Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology ›› 2023, Vol. 25 ›› Issue (6): 190-200.DOI: 10.13304/j.nykjdb.2021.0887
• BIO-MANUFACTURING & RESOURCE AND ECOLOGY • Previous Articles
Zhonghua MA1(), Juan CHEN1, Na WU1, Benju MAN1, Xiaogang WANG1, Yongqing ZHE1, Jili LIU2()
Received:
2021-10-17
Accepted:
2022-01-18
Online:
2023-06-01
Published:
2023-07-28
Contact:
Jili LIU
麻仲花1(), 陈娟1, 吴娜1, 满本菊1, 王晓港1, 者永清1, 刘吉利2()
通讯作者:
刘吉利
作者简介:
麻仲花 E-mail:2504075822@qq.com;
基金资助:
CLC Number:
Zhonghua MA, Juan CHEN, Na WU, Benju MAN, Xiaogang WANG, Yongqing ZHE, Jili LIU. Effects of Salt Stress and Phosphorus Supply on Photosynthetic Characteristics and Total Biomass of Switchgrass at Seedling Stage[J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2023, 25(6): 190-200.
麻仲花, 陈娟, 吴娜, 满本菊, 王晓港, 者永清, 刘吉利. 盐胁迫与供磷水平对柳枝稷苗期光合特性与总生物量的影响[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2023, 25(6): 190-200.
品种Variety | 生态类型Ecotype | 染色体倍数Ploidy | 来源Origin |
---|---|---|---|
Alamo | 低地Lowland | 四倍体Tetraploid | 德克萨斯州南部28° N Southern Texas 28° N |
八倍体Alamo Octoploid Alamo | 低地Lowland | 八倍体Octoploid | Alamo (秋水仙素人工加倍) Alamo (Artificial doubling of colchicine) |
Pathfinder | 高地Upland | 八倍体Octoploid | 堪萨斯州40° N Kansas 40° N |
Table 1 Ecological type and chromosome doubling and origin of switchgrass material
品种Variety | 生态类型Ecotype | 染色体倍数Ploidy | 来源Origin |
---|---|---|---|
Alamo | 低地Lowland | 四倍体Tetraploid | 德克萨斯州南部28° N Southern Texas 28° N |
八倍体Alamo Octoploid Alamo | 低地Lowland | 八倍体Octoploid | Alamo (秋水仙素人工加倍) Alamo (Artificial doubling of colchicine) |
Pathfinder | 高地Upland | 八倍体Octoploid | 堪萨斯州40° N Kansas 40° N |
成分Component | 含量Content/(mol·L-1) | 加入量Volume/mL | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
母液Mother liquor | 溶液Solution | B1 | B2 | B3 | B4 | |
Ca(NO3)2·4H2O | 5.000 0 | 5.000 0 | 1.000 0 | 1.000 0 | 1.000 0 | 1.000 0 |
KNO3 | 2.500 0 | 5.000 0 | 2.000 0 | 2.000 0 | 2.000 0 | 2.000 0 |
MgSO4·7H2O | 2.500 0 | 2.500 0 | 1.000 0 | 1.000 0 | 1.000 0 | 1.000 0 |
KH2PO4 | 1.000 0 | 2.000 0 | 0.005 0 | 0.200 0 | 2.000 0 | |
NaH2PO4 | 2.000 0 | |||||
NaNO3 | 5.000 0 | |||||
MgCl2 | 2.500 0 | |||||
NaSO4 | 2.500 0 | |||||
CaCl2 | 5.000 0 | |||||
KCL | 2.500 0 | 5.000 0 | 0.800 0 | 0.798 0 | 0.720 0 | |
EDTA-FeNa | 0.200 0 | 0.020 0 | 0.100 0 | 0.100 0 | 0.100 0 | 0.100 0 |
MnSO4·H2O | 0.672 2 | 0.006 7 | 0.100 0 | 0.100 0 | 0.100 0 | 0.100 0 |
CuSO4·5H2O | 0.003 2 | 0.000 3 | 0.100 0 | 0.100 0 | 0.100 0 | 0.100 0 |
Table 2 Hoagland nutrient solution configuration table with different phosphorus levels
成分Component | 含量Content/(mol·L-1) | 加入量Volume/mL | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
母液Mother liquor | 溶液Solution | B1 | B2 | B3 | B4 | |
Ca(NO3)2·4H2O | 5.000 0 | 5.000 0 | 1.000 0 | 1.000 0 | 1.000 0 | 1.000 0 |
KNO3 | 2.500 0 | 5.000 0 | 2.000 0 | 2.000 0 | 2.000 0 | 2.000 0 |
MgSO4·7H2O | 2.500 0 | 2.500 0 | 1.000 0 | 1.000 0 | 1.000 0 | 1.000 0 |
KH2PO4 | 1.000 0 | 2.000 0 | 0.005 0 | 0.200 0 | 2.000 0 | |
NaH2PO4 | 2.000 0 | |||||
NaNO3 | 5.000 0 | |||||
MgCl2 | 2.500 0 | |||||
NaSO4 | 2.500 0 | |||||
CaCl2 | 5.000 0 | |||||
KCL | 2.500 0 | 5.000 0 | 0.800 0 | 0.798 0 | 0.720 0 | |
EDTA-FeNa | 0.200 0 | 0.020 0 | 0.100 0 | 0.100 0 | 0.100 0 | 0.100 0 |
MnSO4·H2O | 0.672 2 | 0.006 7 | 0.100 0 | 0.100 0 | 0.100 0 | 0.100 0 |
CuSO4·5H2O | 0.003 2 | 0.000 3 | 0.100 0 | 0.100 0 | 0.100 0 | 0.100 0 |
Fig. 1 Chlorophyll content of 3 switchgrass varieties under different salt stress and phosphorus supplyNote: Different lowercase letters indicate significant differences between different phosphorus levels of same variety under same salt treatment at P<0.05 level.
处理Treatment | 八倍体Alamo Octoploid Alamo | Alamo | Pathfinder |
---|---|---|---|
FA | 0.127 3 | 0.026 6* | 0.003 0* |
FB | 0.175 0 | 0.055 5 | 0.009 0* |
FA×B | 0.000 4* | 0.003 2* | 0.899 8 |
Table 3 Analysis of variance of chlorophyll content
处理Treatment | 八倍体Alamo Octoploid Alamo | Alamo | Pathfinder |
---|---|---|---|
FA | 0.127 3 | 0.026 6* | 0.003 0* |
FB | 0.175 0 | 0.055 5 | 0.009 0* |
FA×B | 0.000 4* | 0.003 2* | 0.899 8 |
Fig. 2 Pn of 3 switchgrass varieties under different salt stress and phosphorus supply levelsNote: Different lowercase letters indicate significant differences between different phosphorus levels of same variety under same salt treatment at P<0.05 level.
处理Treatment | 八倍体Alamo Octoploid Alamo | Alamo | Pathfinder |
---|---|---|---|
FA | 0.018 7* | 0.001 2* | 0.000 2* |
FB | 0.092 6 | 0.012 3* | 0.002 0* |
FA×B | 0.058 4 | 0.843 4 | 0.963 6 |
Table 4 Analysis of variance of Pn
处理Treatment | 八倍体Alamo Octoploid Alamo | Alamo | Pathfinder |
---|---|---|---|
FA | 0.018 7* | 0.001 2* | 0.000 2* |
FB | 0.092 6 | 0.012 3* | 0.002 0* |
FA×B | 0.058 4 | 0.843 4 | 0.963 6 |
Fig. 3 Gs of 3 switchgrass varieties under different salt stress and phosphorus supply levelsNote: Different lowercase letters indicate significant differences between different phosphorus levels of same variety under same salt treatment at P<0.05 level.
处理Treatment | 八倍体Alamo Octoploid Alamo | Alamo | Pathfinder |
---|---|---|---|
FA | 0.009 6* | 0.000 4* | 0.000 8* |
FB | 0.071 3 | 0.053 4 | 0.017 5* |
FA×B | 0.182 6 | 0.024 5* | 0.440 0 |
Table 5 Analysis of variance of Gs
处理Treatment | 八倍体Alamo Octoploid Alamo | Alamo | Pathfinder |
---|---|---|---|
FA | 0.009 6* | 0.000 4* | 0.000 8* |
FB | 0.071 3 | 0.053 4 | 0.017 5* |
FA×B | 0.182 6 | 0.024 5* | 0.440 0 |
Fig. 4 Ci of 3 switchgrass varieties under different salt stress and phosphorus supply levelNote: Different lowercase letters indicate significant differences between different phosphorus levels of same variety under same salt treatment at P<0.05 level.
处理Treatment | 八倍体Alamo Octoploid Alamo | Alamo | Pathfinder |
---|---|---|---|
FA | 0.004 7* | 0.002 8* | 0.001 6* |
FB | 0.237 0 | 0.175 1 | 0.025 9* |
FA×B | 0.002 6* | 0.000 0* | 0.007 9* |
Table 6 Analysis of variance of Ci
处理Treatment | 八倍体Alamo Octoploid Alamo | Alamo | Pathfinder |
---|---|---|---|
FA | 0.004 7* | 0.002 8* | 0.001 6* |
FB | 0.237 0 | 0.175 1 | 0.025 9* |
FA×B | 0.002 6* | 0.000 0* | 0.007 9* |
Fig. 5 Tr of 3 switchgrass varieties under different salt stress and phosphorus supply levelNote: Different lowercase letters indicate significant differences between different phosphorus levels of same variety under same salt treatment at P<0.05 level.
处理Treatment | 八倍体Alamo Octoploid Alamo | Alamo | Pathfinder |
---|---|---|---|
FA | 0.000 3* | 0.000 7* | 0.000 7* |
FB | 0.016 9* | 0.135 6 | 0.026 4* |
FA×B | 0.577 1 | 0.009 9* | 0.039 9* |
Table 7 Analysis of variance of Tr
处理Treatment | 八倍体Alamo Octoploid Alamo | Alamo | Pathfinder |
---|---|---|---|
FA | 0.000 3* | 0.000 7* | 0.000 7* |
FB | 0.016 9* | 0.135 6 | 0.026 4* |
FA×B | 0.577 1 | 0.009 9* | 0.039 9* |
Fig. 6 Biomass of 3 switchgrass varieties under different salt stress and phosphorus supply levelsNote: Different lowercase letters indicate significant differences between different phosphorus levels of same variety under same salt treatment at P<0.05 level.
处理Treatment | 八倍体Alamo Octoploid Alamo | Alamo | Pathfinder |
---|---|---|---|
FA | 0.027 8* | 0.006 3* | 0.012 3* |
FB | 0.311 3 | 0.130 6 | 0.123 9 |
FA×B | 0.000 1* | 0.000 0* | 0.000 0* |
Table 8 Analysis of variance of total biomass
处理Treatment | 八倍体Alamo Octoploid Alamo | Alamo | Pathfinder |
---|---|---|---|
FA | 0.027 8* | 0.006 3* | 0.012 3* |
FB | 0.311 3 | 0.130 6 | 0.123 9 |
FA×B | 0.000 1* | 0.000 0* | 0.000 0* |
品种Variety | 指标Index | 总生物量 Total biomass | 叶绿素含量 Chlorophyll content | 蒸腾速率Tr | 胞间CO2浓度Ci | 气孔导度Gs |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
八倍体Alamo Octoploid Alamo | 叶绿素含量Chlorophyll content | 0.61 | ||||
蒸腾速率Tr | 0.88** | 0.70 | ||||
胞间CO2浓度Ci | -0.83* | -0.75* | -0.98 | |||
气孔导度Gs | 0.85** | 0.81* | 0.94 | -0.93 | ||
净光合速率Pn | 0.89** | 0.73* | 0.89** | -0.83* | 0.90** | |
Alamo | 叶绿素含量Chlorophyll content | 0.86** | ||||
蒸腾速率Tr | 0.96 | 0.76* | ||||
胞间CO2浓度Ci | -0.92** | -0.83* | -0.95** | |||
气孔导度Gs | 0.95 | 0.81* | 0.98** | -0.99 | ||
净光合速率Pn | 0.94 | 0.90** | 0.90** | -0.91** | 0.93** | |
Pathfinder | 叶绿素含量Chlorophyll content | 0.94 | ||||
蒸腾速率Tr | 0.97 | 0.92** | ||||
胞间CO2浓度Ci | -0.93 | -0.92** | -0.97 | |||
气孔导度Gs | 0.97 | 0.96 | 0.98 | -0.97 | ||
净光合速率Pn | 0.96 | 0.97 | 0.98 | -0.98 | 0.99 |
Table 9 Correlation analysis of total biomass and photosynthetic characteristics of 3 switchgrass varieties at different seedling stage
品种Variety | 指标Index | 总生物量 Total biomass | 叶绿素含量 Chlorophyll content | 蒸腾速率Tr | 胞间CO2浓度Ci | 气孔导度Gs |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
八倍体Alamo Octoploid Alamo | 叶绿素含量Chlorophyll content | 0.61 | ||||
蒸腾速率Tr | 0.88** | 0.70 | ||||
胞间CO2浓度Ci | -0.83* | -0.75* | -0.98 | |||
气孔导度Gs | 0.85** | 0.81* | 0.94 | -0.93 | ||
净光合速率Pn | 0.89** | 0.73* | 0.89** | -0.83* | 0.90** | |
Alamo | 叶绿素含量Chlorophyll content | 0.86** | ||||
蒸腾速率Tr | 0.96 | 0.76* | ||||
胞间CO2浓度Ci | -0.92** | -0.83* | -0.95** | |||
气孔导度Gs | 0.95 | 0.81* | 0.98** | -0.99 | ||
净光合速率Pn | 0.94 | 0.90** | 0.90** | -0.91** | 0.93** | |
Pathfinder | 叶绿素含量Chlorophyll content | 0.94 | ||||
蒸腾速率Tr | 0.97 | 0.92** | ||||
胞间CO2浓度Ci | -0.93 | -0.92** | -0.97 | |||
气孔导度Gs | 0.97 | 0.96 | 0.98 | -0.97 | ||
净光合速率Pn | 0.96 | 0.97 | 0.98 | -0.98 | 0.99 |
品种Variety | 总生物量 Total biomass | 叶绿素含量 Chlorophyll content | 蒸腾速率 Tr | 胞间CO2浓 度Ci | 气孔导度Gs | 净光合速率Pn | 均值 Mean | 排序 Ranking |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
八倍体Alamo Octoploid Alamo | 0.36 | 0.57 | 0.40 | 0.49 | 0.76 | 0.40 | 0.50 | 1 |
Alamo | 0.43 | 0.57 | 0.40 | 0.45 | 0.52 | 0.44 | 0.47 | 2 |
Pathfinder | 0.39 | 0.40 | 0.47 | 0.44 | 0.47 | 0.49 | 0.44 | 3 |
Table 10 Membership function values ??of photosynthetic characteristics and total biomass of 3 switchgrass varieties at seedling stage
品种Variety | 总生物量 Total biomass | 叶绿素含量 Chlorophyll content | 蒸腾速率 Tr | 胞间CO2浓 度Ci | 气孔导度Gs | 净光合速率Pn | 均值 Mean | 排序 Ranking |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
八倍体Alamo Octoploid Alamo | 0.36 | 0.57 | 0.40 | 0.49 | 0.76 | 0.40 | 0.50 | 1 |
Alamo | 0.43 | 0.57 | 0.40 | 0.45 | 0.52 | 0.44 | 0.47 | 2 |
Pathfinder | 0.39 | 0.40 | 0.47 | 0.44 | 0.47 | 0.49 | 0.44 | 3 |
1 | 刘吉利, 常雯雯, 张永乾, 等. 盐碱地不同柳枝稷品种的生理特性[J]. 草业科学, 2018, 35(11): 2641-2649. |
LIU J L, CHANG W W, ZHANG Y Q, et al.. Comparison of physiological characteristics of different switchgrass varieties in saline-alkali land [J]. Pratac. Sci., 2018, 35(11): 2641-2649. | |
2 | 田志杰, 李景鹏, 杨福, 非生物胁迫下作物磷素利用研究进展 [J]. 生态学杂志, 2017, 36(8): 2336-2342. |
TIAN Z J, LI J P, YANG F. Research progress in crop phosphorus utilization under abiotic stress [J]. J. Ecol., 2017, 36(8): 2336-2342. | |
3 | 邓力群, 刘兆普, 程爱武, 等. 不同盐分滨海盐土上油葵(G1012B)的氮磷肥效应研究[J]. 中国油料作物学报, 2002, 24(4): 35-41. |
DENG L Q, LIU Z P, CHENG A W, et al.. Study on nitrogen and phosphorus fertilizer effects of oil sunflower (G1012B) on coastal saline soil with different salinity [J]. Chin. J. Oil Crop Sci., 2002, 24(4): 35-41. | |
4 | 黄高鉴, 王斌, 杨治平, 等. 盐胁迫对柳枝稷生物量及品质的影响[J]. 天津科技, 2019, 46(2): 26-28. |
HUANG G J, WANG B, YANG Z P, et al.. The effect of salt stress on switchgrass biomass and quality [J]. Tianjin Sci. Technol., 2019, 46 (2): 26-28. | |
5 | 常雯雯, 刘吉利, 吴娜, 等. 西北盐碱地区不同柳枝稷品种光合特性与产量比较[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2019, 31(10): 1647-1654. |
CHANG W W, LIU J L, WU N, et al.. Comparison of photosynthetic characteristics and yield of different switchgrass varieties in saline-alkali areas in Northwestern China [J]. J. Zhejiang. Agric., 2019, 31(10): 1647-1654. | |
6 | 刘金彪, 王世琪, 康继月. 水磷供应对柳枝稷和达乌里胡枝子生物量、水分利用效率及种间关系的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2019, 27(6): 1007-0435. |
LIU J B, WANG S Q, KANG J Y. The effect of water and phosphorus supply on the biomass, water use efficiency and interspecific relationships of switchgrass and Lespedeza daurie [J]. Acta. Agrestia Sin., 2019, 27(6):1007-0435. | |
7 | 张蕊, 张富平, 郝艳丽. 水分胁迫条件下磷素营养对小麦抗旱性影响的研究进展[J]. 安徽农业科学, 2007, 35(11): 3313-3314, 3316. |
ZHANG R, ZHANG F P, HAO Y L. Research progress on the effect of phosphorus nutrition on wheat drought resistance under water stress [J]. J. Anhui Agric. Sci., 2007, 35(11): 3313-3314, 3316. | |
8 | 朱毅, 范希峰, 侯新村, 等. 中性盐胁迫对柳枝稷苗期生长和生理特性的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2015, 23(2): 1007-1015. |
ZHU Y, FAN X F, HOU X C, et al.. Effects of neutral salt stress on the growth and physiological characteristics of switchgrass seedlings [J]. Acta Agrestia Sin., 2015, 23(2): 1007-1015. | |
9 | 韩瑞宏, 卢欣石, 高桂娟, 等. 紫花苜蓿抗旱性主成分及隶属函数分析[J]. 草地学报, 2006, 14(2): 142-146. |
HAN R H, LU X S, GAO G J, et al.. Analysis of the principal components and membership functions of alfalfa drought resistance [J]. Acta Agrestia Sin., 2006, 14(2): 142-146. | |
10 | 萧浪涛. 植物生理学[M]. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2008: 124-156. |
XIAO L G. Plant Physiology [M]. Beijing: China Agriculture Press, 2008:124-156. | |
11 | 郑殿君, 张治安, 姜丽艳, 等. 不同产量水平大豆叶片净光合速率的比较[J]. 东北农业大学学报, 2010, 41(9): 1-5. |
ZHENG D J, ZHANG Z A, JIANG L Y, et al.. Comparison of net photosynthetic rate of soybean leaves at different yield levels [J]. J. Northeast Agric. Univ., 2010, 41(9): 1-5. | |
12 | 王继安, 宁海龙, 罗秋香, 等. 大豆种间叶绿素含量、RUBP活性、希尔反应活力及其与产量间的关系[J]. 东北农业大学学报, 2004, 35(2): 129-134. |
WANG J A, NING H L, LUO Q X, et al.. Soybean interspecific chlorophyll content, RUBP activity, hill reaction activity and their relationship with yield [J]. J. Notheast Agric. Univ., 2004, 35(2): 129-134. | |
13 | 张璐颖, 文笑, 林勇明, 等. 盐胁迫对台湾桤木幼苗光合作用和荧光特性的影响[J]. 福建林学院学报, 2013, 33(3):193-199. |
ZHANG L Y, WEN X, LIN Y M, et al.. The effect of salt stress on photosynthesis and fluorescence characteristics of Alnus taiwanensis seedlings [J]. J. Fujian For. Coll., 2013, 33(3):193-199. | |
14 | 张文明, 巢建国, 谷巍, 等. 酸雨胁迫下茅苍术的光合及生理响应[J]. 南方农业学报, 2017, 48(7): 1167-1172. |
ZHANG W M, CHAO J G, GU W, et al.. Photosynthetic and physiological response of Atractylodes lanceolata under acid rain stress [J]. J. Southern Agric., 2017, 48(7):1167-1172. | |
15 | 李学孚, 倪智敏, 吴月燕, 等. 盐胁迫对"鄞红"葡萄光合特性及叶片细胞结构的影响[J]. 生态学报, 2015, 35(13): 4436-4444. |
LI X F, NI Z M, WU Y Y, et al.. Effects of salt stress on photosynthetic characteristics and leaf cell structure of “Yinhong” grape [J]. Acta Ecol. Sin., 2015, 35(13):4436-4444. | |
16 | 孙云飞, 张文明, 巢建国, 等. 盐胁迫对茅苍术叶绿素含量及叶绿素荧光参数的影响[J]. 江苏农业科学, 2020, 48(4): 146-149. |
SUN Y F, ZHANG W M, CHAO J G, et al.. The effect of salt stress on the chlorophyll content and chlorophyll fluorescence parameters of Atractylodes lanceolata [J]. Jiangsu. Agric. Sci., 2020, 48(4):146-149. | |
17 | YU M M, CHEN Y H, ZHU Z B, et al.. Effect of phosphorus supply on plant productivity, photosynthetic efficiency and bioactive-component production in Prunella vulgaris L. under hydroponic condition [J]. J. Plant. Nutr., 2016, 39(12): 1672-1680. |
18 | 王艺, 韦小丽. 不同光照对植物生长、生理生化和形态结构影响的研究进展[J]. 山地农业生物学报, 2010, 29(4): 353-359. |
WANG Y, WEI X L. Advance on the effects of different light envrironments on growth physiological biochemistry and morphostructure of plant [J]. J. Mountain Agric. Biol., 2010, 29(4):353-359. | |
19 | 叶子飘, 于强. 植物气孔导度的机理模型[J]. 植物生态学报, 2009, 33(4): 772-778. |
YE Z P, YU Q. Mechanism model of plant stomatal conductance [J]. J. Plant Ecol., 2009, 33(4): 772-778. | |
20 | 李六林, 杨佩芳, 田彩芳, 等. 树莓光合特性的研究[J]. 园艺学报, 2003, 30(3): 314-316. |
LI L L, YANG P F, TIAN C F, et al.. Research on the photosynthetic characteristics of raspberry [J]. Acta Hortic. Sin., 2003, 30(3):314-316. | |
21 | 刘群龙, 宁婵娟, 王朵, 等. 翅果油树净光合速率日变化及其主要影响因子[J].中国生态农业学报, 2009, 17(3): 474-478. |
LIU Q L, NING C J, WANG D, et al.. Diurnal changes of the net photosynthetic rate of Elaeagnus serrata and its main influencing factors [J]. J. Ecol. Agric., 2009, 17(3): 474-478. | |
22 | 张兆斌. CO2、温度升高对柿幼树光合作用及水分利用效率影响的研究[D]. 泰安: 山东农业大学, 2009. |
ZHANG Z B. The effect of CO2 and temperature increase on the photosynthesis and water use efficiency of young persimmon trees [D]. Tai’an: Shandong Agricultural University, 2009. | |
23 | 叶菊, 蔺海明, 邱黛玉, 等. 几种甘草(Glycyrrhiza)光合特性、形态特征及生物量比较[J]. 中国沙漠, 2014, 34(2): 456-463. |
YE J, LIN H M, QIU D Y, et al.. Comparison of photosynthetic characteristics, morphological characteristics and biomass of several licorice (Glycyrrhiza) [J]. J. Desert. Res., 2014, 34(2):456-463. | |
24 | 胡煜雯, 巢建国, 陆奇杰, 等. 茅苍术对不同供磷水平的光合及生理响应[J]. 黑龙江农业科学, 2018(12): 20-24. |
HU Y W, CHAO J G, LU Q J, et al.. The photosynthetic and physiological response of Atractylodes lanceolata to different levels of phosphorus supply [J]. Heilongjiang Agric. Sci., 2018(12): 20-24. | |
25 | 杨洋, 王亚娟, 阴法庭, 等. 盐碱胁迫对油菜苗期生理及光合特性的影响[J]. 北方园艺, 2020 (15): 1-8. |
YANG Y, WANG Y J, YIN F T, et al.. The effect of saline-alkali stress on the physiological and photosynthetic characteristics of rape seedlings [J]. Northern Hortic., 2020 (15): 1-8. | |
26 | 姜宗庆, 李成忠, 汤庚国. 薄壳山核桃光合生理特性对磷素响应的研究[J]. 北方园艺, 2018(1): 19-22. |
JIANG Z Q, LI C Z, TANG G G. Study on the response of photosynthetic physiological characteristics of hickory hickory to phosphorus [J]. Northern Hortic., 2018(1): 19-22. | |
27 | 李进, 段婷婷, 郑超, 等. 不同供磷水平下2个甘蔗品种的光合作用及生长特征[J].热带作物学报, 2019, 40(6): 1108-1114. |
LI J, DUAN T T, ZHENG C, et al.. Photosynthesis and growth characteristics of two sugarcane varieties under different phosphorus supply levels [J]. J. Tropical Crops, 2019, 40(6):1108-1114. | |
28 | 陈永亮, 李修岭, 周晓燕, 等. 低磷胁迫对落叶松幼苗生长及根系酸性磷酸酶活性的影响[J]. 北京林业大学学报, 2006, 28(6): 46-50. |
CHEN Y L, LI X L, ZHOU X Y, et al.. Effects of low phosphorus stress on the growth and root acid phosphatase activity of larch seedlings [J]. J. Beijing For. Univ., 2006, 28(6):46-50. |
[1] | Chen CHEN, Ke SHI, Changwei ZHU, Guiying JIANG, Lan LUO, Weiwei MENG, Fang LIU, Fengmin SHEN, Shiliang LIU. Effects of Planting Density and Nitrogen Application Rate on Wheat Photosynthetic Characteristics, Yield, and Soil Nitrogen Content in Fluvo-aquic Soil in Northern Henan Province [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2023, 25(5): 24-33. |
[2] | Daokuan BAI, Baojian GUO, Yi HONG, Mengna ZHANG, Juan ZHU, Chao LYU, Feifei WANG, Rugen XU. Research on Mutagenic Mechanism and Genetic Mechanism of a Yellowing Mutant in Barley [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2023, 25(5): 34-45. |
[3] | Zhixiong HOU, Changqing JING, Gongxin WANG, Wenzhang GUO, Weikang ZHAO. Temporal and Spatial Variation of Natural Grassland Vegetation Coverage and Its Relationship with Meteorological Factors in Northern Xinjiang from 1998 to 2018 [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2023, 25(2): 140-151. |
[4] | Xin LUO, Yuekai WU, Niannian ZHANG, Jie XU, Zaihua YANG. Composition and Diversity of Fungal Community in Rhizosphere Soil of Camellia Oleifera [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2023, 25(2): 199-210. |
[5] | Feng LI, Congpei YIN, Ran YIN, Fan WANG, Yongliang HAN, Zhimin YANG, Jiancheng LIU. Response of Rhizosphere Soil Bacterial Community Diversity to Salt Stress in Oat (Avena sativa L.) [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2023, 25(1): 153-165. |
[6] | Yanling HAO, Wei YAN. Effects of Mixed Salt Stress on Morphological and Physiological Indexes of Ulmus pumila Seedlings [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2022, 24(7): 69-76. |
[7] | Tongmei GAO, Feng LI, Xiaoyu SU, Dongyong WANG, Yuan TIAN, Pengyu ZHANG, Tongke LI, Zihao YANG, Shuangling WEI. Effect of Nitrogen Reduction on Agronomic Trait, Photosynthetic Characteristics and Yield of Sesame [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2022, 24(6): 176-188. |
[8] | Xin WANG, Yuxia ZHANG, Weidong CHEN, Congying LIN, Wenhui HOU, Guleng SIRI, Baiming CONG. Effects of Nitrogen Topdressing on Yield and Photosynthetic Fluorescence Characteristics of Different Forage Oat Varieties [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2022, 24(5): 170-179. |
[9] | Fangling WANG, Mingyue ZHANG, Yaru ZHOU, Qinglin GUAN, Xinyan LI, Qiu ZHONG, Mingqin ZHAO. Effect of TS-PAA Water Retaining Agent on Growth and Photosynthetic Characteristics of Cigar under Drought Stress [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2022, 24(4): 162-172. |
[10] | Peng ZHONG, Lili MIAO, Jie LIU, Jianli WANG, Haiyan LU, Hongjiu YU, Nan ZHANG. Effect of Different Planting Densities and Patterns on Population Structure and Yield of Cyperusesculentus [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2022, 24(3): 186-196. |
[11] | Wengyou TIAN, Hao LIU, Chaolin GAN, Liufen WU, Ai LI, Lifang YANG, Ying GAO. Photosynthetic Response and Spectral Characteristics of Cherry Rootstocks Under Salt Stress [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2022, 24(3): 77-83. |
[12] | Zhidan WANG, Jili LIU, Na WU. Effects of Fenlong Tillage on Photosynthetic Physiological Characteristics and Yield of Sweet Sorghum [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2022, 24(1): 148-156. |
[13] | ZHANG Shengzhen, MA Yanzhi. Effects of CaCl2 on Seed Germination and Seedling Physiological Characteristics of Schizonepeta tenuifolia Briq. under Salt Stress [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2021, 23(7): 65-71. |
[14] | LI Xing, HU Yang, MA Yuan, JIA Shouyi, LI Gangtie. Physiological Response of Tamarix leptostachys Bunge to Three Single Salt Stress [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2021, 23(5): 52-60. |
[15] | CHEN Jun, ZHANG Qi, YANG Mengyu, YUAN Zhenyang. Impacts of Orchard Herbage-mulching on Photosynthetic Characteristics and Leaf Quality of Apples in Arid Desert Area [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2021, 23(5): 160-167. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||