Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology ›› 2022, Vol. 24 ›› Issue (9): 12-23.DOI: 10.13304/j.nykjdb.2021.0432
• AGRICULTURAL INNOVATION FORUM • Previous Articles Next Articles
Zhaohui ZHANG(), Yifan JI, Zejun HE()
Received:
2021-05-22
Accepted:
2021-12-09
Online:
2022-09-15
Published:
2022-10-11
Contact:
Zejun HE
通讯作者:
何泽军
作者简介:
张朝辉 E-mail:zhang_puhc@163.com;
基金资助:
CLC Number:
Zhaohui ZHANG, Yifan JI, Zejun HE. Evolution in the Spatio-temporal Pattern on Animal Husbandry Green Development Competitiveness in China[J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2022, 24(9): 12-23.
张朝辉, 姬一帆, 何泽军. 中国省域畜牧业绿色发展竞争力时空演变特征[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2022, 24(9): 12-23.
一级指标 Level 1 index | 二级指标 Level 2 index | 三级指标 Level 3 index | 指标解释 Index to explain | 指标含义 Index meaning | 性质 Nature | 权重 Weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
A1:绿色投入 Green investment (0.215) | B1:资源节约 Saving resources (0.215) | C1:养殖用工数量 Number of farming workers/d | 每头生猪用工工时 Labor time per pig | 劳动力节约状况 Labor saving situation | - | 0.264 |
C2:饲料转化率 Feed conversion | 精饲料重量/生猪增重量 Feed weight/pigs gain weight | 饲料资源节约状况 Economy of feed resources | + | 0.416 | ||
C3:资产利用率 Asset utilization/% | 生猪出栏数量/期初数量(可用上期末数代替) Number of pigs produced/number at the beginning of the period (could be replaced by the amount at the end of the previous period) | 畜牧业集约生产能力 Intensive production capacity in animal husbandry | + | 0.320 | ||
B2:环境友好 Environment friendly (0.227) | C4:化学需氧量排放总量 Total chemical oxygen demand emissions | 粪便排放总量×化学需氧量排放系数 Total fecal discharge ×COD discharge coefficient | 畜牧业水体污染物减排状况 Emission reduction of pollutants in animal husbandry water | - | 0.180 | |
C5:氮磷排放总量 Total nitrogen and phosphorus emissions | 粪便排放总量×氮磷排放系数 Total fecal discharge × nitrogen and phosphorus emission coefficient | 畜牧业大气、固体污染物减排状况 Emission reduction of air and solid pollutants in animal husbandry | - | 0.200 | ||
C6:碳排放总量 Total carbon emissions | 畜禽饲养量×养殖过程碳当量排放系数 Quantity of livestock × carbon emission coefficient | 畜牧业大气污染物减排状况 Emission reduction of air pollutants in production | - | 0.106 | ||
C7:环境污染治理投资 Investment in environmental pollution control | 环境污染治理投资/平减指数 Investment in environmental pollution control/ deflator | 畜牧业环境治理强度 Intensity of environmental governance | + | 0.514 |
Table 1 Animal husbandry green development competitiveness evaluation index system index
一级指标 Level 1 index | 二级指标 Level 2 index | 三级指标 Level 3 index | 指标解释 Index to explain | 指标含义 Index meaning | 性质 Nature | 权重 Weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
A1:绿色投入 Green investment (0.215) | B1:资源节约 Saving resources (0.215) | C1:养殖用工数量 Number of farming workers/d | 每头生猪用工工时 Labor time per pig | 劳动力节约状况 Labor saving situation | - | 0.264 |
C2:饲料转化率 Feed conversion | 精饲料重量/生猪增重量 Feed weight/pigs gain weight | 饲料资源节约状况 Economy of feed resources | + | 0.416 | ||
C3:资产利用率 Asset utilization/% | 生猪出栏数量/期初数量(可用上期末数代替) Number of pigs produced/number at the beginning of the period (could be replaced by the amount at the end of the previous period) | 畜牧业集约生产能力 Intensive production capacity in animal husbandry | + | 0.320 | ||
B2:环境友好 Environment friendly (0.227) | C4:化学需氧量排放总量 Total chemical oxygen demand emissions | 粪便排放总量×化学需氧量排放系数 Total fecal discharge ×COD discharge coefficient | 畜牧业水体污染物减排状况 Emission reduction of pollutants in animal husbandry water | - | 0.180 | |
C5:氮磷排放总量 Total nitrogen and phosphorus emissions | 粪便排放总量×氮磷排放系数 Total fecal discharge × nitrogen and phosphorus emission coefficient | 畜牧业大气、固体污染物减排状况 Emission reduction of air and solid pollutants in animal husbandry | - | 0.200 | ||
C6:碳排放总量 Total carbon emissions | 畜禽饲养量×养殖过程碳当量排放系数 Quantity of livestock × carbon emission coefficient | 畜牧业大气污染物减排状况 Emission reduction of air pollutants in production | - | 0.106 | ||
C7:环境污染治理投资 Investment in environmental pollution control | 环境污染治理投资/平减指数 Investment in environmental pollution control/ deflator | 畜牧业环境治理强度 Intensity of environmental governance | + | 0.514 |
一级指标 Level 1 index | 二级指标 Level 2 index | 三级指标 Level 3 index | 指标解释 Index to explain | 指标含义 Index meaning | 性质 Nature | 权重 Weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
A2:绿色产出 Green output(0.785) | B3:产品安全 Product safety (0.388) | C8:规模化饲养率 Scale feeding rate | 生猪规模化养殖户数量/养殖户总量 Number of pig large-scale farmers/total number of pig farmers | 畜牧业安全养殖状况 Safety of animal husbandry | + | 0.425 |
C9:防疫费用率 Epidemic prevention cost rate | 生猪防疫费用/生产成本 Swine epidemic prevention cost/production cost | 养殖过程疫病防治状况 Condition of disease control in breeding process | + | 0.214 | ||
C10:绿色食品认证量 Number of green food certifications | 当年绿色食品认证数量 Number of green food certifications that year | 畜产品质量安全状况 Quality and safety status of livestock products | + | 0.361 | ||
B4:产出高效 Output efficiency(0.170) | C11:畜产品人均占有量 Quantity per capita of livestock products | 畜产品产量/总人口数 Production of livestock products/total population | 畜产品产出量状况 Output of livestock products | + | 0.250 | |
C12:畜牧业产值占农业产值比重 Proportion of of the value in agricultural production value | 畜牧业产值/农业总产值 Animal husbandry output value/agricultural output value | 畜牧业产值地位状况 Status of animal husbandry output value | + | 0.248 | ||
C13:成本利润率 Cost margin | 利润总额/成本费用总额 Total profit/total cost/total expense | 畜牧业经营成果发展状况 Status of the industy management performence | + | 0.501 |
Table 1 Animal husbandry green development competitiveness evaluation index system index
一级指标 Level 1 index | 二级指标 Level 2 index | 三级指标 Level 3 index | 指标解释 Index to explain | 指标含义 Index meaning | 性质 Nature | 权重 Weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
A2:绿色产出 Green output(0.785) | B3:产品安全 Product safety (0.388) | C8:规模化饲养率 Scale feeding rate | 生猪规模化养殖户数量/养殖户总量 Number of pig large-scale farmers/total number of pig farmers | 畜牧业安全养殖状况 Safety of animal husbandry | + | 0.425 |
C9:防疫费用率 Epidemic prevention cost rate | 生猪防疫费用/生产成本 Swine epidemic prevention cost/production cost | 养殖过程疫病防治状况 Condition of disease control in breeding process | + | 0.214 | ||
C10:绿色食品认证量 Number of green food certifications | 当年绿色食品认证数量 Number of green food certifications that year | 畜产品质量安全状况 Quality and safety status of livestock products | + | 0.361 | ||
B4:产出高效 Output efficiency(0.170) | C11:畜产品人均占有量 Quantity per capita of livestock products | 畜产品产量/总人口数 Production of livestock products/total population | 畜产品产出量状况 Output of livestock products | + | 0.250 | |
C12:畜牧业产值占农业产值比重 Proportion of of the value in agricultural production value | 畜牧业产值/农业总产值 Animal husbandry output value/agricultural output value | 畜牧业产值地位状况 Status of animal husbandry output value | + | 0.248 | ||
C13:成本利润率 Cost margin | 利润总额/成本费用总额 Total profit/total cost/total expense | 畜牧业经营成果发展状况 Status of the industy management performence | + | 0.501 |
地区 Region | 2009 | 2012 | 2016 | 2019 | 均值 Mean | 地区 Region | 2009 | 2012 | 2016 | 2019 | 均值 Mean |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
北京 Beijing | 0.601 | 0.542 | 0.607 | 0.493 | 0.549 | 河南 Henan | 0.337 | 0.238 | 0.297 | 0.411 | 0.303 |
天津 Tianjin | 0.537 | 0.563 | 0.661 | 0.538 | 0.553 | 湖北 Hubei | 0.326 | 0.290 | 0.395 | 0.363 | 0.354 |
河北 Hebei | 0.364 | 0.455 | 0.364 | 0.454 | 0.391 | 湖南 Hunan | 0.341 | 0.283 | 0.307 | 0.376 | 0.319 |
山西 Shanxi | 0.242 | 0.309 | 0.444 | 0.541 | 0.381 | 广东 Guangdong | 0.363 | 0.369 | 0.341 | 0.352 | 0.347 |
内蒙古 Inner Mongolia | 0.451 | 0.418 | 0.453 | 0.491 | 0.453 | 广西 Guangxi | 0.282 | 0.263 | 0.311 | 0.331 | 0.287 |
辽宁 Liaoning | 0.446 | 0.328 | 0.381 | 0.387 | 0.386 | 海南 Hainan | 0.370 | 0.396 | 0.422 | 0.389 | 0.394 |
吉林 Jilin | 0.387 | 0.443 | 0.384 | 0.383 | 0.400 | 重庆 Chongqing | 0.250 | 0.223 | 0.354 | 0.475 | 0.326 |
黑龙江 Heilongjiang | 0.392 | 0.458 | 0.406 | 0.421 | 0.419 | 四川 Sichuan | 0.278 | 0.253 | 0.253 | 0.339 | 0.272 |
上海 Shanghai | 0.387 | 0.332 | 0.423 | 0.431 | 0.395 | 贵州 Guizhou | 0.351 | 0.235 | 0.212 | 0.261 | 0.267 |
江苏 Jiangsu | 0.426 | 0.304 | 0.426 | 0.470 | 0.400 | 云南 Yunnan | 0.348 | 0.294 | 0.372 | 0.307 | 0.312 |
浙江 Zhejiang | 0.425 | 0.382 | 0.419 | 0.453 | 0.426 | 陕西 Shaanxi | 0.341 | 0.317 | 0.416 | 0.410 | 0.350 |
安徽 Anhui | 0.352 | 0.372 | 0.421 | 0.477 | 0.406 | 甘肃 Gansu | 0.228 | 0.245 | 0.251 | 0.271 | 0.259 |
福建 Fujian | 0.325 | 0.396 | 0.412 | 0.449 | 0.396 | 青海 Qinghai | 0.300 | 0.317 | 0.412 | 0.284 | 0.345 |
江西 Jiangxi | 0.304 | 0.299 | 0.323 | 0.358 | 0.321 | 宁夏 Ningxia | 0.277 | 0.473 | 0.452 | 0.490 | 0.423 |
山东 Shandong | 0.347 | 0.293 | 0.421 | 0.353 | 0.354 | 新疆 Xinjiang | 0.464 | 0.495 | 0.481 | 0.486 | 0.486 |
全国平均 Average | 0.389 | 0.367 | 0.415 | 0.425 | 0.396 |
Table 2 Evaluation results of green development competitiveness of animal husbandry from 2009 to2019
地区 Region | 2009 | 2012 | 2016 | 2019 | 均值 Mean | 地区 Region | 2009 | 2012 | 2016 | 2019 | 均值 Mean |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
北京 Beijing | 0.601 | 0.542 | 0.607 | 0.493 | 0.549 | 河南 Henan | 0.337 | 0.238 | 0.297 | 0.411 | 0.303 |
天津 Tianjin | 0.537 | 0.563 | 0.661 | 0.538 | 0.553 | 湖北 Hubei | 0.326 | 0.290 | 0.395 | 0.363 | 0.354 |
河北 Hebei | 0.364 | 0.455 | 0.364 | 0.454 | 0.391 | 湖南 Hunan | 0.341 | 0.283 | 0.307 | 0.376 | 0.319 |
山西 Shanxi | 0.242 | 0.309 | 0.444 | 0.541 | 0.381 | 广东 Guangdong | 0.363 | 0.369 | 0.341 | 0.352 | 0.347 |
内蒙古 Inner Mongolia | 0.451 | 0.418 | 0.453 | 0.491 | 0.453 | 广西 Guangxi | 0.282 | 0.263 | 0.311 | 0.331 | 0.287 |
辽宁 Liaoning | 0.446 | 0.328 | 0.381 | 0.387 | 0.386 | 海南 Hainan | 0.370 | 0.396 | 0.422 | 0.389 | 0.394 |
吉林 Jilin | 0.387 | 0.443 | 0.384 | 0.383 | 0.400 | 重庆 Chongqing | 0.250 | 0.223 | 0.354 | 0.475 | 0.326 |
黑龙江 Heilongjiang | 0.392 | 0.458 | 0.406 | 0.421 | 0.419 | 四川 Sichuan | 0.278 | 0.253 | 0.253 | 0.339 | 0.272 |
上海 Shanghai | 0.387 | 0.332 | 0.423 | 0.431 | 0.395 | 贵州 Guizhou | 0.351 | 0.235 | 0.212 | 0.261 | 0.267 |
江苏 Jiangsu | 0.426 | 0.304 | 0.426 | 0.470 | 0.400 | 云南 Yunnan | 0.348 | 0.294 | 0.372 | 0.307 | 0.312 |
浙江 Zhejiang | 0.425 | 0.382 | 0.419 | 0.453 | 0.426 | 陕西 Shaanxi | 0.341 | 0.317 | 0.416 | 0.410 | 0.350 |
安徽 Anhui | 0.352 | 0.372 | 0.421 | 0.477 | 0.406 | 甘肃 Gansu | 0.228 | 0.245 | 0.251 | 0.271 | 0.259 |
福建 Fujian | 0.325 | 0.396 | 0.412 | 0.449 | 0.396 | 青海 Qinghai | 0.300 | 0.317 | 0.412 | 0.284 | 0.345 |
江西 Jiangxi | 0.304 | 0.299 | 0.323 | 0.358 | 0.321 | 宁夏 Ningxia | 0.277 | 0.473 | 0.452 | 0.490 | 0.423 |
山东 Shandong | 0.347 | 0.293 | 0.421 | 0.353 | 0.354 | 新疆 Xinjiang | 0.464 | 0.495 | 0.481 | 0.486 | 0.486 |
全国平均 Average | 0.389 | 0.367 | 0.415 | 0.425 | 0.396 |
年份 Year | 较高 Higher | 高 High | 低 Low | 较低 Lower |
---|---|---|---|---|
2009 | 北京、天津Beijing,Tianjin | 新疆、内蒙古、 吉林、江苏、黑龙江 Xinjiang, Inner Mongolia, Jilin, Jiangsu, Heilongjiang | 浙江、吉林、上海、海南、河北、广东、安徽、贵州、云南、山东、湖南、陕西、河南、湖北、福建 Zhejiang, Jilin, Shanghai, Hainan, Hebei,Guangdong, Anhui, Guizhou, Yunnan, Shandong, Hunan, Shaanxi, Henan, Hubei, Fujian | 江西、青海、广西、四川、宁夏、重庆、山西、甘肃 Jiangxi, Qinghai, Guangxi, Sichuan, Ningxia, Chongqing, Shanxi, Gansu |
2012 | 北京、天津、新疆 Beijing, Tianjin, Xinjiang | 宁夏、黑龙江、 河北、吉林、内蒙古 Ningxia, Heilongjiang, Hebei, Jilin, Inner Mongolia | 福建、海南、浙江、安徽、广东、上海、辽宁、陕西、青海、山西、江苏、江西、云南 Fujian, Hainan, Zhejiang, Anhui, Guangdong, Shanghai, Liaoning, Shaanxi, Qinghai, Shanxi, Jiangsu, Jiangxi, Yunnan | 山东、湖北、湖南、广西、四川、甘肃、河南、贵州、重庆 Shandong, Hubei, Hunan, Guangxi, Sichuan, Gansu, Henan, Guizhou, Chongqing |
2016 | 北京、天津 Beijing, Tianjin | 新疆、内蒙古、宁夏 Xinjiang, Inner Mongolia, Ningxia | 山西、江苏、上海、海南、安徽、山东、浙江、陕西、福建、青海、黑龙江、湖北、吉林、辽宁、云南、河北、重庆 Shanxi, Jiangsu, Shanghai, Hainan, Anhui, Shandong, Zhejiang, Shaanxi, Fujian, Qinghai, Heilongjiang, Hubei, Jilin, Liaoning, Yunnan, Hebei, Chongqing | 广东、江西、广西、湖南、河南、四川、甘肃、贵州 Guangdong, Jiangxi, Guangxi, Hunan, Henan, Sichuan, Gansu, Guizhou |
2019 | 北京、天津、山西 Beijing, Tianjin, Shanxi | 内蒙古、宁夏、 新疆、安徽、重庆、 江苏、河北 Inner Mongolia, Ningxia, Xinjiang, Anhui, Chongqing, Jiangsu, Hebei | 浙江、福建、上海、黑龙江、河南、陕西、海南、辽宁、 吉林、湖南、湖北、江西、山东 Zhejiang, Fujian, Shanghai, Heilongjiang, Henan, Shaanxi, Hainan, Liaoning, Jilin, Hunan, Hubei, Jiangxi, Shandong | 广东、四川、广西、云南、青海、甘肃、贵州 Guangdong, Sichuan, Guangxi, Yunnan, Qinghai, Gansu, Guizhou |
Table 3 Cluster results of green development competitiveness of animal husbandry from 2009 to 2019
年份 Year | 较高 Higher | 高 High | 低 Low | 较低 Lower |
---|---|---|---|---|
2009 | 北京、天津Beijing,Tianjin | 新疆、内蒙古、 吉林、江苏、黑龙江 Xinjiang, Inner Mongolia, Jilin, Jiangsu, Heilongjiang | 浙江、吉林、上海、海南、河北、广东、安徽、贵州、云南、山东、湖南、陕西、河南、湖北、福建 Zhejiang, Jilin, Shanghai, Hainan, Hebei,Guangdong, Anhui, Guizhou, Yunnan, Shandong, Hunan, Shaanxi, Henan, Hubei, Fujian | 江西、青海、广西、四川、宁夏、重庆、山西、甘肃 Jiangxi, Qinghai, Guangxi, Sichuan, Ningxia, Chongqing, Shanxi, Gansu |
2012 | 北京、天津、新疆 Beijing, Tianjin, Xinjiang | 宁夏、黑龙江、 河北、吉林、内蒙古 Ningxia, Heilongjiang, Hebei, Jilin, Inner Mongolia | 福建、海南、浙江、安徽、广东、上海、辽宁、陕西、青海、山西、江苏、江西、云南 Fujian, Hainan, Zhejiang, Anhui, Guangdong, Shanghai, Liaoning, Shaanxi, Qinghai, Shanxi, Jiangsu, Jiangxi, Yunnan | 山东、湖北、湖南、广西、四川、甘肃、河南、贵州、重庆 Shandong, Hubei, Hunan, Guangxi, Sichuan, Gansu, Henan, Guizhou, Chongqing |
2016 | 北京、天津 Beijing, Tianjin | 新疆、内蒙古、宁夏 Xinjiang, Inner Mongolia, Ningxia | 山西、江苏、上海、海南、安徽、山东、浙江、陕西、福建、青海、黑龙江、湖北、吉林、辽宁、云南、河北、重庆 Shanxi, Jiangsu, Shanghai, Hainan, Anhui, Shandong, Zhejiang, Shaanxi, Fujian, Qinghai, Heilongjiang, Hubei, Jilin, Liaoning, Yunnan, Hebei, Chongqing | 广东、江西、广西、湖南、河南、四川、甘肃、贵州 Guangdong, Jiangxi, Guangxi, Hunan, Henan, Sichuan, Gansu, Guizhou |
2019 | 北京、天津、山西 Beijing, Tianjin, Shanxi | 内蒙古、宁夏、 新疆、安徽、重庆、 江苏、河北 Inner Mongolia, Ningxia, Xinjiang, Anhui, Chongqing, Jiangsu, Hebei | 浙江、福建、上海、黑龙江、河南、陕西、海南、辽宁、 吉林、湖南、湖北、江西、山东 Zhejiang, Fujian, Shanghai, Heilongjiang, Henan, Shaanxi, Hainan, Liaoning, Jilin, Hunan, Hubei, Jiangxi, Shandong | 广东、四川、广西、云南、青海、甘肃、贵州 Guangdong, Sichuan, Guangxi, Yunnan, Qinghai, Gansu, Guizhou |
地区 Region | 资源节约 Saving resources | 环境友好 Environment friendly | 产品安全 Product safety | 产出高效 Output efficiency | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2009 | 2019 | 增长Growth | 2009 | 2019 | 增长Growth | 2009 | 2019 | 增长Growth | 2009 | 2019 | 增长Growth | ||
东南 Southeast | 上海 Shanghai | 0.529 | 0.573 | 0.044 | 0.510 | 0.553 | 0.043 | 0.392 | 0.433 | 0.040 | 0.032 | 0.081 | 0.049 |
江苏 Jiangsu | 0.496 | 0.579 | 0.083 | 0.768 | 0.745 | -0.023 | 0.290 | 0.358 | 0.068 | 0.190 | 0.223 | 0.033 | |
浙江 Zhejiang | 0.539 | 0.782 | 0.243 | 0.695 | 0.684 | -0.011 | 0.292 | 0.243 | -0.049 | 0.223 | 0.207 | -0.016 | |
福建 Fujian | 0.452 | 0.787 | 0.335 | 0.496 | 0.480 | -0.016 | 0.254 | 0.328 | 0.074 | 0.094 | 0.256 | 0.162 | |
广东 Guangdong | 0.512 | 0.675 | 0.162 | 0.408 | 0.439 | 0.031 | 0.286 | 0.220 | -0.066 | 0.292 | 0.130 | -0.162 | |
广西 Guangxi | 0.360 | 0.316 | -0.045 | 0.396 | 0.386 | -0.010 | 0.191 | 0.340 | 0.149 | 0.238 | 0.256 | 0.018 | |
海南 Hainan | 0.443 | 0.663 | 0.220 | 0.439 | 0.438 | 0.000 | 0.405 | 0.310 | -0.095 | 0.106 | 0.157 | 0.050 | |
安徽 Anhui | 0.458 | 0.916 | 0.458 | 0.574 | 0.603 | 0.029 | 0.197 | 0.201 | 0.005 | 0.276 | 0.382 | 0.106 | |
江西 Jiangxi | 0.428 | 0.585 | 0.157 | 0.503 | 0.520 | 0.017 | 0.177 | 0.220 | 0.043 | 0.171 | 0.169 | -0.002 | |
东北 Northeast | 黑龙江 Heilongjiang | 0.280 | 0.599 | 0.319 | 0.370 | 0.357 | -0.013 | 0.393 | 0.280 | -0.113 | 0.561 | 0.605 | 0.044 |
吉林 Jilin | 0.438 | 0.516 | 0.079 | 0.455 | 0.387 | -0.068 | 0.382 | 0.239 | -0.143 | 0.591 | 0.563 | -0.028 | |
辽宁 Liaoning | 0.429 | 0.641 | 0.211 | 0.464 | 0.420 | -0.044 | 0.419 | 0.210 | -0.209 | 0.504 | 0.428 | -0.076 | |
内蒙古 Inner Mongolia | 0.423 | 0.453 | 0.030 | 0.461 | 0.507 | 0.045 | 0.317 | 0.388 | 0.071 | 0.778 | 0.753 | -0.025 | |
中部 Midland | 北京 Beijing | 0.818 | 0.690 | -0.128 | 0.819 | 0.839 | 0.020 | 0.510 | 0.382 | -0.128 | 0.244 | 0.033 | -0.211 |
天津 Tianjin | 0.587 | 0.611 | 0.024 | 0.509 | 0.492 | -0.017 | 0.584 | 0.674 | 0.090 | 0.404 | 0.195 | -0.208 | |
河北 Hebei | 0.281 | 0.503 | 0.222 | 0.601 | 0.608 | 0.007 | 0.111 | 0.227 | 0.116 | 0.734 | 0.704 | -0.030 | |
山东 Shandong | 0.451 | 0.509 | 0.058 | 0.524 | 0.508 | -0.016 | 0.225 | 0.225 | 0.000 | 0.258 | 0.243 | -0.015 | |
山西 Shanxi | 0.203 | 0.425 | 0.223 | 0.563 | 0.555 | -0.008 | 0.085 | 0.640 | 0.554 | 0.220 | 0.444 | 0.224 | |
河南 Henan | 0.145 | 0.400 | 0.255 | 0.428 | 0.489 | 0.061 | 0.248 | 0.313 | 0.064 | 0.661 | 0.546 | -0.115 | |
湖北 Hubei | 0.406 | 0.521 | 0.116 | 0.490 | 0.513 | 0.023 | 0.191 | 0.241 | 0.050 | 0.315 | 0.241 | -0.074 |
Table 4 Spatial evolution of secondary indicators of animal husbandry green development competitiveness in 2009 and 2019
地区 Region | 资源节约 Saving resources | 环境友好 Environment friendly | 产品安全 Product safety | 产出高效 Output efficiency | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2009 | 2019 | 增长Growth | 2009 | 2019 | 增长Growth | 2009 | 2019 | 增长Growth | 2009 | 2019 | 增长Growth | ||
东南 Southeast | 上海 Shanghai | 0.529 | 0.573 | 0.044 | 0.510 | 0.553 | 0.043 | 0.392 | 0.433 | 0.040 | 0.032 | 0.081 | 0.049 |
江苏 Jiangsu | 0.496 | 0.579 | 0.083 | 0.768 | 0.745 | -0.023 | 0.290 | 0.358 | 0.068 | 0.190 | 0.223 | 0.033 | |
浙江 Zhejiang | 0.539 | 0.782 | 0.243 | 0.695 | 0.684 | -0.011 | 0.292 | 0.243 | -0.049 | 0.223 | 0.207 | -0.016 | |
福建 Fujian | 0.452 | 0.787 | 0.335 | 0.496 | 0.480 | -0.016 | 0.254 | 0.328 | 0.074 | 0.094 | 0.256 | 0.162 | |
广东 Guangdong | 0.512 | 0.675 | 0.162 | 0.408 | 0.439 | 0.031 | 0.286 | 0.220 | -0.066 | 0.292 | 0.130 | -0.162 | |
广西 Guangxi | 0.360 | 0.316 | -0.045 | 0.396 | 0.386 | -0.010 | 0.191 | 0.340 | 0.149 | 0.238 | 0.256 | 0.018 | |
海南 Hainan | 0.443 | 0.663 | 0.220 | 0.439 | 0.438 | 0.000 | 0.405 | 0.310 | -0.095 | 0.106 | 0.157 | 0.050 | |
安徽 Anhui | 0.458 | 0.916 | 0.458 | 0.574 | 0.603 | 0.029 | 0.197 | 0.201 | 0.005 | 0.276 | 0.382 | 0.106 | |
江西 Jiangxi | 0.428 | 0.585 | 0.157 | 0.503 | 0.520 | 0.017 | 0.177 | 0.220 | 0.043 | 0.171 | 0.169 | -0.002 | |
东北 Northeast | 黑龙江 Heilongjiang | 0.280 | 0.599 | 0.319 | 0.370 | 0.357 | -0.013 | 0.393 | 0.280 | -0.113 | 0.561 | 0.605 | 0.044 |
吉林 Jilin | 0.438 | 0.516 | 0.079 | 0.455 | 0.387 | -0.068 | 0.382 | 0.239 | -0.143 | 0.591 | 0.563 | -0.028 | |
辽宁 Liaoning | 0.429 | 0.641 | 0.211 | 0.464 | 0.420 | -0.044 | 0.419 | 0.210 | -0.209 | 0.504 | 0.428 | -0.076 | |
内蒙古 Inner Mongolia | 0.423 | 0.453 | 0.030 | 0.461 | 0.507 | 0.045 | 0.317 | 0.388 | 0.071 | 0.778 | 0.753 | -0.025 | |
中部 Midland | 北京 Beijing | 0.818 | 0.690 | -0.128 | 0.819 | 0.839 | 0.020 | 0.510 | 0.382 | -0.128 | 0.244 | 0.033 | -0.211 |
天津 Tianjin | 0.587 | 0.611 | 0.024 | 0.509 | 0.492 | -0.017 | 0.584 | 0.674 | 0.090 | 0.404 | 0.195 | -0.208 | |
河北 Hebei | 0.281 | 0.503 | 0.222 | 0.601 | 0.608 | 0.007 | 0.111 | 0.227 | 0.116 | 0.734 | 0.704 | -0.030 | |
山东 Shandong | 0.451 | 0.509 | 0.058 | 0.524 | 0.508 | -0.016 | 0.225 | 0.225 | 0.000 | 0.258 | 0.243 | -0.015 | |
山西 Shanxi | 0.203 | 0.425 | 0.223 | 0.563 | 0.555 | -0.008 | 0.085 | 0.640 | 0.554 | 0.220 | 0.444 | 0.224 | |
河南 Henan | 0.145 | 0.400 | 0.255 | 0.428 | 0.489 | 0.061 | 0.248 | 0.313 | 0.064 | 0.661 | 0.546 | -0.115 | |
湖北 Hubei | 0.406 | 0.521 | 0.116 | 0.490 | 0.513 | 0.023 | 0.191 | 0.241 | 0.050 | 0.315 | 0.241 | -0.074 |
地区Region | 资源节约 Saving resources | 环境友好 Environment friendly | 产品安全 Product safety | 产出高效 Output efficiency | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2009 | 2019 | 增长Growth | 2009 | 2019 | 增长Growth | 2009 | 2019 | 增长Growth | 2009 | 2019 | 增长Growth | ||
湖南 Hunan | 0.409 | 0.725 | 0.316 | 0.359 | 0.348 | -0.011 | 0.305 | 0.253 | -0.052 | 0.314 | 0.253 | -0.061 | |
西南 Southwest | 重庆 Chongqing | 0.131 | 0.688 | 0.557 | 0.509 | 0.549 | 0.039 | 0.142 | 0.346 | 0.204 | 0.300 | 0.400 | 0.100 |
四川 Sichuan | 0.370 | 0.467 | 0.098 | 0.244 | 0.237 | -0.007 | 0.154 | 0.335 | 0.181 | 0.490 | 0.323 | -0.168 | |
贵州 Guizhou | 0.122 | 0.213 | 0.091 | 0.405 | 0.417 | 0.012 | 0.411 | 0.208 | -0.202 | 0.433 | 0.234 | -0.199 | |
云南 Yunnan | 0.423 | 0.273 | -0.150 | 0.246 | 0.226 | -0.020 | 0.324 | 0.328 | 0.004 | 0.445 | 0.410 | -0.034 | |
西北 Northwest | 陕西 Shaanxi | 0.186 | 0.483 | 0.297 | 0.549 | 0.562 | 0.013 | 0.228 | 0.262 | 0.034 | 0.517 | 0.453 | -0.064 |
甘肃 Gansu | 0.369 | 0.430 | 0.062 | 0.368 | 0.353 | -0.015 | 0.081 | 0.151 | 0.070 | 0.199 | 0.234 | 0.035 | |
青海 Qinghai | 0.439 | 0.242 | -0.197 | 0.346 | 0.334 | -0.012 | 0.181 | 0.200 | 0.018 | 0.333 | 0.462 | 0.129 | |
宁夏 Ningxia | 0.195 | 0.641 | 0.446 | 0.478 | 0.562 | 0.083 | 0.135 | 0.281 | 0.147 | 0.436 | 0.678 | 0.241 | |
新疆 Xinjiang | 0.507 | 0.566 | 0.060 | 0.590 | 0.609 | 0.019 | 0.294 | 0.350 | 0.056 | 0.628 | 0.529 | -0.099 |
Table 4 Spatial evolution of secondary indicators of animal husbandry green development competitiveness in 2009 and 2019
地区Region | 资源节约 Saving resources | 环境友好 Environment friendly | 产品安全 Product safety | 产出高效 Output efficiency | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2009 | 2019 | 增长Growth | 2009 | 2019 | 增长Growth | 2009 | 2019 | 增长Growth | 2009 | 2019 | 增长Growth | ||
湖南 Hunan | 0.409 | 0.725 | 0.316 | 0.359 | 0.348 | -0.011 | 0.305 | 0.253 | -0.052 | 0.314 | 0.253 | -0.061 | |
西南 Southwest | 重庆 Chongqing | 0.131 | 0.688 | 0.557 | 0.509 | 0.549 | 0.039 | 0.142 | 0.346 | 0.204 | 0.300 | 0.400 | 0.100 |
四川 Sichuan | 0.370 | 0.467 | 0.098 | 0.244 | 0.237 | -0.007 | 0.154 | 0.335 | 0.181 | 0.490 | 0.323 | -0.168 | |
贵州 Guizhou | 0.122 | 0.213 | 0.091 | 0.405 | 0.417 | 0.012 | 0.411 | 0.208 | -0.202 | 0.433 | 0.234 | -0.199 | |
云南 Yunnan | 0.423 | 0.273 | -0.150 | 0.246 | 0.226 | -0.020 | 0.324 | 0.328 | 0.004 | 0.445 | 0.410 | -0.034 | |
西北 Northwest | 陕西 Shaanxi | 0.186 | 0.483 | 0.297 | 0.549 | 0.562 | 0.013 | 0.228 | 0.262 | 0.034 | 0.517 | 0.453 | -0.064 |
甘肃 Gansu | 0.369 | 0.430 | 0.062 | 0.368 | 0.353 | -0.015 | 0.081 | 0.151 | 0.070 | 0.199 | 0.234 | 0.035 | |
青海 Qinghai | 0.439 | 0.242 | -0.197 | 0.346 | 0.334 | -0.012 | 0.181 | 0.200 | 0.018 | 0.333 | 0.462 | 0.129 | |
宁夏 Ningxia | 0.195 | 0.641 | 0.446 | 0.478 | 0.562 | 0.083 | 0.135 | 0.281 | 0.147 | 0.436 | 0.678 | 0.241 | |
新疆 Xinjiang | 0.507 | 0.566 | 0.060 | 0.590 | 0.609 | 0.019 | 0.294 | 0.350 | 0.056 | 0.628 | 0.529 | -0.099 |
1 | 王明利.改革开放四十年我国畜牧业发展:成就、经验及未来趋势[J].农业经济问题,2018(8):60-70. |
WANG M L. China’s livestock industry development: achievements, experiences and future trends [J]. Issu. Agric. Econ., 2018(8):60-70. | |
2 | 许荣,肖海峰.草原畜牧业适度规模经营:规模报酬、产出水平与生产成本[J].中国农业大学学报,2019,24(9):218-231. |
XU R, XIAO H F. Moderate scale operation of grassland animal husbandry: scale reward, output level and production cost [J]. J. China Agric. Univ., 2019,24(9):218-231. | |
3 | 魏琦,张斌,金书秦.中国农业绿色发展指数构建及区域比较研究[J].农业经济问题,2018(11):11-20. |
WEI Q, ZHANG B, JIN S Q. A study on construction and regional comparison of agricultural green development index in China [J]. Issu. Agric. Econ., 2018(11):11-20. | |
4 | 洪小瑛.关于绿色竞争力的几点理论思考[J].广西社会科学,2002(3):92-95. |
HONG X Y. Some theoretical considerations on green competitiveness [J]. Soc. Sci. Guangxi, 2002(3):92-95. | |
5 | 杨小川,陈娴.试论我国猪肉产业国际竞争力问题[J].农村经济,2008(5):57-60. |
YANG X C, CHEN X. On the international iompetitiveness of China's pork industry [J]. Rural Econ.,2008(5):57-60. | |
6 | 蒋和平,黄德林.中国农业现代化发展水平的定量综合评价[J].农业现代化研究,2006(2):87-91. |
JIANG H P, HUANG D L. Econometrics evaluation of China agricultural modernization [J]. Res. Agric. Modern, 2006(2):87-91. | |
7 | 辛岭,蒋和平.中国农业现代化发展水平评价指标体系的构建和测算[J].农业现代化研究,2010,31(6):646-650. |
XIN L, JIANG H P. Setting up evaluation index system and calculation development level of China agricultural modernization [J]. Res. Agric. Modern, 2010,31(6):646-650. | |
8 | ZHOU Q Y, LUO J J, LIU Q C. Agricultural modernization index system and evaluation method research [J]. Key Eng. Materials, 2010, 439-440: 842-847. |
9 | 王国刚,杨春,王明利.中国现代畜牧业发展水平测度及其地域分异特征[J].华中农业大学学报(社会科学版),2018(6):7-13,150-151. |
WANG G G, YANG C, WANG M L. Measurement and spatial distribution of the development level of animal husbandry’s modernization in China [J]. J. Huazhong Agric. Univ. (Soc. Sci. ),2018(6):7-13,150-151. | |
10 | 孙炜琳,王瑞波,姜茜,等.农业绿色发展的内涵与评价研究[J].中国农业资源与区划,2019,40(4):14-21. |
SUN W L, WANG R B, JIANG Q, et al.. Study on connotation and evaluation of the agricultural green development [J]. Chin. J. Agric. Res. Region. Plan., 2019,40(4):14-21. | |
11 | 金赛美.中国省际农业绿色发展水平及区域差异评价[J].求索,2019(2):89-95. |
JIN S M. Evaluation on the level of green agricultural development and regional differences among provinces in China [J].Seeker, 2019(2):89-95. | |
12 | 郭蓓,李婷君,魏东雄,等.北京农业绿色发展评价指标体系构建及推进方向[J].农业展望,2018,14(2):39-44. |
GUO B, LI T J, WEI D X, et al.. Evaluation index system construction and propelling direction of agricultural green development in Beijing [J]. Agric. Outlook, 2018,14(2):39-44. | |
13 | 张乃明,张丽,赵宏,等.农业绿色发展评价指标体系的构建与应用[J].生态经济,2018,34(11):21-24, 46. |
ZHANG N M, ZHANG L, ZHAO H, et al.. Construction and application of evaluation index system for agricultural green development [J]. Ecol. Econ., 2018,34(11):21-24, 46. | |
14 | 焦翔.我国农业绿色发展现状、问题及对策[J].农业经济,2019(7):3-5. |
JIAO X. Present situation, problems and countermeasures of agricultural green development in China [J]. Agric. Econ., 2019(7):3-5. | |
15 | 金书秦,牛坤玉,韩冬梅.农业绿色发展路径及其“十四五”取向[J].改革,2020(2):30-39. |
JIN S Q, NIU K Y, HAN D M. The path of agricultural green development and its orientation in the 14th Five-Year plan period [J]. Reform, 2020(2):30-39. | |
16 | 陆文聪,张宁,西爱琴,等.浙江省现代畜牧业发展水平的基本判断及综合评价[J].华南农业大学学报(社会科学版),2007(1):10-16. |
LU W C, ZHANG N, XI A Q, et al.. Synthesized judgement and assessment of modern livestock developing in Zhejiang province [J]. J. South China Agric.Univ. (Soc. Sci. ),2007(1):10-16. | |
17 | 戴健,刘晓媛,苏武峥,等.现代畜牧业指标体系研究[J].农业技术经济,2007(2):48-53. |
DAI J, LIU X Y, SU W Z, et al.. Study on index system of modern animal husbandry [J]. J. Agrotech. Econ.,2007(2):48-53. | |
18 | 王勇,李海英,俞海.中国省域绿色发展的空间格局及其演变特征[J].中国人口·资源与环境,2018,28(10):96-104. |
WANG Y, LI H Y, YU H. Analysis of spatial pattern and evolution characteristics of provincial green development in China [J]. China Population, Resour. Environ., 2018,28(10):96-104. | |
19 | 高红贵,赵路.长江经济带产业绿色发展水平测度及空间差异分析[J].科技进步与对策,2019,36(12):46-53. |
GAO H G, ZHAO L. Green development level measurement and spatial difference analysis of Yangtze River Economic Belt [J]. Sci. Technol. Prog. Policy, 2019,36(12):46-53. | |
20 | 张藤丽,焉莉,韦大明.基于全国耕地消纳的畜禽粪便特征分布与环境承载力预警分析[J].中国生态农业学报,2020,28(5):745-755. |
ZHANG T L, YAN L, WEI D M. Characteristic distribution of livestock manure and warning analysis of environmental Carrying capacity based on the consumption of cultivated land in China [J]. Chin. J. Eco-Agric., 2020,28(5):745-755. | |
21 | 姚成胜,钱双双,李政通,等.中国省际畜牧业碳排放测度及时空演化机制[J].资源科学,2017,39(4):698-712. |
YAO C S, QIAN S S, LI Z T, et al.. Provincial animal husbandry carbon emissions in China and temporal-spatial evolution mechanism [J]. Resour. Sci., 2017,39(4):698-712. | |
22 | 崔元锋,严立冬,陆金铸,等.中国绿色农业发展水平综合评价体系研究[J].农业经济问题,2009,30(6):29-33. |
CUI Y F, YAN L D, LU J Z, et al.. Study on comprehensive evaluation system of development level of green agriculture in China [J]. Issu. Agric. Econ., 2009,30(6):29-33. | |
23 | 张艳荣,王玉新.基于模糊综合评价法的凉州区畜牧业效益综合评价[J].湖南农业科学,2009(1):127-130. |
ZHANG Y R, WANG Y X. Evaluation of animal Husbandry benefit of liangzhou district based on fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method [J]. Hunan Agric. Sci., 2009(1):127-130. | |
24 | 姜法竹,张涛,王兆君.效益型畜牧业发展评价研究[J].西北农林科技大学学报(社会科学版),2008(5):42-47. |
JIANG F Z, ZHANG T, WANG Z J. Study on assessment of the development of efficiency-benefit type of animal husbandry [J]. J. Northwest A&F Univ. (Soc. Sci.), 2008(5):42-47. | |
25 | 王颖,喻阳华.中国农业可持续发展水平多尺度时空演变特征[J].中国农业科技导报,2021,23(3):8-17. |
WANG Y, YU Y H. Evolution in the spatio-temporal pattern of agricultural sustainable development level in China based on multi-scales [J]. J. Agric. Sci. Technol., 2021,23(3):8-17. | |
26 | 方大春,马为彪.中国省际高质量发展的测度及时空特征[J].区域经济评论,2019(2):61-70. |
FANG D C, MA W B. Study on the measurement of China’s inter-provincial high-quality development and its spatial-temporal characteristics [J]. Region. Econ. Rev.,2019(2):61-70. | |
27 | 岳冬冬,吴反修,方海,等.中国海水养殖业绿色发展评价研究[J].中国农业科技导报,2021,23(6):1-12. |
YUE D D, WU F X, FANG H, et al.. Green development evaluation of mariculture in China [J]. J. Agric. Sci. Technol.,2021,23(6):1-12. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||