technol., 2016, 49(5):16-22. | |
29 | 何涛,吴学明,张改娜,等.几种高山植物叶绿体淀粉粒的变化特征[J].植物科学学报,2005(6):545-548. |
HE T, WU X M, ZHANG G N, et al.. Characteristics of starch grains in chloroplast of five alpine plants [J]. J. Plant Sci., 2005(6):545-548. |
[1] | 罗俊, 周宏, 钱发聪, 李军营. 遮阴对烤烟烟碱合成调控的影响[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2022, 24(2): 115-123. |
[2] | 柳渊博, 王静, 朱学杰, 蒋伟峰, 刘天, 张锦中, 李耀鑫, 符云鹏. 不同水肥管理模式对烤烟养分积累及烟叶品质的影响[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2021, 23(9): 193-201. |
[3] | 苏玥§, 刘娟娟§, 完斌, 张鹏举, 陈正根, 宿俊吉, 王彩香. 乳苣叶绿体基因组特征及其系统发育分析[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2021, 23(6): 33-42. |
[4] | 范宁波1,周俊学2,江凯2,王宏2,史龙飞2,高玉龙3*,陈颐3*. 不同成熟期烤烟主脉中膜脂过氧化及其与衰老相关基因的关系探究[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2021, 23(3): 66-72. |
[5] | 保志娟,金蓉,杨金清,张琦,朱永立,赵正雄*. Pb、Zn复合作用对烤烟抗氧化酶及碳氮代谢的影响[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2021, 23(2): 65-72. |
[6] | 杨成翠1,徐照丽2,史普酉1,贾孟1,白羽祥1,朱宣全1,程亚东1,杨焕文1,王戈*. 氮肥运筹对烤烟养分积累和产质量的影响[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2020, 22(6): 176-185. |
[7] | 刘勇1,李立新1,吴金富2,赵树德2,何宽信1*. 多雨烟区倚靠式散叶装烟烘烤工艺对烟叶质量的影响[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2020, 22(4): 162-170. |
[8] | 刘扣珠1,高真真1,夏素素1,李建华2,顿松阳2,李洪亮2,王京2,段卫东3,史宏志1*. 基于产值和感官指标的豫中“上六片”烟叶栽培措施优化[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2020, 22(2): 158-165. |
[9] | 杨明坤1,李建华2,刘扣珠1,顿松阳2,李洪亮2,王典2,史宏志1*. 豫中上六片烤烟不同采收期对烤后烟叶品质的影响[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2020, 22(12): 163-171. |
[10] | 季凯凯1,宋希强1,陈春国2,李革2,谢尚潜1*. 木兰科叶绿体基因组的密码子使用特征分析[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2020, 22(11): 52-62. |
[11] | 郑小雨1,李常军2,路晓崇1,王刚3,赵俊杰2,李云平2,彭玖华2,杨超1,2*. 烤烟不同成熟期色素含量变化及其与叶绿体超微结构的关系探究[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2020, 22(10): 60-68. |
[12] | 吕大树1,李子绅2,郭泽2,张亚恒1,夏阳3,杨雨波1,徐玮1,陈向东1,王英锋2,张力元1,代晓燕2*. 分次施用钾肥及配套措施对烤烟生长发育及其产质量的影响[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2020, 22(1): 116-123. |
[13] | 代快1,李江舟1*,蒲天燕1,计思贵1,张立猛1,张璐2,段淑辉3,孟军4,张翠萍1,樊苗苗5. 施用生物炭对3种烟用农药残留的影响[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2019, 21(8): 99-106. |
[14] | 刘超1,武云杰1,张安乾1,贺文俊1,张思琦1,陈芳1,何佳1,周方1,杨铁钊1,叶红朝2*. 外源GA3和IAA对烤烟内源激素调控效应和常规化学成分的影响[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2019, 21(8): 153-160. |
[15] | 王林,刘志宏,许自成*. 烤烟烟叶酸性致香物质与多酚含量、化学成分及口感特性的关系研究[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2019, 21(5): 159-169. |
阅读次数 | ||||||
全文 |
|
|||||
摘要 |
|
|||||