Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology ›› 2023, Vol. 25 ›› Issue (2): 38-47.DOI: 10.13304/j.nykjdb.2022.0550
• BIOTECHNOLOGY & LIFE SCIENCE • Previous Articles Next Articles
Shengwei GUO1(), Siwen BIAN1, Jianwen DING2, Xiaochen ZHANG2, Xing YANG2, Jin DU1(
), Chunyang XIANG1(
)
Received:
2022-07-04
Accepted:
2022-09-06
Online:
2023-02-15
Published:
2023-05-17
Contact:
Jin DU,Chunyang XIANG
郭胜微1(), 边思文1, 丁建文2, 张晓辰2, 杨兴2, 杜锦1(
), 向春阳1(
)
通讯作者:
杜锦,向春阳
作者简介:
郭胜微 E-mail: guo8871@sina.com
基金资助:
CLC Number:
Shengwei GUO, Siwen BIAN, Jianwen DING, Xiaochen ZHANG, Xing YANG, Jin DU, Chunyang XIANG. Comprehensive Evaluation of Low Temperature Tolerance of Waxy Maize Varieties at Germination Stage[J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2023, 25(2): 38-47.
郭胜微, 边思文, 丁建文, 张晓辰, 杨兴, 杜锦, 向春阳. 糯玉米萌发期耐低温品种资源的综合评价[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2023, 25(2): 38-47.
编号Code | 品种名称Name of variety | 编号 Code | 品种名称Name of variety | 编号 Code | 品种名称Name of variety | 编号 Code | 品种名称Name of variety |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 京科糯2000 Jingkenuo 2000 | 13 | 万糯2000 Wannuo 2000 | 25 | 润糯175 Runnuo175 | 37 | 天贵糯932 Tianguinuo 932 |
2 | 景坡白糯 Jingpobainuo | 14 | 景科糯1号 Jingkenuo 1 | 26 | 润甜糯760 Runtiannuo 760 | 38 | 润糯73 Runnuo 73 |
3 | 农科玉336 Nongkeyu 336 | 15 | 润黑糯729 Runheinuo 729 | 27 | 润甜糯618 Runtiannuo 618 | 39 | 润甜糯828 Runtiannuo 828 |
4 | 津糯215 Jinnuo 215 | 16 | 彩甜糯6号 Caitiannuo 6 | 28 | 景糯307 Jingnuo 307 | 40 | 大黄粘 Dahuangnian |
5 | 润黑糯829 Runheinuo 829 | 17 | 景坡82 Jingpo 82 | 29 | 景彩甜糯2128 Jingcaitiannuo 2128 | 41 | 润甜糯876 Runtiannuo 876 |
6 | 润糯72 Runnuo 72 | 18 | 润黑甜糯966 Runheitiannuo 966 | 30 | 润糯605 Runnuo 605 | 42 | 华耐甜糯358 Huanaitiannuo 358 |
7 | 润糯163 Runnuo 163 | 19 | 润黑糯529 Runheinuo 529 | 31 | 景颇早18 Jingpozao 18 | 43 | 栗香红糯 Lixianghongnuo |
8 | 润彩糯686 Runcainuo 686 | 20 | 津糯72 Jinnuo 72 | 32 | 景颇556 Jingpo 556 | 44 | 津糯1+1 Jinnuo 1+1 |
9 | 津糯69 Jinnuo 69 | 21 | 景坡银糯 Jingpoyinnuo | 33 | 润糯597 Runnuo 597 | 45 | 润糯863 Runnuo 863 |
10 | 润糯1704 Runnuo 1704 | 22 | 润甜糯907 Runtiannuo 907 | 34 | 润糯615 Runnuo 615 | 46 | 黄糯早53 Huangnuozao 53 |
11 | 润糯622 Runnuo 622 | 23 | 润黑糯629 Runheinuo 629 | 35 | 景颇早糯 Jingpozaonuo | 47 | 润糯197 Runnuo 197 |
12 | 润甜糯70 Runtiannuo 70 | 24 | 景甜糯1248 Jingtiannuo 1248 | 36 | 津糯711 Jinnuo 711 | 48 | 润糯650 Runnuo 650 |
Table 1 48 tested waxy maize varieties
编号Code | 品种名称Name of variety | 编号 Code | 品种名称Name of variety | 编号 Code | 品种名称Name of variety | 编号 Code | 品种名称Name of variety |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 京科糯2000 Jingkenuo 2000 | 13 | 万糯2000 Wannuo 2000 | 25 | 润糯175 Runnuo175 | 37 | 天贵糯932 Tianguinuo 932 |
2 | 景坡白糯 Jingpobainuo | 14 | 景科糯1号 Jingkenuo 1 | 26 | 润甜糯760 Runtiannuo 760 | 38 | 润糯73 Runnuo 73 |
3 | 农科玉336 Nongkeyu 336 | 15 | 润黑糯729 Runheinuo 729 | 27 | 润甜糯618 Runtiannuo 618 | 39 | 润甜糯828 Runtiannuo 828 |
4 | 津糯215 Jinnuo 215 | 16 | 彩甜糯6号 Caitiannuo 6 | 28 | 景糯307 Jingnuo 307 | 40 | 大黄粘 Dahuangnian |
5 | 润黑糯829 Runheinuo 829 | 17 | 景坡82 Jingpo 82 | 29 | 景彩甜糯2128 Jingcaitiannuo 2128 | 41 | 润甜糯876 Runtiannuo 876 |
6 | 润糯72 Runnuo 72 | 18 | 润黑甜糯966 Runheitiannuo 966 | 30 | 润糯605 Runnuo 605 | 42 | 华耐甜糯358 Huanaitiannuo 358 |
7 | 润糯163 Runnuo 163 | 19 | 润黑糯529 Runheinuo 529 | 31 | 景颇早18 Jingpozao 18 | 43 | 栗香红糯 Lixianghongnuo |
8 | 润彩糯686 Runcainuo 686 | 20 | 津糯72 Jinnuo 72 | 32 | 景颇556 Jingpo 556 | 44 | 津糯1+1 Jinnuo 1+1 |
9 | 津糯69 Jinnuo 69 | 21 | 景坡银糯 Jingpoyinnuo | 33 | 润糯597 Runnuo 597 | 45 | 润糯863 Runnuo 863 |
10 | 润糯1704 Runnuo 1704 | 22 | 润甜糯907 Runtiannuo 907 | 34 | 润糯615 Runnuo 615 | 46 | 黄糯早53 Huangnuozao 53 |
11 | 润糯622 Runnuo 622 | 23 | 润黑糯629 Runheinuo 629 | 35 | 景颇早糯 Jingpozaonuo | 47 | 润糯197 Runnuo 197 |
12 | 润甜糯70 Runtiannuo 70 | 24 | 景甜糯1248 Jingtiannuo 1248 | 36 | 津糯711 Jinnuo 711 | 48 | 润糯650 Runnuo 650 |
Fig. 1 Correlation of indexes of 48 waxy maize varieties under chilling stressNote: RGE—Relative germination energy; RGR—Relative germination rate; RVI—Relative vigour index; RSL—Relative seedling length; RRL—Relative root length; RRSA—Relative root surface area; RRV—Relative root volume; RSDW—Relative shoot dry weight; RRDW—Relative root dry weight; RRN—Relative roots number; ** indicates significant correlation at P<0.01 level.
KMO检验KMO test | 0.726 | |
---|---|---|
球体检验 Bartlett test | 近似卡方Approx. Chi-Square | 792.326 |
自由度df | 45 | |
显著性Significance | 0.000 |
Table 2 KMO and Bartlett compatibility test
KMO检验KMO test | 0.726 | |
---|---|---|
球体检验 Bartlett test | 近似卡方Approx. Chi-Square | 792.326 |
自由度df | 45 | |
显著性Significance | 0.000 |
指标Index | 第1主成分PC 1 | 第2主成分PC 2 |
---|---|---|
相对发芽势RGE | 0.227 | 0.309 |
相对发芽率RGR | 0.268 | 0.374 |
相对活力指数RVI | 0.328 | 0.372 |
相对苗长RSL | 0.340 | -0.025 |
相对根长RRL | 0.350 | -0.314 |
相对根表面积RRSA | 0.358 | -0.309 |
相对根体积RRV | 0.351 | -0.284 |
相对苗干重RSDW | 0.253 | 0.463 |
相对根干重RRDW | 0.363 | 0.067 |
相对根系数RRN | 0.290 | -0.363 |
特征值Eigenvalue | 6.477 | 1.442 |
贡献率Contribution rate/% | 64.766 | 14.417 |
累计贡献率Cumulative contribution rate/% | 64.766 | 79.183 |
Table 3 Eigenvectors and percentage of accumulated contribution of two principal components
指标Index | 第1主成分PC 1 | 第2主成分PC 2 |
---|---|---|
相对发芽势RGE | 0.227 | 0.309 |
相对发芽率RGR | 0.268 | 0.374 |
相对活力指数RVI | 0.328 | 0.372 |
相对苗长RSL | 0.340 | -0.025 |
相对根长RRL | 0.350 | -0.314 |
相对根表面积RRSA | 0.358 | -0.309 |
相对根体积RRV | 0.351 | -0.284 |
相对苗干重RSDW | 0.253 | 0.463 |
相对根干重RRDW | 0.363 | 0.067 |
相对根系数RRN | 0.290 | -0.363 |
特征值Eigenvalue | 6.477 | 1.442 |
贡献率Contribution rate/% | 64.766 | 14.417 |
累计贡献率Cumulative contribution rate/% | 64.766 | 79.183 |
品种 Variety | Y1 | Y2 | U1 | U2 | D值 D value | 排名Ranking |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
京科糯2000 Jingkenuo 2000 | -1.578 | -0.396 | 0.336 | 0.623 | 0.388 | 36 |
景坡白糯 Jingpobainuo | 0.842 | 0.007 | 0.544 | 0.682 | 0.569 | 19 |
农科玉336 Nongkeyu 336 | 2.077 | -0.046 | 0.650 | 0.674 | 0.654 | 10 |
津糯215 Jinnuo 215 | -1.192 | -1.566 | 0.369 | 0.450 | 0.384 | 38 |
润黑糯829 Runheinuo 829 | 2.625 | -0.620 | 0.697 | 0.589 | 0.677 | 8 |
润糯72 Runnuo 72 | 0.903 | -0.757 | 0.549 | 0.569 | 0.553 | 20 |
润糯163 Runnuo 163 | -2.603 | -1.186 | 0.249 | 0.506 | 0.295 | 43 |
润彩糯686 Runcainuo 686 | 6.167 | -0.159 | 1.000 | 0.658 | 0.938 | 1 |
津糯69 Jinnuo 69 | -3.697 | -0.831 | 0.155 | 0.558 | 0.228 | 46 |
润糯1704 Runnuo 1704 | -2.757 | 0.238 | 0.235 | 0.716 | 0.323 | 40 |
润糯622 Runnuo 622 | 2.830 | -4.612 | 0.714 | 0.000 | 0.584 | 15 |
润甜糯70 Runtiannuo 70 | -0.107 | 0.138 | 0.462 | 0.701 | 0.506 | 26 |
万糯2000 Wannuo 2000 | 1.538 | 1.191 | 0.603 | 0.857 | 0.650 | 11 |
景科糯1号 Jingkenuo 1 | -0.363 | 1.383 | 0.440 | 0.885 | 0.521 | 24 |
润黑糯729 Runheinuo 729 | 2.066 | 1.090 | 0.649 | 0.842 | 0.684 | 7 |
彩甜糯6号 Caitiannuo 6 | -0.887 | 0.816 | 0.396 | 0.801 | 0.469 | 31 |
景坡82 Jingpo 82 | 4.599 | 2.160 | 0.866 | 1.000 | 0.890 | 2 |
润黑甜糯966 Runheitiannuo 966 | 0.951 | -0.173 | 0.553 | 0.655 | 0.572 | 17 |
润黑糯529 Runheinuo 529 | 1.147 | 0.560 | 0.570 | 0.764 | 0.605 | 13 |
津糯72 Jinnuo 72 | -5.295 | 0.450 | 0.018 | 0.747 | 0.151 | 47 |
景坡银糯 Jingpoyinnuo | 0.005 | 1.013 | 0.472 | 0.831 | 0.537 | 22 |
润甜糯907 Runtiannuo 907 | -2.674 | -0.246 | 0.242 | 0.645 | 0.316 | 41 |
润黑糯629 Runheinuo 629 | 1.673 | -1.838 | 0.615 | 0.410 | 0.578 | 16 |
景甜糯1248 Jingtiannuo 1248 | -2.268 | 0.180 | 0.277 | 0.708 | 0.356 | 39 |
润糯175 Runnuo 175 | 4.582 | -0.397 | 0.864 | 0.622 | 0.820 | 3 |
润甜糯760 Runtiannuo 760 | 1.870 | -0.080 | 0.632 | 0.669 | 0.639 | 12 |
润甜糯618 Runtiannuo 618 | -1.436 | -0.317 | 0.349 | 0.634 | 0.401 | 34 |
景糯307 Jingnuo 307 | 2.089 | 1.986 | 0.651 | 0.974 | 0.709 | 6 |
景彩甜糯2128 Jingcaitiannuo 2128 | -1.162 | 0.666 | 0.372 | 0.779 | 0.446 | 32 |
润糯605 Runnuo 605 | 3.580 | 0.957 | 0.778 | 0.822 | 0.786 | 4 |
景颇早18 Jingpozao 18 | 1.396 | 1.926 | 0.591 | 0.965 | 0.659 | 9 |
景颇556 Jingpo 556 | -1.047 | 1.279 | 0.382 | 0.870 | 0.471 | 30 |
润糯597 Runnuo 597 | -5.504 | 0.139 | 0.000 | 0.702 | 0.128 | 48 |
润糯615 Runnuo 615 | 2.039 | -2.376 | 0.646 | 0.330 | 0.589 | 14 |
景颇早糯 Jingpozaonuo | 0.671 | 0.524 | 0.529 | 0.758 | 0.571 | 18 |
津糯711 Jinnuo 711 | -3.148 | -1.248 | 0.202 | 0.497 | 0.256 | 44 |
天贵糯932 Tianguinuo 932 | 3.642 | -0.307 | 0.784 | 0.636 | 0.757 | 5 |
润糯73 Runnuo 73 | -0.328 | 0.155 | 0.443 | 0.704 | 0.491 | 28 |
润甜糯828 Runtiannuo 828 | 0.121 | -0.478 | 0.482 | 0.611 | 0.505 | 27 |
大黄粘 Dahuangnian | 0.082 | 0.924 | 0.479 | 0.818 | 0.540 | 21 |
润甜糯876 Runtiannuo 876 | -1.368 | -1.076 | 0.354 | 0.522 | 0.385 | 37 |
华耐甜糯358 Huanaitiannuo 358 | -4.567 | 1.809 | 0.080 | 0.948 | 0.238 | 45 |
栗香红糯 Lixianghongnuo | 0.168 | 0.122 | 0.486 | 0.699 | 0.525 | 23 |
津糯1+1 Jinnuo 1+1 | 0.080 | 0.216 | 0.478 | 0.713 | 0.521 | 25 |
润糯863 Runnuo 863 | -1.301 | -0.928 | 0.360 | 0.544 | 0.394 | 35 |
黄糯早53 Huangnuozao 53 | -1.316 | 0.111 | 0.359 | 0.697 | 0.420 | 33 |
润糯197 Runnuo 197 | -0.535 | 0.419 | 0.426 | 0.743 | 0.483 | 29 |
润糯650 Runnuo 650 | -2.609 | -0.822 | 0.248 | 0.560 | 0.305 | 42 |
权重Weight | 0.818 | 0.182 |
Table 4 Principal component score, weight, membership function value and D value of low temperature tolerance of 48 waxy maize varieties
品种 Variety | Y1 | Y2 | U1 | U2 | D值 D value | 排名Ranking |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
京科糯2000 Jingkenuo 2000 | -1.578 | -0.396 | 0.336 | 0.623 | 0.388 | 36 |
景坡白糯 Jingpobainuo | 0.842 | 0.007 | 0.544 | 0.682 | 0.569 | 19 |
农科玉336 Nongkeyu 336 | 2.077 | -0.046 | 0.650 | 0.674 | 0.654 | 10 |
津糯215 Jinnuo 215 | -1.192 | -1.566 | 0.369 | 0.450 | 0.384 | 38 |
润黑糯829 Runheinuo 829 | 2.625 | -0.620 | 0.697 | 0.589 | 0.677 | 8 |
润糯72 Runnuo 72 | 0.903 | -0.757 | 0.549 | 0.569 | 0.553 | 20 |
润糯163 Runnuo 163 | -2.603 | -1.186 | 0.249 | 0.506 | 0.295 | 43 |
润彩糯686 Runcainuo 686 | 6.167 | -0.159 | 1.000 | 0.658 | 0.938 | 1 |
津糯69 Jinnuo 69 | -3.697 | -0.831 | 0.155 | 0.558 | 0.228 | 46 |
润糯1704 Runnuo 1704 | -2.757 | 0.238 | 0.235 | 0.716 | 0.323 | 40 |
润糯622 Runnuo 622 | 2.830 | -4.612 | 0.714 | 0.000 | 0.584 | 15 |
润甜糯70 Runtiannuo 70 | -0.107 | 0.138 | 0.462 | 0.701 | 0.506 | 26 |
万糯2000 Wannuo 2000 | 1.538 | 1.191 | 0.603 | 0.857 | 0.650 | 11 |
景科糯1号 Jingkenuo 1 | -0.363 | 1.383 | 0.440 | 0.885 | 0.521 | 24 |
润黑糯729 Runheinuo 729 | 2.066 | 1.090 | 0.649 | 0.842 | 0.684 | 7 |
彩甜糯6号 Caitiannuo 6 | -0.887 | 0.816 | 0.396 | 0.801 | 0.469 | 31 |
景坡82 Jingpo 82 | 4.599 | 2.160 | 0.866 | 1.000 | 0.890 | 2 |
润黑甜糯966 Runheitiannuo 966 | 0.951 | -0.173 | 0.553 | 0.655 | 0.572 | 17 |
润黑糯529 Runheinuo 529 | 1.147 | 0.560 | 0.570 | 0.764 | 0.605 | 13 |
津糯72 Jinnuo 72 | -5.295 | 0.450 | 0.018 | 0.747 | 0.151 | 47 |
景坡银糯 Jingpoyinnuo | 0.005 | 1.013 | 0.472 | 0.831 | 0.537 | 22 |
润甜糯907 Runtiannuo 907 | -2.674 | -0.246 | 0.242 | 0.645 | 0.316 | 41 |
润黑糯629 Runheinuo 629 | 1.673 | -1.838 | 0.615 | 0.410 | 0.578 | 16 |
景甜糯1248 Jingtiannuo 1248 | -2.268 | 0.180 | 0.277 | 0.708 | 0.356 | 39 |
润糯175 Runnuo 175 | 4.582 | -0.397 | 0.864 | 0.622 | 0.820 | 3 |
润甜糯760 Runtiannuo 760 | 1.870 | -0.080 | 0.632 | 0.669 | 0.639 | 12 |
润甜糯618 Runtiannuo 618 | -1.436 | -0.317 | 0.349 | 0.634 | 0.401 | 34 |
景糯307 Jingnuo 307 | 2.089 | 1.986 | 0.651 | 0.974 | 0.709 | 6 |
景彩甜糯2128 Jingcaitiannuo 2128 | -1.162 | 0.666 | 0.372 | 0.779 | 0.446 | 32 |
润糯605 Runnuo 605 | 3.580 | 0.957 | 0.778 | 0.822 | 0.786 | 4 |
景颇早18 Jingpozao 18 | 1.396 | 1.926 | 0.591 | 0.965 | 0.659 | 9 |
景颇556 Jingpo 556 | -1.047 | 1.279 | 0.382 | 0.870 | 0.471 | 30 |
润糯597 Runnuo 597 | -5.504 | 0.139 | 0.000 | 0.702 | 0.128 | 48 |
润糯615 Runnuo 615 | 2.039 | -2.376 | 0.646 | 0.330 | 0.589 | 14 |
景颇早糯 Jingpozaonuo | 0.671 | 0.524 | 0.529 | 0.758 | 0.571 | 18 |
津糯711 Jinnuo 711 | -3.148 | -1.248 | 0.202 | 0.497 | 0.256 | 44 |
天贵糯932 Tianguinuo 932 | 3.642 | -0.307 | 0.784 | 0.636 | 0.757 | 5 |
润糯73 Runnuo 73 | -0.328 | 0.155 | 0.443 | 0.704 | 0.491 | 28 |
润甜糯828 Runtiannuo 828 | 0.121 | -0.478 | 0.482 | 0.611 | 0.505 | 27 |
大黄粘 Dahuangnian | 0.082 | 0.924 | 0.479 | 0.818 | 0.540 | 21 |
润甜糯876 Runtiannuo 876 | -1.368 | -1.076 | 0.354 | 0.522 | 0.385 | 37 |
华耐甜糯358 Huanaitiannuo 358 | -4.567 | 1.809 | 0.080 | 0.948 | 0.238 | 45 |
栗香红糯 Lixianghongnuo | 0.168 | 0.122 | 0.486 | 0.699 | 0.525 | 23 |
津糯1+1 Jinnuo 1+1 | 0.080 | 0.216 | 0.478 | 0.713 | 0.521 | 25 |
润糯863 Runnuo 863 | -1.301 | -0.928 | 0.360 | 0.544 | 0.394 | 35 |
黄糯早53 Huangnuozao 53 | -1.316 | 0.111 | 0.359 | 0.697 | 0.420 | 33 |
润糯197 Runnuo 197 | -0.535 | 0.419 | 0.426 | 0.743 | 0.483 | 29 |
润糯650 Runnuo 650 | -2.609 | -0.822 | 0.248 | 0.560 | 0.305 | 42 |
权重Weight | 0.818 | 0.182 |
1 | FEDOROFF N, WESSLER S, SHURE M. Isolation of the transposable maize controlling elements Ac Ds [J]. Cell, 1983, 35(1):235-242. |
2 | DONG L, QI X, ZHU J, et al.. Supersweet and waxy:meeting the diverse demands for specialty maize by genome editing [J]. Plant Biotechnol. J., 2019, 17(10):1853-1855. |
3 | 史亚兴,徐丽,赵久然,等.中国糯玉米产业优势及在“一带一路”发展中的机遇[J].作物杂志,2019(2):15-19. |
SHI Y X, XU L, ZHAO J R, et al.. Waxy maize industry advantages in China and opportunities in the development of the belt and road [J]. Crops, 2019(2):15-19. | |
4 | SOBKOWIAK A, JOŃCZYK M, ADAMCZYK J, et al.. Molecular foundations of chilling-tolerance of modern maize [J/OL]. BMC Genomics, 2016, 17(1):125 [2022-06-05]. . |
5 | MARTA B, SZAFRANSKA K, POSMYK M. Exogenous melatonin improves antioxidant defense in cucumber seeds (Cucumis sativus L.) germinated under chilling stress [J/OL]. Front. Recent Dev. Plant Sci., 2016, (7):575 [2022-06-05]. . |
6 | 赵小强,方鹏,彭云玲,等.低温胁迫下不同玉米自交系对外源甜菜碱的生理响应[J].干旱地区农业研究,2020, 38(3):81-88. |
ZHAO X Q, FANG P, PENG Y L, et al.. Physiological responses of different maize inbred lines to exogenous GB under low temperature stress [J]. Agric. Res. Arid Area, 2020, 38(3):81-88. | |
7 | VRANOVA E, INZE D, BREUSEGEM F V. Signals transduction during oxidative stress [J]. J. Exp. Bot., 2002, 53(3):1227-1236. |
8 | 孙玉珺,吴玥,马德志,等.外源油菜素内酯对低温胁迫下玉米发芽及幼苗生理特性的影响[J].华北农学报,2019, 34(3):119-128. |
SUN Y J, WU Y, MA D Z, et al.. Effects of brassinolide on seed germination and seedling physiology of maize under low temperature stress [J]. Acta Agric. Boreali-Sin., 2019, 34(3):119-128. | |
9 | MIEDEMA P. The effects of low temperature on Zea mays L. [J]. Adv. Agron.,1982, 35(1):93-129. |
10 | 景宇鹏,连海飞,李焕春,等.玉米耐盐碱能力及评价指标筛选研究[J].中国农业科技导报,2018,20(11):94-104. |
JING Y P, LIAN H F, LI H C, et al.. Study on saline-alkaline tolerance ability and evaluation index selection for corn [J]. J. Agric. Sci. Technol., 2018, 20(11):94-104. | |
11 | 丁圆圆,王曦奥,刘策,等.黄瓜耐湿冷性苗期综合评价预测方程的建立[J].中国农业科技导报,2022,24(11):87-96. |
DING Y Y, WANG X A, LIU C, et al.. Establishment of comprehensive evaluation and prediction equation for cucumber wet-cold tolerance in seedling stage [J]. J. Agric. Sci. Technol., 2022, 24(11):87-96. | |
12 | 杨锦越,任洪,赵晓燕,等.灰色关联分析和聚类分析在玉米品种综合评判中的应用[J].种子,2021,40(12):107-115. |
YANG J Y, REN H, ZHAO X Y, et al.. Application of grey correlational analysis and cluster analysis in comprehensive evaluation of maize varieties [J]. Seeds, 2021, 40(12):107-115. | |
13 | MIDEKSA A, TESFAYE K, RAHIMI M. Agronomic performance, variance components, and clustering in vernonia galamensis germplasm from ethiopia [J/OL]. Int. J. Agron., 2022:5245183 [2022-06-05]. . |
14 | 刘杰,张春宵,李淑芳,等.81份玉米杂交种萌发期耐冷性的鉴定和评价[J].玉米科学,2020,28(5):20-26, 31. |
LIU J, ZHANG C X, LI S F, et al.. Identification and evaluation of cold tolerance of 81 corn hybrids at germination stage [J]. J. Maize Sci., 2020, 28(5):20-26, 31. | |
15 | 褚力嘉,曹士亮,靳羽晗,等.玉米萌发期耐冷性鉴定研究[J].种子,2020,39(1):36-41. |
CHU L J, CAO S L, JIN Y H, et al.. Identification of cold tolerance of maize during germination [J]. Seeds, 2020, 39(1):36-41. | |
16 | 张红生,王州飞.种子学[M].(第三版).北京:科学出版社,2021:1-255. |
ZHANG H S, WANG Z F. Seed Science [M]. (3rd Ed.). Beijing: Science Press, 2021:1-255. | |
17 | REVILLA P, RODRÍGUEZ V M, ORDÁS A, et al.. Association mapping for cold tolerance in two large maize inbred panels [J]. BMC Plant Biol., 2016, 16(1):127-137. |
18 | 赵永锋,韩静静,贾晓艳,等.低温胁迫对不同玉米种子萌发的影响[J].种子,2019,38(5):86-89. |
ZHAO Y F, HAN J J, JIA X Y, et al.. Effects of low temperature stress on seed germination of different maize [J]. Seeds, 2019, 38(5):86-89. | |
19 | GUAN Y J, HU J, WANG X J, et al.. Seed priming with chitosan improves maize germination and seedling growth in relation to physiological changes under low temperature stress [J] . J. Zhejiang Univ. Sci., 2009, 10(6):427-433. |
20 | 吕天放,徐田军,刘月娥,等.低温胁迫对不同基因型玉米种子萌发特性的影响[J].玉米科学,2018,26(6):45-49. |
LYU T F, XU T J, LIU Y E, et al.. Effects of low temperature stress on seed germination of different maize [J]. J. Maize Sci., 2018, 26(6):45-49. | |
21 | MOHAMED M, SHIMAA I, ROBERT D, et al.. Cold stress in maize (Zea mays) is alleviated by the over-expression of Phytoglobin 1 (ZmPgb1.1) [J]. Plant Physiol. Biochem., 2021,167:901-910. |
22 | 刘禹辰.低温对不同品种玉米种子萌发的影响及化控效果研究[D].哈尔滨:东北农业大学,2018. |
LIU Y C. Effects of low temperature on seed germination of different types of maize and chemical regulation effects [D]. Harbin: Northeast Agricultural University, 2018. | |
23 | 黄贺,闫蕾,吕艳,等.甘蓝型油菜发芽期低温耐性的评价与材料筛选[J].中国油料作物学报,2019,41(5):723-734. |
HUANG H, YAN L, LYU Y, et al.. Screening and evaluation of low temperature tolerance of rapeseed (Brassica napus L.) at germination stage [J]. Chin. J. Oil Crop Sci., 2019, 41(5):723-734. | |
24 | 薛云云,白冬梅,田跃霞,等.24份山西花生资源芽期和苗期耐寒性鉴定[J].核农学报,2018,32(3):582-590. |
XUE Y Y, BAI D M, TIAN Y X, et al.. Cold tolerance identification for 24 peanut resources from Shanxi province at the stage of germination and seedling [J]. J. Nucl. Agric. Sci., 2018, 32(3):582-590. | |
25 | ZHAO X C, WEI Y L, ZHANG J J, et al.. Membrane lipids’ metabolism and transcriptional regulation in maize roots under cold stress [J/OL]. Front. Recent Dev. Plant Sci., 2021, 12:639132 [2022-06-05]. . |
26 | HUND A, FRACHEBOUD Y, SOLDATI A, et al.. QTL controlling root and shoot traits of maize seedlings under cold stress [J]. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol., 2004, 65(3):618-629. |
27 | 张陇艳,程功敏,魏恒玲,等.陆地棉种子萌发期对低温胁迫的响应及耐冷性鉴定[J].中国农业科学,2021,54(1):19-33. |
ZHANG L Y, CHENG G M, WEI H L, et al.. Chilling tolerance identification and response to cold stress of Gossypium hirsutum varieties (lines) during germination stage [J]. Chin. Agric. Sci., 2021, 54(1):19-33. | |
28 | 王丽艳,唐金敏,郑桂萍,等.水稻萌发期和幼苗期耐低温指标体系构建及综合评价[J].中国农业科技导报,2019,21(10):58-65. |
WANG L Y, TANG J M, ZHENG G P, et al.. Characterization and evaluation of low temperature resistance of rice at germination and seedling stages [J]. J. Agric. Sci. Technol., 2019, 21(10):58-65. | |
29 | 王英成,芦光新,邓晖,等.基于主成分分析的青贮玉米品种农艺性状评价及筛选研究[J].草地学报,2019,27(6):1725-1732. |
WANG Y C, LU G X, DENG H, et al.. Evaluation and screening of agricultural characters of silage maize varieties based on principal component analysis [J]. Acta Agrestia Sin., 2019, 27(6):1725-1732. | |
30 | 蔺豆豆,赵桂琴,琚泽亮,等.15份燕麦材料苗期抗旱性综合评价[J].草业学报,2021,30(11):108-121. |
LIN D D, ZHAO G Q, JU Z L, et al.. Comprehensive evaluation of drought resistance of 15 oat varieties at the seedling stage [J]. J. Grass Ind., 2021, 30(11):108-121. | |
31 | 彭云玲,王亚昕,赵小强,等.不同玉米自交系耐寒性评价及差异分析[J].干旱地区农业研究,2016,34(3):267-280. |
PENG Y L, WANG Y X, ZHAO X Q, et al.. Evaluation and difference analysis of cold tolerance of different maize inbred lines [J]. Agric. Res. Arid Area, 2016, 34(3):267-280. | |
32 | 卢柏山,董会,史亚兴,等.不同品种鲜食玉米体外抗氧化能力综合评价[J].华北农学报,2021,36():101-110. |
LU B S, DONG H, SHI Y X, et al.. Comprehensive evaluation of antioxidant capacity in vitro of different varieties of fresh corn [J]. Acta Agric. Boreali-Sin., 2021, 36(S1):101-110. | |
33 | 吴奇,周宇飞,高悦,等.不同高粱品种萌发期抗旱性筛选与鉴定[J].作物学报,2016,42(8):1233-1246. |
WU Q, ZHOU Y F, GAO Y, et al.. Screening and identification for drought resistance during germination in sorghum cultivars [J]. Acta Agron. Sin., 2016, 42(8):1233-1246. | |
34 | 李红宇,李逸,司洋,等.北方粳稻耐盐碱相关性状主成分分析及综合评价[J].核农学报,2020,34(8):1862-1871. |
LI H Y, LI Y, SI Y, et al.. Principal component analysis and comprehensive evaluation of saline-alkaline tolerance related traits of northern japonica rice [J]. J. Nucl. Agric. Sci., 2020, 34(8):1862-1871. |
[1] | Guanqun CHAI, Guihua LIU, Wei ZHOU, Xiujin ZHANG, Longpin LI, Chengwu FAN. Evaluation of Pollution Risk and Source Analysis of Heavy Metals in Greenhouse Soils in Wumeng Mountain Area, Guizhou Province [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2022, 24(8): 144-153. |
[2] | Xiaxia LI, Siyu ZHANG, Zhihui CHENG. Regional Trial Evaluation of High Quality Garlic Cultivars of China [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2022, 24(7): 58-68. |
[3] | Yuancheng ZHOU, Yongli CAO, Zhen WANG, Zhirong JIA, Yong YAO, Aiping CHEN. Screening and Evaluation of Drought Resistance Indexes in Different Barley Varieties [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2022, 24(2): 86-92. |
[4] | LI Junjie, DU Pufang, SHI Tingrui, HOU Peijia, CHAI Xinyu, ZHAO Rui, WANG Yu, LI Hongxia. LI Junjie, DU Pufang, SHI Tingrui, HOU Peijia, CHAI Xinyu, ZHAO Rui, WANG Yu, LI Hongxia* [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2021, 23(7): 21-32. |
[5] | WANG Ying1, YU Yanghua2*. Evolution in the Spatio-temporal Pattern of Agricultural Sustainable Development Level in China Based on Multi-scales [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2021, 23(3): 8-17. |
[6] | LUO Lina1, HAN Shuquan1*, WANG Daigu1, LI Maofu2, MA Weihong3, ZHANG Zhengxue1, LIU Xiaocui1. Analysis and Evaluation of the Differences in Fruit Quality of Avocado [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2021, 23(3): 105-113. |
[7] | CHEN Xiaojie, LYU Desheng, WANG Zhenhua, LI Wenhao, ZONG Rui, WEN Yue, ZOU Jie. Effects of Water and Nitrogen Coupling on the Yield and Quality of Processing Tomato Under Aerated Irrigation [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2021, 23(11): 191-200. |
[8] | ZHANG Yongfang, GAO Zhihui, SHI Pengqing, HAN Zhiping*. Adaptability Analysis of Different Soybean Varieties Based on Agronomic and Quality Traits [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2020, 22(8): 25-32. |
[9] |
WANG Hui, YANG Yuan, SHI Jinbo.
Adaptability Evaluation of Different Common Buckwheat Varieties (Lines) in Northern Shanxi
[J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2020, 22(8): 33-40.
|
[10] | SHI Yutao1, ZHENG Shulin1, WANG Feiquan1, CHEN Rongbing1, LI Yuanhua1, ZHANG Bo1, WANG Han2, LIN Li2. Characteristics Analysis of Mineral Element Contents in Wuyi Mingcong Tea Plant Germplasm Resources [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2020, 22(7): 37-50. |
[11] | WANG Ruixia, LI Xiaoyu, TIAN Hongxian*. Drought Resistance Identification and Comprehensive Drought Resistance Index Screening of Rapeseed(Brassica juncea L.)in North Shanxi#br# [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2020, 22(11): 42-51. |
[12] | WANG Zhongyun1, YU Yanghua2*, WANG Qianzi1. Effects of Nutrient Management Measures on Soil Fertility of Pitaya in Dry-hot Valley [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2020, 22(11): 176-186. |
[13] | ZHOU Yu1,2, CHEN Mengmeng1, LIU Qing1, MA Xinchao1, GENG Yangyang1,2, YANG Ping1,2, MA Guocai3, XUAN Zhengying1,2*. Effects of Different Proportions of Yellow Sand and Slag on the Growth and Physiological Characteristics of Greenhouse Cucumber Plants [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2019, 21(9): 117-124. |
[14] | SONG Yanping1, YU Yanghua2*, YANG Danli1, LUO Jing1. Studies on Soil Fertility Quality of Zanthoxylum planispinum var. Dingtanensis in Different Planting Bases [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2019, 21(9): 125-136. |
[15] | WANG Feiquan1, FENG Hua1, LUO Shengcai2, CHEN Rongbing1, YANG Huizhu1, LI Shaohua1, ZHNAG Jianming3, ZHANG Bo1, YE Jianghua1. Diversity Analysis of Agronomic Traits of Wuyi Mingcong Tea Plant Germplasm Resources [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2019, 21(6): 43-54. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||