Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology ›› 2023, Vol. 25 ›› Issue (11): 70-79.DOI: 10.13304/j.nykjdb.2023.0271
• BIOTECHNOLOGY & LIFE SCIENCE • Previous Articles Next Articles
Fan ZHANG(), Hong WANG(
), Xuebing ZHANG, Jianjun CHEN
Received:
2023-04-06
Accepted:
2023-06-14
Online:
2023-11-15
Published:
2023-11-20
Contact:
Hong WANG
通讯作者:
王鸿
作者简介:
张帆 E-mail: zhfan528@163.com;
基金资助:
CLC Number:
Fan ZHANG, Hong WANG, Xuebing ZHANG, Jianjun CHEN. Physiological and Biochemical Responses of Peach Self-rooted Rootstock to NaCl and Analysis of Salt Tolerance Threshold[J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2023, 25(11): 70-79.
张帆, 王鸿, 张雪冰, 陈建军. 桃自根砧对NaCl生理生化响应及耐盐阈值分析[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2023, 25(11): 70-79.
Fig. 1 Contents of MDA, Pro and soluble sugar in leaves of peach self-rooted rootstock under salt stressNote: Different lowercase letters indicate significant differences between different treatments at P<0.05 level.
Fig. 2 Activities of SOD, POD and CAT in leaves of peach self-rooted rootstock under salt stressNote: Different lowercase letters indicate significant differences between different treatments at P<0.05 level.
Fig. 3 Contents of K+, Na+ and Na+/K+ ratio in leaves of peach self-rooted rootstock under salt stressNote: Different lowercase letters indicate significant differences between different treatments at P<0.05 level.
Fig. 4 Contents of chlorophyll a, chlorophyll b, carotenoid and chlorophyll a/b value in leaves of peach self-rooted rootstock under salt stressNote: Different lowercase letters indicate significant differences between different treatments at P<0.05 level.
品种Variety | NaCl含量 NaCl content/% | Fv/Fm | φEo | φRo | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
李1 Li 1 | 0.2 | 0.829±0.011 abc | 1.959±0.331 b | 0.798±0.20 cdef | 1.221±0.168 ab | 0.401±0.035 efg |
0.4 | 0.671±0.032 e | 0.183±0.002 c | 0.195±0.001 ef | 0.898±0.068 bc | 0.459±0.040 ef | |
0.6 | 0.632±0.011 f | 0.008±0.001 c | 0.011±0.000 f | 0.284±0.005 d | 0.464±0.035 e | |
李3 Li 3 | 0.2 | 0.832±0.004 abc | 3.425±0.476 ab | 1.765±0.376 abc | 0.975±0.052 bc | 0.448±0.041 efg |
0.4 | 0.831±0.005 abc | 3.130±0.010 ab | 1.704±0.120 abcd | 1.196±0.041 b | 0.346±0.002 g | |
0.6 | 0.825±0.015 abc | 2.741±1.156 ab | 1.087±0.007 cde | 0.632±0.020 c | 0.503±0.035 de | |
李5 Li 5 | 0.2 | 0.810±0.040 bc | 1.995±0.366 b | 1.582±0.657 bcd | 0.883±0.078 bc | 0.351±0.023 fg |
0.4 | 0.805±0.003 c | 2.196±2.128 b | 0.957±0.999 cdef | 1.149±0.125 b | 0.570±0.113 cd | |
0.6 | 0.723±0.006 d | 2.694±0.621 ab | 0.701±0.139 def | 0.927±0.575 bc | 0.406±0.047 efg | |
RA | 0.2 | 0.838±0.001 ab | 3.417±0.043 ab | 1.532±0.154 bcd | 1.222±0.196 ab | 0.668±0.078 c |
0.4 | 0.834±0.008 ab | 3.241±0.69 ab | 1.508±0.460 bcd | 1.096±0.052 b | 0.624±0.129 c | |
0.6 | 0.832±0.006 ab | 3.125±0.84 ab | 1.471±0.510 bcd | 0.897±0.268 bc | 0.622±0.023 c | |
GF677 | 0.2 | 0.845±0.002 a | 4.364±1.06 a | 2.611±1.200 a | 1.539±0.015 a | 1.557±0.001 a |
0.4 | 0.843±0.007 a | 4.018±0.498 a | 2.125±0.499 ab | 1.159±0.010 b | 1.075±0.007 b | |
0.6 | 0.841±0.003 a | 4.023±0.414 a | 1.784±0.376 abc | 1.111±0.129 b | 0.616±0.083 c |
Table 1 Fast fluorescence kinetic parameters of peach self-rooted rootstock leaves under salt stress
品种Variety | NaCl含量 NaCl content/% | Fv/Fm | φEo | φRo | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
李1 Li 1 | 0.2 | 0.829±0.011 abc | 1.959±0.331 b | 0.798±0.20 cdef | 1.221±0.168 ab | 0.401±0.035 efg |
0.4 | 0.671±0.032 e | 0.183±0.002 c | 0.195±0.001 ef | 0.898±0.068 bc | 0.459±0.040 ef | |
0.6 | 0.632±0.011 f | 0.008±0.001 c | 0.011±0.000 f | 0.284±0.005 d | 0.464±0.035 e | |
李3 Li 3 | 0.2 | 0.832±0.004 abc | 3.425±0.476 ab | 1.765±0.376 abc | 0.975±0.052 bc | 0.448±0.041 efg |
0.4 | 0.831±0.005 abc | 3.130±0.010 ab | 1.704±0.120 abcd | 1.196±0.041 b | 0.346±0.002 g | |
0.6 | 0.825±0.015 abc | 2.741±1.156 ab | 1.087±0.007 cde | 0.632±0.020 c | 0.503±0.035 de | |
李5 Li 5 | 0.2 | 0.810±0.040 bc | 1.995±0.366 b | 1.582±0.657 bcd | 0.883±0.078 bc | 0.351±0.023 fg |
0.4 | 0.805±0.003 c | 2.196±2.128 b | 0.957±0.999 cdef | 1.149±0.125 b | 0.570±0.113 cd | |
0.6 | 0.723±0.006 d | 2.694±0.621 ab | 0.701±0.139 def | 0.927±0.575 bc | 0.406±0.047 efg | |
RA | 0.2 | 0.838±0.001 ab | 3.417±0.043 ab | 1.532±0.154 bcd | 1.222±0.196 ab | 0.668±0.078 c |
0.4 | 0.834±0.008 ab | 3.241±0.69 ab | 1.508±0.460 bcd | 1.096±0.052 b | 0.624±0.129 c | |
0.6 | 0.832±0.006 ab | 3.125±0.84 ab | 1.471±0.510 bcd | 0.897±0.268 bc | 0.622±0.023 c | |
GF677 | 0.2 | 0.845±0.002 a | 4.364±1.06 a | 2.611±1.200 a | 1.539±0.015 a | 1.557±0.001 a |
0.4 | 0.843±0.007 a | 4.018±0.498 a | 2.125±0.499 ab | 1.159±0.010 b | 1.075±0.007 b | |
0.6 | 0.841±0.003 a | 4.023±0.414 a | 1.784±0.376 abc | 1.111±0.129 b | 0.616±0.083 c |
品种Variety | NaCl含量 NaCl content/% | ABC/CSm | TRo/CSm | ETO/CSm | RC/CSm |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
李1 Li 1 | 0.2 | 1 969.00±26.664 ab | 1 479.00±158.072 ab | 746.00±94.000 ab | 275.33±10.682 abc |
0.4 | 1 725.33±5.131 b | 1 433.33±1.527 ab | 696.67±185.403 ab | 201.33±74.865 cde | |
0.6 | 1 705.33±5.231 b | 1 410.67±431.430 ab | 678.67±397.945 ab | 155.33±1.763 e | |
李3 Li 3 | 0.2 | 1 846.67±89.001 ab | 1 674.906±128 ab | 882.67±64.663 ab | 276.50±6.639 abc |
0.4 | 1 961.00±1.000 ab | 1 583.33±0.577 ab | 841.00±61.991 ab | 247.33±0.333 abcd | |
0.6 | 1 846.50±100.500 ab | 1 524.50±110.500 ab | 831.00±73.000 ab | 215.00±23.094 bcde | |
李5 Li 5 | 0.2 | 2 000.00±85.422 ab | 1 654.67±1.527 ab | 772. 00±59.000 ab | 209.00±38.214 bcde |
0.4 | 1 816.33±51.286 ab | 1 510.00±43.863 ab | 707.00±35.552 ab | 183.33±4.484 de | |
0.6 | 1 778.33±106.800 ab | 1 398.67±216.705 abc | 591.33±366.444 b | 148.00±0.577 e | |
RA | 0.2 | 1 903.00±1.000 ab | 1 677.00±87.298 ab | 890.67±7.094 ab | 290.67±27.088 abc |
0.4 | 1 755.67±188.797 ab | 1 658.33±34.789 ab | 823.00±2.000 ab | 280.33±20.177 abc | |
0.6 | 1 896.00±140.000 ab | 1 574.00±136.000 ab | 791. 00±2.000 ab | 275.33±35.025 bcd | |
GF677 | 0.2 | 2 028.67±6.806 a | 1 693.33±7.2342 a | 961.00±1.000 a | 329.33±14.858 a |
0.4 | 1 972.00±48.692 ab | 1 562.50±77.500 ab | 920.33±94.659 a | 321.33±28.309 a | |
0.6 | 1 862.50±78.500 ab | 1 658.33±39.106 ab | 866. 33±4.932 ab | 296.50±17.031 ab |
Table 2 Light energy absorption, capture and transmission of peach self-rooted rootstock leaves under salt stress
品种Variety | NaCl含量 NaCl content/% | ABC/CSm | TRo/CSm | ETO/CSm | RC/CSm |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
李1 Li 1 | 0.2 | 1 969.00±26.664 ab | 1 479.00±158.072 ab | 746.00±94.000 ab | 275.33±10.682 abc |
0.4 | 1 725.33±5.131 b | 1 433.33±1.527 ab | 696.67±185.403 ab | 201.33±74.865 cde | |
0.6 | 1 705.33±5.231 b | 1 410.67±431.430 ab | 678.67±397.945 ab | 155.33±1.763 e | |
李3 Li 3 | 0.2 | 1 846.67±89.001 ab | 1 674.906±128 ab | 882.67±64.663 ab | 276.50±6.639 abc |
0.4 | 1 961.00±1.000 ab | 1 583.33±0.577 ab | 841.00±61.991 ab | 247.33±0.333 abcd | |
0.6 | 1 846.50±100.500 ab | 1 524.50±110.500 ab | 831.00±73.000 ab | 215.00±23.094 bcde | |
李5 Li 5 | 0.2 | 2 000.00±85.422 ab | 1 654.67±1.527 ab | 772. 00±59.000 ab | 209.00±38.214 bcde |
0.4 | 1 816.33±51.286 ab | 1 510.00±43.863 ab | 707.00±35.552 ab | 183.33±4.484 de | |
0.6 | 1 778.33±106.800 ab | 1 398.67±216.705 abc | 591.33±366.444 b | 148.00±0.577 e | |
RA | 0.2 | 1 903.00±1.000 ab | 1 677.00±87.298 ab | 890.67±7.094 ab | 290.67±27.088 abc |
0.4 | 1 755.67±188.797 ab | 1 658.33±34.789 ab | 823.00±2.000 ab | 280.33±20.177 abc | |
0.6 | 1 896.00±140.000 ab | 1 574.00±136.000 ab | 791. 00±2.000 ab | 275.33±35.025 bcd | |
GF677 | 0.2 | 2 028.67±6.806 a | 1 693.33±7.2342 a | 961.00±1.000 a | 329.33±14.858 a |
0.4 | 1 972.00±48.692 ab | 1 562.50±77.500 ab | 920.33±94.659 a | 321.33±28.309 a | |
0.6 | 1 862.50±78.500 ab | 1 658.33±39.106 ab | 866. 33±4.932 ab | 296.50±17.031 ab |
Fig. 6 Tolerance coefficient of leaves in peach self-rooted rootstock under salt stressNote: Different lowercase letters indicate significant differences between different treatments at P<0.05 level.
品 种Variety | 叶绿素Chlorophyll | 丙二醛MDA | 脯氨酸Pro | 可溶性糖Soluble sugar | 超氧化物歧化酶SOD | 过氧化物酶POD | 过氧化氢酶CAT | Na+ | K+ | 均值Mean | 排序Ranking |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
李1 Li 1 | 0.84 | 0.57 | 0.54 | 0.38 | 0.17 | 0.17 | 0.25 | 0.50 | 0.32 | 0.42 | 5 |
李3 Li 3 | 0.91 | 0.39 | 0.61 | 0.34 | 0.44 | 0.44 | 0.50 | 0.68 | 0.27 | 0.51 | 3 |
李5 Li 5 | 0.67 | 0.50 | 0.24 | 0.44 | 0.45 | 0.45 | 0.67 | 0.58 | 0.42 | 0.49 | 4 |
RA | 0.12 | 0.90 | 0.59 | 0.72 | 0.54 | 0.54 | 0.65 | 0.69 | 0.5 | 0.58 | 2 |
GF677 | 0.91 | 0.51 | 0.62 | 0.41 | 0.73 | 0.73 | 0.92 | 0.33 | 0.66 | 0.66 | 1 |
Table 3 Membership analysis of salt resistance indexes of different peach self-rooted rootstock
品 种Variety | 叶绿素Chlorophyll | 丙二醛MDA | 脯氨酸Pro | 可溶性糖Soluble sugar | 超氧化物歧化酶SOD | 过氧化物酶POD | 过氧化氢酶CAT | Na+ | K+ | 均值Mean | 排序Ranking |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
李1 Li 1 | 0.84 | 0.57 | 0.54 | 0.38 | 0.17 | 0.17 | 0.25 | 0.50 | 0.32 | 0.42 | 5 |
李3 Li 3 | 0.91 | 0.39 | 0.61 | 0.34 | 0.44 | 0.44 | 0.50 | 0.68 | 0.27 | 0.51 | 3 |
李5 Li 5 | 0.67 | 0.50 | 0.24 | 0.44 | 0.45 | 0.45 | 0.67 | 0.58 | 0.42 | 0.49 | 4 |
RA | 0.12 | 0.90 | 0.59 | 0.72 | 0.54 | 0.54 | 0.65 | 0.69 | 0.5 | 0.58 | 2 |
GF677 | 0.91 | 0.51 | 0.62 | 0.41 | 0.73 | 0.73 | 0.92 | 0.33 | 0.66 | 0.66 | 1 |
1 | 马翠兰,刘星辉,陈中海.果树对盐胁迫的反应及耐盐性鉴定的研究进展[J].福建农业大学学报,2000(2):161-166. |
MA C L, LIU X H, CHEN Z H. Advances in response of fruit trees to salt stress and their salt-tolerance identification [J]. J. Fujian Agric. For. Univ., 2000(2):161-166. | |
2 | 郭天文,郭全恩,王益权,等.钠盐胁迫对苹果树体内钠累积的影响[J].核农学报,2009,23(2):354-357, 184. |
GUO T W, GUO Q E, WANG Y Q, et al.. Effect of sodic salinity stress on sodium accumulation in trees [J]. J. Nucl. Agric. Sci., 2009, 23(2):354-357, 184. | |
3 | 郁万文,蔡金峰,高长忠.不同桃砧类型对盐胁迫的生理响应及耐盐性评价[J].北方园艺,2016(12):1-6. |
YU W W, CAI J F, GAO C Z. Physiological responsesof different peach rootstocks salt stressand and their salt tolerance evaluation [J]. Northern Hortic., 2016(12):1-6. | |
4 | 张帆,王鸿, 张雪冰,等.干旱胁迫及复水对不同桃自根砧生理特性影响[J].植物生理学报,2022,58(4):767-776. |
ZHANG F, WANG H, ZHANG X B, et al.. ffects of drought stress and rehydration on physiological characteristics of different peach rootstocks [J]. Plant Physiol. J., 2022, 58(4):767-776. | |
5 | 张帆,王鸿.基质和激素对桃砧木GF677硬枝扦插生根的影响[J].林业科技通讯,2018(12):53-56. |
ZHANG F, WANG H. Effects of substrates and hormones on rooting of peach rootstock GF677 hardwood cutting [J]. For. Sci. Tech. Comm., 2018(12):53-56. | |
6 | 宋海岩,陈栋,李靖,等.碱性土上GF677与毛桃叶片叶绿素合成及叶绿体结构差异性研究[J].西南农业学报,2018,31(12):2630-2637. |
SONG H Y, CHEN D, LI J, et al.. Chlorophyll synthesis and chloroplast structure comparison research between GF677 and wild peach on alkaline soil [J]. Southwest China J. Agric. Sci., 2018, 31(12):2630-2637. | |
7 | 朱炜,龚林忠,王富荣,等.5个桃砧木品种对淹水胁迫的生理响应及耐涝性评价[J].南方农业学报,2022,53(10):2937-2945. |
ZHU W, GONG L Z, WANG F R, et al.. Physiological responses and waterlogging tolerance evaluation of five peach rootstock varieties under waterlogging stress [J]. J. Southern Agric., 2022, 53(10):2937-2945. | |
8 | 李合生.植物生理生化实验原理和技术[M].北京:高等教育出版社,2000. |
9 | 杜远鹏,晋学娟,郭淑华,等.不同盐碱类型胁迫对红地球/贝达葡萄植株离子分布的影响[J].应用生态学报,2015,26(6):1801-1806. |
DU Y P, JIN X J, GUO S H, et al.. Effects of different salt alkali types of stress on ion distribution in red globe/beida grape plants [J]. J. Appl. Ecol., 2015, 26(6):1801-1806. | |
10 | 赵天然,车路平,谢会成,等.流苏树对NaCl的生理响应及耐盐阈值分析[J].植物生理学报,2022,58(10):1935-1945. |
ZHAO T R, CHE L P, XIE H C, et al.. Physiological response and salt tolerance threshold analysis of tassel trees to NaCl [J]. Plant Physiol. J., 2022, 58(10):1935-1945. | |
11 | 张瑞,贾旭梅,朱祖雷,等.'烟富六号'苹果在不同砧木上响应盐碱胁迫的光合及生理特性[J].果树学报,2019,36(6):718-728. |
ZHANG R, JIA X M, ZHU Z L, et al.. Photosynthesis and physiological characteristics of ‘Yanfu 6’ apple under saline-alkali stress on different rootstocks [J]. J. Fruit Sci., 2019, 36(6):718-728. | |
12 | 吴强盛,刘琴.果树对盐胁迫的响应和耐盐机制研究进展[J].长江大学学报(自科版),2007(4):9-12, 22. |
WU Q S, LIU Q, Research progress on the response and salt tolerance mechanism of fruit trees to salt stress [J]. J. Changjiang Univ. (Nat. Sci.), 2007(4):9-12, 22. | |
13 | 魏婧,徐畅,李可欣,等.超氧化物歧化酶的研究进展与植物抗逆性[J].植物生理学报,2020,56(12):2571-2584. |
WEI J, XU C, LI K X, et al.. Research progress of superoxide dismutase and plant stressresistance [J]. Plant Physiol. J., 2020, 56(12):2571-2584. | |
14 | ZELM E V, ZHANG Y X, TESTERINK C. Salt tolerance mechanisms of plants [J]. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol., 2020, 71:403-433. |
15 | FRANCISCO G, NICOLAS D, ANA Q, et al.. Transcriptomic analysis reveals salt tolerance mechanisms present in date-plum persimmon rootstock (Diospyros lotus L) [J/OL]. Agronomy, 2020, 10:1703 [2023-03-02]. . |
16 | ANALIA L, MARÍA V P, CLAUDIA V, et al.. Molecular control to salt tolerance mechanisms of woody plants: recent achievements and perspectives [J/OL]. Ann. Forest Sci., 2021, 78:96 [2023-03-02]. . |
17 | 李赵嘉,左永梅,宋明月,等.盐胁迫对大叶蒲公英生长生理指标及耐盐阈值的影响[J].中药材,2020,43(7):1558-1562. |
LI Z J, ZUO Y M, SONG M Y, et al.. Effects of salt stress on physiological indicators and salt tolerance threshold of dandelion growth [J]. Chin. Med. Herbs, 2020, 43(7):1558-1562. |
[1] | Xuemin JIANG, Xiangqian CHEN, Hongyan LI, Qiyan JIANG. Metabolomic Analysis of Wheat Response to Salt Stress [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2023, 25(9): 43-56. |
[2] | Yulu WU, Jiaxin HU, Yuxi CHEN, Bingsong ZHENG, DaoLiang YAN. Effects of External Application of α-Ketoglutarate on Growth, Carbon, Nitrogen and Phosphorus Accumulation and Their Stoichiometric Relationships in Kosteletzkya virginica Under Salt Stress [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2023, 25(7): 170-177. |
[3] | Zhonghua MA, Juan CHEN, Na WU, Benju MAN, Xiaogang WANG, Yongqing ZHE, Jili LIU. Effects of Salt Stress and Phosphorus Supply on Photosynthetic Characteristics and Total Biomass of Switchgrass at Seedling Stage [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2023, 25(6): 190-200. |
[4] | Feng LI, Congpei YIN, Ran YIN, Fan WANG, Yongliang HAN, Zhimin YANG, Jiancheng LIU. Response of Rhizosphere Soil Bacterial Community Diversity to Salt Stress in Oat (Avena sativa L.) [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2023, 25(1): 153-165. |
[5] | Yanling HAO, Wei YAN. Effects of Mixed Salt Stress on Morphological and Physiological Indexes of Ulmus pumila Seedlings [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2022, 24(7): 69-76. |
[6] | Wengyou TIAN, Hao LIU, Chaolin GAN, Liufen WU, Ai LI, Lifang YANG, Ying GAO. Photosynthetic Response and Spectral Characteristics of Cherry Rootstocks Under Salt Stress [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2022, 24(3): 77-83. |
[7] | ZHANG Shengzhen, MA Yanzhi. Effects of CaCl2 on Seed Germination and Seedling Physiological Characteristics of Schizonepeta tenuifolia Briq. under Salt Stress [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2021, 23(7): 65-71. |
[8] | LI Xing, HU Yang, MA Yuan, JIA Shouyi, LI Gangtie. Physiological Response of Tamarix leptostachys Bunge to Three Single Salt Stress [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2021, 23(5): 52-60. |
[9] | GU Huimin1, CHEN Bolang1*, SUN Jin2. Influences of Mycorrhizal Seedling on Growth and Physiological Characteristics of Processing Tomato Under Salt Stress#br# [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2021, 23(3): 166-177. |
[10] | WANG Zhiheng, HUANG Siqi, ZOU Fang, YANG Xiuliu, WEI Yuqing*. Effects of Temperature and NaCl on Seed Germination and Seedling Antioxidant Enzyme Activities of Sweet Sorghum [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2020, 22(9): 42-51. |
[11] | YIN Yonggang, YUAN Junwei, LIU Changjiang, HAN Bin, LI Minmin, SUN Yan, JIA Nan, GUO Zijuan, ZHAO Shengjian*. Effects of NaCl Stress on Leaf Photosynthesis and Chlorophyll Fluorescence Parameters of Vitis sp. Rootstocks [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2020, 22(8): 49-55. |
[12] | YANG Ying1, WANG Yuelin2, YAN Jingqiuzi1, LI Gangtie1*. Effects of Salt Stress on Seed Germination and Seedling Physiological Characteristics of Hemiptelea davidii [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2020, 22(4): 53-60. |
[13] | HU Bo, YAN Wei*, LIU Yu, HAO Yanling. Physiological Characteristics of Three Mulberry #br# Species in Response to Salt Stress [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2020, 22(4): 61-67. |
[14] | ZHANG Xiuyan1,2, XU Miaoyun2, ZHENG Hongyan2, ZOU Junjie2, ZHANG Xiaoyu1*, WANG Lei2*. Analysis of miRNA Expression Profiles in Rice Under Salt Stress [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2020, 22(12): 10-19. |
[15] | YAN Jingqiuzi1, LI Gangtie1*, WANG Yuelin2, MA Yunxia1, YANG Ying1. Effects of Salt Stress on Seed Germination and Seedling Physiological Characteristics of Morus mongolica [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2020, 22(1): 28-37. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||