中国农业科技导报 ›› 2025, Vol. 27 ›› Issue (5): 182-192.DOI: 10.13304/j.nykjdb.2023.0863
苗春霖1(), 许欢欢1, 贾紫毅1, 何爱民2,3, 吉洋洋2,3, 牟德华3, 高山1(
)
收稿日期:
2023-11-24
接受日期:
2024-03-04
出版日期:
2025-05-15
发布日期:
2025-05-20
通讯作者:
高山
作者简介:
苗春霖E-mail:1120012984@qq.com;
Chunlin MIAO1(), Huanhuan XU1, Ziyi JIA1, Aimin HE2,3, Yangyang JI2,3, Dehua MOU3, Shan GAO1(
)
Received:
2023-11-24
Accepted:
2024-03-04
Online:
2025-05-15
Published:
2025-05-20
Contact:
Shan GAO
摘要:
为研究核桃分心木(diaphragma juglandis fructus, DJF)水提物最佳提取工艺及抗氧化性,选取液料比、超声时间及超声温度为影响因素,以1,1-二苯基-2-三硝基苯肼(1,1-diphenyl-2-trinitrophenylhydrazine, DPPH)自由基清除率为响应值,进行单因素试验,采用响应面法优化超声辅助提取DJF水提物的工艺条件,并对分心木水提物进行组分分析及抗氧化性研究。结果表明,通过Box-Benhnken模型确定DJF水提物的最佳工艺为液料比92 mL∶1 g、超声温度58 ℃、超声时间19 min,所得DPPH自由基清除率为68.95%;通过高效液相色谱法(high performance liquid chromatography,HPLC)对DJF水提物进行组分分析发现,DJF水提物中多酚含量为0.28 mg·mL-1,多糖含量为0.33 mg·mL-1,主要活性成分含量为槲皮素245 μg·mg-1、没食子酸18 μg·mg-1、半乳糖98 μg·mg-1;DJF水提物抗氧化能力试验表明,DJF水提物2,2'-联氮-双-3-乙基苯并噻唑啉-6-磺酸(2,2'-azino-bis-3-ethylbenzothiazoline-6-sulfonic acid,ABTS)自由基清除率及DPPH自由基清除率总体低于维生素C(vitamin C, Vc),总还原力大于Vc,表明其具有较好的抗氧化能力,是一种潜在的抗氧化食品优质原料。以上研究结果为DJF活性成分提取提供了数据支撑,为进一步探究DJF功能成分提供了理论依据。
中图分类号:
苗春霖, 许欢欢, 贾紫毅, 何爱民, 吉洋洋, 牟德华, 高山. 分心木水提物的抗氧化性分析及组分鉴定[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2025, 27(5): 182-192.
Chunlin MIAO, Huanhuan XU, Ziyi JIA, Aimin HE, Yangyang JI, Dehua MOU, Shan GAO. Oxidation Resistance Analysis and Component Identification of Distracted Wood Water Extracts[J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2025, 27(5): 182-192.
水平Level | A:超声时间 Ultrasound time/min | B:超声温度 Ultrasonic temperature/℃ | C:液料比 Liquid-to-material ratio/(mL·g-1) |
---|---|---|---|
-1 | 10 | 50 | 80∶1 |
0 | 20 | 60 | 90∶1 |
1 | 30 | 70 | 100∶1 |
表1 DJF水提物响应面实验因素与水平表
Table 1 Experimental factors and level table of DJF-water extract response surface
水平Level | A:超声时间 Ultrasound time/min | B:超声温度 Ultrasonic temperature/℃ | C:液料比 Liquid-to-material ratio/(mL·g-1) |
---|---|---|---|
-1 | 10 | 50 | 80∶1 |
0 | 20 | 60 | 90∶1 |
1 | 30 | 70 | 100∶1 |
化合物 | 时间 Time/min | 乙腈 Acetonitrile/% |
---|---|---|
多酚 Polyphenol | 0~2 | 5~15 |
2~5 | 15~20 | |
5~20 | 20 | |
20~24 | 20~50 | |
24~26 | 50~100 | |
26~28 | 100~50 | |
28~30 | 50~20 | |
30~40 | 20~5 | |
多糖 Polysaccharide | 0~28 | 17 |
28~40 | 17~30 | |
40~45 | 30 | |
45 | 30~17 | |
45~50 | 17 |
表2 流动相梯度
Table 2 Mobile phase gradients
化合物 | 时间 Time/min | 乙腈 Acetonitrile/% |
---|---|---|
多酚 Polyphenol | 0~2 | 5~15 |
2~5 | 15~20 | |
5~20 | 20 | |
20~24 | 20~50 | |
24~26 | 50~100 | |
26~28 | 100~50 | |
28~30 | 50~20 | |
30~40 | 20~5 | |
多糖 Polysaccharide | 0~28 | 17 |
28~40 | 17~30 | |
40~45 | 30 | |
45 | 30~17 | |
45~50 | 17 |
编号 Number | 因素Factor | DPPH清除率 DPPH clearance/% | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
A:超声时间 Ultrasonic time/min | B:超声温度 Ultrasonic temperature/℃ | C:液料比 Liquid-to-material ratio/(mL·g-1) | ||
1 | 10 | 50 | 90∶1 | 60.45 |
2 | 20 | 50 | 90∶1 | 62.83 |
3 | 10 | 70 | 90∶1 | 62.30 |
4 | 30 | 70 | 90∶1 | 52.13 |
5 | 10 | 60 | 80∶1 | 62.26 |
6 | 30 | 60 | 80∶1 | 59.90 |
7 | 10 | 60 | 80∶1 | 65.73 |
8 | 30 | 60 | 100∶1 | 63.85 |
9 | 20 | 50 | 80∶1 | 60.20 |
10 | 20 | 70 | 80∶1 | 53.82 |
11 | 20 | 50 | 100∶1 | 65.60 |
12 | 20 | 70 | 100∶1 | 55.19 |
13 | 20 | 60 | 90∶1 | 71.48 |
14 | 20 | 60 | 90∶1 | 71.81 |
15 | 20 | 60 | 90∶1 | 73.30 |
16 | 20 | 60 | 90∶1 | 71.83 |
17 | 20 | 60 | 90∶1 | 71.05 |
表3 DJF水提物响应面试验设计及结果
Table 3 Experimental design and results of DJF water extract response surface
编号 Number | 因素Factor | DPPH清除率 DPPH clearance/% | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
A:超声时间 Ultrasonic time/min | B:超声温度 Ultrasonic temperature/℃ | C:液料比 Liquid-to-material ratio/(mL·g-1) | ||
1 | 10 | 50 | 90∶1 | 60.45 |
2 | 20 | 50 | 90∶1 | 62.83 |
3 | 10 | 70 | 90∶1 | 62.30 |
4 | 30 | 70 | 90∶1 | 52.13 |
5 | 10 | 60 | 80∶1 | 62.26 |
6 | 30 | 60 | 80∶1 | 59.90 |
7 | 10 | 60 | 80∶1 | 65.73 |
8 | 30 | 60 | 100∶1 | 63.85 |
9 | 20 | 50 | 80∶1 | 60.20 |
10 | 20 | 70 | 80∶1 | 53.82 |
11 | 20 | 50 | 100∶1 | 65.60 |
12 | 20 | 70 | 100∶1 | 55.19 |
13 | 20 | 60 | 90∶1 | 71.48 |
14 | 20 | 60 | 90∶1 | 71.81 |
15 | 20 | 60 | 90∶1 | 73.30 |
16 | 20 | 60 | 90∶1 | 71.83 |
17 | 20 | 60 | 90∶1 | 71.05 |
方差来源 Source of variance | 平方和 Sum of squares | 自由度 Degree of freedom | 均方 Mean square | F值 F value | P值 P value |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
模型 Model | 679.00 | 9 | 75.56 | 42.76 | <0.000 1 |
A:超声时间 Ultrasound time | 18.07 | 1 | 18.07 | 10.23 | 0.015 1* |
B:超声温度 Ultrasonic temperature | 82.27 | 1 | 82.27 | 46.56 | 0.000 2* |
C:液料比 Liquid-to-materialratio | 25.16 | 1 | 25.16 | 14.24 | 0.007 0** |
AB | 39.33 | 1 | 39.33 | 22.26 | 0.002 2 |
AC | 0.06 | 1 | 0.06 | 0.03 | 0.864 0 |
BC | 4.08 | 1 | 4.08 | 2.31 | 0.172 5 |
A2 | 71.36 | 1 | 71.36 | 40.39 | 0.000 4 |
B2 | 293.59 | 1 | 293.59 | 166.16 | <0.000 1 |
C2 | 98.77 | 1 | 98.77 | 55.90 | 0.000 1 |
残差Residuals | 12.37 | 7 | 1.77 | ||
失拟误差Misfit error | 9.50 | 3 | 3.17 | 4.41 | 0.092 9 |
纯误差Pure error | 2.87 | 4 | 0.72 | ||
总和Sum | 692.37 | 16 |
表4 DJF水提物拟合二次多项式模型的方差分析
Table 4 Analysis of variance for DJF water extract fitting quadratic polynomial model
方差来源 Source of variance | 平方和 Sum of squares | 自由度 Degree of freedom | 均方 Mean square | F值 F value | P值 P value |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
模型 Model | 679.00 | 9 | 75.56 | 42.76 | <0.000 1 |
A:超声时间 Ultrasound time | 18.07 | 1 | 18.07 | 10.23 | 0.015 1* |
B:超声温度 Ultrasonic temperature | 82.27 | 1 | 82.27 | 46.56 | 0.000 2* |
C:液料比 Liquid-to-materialratio | 25.16 | 1 | 25.16 | 14.24 | 0.007 0** |
AB | 39.33 | 1 | 39.33 | 22.26 | 0.002 2 |
AC | 0.06 | 1 | 0.06 | 0.03 | 0.864 0 |
BC | 4.08 | 1 | 4.08 | 2.31 | 0.172 5 |
A2 | 71.36 | 1 | 71.36 | 40.39 | 0.000 4 |
B2 | 293.59 | 1 | 293.59 | 166.16 | <0.000 1 |
C2 | 98.77 | 1 | 98.77 | 55.90 | 0.000 1 |
残差Residuals | 12.37 | 7 | 1.77 | ||
失拟误差Misfit error | 9.50 | 3 | 3.17 | 4.41 | 0.092 9 |
纯误差Pure error | 2.87 | 4 | 0.72 | ||
总和Sum | 692.37 | 16 |
标品 Standard product | 线性回归方程 Linear regression equation | 决定系数 R2 |
---|---|---|
没食子酸Gallic acid | y=3 676 602.5x+12 429 215.1 | 0.999 2 |
绿原酸Chlorogenic acid | y=9 780 671.5x+25 070.5 | 0.999 5 |
儿茶素Catechins | y=18 976 942.0x-1 578 523.2 | 0.999 8 |
芦丁Rutin | y=8 195 692.0x-242 787.6 | 0.999 3 |
槲皮素Quercetin | y=5 324 594.0x+1 967 979.0 | 0.999 3 |
甘露糖Mannose | y=19 806.7+14 563 801.1x | 0.999 9 |
半乳糖Galactose | y=-7 354.5+11 882 050.3x | 0.999 8 |
葡萄糖Glucose | y=48 476.0+17 936 410.2x | 0.999 9 |
阿拉伯糖Arabinose | y=203 770.4+23 019 451.9x | 0.999 8 |
表5 标准品的线性回归方程及相关系数
Table 5 Linear regression equations and correlation coefficients for standards
标品 Standard product | 线性回归方程 Linear regression equation | 决定系数 R2 |
---|---|---|
没食子酸Gallic acid | y=3 676 602.5x+12 429 215.1 | 0.999 2 |
绿原酸Chlorogenic acid | y=9 780 671.5x+25 070.5 | 0.999 5 |
儿茶素Catechins | y=18 976 942.0x-1 578 523.2 | 0.999 8 |
芦丁Rutin | y=8 195 692.0x-242 787.6 | 0.999 3 |
槲皮素Quercetin | y=5 324 594.0x+1 967 979.0 | 0.999 3 |
甘露糖Mannose | y=19 806.7+14 563 801.1x | 0.999 9 |
半乳糖Galactose | y=-7 354.5+11 882 050.3x | 0.999 8 |
葡萄糖Glucose | y=48 476.0+17 936 410.2x | 0.999 9 |
阿拉伯糖Arabinose | y=203 770.4+23 019 451.9x | 0.999 8 |
标品 Standard product | 加标量 Amount of spike/(mg·mL-1) | 回收率 Recovery rate/% | 相对标准偏差 RSD/% |
---|---|---|---|
没食子酸 Gallic acid | 0.25 | 86.30 | 0.78 |
绿原酸 Chlorogenic acid | 0.25 | 88.90 | 1.27 |
儿茶素 Catechins | 0.50 | 90.10 | 0.39 |
芦丁 Rutin | 0.25 | 84.50 | 0.89 |
槲皮素 Quercetin | 0.13 | 83.70 | 0.54 |
甘露糖 Mannose | 0.25 | 89.76 | 0.65 |
半乳糖 Galactose | 0.25 | 92.45 | 0.32 |
葡萄糖 Glucose | 0.25 | 89.95 | 0.24 |
阿拉伯糖 Arabinose | 0.25 | 91.87 | 0.41 |
表6 加标回收率结果
Table 6 Recovery results for spikes
标品 Standard product | 加标量 Amount of spike/(mg·mL-1) | 回收率 Recovery rate/% | 相对标准偏差 RSD/% |
---|---|---|---|
没食子酸 Gallic acid | 0.25 | 86.30 | 0.78 |
绿原酸 Chlorogenic acid | 0.25 | 88.90 | 1.27 |
儿茶素 Catechins | 0.50 | 90.10 | 0.39 |
芦丁 Rutin | 0.25 | 84.50 | 0.89 |
槲皮素 Quercetin | 0.13 | 83.70 | 0.54 |
甘露糖 Mannose | 0.25 | 89.76 | 0.65 |
半乳糖 Galactose | 0.25 | 92.45 | 0.32 |
葡萄糖 Glucose | 0.25 | 89.95 | 0.24 |
阿拉伯糖 Arabinose | 0.25 | 91.87 | 0.41 |
1 | LIU R X, ZHAO Z Y, DAI S J,et al.. Identification and quantification of bioactive compounds in Diaphragma juglandis fructus by UHPLC-Q-orbitrap HRMS and UHPLC-MS/MS [J]. J. Agric. Food Chem.,2019,67(13):3811-3825. |
2 | CHEN Y, SUN X Q, FANG L T,et al.. Optimization of ultrasound-assisted extraction of polyphenols from Ilex latifolia using response surface methodology and evaluation of their antioxidant activity [J/OL]. Molecules, 2022,27(13):3999 [2023-10-23]. . |
3 | MENG Q R, WANG Y Q, CHEN F,et al..Polysaccharides from Diaphragma juglandis fructus:extraction optimization,antitumor,and immune-enhancement effects [J].Int.J.Biol.Macromol.,2018,115:835-845. |
4 | 洪茜茜,叶永丽,张银志,等.核桃分心木化学成分及功能活性研究进展[J].食品研究与开发,2021,42(7):194-202. |
HONG Q Q, YE Y L, ZHANG Y Z, et al.. Research progress on chemical constituents and functional activities of Diaphragma juglandis fructus [J]. Food Res.Dev.,2021,42(7):194-202. | |
5 | WEI N, WANG X S, WU Y Y, et al.. Comparative study on anti-inflammatory effect of polysaccharides from vinegar-baked Radix bupleuri using different methods [J].ACS Omega,2023,8(32):29253-29261. |
6 | HUANG X, LI S, DING R,et al.. Antitumor effects of polysaccharides from medicinal lower plants:a review [J/OL].Int. J. Biol. Macromol., 2023,252:126313 [2023-10-23].. |
7 | YAMAGUCHI T, YASUI K, FUJII S,et al.. Lentilactobacillus hilgardii H-50 strongly inhibits lipopolysaccharide-induced inflammatory responses in mouse splenocytes via its specific surface layer proteins [J/OL].J.Appl.Microbiol.,2023,134(3):lxad021 [2023-10-23].. |
8 | 蒋红芝,覃微,李海冬.核桃分心木单宁提取及其对羊毛的染色工艺[J].毛纺科技,2022,50(7):31-36. |
JIANG H Z, QIN W, LI H D. Study on extraction technology of tannin and dyeing technology of wool from walnut-wood [J].Wool Text. J.,2022,50(7):31-36. | |
9 | WANG S, WU H, ZHANG X,et al.. Preparation of nano-selenium from chestnut polysaccharide and characterization of its antioxidant activity [J/OL].Front. Nutr.,2022,9:1054601[2023-10-23]. . |
10 | 刘昕茹. 荞麦麸皮多酚的强化提取及其复合物的性质研究[D]. 天津:天津科技大学, 2022. |
LIU X R. Study on the intensified extraction of polyphenols from buckwheat bran and properties of their complex [D]. Tianjin: Tianjin University of Science and Technology, 2022. | |
11 | 熊芳芳,马佳琪,李敏.猴头菇菌渣中多糖提取工艺的优化及其体外抗氧化活性研究[J].饲料研究,2023,46(18):92-96. |
XIONG F F, MA J Q, LI M.Study on optimization of extraction process of polysaccharide from Hericium erinaceus residues and in vitro antioxidant activity [J]. Feed Res.,2023,46(18):92-96. | |
12 | 陈肖,曾维艳,王翔,等.草果中不同多酚类体外抗氧化活性研究[J].食品与发酵科技,2023,59(3):43-46, 75. |
CHEN X, ZENG W Y, WANG X, et al.. Study on in vitro antioxidant activities of polyphenols from Amomum tsaoko [J].Food Ferment. Sci. Technol., 2023,59(3):43-46, 75. | |
13 | 辛二娜. 黄粉虫抗氧化多糖的制备、纯化、分离及组成和活性研究[D]. 晋中:山西农业大学, 2022. |
XIN E N. Studies on the preparation,purification,isolation,composition and activity of the antioxidant Tenebrio molitor polysaccharide [D]. Jinzhong:Shanxi Agricultural University, 2022. | |
14 | MIAO J N, SHI W, ZHANG J Q,et al.. Response surface methodology for the fermentation of polysaccharides from Auricularia auricula using Trichoderma viride and their antioxidant activities [J].Int.J.Biol.Macromol.,2020,155:393-402. |
15 | 冯李院,侯洪波,邢江艳,等.响应面微波辅助酸法优化提取南瓜皮果胶工艺研究[J].包装与食品机械,2023,41(4):39-45. |
FENG L Y, HOU H B, XING J Y, et al.. Study on optimized extraction of pectin from pumpkin peel by response surface combined with microwave-assisted acid method [J].Packag.Food Mach., 2023,41(4):39-45. | |
16 | 张红娇. 紫苏多糖的分离纯化、结构表征及应用研究[D]. 太原:中北大学, 2022. |
ZHANG H J. Isolation, purification, structural characterization and application of perilla polysaccharides [D]. Taiyuan:North University of China, 2022. | |
17 | 张韬,陈启航,韦海秋,等.加拿大一枝黄花多糖提取工艺优化及抗氧化活性研究[J].浙江海洋大学学报(自然科学版),2022,41(3):272-278. |
ZHANG T, CHEN Q H, WEI H Q, et al.. Study on extraction process and antioxidant activity of Solidago canadensis L. [J]. J.Zhejiang Ocean. Univ. (Nat.Sci.), 2022,41(3):272-278. | |
18 | GAO J Y, HU D Y, SHEN Y, et al.. Optimization of ultrasonic-assisted polysaccharide extraction from Hyperici Perforati Herba using response surface methodology and assessment of its antioxidant activity [J]. Int. J. Biol. Macromol., 2023,225:255-265. |
19 | ZHENG J W, ZHANG X X, HERRERA-BALANDRANO D D, et al.. Extraction optimization of Arctium lappa L. polysaccharides by box-behnken response surface design and their antioxidant capacity [J/OL]. Starch-Stärke, 2022,74(9-10):2100305 [2023-10-23]. . |
20 | LIU J, BAI J, SHAO C,et al.. Optimization of ultrasound-assisted aqueous two-phase extraction of polysaccharides from seabuckthorn fruits using response methodology,physicochemical characterization and bioactivities [J]. J. Sci. Food Agric.,2023,103(6):3168-3183. |
21 | 李湘,文瑶.响应面法优化荞麦花黄酮提取工艺研究[J].云南化工,2023,50(8):38-41. |
LI X, WEN Y.Response surface methodology to optimize the extraction process of buckwheat flower flavonoids [J].Yunnan Chem. Technol.,2023,50(8):38-41. | |
22 | CHEN X Q, JIA X D, YANG S, et al.. Optimization of ultrasonic-assisted extraction of flavonoids,polysaccharides,and eleutherosides from Acanthopanax senticosus using response surface methodology in development of health wine [J/OL]. LWT, 2022,165:113725 [2023-10-23]. . |
23 | BU X Y, XU Y Q, ZHAO M M, et al.. Simultaneous extraction of polysaccharides and polyphenols from blackcurrant fruits:comparison between response surface methodology and artificial neural networks [J/OL]. Ind. Crops Prod., 2021,170:113682 [2023-10-23]. . |
24 | ZHANG H, LI H, ZHANG Z, et al.. Optimization of ultrasound-assisted extraction of polysaccharides from perilla seed meal by response surface methodology:characterization and in vitro antioxidant activities [J]. J. Food Sci., 2021,86(2):306-318. |
25 | 刘佳, 周亚梅, 张潇丹, 等. 响应面法优化牛膝多糖的微波法提取工艺研究[J]. 农产品加工, 2023(7): 27-31. |
LIU J, ZHOU Y M, ZHANG X D, et al.. Optmization of ultrasound-assisted extraction of tricholomamatsutake mycelium polysaccharide using response surface methology [J]. Agric. Prod. Process., 2023(7): 27-31. | |
26 | FENG Y N, ZHANG X F. Polysaccharide extracted from Huperzia serrata using response surface methodology and its biological activity [J]. Int. J. Biol. Macromol.,2020,157:267-275. |
27 | 侯登勇,张建,何颖,等.核桃分心木水提物抗疲劳作用研究[J].中国食物与营养,2021,27(9):73-77. |
HOU D Y, ZHANG J, HE Y,et al.. Anti-fatigue activity study of aqueous extract from diaphragma juglandis fructus in walnut [J].Food Nutr. China,2021,27(9):73-77. | |
28 | 吴修利,徐雷,谢英,等.超声波辅助提取油莎豆粕水溶性多糖及其抗氧化性[J].食品研究与开发,2022,43(16):81-87. |
WU X L, XU L, XIE Y,et al..Ultrasonic-assisted extraction and antioxidant activity of water-soluble polysaccharides from Cyperus esculentus meals [J]. Food Res. Dev.,2022,43(16):81-87. | |
29 | ZHANG X X, NI Z J, ZHANG F, et al.. Physicochemical and antioxidant properties of Lycium barbarum seed dreg polysaccharides prepared by continuous extraction [J/OL].Food Chem., 2022,14:100282 [2023-10-23]. . |
30 | MEDLEJ M K, CHERRI B, NASSER G, et al.. Optimization of polysaccharides extraction from a wild species of Ornithogalum combining ultrasound and maceration and their anti-oxidant properties [J]. Int. J. Biol. Macromol., 2020,161:958-968. |
[1] | 付硕硕, 龚伟勇, 林逸轩, 李渊顺, 刘澄灿, 倪林. 福建柏叶总二萜提取工艺优化及抑菌活性研究[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2025, 27(5): 146-155. |
[2] | 毛桃桃, 赵小强, 柏小栋, 余斌. 低温胁迫对玉米幼苗光合性能、抗氧化酶系统及相关基因表达的影响[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2025, 27(5): 49-60. |
[3] | 冯长龙, 宁辰阳, 朱艺鑫, 李树平, 黄春光. 树干绷带环形缠绕机构设计与优化研究[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2025, 27(3): 122-132. |
[4] | 罗金城, 朱晓林, 魏小红, 王贤, 王宝强, 杜雪芬. 番茄黄化曲叶病毒胁迫下外源NO对番茄抗氧化物酶基因表达的影响[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2025, 27(2): 125-135. |
[5] | 张如艳, 李绅昊, 朱奇鹏, 冯太纲, 李红波, 邢泽炳, 羡瑜. 生物炭含量对园林绿化废弃物/聚乳酸复合材料物理力学性能影响[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2025, 27(2): 192-200. |
[6] | 冯长龙, 黄春光, 宁辰阳, 李树平, 陈科锦. 植树机挖坑机构螺旋式钻头性能特性优化研究[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2025, 27(2): 89-98. |
[7] | 王雪, 郑星, 任佳淼, 赵亚周, 彭文君. 基于Plackett-Burman设计和响应面法优化枣花蜂蜜挥发性成分的萃取条件[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2025, 27(1): 181-192. |
[8] | 郗婧怡, 王双庆, 白一彤, 姚秀利, 黄碧璇, 李青怡, 范丽清, 黄世臣, 孙明国. 响应面法优化黑水虻处理餐厨垃圾工艺参数研究[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2025, 27(1): 241-249. |
[9] | 傅丽君, 林潇雨, 林建华, 沈慧男, 吴勇镇. 红松茸牛肉酱加工工艺及货架期研究[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2024, 26(6): 148-158. |
[10] | 张岚雄, 郑威, 陈源桉, 沈婧, 邹双全, 伍建榕, 倪林. 樟叶总木脂素提取工艺及其抑菌活性研究[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2024, 26(5): 138-147. |
[11] | 刘萌, 林辰壹, 吴瑞, 曹爽, 梁志豪, 张若楠. 香菇菌丝热胁迫响应及耐热综合评价[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2024, 26(5): 90-100. |
[12] | 刘东玲, 司皓, 郑宝江, 张玉红. 响应面法优化酶解辅助-超声提取菥蓂中的黑芥子苷[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2024, 26(4): 225-233. |
[13] | 陈颖, 刘小锋, 陈一萍, 廖丽萍, 傅洪涛. 紫外-可见光谱库在农药杀菌剂隐性排查中的应用[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2024, 26(12): 122-128. |
[14] | 纪蕾, 李红艳, 王颖, 姜晓东, 刘天红, 李晓, 孙元芹, 刘洪军. 番茄味膨化虾片加工工艺优化及香气组分分析[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2024, 26(1): 140-153. |
[15] | 贾滢暄, 张树林, 张达娟, 戴伟, 毕相东. 磷恢复对磷饥饿铜绿微囊藻光合色素和部分抗氧化酶活性的影响[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2024, 26(1): 70-77. |
阅读次数 | ||||||
全文 |
|
|||||
摘要 |
|
|||||