Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology ›› 2022, Vol. 24 ›› Issue (5): 189-201.DOI: 10.13304/j.nykjdb.2021.0119
• BIO-MANUFACTURING & RESOURCE AND ECOLOGY • Previous Articles
Liangxiang DAI(), Guanchu ZHANG, Hong DING, Yang XU, Zhimeng ZHANG()
Received:
2021-02-01
Accepted:
2021-04-15
Online:
2022-05-15
Published:
2022-06-06
Contact:
Zhimeng ZHANG
通讯作者:
张智猛
作者简介:
戴良香 E-mail:liangxiangd@163.com;
基金资助:
CLC Number:
Liangxiang DAI, Guanchu ZHANG, Hong DING, Yang XU, Zhimeng ZHANG. Effects of Organic Fertilizer and Calcium Fertilizer on Peanut Rhizosphere Bacterial Community Structure in Saline-alkali Soil[J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2022, 24(5): 189-201.
戴良香, 张冠初, 丁红, 徐扬, 张智猛. 有机肥和钙肥对盐碱土花生根际细菌群落结构的影响[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2022, 24(5): 189-201.
采样地点 Sampling site | 含盐量 Salt content/(g·kg-1) | 有机质含量 Organic matter/ (g·kg-1) | 全氮 Total nitrogen/(g·kg-1) | 碱解氮 Available nitrogen/ (mg·kg-1) | 速效磷 Available phosphorus/(mg·kg-1) | 速效钾 Available potasium/ (mg·kg-1) | pH |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
利津毛坨 Maotuo of Lijin County | 5.17 | 6.45 | 0.612 | 54.35 | 9.82 | 115.17 | 8.6 |
垦利青坨 Qingtuo of Kenli County | 3.91 | 11.40 | 0.892 | 69.06 | 14.08 | 89.76 | 8.4 |
Table 1 Characteristics of soil samples for test
采样地点 Sampling site | 含盐量 Salt content/(g·kg-1) | 有机质含量 Organic matter/ (g·kg-1) | 全氮 Total nitrogen/(g·kg-1) | 碱解氮 Available nitrogen/ (mg·kg-1) | 速效磷 Available phosphorus/(mg·kg-1) | 速效钾 Available potasium/ (mg·kg-1) | pH |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
利津毛坨 Maotuo of Lijin County | 5.17 | 6.45 | 0.612 | 54.35 | 9.82 | 115.17 | 8.6 |
垦利青坨 Qingtuo of Kenli County | 3.91 | 11.40 | 0.892 | 69.06 | 14.08 | 89.76 | 8.4 |
处理 Treatment | 丰富度 Community richness | 多样性 Community diversity | 覆盖度 Coverage | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Sobs | Chao | Ace | Shannon | Simpson | ||
CK1 | 3 216.5 | 3 508.856 | 3 459.115 | 7.253 0 | 0.001 34 | 0.991 11 |
C1 | 3 271.0 | 3 513.107 | 3 453.484 | 6.792 7 | 0.005 44 | 0.995 60 |
M1 | 3 400.5 | 3 626.337 | 3 578.135 | 7.247 3 | 0.001 50 | 0.993 79 |
MC1 | 3 211.5 | 3 484.869 | 3 442.857 | 7.171 5 | 0.001 62 | 0.991 75 |
CK2 | 3 142.5 | 3 466.744 | 3 414.230 | 7.120 0 | 0.001 84 | 0.989 75 |
C2 | 3 292.0 | 3 585.756 | 3 524.607 | 6.996 1 | 0.003 06 | 0.993 03 |
M2 | 3 163.5 | 3 405.369 | 3 350.942 | 6.822 0 | 0.003 65 | 0.995 00 |
MC2 | 3 227.5 | 3 497.223 | 3 448.287 | 6.745 6 | 0.006 47 | 0.993 16 |
Table 2 Alpha diversity index of rhizosphere soil samples in each treatment
处理 Treatment | 丰富度 Community richness | 多样性 Community diversity | 覆盖度 Coverage | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Sobs | Chao | Ace | Shannon | Simpson | ||
CK1 | 3 216.5 | 3 508.856 | 3 459.115 | 7.253 0 | 0.001 34 | 0.991 11 |
C1 | 3 271.0 | 3 513.107 | 3 453.484 | 6.792 7 | 0.005 44 | 0.995 60 |
M1 | 3 400.5 | 3 626.337 | 3 578.135 | 7.247 3 | 0.001 50 | 0.993 79 |
MC1 | 3 211.5 | 3 484.869 | 3 442.857 | 7.171 5 | 0.001 62 | 0.991 75 |
CK2 | 3 142.5 | 3 466.744 | 3 414.230 | 7.120 0 | 0.001 84 | 0.989 75 |
C2 | 3 292.0 | 3 585.756 | 3 524.607 | 6.996 1 | 0.003 06 | 0.993 03 |
M2 | 3 163.5 | 3 405.369 | 3 350.942 | 6.822 0 | 0.003 65 | 0.995 00 |
MC2 | 3 227.5 | 3 497.223 | 3 448.287 | 6.745 6 | 0.006 47 | 0.993 16 |
Fig. 2 Diversity index of rhizosphere soil microorganism in different treatmentsNote: * and ** indicate significant differences among treatments at P<0.05 and P<0.01 levels, respectively.
1 | 贾敬敦,张富.依靠科技创新推进我国盐碱地资源可持续利用[J].中国农业科技导报,2014,16(5):1-7. |
JIA J D, ZHANG F. Sustainable utilization of saline-alkali land resources through scientific and technological innovation in China [J]. J. Agric. Sci. Technol., 2014, 16(5):1-7. | |
2 | 张智猛,慈敦伟,丁红,等.花生品种耐盐性指标筛选与综合评价[J].应用生态学报,2013,24(12):3487-3494. |
ZHANG Z M, CI D W, DING H, et al.. Indices selection and comprehensive evaluation of salinity tolerance for peanut varieties [J]. Chin. J. Appl. Ecol., 2013, 24(12):3487-3494. | |
3 | 慈敦伟,张智猛,丁红,等.花生苗期耐盐性评价及耐盐指标筛选[J].生态学报,2015,35(3):805-814. |
CI D W, ZHANG Z M, DING H,et al..Evaluation and selection indices of salinity tolerance in peanut seedling [J]. Acta Ecol. Sin., 2015, 35(3):805-814. | |
4 | 张旭龙,马淼,吴振振,等.不同油葵品种对盐碱地根际土壤酶活性及微生物群落功能多样性的影响[J].生态学报,2017, 37(5):1659-1666. |
ZHANG X L, MA M, WU Z Z, et al..Effects of Helianthus annuus varieties on rhizosphere soil enzyme activities and microbial community functional diversity of saline-alkali land in Xinjiang [J]. Acta Ecol. Sin., 2017, 37(5):1659-1666. | |
5 | ZHANG Q, YU X. Allelopathy in replant problem in forest soil [J]. Allelopathy J., 2001, 8:51-64. |
6 | KUZYAKOV Y, RAZAVI B S. Rhizosphere size and shape: temporal dynamics and spatial stationarity [J]. Soil Biol. Biochem., 2019, 135:343-360. |
7 | CORREA-GALEOTE D, BEDMAR E J, FERNÁNDEZ-GONZÁLEZ A J, et al.. Bacterial communities in the rhizosphere of amilaceous maize (Zea mays L.) as assessed by pyrosequencing [J/OL]. Frontiers Plant Sci., 2016, 7:1016 [2020-12-20]. . |
8 | SINGH A, SARMA B K, UPADHYAY R S, et al.. Compatible rhizosphere microbes mediated alleviation of biotic stress in chickpea through enhanced antioxidant and phenylpropanoid activities [J]. Microbiol. Res., 2013, 168(1):33-40. |
9 | HAW-KINS H J, LEW IS O A M. Effect of NaCl salinity, nitrogen form, calcium and potassium concentration on nitrogen uptake and kinetics in Triticum aestivum L. cv. gamtoos [J]. New Phytol., 1993,124:171-177. |
10 | CAINES A M, SHENNAN C. Interactive effects of Ca2+ and NaCl salinity on the growth of two tomato genotypes differing in Ca2+ use efficiency [J]. Plant Physiol. Biochem., 1999, 37:569-576. |
11 | 李银鹏,林鹏.盐度对木榄幼苗某些金属元素累积的影响及钙的效应[J].应用生态学报,2000,11(2):177-180. |
LI Y P, LIN P. Impact of salinity on accumulation of several metal elements in Bruguiera gymnorrhiza seedlings and Ca effect [J]. Chin. J. Appl. Ecol., 2000, 11(2):177-180. | |
12 | EHRHARDT D W, WAIS R, LONG S R. Calcium spiking in plant root hairs responding to Rhizobium nodulation signals [J]. Cell, 1996, 85:673-681. |
13 | CHIEN C T, SHETTY K, MORTIMER M, et al.. Calcium-induced salt tolerance in Rhizobium leguminosarum biovarviciae strain C124b [J]. FEMS Microbiol. Lett., 1991, 83:219-224. |
14 | 孟磊,丁维新,蔡祖聪.长期定量施肥对土壤有机碳储量和土壤呼吸影响[J].地球科学进展,2005,20(6):687-692. |
MENG L, DING W X, CAI Z C, et al.. Storage of soil organic C and soil respirationas effected by long-term quantitative fertilization [J]. Adv. Earth Sci., 2005, 20(6):687-692. | |
15 | WANG X L, REN Y Y, ZHANG S Q, et al.. Applications of organic manure increased maize (Zea mays L.) yield and water productivity in a semi-arid region [J]. Agric. Water Manage., 2017, 187:88-98. |
16 | 孙薇,钱勋,付青霞,等.生物有机肥对秦巴山区核桃园土壤微生物群落和酶活性的影响[J].植物营养与肥料学报,2013,19(5):1224-1233. |
SUN W, QIAN X, FU Q X, et al.. Effects of bio-organic fertilizer on soil microbial community and enzymes activities in walnut orchards of the Qinling-Bashan Region [J]. J. Plant Nutr. Fert., 2013, 19(5):1224-1233. | |
17 | 范丙全.我国生物肥料研究与应用进展[J].植物营养与肥料学报,2017,23(6):1602-1613. |
FAN B Q. Advances in biofertilizer research and development in China [J]. J. Plant Nutr. Fert., 2017, 23(6):1602-1613. | |
18 | LIU B, TU C, HU S, et al.. Effect of organic, sustainable, and conventional management strategies in grower fields on soil physical, chemical, and biological factors and the incidence of southern blight [J]. Appl. Soil Ecol., 2007, 37(3):202-214. |
19 | WEI S, TETSUO T, LIU S K. Isolation and characterization of an alkaliphilic and halotolerant Nesterenkonia. sp from an extreme soda saline-alkali soil in the northeastern of China [J]. Mol. Soil Biol., 2011, 64(11):914-920. |
20 | CUI C, MA L, SHI J, et al.. Metabolic pathway for degradation of nthracene by halophilic Martelella sp. AD-3 [J]. Int. Biodeterior. Biodegrad., 2014, 89(2):67-73. |
21 | 李凤霞,郭永忠,许兴.盐碱地土壤微生物生态特征研究进展[J].安徽农业科学,2011,39(23):14065-14067, 14174. |
LI F X, GUO Y Z, XU X. Research progress of the microbial characteristics of saline-alkali soil [J]. J. Anhui Agric. Sci., 2011, 39(23):14065-14067, 14174. | |
22 | 李瀚,杨吉顺,张冠初,等.花生品种萌发期耐盐性比较鉴定[J].花生学报,2015,44(4):48-52. |
LI H, YANG J S, ZHANG G C, et al.. Identification of salt tolerancein germination period of peanut varieties [J]. J. Peant Sci., 2015, 44(4):48-52. | |
23 | 慈敦伟,戴良香,宋文武,等.花生萌发至苗期耐盐胁迫的基因型差异[J].植物生态学报,2013, 37(11):1018-1027. |
CI D W, DAI L X, SONG W W, et al.. Genotypic differences in salt tolerance from germination to seedling stage in peanut [J]. Chin. J. Plant Ecol., 2013, 37(11):1018-1027. | |
24 | 温赛群.苗期花生品种耐盐性鉴定及生理生化评价[D].河北保定:河北农业大学,2019. |
WEN S Q. Identification of salt tolerance of peanut germplasm and physiological evaluation [D]. Hebei Baoding: Hebei Agricultural University, 2019. | |
25 | 田家明,张智猛,戴良香,等.外源钙对盐碱土与非盐碱土花生生长发育与光合特性的影响[J].华北农学报,2018,33(6):130-136. |
TIAN J M, ZHANG Z M, DAI L X, et al.. Effects of exogenous calcium on the development and photosynthetic characteristics of peanut in saline-alkali soil and normal soil [J]. Acta Agric. Boreali-Sin., 2018, 33(6):130 -136. | |
26 | 张冠初,史晓龙,慈敦伟,等.干旱和盐胁迫对花生干物质积累及光合特性的影响[J].核农学报,2019,33(5):999-1005. |
ZHANG G C, SHI X L, CI D W, et al.. Effect of drought and salt stress on accumulation of plant dry weight and photosynthetic characteristics [J]. J. Nucl. Agric. Sci., 2019, 33(5):999-1005. | |
27 | 张冠初,张智猛,慈敦伟,等.干旱和盐胁迫对花生渗透调节和抗氧化酶活性的影响[J].华北农学报,2018,33(3):176-181. |
ZHANG G C, ZHANG Z M, CI D W, et al.. Effects of drought and salt stress on osmotic regulator and antioxidase activities [J]. Acta Agric. Boreali-Sin., 2018, 33(3):176-181. | |
28 | 史晓龙,张智猛,戴良香,等.外源施钙对盐胁迫下花生营养元素吸收与分配的影响[J].应用生态报,2018,29(10):3302-3310. |
SHI X L, ZHANG Z M, DAI L X, et al.. Effects of calcium fertilizer application on absorption and distribution of nutrients in peanut under salt stress [J]. Chin. J. Appl. Ecol., 2018, 29(10):3302-3310. | |
29 | DAI L X, ZHANG G C, YU Z P, et al.. Effect of drought stress and developmental stages on microbial community structure and diversity in peanut rhizosphere soil [J/OL]. Int. J. Mol. Sci., 2019, 20(9):2265 [2020-12-20]. . |
30 | 孙波,赵其国,张桃林,等.土壤质量与持续环境 Ⅲ:土壤质量评价的生物学指标[J].土壤,1997,29(5):225-234. |
SUN B, ZHAO Q G, ZANG T L, et al.. Soil quality and sustainable environment Ⅲ: biological indicators of soil quality evaluation [J]. Soils, 1997, 29(5):225-234. | |
31 | STENBERG B. Monitoring soil quality of arable land: microbiological indicators [J]. Acta Agric. Scandinavica, 1999, 49(1):1-24. |
32 | WINDING A, HUND-RINKE K, RUTGERS M. The use of microorganisms in ecological soil classification and assessment concepts [J]. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Safety, 2005, 62(2):230-248. |
33 | 张瑜斌,林鹏,魏小勇,等.盐度对稀释平板法研究红树林区土壤微生物数量的影响[J].生态学报,2008,28:1288-1296. |
ZHANG Y B, LIN P, WEI X Y, et al.. Effect of salinity on microbial densities of soil in the dilution plate technique applied in mangrove areas [J]. Acta Ecol. Sin., 2008, 28:1288-1296. | |
34 | KHAN K S, GATTINGER A, BUEGGER F, et al.. Microbial use of organic amendments in saline soils monitored by changes in the 13C/12C ratio [J]. Soil Biol. Biochem., 2008, 40(5):1217-1224. |
35 | 乔正良,来航线,强郁荣,等.陕西主要盐碱土中微生物生态初步研究[J].西北农业学报,2006,15(3):60-64. |
QIAO Z L, LAI H X, QIANG Y R, et al.. Primary study on microorganism ecology in saline-alkali soil of Shaanxi Province [J]. Acta Agric. Bor-Occid. Sin., 2006, 15(3):60-64. | |
36 | 李新,焦燕,杨铭德.用磷脂脂肪酸(PLFA)谱图技术分析内蒙古河套灌区不同盐碱程度土壤微生物群落多样性[J].生态科学,2014,33(3):488-494. |
LI X, JIAO Y, YANG M D. Microbial diversity of different saline-alkaline soil analyzing by PLFA in the Hetao area of Inner Mongolia [J]. Ecol. Sci., 2014, 33(3):488-494. | |
37 | 牛世全,景彩虹,廖世齐,等.河西走廊盐碱土细菌种群结构多样性的研究[J].西北师范大学学报(自然科学版),2013,49(2):90-95. |
NIU S Q, JING C H, LIAO S Q, et al.. Bacterial population structure diversity in saline-alkali soil in Hexi Corridor [J]. J. Northwest Normal Univ. (Nat. Sci.), 2013, 49(2):90-95. | |
38 | 黄明勇,杨剑芳,王怀锋,等.天津滨海盐碱土地区城市绿地土壤微生物特性研究[J].土壤通报,2007,38(6):1131-1135. |
HUANG M Y, YANG J F, WANG H F, et al.. Microbial properties in urban soils in coastal alkali-saline area of Tianjin [J]. Chin. J. Soil Sci., 2007, 38(6):1131-1135. | |
39 | 朱泓,王小敏,黄涛,等.NaCl 胁迫对滨梅根际细菌群落多样性及优势菌群的影响[J].南京林业大学学报(自然科学版),2017,40(4):49-54. |
ZHU H, WANG X M, HUANG T, et al.. Effect of NaCl stress on bacterial community diversity and core microbiome in rhizosphere and bulk soil of beach plum (Prunus maritima Marshall) [J]. J. Nanjing For. Univ. (Nat. Sci.), 2017, 40(4):49-54. | |
40 | YANG Y, SHAO T Y, LONG X H, et al.. Microbiome structure and function in rhizosphere of Jerusalem artichoke grown in saline land [J/OL].Sci. Total Environ., 2020, 724(168):138259 [2020-12-20]. . |
41 | 吉丽.盐碱胁迫下大豆根际微生物多样性分析[D].长春:吉林农业大学,2017. |
JI L. Diversity analysis of rhizosphere microorganisms in soybean under saline alkali stress [D]. Changchun: Jilin Agricultural University, 2017. | |
42 | XIA J B, REN J Y, ZHANG S Y, et al.. Forest and grass composite patterns improve the soil quality in the coastal saline-alkali land of the Yellow River Delta, China [J]. Geoderma, 2019, 349:25-35. |
43 | SHI W, TAKANO T, LIU S K. Isolation and characterization of novel bacterial taxa from extreme alkali-saline soil [J].World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol., 2012, 28 (5):2147-2157. |
44 | VALENZUELA-ENCINAS C, NERIA-GONZ LEZ I, NTARA-HERN NDEZ R J, et al.. Changes in the bacterial populations of the highly alkaline saline soil of the former lake Texcoco (Mexico) following flooding [J]. Extremophiles, 2009, 13(4):609-621. |
45 | VALENZUELA-ENCINAS C, NERIA-GONZ LEZ I, NTARA-HERN NDEZ R J, et al.. Phylogenetic analysis of the archaeal community in an alkaline-saline soil of the former lake Texcoco (Mexico) [J]. Extremophiles, 2008, 12(2):247-254. |
46 | 徐扬,张冠初,丁红,等.干旱与盐胁迫对花生根际土壤微生物群落结构的影响[J]].应用生态学报,2020,31(4):1305-1313. |
XU Y, ZHANG G C, DING H, et al.. Effects of salt and drought stresses on rhizosphere soil bacterial community structure and peanut yield [J]. Chin. J. Appl. Ecol., 2020, 31(4):1305-1313. | |
47 | 戴良香,康涛,慈敦伟,等.黄河三角洲盐碱地花生根层土壤菌群结构多样性研究[J].生态学报,2019,39(19):7169-7178. |
DAI L X, KANG T, CI D W, et al.. Comparison of the microbial community in the rhizosphere of peanuts between saline-alkali and non-saline soil at different soil depths and intercropping cultivation in the yellow river delta [J]. Acta Ecol. Sin., 2019, 39(19):7169-7178. | |
48 | 田平雅,沈聪,赵辉,等.银北盐碱区植物根际土壤酶活性及微生物群落特征[J].土壤学报,2020,57(1):217-226. |
TIAN P Y, SHEN C, ZHAO H, et al.. Enzyme activities and microbial communities in rhizospheres of plants in salinized soil in north Yinchuan, China [J]. Acta Pedolog. Sin., 2020, 57(1):217-226. | |
49 | 张美娟,王冰,黄升财,等.糠醛渣改良土壤增强苕子对盐碱土的适应性[J].农业工程学报,2020,36(6):115-121. |
ZHANG M J, WANG B, HUANG S C, et al.. Enhancing the adaptation of Vicia villosa Roth to salinity-alkalinity soils improved using furfural residues [J]. Trans. Chin. Soc. Agric. Eng., 2020, 36(6):115-121. | |
50 | 许来鹏,万鲜花,孙向丽,等.畜禽粪肥和秸秆还田对玉米根际微生物群落结构的影响[J].生物技术通报,2020,36(9):137-146. |
XU L P, WAN X H, SUN X L, et al.. Effects of livestock manure and straw returning to field on microbial community structure around maize rhizosphere [J]. Biotechnol. Bull., 2020, 36(9):137-146. | |
51 | BAI Y C, MEI L J, ZUO W G, et al.. Response of bacterial communities in coastal mudflat saline soil to sewage sludge amendment [J]. Appl. Soil Ecol., 2019, 144:107-111. |
52 | 俞冰倩.我国不同盐碱土生态系统土壤微生物群落多样性研究[D].江苏镇江:江苏大学,2019. |
YU B Q. Research on the diversity of microbial community in different saline-alkaline soil ecosystems in China [D]. Jiangsu Zhenjiang: Jiangsu University, 2019. |
[1] | Yu SU, Shaoli HUANG. Effects of Bio-organic Fertilizer on Flue-cured Tobacco Photosynthetic Characteristics and Rhizosphere Soil Microorganism [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2022, 24(1): 164-171. |
[2] | LIU Li, LIU Jing. Extension Mode and Effect Evaluation of Organic Fertilizer Substituting Chemical Fertilizer Technology#br# [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2021, 23(6): 13-22. |
[3] | YI Miao1,2§, WANG Jianguo2§, YIN Jin1, GUO Feng2, ZHANG Jialei2, TANG Zhaohui2, LI Xinguo2,3*, WAN Shubo2,3*. Impact of Nitrogen and Calcium Application on Growth and Physiological Characteristics of Peanut in Flowering Stage [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2021, 23(4): 164-172. |
[4] | WANG Siji, GUO Yanchun, ZENG Lusheng, SUN Xianmin, CHU Qinggang, WANG Sheng. Effects of Suaeda Planting Rate on Soil Enzyme Activity and Aggregation of Coastal Saline Alkali Land [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2021, 23(12): 179-185. |
[5] | TANG Li, XIE Yong, RONG Xiangmin*, YANG Wei, HUANG Jiayi, HE Shifu, ZHANG Lian. Effects of Different Ratios of Inorganic-N Substituted by Manure on Rice Yield, Nitrogen Absorption and Nitrogen Loss Risk [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2020, 22(9): 132-142. |
[6] | PU Quanming1, YANG Peng1*, DENG Yuchuan2, XIANG Chengyong1, LIN Bangmin1, LIU Lisha1, SHI Songmei3, HE Zemin1, YONG Lei1. Effects of Different Fertilization Methods on Soil Enzyme Activity, Soil Nutrients and Quality of Spring Cabbage [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2020, 22(7): 130-139. |
[7] | YANG Chengcui1, XU Zhaoli2, SHI Puyou1, JIA Meng1, BAI Yuxiang1, ZHU Xuanquan1, CHENG Yadong1, YANG Huanwen1, WANG Ge1*. Effects of Nitrogen Fertilizer Application on Nutrient Accumulation, Yield and Quality of Flue-cured Tobacco [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2020, 22(6): 176-185. |
[8] | SU Di, BAO Enyu, WANG Jin. Microbiome Composition in Rhizosphere and bulk Soil of Calciphilous Plant Primulina tabacum [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2020, 22(10): 149-156. |
[9] | CHEN Xiuwen, CHEN Jibao, CAI Debao, ZHANG Mengya, ZHANG Jun*. Influences of Calcium Fertilizer on Jufeng Grape Yield and Quality [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2019, 21(8): 140-146. |
[10] | ZHANG Jie1,2, MA Yajun1, HE Zhibin1, GAO Fangfang1, ZHANG Shaohua1, WANG Chaoran1, ZHAO Danchen1. Application of Microbial Fertilizer Instead of Fertilizer in Apple Planting [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2019, 21(7): 128-135. |
[11] | GU Meiying1§, YANG Rong1§, XU Wanli2*, TANG Guangmu2, ZHANG Zhidong1, ZHANG Yunshu2, FENG Lei2, WANG Ning1, ZHAN Faqiang1. Effects of Cotton Stalk Biochar Combined with Bio-organic Fertilizer on Rhizosphere Soil Micro-ecology and Cotton Growth of Continuous Cropping Cotton [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2019, 21(10): 47-57. |
[12] | HE Chen, ZHENG Guiping*, ZHAO Haicheng, CHEN Liqiang, LI Hongyu, LV Yandong. Influence of Increasing Humic Acid and Reducing Chemical Fertilizer on Rice Quality in Saline-alkali Soil [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2018, 20(9): 106-112. |
[13] | HUANG Mingyue, NIU Dexin, WANG Lizhi, LOU Yanan, LI Yanhua,YANG Shengnan, ZHANG Hongying, CUI Hong*. Effects of Organic Fertilizer Application on the Biosynthesis of Plastid Pigment in Flue-cured Tobacco [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2018, 20(4): 29-35. |
[14] | LI Diqin1, GONG Zhanwu1, LI Yuhui2, LIU Guanghui2*, CHEN Yifan1, . Effects of Compound Bio-organic Fertilizer on Flue-cured Tobacco Photosynthetic Physiological Characters & Soil Microbes [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2017, 19(9): 109-116. |
[15] | JIANG Ping§, CHENG Weihua§, LING Yajun, XIA Xujing, XIA Lining*. Detection and Analysis on β-lactam Enzyme and 16S rRNA Methylase Genes in Swine Resistance E. coli Isolated from Different Areas of Xinjiang in Spring and Autumn [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2017, 19(5): 35-41. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||