Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology ›› 2022, Vol. 24 ›› Issue (2): 184-192.DOI: 10.13304/j.nykjdb.2020.0955
• BIO-MANUFACTURING & RESOURCE AND ECOLOGY • Previous Articles Next Articles
Xuan ZHOU1(), Pinling YANG2, Jianwei PENG2(
), Huiqing CHAI3, Xuemei ZHONG2, Xingrong KANG2, Junyou LONG2, Huiru ZHANG2
Received:
2020-11-12
Accepted:
2021-01-05
Online:
2022-02-15
Published:
2022-02-22
Contact:
Jianwei PENG
周旋1(), 杨嫔玲2, 彭建伟2(
), 柴慧清3, 钟雪梅2, 康兴蓉2, 龙俊佑2, 张慧茹2
通讯作者:
彭建伟
作者简介:
周旋 E-mail: zhouxuan_123@126.com;
基金资助:
CLC Number:
Xuan ZHOU, Pinling YANG, Jianwei PENG, Huiqing CHAI, Xuemei ZHONG, Xingrong KANG, Junyou LONG, Huiru ZHANG. Effects of Function Microbial Compound Fertilizer on Yield, Quality and Economic Benefit of Head Cabbage[J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2022, 24(2): 184-192.
周旋, 杨嫔玲, 彭建伟, 柴慧清, 钟雪梅, 康兴蓉, 龙俊佑, 张慧茹. 功能菌型复合肥减施对结球甘蓝产量、品质及经济效益的影响[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2022, 24(2): 184-192.
地点Site | pH | 有机质 Organic matter/ (g·kg-1) | 全氮 Total nitrogen/ (g·kg-1) | 碱解氮Available nitrogen/ (mg·kg-1) | 全磷 Total phosphorus/(g·kg-1) | 有效磷 Available phosphorus/(mg·kg-1) | 全钾 Total potassium/ (g·kg-1) | 速效钾 Available potassium/(mg·kg-1) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
浏阳露地 Liuyang open field | 5.24 | 28.85 | 1.78 | 136.41 | 9.53 | 48.82 | 12.15 | 146.31 |
益阳大棚 Yiyang greenhouse | 4.55 | 37.92 | 2.32 | 216.18 | 11.12 | 79.80 | 12.53 | 414.26 |
Table 1 Basic physical and chemical properties of soils
地点Site | pH | 有机质 Organic matter/ (g·kg-1) | 全氮 Total nitrogen/ (g·kg-1) | 碱解氮Available nitrogen/ (mg·kg-1) | 全磷 Total phosphorus/(g·kg-1) | 有效磷 Available phosphorus/(mg·kg-1) | 全钾 Total potassium/ (g·kg-1) | 速效钾 Available potassium/(mg·kg-1) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
浏阳露地 Liuyang open field | 5.24 | 28.85 | 1.78 | 136.41 | 9.53 | 48.82 | 12.15 | 146.31 |
益阳大棚 Yiyang greenhouse | 4.55 | 37.92 | 2.32 | 216.18 | 11.12 | 79.80 | 12.53 | 414.26 |
处理Treatment | 氮N | 磷P2O5 | 钾K2O |
---|---|---|---|
CF | 150.0 | 60.0 | 96.0 |
BF1 | 150.0 | 60.0 | 96.0 |
BF2 | 120.0 | 60.0 | 120.0 |
25%BF1 | 112.5 | 45.0 | 72.0 |
25%BF2 | 90.0 | 45.0 | 90.0 |
CK | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
Table 2 Fertilizer rates in the field experiment
处理Treatment | 氮N | 磷P2O5 | 钾K2O |
---|---|---|---|
CF | 150.0 | 60.0 | 96.0 |
BF1 | 150.0 | 60.0 | 96.0 |
BF2 | 120.0 | 60.0 | 120.0 |
25%BF1 | 112.5 | 45.0 | 72.0 |
25%BF2 | 90.0 | 45.0 | 90.0 |
CK | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
处理Treatment | 单株球重 Weight plant/kg | 净菜率 Rate/% | 球周长 Perimeter/cm | 球高 Height/cm | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
露地 Open field | 大棚 Greenhouse | 露地 Open field | 大棚 Greenhouse | 露地 Open field | 大棚 Greenhouse | 露地 Open field | 大棚 Greenhouse | |
CF | 0.98±0.07 ab | 1.21±0.15 ab | 58.72±4.86 a | 74.33±11.49 a | 62.55±1.75 ab | 60.55±2.12 ab | 17.77±0.19 a | 12.60±0.40 a |
BF1 | 1.03±0.04 ab | 1.43±0.13 ab | 61.12±6.37 a | 78.28±7.47 a | 63.78±2.96 ab | 61.38±0.36 ab | 17.78±1.31 a | 13.18±0.85 a |
BF2 | 1.14±0.14 a | 1.45±0.09 ab | 61.10±2.81 a | 76.54±7.01 a | 65.78±1.55 a | 61.97±0.70 ab | 17.97±0.82 a | 13.20±0.71 a |
25%BF1 | 1.16±0.13 a | 1.54±0.23 a | 61.75±4.22 a | 79.83±13.65 a | 64.78±0.62 a | 63.83±3.25 a | 18.00±0.25 a | 14.06±0.95 a |
25%BF2 | 1.10±0.02 a | 1.49±0.04 ab | 58.90±1.25 a | 77.01±8.12 a | 65.11±0.88 a | 62.64±0.22 ab | 17.79±0.23 a | 13.05±1.24 a |
CK | 0.82±0.04 b | 1.11±0.12 b | 54.76±0.31 a | 70.75±6.84 a | 57.89±2.63 b | 58.24±1.64 b | 16.43±0.25 a | 12.50±1.04 a |
平均Mean | 1.04 | 1.37 | 59.39 | 76.12 | 63.31 | 61.44 | 17.62 | 13.10 |
C | *** | *** | ns | *** | ||||
F | * | ns | * | ns | ||||
C×F | ns | ns | ns | ns |
Table 3 Growth characters of head cabbage under different fertilization treatments
处理Treatment | 单株球重 Weight plant/kg | 净菜率 Rate/% | 球周长 Perimeter/cm | 球高 Height/cm | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
露地 Open field | 大棚 Greenhouse | 露地 Open field | 大棚 Greenhouse | 露地 Open field | 大棚 Greenhouse | 露地 Open field | 大棚 Greenhouse | |
CF | 0.98±0.07 ab | 1.21±0.15 ab | 58.72±4.86 a | 74.33±11.49 a | 62.55±1.75 ab | 60.55±2.12 ab | 17.77±0.19 a | 12.60±0.40 a |
BF1 | 1.03±0.04 ab | 1.43±0.13 ab | 61.12±6.37 a | 78.28±7.47 a | 63.78±2.96 ab | 61.38±0.36 ab | 17.78±1.31 a | 13.18±0.85 a |
BF2 | 1.14±0.14 a | 1.45±0.09 ab | 61.10±2.81 a | 76.54±7.01 a | 65.78±1.55 a | 61.97±0.70 ab | 17.97±0.82 a | 13.20±0.71 a |
25%BF1 | 1.16±0.13 a | 1.54±0.23 a | 61.75±4.22 a | 79.83±13.65 a | 64.78±0.62 a | 63.83±3.25 a | 18.00±0.25 a | 14.06±0.95 a |
25%BF2 | 1.10±0.02 a | 1.49±0.04 ab | 58.90±1.25 a | 77.01±8.12 a | 65.11±0.88 a | 62.64±0.22 ab | 17.79±0.23 a | 13.05±1.24 a |
CK | 0.82±0.04 b | 1.11±0.12 b | 54.76±0.31 a | 70.75±6.84 a | 57.89±2.63 b | 58.24±1.64 b | 16.43±0.25 a | 12.50±1.04 a |
平均Mean | 1.04 | 1.37 | 59.39 | 76.12 | 63.31 | 61.44 | 17.62 | 13.10 |
C | *** | *** | ns | *** | ||||
F | * | ns | * | ns | ||||
C×F | ns | ns | ns | ns |
Fig.1 SPAD value of head cabbage at different growing stages under different fertilization treatmentsNote: Different lowercase letters at the same growing stage indicate significant differences between different treatments at P<0.05 level.
处理 Treatment | 单株鲜重 Fresh weight/(kg·plant-1) | 产量 Yield/(t·hm-2) | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
露地Open field | 大棚Greenhouse | 露地Open field | 大棚Greenhouse | |
CF | 1.68±0.07 ab | 1.65±0.08 ab | 50.29±1.97 ab | 99.03±4.53 ab |
BF1 | 1.71±0.13 ab | 1.83±0.08 ab | 51.30±3.87 ab | 110.00±4.61 ab |
BF2 | 1.85±0.15 a | 1.92±0.18 a | 55.50±4.54 a | 115.08±10.48 ab |
25%BF1 | 1.87±0.08 a | 1.94±0.05 a | 56.17±2.54 a | 116.50±2.75 a |
25%BF2 | 1.86±0.07 a | 1.96±0.14 a | 55.92±2.06 a | 117.75±8.33 a |
CK | 1.50±0.06 b | 1.58±0.10 b | 45.03±1.83 b | 94.57±6.36 b |
平均 Mean | 1.75 | 1.81 | 52.37 | 108.82 |
C | ns | *** | ||
F | ** | * | ||
C×F | ns | ns |
Table 4 Yields of head cabbage under different fertilization treatments
处理 Treatment | 单株鲜重 Fresh weight/(kg·plant-1) | 产量 Yield/(t·hm-2) | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
露地Open field | 大棚Greenhouse | 露地Open field | 大棚Greenhouse | |
CF | 1.68±0.07 ab | 1.65±0.08 ab | 50.29±1.97 ab | 99.03±4.53 ab |
BF1 | 1.71±0.13 ab | 1.83±0.08 ab | 51.30±3.87 ab | 110.00±4.61 ab |
BF2 | 1.85±0.15 a | 1.92±0.18 a | 55.50±4.54 a | 115.08±10.48 ab |
25%BF1 | 1.87±0.08 a | 1.94±0.05 a | 56.17±2.54 a | 116.50±2.75 a |
25%BF2 | 1.86±0.07 a | 1.96±0.14 a | 55.92±2.06 a | 117.75±8.33 a |
CK | 1.50±0.06 b | 1.58±0.10 b | 45.03±1.83 b | 94.57±6.36 b |
平均 Mean | 1.75 | 1.81 | 52.37 | 108.82 |
C | ns | *** | ||
F | ** | * | ||
C×F | ns | ns |
处理 Treatment | 维生素C含量 Vc content/(mg·kg-1) | 可溶性糖含量 Soluble sugar content/(g·kg-1) | 硝酸盐含量 Nitrate content/(mg·kg-1) | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
露地 Open field | 大棚 Greenhouse | 露地 Open field | 大棚 Greenhouse | 露地 Open field | 大棚 Greenhouse | |
CF | 231.04±10.45 ab | 167.29±23.64 ab | 21.59±1.99 ab | 24.47±2.25 ab | 163.05±16.91 a | 229.27±16.62 a |
BF1 | 269.98±22.87 ab | 184.77±15.71 ab | 24.23±3.36 ab | 25.65±0.89 ab | 140.91±6.31 ab | 187.25±7.46 ab |
BF2 | 274.36±40.25 ab | 228.57±25.57a | 22.41±0.64 ab | 25.10±3.12 ab | 143.52±6.55 ab | 185.48±23.18 ab |
25%BF1 | 278.77±7.55 a | 197.31±6.42 ab | 26.81±1.32 a | 28.44±3.89 a | 126.62±12.81 b | 176.87±13.14 b |
25%BF2 | 285.95±33.76a | 232.43±44.39a | 25.33±2.57 ab | 27.04±1.41 ab | 131.38±10.64 ab | 180.68±16.26 ab |
CK | 204.31±4.24 b | 139.03±8.26 b | 19.36±2.75b | 20.73±0.33b | 148.76±5.22 ab | 203.93±17.41 ab |
平均 Mean | 257.40 | 191.57 | 23.29 | 25.24 | 142.37 | 193.91 |
C | *** | ns | *** | |||
F | * | * | * | |||
C×F | ns | ns | ns |
Table 5 Qualities of head cabbage under different fertilization treatments
处理 Treatment | 维生素C含量 Vc content/(mg·kg-1) | 可溶性糖含量 Soluble sugar content/(g·kg-1) | 硝酸盐含量 Nitrate content/(mg·kg-1) | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
露地 Open field | 大棚 Greenhouse | 露地 Open field | 大棚 Greenhouse | 露地 Open field | 大棚 Greenhouse | |
CF | 231.04±10.45 ab | 167.29±23.64 ab | 21.59±1.99 ab | 24.47±2.25 ab | 163.05±16.91 a | 229.27±16.62 a |
BF1 | 269.98±22.87 ab | 184.77±15.71 ab | 24.23±3.36 ab | 25.65±0.89 ab | 140.91±6.31 ab | 187.25±7.46 ab |
BF2 | 274.36±40.25 ab | 228.57±25.57a | 22.41±0.64 ab | 25.10±3.12 ab | 143.52±6.55 ab | 185.48±23.18 ab |
25%BF1 | 278.77±7.55 a | 197.31±6.42 ab | 26.81±1.32 a | 28.44±3.89 a | 126.62±12.81 b | 176.87±13.14 b |
25%BF2 | 285.95±33.76a | 232.43±44.39a | 25.33±2.57 ab | 27.04±1.41 ab | 131.38±10.64 ab | 180.68±16.26 ab |
CK | 204.31±4.24 b | 139.03±8.26 b | 19.36±2.75b | 20.73±0.33b | 148.76±5.22 ab | 203.93±17.41 ab |
平均 Mean | 257.40 | 191.57 | 23.29 | 25.24 | 142.37 | 193.91 |
C | *** | ns | *** | |||
F | * | * | * | |||
C×F | ns | ns | ns |
处理 Treatment | 经济产值 Economic output/ (104 yuan·hm-2) | 生产成本 Production cost/ (104 yuan·hm-2) | 经济效益 Economic benefit/ (104 yuan·hm-2) | 产投比 Input-output ratio | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
露地 Open field | 大棚 Greenhouse | 露地 Open field | 大棚 Greenhouse | 露地 Open field | 大棚 Greenhouse | 露地 Open field | 大棚Greenhouse | |
CF | 5.03±0.20 ab | 9.90±0.45 ab | 1.12 | 1.87 | 3.91±0.08 ab | 8.03±0.08 b | 3.50±0.07 b | 4.30±0.05 b |
BF1 | 5.13±0.39 ab | 11.00±0.46 ab | 1.17 | 1.92 | 3.96±0.10 ab | 9.08±0.46 ab | 3.40±0.08 b | 4.74±0.24 ab |
BF2 | 5.55±0.45 a | 11.51±1.05 ab | 1.17 | 1.92 | 4.38±0.45 ab | 9.59±1.05 ab | 3.75±0.39 b | 5.00±0.54 ab |
25%BF1 | 5.62±0.25 a | 11.65±0.28 a | 1.12 | 1.87 | 4.50±0.25 a | 9.78±0.28 ab | 4.02±0.23 b | 5.23±0.15 ab |
25%BF2 | 5.59±0.21 a | 11.78±0.83 a | 1.12 | 1.87 | 4.47±0.21 ab | 9.91±0.83 a | 4.00±0.18 b | 5.30±0.44 a |
CK | 4.50±0.18 b | 9.46±0.64 b | 0.75 | 1.50 | 3.75±0.12 b | 7.96±0.30 b | 5.01±0.16 a | 5.30±0.20 a |
平均Mean | 5.24 | 10.88 | 1.07 | 1.82 | 4.16 | 9.06 | 3.95 | 4.98 |
ANOVA | ||||||||
C | *** | *** | *** | |||||
F | * | * | ** | |||||
C×F | ns | ns | ns |
Table 6 Economic benefits of head cabbage under different fertilization treatments
处理 Treatment | 经济产值 Economic output/ (104 yuan·hm-2) | 生产成本 Production cost/ (104 yuan·hm-2) | 经济效益 Economic benefit/ (104 yuan·hm-2) | 产投比 Input-output ratio | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
露地 Open field | 大棚 Greenhouse | 露地 Open field | 大棚 Greenhouse | 露地 Open field | 大棚 Greenhouse | 露地 Open field | 大棚Greenhouse | |
CF | 5.03±0.20 ab | 9.90±0.45 ab | 1.12 | 1.87 | 3.91±0.08 ab | 8.03±0.08 b | 3.50±0.07 b | 4.30±0.05 b |
BF1 | 5.13±0.39 ab | 11.00±0.46 ab | 1.17 | 1.92 | 3.96±0.10 ab | 9.08±0.46 ab | 3.40±0.08 b | 4.74±0.24 ab |
BF2 | 5.55±0.45 a | 11.51±1.05 ab | 1.17 | 1.92 | 4.38±0.45 ab | 9.59±1.05 ab | 3.75±0.39 b | 5.00±0.54 ab |
25%BF1 | 5.62±0.25 a | 11.65±0.28 a | 1.12 | 1.87 | 4.50±0.25 a | 9.78±0.28 ab | 4.02±0.23 b | 5.23±0.15 ab |
25%BF2 | 5.59±0.21 a | 11.78±0.83 a | 1.12 | 1.87 | 4.47±0.21 ab | 9.91±0.83 a | 4.00±0.18 b | 5.30±0.44 a |
CK | 4.50±0.18 b | 9.46±0.64 b | 0.75 | 1.50 | 3.75±0.12 b | 7.96±0.30 b | 5.01±0.16 a | 5.30±0.20 a |
平均Mean | 5.24 | 10.88 | 1.07 | 1.82 | 4.16 | 9.06 | 3.95 | 4.98 |
ANOVA | ||||||||
C | *** | *** | *** | |||||
F | * | * | ** | |||||
C×F | ns | ns | ns |
1 | 常梅.保护地黄瓜施用生物菌肥肥力效应研究[J].北方园艺,2013(4):177-178. |
CHANG M. Explore on fertility effects of applying biological bacterial fertilizer on cucumber in protected field [J]. Northern Hortic., 2013 (4):177-178. | |
2 | 黄绍文,唐继伟,李春花,等.我国蔬菜化肥减施潜力与科学施用对策[J].植物营养与肥料学报,2017,23(6):1480-1493. |
HUANG S W, TANG J W, LI C H, et al.. Reducing potential of chemical fertilizers and scientific fertilization countermeasure in vegetable production in China [J]. Plant Nutr. Fert. Sci., 2017, 23(6):1480-1493. | |
3 | 汤桂容,周旋,田昌,等.有机无机氮肥配施对蔬菜产量、品质及经济效益的影响[J].生态学杂志,2017,36(5):1292-1299. |
TANG G R, ZHOU X, TIAN C, et al.. Effects of combined application of organic and inorganic nitrogen fertilizers on yield, quality and economic benefit of vegetables [J]. Chin. J. Ecol., 2017, 36(5): 1292-1299. | |
4 | 汪新胜,陆玲,李拥军,等.有机肥与化肥配施对结球甘蓝生长特性、产量及品质的影响[J].湖北农业科学,2018,57(7):22-24. |
WANG X S, LU L, LI Y J, et al.. Effects of combined application of organic manure and chemical fertilizer on growth, yield and quality of the cabbage [J]. Hubei Agric. Sci., 2018, 57(7): 22-24. | |
5 | 杨丽梅,方智远,刘玉梅,等.“十一五”我国甘蓝遗传育种研究进展[J].中国蔬菜,2011,1(2):1-10. |
YANG L M, FANG Z Y, LIU Y M, et al.. Advances of research on cabbage genetics and breeding during “the eleventh five-year plan” in China [J]. China Veget., 2011, 1(2):1-10. | |
6 | 姚春霞,郭开秀,赵志辉,等.减量施肥对三种蔬菜硝酸盐含量、营养品质和生理特性的影响[J].水土保持学报,2010,24(4):153-156. |
YAO C X, GUO K X, ZHAO Z H, et al.. Effects of fertilizing decreasing on nitrate contents, nutritional quality and biological characteristics of three vegetables [J]. J. Soil Water Conserv., 2010, 24(4):153-156. | |
7 | 都韶婷,章永松,林咸永,等.蔬菜积累的硝酸盐及其对人体健康的影响[J].中国农业科学,2007, 40(9):2007-2014. |
DU S T, ZHANG Y S, LIN X Y, et al.. Accumulation of nitrate in vegetables and its possible implications to human health [J]. Sci. Agric. Sin., 2007, 40 (9):2007-2014. | |
8 | 梁颖,李艺,孙爱东,等.不同栽培方式对结球甘蓝营养成分的影响[J].农产品质量与安全,2019(4):73-77. |
LIANG Y, LI Y, SUN A D, et al.. Effects of different cultivation methods on nutrient composition of cabbage [J]. Qual. Saf. Agro-Prod., 2019 (4):73-77. | |
9 | 刘鹏,刘训理.中国微生物肥料的研究现状及前景展望[J].农学学报,2013,3(3):26-31. |
LIU P, LIU X L. Current research status and prospect of microbial fertilizer in China [J]. J. Agric., 2013, 3(3):26-31. | |
10 | 龙明华,于文进,唐小付,等.复合微生物肥料在无公害蔬菜栽培上的效应初报[J].中国蔬菜, 2002,1(5):4-6. |
LONG M H, YU W J, TANG X F, et al.. Preliminary studies on the effect of microbial-fertilizer on growing non-pollution vegetables [J]. China Veget., 2002, 1(5):4-6. | |
11 | 王冰清,尹能文,郑棉海,等.化肥减量配施有机肥对蔬菜产量和品质的影响[J].中国农学通报, 2012,28(1):242-247. |
WANG B Q, YIN N W, ZHENG M H, et al.. Effects of reduction of chemical fertilizer and organic manure supplement on vegetables yield and quality [J]. Chin. Agric. Sci. Bull., 2012, 28(1):242-247. | |
12 | 萧浪涛,王三根.植物生理学实验技术[M]. 北京:中国农业出版社,2005:1-262. |
XIAO L T, WANG S G. Experimental technol. plant physiology [M]. Beijing: China Agricultural Press, 2005:1-262. | |
13 | 庞强强,蔡兴来,周曼,等.微生物菌肥对设施白菜生长、品质和土壤酶活性的影响[J].热带农业科学,2018,38(4):20-23. |
PANG Q Q, CAI X L, ZHOU M, et al.. Effects of microbial fertilizer on the growth, quality and soil enzyme activities of pakchoi in the solar greenhouse [J]. Chin. J. Tropical Agric., 2018, 38(4):20-23. | |
14 | 牛振明.化肥减量及氮素形态配比对甘蓝养分吸收、产量和品质的影响[D].兰州:甘肃农业大学,2014. |
NIU Z M. Effects of reducing fertilizer and different nitrogen forms and proportion on nutrient uptake, yield and quality of cabbage [J]. Lanzhou: Gansu Agricultural University, 2014. | |
15 | 张凤华,廖文华,刘建玲.过量施用氮磷和有机肥对大白菜产量和氮磷吸收的影响[J].中国土壤与肥料,2009(4):60-63. |
ZHANG F H, LIAO W H, LIU J L. Effect of yield response and intaking nutritions of Chinese cabbage to excessive applying N, P and organic fertilizer [J]. China Soils Fert., 2009(4):60-63. | |
16 | 李淑仪,郑惠典,廖新荣,等.蔬菜施不同肥料对产量和土壤肥力的贡献[J].生态环境,2005,14(2):266-270. |
LI S Y, ZHENG H D, LIAO X R, et al.. Effects of different manure fertilizers on yield of vegetable and on soil fertility [J]. Ecol. Environ., 2005, 14(2):266-270. | |
17 | 张海波,张晓璟,徐卫红,等.减量化肥与有机材料配施对大头菜产量品质的影响[J].西南大学学报(自然科学版),2011,33(4):36-41. |
ZHANG H B, ZHANG X J, XU W H, et al.. Effect of reduced rate of chemical fertilizer applied in combination with organic material on the yield and quality of rutabaga (Brassicanapobrassica L.) [J]. J. Southwest Univ. (Nat. Sci.), 2011, 33(4): 36-41. | |
18 | 文静,张杰,李家慧.化肥减量生物有机复合肥对莴笋产量和品质的影响[J].北方园艺,2017(4):151-155. |
WEN J, ZHANG J, LI J H. Effect of chemical fertilizer reduced and bioorganic compound fertilizer improved on the yield and quality of lettuce [J]. Northern Hortic., 2017(4):151-155. | |
19 | 吕爱英,王永歧,沈阿林,等.6种微生物肥料在不同作物上的应用效果[J].河南农业科学,2004(4):49-51. |
LV A Y, WANG Y Q, SHEN A L, et al.. Application effect of six kinds of microbial fertilizers on different crops [J]. Henan Agric. Sci., 2004(4):49-51. | |
20 | 朱小芳,马怜森,程炳林.农天使牌复合微生物肥料在中晚熟大白菜上应用效果研究[J].上海农业科技,2005(4):78-79. |
21 | 钱咏梅,王洪泉.“丰禾”复合生物菌肥在意大利生菜上的试验研究[J].中国园艺文摘,2012,28(4):22-24. |
22 | 连宾,臧金平,袁生.微生物肥料科学研究中几个热点问题[J].南京师大学报(自然科学版),2004,27(2):65-69. |
LIAN B, ZANG J P, YUAN S. Several hot problems analysis of microbiological fertilizer research [J]. J. Nanjing Normal Univ. (Nat. Sci.), 2004, 27 (2):65-69. | |
23 | 周旋,丁俊山,吴良欢,等.不同工艺复合肥对小白菜产量和品质的影响[J].浙江大学学报(农业与生命科学版),2016,42(5):626-636. |
ZHOU X, DING J S, WU L H, et al.. Effects of compound fertilizer by different processes on yield and quality of pakchoi (Brassicachinensisi L.) [J]. J. Zhejiang Univ. (Agric. Life Sci.), 2016, 42(5):626-636. | |
24 | 王强,姜丽娜,符建荣,等.氮素形态、用量及施用时期对小青菜产量和硝酸盐含量的影响[J].植物营养与肥料学报,2008,14(1):126-131. |
WANG Q, JIANG L N, FU J R, et al.. Effects of form, rate and time of N fertilizer application on yield and nitrate content of greengrocery [J]. Plant Nutr. Fert. Sci., 2008, 14(1): 126-131. | |
25 | 刘遂飞,胡伟.施肥对辣椒产量、品质及其硝酸盐含量的影响[J].长江蔬菜,2009(18):56-58. |
LIU S F, HU W. Effect of different modes of fertilizing on capsicum yield, quality and nitrate content [J]. J. Changjiang Veget., 2009 (18): 56-58. | |
26 | 郝小雨,高伟,王玉军,等.有机无机肥料配合施用对设施番茄产量、品质及土壤硝态氮淋失的影响[J].农业环境科学学报,2012,31(3):538-547. |
HAO X Y, GAO W, WANG Y J, et al.. Effects of combined application of organic manure and chemical fertilizers on yield and quality of tomato and soil nitrate leaching loss under greenhouse condition [J]. J. Agro-Environ. Sci., 2012, 31(3):538-547. | |
27 | 王明友,李光忠,杨秀凤,等.微生物菌肥对保护地黄瓜生育及产量、品质的影响研究初报[J].土壤肥料,2003(3):38-41. |
WANG M Y, LI G Z, YANG X F, et al.. Primary report of the study on biological bacterial manure influencing the cucumber yield and quality in protective field [J]. Soil Fert., 2003(3):38-41. | |
28 | 徐志峰,王旭辉,丁亚欣,等.生物菌肥在农业生产中的应用[J].现代农业科技,2010(5):269-270. |
[1] | Xin XU, Zhaowu MA, Shuping XIONG, Xinming MA, Tao CHENG, Haiyang LI, Jinpeng ZHAO. Wheat Yield Forecast in Henan Province Based on Climate Year Type [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2022, 24(2): 136-144. |
[2] | Baoshi LI, Wenke LIU, Qi WANG, Mingjie SHAO. Effect of Soil-ridged Substrate-embedded Cultivation on Root Zone Temperature, Growth and Yield of Cucumber in Chinese Solar Greenhouse in Summer [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2022, 24(2): 177-183. |
[3] | Changjie CHEN, Lin MA, Yuhuan MIAO, Lanping GUO, Dahui LIU. Effects of Potassium Application on Growth, Yield and Quality of Artemisia argyi [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2022, 24(2): 201-209. |
[4] | Wancang SUN, Xinwu PEI, Li MA, Xuefang WANG, Junyan WU, Xuecai LI, Yuanyuan PU, Lijun LIU, Peng CHAI, Xiaoze LI, Yujuan JIA, Jijun WANG, Fang LIU, Qixian CHEN, Jinxiong SHEN. Advances and Outlook of Winter Cover Crop Development Research in Northern China [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2022, 24(1): 128-136. |
[5] | Jian WANG, Ailing XU, Xiaodong WEI, Jilong XI, Na YANG, Ke WANG, Tianyuan XI, Jiancheng ZHANG. Risk Assessment of Spring Freezing Injury of Wheat at Different Sowing Dates in Yuncheng Basin [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2022, 24(1): 137-147. |
[6] | Zhidan WANG, Jili LIU, Na WU. Effects of Fenlong Tillage on Photosynthetic Physiological Characteristics and Yield of Sweet Sorghum [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2022, 24(1): 148-156. |
[7] | Xing LIU, Jitao WANG, Zhijun HU, Yan LIU, Xiaoguo MU, Haijun ZHANG, Dalin ZHANG, Lei AN, Lin YE. Effects of Planting Density and Feeding Frequency on Growth and Quality of Crucian Carp under Aquaponics System [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2022, 24(1): 192-201. |
[8] | HUANG Yulan§, LONG Shengfeng§, YE Xingzhi, LI Yanying, SHEN Zhangyou, ZHOU Jia, ZHOU Lingzhi, LAO Chengying, WEI Benhui. Study on the Agronomic Characters, Yield and Quality of Cassava in Enshi of Hubei Province [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2021, 23(9): 46-55. |
[9] | SUN Mengyao, XU Lanjun, LI Xiaolong, LI Chuanyou, CHEN Hua, ZHANG Chuanshuai, LIU Xingtao. Influences of Different Water-saving Methods on Water Utilization, Distribution and Yield of Rape [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2021, 23(9): 138-143. |
[10] | XI Min, XU Youzun, SUN Xueyuan, WU Wenge, ZHOU Yongjin. Effects of Nitrogen Fertilizer Topdressing on Grain Filling and Milling Quality of the Rice with High Grain Chalkiness [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2021, 23(9): 144-151. |
[11] | LI Shengmei, ZHANG Dawei, DILIBAIER Dilimaimaiti, WEI Xin, RUI Cun, YANG Tao, GENG Shiwei, GAO Wenwei. Influence of Reduced Irrigation on Agronomic Traits, Yield and Fiber Quality of Transgenic ScALDH21 Cotton [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2021, 23(9): 152-159. |
[12] | LIU Yuqian, LU Faguang, GU Lifeng, REN Zhen, SHI Yu, LU Haitong, XU Zhenran, ZHOU Guisheng, WANG Xiaoshan, ZHANG Wangding, REN Zhiqiang, ZHU Guanglong, . Study on High Yield Production Technology of Oat in Saline Soils of Coastal beach and Its Associated Physiological Basis [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2021, 23(9): 160-172. |
[13] | LI Chengchen, SUO Haicui, LUO Huanming, AN Kang, LIU Jitao, WANG Li, SHAN Jianwei, YANG Shaohai, LI Xiaobo. Effects of Reduced Fertilizer Application and Fertilization Methods on Potato Yield and Tuber Nitrogen Accumulation [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2021, 23(9): 173-182. |
[14] | LIU Yuanbo, WANG Jing, Zhu Xuejie, JIANG Weifeng, LIU Tian, ZHANG Jinzhong, LI Yaoxin, FU Yunpeng. Effects of Different Water and Fertilizer Management Modes on Nutrient Accumulation and Quality of Flue-cured Tobacco Leaves [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2021, 23(9): 193-201. |
[15] | YIN Yan, YIN Liang, ZHANG Xuekun, GUO Jingli, WANG Jijun. Status and Countermeasure of The High-quality Development of Rapeseed Industry in China [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2021, 23(8): 1-7. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||