中国农业科技导报 ›› 2024, Vol. 26 ›› Issue (9): 193-202.DOI: 10.13304/j.nykjdb.2022.1099
• 生物制造 资源生态 • 上一篇
石纹碹1(), 谭金芳2, 张倩1, 李岚涛1, 王宜伦1(
)
收稿日期:
2022-12-21
接受日期:
2023-03-21
出版日期:
2024-09-15
发布日期:
2024-09-13
通讯作者:
王宜伦
作者简介:
石纹碹 E-mail:shiwenxuanzg@163.com;
基金资助:
Wenxuan SHI1(), Jinfang TAN2, Qian ZHANG1, Lantao LI1, Yilun WANG1(
)
Received:
2022-12-21
Accepted:
2023-03-21
Online:
2024-09-15
Published:
2024-09-13
Contact:
Yilun WANG
摘要:
为研究一次性施用缓(控)释肥对黄淮夏玉米产量、氮肥利用率和经济效益的影响,于2021年在河南省6个试验点开展一次性施用控释尿素或缓释尿素配施普通尿素的田间试验。共设置9个处理:不施氮肥(CK),单施普通尿素(U1),农民习惯施肥(U2),控释尿素与普通尿素配施(CRU)包括3∶7(CRU1)、5∶5(CRU2)、7∶3(CRU3)3种比例,缓释尿素与普通尿素配施(LCU)包括3∶7(LCU1)、5∶5(LCU2)和7∶3(LCU3)3种比例。研究控释尿素或缓释尿素配施普通尿素对夏玉米产量、氮素利用和经济效益的影响。结果表明,施氮处理较不施氮增产11.6%~49.1%,平均产量表现为CRU>LCU>U(U1、U2),CRU和LCU平均产量较U分别提高23.3%和9.7%,其中CRU2产量最高,为9 444.0 kg·hm-2,较其他施氮处理提高8.0%~33.6%,LCU2产量次之。CRU和LCU干物质积累量、穗粒数、千粒重较U均显著提高。CRU2氮肥表观利用率最高,为36.9%,LCU2次之,为33.2%。与U相比,CRU和LCU 0—40 cm NO
中图分类号:
石纹碹, 谭金芳, 张倩, 李岚涛, 王宜伦. 一次性施肥对不同生态区夏玉米产量和氮肥效率的影响[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2024, 26(9): 193-202.
Wenxuan SHI, Jinfang TAN, Qian ZHANG, Lantao LI, Yilun WANG. Effect of One-off Fertilization on Yield and Nitrogen Fertilizer Efficiency of Summer Maize in Different Ecological Regions[J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2024, 26(9): 193-202.
地点 Site | pH | 有机质 Organic matter/(g·kg-1) | 全氮 Total N/(g·kg-1) | 有效磷 Available P/(mg·kg-1) | 速效钾 Available K/(mg·kg-1) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
鹤壁 Hebi | 8.0 | 19.2 | 1.2 | 21.9 | 137.7 |
原阳 Yuanyang | 8.3 | 18.5 | 0.9 | 27.1 | 105.6 |
许昌 Xuchang | 8.2 | 18.2 | 1.1 | 16.3 | 78.1 |
南阳 Nanyang | 5.8 | 18.3 | 1.0 | 41.7 | 87.3 |
温县 Wenxian | 8.4 | 22.8 | 1.3 | 41.0 | 130.4 |
商丘 Shangqiu | 7.9 | 18.9 | 0.9 | 19.8 | 98.4 |
表1 各试验点土壤基本理化性状
Table 1 Basic nutrient status of soils at each experimental site
地点 Site | pH | 有机质 Organic matter/(g·kg-1) | 全氮 Total N/(g·kg-1) | 有效磷 Available P/(mg·kg-1) | 速效钾 Available K/(mg·kg-1) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
鹤壁 Hebi | 8.0 | 19.2 | 1.2 | 21.9 | 137.7 |
原阳 Yuanyang | 8.3 | 18.5 | 0.9 | 27.1 | 105.6 |
许昌 Xuchang | 8.2 | 18.2 | 1.1 | 16.3 | 78.1 |
南阳 Nanyang | 5.8 | 18.3 | 1.0 | 41.7 | 87.3 |
温县 Wenxian | 8.4 | 22.8 | 1.3 | 41.0 | 130.4 |
商丘 Shangqiu | 7.9 | 18.9 | 0.9 | 19.8 | 98.4 |
处理 Treatment | 施肥种类 Fertilizer type | 肥料用量 Fertilizer amount/(kg·hm-2) | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
N | P2O5 | K2O | ||
CK | 不施氮 No nitrogen fertilizer | 0 | 75 | 90 |
U1 | 普通尿素 Normal urea | 210 | 75 | 90 |
U2 | 农民习惯施肥 Farmers’ fertilization practices | 240 | 75 | 90 |
CRU1 | 30%控释尿素+70%普通尿素 30% controlled release urea+70% normal urea | 210 | 75 | 90 |
CRU2 | 50%控释尿素+50%普通尿素 50% controlled release urea+50% normal urea | 210 | 75 | 90 |
CRU3 | 70%控释尿素+30%普通尿素 70% controlled release urea+30% normal urea | 210 | 75 | 90 |
LCU1 | 30%缓释尿素+70%普通尿素 30% slow release urea+70% normal urea | 210 | 75 | 90 |
LCU2 | 50%缓释尿素+50%普通尿素 50% slow release urea+50% normal urea | 210 | 75 | 90 |
LCU3 | 70%缓释尿素+30%普通尿素 70% slow release urea+30% normal urea | 210 | 75 | 90 |
表2 试验各处理具体信息
Table 2 Specific information on each treatment of the experiment
处理 Treatment | 施肥种类 Fertilizer type | 肥料用量 Fertilizer amount/(kg·hm-2) | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
N | P2O5 | K2O | ||
CK | 不施氮 No nitrogen fertilizer | 0 | 75 | 90 |
U1 | 普通尿素 Normal urea | 210 | 75 | 90 |
U2 | 农民习惯施肥 Farmers’ fertilization practices | 240 | 75 | 90 |
CRU1 | 30%控释尿素+70%普通尿素 30% controlled release urea+70% normal urea | 210 | 75 | 90 |
CRU2 | 50%控释尿素+50%普通尿素 50% controlled release urea+50% normal urea | 210 | 75 | 90 |
CRU3 | 70%控释尿素+30%普通尿素 70% controlled release urea+30% normal urea | 210 | 75 | 90 |
LCU1 | 30%缓释尿素+70%普通尿素 30% slow release urea+70% normal urea | 210 | 75 | 90 |
LCU2 | 50%缓释尿素+50%普通尿素 50% slow release urea+50% normal urea | 210 | 75 | 90 |
LCU3 | 70%缓释尿素+30%普通尿素 70% slow release urea+30% normal urea | 210 | 75 | 90 |
处理 Treatment | 产量 Yield/(kg·hm-2) | 穗粒数 Grain number per spike | 千粒重 1 000-grain weight/g | 干物质积累量 Dry matter accumulation/(kg·hm-2) | 增产率 Increase rate/% |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
CK | 6 333.2 e | 380.1 d | 255.0 e | 11 904.5 c | — |
U1 | 7 169.2 d | 414.2 c | 266.0 bcd | 13 878.6 b | 13.2 |
U2 | 7 069.3 d | 407.3 c | 262.2 cd | 13 884.6 b | 11.6 |
CRU1 | 8 143.7 bc | 431.5 bc | 264.8 bcd | 14 540.8 b | 28.6 |
CRU2 | 9 444.0 a | 475.8 a | 284.3 a | 16 901.5 a | 49.1 |
CRU3 | 8 751.0 b | 433.0 bc | 272.3 abc | 14 964.5 b | 38.2 |
LCU1 | 7 216.6 d | 414.7 c | 256.5 de | 137 61.9 b | 13.9 |
LCU2 | 8 513.1 b | 447.5 b | 275.8 ad | 16 243.8 a | 34.4 |
LCU3 | 7 873.1 cd | 419.8 c | 266.2 bcd | 14 672.5 b | 24.3 |
表3 不同处理下夏玉米产量及其产量构成因素
Table 3 Summer maize yield and yield components under different treatments
处理 Treatment | 产量 Yield/(kg·hm-2) | 穗粒数 Grain number per spike | 千粒重 1 000-grain weight/g | 干物质积累量 Dry matter accumulation/(kg·hm-2) | 增产率 Increase rate/% |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
CK | 6 333.2 e | 380.1 d | 255.0 e | 11 904.5 c | — |
U1 | 7 169.2 d | 414.2 c | 266.0 bcd | 13 878.6 b | 13.2 |
U2 | 7 069.3 d | 407.3 c | 262.2 cd | 13 884.6 b | 11.6 |
CRU1 | 8 143.7 bc | 431.5 bc | 264.8 bcd | 14 540.8 b | 28.6 |
CRU2 | 9 444.0 a | 475.8 a | 284.3 a | 16 901.5 a | 49.1 |
CRU3 | 8 751.0 b | 433.0 bc | 272.3 abc | 14 964.5 b | 38.2 |
LCU1 | 7 216.6 d | 414.7 c | 256.5 de | 137 61.9 b | 13.9 |
LCU2 | 8 513.1 b | 447.5 b | 275.8 ad | 16 243.8 a | 34.4 |
LCU3 | 7 873.1 cd | 419.8 c | 266.2 bcd | 14 672.5 b | 24.3 |
处理 Treatment | 氮素累积量 N accumulation/(kg·hm-2) | 氮肥表观利用率 N recovery efficiency/% | 氮肥农学效率 N agronomic efficiency/(kg·kg-1) | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
秸秆 Straw | 籽粒 Grain | 植株 Plant | |||
CK | 43.3 c | 57.9 f | 101.2 e | - | - |
U1 | 58.5 b | 73.3 de | 131.9 d | 14.6 c | 4.0 d |
U2 | 65.1 ab | 70.1 e | 135.2 d | 14.2 c | 3.1 d |
CRU1 | 73.5 ab | 80.5 cd | 154.0 bcd | 25.1 bc | 8.6 bc |
CRU2 | 77.7 a | 100.9 a | 178.6 a | 36.9 a | 14.8 a |
CRU3 | 73.5 ab | 91.5 b | 165.0 abc | 30.4 ab | 11.6 b |
LCU1 | 77.3 a | 70.0 e | 147.3 cd | 22.0 bc | 4.2 d |
LCU2 | 82.8 a | 88.1 bc | 171.0 ab | 33.2 ab | 10.4 b |
LCU3 | 81.7 a | 72.2 de | 154.0 bcd | 25.2 bc | 7.3 cd |
表4 不同处理下夏玉米氮素积累量和氮肥利用效率
Table 4 N accumulation and N utilization efficiency in summer maize under different treatments
处理 Treatment | 氮素累积量 N accumulation/(kg·hm-2) | 氮肥表观利用率 N recovery efficiency/% | 氮肥农学效率 N agronomic efficiency/(kg·kg-1) | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
秸秆 Straw | 籽粒 Grain | 植株 Plant | |||
CK | 43.3 c | 57.9 f | 101.2 e | - | - |
U1 | 58.5 b | 73.3 de | 131.9 d | 14.6 c | 4.0 d |
U2 | 65.1 ab | 70.1 e | 135.2 d | 14.2 c | 3.1 d |
CRU1 | 73.5 ab | 80.5 cd | 154.0 bcd | 25.1 bc | 8.6 bc |
CRU2 | 77.7 a | 100.9 a | 178.6 a | 36.9 a | 14.8 a |
CRU3 | 73.5 ab | 91.5 b | 165.0 abc | 30.4 ab | 11.6 b |
LCU1 | 77.3 a | 70.0 e | 147.3 cd | 22.0 bc | 4.2 d |
LCU2 | 82.8 a | 88.1 bc | 171.0 ab | 33.2 ab | 10.4 b |
LCU3 | 81.7 a | 72.2 de | 154.0 bcd | 25.2 bc | 7.3 cd |
处理 Treatment | 产值 Output value | 氮肥成本 N cost | 收益 Profit | 增收 Net income | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
相比于U1 Compared to U1 | 相比于U2 Compared to U2 | |||||
U1 | 9 678 | 693 | 8 985 | — | — | |
U2 | 9 544 | 792 | 8 752 | — | — | |
CRU1 | 10 994 | 832 | 10 162 | 1 177 | 1 410 | |
CRU2 | 12 749 | 767 | 11 982 | 2 997 | 3 231 | |
CRU3 | 11 814 | 796 | 11 018 | 2 032 | 2 266 | |
LCU1 | 9 742 | 687 | 9 055 | 70 | 304 | |
LCU2 | 11 493 | 683 | 10 809 | 1 824 | 2 058 | |
LCU3 | 10 404 | 678 | 9 726 | 740 | 974 |
表5 不同处理下的经济效益分析
Table 5 Analysis of economic benefits under different treatments (元·hm-2,yuan·hm-2)
处理 Treatment | 产值 Output value | 氮肥成本 N cost | 收益 Profit | 增收 Net income | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
相比于U1 Compared to U1 | 相比于U2 Compared to U2 | |||||
U1 | 9 678 | 693 | 8 985 | — | — | |
U2 | 9 544 | 792 | 8 752 | — | — | |
CRU1 | 10 994 | 832 | 10 162 | 1 177 | 1 410 | |
CRU2 | 12 749 | 767 | 11 982 | 2 997 | 3 231 | |
CRU3 | 11 814 | 796 | 11 018 | 2 032 | 2 266 | |
LCU1 | 9 742 | 687 | 9 055 | 70 | 304 | |
LCU2 | 11 493 | 683 | 10 809 | 1 824 | 2 058 | |
LCU3 | 10 404 | 678 | 9 726 | 740 | 974 |
指标 Index | 处理 Treatment | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
U1 | U2 | CRU1 | CRU2 | CRU3 | LCU1 | LCU2 | LCU3 | |
产量可持续性指数 SYI | 0.72 d | 0.68 d | 0.79 bc | 0.92 a | 0.82 b | 0.75 c | 0.75 c | 0.69 d |
变异系数 CV/% | 16.7 a | 17.7 a | 11.8 cd | 10.0 d | 12.3 c | 12.6 bc | 11.7 cd | 13.9 b |
表6 各处理夏玉米产量可持续性指数和变异系数
Table 6 Sustainable yield index and coefficient of variation of summer maize for each treatments
指标 Index | 处理 Treatment | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
U1 | U2 | CRU1 | CRU2 | CRU3 | LCU1 | LCU2 | LCU3 | |
产量可持续性指数 SYI | 0.72 d | 0.68 d | 0.79 bc | 0.92 a | 0.82 b | 0.75 c | 0.75 c | 0.69 d |
变异系数 CV/% | 16.7 a | 17.7 a | 11.8 cd | 10.0 d | 12.3 c | 12.6 bc | 11.7 cd | 13.9 b |
1 | 王宜伦,白由路,谭金芳,等.采用粒片状肥料实现夏玉米一次施肥的可行性研究[J].植物营养与肥料学报,2016,22(4):1126-1132. |
WANG Y L, BAI Y L, TAN J F, et al.. Availability study of once quantitative fertilization in summer maize using fertilizer tablets [J]. J. Plant Nutr. Fert., 2016, 22(4): 1126-1132. | |
2 | 魏珊珊.增密减氮对高产夏玉米产量形成的影响及生理机制研究[D].泰安:山东农业大学,2016. |
WEI S S. Effects of increasing planting density and decreasing nitrogen rate on yield formation of summer maize and its physiological mechanisms [D]. Tai’an: Shandong Agricultural University, 2016. | |
3 | 李红莉,张卫峰,张福锁,等.中国主要粮食作物化肥施用量与效率变化分析[J].植物营养与肥料学报,2010,16(5):1136-1143. |
LI H L, ZHANG W F, ZHANG F S, et al.. Chemical fertilizer use and efficiency change of main grain crops in China [J]. J. Plant Nutr. Fert., 2010, 16(5): 1136-1143. | |
4 | TNERTON F S, JOSEPH G L. Crop grain yield response to crop ration and nitrogen over 35 years [J]. Agron. J., 2008, 100: 643-650. |
5 | 展茗,赵明,刘永忠,等.湖北省玉米产需矛盾及提升玉米生产科技水平对策[J].湖北农业科学,2010,49(4):802-806. |
ZHAN M, ZHAO M, LIU Y Z, et al.. Enhance maize production technology, alleviate the contradiction between production and demands of maize in Hubei province [J]. Hubei Agric. Sci., 2010, 49(4): 802-806. | |
6 | 王宜伦,李潮海,谭金芳,等.超高产夏玉米植株氮素积累特征及一次性施肥效果研究[J].中国农业科学,2010,43(15):3151-3158. |
WANG Y L, LI C H, TAN J F, et al.. Studies on plant nitrogen accumulation characteristics and the effect of single application of base fertilizer on super-high-yield summer maize [J]. Sci. Agric. Sin., 2010, 43(15): 3151-3158. | |
7 | 杨俊刚,高强,曹兵,等.一次性施肥对春玉米产量和环境效应的影响[J].中国农学通报,2009,25(19):123-128. |
YANG J G, GAO Q, CAO B, et al.. Effect of single fertilization on spring maize yield and environment [J]. Chin. Agric. Sci. Bull., 2009, 25(19): 123-128. | |
8 | 安景文,汪仁,包红静,等.不同肥料配方一次性施肥对玉米产量和养分吸收的影响[J].土壤通报,2008,39(4):874-877. |
AN J W, WANG R, BAO H J, et al.. Effects of basal dressing total fertilizers once with different fertilizer formulas on product and nutrient uptake of maize [J]. Chin. J. Soil Sci., 2008, 39(4): 874-877. | |
9 | 卢艳丽,白由路,王磊,等. 华北小麦-玉米轮作区缓控释肥应用效果分析[J].植物营养与肥料学报,2011,17(1):209-215. |
LU Y L, BAI Y L, WANG L, et al.. Efficiency analysis of slow/controlled release fertilizer on wheat-maize in North China [J]. J. Plant Nutr. Fert., 2011, 17(1): 209-215. | |
10 | 邵国庆,李增嘉,宁堂原,等.灌溉和尿素类型对玉米氮素利用及产量和品质的影响[J].中国农业科学,2008,41(11):3672-3678. |
SHAO G Q, LI Z J, NING T Y, et al.. Effects of irrigation and urea types on N utilization, yield and quality of maize [J]. Sci. Agric. Sin., 2008, 41(11): 3672-3678. | |
11 | 易镇邪,王璞. 包膜复合肥对夏玉米产量、氮肥利用率与土壤速效氮的影响[J].植物营养与肥料学报,2007,13(2):242-247. |
YI Z X, WANG P. Effect of coated compound fertilizer on yield, nitrogen use efficiency and soil available nitrogen in summer maize [J]. J. Plant Nutr. Fert., 2007, 13(2): 242-247. | |
12 | 王国文,郭景丽,姜瑛,等. 施用控失尿素对土壤养分含量及水稻产量的影响[J].河南农业科学,2015,44(10):73-75. |
WANG G W, GUO J L, JIANG Y, et al.. Effects of loss-control urea application on soil nutrient content and rice yield [J]. Henan Agric. Sci., 2015, 44(10): 73-75. | |
13 | 孙克刚,郭跃升,李玉顺,等.控失尿素在夏玉米上的应用效果研究[J].磷肥与复肥,2015,30(1):51-52. |
SUN K G, GUO Y S, LI Y S, et al.. Application effect of controlled release urea on summer maize [J]. Phosphate Compound Fert., 2015, 30(1): 51-52. | |
14 | 王永军,王空军,董树亭,等.氮肥用量、时期对墨西哥玉米产量及饲用营养品质的影响[J].中国农业科学,2005,38(3):492-497. |
WANG Y J, WANG K J, DONG S T, et al.. Effects of different nitrogen application strategies on yield and forage nutritive quality of Zea mexicana [J]. Sci. Agric. Sin., 2005, 38(3): 492-497. | |
15 | 王启现,王璞,申丽霞,等. 施氮时期对玉米土壤硝态氮含量变化及氮盈亏的影响[J].生态学报,2004,24(8):1582-1588. |
WANG Q X, WANG P, SHEN L X, et al.. Effect of nitrogen application time on dynamics of nitrate content and apparent nitrogen budget in the soil of summer maize fields [J]. Acta Ecol. Sin., 2004, 24(8): 1582-1588. | |
16 | MANNA M C, SWARUP A, WANJARI R H, et al.. Long-term effect of fertilizer and manure application on soil organic carbon storage, soil quality and yield sustainability under sub-humid and semi-arid tropical India [J]. Field Crops Res., 2005, 93: 264-280. |
17 | MAJUMDER B, MANDAL B, BANDYOPADHYAY P K, et al.. Soil organic carbon pools and productivity relationships for a 34 year old rice-wheat-jute agroecosystem under different fertilizer treatments [J]. Plant Soil, 2007, 297(1/2): 53-67. |
18 | 江丽华,谭德水,李子双,等.黄淮海平原夏玉米一次性施肥肥料产品的筛选与产量效应[J].中国农业科学,2018,51(20):3876-3886. |
JIANG L H, TAN D S, LI Z S, et al.. Fertilizer product screening and yield response about one-off fertilization on summer maize in Huang-Huai-Hai Plain [J]. Sci. Agric. Sin., 2018, 51(20): 3876-3886. | |
19 | 鲍士旦.土壤农化分析[M].第3版.北京:中国农业出版社,2000: 30-33. |
20 | GUO J J, FAN J L, ZHANG F C, et al.. Blending urea and slow-release nitrogen fertilizer increases dryland maize yield and nitrogen use efficiency while mitigating ammonia volatilization [J/OL]. Sci. Total Environ., 2021, 790: 148058 [2022-11-20]. . |
21 | 李忠芳,徐明岗,张会民,等.长期不同施肥模式对我国玉米产量可持续性的影响[J].玉米科学,2009,17(6):82-87. |
LI Z F, XU M G, ZHANG H M, et al.. Effects of different long-term fertilizations on sustainability of maize yield in China [J]. J. Maize Sci., 2009, 17(6): 82-87. | |
22 | 杨岩,谭德水,江丽华,等.黄淮海夏玉米一次性施肥技术效应研究[J].中国农业科学,2018,51(20):3909-3919. |
YANG Y, TAN D S, JIANG L H, et al.. The effects of one-off fertilization of summer maize in Huang-Huai-Hai region [J]. Sci. Agric. Sin., 2018, 51(20): 3909-3919. | |
23 | 周丽平,杨俐苹,白由路,等.不同氮肥缓释化处理对夏玉米田间氨挥发和氮素利用的影响[J].植物营养与肥料学报,2016,22(6):1449-1457. |
ZHOU L P, YANG L P, BAI Y L, et al.. Comparison of several slow-released nitrogen fertilizers in ammonia volatilization and nitrogen utilization in summer maize field [J]. J. Plant Nutr. Fert., 2016, 22(6):1449-1457. | |
24 | 李玮,李絮花,李海燕,等.控释尿素与普通尿素混施对夏玉米产量和氮肥效率的影响[J].作物学报,2012,38(4):699-706. |
LI W, LI X H, LI H Y, et al.. Effects of different mixing rates of controlled-release urea and common urea on grain yield and nitrogen use efficiency of summer maize [J]. Acta Agron. Sin., 2012, 38(4): 699-706. | |
25 | 郭萍,朱从桦,査丽,等.缓释尿素与普通尿素不同配比对玉米氮代谢酶和氮素利用的影响[J].中国土壤与肥料,2016(6):99-105. |
GUO P, ZHU C Y, ZHA L, et al.. Effects of the combined application of slow-release urea and urea on activities of key enzymes related to nitrogen metabolism and nitrogen utilization of maize [J]. Soil Fert. Sci. China, 2016 (6): 99-105. | |
26 | 蒋丽萍,李国芳,苗中芹,等. 控释尿素与普通尿素不同掺混比例对夏玉米产量和氮素利用效率的影响[J].山东农业科学,2021,53(2):64-70. |
JIANG L P, LI G F, MIAO Z Q, et al.. Effects of different blending ratios of controlled-release urea and common urea on grain yield and nitrogen use efficiency of summer maize [J]. Shandong Agric. Sci., 2021, 53(2): 64-70. | |
27 | 王宜伦,李潮海,谭金芳,等. 氮肥后移对超高产夏玉米产量及氮素吸收和利用的影响[J].作物学报,2011,37(2):339-347. |
WANG Y L, LI C H, TAN J F, et al.. Effect of postponing N application on yield, nitrogen absorption and utilization in super-high-yield summer maize [J]. Acta Agron. Sin., 2011, 37(2): 339-347. | |
28 | 王寅,冯国忠,张天山,等. 基于产量、氮效率和经济效益的春玉米控释氮肥掺混比例[J].土壤学报,2015,52(5):1153-1165. |
WANG Y, FENG G Z, ZHANG T S, et al.. Optimizing blending ratio of controlled release N fertilizer for spring maize based on grain yield,N efficiency, and economic benefit [J]. Acta Pedol. Sin., 2015, 52(5): 1153-1165. | |
29 | 衣文平,朱国梁,武良,等. 不同量的包膜控释尿素与普通尿素配施在夏玉米上的应用研究[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报,2010,16(6):1497-1502. |
YI W P, ZHU G L, WU L, et al.. Application of different release duration controlled-release coated urea combined with conventional urea on summer maize [J]. J. Plant Nutr. Fert., 2010, 16(6): 1497-1502. | |
30 | 王寅,冯国忠,张天山,等.控释氮肥与尿素混施对连作春玉米产量、氮素吸收和氮素平衡的影响[J].中国农业学报,2016,49(3):518-528. |
WANG Y, FENG G Z, ZHANG T S, et al.. Effects of mixed application of controlled-release N fertilizer and common urea on grain yield, N uptake and soil N balance in continuous spring maize production [J]. Sci. Agric. Sin., 2016, 49(3): 518-528. | |
31 | 洪瑜,李旭,张慈娟,等.控失尿素对宁夏引黄灌区水稻产量和氮素淋失的影响[J].福建农业学报,2020,35(3):323-330. |
HONG Y, LI X, ZHANG C J, et al.. Utilization of loss control urea in yellow river irrigation region to mitigate rice yield reduction and nitrogen leaching [J]. Fujian J. Agric. Sci., 2020, 35(3): 323-330. | |
32 | 张倩,韩本高,张博,等.控失尿素减施及不同配比对夏玉米产量及氮肥效率的影响[J].作物学报,2022,48(1):180-192. |
ZHANG Q, HAN B G, ZHANG B, et al.. Reduced application and different combined applications of loss-control urea on summer maize yield and fertilizer efficiency improvement [J]. Acta Agron. Sin., 2022, 48(1): 180-192. | |
33 | 李志国,张润花,陈防,等.控失尿素对水旱轮作下水稻产量和氮素利用效率的影响[J].中国土壤与肥料,2018(1):23-27. |
LI Z G, ZHANG R H, CHEN F, et al.. Effect of controlled release urea combined application with common urea on yield and nitrogen utilization efficiency of rice in paddy-upland rotation [J]. Soil Fert. Sci. Chin., 2018 (1): 23-27. | |
34 | 刘飞,张民,诸葛玉平,等.马铃薯玉米套作下控释肥对土壤养分垂直分布及养分利用率的影响[J].植物营养与肥料学报,2011,17(6):1351-1358. |
LIU F, ZHANG M, ZHUGE Y P, et al.. Effects of controlled-release fertilizer on vertical distribution of soil nutrients and nutrient use efficiencies under potato and maize relay cropping system [J]. J. Plant Nutr. Fert., 2011, 17(6): 1351-1358. | |
35 | 肖强,张夫道,王玉军,等.纳米材料胶结包膜型缓/控释肥料的特性及对作物氮素利用率与氮素损失的影响[J].植物营养与肥料学报,2008,14(4):779-785. |
XIAO Q, ZHANG F D, WANG Y J, et al.. Effects of slow/controlled release fertilizers felted and coated by nano-materials on nitrogen recovery and loss of crops [J]. J. Plant Nutr. Fert., 2008, 14(4): 779-785. | |
36 | 刘宏斌,李志宏,张云贵,等. 北京平原农区地下水硝态氮污染状况及其影响因素研究[J].土壤学报,2006,43(3):405-413. |
LIU H B, LI Z H, ZHANG Y G, et al.. Nitrate contamination of groundwater and its affecting factors in rural areas of Beijing plain [J]. Acta Pedol. Sin., 2006, 43(3): 405-413. | |
37 | 郭金金,张富仓,闫世程,等.缓释氮肥与尿素掺混对玉米生理特性和氮素吸收的影响[J].植物营养与肥料学报,2018,24(5):1194-1204. |
GUO J J, ZHANG F C, YAN S C, et al.. Effects of blending of slow-release nitrogen fertilizer and urea on maize physiological characteristics and nitrogen uptake [J]. J. Plant Nutr. Fert., 2018, 24(5): 1194-1204. | |
38 | 董亮,孙逊,张玉凤,等.不同比例控释/速效氮肥掺混在褐土区玉米上的应用效果研究[J].山东农业科学,2020,52(11):75-79. |
DONG L, SUN X, ZHANG Y F, et al.. Effects of controlled-release and available nitrogen fertilizers at different blending ratios on maize in cinnamon soil area [J]. Shandong Agric. Sci., 2020, 52(11): 75-79. | |
39 | ZHENG W K, ZHANG M, LIU Z G, et al.. Combining controlled-release urea and normal urea to improve the nitrogen use efficiency and yield under wheat-maize double cropping system [J]. Field Crops Res., 2016, 197: 52-62. |
40 | LI C L, WANG Y, LI Y X, et al.. Mixture of controlled-release and normal urea to improve nitrogen management for maize across contrasting soil types [J]. Agron. J., 2020, 112: 3101-3113. |
41 | 马力,杨林章,沈明星,等. 基于长期定位试验的典型稻麦轮作区作物产量稳定性研究[J].农业工程学报,2011,27(4):117-124. |
MA L, YANG L Z, SHEN M X, et al.. Study on corp yield stability in a typical region of rice-wheat rotation based on long-term fertilization experiment [J]. Trans. Chin. Soc. Agric. Eng., 2011, 27(4): 117-124. | |
42 | 陈家法,陈隆升,涂佳,等.长期施肥对油茶林产果量及土壤地力可持续性的影响[J].中南林业科技大学学报,2017,37(7):59-65. |
CHEN J F, CHEN L S, TU J, et al.. Effect of long-term fertilization on yield andsoil fertility sustainability of Camellia olerfera [J]. J. Central South Univ. For. Technol., 2017, 37(7): 59-65. | |
43 | 门明新,李新旺,许皞.长期施肥对华北平原潮土作物产量及稳定性的影响[J].中国农业科学,2008,41(8):2339-2346. |
MEN M X, LI X W, XU H. Effects of long-term fertilization on crop yields and stability [J]. Sci. Agric. Sin., 2008, 41(8): 2339-2346. | |
44 | 高洪军,彭畅,张秀芝,等.长期不同施肥对东北黑土区玉米产量稳定性的影响[J].中国农业科学,2015,48(23):4790-4799. |
GAO H J, PENG C, ZHANG X Z, et al.. Effect of long-term different fertilization on maize yield stability in the northeast black soil region [J]. Sci. Agric. Sin., 2015, 48(23): 4790-4799. | |
45 | 黄兴成,石孝均,李渝,等.基础地力对黄壤区粮油高产、稳产和可持续生产的影响[J].中国农业科学,2017,50(8):1476-1485. |
HUANG X C, SHI X J, LI Y, et al.. Effect of the inherent soil productivity on high, stable and sustainable yield of grain and oil crops in yellow soil region [J]. Sci. Agric. Sin., 2017, 50(8): 1476-1485. |
[1] | 吴梅, 张金珠, 王振华, 刘健, 温越, 李宣志. 水气互作对膜下滴灌玉米生理生长及产量的影响[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2024, 26(8): 189-200. |
[2] | 庞博, 李生梅, 李彦霖, 杨涛, 梁维维, 张茹, 黄雅婕, 任丹, 崔进鑫, 李静, 马晶晶, 高文伟. 192份陆地棉杂交种的遗传多样性分析[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2024, 26(8): 34-50. |
[3] | 孙亮, 徐益, 蔡沁, 郭靖豪, 赵灿, 郭保卫, 邢志鹏, 霍中洋, 张洪程, 胡雅杰. 中微量元素对水稻产量和品质的影响研究进展[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2024, 26(8): 9-19. |
[4] | 孙宪印, 牟秋焕, 米勇, 吕广德, 亓晓蕾, 孙盈盈, 尹逊栋, 王瑞霞, 吴科, 钱兆国, 赵岩, 高明刚. 基于GT双标图对小麦新品系的分类评价[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2024, 26(7): 14-24. |
[5] | 秦宇坤, 陈俊英, 张丽娟. 赣北棉区棉花干物质积累特征和产量对减氮措施的响应[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2024, 26(6): 191-199. |
[6] | 彭守华, 许铭铭, 尉继强, 梁丽君, 叶全, 迟晓元, 张少峰, 董向丽. 生物菌肥FBR1不同施用方式对花生生长发育及产量的影响[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2024, 26(6): 200-205. |
[7] | 陈雨欣, 赵红梅, 杨卫君, 杨梅, 郭颂, 宋世龙, 惠超. 生物质炭对土壤微生物碳源利用及春小麦产量的影响[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2024, 26(5): 174-183. |
[8] | 高丽敏, 顾泽辰, 贡雪菲, 崔联明, 郭东森, 周影, 王琳, 魏启舜. 果园生草对中国果树-土壤系统生产性能影响的Meta分析[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2024, 26(4): 184-194. |
[9] | 韩秀丽, 李嘉伟, 张杰, 郭艳杰, 张丽娟, 吉艳芝. 生物有机肥替代化肥对葡萄生长与土壤肥力的影响[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2024, 26(4): 195-205. |
[10] | 阿什日轨, 张荣萍, 周宁宁, 冯婷煜, 周林, 马鹏, 阿尔力色, 廖雪环, 张坷塬. 硅钙钾镁肥和密度对水稻产量形成的影响[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2024, 26(3): 155-163. |
[11] | 赵刚, 王淑英, 李尚中, 张建军, 党翼, 王磊, 李兴茂, 程万莉, 周刚, 倪胜利, 樊廷录. 黄土旱塬区近40年降水对冬小麦耗水和产量的影响[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2024, 26(3): 164-173. |
[12] | 李忠义, 唐红琴, 董文斌, 韦彩会, 何铁光. 稻秸-紫云英联合还田对水稻光合特性及产量品质的影响[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2024, 26(2): 171-180. |
[13] | 王辉, 付虹雨, 岳云开, 崔国贤, 佘玮. 基于气候变量的苎麻产量SSA-BP预测模型[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2024, 26(1): 110-118. |
[14] | 房彦飞, 罗晓颖, 唐江华, 孙婷婷, 王鲁振, 唐甜, 徐文修. 播种方式对旱地春小麦产量、干物质及水分利用效率的影响[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2024, 26(1): 173-181. |
[15] | 段媛媛, 刘晓洪, 唐涛, 王帆帆, 游景茂, 郭晓亮, 郭杰. 种植密度对湖北贝母生长及品质的影响[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2023, 25(9): 197-206. |
阅读次数 | ||||||
全文 |
|
|||||
摘要 |
|
|||||