Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology ›› 2022, Vol. 24 ›› Issue (6): 176-188.DOI: 10.13304/j.nykjdb.2021.0944
• BIO-MANUFACTURING & RESOURCE AND ECOLOGY • Previous Articles
Tongmei GAO1(), Feng LI1, Xiaoyu SU1, Dongyong WANG1, Yuan TIAN1, Pengyu ZHANG1, Tongke LI2, Zihao YANG2, Shuangling WEI1()
Received:
2021-11-04
Accepted:
2022-01-18
Online:
2022-06-15
Published:
2022-06-21
Contact:
Shuangling WEI
高桐梅1(), 李丰1, 苏小雨1, 王东勇1, 田媛1, 张鹏钰1, 李同科2, 杨自豪2, 卫双玲1()
通讯作者:
卫双玲
作者简介:
高桐梅 E-mail:gaotongmei@126.com;
基金资助:
CLC Number:
Tongmei GAO, Feng LI, Xiaoyu SU, Dongyong WANG, Yuan TIAN, Pengyu ZHANG, Tongke LI, Zihao YANG, Shuangling WEI. Effect of Nitrogen Reduction on Agronomic Trait, Photosynthetic Characteristics and Yield of Sesame[J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2022, 24(6): 176-188.
高桐梅, 李丰, 苏小雨, 王东勇, 田媛, 张鹏钰, 李同科, 杨自豪, 卫双玲. 减施氮肥对芝麻农艺性状、光合特性及产量的影响[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2022, 24(6): 176-188.
处理 Treatment | 株高 Plant height/cm | 结蒴部位高度 First capsule height/cm | 黄稍尖长度 Yellow apex length/cm | 主茎果轴长度 Capsule axis length/cm | 单株蒴数 I.e.capsules per plant | 单蒴粒数 I.e.seeds per capsule | 千粒重 1 000-seed weight/g |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
N0 | 160.4±2.80 c | 53.3±2.41 c | 4.1±0.06 b | 103.0±0.42 c | 71.8±2.26 b | 63.1±0.91 b | 2.7±0.15 a |
N1 | 179.0±0.16 b | 58.3±1.44 c | 3.9±0.31 b | 116.8±1.22 a | 92.5±3.45 a | 68.2±1.50 a | 3.0±0.06 a |
N2 | 190.8±1.05 a | 68.5±0.98 b | 4.2±0.12 b | 118.0±0.31 a | 96.6±2.15 a | 67.4±1.58 a | 3.0±0.06 a |
N3 | 189.2±2.84 a | 74.0±2.40 a | 5.4±0.40 a | 109.8±3.14 b | 92.0±2.96 a | 67.0±0.60 a | 2.8±0.06 a |
Table 1 Agronomic trait and yield component of sesame under different nitrogen treatments
处理 Treatment | 株高 Plant height/cm | 结蒴部位高度 First capsule height/cm | 黄稍尖长度 Yellow apex length/cm | 主茎果轴长度 Capsule axis length/cm | 单株蒴数 I.e.capsules per plant | 单蒴粒数 I.e.seeds per capsule | 千粒重 1 000-seed weight/g |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
N0 | 160.4±2.80 c | 53.3±2.41 c | 4.1±0.06 b | 103.0±0.42 c | 71.8±2.26 b | 63.1±0.91 b | 2.7±0.15 a |
N1 | 179.0±0.16 b | 58.3±1.44 c | 3.9±0.31 b | 116.8±1.22 a | 92.5±3.45 a | 68.2±1.50 a | 3.0±0.06 a |
N2 | 190.8±1.05 a | 68.5±0.98 b | 4.2±0.12 b | 118.0±0.31 a | 96.6±2.15 a | 67.4±1.58 a | 3.0±0.06 a |
N3 | 189.2±2.84 a | 74.0±2.40 a | 5.4±0.40 a | 109.8±3.14 b | 92.0±2.96 a | 67.0±0.60 a | 2.8±0.06 a |
处理 Treatment | 根干重 Root dry matter/g | 茎干重 Stem dry matter/g | 叶干重 Leaf dry matter/g | 蒴果皮干重 Capsule peel dry matter/g | 单株产量 Yield per plant/g | 总干物质重 Total dry matter /g | 粒蒴比 Seeds capsule ratio/% |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
N0 | 5.4±0.31 b | 18.8±0.85 c | 7.4±0.78 b | 11.7±0.40 b | 8.2±0.20 c | 54.1±1.40 b | 41.9±0.26 b |
N1 | 6.7±0.23 a | 22.5±0.70 bc | 9.0±0.59 b | 15.7±0.44 a | 13.8±1.19 a | 67.7±3.00 a | 46.8±1.50 a |
N2 | 6.7±0.42 a | 25.2±1.14 ab | 9.2±1.00 ab | 16.2±0.62 a | 13.7±0.96 ab | 71.1±2.73 a | 45.8±1.56 a |
N3 | 7.2±0.26 a | 27.5±1.25 a | 11.5±1.30 a | 15.7±0.21 a | 11.5±0.26 b | 73.4±2.63 a | 42.3±0.24 b |
Table 2 Dry matter accumulation of sesame under different nitrogen treatments
处理 Treatment | 根干重 Root dry matter/g | 茎干重 Stem dry matter/g | 叶干重 Leaf dry matter/g | 蒴果皮干重 Capsule peel dry matter/g | 单株产量 Yield per plant/g | 总干物质重 Total dry matter /g | 粒蒴比 Seeds capsule ratio/% |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
N0 | 5.4±0.31 b | 18.8±0.85 c | 7.4±0.78 b | 11.7±0.40 b | 8.2±0.20 c | 54.1±1.40 b | 41.9±0.26 b |
N1 | 6.7±0.23 a | 22.5±0.70 bc | 9.0±0.59 b | 15.7±0.44 a | 13.8±1.19 a | 67.7±3.00 a | 46.8±1.50 a |
N2 | 6.7±0.42 a | 25.2±1.14 ab | 9.2±1.00 ab | 16.2±0.62 a | 13.7±0.96 ab | 71.1±2.73 a | 45.8±1.56 a |
N3 | 7.2±0.26 a | 27.5±1.25 a | 11.5±1.30 a | 15.7±0.21 a | 11.5±0.26 b | 73.4±2.63 a | 42.3±0.24 b |
Fig. 1 Economic coefficient of sesame under different nitrogen treatmentsNote:Different lowercase letters indicate significant differences between different treatments at P<0.05 level.
因子Factor | x1 | x2 | x3 | x4 | x5 | x6 | x7 | x8 | x9 | x10 | x11 | x12 | x13 | x14 | x15 | x16 | x17 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
x2 | 0.564 5* | ||||||||||||||||
x3 | -0.091 3 | 0.155 3 | |||||||||||||||
x4 | 0.060 4 | 0.167 7 | -0.105 6 | ||||||||||||||
x5 | 0.538 9* | 0.862 5** | 0.010 1 | -0.317 6 | |||||||||||||
x6 | 0.730 9** | 0.473 9 | -0.292 5 | 0.097 7 | 0.470 8 | ||||||||||||
x7 | 0.387 8 | 0.388 9 | 0.096 7 | -0.027 2 | 0.374 8 | 0.414 3 | |||||||||||
x8 | 0.456 6 | 0.440 5 | -0.013 5 | 0.301 6 | 0.281 6 | 0.474 5 | 0.653 2** | ||||||||||
x9 | 0.014 4 | 0.014 1 | -0.045 8 | 0.121 1 | -0.038 1 | -0.222 4 | -0.306 0 | -0.323 7 | |||||||||
x10 | -0.024 5 | 0.087 9 | -0.009 2 | -0.008 4 | 0.091 8 | 0.233 5 | 0.291 8 | 0.386 3 | -0.952 0** | ||||||||
x11 | 0.662 9** | 0.422 0 | -0.031 5 | 0.154 0 | 0.341 0 | 0.661 1** | 0.550 9* | 0.597 2* | -0.172 2 | 0.184 0 | |||||||
x12 | 0.725 3** | 0.469 6 | -0.069 0 | 0.062 5 | 0.440 8 | 0.636 0** | 0.730 8** | 0.585 0* | -0.203 1 | 0.163 9 | 0.783 3** | ||||||
x13 | 0.830 6** | 0.551 3* | -0.086 3 | 0.167 9 | 0.471 1 | 0.645 5** | 0.513 4* | 0.526 1* | 0.078 3 | -0.057 0 | 0.785 1** | 0.854 2** | |||||
x14 | 0.374 3 | 0.003 0 | 0.119 7 | -0.060 9 | 0.010 2 | 0.357 5 | 0.070 9 | 0.100 8 | 0.015 1 | -0.117 3 | 0.326 8 | 0.207 7 | 0.189 5 | ||||
x15 | 0.889 6** | 0.505 4* | -0.048 9 | 0.081 5 | 0.462 3 | 0.728 0** | 0.581 1* | 0.545 9* | -0.052 0 | 0.016 1 | 0.815 5** | 0.914 7** | 0.920 9** | 0.471 9 | |||
x16 | 0.873 0** | 0.504 3* | -0.047 1 | 0.097 2 | 0.453 0 | 0.736 2** | 0.592 0* | 0.570 8* | -0.075 6 | 0.047 5 | 0.872 6** | 0.916 4** | 0.922 0** | 0.458 5 | 0.994 3** | ||
x17 | 0.095 3 | 0.007 4 | -0.124 3 | 0.193 0 | -0.065 4 | 0.249 1 | 0.186 1 | 0.570 4* | -0.175 3 | 0.274 3 | 0.183 7 | 0.054 5 | 0.127 8 | 0.142 1 | 0.120 8 | 0.135 8 | |
x18 | -0.061 4 | -0.163 5 | -0.217 7 | 0.136 4 | -0.185 8 | 0.208 0 | 0.077 4 | 0.123 5 | -0.124 1 | 0.092 5 | 0.151 1 | 0.105 6 | 0.176 7 | 0.035 2 | 0.099 9 | 0.112 1 | 0.480 2 |
Table 3 Correlation coefficients between agronomic trait and yield factors at N0 treatment
因子Factor | x1 | x2 | x3 | x4 | x5 | x6 | x7 | x8 | x9 | x10 | x11 | x12 | x13 | x14 | x15 | x16 | x17 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
x2 | 0.564 5* | ||||||||||||||||
x3 | -0.091 3 | 0.155 3 | |||||||||||||||
x4 | 0.060 4 | 0.167 7 | -0.105 6 | ||||||||||||||
x5 | 0.538 9* | 0.862 5** | 0.010 1 | -0.317 6 | |||||||||||||
x6 | 0.730 9** | 0.473 9 | -0.292 5 | 0.097 7 | 0.470 8 | ||||||||||||
x7 | 0.387 8 | 0.388 9 | 0.096 7 | -0.027 2 | 0.374 8 | 0.414 3 | |||||||||||
x8 | 0.456 6 | 0.440 5 | -0.013 5 | 0.301 6 | 0.281 6 | 0.474 5 | 0.653 2** | ||||||||||
x9 | 0.014 4 | 0.014 1 | -0.045 8 | 0.121 1 | -0.038 1 | -0.222 4 | -0.306 0 | -0.323 7 | |||||||||
x10 | -0.024 5 | 0.087 9 | -0.009 2 | -0.008 4 | 0.091 8 | 0.233 5 | 0.291 8 | 0.386 3 | -0.952 0** | ||||||||
x11 | 0.662 9** | 0.422 0 | -0.031 5 | 0.154 0 | 0.341 0 | 0.661 1** | 0.550 9* | 0.597 2* | -0.172 2 | 0.184 0 | |||||||
x12 | 0.725 3** | 0.469 6 | -0.069 0 | 0.062 5 | 0.440 8 | 0.636 0** | 0.730 8** | 0.585 0* | -0.203 1 | 0.163 9 | 0.783 3** | ||||||
x13 | 0.830 6** | 0.551 3* | -0.086 3 | 0.167 9 | 0.471 1 | 0.645 5** | 0.513 4* | 0.526 1* | 0.078 3 | -0.057 0 | 0.785 1** | 0.854 2** | |||||
x14 | 0.374 3 | 0.003 0 | 0.119 7 | -0.060 9 | 0.010 2 | 0.357 5 | 0.070 9 | 0.100 8 | 0.015 1 | -0.117 3 | 0.326 8 | 0.207 7 | 0.189 5 | ||||
x15 | 0.889 6** | 0.505 4* | -0.048 9 | 0.081 5 | 0.462 3 | 0.728 0** | 0.581 1* | 0.545 9* | -0.052 0 | 0.016 1 | 0.815 5** | 0.914 7** | 0.920 9** | 0.471 9 | |||
x16 | 0.873 0** | 0.504 3* | -0.047 1 | 0.097 2 | 0.453 0 | 0.736 2** | 0.592 0* | 0.570 8* | -0.075 6 | 0.047 5 | 0.872 6** | 0.916 4** | 0.922 0** | 0.458 5 | 0.994 3** | ||
x17 | 0.095 3 | 0.007 4 | -0.124 3 | 0.193 0 | -0.065 4 | 0.249 1 | 0.186 1 | 0.570 4* | -0.175 3 | 0.274 3 | 0.183 7 | 0.054 5 | 0.127 8 | 0.142 1 | 0.120 8 | 0.135 8 | |
x18 | -0.061 4 | -0.163 5 | -0.217 7 | 0.136 4 | -0.185 8 | 0.208 0 | 0.077 4 | 0.123 5 | -0.124 1 | 0.092 5 | 0.151 1 | 0.105 6 | 0.176 7 | 0.035 2 | 0.099 9 | 0.112 1 | 0.480 2 |
因子Factor | x1 | x2 | x3 | x4 | x5 | x6 | x7 | x8 | x9 | x10 | x11 | x12 | x13 | x14 | x15 | x16 | x17 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
x2 | 0.686 7** | ||||||||||||||||
x3 | 0.103 9 | 0.189 4 | |||||||||||||||
x4 | 0.170 4 | 0.314 2 | -0.063 1 | ||||||||||||||
x5 | 0.429 1 | 0.560 2* | 0.044 6 | -0.593 5* | |||||||||||||
x6 | 0.818 0** | 0.559 0* | 0.181 4 | 0.193 0 | 0.284 6 | ||||||||||||
x7 | 0.642 7** | 0.461 9 | -0.115 1 | 0.129 6 | 0.308 0 | 0.553 9* | |||||||||||
x8 | 0.772 0** | 0.565 9* | 0.112 9 | 0.184 7 | 0.310 0 | 0.665 6 | 0.482 3 | ||||||||||
x9 | -0.365 4 | -0.104 3 | 0.043 9 | 0.016 4 | -0.112 8 | -0.307 1 | -0.266 9 | -0.179 6 | |||||||||
x10 | 0.441 0 | 0.179 0 | -0.018 5 | -0.271 0 | 0.396 6 | 0.284 7 | 0.484 1 | 0.174 0 | -0.592 0* | ||||||||
x11 | 0.564 1* | 0.520 4* | 0.148 3 | 0.049 7 | 0.382 7 | 0.377 9 | 0.313 0 | 0.430 1 | -0.357 1 | 0.454 0 | |||||||
x12 | 0.744 7** | 0.463 6 | 0.163 2 | -0.029 6 | 0.400 3 | 0.524 6* | 0.438 1 | 0.403 3 | -0.429 6 | 0.406 9 | 0.564 6* | ||||||
x13 | 0.946 8** | 0.701 3** | 0.161 3 | 0.110 2 | 0.484 5 | 0.737 5** | 0.546 1* | 0.696 5** | -0.280 6 | 0.427 9 | 0.551 0* | 0.751 4** | |||||
x14 | 0.206 3 | 0.270 5 | -0.192 6 | -0.109 3 | 0.364 8 | 0.108 5 | 0.169 9 | 0.296 9 | -0.166 8 | 0.180 0 | -0.003 9 | 0.173 8 | 0.185 4 | ||||
x15 | 0.937 8** | 0.670 9** | 0.104 2 | 0.057 6 | 0.514 3* | 0.712 4** | 0.575 4* | 0.680 6** | -0.395 4 | 0.463 1 | 0.560 6* | 0.875 0** | 0.936 7** | 0.396 0 | |||
x16 | 0.936 5** | 0.687 0** | 0.116 5 | 0.059 7 | 0.524 3* | 0.704 1** | 0.569 8* | 0.682 7** | -0.412 2 | 0.488 1 | 0.656 3** | 0.879 4** | 0.933 6** | 0.360 2 | 0.992 7** | ||
x17 | 0.104 0 | 0.025 8 | 0.030 1 | -0.013 6 | 0.029 1 | -0.030 8 | 0.190 2 | -0.149 0 | -0.082 5 | 0.085 0 | -0.032 9 | 0.274 0 | 0.161 4 | -0.158 4 | 0.150 4 | 0.132 3 | |
x18 | 0.091 5 | -0.008 9 | -0.070 7 | -0.038 6 | 0.038 6 | -0.020 1 | 0.200 7 | -0.085 5 | -0.087 7 | 0.058 8 | -0.080 7 | 0.220 7 | 0.105 7 | -0.057 8 | 0.130 1 | 0.106 7 | 0.959 7** |
Table 4 Correlation coefficients between agronomic trait and yield factors at N1 treatment
因子Factor | x1 | x2 | x3 | x4 | x5 | x6 | x7 | x8 | x9 | x10 | x11 | x12 | x13 | x14 | x15 | x16 | x17 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
x2 | 0.686 7** | ||||||||||||||||
x3 | 0.103 9 | 0.189 4 | |||||||||||||||
x4 | 0.170 4 | 0.314 2 | -0.063 1 | ||||||||||||||
x5 | 0.429 1 | 0.560 2* | 0.044 6 | -0.593 5* | |||||||||||||
x6 | 0.818 0** | 0.559 0* | 0.181 4 | 0.193 0 | 0.284 6 | ||||||||||||
x7 | 0.642 7** | 0.461 9 | -0.115 1 | 0.129 6 | 0.308 0 | 0.553 9* | |||||||||||
x8 | 0.772 0** | 0.565 9* | 0.112 9 | 0.184 7 | 0.310 0 | 0.665 6 | 0.482 3 | ||||||||||
x9 | -0.365 4 | -0.104 3 | 0.043 9 | 0.016 4 | -0.112 8 | -0.307 1 | -0.266 9 | -0.179 6 | |||||||||
x10 | 0.441 0 | 0.179 0 | -0.018 5 | -0.271 0 | 0.396 6 | 0.284 7 | 0.484 1 | 0.174 0 | -0.592 0* | ||||||||
x11 | 0.564 1* | 0.520 4* | 0.148 3 | 0.049 7 | 0.382 7 | 0.377 9 | 0.313 0 | 0.430 1 | -0.357 1 | 0.454 0 | |||||||
x12 | 0.744 7** | 0.463 6 | 0.163 2 | -0.029 6 | 0.400 3 | 0.524 6* | 0.438 1 | 0.403 3 | -0.429 6 | 0.406 9 | 0.564 6* | ||||||
x13 | 0.946 8** | 0.701 3** | 0.161 3 | 0.110 2 | 0.484 5 | 0.737 5** | 0.546 1* | 0.696 5** | -0.280 6 | 0.427 9 | 0.551 0* | 0.751 4** | |||||
x14 | 0.206 3 | 0.270 5 | -0.192 6 | -0.109 3 | 0.364 8 | 0.108 5 | 0.169 9 | 0.296 9 | -0.166 8 | 0.180 0 | -0.003 9 | 0.173 8 | 0.185 4 | ||||
x15 | 0.937 8** | 0.670 9** | 0.104 2 | 0.057 6 | 0.514 3* | 0.712 4** | 0.575 4* | 0.680 6** | -0.395 4 | 0.463 1 | 0.560 6* | 0.875 0** | 0.936 7** | 0.396 0 | |||
x16 | 0.936 5** | 0.687 0** | 0.116 5 | 0.059 7 | 0.524 3* | 0.704 1** | 0.569 8* | 0.682 7** | -0.412 2 | 0.488 1 | 0.656 3** | 0.879 4** | 0.933 6** | 0.360 2 | 0.992 7** | ||
x17 | 0.104 0 | 0.025 8 | 0.030 1 | -0.013 6 | 0.029 1 | -0.030 8 | 0.190 2 | -0.149 0 | -0.082 5 | 0.085 0 | -0.032 9 | 0.274 0 | 0.161 4 | -0.158 4 | 0.150 4 | 0.132 3 | |
x18 | 0.091 5 | -0.008 9 | -0.070 7 | -0.038 6 | 0.038 6 | -0.020 1 | 0.200 7 | -0.085 5 | -0.087 7 | 0.058 8 | -0.080 7 | 0.220 7 | 0.105 7 | -0.057 8 | 0.130 1 | 0.106 7 | 0.959 7** |
因子Factor | x1 | x2 | x3 | x4 | x5 | x6 | x7 | x8 | x9 | x10 | x11 | x12 | x13 | x14 | x15 | x16 | x17 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
x2 | 0.692 7** | ||||||||||||||||
x3 | 0.078 9 | 0.218 3 | |||||||||||||||
x4 | -0.234 9 | -0.044 7 | -0.046 3 | ||||||||||||||
x5 | 0.688 7** | 0.808 9** | 0.052 5 | -0.604 5* | |||||||||||||
x6 | 0.839 5** | 0.634 5** | 0.154 8 | -0.212 0 | 0.616 4* | ||||||||||||
x7 | 0.750 6** | 0.431 8 | 0.095 1 | -0.195 4 | 0.450 4 | 0.592 8* | |||||||||||
x8 | 0.155 2 | 0.069 4 | 0.017 1 | -0.279 0 | 0.214 5 | 0.148 5 | 0.059 5 | ||||||||||
x9 | -0.173 7 | -0.159 1 | 0.145 1 | 0.092 1 | -0.205 0 | -0.078 9 | -0.179 5 | -0.021 1 | |||||||||
x10 | 0.154 2 | 0.078 8 | -0.076 5 | -0.156 5 | 0.166 0 | 0.087 7 | 0.179 1 | 0.031 9 | -0.816 9** | ||||||||
x11 | 0.809 8** | 0.588 4* | 0.083 8 | -0.171 0 | 0.566 0* | 0.706 8** | 0.674 4** | 0.105 0 | -0.212 2 | 0.222 4 | |||||||
x12 | 0.852 7** | 0.607 5* | 0.085 9 | -0.232 0 | 0.616 3* | 0.726 5** | 0.665 2** | 0.120 9 | -0.246 1 | 0.212 4 | 0.790 4** | ||||||
x13 | 0.874 3** | 0.631 0** | 0.103 3 | -0.227 7 | 0.630 4** | 0.792 3** | 0.617 1* | 0.124 9 | -0.251 0 | 0.250 2 | 0.814 1** | 0.763 3** | |||||
x14 | 0.471 9 | 0.404 1 | 0.165 9 | -0.067 8 | 0.343 7 | 0.475 9 | 0.378 0 | 0.192 1 | 0.026 2 | 0.068 7 | 0.359 2 | 0.306 2 | 0.367 1 | ||||
x15 | 0.961 6** | 0.692 0** | 0.112 6 | -0.239 9 | 0.685 8** | 0.840 9** | 0.724 0** | 0.158 2 | -0.222 9 | 0.216 9 | 0.849 8** | 0.926 8** | 0.913 1** | 0.511 0* | |||
x16 | 0.958 7** | 0.690 6** | 0.110 9 | -0.235 3 | 0.682 3** | 0.838 2** | 0.729 7** | 0.154 3 | -0.225 2 | 0.221 1 | 0.882 0** | 0.925 2** | 0.915 9** | 0.500 8* | 0.997 9** | ||
x17 | 0.132 5 | -0.057 6 | -0.057 4 | -0.138 7 | 0.041 5 | 0.054 9 | 0.231 8 | -0.048 0 | -0.187 8 | 0.203 3 | 0.203 8 | 0.162 0 | 0.135 5 | -0.108 1 | 0.129 6 | 0.140 8 | |
x18 | -0.032 2 | -0.186 6 | -0.161 7 | -0.039 4 | -0.105 0 | -0.038 4 | 0.005 8 | -0.095 5 | -0.029 2 | 0.105 1 | 0.087 0 | -0.066 8 | -0.026 1 | -0.001 8 | -0.045 0 | -0.029 6 | 0.490 5 |
Table 5 Correlation coefficients between agronomic trait and yield factors at N2 treatment
因子Factor | x1 | x2 | x3 | x4 | x5 | x6 | x7 | x8 | x9 | x10 | x11 | x12 | x13 | x14 | x15 | x16 | x17 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
x2 | 0.692 7** | ||||||||||||||||
x3 | 0.078 9 | 0.218 3 | |||||||||||||||
x4 | -0.234 9 | -0.044 7 | -0.046 3 | ||||||||||||||
x5 | 0.688 7** | 0.808 9** | 0.052 5 | -0.604 5* | |||||||||||||
x6 | 0.839 5** | 0.634 5** | 0.154 8 | -0.212 0 | 0.616 4* | ||||||||||||
x7 | 0.750 6** | 0.431 8 | 0.095 1 | -0.195 4 | 0.450 4 | 0.592 8* | |||||||||||
x8 | 0.155 2 | 0.069 4 | 0.017 1 | -0.279 0 | 0.214 5 | 0.148 5 | 0.059 5 | ||||||||||
x9 | -0.173 7 | -0.159 1 | 0.145 1 | 0.092 1 | -0.205 0 | -0.078 9 | -0.179 5 | -0.021 1 | |||||||||
x10 | 0.154 2 | 0.078 8 | -0.076 5 | -0.156 5 | 0.166 0 | 0.087 7 | 0.179 1 | 0.031 9 | -0.816 9** | ||||||||
x11 | 0.809 8** | 0.588 4* | 0.083 8 | -0.171 0 | 0.566 0* | 0.706 8** | 0.674 4** | 0.105 0 | -0.212 2 | 0.222 4 | |||||||
x12 | 0.852 7** | 0.607 5* | 0.085 9 | -0.232 0 | 0.616 3* | 0.726 5** | 0.665 2** | 0.120 9 | -0.246 1 | 0.212 4 | 0.790 4** | ||||||
x13 | 0.874 3** | 0.631 0** | 0.103 3 | -0.227 7 | 0.630 4** | 0.792 3** | 0.617 1* | 0.124 9 | -0.251 0 | 0.250 2 | 0.814 1** | 0.763 3** | |||||
x14 | 0.471 9 | 0.404 1 | 0.165 9 | -0.067 8 | 0.343 7 | 0.475 9 | 0.378 0 | 0.192 1 | 0.026 2 | 0.068 7 | 0.359 2 | 0.306 2 | 0.367 1 | ||||
x15 | 0.961 6** | 0.692 0** | 0.112 6 | -0.239 9 | 0.685 8** | 0.840 9** | 0.724 0** | 0.158 2 | -0.222 9 | 0.216 9 | 0.849 8** | 0.926 8** | 0.913 1** | 0.511 0* | |||
x16 | 0.958 7** | 0.690 6** | 0.110 9 | -0.235 3 | 0.682 3** | 0.838 2** | 0.729 7** | 0.154 3 | -0.225 2 | 0.221 1 | 0.882 0** | 0.925 2** | 0.915 9** | 0.500 8* | 0.997 9** | ||
x17 | 0.132 5 | -0.057 6 | -0.057 4 | -0.138 7 | 0.041 5 | 0.054 9 | 0.231 8 | -0.048 0 | -0.187 8 | 0.203 3 | 0.203 8 | 0.162 0 | 0.135 5 | -0.108 1 | 0.129 6 | 0.140 8 | |
x18 | -0.032 2 | -0.186 6 | -0.161 7 | -0.039 4 | -0.105 0 | -0.038 4 | 0.005 8 | -0.095 5 | -0.029 2 | 0.105 1 | 0.087 0 | -0.066 8 | -0.026 1 | -0.001 8 | -0.045 0 | -0.029 6 | 0.490 5 |
因子Factor | x1 | x2 | x3 | x4 | x5 | x6 | x7 | x8 | x9 | x10 | x11 | x12 | x13 | x14 | x15 | x16 | x17 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
x2 | 0.520 4* | ||||||||||||||||
x3 | -0.149 1 | -0.344 6 | |||||||||||||||
x4 | 0.109 5 | -0.268 5 | 0.020 1 | ||||||||||||||
x5 | 0.317 8 | 0.864 5** | -0.403 6 | -0.693 8** | |||||||||||||
x6 | 0.458 4 | 0.420 6 | 0.273 4 | -0.273 8 | 0.378 0 | ||||||||||||
x7 | 0.807 2** | 0.327 3 | -0.201 3 | -0.055 9 | 0.280 9 | 0.110 6 | |||||||||||
x8 | 0.945 9** | 0.561 0* | -0.157 6 | -0.038 9 | 0.422 2 | 0.454 9 | 0.808 4** | ||||||||||
x9 | -0.023 2 | 0.003 9 | -0.161 0 | -0.472 2 | 0.269 6 | -0.249 2 | 0.259 6 | 0.166 5 | |||||||||
x10 | 0.059 6 | 0.028 8 | 0.250 0 | 0.327 1 | -0.188 0 | 0.236 8 | -0.129 7 | -0.163 5 | -0.897 5** | ||||||||
x11 | 0.866 5** | 0.669 9** | -0.309 9 | 0.090 3 | 0.454 1 | 0.466 4 | 0.563 1* | 0.845 5** | -0.018 3 | 0.010 8 | |||||||
x12 | 0.665 1** | 0.303 9 | -0.098 5 | 0.208 8 | 0.113 5 | 0.461 5 | 0.465 8 | 0.637 8** | -0.326 7 | 0.145 6 | 0.642 5** | ||||||
x13 | 0.624 0** | 0.048 4 | 0.173 6 | 0.352 5 | -0.175 4 | 0.351 2 | 0.511 3* | 0.522 6* | -0.138 1 | 0.047 1 | 0.529 1* | 0.726 7** | |||||
x14 | -0.017 7 | 0.376 0 | 0.257 3 | -0.379 7 | 0.404 7 | 0.335 3 | 0.079 7 | 0.042 1 | 0.217 9 | -0.059 4 | 0.075 5 | -0.159 7 | 0.103 9 | ||||
x15 | 0.810 1** | 0.403 7 | 0.009 2 | 0.162 7 | 0.186 7 | 0.551 1* | 0.636 6** | 0.764 9** | -0.180 2 | 0.097 6 | 0.755 2** | 0.905 4** | 0.875 2** | 0.150 8 | |||
x16 | 0.847 0** | 0.460 9 | -0.042 5 | 0.156 5 | 0.236 7 | 0.556 1* | 0.646 4** | 0.804 2** | -0.160 0 | 0.086 8 | 0.820 9** | 0.893 5** | 0.848 7** | 0.143 7 | 0.994 3** | ||
x17 | -0.029 8 | 0.116 4 | -0.281 6 | 0.238 6 | 0.002 1 | -0.130 9 | 0.063 6 | -0.085 5 | -0.013 8 | 0.060 9 | 0.119 9 | 0.220 3 | 0.128 2 | 0.002 0 | 0.151 3 | 0.151 3 | |
x18 | -0.050 4 | -0.002 9 | -0.380 9 | -0.056 6 | 0.088 6 | -0.198 4 | 0.236 6 | -0.073 7 | 0.294 3 | -0.353 6 | -0.123 5 | 0.095 9 | 0.297 0 | 0.108 5 | 0.146 6 | 0.107 5 | 0.282 9 |
Table 6 Correlation coefficients between agronomic trait and yield factors at N3 treatment
因子Factor | x1 | x2 | x3 | x4 | x5 | x6 | x7 | x8 | x9 | x10 | x11 | x12 | x13 | x14 | x15 | x16 | x17 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
x2 | 0.520 4* | ||||||||||||||||
x3 | -0.149 1 | -0.344 6 | |||||||||||||||
x4 | 0.109 5 | -0.268 5 | 0.020 1 | ||||||||||||||
x5 | 0.317 8 | 0.864 5** | -0.403 6 | -0.693 8** | |||||||||||||
x6 | 0.458 4 | 0.420 6 | 0.273 4 | -0.273 8 | 0.378 0 | ||||||||||||
x7 | 0.807 2** | 0.327 3 | -0.201 3 | -0.055 9 | 0.280 9 | 0.110 6 | |||||||||||
x8 | 0.945 9** | 0.561 0* | -0.157 6 | -0.038 9 | 0.422 2 | 0.454 9 | 0.808 4** | ||||||||||
x9 | -0.023 2 | 0.003 9 | -0.161 0 | -0.472 2 | 0.269 6 | -0.249 2 | 0.259 6 | 0.166 5 | |||||||||
x10 | 0.059 6 | 0.028 8 | 0.250 0 | 0.327 1 | -0.188 0 | 0.236 8 | -0.129 7 | -0.163 5 | -0.897 5** | ||||||||
x11 | 0.866 5** | 0.669 9** | -0.309 9 | 0.090 3 | 0.454 1 | 0.466 4 | 0.563 1* | 0.845 5** | -0.018 3 | 0.010 8 | |||||||
x12 | 0.665 1** | 0.303 9 | -0.098 5 | 0.208 8 | 0.113 5 | 0.461 5 | 0.465 8 | 0.637 8** | -0.326 7 | 0.145 6 | 0.642 5** | ||||||
x13 | 0.624 0** | 0.048 4 | 0.173 6 | 0.352 5 | -0.175 4 | 0.351 2 | 0.511 3* | 0.522 6* | -0.138 1 | 0.047 1 | 0.529 1* | 0.726 7** | |||||
x14 | -0.017 7 | 0.376 0 | 0.257 3 | -0.379 7 | 0.404 7 | 0.335 3 | 0.079 7 | 0.042 1 | 0.217 9 | -0.059 4 | 0.075 5 | -0.159 7 | 0.103 9 | ||||
x15 | 0.810 1** | 0.403 7 | 0.009 2 | 0.162 7 | 0.186 7 | 0.551 1* | 0.636 6** | 0.764 9** | -0.180 2 | 0.097 6 | 0.755 2** | 0.905 4** | 0.875 2** | 0.150 8 | |||
x16 | 0.847 0** | 0.460 9 | -0.042 5 | 0.156 5 | 0.236 7 | 0.556 1* | 0.646 4** | 0.804 2** | -0.160 0 | 0.086 8 | 0.820 9** | 0.893 5** | 0.848 7** | 0.143 7 | 0.994 3** | ||
x17 | -0.029 8 | 0.116 4 | -0.281 6 | 0.238 6 | 0.002 1 | -0.130 9 | 0.063 6 | -0.085 5 | -0.013 8 | 0.060 9 | 0.119 9 | 0.220 3 | 0.128 2 | 0.002 0 | 0.151 3 | 0.151 3 | |
x18 | -0.050 4 | -0.002 9 | -0.380 9 | -0.056 6 | 0.088 6 | -0.198 4 | 0.236 6 | -0.073 7 | 0.294 3 | -0.353 6 | -0.123 5 | 0.095 9 | 0.297 0 | 0.108 5 | 0.146 6 | 0.107 5 | 0.282 9 |
1 | 刘兆辉,吴小宾,谭德水,等.一次性施肥在我国主要粮食作物中的应用与环境效应[J].中国农业科学,2018,51(20):3827-3839. |
LIU Z H, WU X B, TAN D S, et al.. Application and environmental effects of one-off fertilization technique in major cereal crops in China [J]. Sci. Agric. Sin., 2018, 51(20):3827-3839. | |
2 | 陈磊,宋书会,云鹏,等.连续三年减施氮肥对潮土玉米生长及根际土壤氮素供应的影响[J].植物营养与肥料学报,2019,25(9):1482-1494. |
CHEN L, SONG S H, YUN P, et al.. Effects of reduced nitrogen fertilizer for three consecutive years on maize growth and rhizosphere nitrogen supply in fluvo-aquic soil [J]. J. Plant Nutr. Fert., 2019, 25(9):1482-1494. | |
3 | 雒文鹤,师祖姣,王旭敏,等.节水减氮对土壤硝态氮分布和冬小麦水氮利用效率的影响[J].作物学报,2020,46(6):924-936. |
LUO W H, SHI Z J, WANG X M, et al.. Effects of water saving and nitrogen reduction on soil nitrate nitrogen distribution, water and nitrogen use efficiencies of winter wheat [J]. Acta Agron. Sin., 2020, 46(6):924-936. | |
4 | 卫双玲,李春明,高桐梅,等.芝麻氮、磷、钾肥的效应研究[J].植物营养与肥料学报,2013,19(3):644-649. |
WEI S L, LI C M, GAO T M, et al.. Study on the effects of N, P, K fertilizer in sesame [J]. J. Plant Nutr. Fert., 2013, 19(3):644-649. | |
5 | 高春华,冯波,曹芳,等.施氮量对花后高温胁迫后小麦同化物积累、转运及产量的影响[J].中国农业科学,2020,53(21):4365-4375. |
GAO C H, FENG B, CAO F, et al.. Effects of nitrogen application rate on assimilate: a accumulation, transportation and grain yield in wheat under high temperature stress after anthesis [J]. Sci. Agric. Sin., 2020, 53(21):4365-4375. | |
6 | 梅晶晶,周苏玫,徐凤丹,等.小麦根蘖发育和产量对耕作和追氮方式以及施氮量的响应[J].植物营养与肥料学报,2020,26(6):1069-1080. |
MEI J J, ZHOU S M, XU F D, et al.. Response of root and tiller development and yield of wheat to tillage and nitrogen topdressing patterns and nitrogen application rates [J]. J. Plant Nutr. Fert., 2020, 26(6):1069-1080. | |
7 | 赵晖,李尚中,樊廷录,等.种植密度与施氮量对旱地地膜玉米产量、水分利用效率和品质的影响[J].干旱地区农业研究,2021,39(5):169-177. |
ZHAO H, LI S Z, FAN T L, et al.. Effects of planting density and nitrogen fertilizer rate on yield, water use efficiency and quality of dry land maize with film mulching [J]. Agric. Res. Arid Areas, 2021, 39(5):169-177. | |
8 | 杨永辉,武继承,高翠民,等.灌溉方式、灌水量及施氮量对小麦、玉米周年水分利用的影响[J].水土保持研究,2020,27(4):134-141, 148. |
YANG Y H, WU J C, GAO C M, et al.. Effects of irrigation mode, irrigation volume and application rate of nitrogenon annual water use of wWheat and maize [J]. Res. Soil Water Conserv., 2020, 27(4):134-141, 148. | |
9 | 吴培,陈天晔,袁嘉琦,等.施氮量和直播密度互作对水稻产量形成特征的影响[J].中国水稻科学,2019,33(3):269-281. |
WU P, CHEN T Y, YUAN J Q, et al.. Effects of interaction between nitrogen application rate and direct-sowing density on yield formation characteristics of rice [J]. Chin J. Rice Sci., 2019, 33(3):269-281. | |
10 | 田效琴,李卓,刘永红.施氮量和播种密度对不同熟期油菜干物质量和产量的影响[J].核农学报,2019,33(4):798-807. |
TIAN X Q, LI Z, LIU Y H. Effects of densities and nitrogen fertilizer on dry matter and yield of different maturity rapeseed [J]. J. Nucl. Agric. Sci., 2019, 33(4):798-807. | |
11 | 易媛,董召娣,张明伟,等.减氮对半冬性中筋小麦产量、NUE及氮代谢关键酶活性的影响[J].核农学报,2015,29(2):365-374. |
YI Y, DONG Z D, ZHANG M W, et al.. Effects of reduction nitrogen on grain yield, NUE and enzymes activities related to nitrogen metabolism in semi-winter medium-gluten wheat [J]. J. Nucl. Agric. Sci., 2015, 29(2):365-374. | |
12 | DOBERMANN A, CASSMAN K G. Plant nutrient management for enhanced productivity in intensive grain production systems of the United States and Asia [J]. Plant Soil, 2002, 247(1):153-175. |
13 | 师筝,高斯曼,李彤,等.施氮量对不同叶绿素含量小麦生长、产量和品质的影响[J].麦类作物学报,2021,41(9):1-9. |
SHI Z, GAO S M, LI T, et al.. Effect of nitrogen application rate on growth yield and quality of wheat with different chlorophyll content [J]. J. Triticeae Crops, 2021, 41(9):1-9. | |
14 | HU C, CAO Z P, CHEN Y F, et al.. Dynamics of soil microbial biomass carbon, mineral nitrogen and nitrogen mineralization in long-term field experiment, Northern China [J]. J. Sustain. Agric., 2008, 32(2):287-302. |
15 | ROY A, SINGH K P. Dynamics of microbial biomass and nitrogen supply during primary succession on blast furnace slag dumps in dry tropics [J]. Soil. Biol. Biochem., 2003, 35:365-372. |
16 | 安婷婷,侯小畔,周亚男,等.氮肥用量对小麦开花后根际土壤特性和产量的影响[J].中国农业科学,2017,50(17):3352-3364. |
AN T T, HOU X P, ZHOU Y N, et al.. Effects of nitrogen fertilizer rates on rhizosphere soil characteristics and yield after anthesis of wheat [J]. Sci. Agric. Sin., 2017, 50(17):3352-3364. | |
17 | 杨晓梅,尹昌斌,李贵春,等.氮肥减量及秸秆替代过量氮肥下冬小麦/夏玉米轮作体系氮素淋失风险研究[J].中国农业资源与区划,2016,37(7):116-122. |
YANG X M, YIN C B, LI G C, et al.. Effects of reducing nitrogen application and replacing part of nitrogen fertilizer by crop residue on nitrogen leaching in winter wheat-summer corn system [J]. Chin. J. Agric. Resour. Regional Plan., 2016, 37(7):116-122. | |
18 | 张宏,周建斌,王春阳,等.不同栽培模式及施氮对玉米-小麦轮作体系土壤肥力及硝态氮累积的影响[J].中国生态农业学报,2010(4):693-697. |
ZHANG H, ZHOU J B, WANG C Y, et al.. Effect of cultivation pattern and nitrogen application rate on soil fertility and nitrate accumulation under maize-wheat rotation system [J]. Chin. J. Eco-Agric., 2010(4):693-697. | |
19 | 李志坤.过量施用氮肥及缩节胺对棉花产量及纤维品质和种子质量的影响[D].郑州:河南农业大学, 2018. |
LI Z K. Effects of excess nitrogen fertilizer and DPC on yield and quality of fibers and seeds in cotton [D]. Zhenzhou: Henan Agricultural University, 2018. | |
20 | 张江林,侯文峰,鲁剑巍,等.不同施氮量和移栽密度对水稻产量及灌浆特性的影响[J].中国农业科技导报,2017,19(2):75-85. |
ZHANG J L, HOU W F, LU J W, et al.. Effects of nitrogen application rates and planting density on rice yield and grain-filling properties [J]. J. Agric. Sci. Technol., 2017, 19(2):75-85. | |
21 | 张子武,沈阿林,张桂兰,等.夏播芝麻营养吸收规律与平衡施肥研究─Ⅰ营养吸收及干物质积累规率[J].华北农学报,1994(1):52-56. |
ZHANG Z W, SHEN A L, ZHANG G L, et al.. Studies on nutrient absorption rules of summer sesame and its balanced fertilization Ⅰ: the rule of nutrients absorption and dry matter accumulation [J]. Acta Agric. Boreali-Sin., 1994(1):52-56. | |
22 | 张子武,沈阿林,张桂兰,等.夏播芝麻营养吸收规律与平衡施肥研究─Ⅱ夏播芝麻的高产平衡施肥[J].华北农学报,1994(S1):118-122. |
ZHANG Z W, SHEN A L, ZHANG G L, et al.. Nutritive absorption rules of summer sesame and its balanced fertilization Ⅱ: balanced fertilization for high yield of summer sesame [J]. Acta Agric. Boreali-Sin., 1994(S1):118-122. | |
23 | 何佩云,张余,周良,等.干旱胁迫及氮肥调控对苦荞植株形态、生理特性及产量的影响[J].应用与环境生物学报,2022,28(1):128-134. |
HE P Y, ZHANG Y, ZHOU L, et al.. Effects of drought stress and nitrogen fertilizer regulation on morphology, physiological characteristics and yield of Fagopyrum tataricum [J]. Chin. J. Appl. Environ. Biol., 2022,28(1):128-134. | |
24 | ZHANG Y Q, WANG J D, GONG S, et al.. Nitrogen fertigation effect on photosynthesis, grain yield and water use efficiency of winter wheat [J]. Agric. Water. Manage., 2017, 179:277-287. |
25 | 徐文波,李敏,罗德强,等.减氮对机插杂交籼稻产量及光合特性的影响[J].中国土壤与肥料,2021(6):189-196. |
XU W B, LI M, LUO D Q, et al.. Effect of nitrogen reduction on the yield and photosynthetic cCharacteristics of mechanical transplanting hybrid indica rice [J]. Soil Fert. Sci. China, 2021(6):189-196. | |
26 | 吕丽华,赵明,赵久然,等.不同施氮量下夏玉米冠层结构及光合特性的变化[J].中国农业科学,2008(9):2624-2632. |
LYU L H, ZHAO M, ZHAO J R, et al.. Canopy structure and photosynthesis of summer maize under different nitrogen fertilizer application rates [J]. Sci. Agric. Sin., 2008, 41(9):2624-2632. | |
27 | 赵凯男,张保军,王德梅,等.提高立体匀播冬小麦光合效能和产量的最佳追氮时期[J].植物营养与肥料学报,2019,25(8):1354-1361. |
ZHAO K N, ZHANG B J, WANG D M, et al.. Optimum nitrogen topdressing time for improving photosynthetic efficiency and yield of tridimensional uniform sowing winter wheat [J]. J. Plant Nutr. Fert., 2019, 25(8):1354-1361. | |
28 | 易媛,刘立伟,刘静,等.徐麦35高产高效增密减氮途径及其碳氮代谢调控机制[J].麦类作物学报,2021,41(7):857-865. |
YI Y, LIU L W, LIU J, et al.. Methods of high yield and high efficiency by density increase and nitrogen reductionin Xumai 35 and its regulation mechanism of carbon and nitrogen metabolism [J]. J. Triticeae Crops, 2021, 41(7):857-865. |
[1] | Yi DANG, Jianjun ZHANG, Gang ZHAO, Tinglu FAN, Lei WANG, Shangzhong LI, Gang ZHOU. Effects of Mixed Applying of Controlled-release Urea and Conventional Urea on Yield,Water and Nitrogen Utilization of Maize in Dryland [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2022, 24(6): 156-165. |
[2] | Yu FENG, Shujin QIU, Xiangyang YUAN, Qingliang CUI, Zhiqiang JI. Research on Compression Mechanical Characteristics of Sorghum Grains [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2022, 24(5): 102-110. |
[3] | Xin WANG, Yuxia ZHANG, Weidong CHEN, Congying LIN, Wenhui HOU, Guleng SIRI, Baiming CONG. Effects of Nitrogen Topdressing on Yield and Photosynthetic Fluorescence Characteristics of Different Forage Oat Varieties [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2022, 24(5): 170-179. |
[4] | Hui LIU, Jiezeng JIANG, Hao ZHANG, Yongxian ZHANG, Jiayu QIAN, Dongsheng LI, Yan LYU, Huanrui WU. Effects of Straw Mulching on Shallow Water Soil on Alleviating Soil Salinization and Growth of Aquatic Vegetables [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2022, 24(5): 202-208. |
[5] | Liuxi YI, Rula SA, Xin FAN, Can ZHAO, Ru LI, Bateer SIQIN. Evaluation of Flax Germplasm Phenotype [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2022, 24(5): 56-67. |
[6] | Yuan YI, Huiyun ZHANG, Liwei LIU, Jing WANG, Xuecheng ZHU, Na ZHAO, Guohua FENG. Effects of Slow-released Fertilizer Compound Humic Acid Instead of Urea on Grain Yield and Population Quality in Xumai New Varieties [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2022, 24(4): 144-153. |
[7] | Fangling WANG, Mingyue ZHANG, Yaru ZHOU, Qinglin GUAN, Xinyan LI, Qiu ZHONG, Mingqin ZHAO. Effect of TS-PAA Water Retaining Agent on Growth and Photosynthetic Characteristics of Cigar under Drought Stress [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2022, 24(4): 162-172. |
[8] | Guanglei CHENG, Jun QIU, Xiaoguang WANG, Tianjun XU, Chuanyong CHEN, Chunyuan ZHANG, Qianqian XIA, Yuanqi WU, Jiuran ZHAO, Ronghuan WANG. Changes of Agronomic Traits, Biomass Yield and Quality of National Silage Maize Combinations (Varieties) [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2022, 24(4): 30-37. |
[9] | Tianming QI, Zhijian LI, Peiyou QIN, Guixing REN, Bangwei ZHOU. Research and Application Prospect of Quinoa Cultivation Technology [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2022, 24(3): 157-165. |
[10] | Linlin DONG, Jinfang ZHA, Mingxing SHEN, Haihou WANG, Linlin SHI, Yueyue TAO, Xinwei ZHOU, Changying LU. Effect of Long-term Straw Returning on Soil Organic Carbon Fractions Composition in Rice-Wheat Rotation Ecosystem [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2022, 24(3): 166-175. |
[11] | Zhenjia HE, Wangtao FAN, Yichun DU, Qilong WANG. Effects of Water and Fertilizer Coupling on the Physical and Chemical Properties of Rice Soil and Yield Based on Soil Organic Reconstruction [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2022, 24(3): 176-185. |
[12] | Peng ZHONG, Lili MIAO, Jie LIU, Jianli WANG, Haiyan LU, Hongjiu YU, Nan ZHANG. Effect of Different Planting Densities and Patterns on Population Structure and Yield of Cyperusesculentus [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2022, 24(3): 186-196. |
[13] | Yunping DONG, Yuzhou LONG, Xingjun LIN, Lizhen MO, Huakang ZHU, Qingyun ZHAO, Yan SUN. Effect of Different Fertilizer Applications on Yield, Quality and Economic Benefit of CoffeaArabica L. [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2022, 24(3): 197-203. |
[14] | Qijun BAO, Yongdong PAN, Huayu ZHANG, Xiaoning LIU, Dongjia ZHANG, Feng ZHAO, Xiaoxia NIU, Jun CHEN. Analysis of Agronomic and Quality Characters of Beer Barley from Gansu and Europe, North America [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2022, 24(3): 57-66. |
[15] | Xin XU, Zhaowu MA, Shuping XIONG, Xinming MA, Tao CHENG, Haiyang LI, Jinpeng ZHAO. Wheat Yield Forecast in Henan Province Based on Climate Year Type [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2022, 24(2): 136-144. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||