响应面法优化黑水虻处理餐厨垃圾工艺参数研究

doi:10.13304/j.nykjdb.2023.0283

中国农业科技导报 ›› 2025, Vol. 27 ›› Issue (1): 241-249.DOI: 10.13304/j.nykjdb.2023.0283

• 生物制造资源生态 • 上一篇

响应面法优化黑水虻处理餐厨垃圾工艺参数研究

郗婧怡¹(), 王双庆¹, 白一彤², 姚秀利², 黄碧璇², 李青怡², 范丽清²(), 黄世臣²(), 孙明国³

^1.延边大学农学院，吉林延吉 133002
^2.延边大学地理与海洋科学学院，吉林珲春 133300
^3.临江市特产业发展服务中心，吉林临江 134600

收稿日期:2023-04-11 接受日期:2023-06-23 出版日期:2025-01-15 发布日期:2025-01-21
通讯作者: 范丽清,黄世臣
作者简介:郗婧怡 E-mail：1622405870@qq.com
基金资助:
吉林省教育厅“十三五”产业化项目(JJKH20200519KJ);大学生创新创业训练计划项目(2023YDCXCY067)

Study on Optimization of Processing Parameters Using Hermetia illucens Larva to Treat Food Waste by Response Surface Methodology

Jingyi XI¹(), Shuangqing WANG¹, Yitong BAI², Xiuli YAO², Bixuan HUANG², Qingyi LI², Liqing FAN²(), Shichen HUANG²(), Mingguo SUN³

^1.Agricultural College，Yanbian University，Jilin Yanji 133002，China
^2.College of Geography and Marine Science，Yanbian University，Jilin Huichun 133300，China
^3.Linjiang Special Industry Development Service Center，Jilin Linjiang 134600，China

Received:2023-04-11 Accepted:2023-06-23 Online:2025-01-15 Published:2025-01-21
Contact: Liqing FAN,Shichen HUANG

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

为了利用黑水虻高效处理餐厨垃圾，提高资源化率，以黑水虻幼虫产量为响应值，利用响应面法，在Plackett-Burman（PB）试验基础上，通过Box-Behnken（BB）试验对环境温度、处理料含水率、日投料量、投放空间、初始虫龄、处理料透气性6个参数进行优化。PB试验结果表明，对黑水虻幼虫产量影响显著的因素依次为处理料含水量、环境温度、日投料量、投放空间和起始虫龄；BB试验结果表明，最佳幼虫产量条件为环境温度28 ℃，处理料含水量75%，日投料量26 g·千头^-1幼虫，投放空间1 443 cm³·千头^-1幼虫，初始虫龄6日龄；在此条件下可获得最大幼虫产量，达243.78 g，与模型预测值（243.82 g）相对误差较小，表明响应面法可以准确优化工艺参数。以上研究结果为黑水虻处理餐厨垃圾的生产实践提供理论依据。

关键词: 响应面法, 黑水虻, 餐厨垃圾, 工艺参数, 优化

Abstract:

In order to use Hermetia illucens to efficiently treat food waste and improve the resource utilization rate， the response surface method（RSM） was used to optimize six parameters， including ambient temperature， moisture content of treated material， daily materials added， living space， initial larva age and permeability of materials， based on the Plackett-Burman（PB） test and the Box- Behnken（BB） test， with the larval yield of Hermetia illucens as the response value. The results of PB test showed that the significant factors in response to the larval yield were moisture content of treated meterial， ambient temperature， daily materials added， living space and initial larva age. The results of BB test showed that the optimal conditions for larval yield were ambient temperature 28 ℃， moisture content of treatment material 75%， daily materials added 26 g·1 000 larva^-1， living space 1 443 cm³·1 000^-1 larva， and initial larva age 6 days； under this condition， the maximum larval yield of 243.78 g could be obtained， with a relatively small error compared to the predicted value of 243.82 g by the model，which indicated that response surface methodology could accurately optimize process parameters. Above results provided theoretical basis for the production practice of kitchen waste treatment by Hermetia illucens.

Key words: response surface methodology, Hermetia illucens, food waste, process parameters, optimization

中图分类号:

S185

郗婧怡, 王双庆, 白一彤, 姚秀利, 黄碧璇, 李青怡, 范丽清, 黄世臣, 孙明国. 响应面法优化黑水虻处理餐厨垃圾工艺参数研究[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2025, 27(1): 241-249.

Jingyi XI, Shuangqing WANG, Yitong BAI, Xiuli YAO, Bixuan HUANG, Qingyi LI, Liqing FAN, Shichen HUANG, Mingguo SUN. Study on Optimization of Processing Parameters Using Hermetia illucens Larva to Treat Food Waste by Response Surface Methodology[J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2025, 27(1): 241-249.

图/表 10

参考文献 20

1	杨森林,王科林,吴善荀,等.餐厨垃圾处置设施规划中对餐厨垃圾产生量的预测[J].环境卫生工程,2018,26(3):87-90.
	YANG S L, WANG K L, WU S X,et al.. Prediction on generation quantity of food waste in planning of kitchen waste disposal facilities [J]. Environ. Sanitation Eng., 2018,26 (3):87-90.
2	邓俊.餐厨垃圾无害化处理与资源化利用现状及发展趋势[J]. 环境工程技术学报,2019,9(6):637-642.
	DENG J. Harmless treatment and resource utilization of kitchen waste:development status and trend [J]. J. Environ. Eng. Technol., 2019,9(6):637-642.
3	LECLERE D, OBERSTEINER M, BARRETT M, et al.. Bending the curve of terrestrial biodiversity needs an integrated strategy [J]. Nature, 2020, 585:551-556.
4	吴修文,魏奎,沙莎,等.国内外餐厨垃圾处理现状及发展趋势[J].农业装备与车辆工程,2011(12):49-52, 62.
	WU X W, WEI K, SHA S, et al.. Present status and developing trend of kitchen garbage processing in China and abroad [J].Agric. Equip. Vehicle Eng., 2011(12):49-52, 62.
5	黄嘉晋,张启扬,沈耿哲,等.国内外厨余垃圾处理现状及MBT处理技术[J].山东化工,2017,46(7):217-219.
	HUANG J J, ZHANG Q Y, SHEN G Z, et al.. Current situation of kitchen waste treatment at home and abroad and MBT treatment technology [J]. Shandong Chem. Ind.,2017,46(7): 217-219.
6	孙艳艳,吕志坚.美国构建餐厨垃圾等级化处理体系[J].全球科技经济瞭望,2014,29(1):50-54.
	SUN Y Y, LYU Z J. Hierarchical food waste disposal system in the United States [J]. Global Sci., Technol. Econ. Outlook, 2014,29(1):50-54.
7	胡新军,张敏,余俊锋,等.中国餐厨垃圾处理的现状、问题和对策[J].生态学报,2012,32(14):4575-4584.
	HU X J, ZHANG M, YU J F, et al.. Food waste management in China: status,problems and solutions [J]. Acta Ecol. Sin., 2012,32(14):4575-4584.
8	姜虎,李文哲,刘建禹,等.城市餐厨垃圾资源化利用的问题和对策[J].环境科学与管理,2010,27(5):27-31.
	JIANG H, LI W Z, LIU J Y, et al.. Urban problems and countermeasures of kitchen waste utilization [J]. Environ. Sci. Manage., 2010,27(5):27-31.
9	安新城.黑水虻生物处置餐厨废弃物的技术可行性分析[J].环境与可持续发展,2016,41(3): 92-94.
	AN X C. Reliability analysis about technology for using black soldier fly on bioconversion from food waste to entomic protein [J]. Environ. Sustain. Dev., 2016,41(3): 92-94.
10	喻国辉,陈燕红,喻子牛,等.黑水虻幼虫和预蛹的饲料价值研究进展[J].昆虫知识, 2009,46(1): 41-45.
	YU G H, CHEN Y H, YU Z N, et al.. Research progression on the larvae and prepupae of black soldier fly Hermetia illucens used as animal feedstuff [J]. Chin. Bull. Entomol., 2009,46(1): 41-45.
11	强敬雯,王晚晴,唐曼玉,等.黑水虻转化厨余垃圾及产品应用相关研究进展[J].饲料工业,2023,44(6):25-32.
	QIANG J W, WANG W Q, TANG M Y, et al.. Research progress of kitchen waste transformation and product application of black soldier fly [J]. Feed Ind., 2023,44(6):25-32.
12	高银柳.厨余垃圾处理现状及黑水虻工厂化模式的思考[J].中国高新科技, 2022(24):88-90.
	GAO Y L.Present situation of kitchen waste treatment and thoughts of the industrial mode of the black soldier fly [J]. China High New Technol., 2022(24):88-90.
13	唐杏雨,理俊霞,王浩琳,等.响应面法优化黑水虻幼虫蛋白肽的制备工艺[J].现代畜牧科技, 2023(4):6-11.
	TANG X Y, LI J X, WANG H L, et al.. Optimization of preparation process of black soldier fly larval protein peptides by response surface method [J]. Mod. Anim. Husb. Sci. Technol., 2023(4):6-11.
14	许方园,姜朝武,周锋.“无废城市”背景下餐厨垃圾处理技术研究进展[J].中国资源综合利用,2023,41(3):101-104.
	XU F Y, JIANG C W, ZHOU F. Research progress of kitchen waste treatment technology under the background of “Zero-waste City” [J]. China Resour. Comprehensive Util.,2023,41(3):101-104.
15	CHIA S Y, TANGA C M, KHAMIS F M, et al..Threshold temperatures and thermal requirements of black soldier fly Hermetia illucens: implications for mass production [J/OL]. PLoS One, 2018,3(11): e0206097 [2023-03-11]. .
16	LOGAN L A P, LATTY T, ROBERTS T H. Effective bioconversion of farmed chicken products by black soldier fly larvae at commercially relevant growth temperature [J]. J. Appl. Entomol., 2021, 145(6):621-628.
17	赵春波.湿热解技术在餐厨垃圾预处理工程中的应用[J].节能与环保,2022(5):80-81.
	ZHAO C B. Application of hygrothermal hydrolysis technology in food waste pretreatment project [J]. Energy Conserv. Environ. Protect.,2022(5):80-81.
18	喻国辉,李一平,杨玉环,等.低含水量饲料对黑水虻生长发育的影响[J].昆虫学报,2014,57(8):943-950.
	YU G H, LI Y P, YANG Y H, et al.. Effects of the artificial diet with low water content on the growth and development of the black soldier fly, Hermetia illucens [J]. Acta Entomol. Sin., 2014,57(8):943-950.
19	徐齐云,龙镜池,叶明强,等.黑水虻幼虫的发育速率及食物转化率研究[J].环境昆虫学报, 2014, 36(4):561-564.
	XU Q Y, LONG J C, YE M Q, et al.. Development rate and food conversion efficiency of black soldier fly, Hermetia illucens [J]. J. Environ. Entomol., 2014,36(4):561-564.
20	张家宝,唐凯琳,曾境聪,等.餐厨垃圾中影响黑水虻幼虫生长性能的因素及其研究进展[J].家畜生态学报,2023,44(4):7-12.
	ZHANG J B, TANG K L, ZENG J C,et al.. Factors affecting the growth performance of black soldier fly larvae in food waste and its research progress [J]. J. Domestic Ecol., 2023, 44(4):7-12.

变量 Variate	水平 Level
变量 Variate	-1	+1
x₁：环境温度 Ambient temperature/℃	20	30
x₂：处理料含水量 Moisture content of treated material/%	50	80
x₃：日投料量 Daily materials added/g	10	30
x₄：投放空间 Living space/cm³	1 200	1 600
x₅：起始虫龄 Initial larva age/d	4	10
x₆：处理料透气性 Permeability of materials/%	0	50

变量 Variate	水平 Level
变量 Variate	-1	+1
x₁：环境温度 Ambient temperature/℃	20	30
x₂：处理料含水量 Moisture content of treated material/%	50	80
x₃：日投料量 Daily materials added/g	10	30
x₄：投放空间 Living space/cm³	1 200	1 600
x₅：起始虫龄 Initial larva age/d	4	10
x₆：处理料透气性 Permeability of materials/%	0	50

变量Variate	水平Level
变量Variate	-1	0	+1
x₁：环境温度 Ambient temperature/℃	26	28	30
x₂：处理料含水量 Moisture content of treated material/%	70	75	80
x₃：日投料量 Daily materials added/g	20	25	30
x₄：投放空间 Living space/cm³	1 200	1400	1 600
x₅：起始虫龄 Initial larva age/d	4	6	8

变量Variate	水平Level
变量Variate	-1	0	+1
x₁：环境温度 Ambient temperature/℃	26	28	30
x₂：处理料含水量 Moisture content of treated material/%	70	75	80
x₃：日投料量 Daily materials added/g	20	25	30
x₄：投放空间 Living space/cm³	1 200	1400	1 600
x₅：起始虫龄 Initial larva age/d	4	6	8

变异源 Source of variance	自由度 Degrees of freedom	平方和 Sum square	均方 Mean square	F值 F value	P值 P value
模型 Model	6	56 034.84	9 339.14	46.2	<0.000 1
误差 Error	16	2 723.86	170.24
失拟项 Lack of fit	1	712.86	712.86	4.19	0.057 5
总和 Sum	23	59 471.56

响应面法优化黑水虻处理餐厨垃圾工艺参数研究

Study on Optimization of Processing Parameters Using Hermetia illucens Larva to Treat Food Waste by Response Surface Methodology

RichHTML

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 10

参考文献 20

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

试验号Test number	x₁：环境温度 Ambient temperature/℃	x₂：处理料含水量Moisture content of treated material/%	x₃：日投料量 Daily materials added/g	x₄：投放空间 Living space/cm³	x₅：起始虫龄 Initial larva age/d	x₆：处理料透气性 Permeability of materials/%	Y：幼虫产量Larvae yield/g
1	20	50	30	1 600	4	0	42.91
2	20	80	10	1 200	10	0	38.35
3	30	80	30	1 600	10	50	181.77
4	30	50	10	1 200	4	50	38.00
5	30	80	10	1 600	4	0	111.43
6	20	80	10	1 200	10	0	51.10
7	20	50	10	1 600	10	50	19.11
8	20	50	30	1 600	4	0	46.91
9	30	50	30	1 200	10	0	88.93
10	30	80	30	1 600	10	50	146.00
11	30	50	10	1 200	4	50	25.01
12	30	80	10	1 600	4	0	111.92
13	30	80	30	1 600	10	50	202.07
14	20	80	10	1 200	10	0	36.70
15	20	80	30	1 200	4	50	108.27
16	30	50	30	1 200	10	0	115.93
17	30	80	10	1 600	4	0	122.66
18	20	80	30	1 200	4	50	89.91
19	20	50	30	1 600	4	0	52.53
20	20	50	10	1 600	10	50	39.38
21	30	50	10	1 200	4	50	35.00

试验号Test number	x₁：环境温度 Ambient temperature/℃	x₂：处理料含水量Moisture content of treated material/%	x₃：日投料量 Daily materials added/g	x₄：投放空间 Living space/cm³	x₅：起始虫龄 Initial larva age/d	x₆：处理料透气性 Permeability of materials/%	Y：幼虫产量Larvae yield/g
22	20	50	10	1 600	10	50	22.81
23	20	80	30	1 200	4	50	98.37
24	30	50	30	1 200	10	0	98.83

模型项 Model item	回归系数 Coefficient of regression	标准差 Standard deviation	F值 F value	P值 P value
x₁：环境温度Ambient temperature/℃	26.31	2.9	82.17	<0.000 1
x₂：处理料含水量Moisture content of treated material/%	28.03	2.9	93.30	<0.000 1
x₃：日投料量Daily materials added/g	25.86	2.9	79.38	<0.000 1
x₄：投放空间Living space/cm³	11.47	2.9	15.61	0.001 0
x₅：起始虫龄Initial larva age/d	6.59	2.9	5.16	0.036 4
x₆：处理料透气性Permeability of materials/%	3.63	2.9	1.57	0.227 6

试验号 Test number	x₁环境温度 Ambient temperature/℃	x₂：处理料含水量 Moisture content of treated material/%	x₃：日投料量 Daily materials added/g	x₄：投放空间 Living space/cm³	x₅：起始虫龄 Initial larva age/d	Y：幼虫产量Larvae yield/g
33	28	75	30	1 400	8	237.04
34	28	75	25	1 400	6	243.14
35	28	70	25	1 400	4	231.63
36	26	80	25	1 400	6	221.36
37	26	75	20	1 400	6	224.45
38	30	75	25	1 600	6	224.78
39	30	75	25	1 400	4	227.27
40	28	70	25	1 200	6	228.62
41	28	75	25	1 600	8	241.14
42	28	75	20	1 600	6	234.83
43	28	75	25	1 400	6	242.64
44	26	75	30	1 400	6	223.85
45	28	75	20	1 200	6	233.63
46	28	80	30	1 400	6	232.63

项目 Item	平方和 Sum square	自由度 Degrees of freedom	均方 Mean square	F值 F value	P值 P value
模型 model	2 254.442 000	20	112.722 100	120.408 700	<0.000 1
x₁	41.538 020	1	41.538 020	44.370 540	<0.000 1
x₂	9.317 756	1	9.317 756	9.953 142	0.004 1
x₃	11.088 900	1	11.088 900	11.845 060	0.002 0
x₄	62.568 100	1	62.568 100	66.834 670	<0.000 1
x₅	7.466 556	1	7.466 556	7.975 707	0.009 2
x₁x₂	0.000 000	1	0.000 000	0.000 000	1.000 0
x₁x₃	1.452 025	1	1.452 025	1.551 040	0.224 5
x₁x₄	0.065 025	1	0.065 025	0.069 459	0.794 3
x₁x₅	0.062 500	1	0.062 500	0.066 762	0.798 2
x₂x₃	0.422 500	1	0.422 500	0.451 311	0.507 9
x₂x₄	7.290 000	1	7.290 000	7.787 111	0.009 9
x₂x₅	8.094 025	1	8.094 025	8.645 963	0.007 0
x₃x₄	3.240 000	1	3.240 000	3.460 938	0.074 6
x₃x₅	0.245 025	1	0.245 025	0.261 733	0.613 4
x₄x₅	14.100 030	1	14.100 030	15.061 520	0.000 7
x₁²	1 881.015 000	1	1 881.015 000	2 009.283 000	<0.000 1
x₂²	366.673 800	1	366.673 800	391.677 600	<0.000 1
x₃²	107.278 500	1	107.278 500	114.593 900	<0.000 1
x₄²	427.560 000	1	427.560 000	456.715 700	<0.000 1
x₅²	43.084 180	1	43.084 180	46.022 120	<0.000 1
残差 Residual	23.404 060	25	0.936 162
失拟项 Lack of fit	21.770 730	20	1.088 536	3.332 254	0.093 0
纯误差 Pure error	1.633 333	5	0.326 667
总和 Sum	2 277.846 000	45

试验号 Test number	x₁环境温度 Ambient temperature/℃	x₂：处理料含水量 Moisture content of treated material/%	x₃：日投料量 Daily materials added/g	x₄：投放空间 Living space/cm³	x₅：起始虫龄 Initial larva age/d	Y：幼虫产量Larvae yield/g
1	28	75	20	1 400	4	236.84
2	28	80	25	1 400	4	238.03
3	28	75	30	1 400	4	236.03
4	28	75	25	1 400	6	242.94
5	30	75	25	1 400	8	228.57
6	30	70	25	1 400	6	223.58
7	28	75	25	1 600	4	234.73
8	28	80	20	1 400	6	234.53
9	28	75	25	1 200	4	232.33
10	28	70	20	1 400	6	233.73
11	28	70	30	1 400	6	233.13
12	30	75	25	1 200	6	221.58
13	26	75	25	1 400	4	224.35
14	28	80	25	1 600	6	233.33
15	28	80	25	1 400	8	235.44
16	30	80	25	1 400	6	224.48
17	28	75	30	1 600	6	234.33
18	28	75	25	1 400	6	243.04
19	28	75	25	1 400	6	243.74
20	26	75	25	1 200	6	217.85
21	28	75	30	1 200	6	229.53
22	26	70	25	1 400	6	220.46
23	28	80	25	1 200	6	227.42
24	26	75	25	1 400	8	225.15
25	26	75	25	1 600	6	221.56
26	30	75	20	1 400	6	228.78
27	28	70	25	1 400	8	234.73
28	28	75	25	1 400	6	243.34
29	28	75	20	1 400	8	238.84
30	30	75	30	1 400	6	225.77
31	28	75	25	1 200	8	231.23
32	28	70	25	1 600	6	229.13

[1]	谢勇俊, 潘小卓, 陈福慧, 尹凯波, 金嘉悦, 王一兵. 人参酚酸类自毒物质降解菌的筛选鉴定及生防研究[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2024, 26(7): 147-155.
[2]	傅丽君, 林潇雨, 林建华, 沈慧男, 吴勇镇. 红松茸牛肉酱加工工艺及货架期研究[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2024, 26(6): 148-158.
[3]	郭思柔, 温晓蕾, 栗佳宁, 王建华, 孙伟明, 冯丽娜, 齐慧霞. 板栗黄化皱缩病检测方法优化及10个板栗品种抗性鉴定[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2024, 26(6): 226-233.
[4]	施琳波, 彭晴, 徐小轻, 张宇微, 杨硕, 田丹丹, 何孟欣, 石波, 乔宇. 共培养干酪乳杆菌NA-2和鼠李糖乳杆菌LGG对抑菌活性的影响[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2024, 26(6): 63-71.
[5]	张岚雄, 郑威, 陈源桉, 沈婧, 邹双全, 伍建榕, 倪林. 樟叶总木脂素提取工艺及其抑菌活性研究[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2024, 26(5): 138-147.
[6]	刘东玲, 司皓, 郑宝江, 张玉红. 响应面法优化酶解辅助-超声提取菥蓂中的黑芥子苷[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2024, 26(4): 225-233.
[7]	杨大芳, 李飞翔, 葛越锋, 李奕辰. 基于离散元法的外槽轮排肥器排肥性能研究[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2024, 26(12): 88-97.
[8]	陈子民, 莫江婷, 陈广生, 郭小璇, 朱贤文. 基于Fluent的顶风式热泵干燥箱气流场分析及优化[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2024, 26(10): 135-144.
[9]	郭带贵, 廖宇兰, 张惜辉, 袁成宇, 吴中野. 木薯种植机参数优化与试验[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2023, 25(9): 122-130.
[10]	李琦, 张树林, 张达娟, 贾滢暄, 王泽斌. 响应面法改良牟氏角毛藻培养基[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2023, 25(8): 225-233.
[11]	赵秀英, 黄晴雯, 曹浩杰, 王杰, 李瑞姣, 聂冬霞, 韩铮, 赵志辉. 响应面法优化禾谷镰刀菌产脱氧雪腐镰刀菌烯醇及其衍生物的液体培养条件[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2023, 25(7): 222-233.
[12]	强敬雯, 王晚晴, 唐曼玉, 武双, 华威, 朱欣悦, 程艳玲. 黑水虻虫沙在肥料应用中的研究进展[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2023, 25(5): 158-167.
[13]	肖芬芳, 张从合, 王慧, 叶亚峰, 张道林, 汪和廷, 李波, 吴跃进, 刘斌美. 杂交水稻花粉收集装置气力输送系统仿真优化[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2023, 25(4): 110-122.
[14]	柯昊纯, 李琨, 程瑞锋. 营养液紫外LED杀菌模组仿真与响应面法优化[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2023, 25(4): 132-146.
[15]	于淼, 周海宾, 丁京涛, 程红胜, 沈玉君, 范盛远, 张曦, 王健, 徐鹏翔, 程琼仪. 基于EDEM的餐厨垃圾组成颗粒间接触参数标定[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2023, 25(12): 111-120.