Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology ›› 2023, Vol. 25 ›› Issue (5): 139-146.DOI: 10.13304/j.nykjdb.2022.1011
• ANIMAL AND PLANT HEALTH • Previous Articles
Jianhua WANG1,2(), Xiaolei WEN1,2(
), Jianing LI1,2, Sirou GUO1,2, Chunming ZHAO2, Shifeng MU1,2, Dexuan ZHAO1,2, Huixia QI1,2(
)
Received:
2022-11-20
Accepted:
2023-03-10
Online:
2023-05-20
Published:
2023-07-13
Contact:
Huixia QI
王建华1,2(), 温晓蕾1,2(
), 栗佳宁1,2, 郭思柔1,2, 赵春明2, 母时风1,2, 赵德轩1,2, 齐慧霞1,2(
)
通讯作者:
齐慧霞
作者简介:
王建华 E-mail:1107941082@qq.com基金资助:
CLC Number:
Jianhua WANG, Xiaolei WEN, Jianing LI, Sirou GUO, Chunming ZHAO, Shifeng MU, Dexuan ZHAO, Huixia QI. Field Control Efficacy and Cost Analysis of Different Spraying Methods for Control of Oligonychus ununguis (Jacobi)[J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2023, 25(5): 139-146.
王建华, 温晓蕾, 栗佳宁, 郭思柔, 赵春明, 母时风, 赵德轩, 齐慧霞. 不同施药方式对板栗红蜘蛛田间防效和效益分析[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2023, 25(5): 139-146.
供试药剂Acaricide for test | 稀释倍数Dilution time |
---|---|
20%阿维·螺螨酯悬浮剂20% avermectin·spirodiclofen SC | 500、1 000、1 500、2 000、2 500 |
29%石硫合剂水剂29% calcium polysulfide AS | 0.1、0.3、0.5、0.7、0.9* |
10%阿维菌素悬浮剂10% avermectin SC | 7 000、8 000、9 000、10 000、11 000 |
36%联肼·螺螨酯悬浮剂36% bifenazate·spirodiclofen SC | 4 500、5 500、6 500、7 500、8 500 |
20%乙螨唑悬浮剂20% etoxazole SC | 2 500、3 000、3 500、4 000、4 500 |
24%螺螨酯悬浮剂+40%丙溴磷乳油24% spirodiclofen SC+40% profenofos EC | 3 000+550、4 000+650、5 000+750、6 000+850、7 000+950 |
对照CK | — |
Table 1 Laboratory test acaricides and contents
供试药剂Acaricide for test | 稀释倍数Dilution time |
---|---|
20%阿维·螺螨酯悬浮剂20% avermectin·spirodiclofen SC | 500、1 000、1 500、2 000、2 500 |
29%石硫合剂水剂29% calcium polysulfide AS | 0.1、0.3、0.5、0.7、0.9* |
10%阿维菌素悬浮剂10% avermectin SC | 7 000、8 000、9 000、10 000、11 000 |
36%联肼·螺螨酯悬浮剂36% bifenazate·spirodiclofen SC | 4 500、5 500、6 500、7 500、8 500 |
20%乙螨唑悬浮剂20% etoxazole SC | 2 500、3 000、3 500、4 000、4 500 |
24%螺螨酯悬浮剂+40%丙溴磷乳油24% spirodiclofen SC+40% profenofos EC | 3 000+550、4 000+650、5 000+750、6 000+850、7 000+950 |
对照CK | — |
处理编号Treatment code | 供试药剂Acaricide for test | 稀释倍数Dilution time |
---|---|---|
1 | 20%阿维·螺螨酯悬浮剂 20% avermectin·spirodiclofen SC | 1 000 |
2 | 29%石硫合剂水剂 29% calcium polysulfide AS | 0.1* |
3 | 10%阿维菌素悬浮剂 10% avermectin SC | 7 000 |
4 | 36%联肼·螺螨酯悬浮剂 36% bifenazate·spirodiclofen SC | 2 500 |
5 | 20%乙螨唑悬浮剂 20% etoxazole SC | 3 500 |
6 | 24%螺螨酯悬浮剂+40%丙溴磷乳油 24% spirodiclofen SC+40% profenofos EC | 3 000+550 |
7 | 对照CK | — |
Table 2 Acaricides and applied contents in field trial
处理编号Treatment code | 供试药剂Acaricide for test | 稀释倍数Dilution time |
---|---|---|
1 | 20%阿维·螺螨酯悬浮剂 20% avermectin·spirodiclofen SC | 1 000 |
2 | 29%石硫合剂水剂 29% calcium polysulfide AS | 0.1* |
3 | 10%阿维菌素悬浮剂 10% avermectin SC | 7 000 |
4 | 36%联肼·螺螨酯悬浮剂 36% bifenazate·spirodiclofen SC | 2 500 |
5 | 20%乙螨唑悬浮剂 20% etoxazole SC | 3 500 |
6 | 24%螺螨酯悬浮剂+40%丙溴磷乳油 24% spirodiclofen SC+40% profenofos EC | 3 000+550 |
7 | 对照CK | — |
杀螨剂 Acaricide | 稀释倍数Dilution time | 药前基数 Initial population number | 药后24 h 24 h after application | 药后48 h 48 h after application | 药后72 h 72 h after application | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
虫口减退率 Decrease rate/% | 防治效果 Control efficacy/% | 虫口 减退率 Decrease rate/% | 防治效果 Control efficacy/% | 虫口减退率Decrease rate/% | 防治效果 Control efficacy/% | |||||
20%阿维·螺螨酯悬浮剂 20% avermectin·spirodiclofen SC | 500 | 61.33±10.14 | 99.2±0.8 | 99.2±0.8 Aa | 100.0±0.0 | 100.0±0.0 Aa | 100.0±0.0 | 100.0±0.0 Aa | ||
1 000 | 59.00±7.21 | 97.9±1.4 | 97.9±1.4 ABab | 99.5±0.5 | 99.5±0.5 Aa | 100.0±0.0 | 100.0±0.0 Aa | |||
1 500 | 64.33±7.12 | 95.3±0.7 | 95.2±0.8 ABbc | 98.5±0.8 | 98.0±1.1 ABab | 99.6±0.4 | 99.3±0.7 ABa | |||
2 000 | 69.67±8.84 | 93.5±1.2 | 93.4±2.0 BCc | 97.0±0.3 | 96.4±0.7 BCb | 98.9±0.6 | 98.6±0.8 ABa | |||
2 500 | 51.33±1.45 | 89.7±1.1 | 89.4±1.1 Cd | 94.8±0.6 | 93.9±0.2 Cc | 97.4±0.6 | 96.8±0.7 Bb | |||
10%阿维菌素悬浮剂 10% avermectin SC | 7 000 | 54.33±1.45 | 97.5±0.6 | 97.5±0.6 Aa | 99.4±0.6 | 99.4±0.6 Aa | 100.0±0.0 | 100.0±0.0 Aa | ||
8 000 | 48.67±4.63 | 94.5±0.4 | 94.4±0.4 Bb | 98.7±0.7 | 98.3±0.9 Aa | 99.4±0.6 | 99.3±0.7 Aa | |||
9 000 | 64.67±2.33 | 92.8±0.4 | 92.6±0.5 Bb | 97.5±0.5 | 96.8±0.8 Aa | 99.0±0.5 | 98.6±0.7 Aa | |||
10 000 | 60.33±1.45 | 86.8±0.6 | 86.5±0.6 Cc | 92.8±0.4 | 91.4±0.7 Bb | 96.7±0.1 | 95.8±0.6 Bb | |||
11 000 | 70.00±14.42 | 82.1±0.7 | 81.7±0.9 Dd | 90.1±0.2 | 88.0±1.3 Bc | 94.0±0.8 | 92.6±0.7 Cc | |||
29%石硫合剂水剂 29% calcium polysulfide AS | 0.1* | 61.33±8.84 | 100.0±0.0 | 100.0±0.0 Aa | 100.0±0.0 | 100.0±0.0 Aa | 100.0±0.0 | 100.0±0.0 Aa | ||
0.3* | 61.67±3.38 | 100.0±0.0 | 100.0±0.0 Aa | 100.0±0.0 | 100.0±0.0 Aa | 100.0±0.0 | 100.0±0.0 Aa | |||
0.5* | 88.67±3.84 | 100.0±0.0 | 100.0±0.0 Aa | 100.0±0.0 | 100.0±0.0 Aa | 100.0±0.0 | 100.0±0.0 Aa | |||
0.7* | 57.67±3.28 | 100.0±0.0 | 100.0±0.0 Aa | 100.0±0.0 | 100.0±0.0 Aa | 100.0±0.0 | 100.0±0.0 Aa | |||
0.9* | 63.33±7.31 | 100.0±0.0 | 100.0±0.0 Aa | 100.0±0.0 | 100.0±0.0 Aa | 100.0±0.0 | 100.0±0.0 Aa |
Table 3 Indoor control effects of 6 acaricides on Oligonychus ununguis
杀螨剂 Acaricide | 稀释倍数Dilution time | 药前基数 Initial population number | 药后24 h 24 h after application | 药后48 h 48 h after application | 药后72 h 72 h after application | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
虫口减退率 Decrease rate/% | 防治效果 Control efficacy/% | 虫口 减退率 Decrease rate/% | 防治效果 Control efficacy/% | 虫口减退率Decrease rate/% | 防治效果 Control efficacy/% | |||||
20%阿维·螺螨酯悬浮剂 20% avermectin·spirodiclofen SC | 500 | 61.33±10.14 | 99.2±0.8 | 99.2±0.8 Aa | 100.0±0.0 | 100.0±0.0 Aa | 100.0±0.0 | 100.0±0.0 Aa | ||
1 000 | 59.00±7.21 | 97.9±1.4 | 97.9±1.4 ABab | 99.5±0.5 | 99.5±0.5 Aa | 100.0±0.0 | 100.0±0.0 Aa | |||
1 500 | 64.33±7.12 | 95.3±0.7 | 95.2±0.8 ABbc | 98.5±0.8 | 98.0±1.1 ABab | 99.6±0.4 | 99.3±0.7 ABa | |||
2 000 | 69.67±8.84 | 93.5±1.2 | 93.4±2.0 BCc | 97.0±0.3 | 96.4±0.7 BCb | 98.9±0.6 | 98.6±0.8 ABa | |||
2 500 | 51.33±1.45 | 89.7±1.1 | 89.4±1.1 Cd | 94.8±0.6 | 93.9±0.2 Cc | 97.4±0.6 | 96.8±0.7 Bb | |||
10%阿维菌素悬浮剂 10% avermectin SC | 7 000 | 54.33±1.45 | 97.5±0.6 | 97.5±0.6 Aa | 99.4±0.6 | 99.4±0.6 Aa | 100.0±0.0 | 100.0±0.0 Aa | ||
8 000 | 48.67±4.63 | 94.5±0.4 | 94.4±0.4 Bb | 98.7±0.7 | 98.3±0.9 Aa | 99.4±0.6 | 99.3±0.7 Aa | |||
9 000 | 64.67±2.33 | 92.8±0.4 | 92.6±0.5 Bb | 97.5±0.5 | 96.8±0.8 Aa | 99.0±0.5 | 98.6±0.7 Aa | |||
10 000 | 60.33±1.45 | 86.8±0.6 | 86.5±0.6 Cc | 92.8±0.4 | 91.4±0.7 Bb | 96.7±0.1 | 95.8±0.6 Bb | |||
11 000 | 70.00±14.42 | 82.1±0.7 | 81.7±0.9 Dd | 90.1±0.2 | 88.0±1.3 Bc | 94.0±0.8 | 92.6±0.7 Cc | |||
29%石硫合剂水剂 29% calcium polysulfide AS | 0.1* | 61.33±8.84 | 100.0±0.0 | 100.0±0.0 Aa | 100.0±0.0 | 100.0±0.0 Aa | 100.0±0.0 | 100.0±0.0 Aa | ||
0.3* | 61.67±3.38 | 100.0±0.0 | 100.0±0.0 Aa | 100.0±0.0 | 100.0±0.0 Aa | 100.0±0.0 | 100.0±0.0 Aa | |||
0.5* | 88.67±3.84 | 100.0±0.0 | 100.0±0.0 Aa | 100.0±0.0 | 100.0±0.0 Aa | 100.0±0.0 | 100.0±0.0 Aa | |||
0.7* | 57.67±3.28 | 100.0±0.0 | 100.0±0.0 Aa | 100.0±0.0 | 100.0±0.0 Aa | 100.0±0.0 | 100.0±0.0 Aa | |||
0.9* | 63.33±7.31 | 100.0±0.0 | 100.0±0.0 Aa | 100.0±0.0 | 100.0±0.0 Aa | 100.0±0.0 | 100.0±0.0 Aa |
杀螨剂 Acaricide | 稀释倍数Dilution time | 药前基数 Initial population number | 药后24 h 24 h after application | 药后48 h 48 h after application | 药后72 h 72 h after application | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
虫口 减退率 Decrease rate/% | 防治效果 Control efficacy/% | 虫口 减退率 Decrease rate/% | 防治效果 Control efficacy/% | 虫口 减退率Decrease rate/% | 防治效果 Control efficacy/% | |||||
20%乙螨唑悬浮剂 20% etoxazole SC | 4 500 | 69.67±8.09 | 64.5±4.0 | 63.7±3.8 Aa | 79.3±1.5 | 75.2±1.3 Aa | 93.3±2.2 | 90.8±4.1 Aa | ||
5 500 | 68.00±6.66 | 61.8±2.6 | 60.8±3.2 Aab | 71.7±6.2 | 66.2±7.0 Aab | 90.3±1.9 | 87.6±2.7 ABa | |||
6 500 | 57.00±2.65 | 58.0±2.1 | 57.1±2.2 Aabc | 69.4±5.1 | 62.6±7.3 Aab | 82.6±1.8 | 78.1±2.7 BCb | |||
7 500 | 80.33±4.98 | 50.3±4.3 | 49.1±4.3 Abc | 63.9±1.6 | 56.5±3.2 Ab | 78.2±2.3 | 72.9±0.8 Cbc | |||
8 500 | 58.33±4.33 | 46.5±5.2 | 45.3±4.9 Ac | 62.3±6.2 | 55.9±2.6 Ab | 74.6±3.6 | 68.8±0.9 Cc | |||
36%联肼·螺螨酯悬浮剂 36% bifenazate·spirodiclofen SC | 2 500 | 74.67±2.91 | 79.6±2.4 | 79.1±2.7 Aa | 89.7±1.1 | 87.8±0.6 Aa | 97.3±1.4 | 97.0±1.5 Aa | ||
3 000 | 52.00±1.53 | 73.0±1.7 | 72.3±1.9 Aab | 83.3±2.4 | 79.8±3.4 Aa | 94.8±2.4 | 93.4±2.9 Aab | |||
3 500 | 53.33±3.38 | 71.0±2.4 | 70.4±2.3 Aab | 80.7±4.3 | 77.0±4.6 Aa | 92.6±2.7 | 91.4±2.8 Aab | |||
4 000 | 63.00±1.73 | 69.8±2.4 | 69.1±2.4 Ab | 82.5±2.5 | 78.3±5.4 Aa | 92.5±2.1 | 90.8±1.9 Aab | |||
4 500 | 70.67±0.88 | 68.4±3.2 | 67.6±3.6 Ab | 81.6±2.3 | 77.3±4.4 Aa | 90.1±2.1 | 87.3±3.6 Ab | |||
24%螺螨酯悬浮剂+40%丙溴磷乳油 24% spirodiclofen SC+40% profenofos EC | 3 000+550 | 40.67±5.81 | 97.8±1.4 | 97.7±1.4 Aa | 100.0±0.0 | 100.0±0.0 Aa | 100.0±0.0 | 100.0±0.0 Aa | ||
4 000+650 | 37.00±2.00 | 94.7±1.3 | 94.5±1.4 ABab | 100.0±0.0 | 100.0±0.0 Aa | 100.0±0.0 | 100.0±0.0 Aa | |||
5 000+750 | 45.33±7.84 | 92.1±2.3 | 91.9±2.3 ABabc | 100.0±0.0 | 100.0±0.0 Aa | 100.0±0.0 | 100.0±0.0 Aa | |||
6 000+850 | 33.00±2.08 | 87.4±4.8 | 87.2±4.7 ABbc | 100.0±0.0 | 100.0±0.0 Aa | 100.0±0.0 | 100.0±0.0 Aa | |||
7 000+950 | 49.33±4.70 | 84.7±1.9 | 84.3±2.1 Bc | 100.0±0.0 | 100.0±0.0 Aa | 100.0±0.0 | 100.0±0.0 Aa | |||
对照CK | — | 74.00±10.53 | 2.2±1.3 | — | 15.7±9.1 | — | 19.2±9.4 | — |
Table 3 Indoor control effects of 6 acaricides on Oligonychus ununguis
杀螨剂 Acaricide | 稀释倍数Dilution time | 药前基数 Initial population number | 药后24 h 24 h after application | 药后48 h 48 h after application | 药后72 h 72 h after application | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
虫口 减退率 Decrease rate/% | 防治效果 Control efficacy/% | 虫口 减退率 Decrease rate/% | 防治效果 Control efficacy/% | 虫口 减退率Decrease rate/% | 防治效果 Control efficacy/% | |||||
20%乙螨唑悬浮剂 20% etoxazole SC | 4 500 | 69.67±8.09 | 64.5±4.0 | 63.7±3.8 Aa | 79.3±1.5 | 75.2±1.3 Aa | 93.3±2.2 | 90.8±4.1 Aa | ||
5 500 | 68.00±6.66 | 61.8±2.6 | 60.8±3.2 Aab | 71.7±6.2 | 66.2±7.0 Aab | 90.3±1.9 | 87.6±2.7 ABa | |||
6 500 | 57.00±2.65 | 58.0±2.1 | 57.1±2.2 Aabc | 69.4±5.1 | 62.6±7.3 Aab | 82.6±1.8 | 78.1±2.7 BCb | |||
7 500 | 80.33±4.98 | 50.3±4.3 | 49.1±4.3 Abc | 63.9±1.6 | 56.5±3.2 Ab | 78.2±2.3 | 72.9±0.8 Cbc | |||
8 500 | 58.33±4.33 | 46.5±5.2 | 45.3±4.9 Ac | 62.3±6.2 | 55.9±2.6 Ab | 74.6±3.6 | 68.8±0.9 Cc | |||
36%联肼·螺螨酯悬浮剂 36% bifenazate·spirodiclofen SC | 2 500 | 74.67±2.91 | 79.6±2.4 | 79.1±2.7 Aa | 89.7±1.1 | 87.8±0.6 Aa | 97.3±1.4 | 97.0±1.5 Aa | ||
3 000 | 52.00±1.53 | 73.0±1.7 | 72.3±1.9 Aab | 83.3±2.4 | 79.8±3.4 Aa | 94.8±2.4 | 93.4±2.9 Aab | |||
3 500 | 53.33±3.38 | 71.0±2.4 | 70.4±2.3 Aab | 80.7±4.3 | 77.0±4.6 Aa | 92.6±2.7 | 91.4±2.8 Aab | |||
4 000 | 63.00±1.73 | 69.8±2.4 | 69.1±2.4 Ab | 82.5±2.5 | 78.3±5.4 Aa | 92.5±2.1 | 90.8±1.9 Aab | |||
4 500 | 70.67±0.88 | 68.4±3.2 | 67.6±3.6 Ab | 81.6±2.3 | 77.3±4.4 Aa | 90.1±2.1 | 87.3±3.6 Ab | |||
24%螺螨酯悬浮剂+40%丙溴磷乳油 24% spirodiclofen SC+40% profenofos EC | 3 000+550 | 40.67±5.81 | 97.8±1.4 | 97.7±1.4 Aa | 100.0±0.0 | 100.0±0.0 Aa | 100.0±0.0 | 100.0±0.0 Aa | ||
4 000+650 | 37.00±2.00 | 94.7±1.3 | 94.5±1.4 ABab | 100.0±0.0 | 100.0±0.0 Aa | 100.0±0.0 | 100.0±0.0 Aa | |||
5 000+750 | 45.33±7.84 | 92.1±2.3 | 91.9±2.3 ABabc | 100.0±0.0 | 100.0±0.0 Aa | 100.0±0.0 | 100.0±0.0 Aa | |||
6 000+850 | 33.00±2.08 | 87.4±4.8 | 87.2±4.7 ABbc | 100.0±0.0 | 100.0±0.0 Aa | 100.0±0.0 | 100.0±0.0 Aa | |||
7 000+950 | 49.33±4.70 | 84.7±1.9 | 84.3±2.1 Bc | 100.0±0.0 | 100.0±0.0 Aa | 100.0±0.0 | 100.0±0.0 Aa | |||
对照CK | — | 74.00±10.53 | 2.2±1.3 | — | 15.7±9.1 | — | 19.2±9.4 | — |
杀螨剂 Acaricide | 稀释倍数 Dilution time | 药前基数 Initial population number | 药后1 d 1 d after application | 药后3 d 3 d after application | 药后14 d 14 d after application | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
虫口减退率Decrease rate/% | 防治效果 Control efficacy/% | 虫口减退率Decrease rate/% | 防治效果 Control efficacy/% | 虫口减退率 Decrease rate/% | 防治效果 Control efficacy/% | |||||
20%阿维·螺螨酯 悬浮剂 20% avermectin·spirodiclofen SC | 1 000 | 87.00±4.93 | 94.50±2.91 | 94.17±3.11 Aa | 100.00±0.00 | 100.00±0.00 Aa | 97.60±0.51 | 97.80±0.45 Aa | ||
29%石硫合剂水剂 29% calcium polysulfide AS | 0.1* | 49.25±3.57 | 88.27±2.90 | 86.99±3.17 ABa | 96.60±1.38 | 96.16±1.53 Aa | 78.76±2.42 | 80.39±2.36 Cc | ||
10%阿维菌素悬浮剂 10% avermectin SC | 7 000 | 49.75±1.60 | 95.01±1.21 | 94.56±1.17 Aa | 98.95±0.61 | 98.80±0.69 Aa | 87.55±1.41 | 88.59±1.08 Bb | ||
36%联肼·螺螨酯 悬浮剂 36% bifenazate·spirodiclofen SC | 2 500 | 57.75±8.29 | 91.22±3.35 | 90.25±3.68 Aa | 98.14±0.85 | 97.80±1.05 Aa | 94.67±0.68 | 95.07±0.68 Aa | ||
20%乙螨唑悬浮剂 20% etoxazole SC | 3 500 | 47.00±2.35 | 74.14±6.71 | 72.04±6.86 Bb | 87.31±4.49 | 85.11±5.44 Bb | 96.89±0.63 | 97.16±0.53 Aa | ||
24%螺螨酯悬浮剂+40%丙溴磷乳油 24% spirodiclofen SC+40% profenofos EC | 3 000+550 | 52.50±3.23 | 95.64±1.79 | 94.92±2.16 Aa | 99.51±0.49 | 99.39±0.61 Aa | 95.05±0.78 | 95.48±0.62 Aa | ||
对照CK | — | 88.00±12.94 | 9.59±3.67 | — | 12.08±2.65 | — | -8.61±2.28 | — |
Table 4 Effect of 6 acaricides on field control of Oligonychus ununguis
杀螨剂 Acaricide | 稀释倍数 Dilution time | 药前基数 Initial population number | 药后1 d 1 d after application | 药后3 d 3 d after application | 药后14 d 14 d after application | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
虫口减退率Decrease rate/% | 防治效果 Control efficacy/% | 虫口减退率Decrease rate/% | 防治效果 Control efficacy/% | 虫口减退率 Decrease rate/% | 防治效果 Control efficacy/% | |||||
20%阿维·螺螨酯 悬浮剂 20% avermectin·spirodiclofen SC | 1 000 | 87.00±4.93 | 94.50±2.91 | 94.17±3.11 Aa | 100.00±0.00 | 100.00±0.00 Aa | 97.60±0.51 | 97.80±0.45 Aa | ||
29%石硫合剂水剂 29% calcium polysulfide AS | 0.1* | 49.25±3.57 | 88.27±2.90 | 86.99±3.17 ABa | 96.60±1.38 | 96.16±1.53 Aa | 78.76±2.42 | 80.39±2.36 Cc | ||
10%阿维菌素悬浮剂 10% avermectin SC | 7 000 | 49.75±1.60 | 95.01±1.21 | 94.56±1.17 Aa | 98.95±0.61 | 98.80±0.69 Aa | 87.55±1.41 | 88.59±1.08 Bb | ||
36%联肼·螺螨酯 悬浮剂 36% bifenazate·spirodiclofen SC | 2 500 | 57.75±8.29 | 91.22±3.35 | 90.25±3.68 Aa | 98.14±0.85 | 97.80±1.05 Aa | 94.67±0.68 | 95.07±0.68 Aa | ||
20%乙螨唑悬浮剂 20% etoxazole SC | 3 500 | 47.00±2.35 | 74.14±6.71 | 72.04±6.86 Bb | 87.31±4.49 | 85.11±5.44 Bb | 96.89±0.63 | 97.16±0.53 Aa | ||
24%螺螨酯悬浮剂+40%丙溴磷乳油 24% spirodiclofen SC+40% profenofos EC | 3 000+550 | 52.50±3.23 | 95.64±1.79 | 94.92±2.16 Aa | 99.51±0.49 | 99.39±0.61 Aa | 95.05±0.78 | 95.48±0.62 Aa | ||
对照CK | — | 88.00±12.94 | 9.59±3.67 | — | 12.08±2.65 | — | -8.61±2.28 | — |
施药方式 Application method | 药前基数 Initial population number | 药后1 d 1 d after application | 药后2 d 2 d after application | 药后14 d 14 d after application | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
虫口减退率 Decrease rate/% | 防治效果 Control efficacy/% | 虫口减退率 Decrease rate/% | 防治效果 Control efficacy/% | 虫口减退率 Decrease rate/% | 防治效果 Control efficacy/% | ||
无人机喷药 Drone spraying | 2 374.33±831.56 | 59.90±2.83 | 61.45±2.24 Aa | 89.93±1.69 | 91.20±1.37 Aa | 95.98±0.88 | 97.77±0.52 Aa |
人工背负式 电动喷药 Electric knapsack sprayer | 509.33±154.49 | 80.28±1.88 | 80.99±1.90 Bb | 83.25±2.77 | 83.07±4.43 Aa | 83.56±1.34 | 90.58±1.02 Bb |
人工拖管 机械喷药 Engine-operated portable sprayer | 820.67±22.59 | 81.19±1.91 | 81.88±1.88 Bb | 90.87±4.56 | 91.97±3.98 Aa | 98.56±0.66 | 99.19±0.37 Aa |
对照CK | 527.67±41.73 | -3.88±1.63 | — | -13.94±1.92 | — | -82.30±4.47 | — |
Table 5 Control effect of different application methods of 20% avermectin·spirodiclofen SC on Oligonychus ununguis
施药方式 Application method | 药前基数 Initial population number | 药后1 d 1 d after application | 药后2 d 2 d after application | 药后14 d 14 d after application | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
虫口减退率 Decrease rate/% | 防治效果 Control efficacy/% | 虫口减退率 Decrease rate/% | 防治效果 Control efficacy/% | 虫口减退率 Decrease rate/% | 防治效果 Control efficacy/% | ||
无人机喷药 Drone spraying | 2 374.33±831.56 | 59.90±2.83 | 61.45±2.24 Aa | 89.93±1.69 | 91.20±1.37 Aa | 95.98±0.88 | 97.77±0.52 Aa |
人工背负式 电动喷药 Electric knapsack sprayer | 509.33±154.49 | 80.28±1.88 | 80.99±1.90 Bb | 83.25±2.77 | 83.07±4.43 Aa | 83.56±1.34 | 90.58±1.02 Bb |
人工拖管 机械喷药 Engine-operated portable sprayer | 820.67±22.59 | 81.19±1.91 | 81.88±1.88 Bb | 90.87±4.56 | 91.97±3.98 Aa | 98.56±0.66 | 99.19±0.37 Aa |
对照CK | 527.67±41.73 | -3.88±1.63 | — | -13.94±1.92 | — | -82.30±4.47 | — |
施药方式 Application method | 人工成本/ (元·667 m-2) Labor cost/ (yuan·667 m-2) | 用药成本/ (元·667 m-2) Acaricide cost/(yuan·667 m-2) | 总成本/(元·667 m-2) Total cost/ (yuan·667 m-2) | 较无人机防治成本增加Increased cost compared to UAV control/% |
---|---|---|---|---|
人工背负式电动喷药 Electric knapsack sprayer | 36.42±1.29 | 7.86±0.05 | 44.28±1.34 Aa | 38.93 |
人工拖管机械喷药 Engine-operated portable sprayer | 29.08±0.62 | 20.30±0.38 | 49.38±0.99 Ab | 45.24 |
无人机喷药 Drone spraying | 20.00±0.00 | 7.04±0.23 | 27.04±0.23 Bc | — |
Table 6 Benefit analysis of different application methods
施药方式 Application method | 人工成本/ (元·667 m-2) Labor cost/ (yuan·667 m-2) | 用药成本/ (元·667 m-2) Acaricide cost/(yuan·667 m-2) | 总成本/(元·667 m-2) Total cost/ (yuan·667 m-2) | 较无人机防治成本增加Increased cost compared to UAV control/% |
---|---|---|---|---|
人工背负式电动喷药 Electric knapsack sprayer | 36.42±1.29 | 7.86±0.05 | 44.28±1.34 Aa | 38.93 |
人工拖管机械喷药 Engine-operated portable sprayer | 29.08±0.62 | 20.30±0.38 | 49.38±0.99 Ab | 45.24 |
无人机喷药 Drone spraying | 20.00±0.00 | 7.04±0.23 | 27.04±0.23 Bc | — |
1 | 焦蕊,许长新,于丽辰,等.针叶小爪螨的研究进展[J].河北农业科学,2013,17(1):61-64. |
JIAO R, XU C X, YU L C, et al.. Research progress of oligonychus ununguis Jacobi [J]. J. Hebei Agric. Sci., 2013, 17(1):61-64. | |
2 | 孙绪艮,周成刚,张小娣,等.针叶小爪螨对板栗的危害及防治指标初步研究[J].山东农业大学学报,1994,25(2):202-206. |
SUN X G, ZHOU C G, ZHANG X D, et al.. Preliminary studies on damage of Oligonychus ununguis (Jacobi) on Chinese chestnut and its control index [J]. J. Shandong Agric.Univ., 1994,25(2):202-206. | |
3 | 顾丽嫱,李朝辉.唐山市板栗红蜘蛛防治试验[J].北方园艺,2009(9):92-93. |
GU L Q, LI C H. The control experiment of Oligonychus ununguis (Jacobi) to Chinese chestnut in Tangshan [J]. Northern Hortic., 2009(9):92-93. | |
4 | 王会娟.京东板栗主要病虫害及其防治[J].北方园艺,2008(6):208-209. |
5 | 肖云丽,汪玉平,程水源,等.我国板栗害虫研究概述[J].环境昆虫学报,2014,36(3):441-450. |
XIAO Y L, WANG Y P, CHENG S Y, et al.. Review on pests of chestnut in China [J]. J. Environ. Entom., 2014, 36(3):441-450. | |
6 | 王英满,徐丽君,夏锡飞,等.不同施药器械对水稻病虫害的防效试验研究[J].现代农业科技,2009(1):117,120. |
WANG Y M, XU L J, XIA X F, et al.. Experimental study on the control effect of different spraying instruments on rice diseases and insects [J]. Mod. Agric. Sci. Technol., 2009(1):117,120. | |
7 | 伏荣桃,陈诚,王剑,等.植保无人机对水稻病虫害防治条件与防效的研究[J].中国农业科技导报,2021,23(4):103-109. |
FU R T, CHEN C, WANG J, et al.. Control conditions and effects of plant protection unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) on diseases and insect pests of rice [J]. J. Agric. Sci. Technol., 2021, 23(4):103-109. | |
8 | 封云涛,魏明峰,郭晓君,等.三种杀螨剂对山楂叶螨的毒力评价[J].植物保护学报,2018,45 (3):640-646. |
FENG Y T, WEI M F, GUO X J, et al.. Toxicity evaluation of three acaricides against hawthorn spider mite Amphitetranychus viennensis Zacher [J]. J. Plant Prot., 2018, 45(3): 640-646. | |
9 | 李志朋,徐鸿,黄勇.利用捕食螨和药剂防治板栗针叶小爪螨的研究[J].中国植保导刊, 2012,32(6):29-31. |
LI Z P, XU H, HUANG Y. Study on the control of Oligonychus ununguis (Jacobi) with predator mites and pesticides [J]. China Plant Prot., 2012, 32(6):29-31. | |
10 | 赵庆阳. 30%螺螨酯·联 苯肼酯SC防治柑橘红蜘蛛田间药效试验[J].广西植保, 2019,32 (4):19-21. |
ZHAO Q Y. Field efficacy test of 30% spirodiclofen·bifenazate SC against Panonychus citri Mc Gregor [J]. Guangxi Plant Prot., 2019, 32(4):19-21. | |
11 | 韦东胜.13%阿维·螺 螨酯水乳剂对柑橘全爪螨的田间防效[J].广西植保,2017,30(2):22-23. |
WEI D S. Field control effect of 13% avermectin·spirodiclofen WE on Panonychus citri Mc Gregor [J]. Guangxi Plant Prot., 2017, 30(2):22-23. | |
12 | 黄俊源,陆成确,朱江,等.六旋翼无人机在柑橘的应用效益与红蜘蛛防效研究[J].南方园艺,2021,32(6):56-59. |
HUANG J Y, LU C Q, ZHU J, et al.. Study on the application benefit of six rotor UAV in citrus and the prevention effect of red spider [J]. Southern Hortic., 2021, 32(6):56-59. | |
13 | 徐兵强,宋博,熊金铭,等.植保无人机喷雾对枣树主要害虫防治效果评价[J].环境昆虫学报,2021,43(1):245-252. |
XU B Q, SONG B, XIONG J M, et al.. Field evaluation of unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) as sprayer for chemical control of the main pests in jujube orchard [J]. J. Environ. Entom., 2021, 43(1):245-252. | |
14 | 赵新阳,陈焕金,韩杰,等.农用植保无人机茶园病虫害防治效果分析[J].南方农机,2022,53 (4):47-49. |
ZHAO X Y, CHEN H J, HAN J, et al.. Effect analysis of disease and pest control in tea garden by UAV for agricultural plant protection [J]. China Southern Agric. Mach., 2022, 53(4):47-49. |
[1] | FU Rongtao, CHEN Cheng, WANG Jian, CHEN Xuejuan, LU Daihua*. Control Conditions and Effects of Plant Protection Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) on Diseases and Insect Pests of Rice#br# [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2021, 23(4): 103-109. |
[2] | YU Fan, FENG Ying, HAN Jian, SHENG Qiang, SUN Liying, LUO Ming, . Screening of Antagonistic Bacteria Against Valsa pyri from Agricultural Plant Jiaosu and Their Control Effects on Pear Canker [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2021, 23(12): 125-135. |
[3] | WANG Wei, LI Yong, WANG Wei, BIAN Xue, LI Xiying*. Anti-disease Effect and Mechanism of Y-S-Y12 Strain Fermentation Mixed with Biomass Pyrolysis Solution on Pepper Anthracnose [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2020, 22(10): 129-138. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||