Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology ›› 2022, Vol. 24 ›› Issue (5): 170-179.DOI: 10.13304/j.nykjdb.2021.0067
• BIO-MANUFACTURING & RESOURCE AND ECOLOGY • Previous Articles
Xin WANG1(), Yuxia ZHANG1(), Weidong CHEN1, Congying LIN1, Wenhui HOU1, Guleng SIRI1, Baiming CONG2
Received:
2021-01-19
Accepted:
2021-06-01
Online:
2022-05-15
Published:
2022-06-06
Contact:
Yuxia ZHANG
王鑫1(), 张玉霞1(), 陈卫东1, 林聪颖1, 候文慧1, 斯日古楞1, 丛百明2
通讯作者:
张玉霞
作者简介:
王鑫 E-mail 1466501390@qq.com;
基金资助:
CLC Number:
Xin WANG, Yuxia ZHANG, Weidong CHEN, Congying LIN, Wenhui HOU, Guleng SIRI, Baiming CONG. Effects of Nitrogen Topdressing on Yield and Photosynthetic Fluorescence Characteristics of Different Forage Oat Varieties[J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2022, 24(5): 170-179.
王鑫, 张玉霞, 陈卫东, 林聪颖, 候文慧, 斯日古楞, 丛百明. 追施氮肥对不同饲用燕麦品种产量及光合荧光特性的影响[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2022, 24(5): 170-179.
处理 Treatment | 燕王 Yanwang | 牧王 Muwang | 甜燕1号 Tianyan 1 | 牧乐思 Mulesi |
---|---|---|---|---|
N0 | 4 351.34±49.91 dβ | 5 245.28±30.91 dα | 4 062.13±81.89 dγ | 2 857.10±94.62 dδ |
N100 | 9 707.35±42.42 cα | 7 759.18±72.4 cγ | 9 543.52±34.4 cβ | 6 239.94±65.82 cδ |
N200 | 1 1281.1±25.37 aβ | 11 460.41±16.51 aα | 9 726.71±33.38 bγ | 8 844.84±57.26 bδ |
N300 | 10 442.26±44.2 bδ | 10 841.29±49.85 bγ | 11 786.12±95.85 aβ | 12 364.98±58.02 aα |
Table 1 Yield of different forage oat varieties under different nitrogen application levels
处理 Treatment | 燕王 Yanwang | 牧王 Muwang | 甜燕1号 Tianyan 1 | 牧乐思 Mulesi |
---|---|---|---|---|
N0 | 4 351.34±49.91 dβ | 5 245.28±30.91 dα | 4 062.13±81.89 dγ | 2 857.10±94.62 dδ |
N100 | 9 707.35±42.42 cα | 7 759.18±72.4 cγ | 9 543.52±34.4 cβ | 6 239.94±65.82 cδ |
N200 | 1 1281.1±25.37 aβ | 11 460.41±16.51 aα | 9 726.71±33.38 bγ | 8 844.84±57.26 bδ |
N300 | 10 442.26±44.2 bδ | 10 841.29±49.85 bγ | 11 786.12±95.85 aβ | 12 364.98±58.02 aα |
项目 Item | 处理 Treatment | 燕王 Yanwang | 牧王 Muwang | 甜燕1号 Tianyan 1 | 牧乐思 Mulesi |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
叶绿素a Chlorophyll a | N0 | 0.91±0.20 dδ | 1.01±0.68 dγ | 1.31±0.08 dα | 1.15±0.46 cβ |
N100 | 1.58±0.33 cβ | 1.36±0.18 cγ | 1.54±0.20 cβ | 1.67±0.10 bα | |
N200 | 2.23±0.37 aα | 1.98±0.44 aγ | 2.27±0.18 aα | 2.07±0.25 aβ | |
N300 | 2.13±0.17 bα | 1.83±0.28 bβ | 1.64±0.40 bγ | 1.66±0.36 bγ | |
叶绿素b Chlorophyll b | N0 | 0.53±0.01 dδ | 0.61±0.01 dγ | 0.80±0.02 dα | 0.74±0.04 dβ |
N100 | 0.96±0.01 cγ | 0.84±0.01 cδ | 0.99±0.01 cβ | 1.09±0.01 cα | |
N200 | 1.41±0.01 aβ | 1.20±0.03 aγ | 1.54±0.01 aα | 1.41±0.02 bβ | |
N300 | 1.34±0.02 bβ | 1.16±0.01 bγ | 1.08±0.03 bδ | 1.48±0.02 aα | |
类胡萝卜素 Carotenoids | N0 | 0.79±0.13 cα | 0.68±0.17 aα | 0.65±0.02 aα | 0.60±0.03 cα |
N100 | 1.02±0.01 bα | 0.71±0.17 aβ | 0.77±0.19 aβ | 0.71±0.07 bcβ | |
N200 | 1.40±0.12 aα | 0.75±0.12 aβ | 0.78±0.01 aβ | 1.21±0.09 aα | |
N300 | 1.02±0.05 bα | 0.74±0.03 aβ | 0.68±0.04 aβ | 0.87±0.05 bαβ |
Table 2 Chlorophyll and carotenoids content of different forage oat varieties under different nitrogen treatment levels (mg·g-1)
项目 Item | 处理 Treatment | 燕王 Yanwang | 牧王 Muwang | 甜燕1号 Tianyan 1 | 牧乐思 Mulesi |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
叶绿素a Chlorophyll a | N0 | 0.91±0.20 dδ | 1.01±0.68 dγ | 1.31±0.08 dα | 1.15±0.46 cβ |
N100 | 1.58±0.33 cβ | 1.36±0.18 cγ | 1.54±0.20 cβ | 1.67±0.10 bα | |
N200 | 2.23±0.37 aα | 1.98±0.44 aγ | 2.27±0.18 aα | 2.07±0.25 aβ | |
N300 | 2.13±0.17 bα | 1.83±0.28 bβ | 1.64±0.40 bγ | 1.66±0.36 bγ | |
叶绿素b Chlorophyll b | N0 | 0.53±0.01 dδ | 0.61±0.01 dγ | 0.80±0.02 dα | 0.74±0.04 dβ |
N100 | 0.96±0.01 cγ | 0.84±0.01 cδ | 0.99±0.01 cβ | 1.09±0.01 cα | |
N200 | 1.41±0.01 aβ | 1.20±0.03 aγ | 1.54±0.01 aα | 1.41±0.02 bβ | |
N300 | 1.34±0.02 bβ | 1.16±0.01 bγ | 1.08±0.03 bδ | 1.48±0.02 aα | |
类胡萝卜素 Carotenoids | N0 | 0.79±0.13 cα | 0.68±0.17 aα | 0.65±0.02 aα | 0.60±0.03 cα |
N100 | 1.02±0.01 bα | 0.71±0.17 aβ | 0.77±0.19 aβ | 0.71±0.07 bcβ | |
N200 | 1.40±0.12 aα | 0.75±0.12 aβ | 0.78±0.01 aβ | 1.21±0.09 aα | |
N300 | 1.02±0.05 bα | 0.74±0.03 aβ | 0.68±0.04 aβ | 0.87±0.05 bαβ |
荧光参数 Fluorescence parameter | 处理 Treatment | 燕王 Yanwang | 牧王 Muwang | 甜燕1号 Tianyan 1 | 牧乐思 Mulesi |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Fv/Fm | N0 | 0.71±0.01 bαβ | 0.66±0.05 bβ | 0.72±0.02 bα | 0.74±0.06 bα |
N100 | 0.78±0.01 aα | 0.77±0.02 aα | 0.79±0.01 aα | 0.78±0.01 abα | |
N200 | 0.79±0.01 aα | 0.81±0.01 aα | 0.79±0.01 aα | 0.78±0.03 abα | |
N300 | 0.77±0.01 aβ | 0.79±0.02 aαβ | 0.79±0.01 aαβ | 0.81±0.02 aα | |
ФPSⅡ | N0 | 0.65±0.01 bα | 0.61±0.01 aβ | 0.59±0.02 bβ | 0.52±0.01 cγ |
N100 | 0.68±0.05 abα | 0.62±0.01 aβ | 0.63±0.03 aβ | 0.61±0.01 bβ | |
N200 | 0.71±0.02 aα | 0.64±0.21 aβ | 0.64±0.01 aβ | 0.66±0.01 aβ | |
N300 | 0.66±0.01 bα | 0.61±0.01 aβ | 0.61±0.01 abβ | 0.53±0.03 cγ | |
qP | N0 | 0.22±0.03 aα | 0.24±0.06 bα | 0.21±0.07 bα | 0.22±0.07 bα |
N100 | 0.23±0.01 aβ | 0.31±0.01 aα | 0.31±0.04 aα | 0.31±0.02 aα | |
N200 | 0.24±0.08 aβ | 0.32±0.02 aα | 0.35±0.04 aα | 0.32±0.02 aα | |
N300 | 0.22±0.02 aβ | 0.31±0.01 aα | 0.21±0.02 bα | 0.24±0.03 bβ | |
NPQ | N0 | 2.42±0.07 aβ | 2.31±0.08 aγ | 2.44±0.05 aβ | 2.66±0.07 aα |
N100 | 1.73±0.08 bγ | 1.74±0.02 cγ | 2.21±0.08 bα | 2.11±0.03 bβ | |
N200 | 1.56±0.08 cδ | 1.63±0.06 dγ | 1.74±0.11 dβ | 1.81±0.09 cα | |
N300 | 1.67±0.06 bγ | 2.05±0.03 bα | 2.01±0.07 cα | 1.85±0.07 cβ |
Table 3 Fluorescence coefficients of different forage oat varieties under different nitrogen application levels
荧光参数 Fluorescence parameter | 处理 Treatment | 燕王 Yanwang | 牧王 Muwang | 甜燕1号 Tianyan 1 | 牧乐思 Mulesi |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Fv/Fm | N0 | 0.71±0.01 bαβ | 0.66±0.05 bβ | 0.72±0.02 bα | 0.74±0.06 bα |
N100 | 0.78±0.01 aα | 0.77±0.02 aα | 0.79±0.01 aα | 0.78±0.01 abα | |
N200 | 0.79±0.01 aα | 0.81±0.01 aα | 0.79±0.01 aα | 0.78±0.03 abα | |
N300 | 0.77±0.01 aβ | 0.79±0.02 aαβ | 0.79±0.01 aαβ | 0.81±0.02 aα | |
ФPSⅡ | N0 | 0.65±0.01 bα | 0.61±0.01 aβ | 0.59±0.02 bβ | 0.52±0.01 cγ |
N100 | 0.68±0.05 abα | 0.62±0.01 aβ | 0.63±0.03 aβ | 0.61±0.01 bβ | |
N200 | 0.71±0.02 aα | 0.64±0.21 aβ | 0.64±0.01 aβ | 0.66±0.01 aβ | |
N300 | 0.66±0.01 bα | 0.61±0.01 aβ | 0.61±0.01 abβ | 0.53±0.03 cγ | |
qP | N0 | 0.22±0.03 aα | 0.24±0.06 bα | 0.21±0.07 bα | 0.22±0.07 bα |
N100 | 0.23±0.01 aβ | 0.31±0.01 aα | 0.31±0.04 aα | 0.31±0.02 aα | |
N200 | 0.24±0.08 aβ | 0.32±0.02 aα | 0.35±0.04 aα | 0.32±0.02 aα | |
N300 | 0.22±0.02 aβ | 0.31±0.01 aα | 0.21±0.02 bα | 0.24±0.03 bβ | |
NPQ | N0 | 2.42±0.07 aβ | 2.31±0.08 aγ | 2.44±0.05 aβ | 2.66±0.07 aα |
N100 | 1.73±0.08 bγ | 1.74±0.02 cγ | 2.21±0.08 bα | 2.11±0.03 bβ | |
N200 | 1.56±0.08 cδ | 1.63±0.06 dγ | 1.74±0.11 dβ | 1.81±0.09 cα | |
N300 | 1.67±0.06 bγ | 2.05±0.03 bα | 2.01±0.07 cα | 1.85±0.07 cβ |
Fig.1 Pn of different forage oat varieties under different nitrogen treatmentNote: Different English letters indicate significant difference among different treatments of the same variety (P<0.05); different Greek letters indicate significant difference among different varieties of the same treatment (P<0.05).
Fig.2 Gs of different forage oat varieties under different nitrogen application levelsNote: Different English letters indicate significant difference among different treatments of the same variety (P<0.05); different Greek letters indicate significant difference among different varieties of the same treatment (P<0.05).
Fig. 3 Ci of different oat varieties under different nitrogen treatmentNote: Different English letters indicate significant difference among different treatments of the same variety (P<0.05); different Greek letters indicate significant difference among different varieties of the same treatment (P<0.05).
Fig.4 Tr of different forage oat varieties under different nitrogen treatmentNote: Different English letters indicate significant difference among different treatments of the same variety (P<0.05); different Greek letters indicate significant difference among different varieties of the same treatment (P<0.05).
指标 Index | 产量 Yield | 叶绿素a Chlorophyll a | 叶绿素b Chlorophyll b | 类胡萝卜素 Carotenoids |
---|---|---|---|---|
产量Yield | 1 | |||
叶绿素a Chlorophyll a | 0.74** | 1 | ||
叶绿素b Chlorophyll b | 0.77** | 0.94** | 1 | |
类胡萝卜素 Carotenoids | 0.45 | 0.60* | 0.56* | 1 |
Table 4 Correlation analysis of yield and content of chloroplast and carotenoids
指标 Index | 产量 Yield | 叶绿素a Chlorophyll a | 叶绿素b Chlorophyll b | 类胡萝卜素 Carotenoids |
---|---|---|---|---|
产量Yield | 1 | |||
叶绿素a Chlorophyll a | 0.74** | 1 | ||
叶绿素b Chlorophyll b | 0.77** | 0.94** | 1 | |
类胡萝卜素 Carotenoids | 0.45 | 0.60* | 0.56* | 1 |
指标 Index | 产量 Yield | Fv/Fm | ФPSⅡ | qP | NPQ |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
产量Yield | 1 | ||||
Fv/Fm | 0.80** | 1 | |||
ФPSⅡ | 0.33 | 0.12 | 1 | ||
qP | 0.26 | 0.44 | 0.17 | 1 | |
NPQ | -0.81** | -0.66** | -0.59* | -0.36 | 1 |
Table 5 Correlation analysis of yield and fluorescence parameter index
指标 Index | 产量 Yield | Fv/Fm | ФPSⅡ | qP | NPQ |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
产量Yield | 1 | ||||
Fv/Fm | 0.80** | 1 | |||
ФPSⅡ | 0.33 | 0.12 | 1 | ||
qP | 0.26 | 0.44 | 0.17 | 1 | |
NPQ | -0.81** | -0.66** | -0.59* | -0.36 | 1 |
指标 Index | 产量 Yield | Pn | Gs | Ci | Tr |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
产量 Yield | 1 | ||||
Pn | 0.31 | 1 | |||
Gs | 0.45 | 0.61** | 1 | ||
Ci | -0.36 | -0.41 | -0.44 | 1 | |
Tr | 0.53* | 0.47 | 0.81** | -0.37 | 1 |
Table 6 Correlation analysis of yield and photosynthetic index
指标 Index | 产量 Yield | Pn | Gs | Ci | Tr |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
产量 Yield | 1 | ||||
Pn | 0.31 | 1 | |||
Gs | 0.45 | 0.61** | 1 | ||
Ci | -0.36 | -0.41 | -0.44 | 1 | |
Tr | 0.53* | 0.47 | 0.81** | -0.37 | 1 |
1 | 鲍根生,周青平,韩志林.氮、钾不同配比施肥对燕麦产量和品质的影响[J].草业科学,2008(10):48-53. |
BAO G S, ZHOU Q P, HAN Z L. Effects of nitrogen and potassium fertilizer on yield and quality of oat [J]. Pratac. Sci., 2008(10): 48-53. | |
2 | 赵桂琴,慕平,魏黎明.饲用燕麦研究进展[J]. 草业学报, 2007(4):116-125. |
ZHAO G Q, MU P, WEI L M. Research progress in Avena sativa [J]. Acta Pratac. Sin., 2007(4): 116-125. | |
3 | 许大全.回忆光合作用研究五十年[J].植物生理学报,2016,52(11):1593-1608. |
Xu D Q. Memories of photosynthesis research for fifty years[J]. Acta Phytophysiol. Sin., 2016, 52(11): 1593-1608. | |
4 | MA B L, MORRISON K, MALCOM J, et al.. Canopy light reflectance and field greenness to assess nitrogen fertilization and yield of maize [J]. Agron. J., 1996(88): 915-920. |
5 | 刘瑞显,王友华,陈兵林,等.花铃期干旱胁迫下氮素水平对棉花光合作用与叶绿素荧光特性的影响[J].作物学报,2008,34(4):675-683. |
LIU R X, WANG Y H, CHEN B L, et al.. Effects of nitrogen levels on photosynthesis and chlorophyll fluorescence characteristics under drought stress in cotton flowering and boll-forming stage[J]. Acta Agron. Sin., 2008, 34(4): 675-683. | |
6 | 唐敏,翟秀明,李解,等.不同物候期茶树品种(系)叶绿素荧光特性研究[J].南方农业,2020,14(28):9-12. |
TANG M, ZHAI X M, LI J, et al.. Study on chlorophyll fluorescence characteristics of tea cultivars(lines) in different phenological stages [J]. South China Agric., 2020, 14(28): 9-12. | |
7 | 谭雪莲,郭天文,张国宏,等.氮素对小麦不同叶位叶片叶绿素荧光参数的调控效应[J].麦类作物学报,2009,29(3):437-441. |
TAN X L, GUO T W, ZHANG G H, et al.. Regulation of nitrogen level on chlorophyll fluorescence of wheat leaves at different positions [J]. J. Trit. Crops, 2009, 29(3): 437-441. | |
8 | KOU K H. Interspecific difference in the photosynthesis-ni-trogen relationship:patterns, physiological causes, and eco-logical importance [J]. J. Plant Res., 2004, 117: 481-494. |
9 | 于振文,潘庆民,姜东,等. 9 000 kg/公顷小麦施氮量与生理特性分析[J].作物学报,2003(1):37-43. |
YU Z W, PAN Q M, JIANG D, et al.. Analysis of the amount of nitrogen applied and physiological characteristics in wheat of the yield level of 9 000 kg per hectare [J]. Acta Agron. Sin., 2003(1): 37-43. | |
10 | 刘锁云,陈磊庆,胡廷会,等.水氮耦合对燕麦光合特性的影响[J].西北农业学报,2013,22(1):60-67. |
LIU S Y, CHEN L Q, HU T H, et al.. Effects of water-nitrogen coupling on photosynthetic characteristics of oat [J]. Acta Agric. Boreali-Occ. Sin., 2013, 22(1): 60-67. | |
11 | 王乐,张玉霞,于华荣,等.氮肥对沙地燕麦生长特性及产量的影响[J].草业科学,2017,34(7):1516-1521. |
WANG L, ZHANG Y X, YU H R, et al.. Effect of nitrogen fertilizer application on growth characteristics and yield of oats in sandy soil [J]. Pratac. Sci., 2017, 34(7): 1516-1521. | |
12 | 高阳,赵力兴,朱铁霞,等.施氮量对科尔沁沙地燕麦生物量及物质分配规律的影响[J].草地学报,2018,26(5):1168-1172. |
GAO Y, ZHAO L X, ZHU T X, et al.. Effects of nitrogen application rate on Avena sativa biomass and substance distribution in Horqin sandy land [J]. Acta Agres. Sin., 2018, 26(5): 1168-1172. | |
13 | 贾志锋,马祥,琚泽亮,等.施氮量和播种量对燕麦光合特性、激素含量及种子产量的影响[J].草地学报,2021,29(2):293-302. |
JIA Z F, MA X, JU Z L, et al.. Effects of nitrogen application rate and sowing rate on photosynthetic characteristics, phytohormone content and grain yield of oat [J]. Acta Agres. Sin., 2021, 29(2): 293-302. | |
14 | 邵冉冉.水氮耦合对燕麦生理特性及产量影响的研究[D].沈阳:辽宁大学,2020. |
SHAO R R. Effects of water and nitrogen coupling on physiological characteristics and yield of oats [D]. Shenyang: Liaoning University, 2020. | |
15 | 邹琦.植物生理学实验指导[M].北京:中国农业出版社,2000:72-74. |
ZOU Q. Experimental guidance of plant physiology [M]. Beijing: China Agriculture Press, 2000: 72-74. | |
16 | 朱兆良.推荐氮肥适宜施用量的方法论刍议[J].植物营养与肥料学报,2006,12(1):1-4. |
ZHU Z L. On the methodology of recommendation for the application rate of chemical fertilizer nitrogen to crops [J]. J. Plant Nutr. Fert., 2006, 12 (1):1-4. | |
17 | 李丹丹,陈静波,宗俊勤,等.施氮对Tifton85狗牙根光合特性的影响[J].草业科学,2017,34(3):472-478. |
LI D D, CHEN J B, ZONG J Q, et al.. Effects of nitrogen on photosynthetic characteristics of ‘Tifton85’ Bermudagrass [J]. Pratac. Sci., 2017, 34(3): 472-478. | |
18 | 高素玲,苗丰,陈建辉,等.氮素水平对旱作小麦光合特性的影响[J].华北农学报,2013,28(4):169-173. |
GAO S L, MIAO F, CHEN J H, et al.. Effects of nitrogen levels on photosynthetic characteristics of Triticum aestivum L.in dry farmland [J]. Acta Agric. Boreali-Sin., 2013, 28(4): 169-173. | |
19 | 德木其格,刘志萍,王磊,等.氮肥对大麦灌浆期叶片光合性能的影响及其相关性分析[J].作物杂志,2020(1):103-109. |
DEMUQIGE, LIU Z P, WANG L, et al.. Effect of nitrogen fertilizer on photosynthetic characteristics of barley during grain filling stage and its correlation analysis [J]. Crops, 2020(1): 103-109. | |
20 | 石正海,刘文辉,张永超,等.氮磷肥配施对西北羊茅开花期叶片光合特性日变化的影响[J].草业学报,2019,28(11):75-85. |
SHI Z H, LIU W H, ZHANG Y C, et al.. Effects of nitrogen and phosphorus fertilizers combined application on diurnal variations of leaves photosynthetic characteristics in Festuca kryloviana [J]. Pratac. Sci., 2019, 28(11): 75-85. | |
21 | 时丽冉.缺氮对小黑麦生长及叶绿素快速荧光动力学参数的影响[J].农业科技通讯,2019(6):56-59. |
Shi L R. Effects of nitrogen deficiency on triticale growth and rapid chlorophyll fluorescence kinetic parameters [J]. Bull. Agric. Sci. Tech., 2019(6): 56-59. | |
22 | LIN Y C, HU Y G, REN C Z, et al.. Effects of nitrogen application on chlorophyll fluorescence parameters and leaf gas exchange in naked oat [J]. J. Integ. Agric., 2013, 12(12): 2164-2171. |
23 | 蔡剑,邹薇,陈和,等.施氮水平对啤酒大麦叶片光合SPAD和叶绿素荧光特性的影响[J].麦类作物学报,2007(1):97-101, 171. |
CAI J, ZOU W, CHEN H, et al.. Effects of different nitrogen levels on photosynthetic characteristics and chlorophyll fluorescence of leaves in malting barley [J]. J. Trit. Crops, 2007(1): 97-101, 171. | |
24 | 武悦萱,张辉,王苗苗,等.氮磷配施对小麦生长、叶片叶绿素含量及叶绿素荧光特性的影响[J].江西农业学报,2020,32(2):9-15. |
WU Y X, ZHANG H, WANG M M, et al.. Effects of nitrogen and phosphorus application on leaf growth, chlorophyll content and chlorophyll fluorescence in wheat [J]. Acta Agric. Jiangxi, 2020, 32(2): 9-15. | |
25 | 尹勇刚,袁军伟,刘长江,等.NaCl胁迫对葡萄砧木光合特性与叶绿素荧光参数的影响[J].中国农业科技导报,2020,22(8):49-55. |
YIN Y G, YUAN J W, LIU C J, et al.. Effects of NaCl stress on leaf photosynthesis and chlorophyll fluorescence parameters of Vitis sp. rootstocks [J]. J. Agric. Sci. Tech., 2020, 22(8): 49-55. | |
26 | 王志龙,于亚雄,乔祥梅,等.密度和氮肥对云大麦12号产量、农艺性状及光合特性的影响[J].分子植物育种,2021,19(20):6884-6890. |
WANG Z L, YU Y X, QIAO X M, et al.. Effects of density and nitrogen fertilizer on the yield, agronomic traits and photosynthetic characteristics of Yundamai 12 [J]. Mol. Plant Breed., 2021, 19(20): 6884-6890. | |
27 | WALLENDAEL A, BONNETTE J, JUENGER T E, et al.. Geographic variation in the genetic basis of resistance to leaf rust between locally adapted ecotypes of the biofuel crop switchgrass (Panicum virgatum) [J]. New Phytol., 2020, 27(6): 1223-1238. |
28 | 李冬梅,吕新,罗宏海,等.基于叶绿素荧光参数的滴灌棉花氮素营养估测模型[J].棉花学报,2020,32(1):63-76. |
LI D M, LV X, LUO H H, et al.. A monitoring model of nitrogen nutrition of drip irrigation cotton based on chlorophyll fluorescence parameters [J]. Cotton Sci., 2020, 32(1): 63-76. | |
29 | 林世青,许春晖,张其德,等.叶绿素荧光动力学在植物抗性生理学、生态学和农业现代化中的应用[J].植物学通报,1992,9(1):1-16. |
LIN S Q, XU C H, ZHANG Q D, et al.. Some application of chlorophyll fluorescence kinetics to plant stress physiology and agricultural modernization [J]. China Bull. Bot., 1992, 9(1): 1-16. |
[1] | Yu FENG, Shujin QIU, Xiangyang YUAN, Qingliang CUI, Zhiqiang JI. Research on Compression Mechanical Characteristics of Sorghum Grains [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2022, 24(5): 102-110. |
[2] | Yuan YI, Huiyun ZHANG, Liwei LIU, Jing WANG, Xuecheng ZHU, Na ZHAO, Guohua FENG. Effects of Slow-released Fertilizer Compound Humic Acid Instead of Urea on Grain Yield and Population Quality in Xumai New Varieties [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2022, 24(4): 144-153. |
[3] | Fangling WANG, Mingyue ZHANG, Yaru ZHOU, Qinglin GUAN, Xinyan LI, Qiu ZHONG, Mingqin ZHAO. Effect of TS-PAA Water Retaining Agent on Growth and Photosynthetic Characteristics of Cigar under Drought Stress [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2022, 24(4): 162-172. |
[4] | Tianming QI, Zhijian LI, Peiyou QIN, Guixing REN, Bangwei ZHOU. Research and Application Prospect of Quinoa Cultivation Technology [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2022, 24(3): 157-165. |
[5] | Linlin DONG, Jinfang ZHA, Mingxing SHEN, Haihou WANG, Linlin SHI, Yueyue TAO, Xinwei ZHOU, Changying LU. Effect of Long-term Straw Returning on Soil Organic Carbon Fractions Composition in Rice-Wheat Rotation Ecosystem [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2022, 24(3): 166-175. |
[6] | Zhenjia HE, Wangtao FAN, Yichun DU, Qilong WANG. Effects of Water and Fertilizer Coupling on the Physical and Chemical Properties of Rice Soil and Yield Based on Soil Organic Reconstruction [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2022, 24(3): 176-185. |
[7] | Peng ZHONG, Lili MIAO, Jie LIU, Jianli WANG, Haiyan LU, Hongjiu YU, Nan ZHANG. Effect of Different Planting Densities and Patterns on Population Structure and Yield of Cyperusesculentus [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2022, 24(3): 186-196. |
[8] | Yunping DONG, Yuzhou LONG, Xingjun LIN, Lizhen MO, Huakang ZHU, Qingyun ZHAO, Yan SUN. Effect of Different Fertilizer Applications on Yield, Quality and Economic Benefit of CoffeaArabica L. [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2022, 24(3): 197-203. |
[9] | Qijun BAO, Yongdong PAN, Huayu ZHANG, Xiaoning LIU, Dongjia ZHANG, Feng ZHAO, Xiaoxia NIU, Jun CHEN. Analysis of Agronomic and Quality Characters of Beer Barley from Gansu and Europe, North America [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2022, 24(3): 57-66. |
[10] | Xin XU, Zhaowu MA, Shuping XIONG, Xinming MA, Tao CHENG, Haiyang LI, Jinpeng ZHAO. Wheat Yield Forecast in Henan Province Based on Climate Year Type [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2022, 24(2): 136-144. |
[11] | Baoshi LI, Wenke LIU, Qi WANG, Mingjie SHAO. Effect of Soil-ridged Substrate-embedded Cultivation on Root Zone Temperature, Growth and Yield of Cucumber in Chinese Solar Greenhouse in Summer [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2022, 24(2): 177-183. |
[12] | Xuan ZHOU, Pinling YANG, Jianwei PENG, Huiqing CHAI, Xuemei ZHONG, Xingrong KANG, Junyou LONG, Huiru ZHANG. Effects of Function Microbial Compound Fertilizer on Yield, Quality and Economic Benefit of Head Cabbage [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2022, 24(2): 184-192. |
[13] | Changjie CHEN, Lin MA, Yuhuan MIAO, Lanping GUO, Dahui LIU. Effects of Potassium Application on Growth, Yield and Quality of Artemisia argyi [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2022, 24(2): 201-209. |
[14] | Jian WANG, Ailing XU, Xiaodong WEI, Jilong XI, Na YANG, Ke WANG, Tianyuan XI, Jiancheng ZHANG. Risk Assessment of Spring Freezing Injury of Wheat at Different Sowing Dates in Yuncheng Basin [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2022, 24(1): 137-147. |
[15] | Zhidan WANG, Jili LIU, Na WU. Effects of Fenlong Tillage on Photosynthetic Physiological Characteristics and Yield of Sweet Sorghum [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2022, 24(1): 148-156. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||