不同恢复年限下典型草原区路域生态系统固碳功能研究

doi:10.13304/j.nykjdb.2022.0322

中国农业科技导报 ›› 2023, Vol. 25 ›› Issue (9): 207-216.DOI: 10.13304/j.nykjdb.2022.0322

不同恢复年限下典型草原区路域生态系统固碳功能研究

茶娜¹(), 刘宝河², 张朕¹, 李龙¹^,³(), 王嫣娇³, 王立国⁴, 苏非非⁴

^1.内蒙古农业大学沙漠治理学院，呼和浩特 010018
^2.内蒙古交通设计研究院有限责任公司，呼和浩特 010010
^3.内蒙古农业大学，国家林业局荒漠生态系统保护与修复重点实验室，呼和浩特 010018
^4.内蒙古公路交通投资发展有限公司，呼和浩特 010050

收稿日期:2022-04-20 接受日期:2022-10-26 出版日期:2023-09-15 发布日期:2023-09-28
通讯作者: 李龙
作者简介:茶娜E-mail：1091651174@qq.com；
基金资助:
内蒙古自治区科技重大专项(zdzx2018041);内蒙古自治区高校青年科技英才项目(NJYT22046)

Study on Carbon Sink Function of Road Area of Typical Grassland Under Different Restoration Years in Inner Mongolia

Na CHA¹(), Baohe LIU², Zhen ZHANG¹, Long LI¹^,³(), Yanjiao WANG³, Liguo WANG⁴, Feifei SU⁴

^1.College of Desert Science，Inner Mongolia Agricultural University，Hohohot 010018，China
^2.Inner Mongolia Transportation Design and Research Institute Co. ，Ltd. ，Hohohot 010010，China
^3.Key Laboratory of Desert Ecosystem Conservation and Restoration，State Forestry Administration； Inner Mongolia Agricultural University，Hohohot 010018，China
^4.Inner Mongolia Highway Traffic Investment Development Co. ，Ltd. ，Hohohot 010050，China

Received:2022-04-20 Accepted:2022-10-26 Online:2023-09-15 Published:2023-09-28
Contact: Long LI

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

为探究草原地区公路建设过程中生态系统碳汇功能恢复特征，以锡林郭勒典型草原区路域生态系统为研究对象，以野外实测数据结合空间代替时间法，对比分析典型草原区不同植被恢复年限下（1、5、15 a）路域生态系统4种典型扰动方式（碾压、路堤、路堑、取土场）的固碳功能特征。结果表明，随着恢复年限的增加，不同扰动方式下植被群落特征指标均显著上升。植被有机碳含量、土壤有机碳含量与恢复年限均呈正相关关系，表现为恢复15 a>恢复5 a>恢复1 a。最大值出现在恢复15 a时，路堤植被碳含量达到了143.65 g·kg^-1，路堤土壤碳含量为14.33 g·kg^-1。不同恢复年限下，4种扰动方式样地生态系统有机碳含量由高到低均表现为路堤>路堑>取土场>碾压。路堤在3种恢复年限下生态系统有机碳含量均高于其他3种样地，并且在恢复15 a时超过了原生对照21.6%。研究结果对路域生态系统修复及碳汇功能评价具有重要意义。

关键词: 公路路域, 碳汇, 有机碳含量, 生态恢复

Abstract:

In order to explore the characteristics of carbon sink function restoration of ecosystems in the process of highway construction in grassland areas，taking the road ecosystem in Xilingol typical grassland area as the research object，the characteristics of carbon sink function among 4 typical disturbance modes （roller compaction，embankment，cutting and borrow site） of road ecosystem in typical grassland area under different vegetation restoration years （1，5 and 15 a） were compared based on field measurements and space instead of time method. The results showed that， with the increase of restoration years，the vegetation community characteristics indicators increased significantly under different disturbance methods. Vegetation organic carbon content，soil organic carbon content and restoration period showed positive correlation，and showed restoration 15 a > restoration 5 a > restoration 1 a. The maximum value occurred when the restoration period was 15 a and the embankment vegetation carbon content was 143.65 g·kg^-1 and the embankment soil carbon content was 14.33 g·kg^-1. Under different restoration years，the order of organic carbon content in the four disturbed plots from high to low was embankment > cutting > fetch ground > rolling. The organic carbon content of the road embankment was higher than the other three samples at all three restoration years， and exceeded the native control by 21.6% at restoration 15 a. The results were of great significance for road ecosystem restoration and carbon sequestration function evaluation.

Key words: highway area, carbon sink, organic carbon content, ecological restoration

中图分类号:

X734

茶娜, 刘宝河, 张朕, 李龙, 王嫣娇, 王立国, 苏非非. 不同恢复年限下典型草原区路域生态系统固碳功能研究[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2023, 25(9): 207-216.

Na CHA, Baohe LIU, Zhen ZHANG, Long LI, Yanjiao WANG, Liguo WANG, Feifei SU. Study on Carbon Sink Function of Road Area of Typical Grassland Under Different Restoration Years in Inner Mongolia[J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2023, 25(9): 207-216.

图/表 8

参考文献 34

1	王雷, 王海洋. 基于Meta分析的路域植物物种丰富度变化及其影响因素[J]. 生态学杂志, 2021, 40(9):2945-2953.
	WANG L, WANG H Y. Variation of plant species richness in road area and its influencing factors beasd on meta analysis [J]. Chin. J. Ecol., 2021, 40(9):2945-2953.
2	EWERS R M, KLISKEY A D, WALKER S,et al.. Past and future trajectories of forest loss in New Zealand [J]. Biol. Conserv., 2006, 133(3): 312-325.
3	侯程程. 全球气候变暖背景下公路碳排放及路域碳汇研究[D]. 青岛: 中国海洋大学, 2013.
	HOU C C. The research of highway carbon emissions and expressway carbon sink under the background of global clamit warming [D]. Qingdao: Ocean University of China, 2013.
4	杨季. 试论草原碳源与碳汇的对立统一关系及草原碳汇的作用[J]. 国家林业和草原局管理干部学院学报, 2019, 18(2):8-12.
	YANG J. On the unity of opposites between grassland carbon source and carbon sink and the role of grassland carbon sink [J]. J. Manage. Cadre College State For. Grassland Administration, 2019, 18(2): 8-12.
5	赵宁, 周蕾, 庄杰, 等. 中国陆地生态系统碳源/汇整合分析[J]. 生态学报, 2021, 41(19): 7648-7658.
	ZHAO N, ZHOU L, ZHUANG J, et al.. Integration analysis of the carbon source and sink in terrestrial ecosystem, China [J]. Acta Ecol. Sin., 2021, 41(19): 7648-7658.
6	王勇辉, 焦黎. 艾比湖湿地土壤有机碳及储量空间分布特征[J]. 生态学报, 2016, 36(18): 5893-5901.
	WANG Y H, JIAO L. The characteristics and storage of soil organic carbon in Ebinur Lake wetland [J]. Acta Ecol.Sin., 2016, 36 (18): 5893-5901.
7	王绍强, 周成虎, 李克让, 等. 中国土壤有机碳库及空间分布特征分析[J]. 地理学报, 2000, 55(5): 533-544.
	WANG S Q, ZHOU C H, LI K R, et al.. Analysis on spatial distribution characterisics of soil organic carbon reservoir in China [J]. Acta Geogr. Sin., 2000, 55(5): 533-544.
8	周莉, 李保国, 周广胜. 土壤有机碳的主导影响因子及其研究进展[J]. 地球科学进展, 2005, 20(1): 99-105.
	ZHOU L, LI B G, ZHOU G S. Advances in controlling factors of soil organic carbon [J]. Adv. Earth Sci., 2005, 20(1): 99-105.
9	林枫, 王丽芳, 文琦. 黄土高原土壤有机碳固存对植被恢复的动态响应及其碳汇价值[J]. 水土保持研究, 2021, 28(3): 53-58.
	LIN F, WANG L F, WEN Q. Dynamic responses of sequestration of soil organic carbon to vegetation restoration and the values of carbon sink in the Loess Platea [J]. Res. Soil Water Conserv., 2021, 28(3): 53-58.
10	黄先飞, 周运超, 张珍明. 喀斯特石漠化区不同土地利用方式下土壤有机碳分布特征[J]. 水土保持学报, 2017, 31(5): 215-221.
	HUANG X F, ZHOU Y C, ZHANG Z M. Distribution characteristics of soil organic carbon under different land use modes in Karst Rocky Desertification Area [J]. J. Soil Water Conserv., 2017, 31(5): 215-221.
11	季波, 谢应忠, 何建龙, 等. 宁夏典型温性天然草地固碳特征[J]. 应用生态学报, 2020, 31(11): 3657-3664.
	JI B, XIE Y Z, HE J L, et al.. Carbon sequestration characteristics of typical temperate natural grasslands in Ningxia, China [J]. Chin. J. Appl. Ecol., 2020, 31(11): 3657-3664.
12	许小明, 张晓萍, 何亮, 等. 黄土丘陵区不同恢复植被类型的固碳特征[J]. 环境科学, 2022, 43(11): 5263-5273.
	XU X M, ZHANG X P, HE L,et al.. Carbon sequestration characteristics of different restored vegetation typesin loess hilly reqion [J]. Chin. J. Environ. Sci., 2022, 43(11): 5263-5273.
13	李令, 贺慧丹, 未亚西, 等. 三江源农牧交错区植被群落及土壤固碳持水能力对退耕还草措施的响应[J]. 草业科学,2017, 34(10): 1999-2008.
	LI L, HE H D, WEI Y X, et al.. Response of vegetation community structure, soil carbon sequestration, and water-holding capacity in returning farmland to grassland plots, in the agro pastoral transitional zone in the Three Rivers Source Region [J]. Pratac. Sci., 2017, 34(10): 1999-2008.
14	国家林业局.森林土壤分析方法[J].北京:中国标准出版社,1999:1-48.
15	王志婷, 刘廷玺, 童新, 等. 不同处理方式对沙丘‒草甸草地植被和土壤特征的影响[J]. 中国草地学报, 2022, 44(7): 43-52.
	WANG Z T, LIU T X, TONG X, et al.. Effects of different treatments on vegetation and soil characteristics of dune-meadow grassland [J]. Chin. J. Grass., 2022, 44(7): 43-52.
16	安慧, 杨新国, 刘秉儒, 等. 荒漠草原区弃耕地植被演替过程中植物群落生物量及土壤养分变化[J]. 应用生态学报, 2011,22(12): 3145-3149.
	AN H, YANG X G, LIU B R,et al.. Changes of plant community biomass and soil nutrients during the vegetation succession on abandoned cultivated land in desert steppe region [J]. Chin. J. Appl. Ecol., 2011, 22(12): 3145-3149.
17	杨振意, 薛立, 许建新. 采石场废弃地的生态重建研究进展[J]. 生态学报, 2012, 32(16): 5264-5274.
	YANG Z Y, XUE L, XU J X. Advances in ecology restoration of abandoned quarries [J]. Acta Ecol. Sin., 2012, 32(16): 5264-5274.
18	DENG L, WANG K B, CHENG M L, et al.. Soil organic carbon storage capacity positively related to forest succession on the Loess Plateau, China [J/OL]. Catena, 2013, 110: 7428 [2022-04-10]. .
19	冯棋, 杨磊, 王晶, 等. 黄土丘陵区植被恢复的土壤碳水效应[J]. 生态学报, 2019, 39(18): 6598-6609.
	FENG Q, YANG L, WANG J, et al.. Response of soil moisture and soil organic carbon to vegetation restoration in deep soil profiles in Loess Hilly region [J]. Acta Ecol. Sin., 2019, 39(18): 6598-6609.
20	马维伟, 孙文颖. 尕海湿地植被退化过程中有机碳及相关土壤酶活性变化特征[J]. 自然资源学报, 2020, 35(5): 1250-1260.
	MA W W, SUN W Y. Changes of organic carbon and related soil enzyme activities during vegetation degradation in Gahai Wetland [J]. J. Nat. Resour., 2020, 35(5): 1250-1260.
21	陈春兰, 陈安磊, 魏文学, 等. 长期施肥对红壤稻田剖面土壤碳氮累积的影响[J]. 水土保持研究, 2021, 28(2): 14-20.
	CHEN C L, CHEN A L, WEI W X, et al.. Effect of long-term fertilization on accumulation of soil carbon and nitrogen in eeddish paddy soil profiles [J]. Res. Soil Water Conserv., 2021, 28(2): 14-20.
22	WANG Y Q, SHAO M A, ZHANG C C, et al.. Soil organic carbon in deep profiles under Chinese continental monsoon climate and its relations with land uses [J]. Ecol. Eng., 2015, 82: 361-367.
23	余海龙, 宋同清, 肖润林, 等. 高速公路路域边坡人工植被下土壤质量的变化[J]. 生态学杂志, 2021, 25(3): 281-285.
	YU H L, SONG T Q, XIAO R L, et al.. Changes of soil quality under artificial vegetation on highway slope [J]. Chin. J. Ecol., 2021, 25(3): 281-285.
24	孙小丽, 康萨如拉, 张庆, 等. 荒漠草原物种多样性、生产力与气候因子和土壤养分之间关系的研究[J]. 草业学报, 2015, 24(12): 10-19.
	SUN X L, KANG S R L, ZHANG Q, et al.. Relationship between species diversity,productivity,climatic factors and soil nutrients in the desert steppe [J] Acta Pratac. Sin., 2015, 24(12): 10-19.
25	LI Y Q, ZHAO X Y, ZHANG F X, et al.. Accumulation of soil organic carbon during natural restoration of desertified grassland in China’s Horqin sandy land [J]. J. Arid Land,2015, 7(3): 328-340.
26	赵啸龙, 谢玉鸿, 马旭君, 等. 科尔沁沙质草地不同恢复年限草本层群落结构及其与土壤理化性质的关系[J]. 中国沙漠, 2022, 42(2): 134-141.
	ZHAO X L, XIE Y H, MA X J, et al.. Vegetation structure and its relationship with soil physicochemical properties in restoring sandy grassland in Horqin sandy land [J]. J. Desert Res., 2022, 42(2): 134-141.
27	李金全, 李兆磊, 江国福, 等. 中国农田耕层土壤有机碳现状及控制因素[J]. 复旦学报(自然科学版), 2016, 55(2): 247-256, 266.
	LI J Q, LI Z L, JIANG G F, et al.. A study on soil organic carbon in plough layer of China's Arable land [J]. Fudan J. (Nat. Sci.), 2016, 55(2): 247-256, 266.
28	杨颖慧, 张锦华, 杨春华. 退化草地恢复生态对土壤物理性状的影响——以藏北公路沿线车辆碾压干扰矮嵩草草甸为例[J]. 水土保持学报, 2006, 20(5): 56-59, 72.
	YANG Y H, ZHANG J H, YANG C H. Effects of ecological restoration of degraded grassland on soil physical characteristics-as an example of trampling disturbance on Kobresia Humilis grassland alone Qingzang road in North Tibet [J]. J. Soil Water Conserv., 2006, 20(5): 56-59, 72.
29	张琳琳, 丁国栋, 肖萌, 等. 干草原区车辆碾压对土壤理化性质的影响[J]. 干旱区资源与环境, 2013, 27(12): 81-86.
	ZHANG L L, DING G D, XIAO M, et al.. The influence of vehicles rolling on physical and chemical properties of soil in steppes [J]. J. Arid Land Res. Environ., 2013, 27(12): 81-86.
30	翟佳. 鲁中南丘陵区高速公路边坡微立地类型划分与立地质量评价[D]. 北京: 北京林业大学, 2019.
	ZHAI J. Classification of micro-site types and site quality evaluation of expressway slopes in central and southern Shandong [D]. Beijing: Beijing Forestry University, 2019.
31	廖娇娇, 窦艳星, 安韶山. 黄土高原不同植被群落多样性与土壤有机碳密度关系研究[J]. 水土保持研究, 2022, 29(4):75-82.
	LIAO J J, DOU Y X, AN S S. Relationship between vegetation community diversity and soil organic carbon density on the Loess Plateau [J ]. Res. Soil Water Conserv., 2022, 29(4): 75-82.
32	赵冰清. 半干旱黄土区大型露天煤矿植被演替规律研究[D]. 北京: 中国地质大学,2019.
	ZHAO B Q. Vegetation succession of large open-pit coal mine in semi-arid loess area [D]. Beijing:China University of Geosciences, 2019.
33	张亦扬. 榆神府采煤塌陷区不同植被恢复方式下土壤与植物演替规律及其耦合关系[D]. 西安: 西安科技大学, 2019.
	ZHANG Y Y. Soil-vegetation evolution dynamics and coupling effects of different vegetation restoration modes in Yushenfu coalmining area [D]. Xi’an: Xi’an University of science and technology, 2019.
34	李文军, 刘少文, 贾春峰, 等. 黄土地区高速公路边坡土质特征试验研究[J]. 公路, 2015, 60(7): 259-264.
	LI W J, LIU S W, JIA C F, et al.. Experimental study on soil characteristics of expressway slope in Loess Area [J]. Highway,2015, 60(7): 259-264.

路段名称Section name	起始位置 Starting position	终止位置 End position	恢复年限Recovery period/a	扰动方式Disturbance mode	样方数量Number of sample plots	海拔Altitude/m	坡度 Slope/（°）	植被盖度Vegetation coverage/％
G303-A	锡林浩特 Xilinhot	阿巴嘎旗 Abaga Banner	1	碾压Rolling	4	1 023	4.23	5~10
				路堤Embankment	5	1 027	37.52	20~35
				取土场Borrow area	4	1 098	24.60	10~15
				路堑Cutting	5	1 103	38.90	15~25
G207-X	锡林浩特 Xilinhot	西乌珠穆沁旗 Xiwuzhumuqin Banner	5	碾压Rolling	5	1 046	12.53	5~12
				路堤Embankment	5	1 103	41.20	35~45
				取土场Borrow area	4	1 037	16.11	10~18
				路堑Cutting	4	1 125	30.36	20~30
G207-W	锡林浩特 Xilinhot	乌日图塔拉 Wuritutala	15	碾压Rolling	4	1 070	8.85	10~15
				路堤Embankment	5	1 065	32.12	50~60
				取土场Borrow area	4	1 044	24.60	30~40
				路堑Cutting	5	1 119	36.37	35~45
				CK	5	1 093	9.10	45~90

路段名称Section name	起始位置 Starting position	终止位置 End position	恢复年限Recovery period/a	扰动方式Disturbance mode	样方数量Number of sample plots	海拔Altitude/m	坡度 Slope/（°）	植被盖度Vegetation coverage/％
G303-A	锡林浩特 Xilinhot	阿巴嘎旗 Abaga Banner	1	碾压Rolling	4	1 023	4.23	5~10
				路堤Embankment	5	1 027	37.52	20~35
				取土场Borrow area	4	1 098	24.60	10~15
				路堑Cutting	5	1 103	38.90	15~25
G207-X	锡林浩特 Xilinhot	西乌珠穆沁旗 Xiwuzhumuqin Banner	5	碾压Rolling	5	1 046	12.53	5~12
				路堤Embankment	5	1 103	41.20	35~45
				取土场Borrow area	4	1 037	16.11	10~18
				路堑Cutting	4	1 125	30.36	20~30
G207-W	锡林浩特 Xilinhot	乌日图塔拉 Wuritutala	15	碾压Rolling	4	1 070	8.85	10~15
				路堤Embankment	5	1 065	32.12	50~60
				取土场Borrow area	4	1 044	24.60	30~40
				路堑Cutting	5	1 119	36.37	35~45
				CK	5	1 093	9.10	45~90

植物种类Plant species	重要值Important value
植物种类Plant species	1 a	5 a	15 a	CK
猪毛蒿Artemisia scoparia Waldst. et Kit.		0.371 3		0.201 5
栉叶蒿Neopallasia pectinata （Pall.） Poljak.			0.834 2	0.109 0
野大麻Cannabis sativa L.			0.176 0	0.078 5
羊草Leymus chinensis （Trin.ex Bunge） Tzvelev	0.607 3	0.434 3	0.769 9	0.400 7
小叶锦鸡儿Caragana microphylla Lam			0.072 5	0.026 0
细叶马莲Iris lactea Pall.				0.039 4
委陵菜Potentilla chinensis Ser.		0.033 1		0.021 2
菟丝子Cuscuta chinensis Lam.			0.018 9	0.106 4
酸模叶蓼Persicaria lapathifolia （L.） Delarbre			0.013 1
蒲公英Taraxacum mongolicum Hand.-Mazz.		0.052 7		0.020 3
苜蓿Medicago sativa L.			0.104 3	0.038 7
冷蒿Artemisia frigida Willd		0.332 2		0.074 5
胡枝子Lespedeza bicolor Turcz.	0.123 7
鹤虱Lappula myosotis Moench		0.034 4	0.038 8	0.016 9
褐沙蒿Artemisia halodendron
大籽蒿Artemisia sieversiana Ehrhart ex Willd.	0.898 6	0.296 4	0.638 0	0.044 4
苁蓉Cistanche deserticola Ma			0.052 2	0.020 8
刺儿菜Cirsium arvense var. integrifolium				0.022 2
车前Plantago asiatica L.		0.015 6		0.031 0
糙引子草Cleistogenes squarrosa （Trin.） Keng	1.078 2			0.100 2
冰草Agropyron cristatum （L.） Gaertn. （Gramineae）		0.418 0	0.295 2	0.055 6
物种数量Number of species	4	9	11	18

植物种类Plant species	重要值Important value
植物种类Plant species	1 a	5 a	15 a	CK
猪毛蒿Artemisia scoparia Waldst. et Kit.		0.371 3		0.201 5
栉叶蒿Neopallasia pectinata （Pall.） Poljak.			0.834 2	0.109 0
野大麻Cannabis sativa L.			0.176 0	0.078 5
羊草Leymus chinensis （Trin.ex Bunge） Tzvelev	0.607 3	0.434 3	0.769 9	0.400 7
小叶锦鸡儿Caragana microphylla Lam			0.072 5	0.026 0
细叶马莲Iris lactea Pall.				0.039 4
委陵菜Potentilla chinensis Ser.		0.033 1		0.021 2
菟丝子Cuscuta chinensis Lam.			0.018 9	0.106 4
酸模叶蓼Persicaria lapathifolia （L.） Delarbre			0.013 1
蒲公英Taraxacum mongolicum Hand.-Mazz.		0.052 7		0.020 3
苜蓿Medicago sativa L.			0.104 3	0.038 7
冷蒿Artemisia frigida Willd		0.332 2		0.074 5
胡枝子Lespedeza bicolor Turcz.	0.123 7
鹤虱Lappula myosotis Moench		0.034 4	0.038 8	0.016 9
褐沙蒿Artemisia halodendron
大籽蒿Artemisia sieversiana Ehrhart ex Willd.	0.898 6	0.296 4	0.638 0	0.044 4
苁蓉Cistanche deserticola Ma			0.052 2	0.020 8
刺儿菜Cirsium arvense var. integrifolium				0.022 2
车前Plantago asiatica L.		0.015 6		0.031 0
糙引子草Cleistogenes squarrosa （Trin.） Keng	1.078 2			0.100 2
冰草Agropyron cristatum （L.） Gaertn. （Gramineae）		0.418 0	0.295 2	0.055 6
物种数量Number of species	4	9	11	18

恢复年限 Recovery period/a	Simpsom优势度指数 D	Shannon-Wiener多样性指数 H	Margale丰富度指数 M	Pielon均匀度指数 E
1	0.209±0.021 c	0.340±0.011 c	0.347±0.032 c	0.491±0.015 c
5	0.339±0.030 c	0.654±0.025 b	0.592±0.017 b	0.573±0.009 b
15	0.413±0.033 b	0.900±0.019 a	0.700±0.021 a	0.670±0.028 a
CK	0.542±0.012 a	0.947±0.040 a	0.691±0.064 a	0.683±0.036 a

不同恢复年限下典型草原区路域生态系统固碳功能研究

Study on Carbon Sink Function of Road Area of Typical Grassland Under Different Restoration Years in Inner Mongolia

RichHTML

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 8

参考文献 34

相关文章 9

编辑推荐

Metrics

扰动方式 Perturbation method	土层深度 Depth of soil layer/cm	恢复年限 Recovery period/a			CK
扰动方式 Perturbation method	土层深度 Depth of soil layer/cm	1	5	15	CK
路堤Embankment	0—10	10.98±0.68 αb	13.61±0.97 αa	14.33±0.93 αa	13.57±0.88 αa
	10—20	9.30±0.23 αb	10.00±0.74 αab	10.90±0.89 αa	10.80±0.49 αa
	20—30	6.05±0.34 αc	7.33±0.69 αb	8.44±0.58 αa	8.97±0.57 αa
路堑Borrow area	0—10	6.09±0.32 βc	8.07±0.45 βb	10.76±0.77 βab	13.57±0.91 αa
	10—20	4.99±0.44 γc	6.54±0.22 βb	9.83±0.71 αa	10.80±0.79 αa
	20—30	4.87±0.19 βc	6.58±0.13 αab	7.62±0.68 βa	8.97±0.61 αa
碾压Rolling	0—10	4.50±0.51 γc	4.90±0.27 γc	6.81±0.47 γb	13.57±0.64 αa
	10—20	3.32±0.12 γc	3.90±0.19 γbc	4.50±0.21 βb	10.80±0.76 αa
	20—30	2.60±0.22 γc	3.01±0.22 βc	4.10±0.37 γb	8.97±0.67 αa
取土场Cutting	0—10	7.12±0.68 βb	11.57±0.43 αb	12.35±0.35 αab	13.57±0.98 αa
	10—20	6.19±0.49 βc	7.80±0.68 βb	8.28±0.69 αb	10.80±0.29 αa
	20—30	6.01±0.53 αc	7.03±0.66 αb	7.61±0.37 βb	8.97±0.46 αa

[1]	关洪军, 陈玉环, 赵爱武. 中国海洋渔业碳中和能力评估[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2023, 25(4): 215-224.
[2]	李雪, 刘子飞, 赵明军, 徐乐俊, 孙慧武. 我国水产养殖与捕捞业“双碳”目标及实现路径[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2022, 24(11): 13-26.
[3]	岳冬冬,王鲁民*,方海,王茜,肖黎,熊敏思,郑亮. 淡水捕捞渔业碳汇量评估探析 ——以浙江省的生产调查样本数据为例[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2017, 19(11): 117-124.
[4]	郭月峰1,祁伟1,2,姚云峰1*,张美丽1,温健1,韩兆敏1,刘龙1,尉迟文思1. 内蒙古农牧交错带油松人工林碳汇效应研究[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2016, 18(5): 141-147.
[5]	岳冬冬1,王鲁民1*,方海1,耿瑞2,赵鹏飞2,熊敏思1,. 基于碳平衡的中国海洋渔业产业发展对策探析[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2016, 18(4): 1-8.
[6]	岳冬冬1,王鲁民1*,张勋1,郑汉丰1,冯春雷1, 张衡1,王永进1,2,戴媛媛1. 印度洋金枪鱼渔业碳汇量评估初探——以中国为例[J]. , 2014, 16(5): 132-138.
[7]	贾敬敦1,魏珣1,金书秦2. 澳大利亚发展碳汇农业对中国的启示[J]. , 2012, 14(2): 7-11.
[8]	董立国,李生宝,潘占兵,蔡进军,张源润,蒋齐. 半干旱黄土丘陵区退化生态系统恢复模式与技术体系的探讨[J]. , 2008, 10(6): 35-41.
[9]	王宗礼孙启忠闫志坚. 抓住机遇加快西部草原生态恢复与治理[J]. , 2004, 6(1): 54-56.