Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology ›› 2022, Vol. 24 ›› Issue (1): 192-201.DOI: 10.13304/j.nykjdb.2021.0242
• MARINE AGRICULTURE & FRESHWATER FISHERIES • Previous Articles Next Articles
Xing LIU(), Jitao WANG, Zhijun HU, Yan LIU, Xiaoguo MU, Haijun ZHANG, Dalin ZHANG, Lei AN, Lin YE(
)
Received:
2021-03-23
Accepted:
2021-07-07
Online:
2022-01-15
Published:
2022-01-25
Contact:
Lin YE
刘星(), 王继涛, 虎治军, 刘艳, 穆晓国, 张海军, 张达林, 安磊, 叶林(
)
通讯作者:
叶林
作者简介:
刘星 Email:liuxing329@163.com;
基金资助:
CLC Number:
Xing LIU, Jitao WANG, Zhijun HU, Yan LIU, Xiaoguo MU, Haijun ZHANG, Dalin ZHANG, Lei AN, Lin YE. Effects of Planting Density and Feeding Frequency on Growth and Quality of Crucian Carp under Aquaponics System[J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2022, 24(1): 192-201.
刘星, 王继涛, 虎治军, 刘艳, 穆晓国, 张海军, 张达林, 安磊, 叶林. 鱼菜共生系统下种养密度和投喂频率对鲫鱼生长及品质的影响[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2022, 24(1): 192-201.
元素 Element | 含量Content/% | 元素 Element | 含量Content/% |
---|---|---|---|
粗蛋白 Crude protein | ≥36.0 | 总磷 Total phosphorus | ≥1.0 |
粗纤维Crude fiber | ≥8.5 | 钙Calcium | ≥0.5 |
粗脂肪Crude fat | ≥5.0 | 赖氨酸Lysine | ≥1.6 |
粗灰分Crude ash | ≥15.0 | 氯化钠 Sodium chloride | 0.3~1.5 |
Tab.1 Commercial fish food ingredients for the experiment
元素 Element | 含量Content/% | 元素 Element | 含量Content/% |
---|---|---|---|
粗蛋白 Crude protein | ≥36.0 | 总磷 Total phosphorus | ≥1.0 |
粗纤维Crude fiber | ≥8.5 | 钙Calcium | ≥0.5 |
粗脂肪Crude fat | ≥5.0 | 赖氨酸Lysine | ≥1.6 |
粗灰分Crude ash | ≥15.0 | 氯化钠 Sodium chloride | 0.3~1.5 |
处理 Treatment | A:生菜种植密度 Planting density/(plant·m-2) | B:鲫鱼养殖密度 Feeding density/(kg·m-3) | C:投喂频率 Feeding frequency/(meal·d-1) |
---|---|---|---|
T1 | 28 | 8 | 1 |
T2 | 28 | 10 | 2 |
T3 | 28 | 12 | 3 |
T4 | 42 | 8 | 2 |
T5 | 42 | 10 | 3 |
T6 | 42 | 12 | 1 |
T7 | 56 | 8 | 3 |
T8 | 56 | 10 | 1 |
T9 | 56 | 12 | 2 |
Table 2 Combination of experiment
处理 Treatment | A:生菜种植密度 Planting density/(plant·m-2) | B:鲫鱼养殖密度 Feeding density/(kg·m-3) | C:投喂频率 Feeding frequency/(meal·d-1) |
---|---|---|---|
T1 | 28 | 8 | 1 |
T2 | 28 | 10 | 2 |
T3 | 28 | 12 | 3 |
T4 | 42 | 8 | 2 |
T5 | 42 | 10 | 3 |
T6 | 42 | 12 | 1 |
T7 | 56 | 8 | 3 |
T8 | 56 | 10 | 1 |
T9 | 56 | 12 | 2 |
处理 Treatment | 溶解氧含量 DO content/(mg·L-1) | pH | 电导率 EC/(mS·cm-1) | 温度 Temperature/℃ |
---|---|---|---|---|
T1 | 9.31±0.30 | 7.92±0.17 | 0.33±0.01 | 22.70±0.66 |
T2 | 9.31±0.28 | 7.88±0.16 | 0.39±0.02 | 22.47±0.73 |
T3 | 9.12±0.30 | 7.85±0.17 | 0.40±0.02 | 22.90±0.60 |
T4 | 9.15±0.30 | 8.01±0.17 | 0.33±0.01 | 22.50±0.72 |
T5 | 9.23±0.30 | 7.89±0.18 | 0.40±0.02 | 24.30±0.61 |
T6 | 9.10±0.31 | 7.71±0.17 | 0.40±0.02 | 24.50±0.72 |
T7 | 9.25±0.32 | 7.85±0.18 | 0.31±0.02 | 23.00±0.83 |
T8 | 9.15±0.32 | 7.89±0.18 | 0.35±0.01 | 25.33±0.76 |
T9 | 9.13±0.35 | 7.91±0.19 | 0.37±0.01 | 23.47±0.79 |
Table 3 Content of dissolved oxygen、pH 、EC and temperature during culture period
处理 Treatment | 溶解氧含量 DO content/(mg·L-1) | pH | 电导率 EC/(mS·cm-1) | 温度 Temperature/℃ |
---|---|---|---|---|
T1 | 9.31±0.30 | 7.92±0.17 | 0.33±0.01 | 22.70±0.66 |
T2 | 9.31±0.28 | 7.88±0.16 | 0.39±0.02 | 22.47±0.73 |
T3 | 9.12±0.30 | 7.85±0.17 | 0.40±0.02 | 22.90±0.60 |
T4 | 9.15±0.30 | 8.01±0.17 | 0.33±0.01 | 22.50±0.72 |
T5 | 9.23±0.30 | 7.89±0.18 | 0.40±0.02 | 24.30±0.61 |
T6 | 9.10±0.31 | 7.71±0.17 | 0.40±0.02 | 24.50±0.72 |
T7 | 9.25±0.32 | 7.85±0.18 | 0.31±0.02 | 23.00±0.83 |
T8 | 9.15±0.32 | 7.89±0.18 | 0.35±0.01 | 25.33±0.76 |
T9 | 9.13±0.35 | 7.91±0.19 | 0.37±0.01 | 23.47±0.79 |
指标 Index | 因素Factor | 排序 Ranking | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
A | B | C | |||
增重量GW/g | K1 | 266.017 | 240.470 | 196.033 | C>A>B |
K2 | 227.167 | 224.293 | 240.540 | ||
K3 | 202.420 | 230.840 | 259.030 | ||
极差R | 63.597 | 16.177 | 62.997 | ||
P值P value | 0.025 | 0.813 | 0.022 | ||
最佳水平Best level | A1 | B1 | C3 | ||
增重率WGR/% | K1 | 52.904 | 57.536 | 39.812 | B>A>C |
K2 | 46.633 | 44.278 | 49.424 | ||
K3 | 40.669 | 38.392 | 50.969 | ||
极差R | 12.235 | 19.144 | 11.157 | ||
P值P value | 0.150 | 0.004 | 0.158 | ||
最佳水平Best level | A1 | B1 | C3 | ||
特定生长率SGR/(%·d-1) | K1 | 1.211 | 1.292 | 0.948 | B>A>C |
K2 | 1.077 | 1.040 | 1.133 | ||
K3 | 0.965 | 0.921 | 1.172 | ||
极差R | 0.246 | 0.371 | 0.224 | ||
P值P value | 0.128 | 0.004 | 0.143 | ||
最佳水平Best level | A1 | B1 | C3 |
Table 4 Range analysis of growth performance and yield range of crucian carp
指标 Index | 因素Factor | 排序 Ranking | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
A | B | C | |||
增重量GW/g | K1 | 266.017 | 240.470 | 196.033 | C>A>B |
K2 | 227.167 | 224.293 | 240.540 | ||
K3 | 202.420 | 230.840 | 259.030 | ||
极差R | 63.597 | 16.177 | 62.997 | ||
P值P value | 0.025 | 0.813 | 0.022 | ||
最佳水平Best level | A1 | B1 | C3 | ||
增重率WGR/% | K1 | 52.904 | 57.536 | 39.812 | B>A>C |
K2 | 46.633 | 44.278 | 49.424 | ||
K3 | 40.669 | 38.392 | 50.969 | ||
极差R | 12.235 | 19.144 | 11.157 | ||
P值P value | 0.150 | 0.004 | 0.158 | ||
最佳水平Best level | A1 | B1 | C3 | ||
特定生长率SGR/(%·d-1) | K1 | 1.211 | 1.292 | 0.948 | B>A>C |
K2 | 1.077 | 1.040 | 1.133 | ||
K3 | 0.965 | 0.921 | 1.172 | ||
极差R | 0.246 | 0.371 | 0.224 | ||
P值P value | 0.128 | 0.004 | 0.143 | ||
最佳水平Best level | A1 | B1 | C3 |
处理 Treatment | 初始质量 IBW/g | 末体质量 FBW/g | 成活率 SR/% | 增重量 GW/g | 增重率 WGR/% | 特定生长率 SGR/(%·d-1) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
T1 | 412.67±10.74 c | 642.49±18.96 d | 100 | 229.82±12.73 abc | 55.72±3.00 a | 1.26±0.06 a |
T2 | 507.00±14.98 b | 771.67±13.89 b | 100 | 264.67±15.73 ab | 52.41±4.32 a | 1.20±0.08 a |
T3 | 601.67±9.53 a | 905.22±16.06 a | 100 | 303.56±23.00 a | 50.58±4.57 a | 1.17±0.09 a |
T4 | 415.00±7.02 c | 670.85±34.11 cd | 100 | 255.85±38.56 ab | 61.91±10.02 a | 1.37±0.18 a |
T5 | 503.33±12.02 b | 741.12±31.56 bc | 100 | 237.79±31.19 abc | 47.35±6.45 ab | 1.10±0.13 ab |
T6 | 612.67±10.9 a | 800.53±18.68 b | 100 | 187.86±8.540 bc | 30.64±0.96 b | 0.76±0.02 c |
T7 | 428.67±1.2 c | 664.40±26.47 d | 100 | 235.74±25.83 abc | 54.98±5.94 a | 1.25±0.11 a |
T8 | 516.33±12.17 b | 686.75±15.82 cd | 100 | 170.42±13.40 c | 33.07±2.84 b | 0.81±0.06 bc |
T9 | 593.00±3.51 a | 794.10±19.88 b | 100 | 201.10±23.02 bc | 33.96±4.05 b | 0.83±0.09 c |
Table 5 Growth performance and yield of crucian carp under different treatments
处理 Treatment | 初始质量 IBW/g | 末体质量 FBW/g | 成活率 SR/% | 增重量 GW/g | 增重率 WGR/% | 特定生长率 SGR/(%·d-1) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
T1 | 412.67±10.74 c | 642.49±18.96 d | 100 | 229.82±12.73 abc | 55.72±3.00 a | 1.26±0.06 a |
T2 | 507.00±14.98 b | 771.67±13.89 b | 100 | 264.67±15.73 ab | 52.41±4.32 a | 1.20±0.08 a |
T3 | 601.67±9.53 a | 905.22±16.06 a | 100 | 303.56±23.00 a | 50.58±4.57 a | 1.17±0.09 a |
T4 | 415.00±7.02 c | 670.85±34.11 cd | 100 | 255.85±38.56 ab | 61.91±10.02 a | 1.37±0.18 a |
T5 | 503.33±12.02 b | 741.12±31.56 bc | 100 | 237.79±31.19 abc | 47.35±6.45 ab | 1.10±0.13 ab |
T6 | 612.67±10.9 a | 800.53±18.68 b | 100 | 187.86±8.540 bc | 30.64±0.96 b | 0.76±0.02 c |
T7 | 428.67±1.2 c | 664.40±26.47 d | 100 | 235.74±25.83 abc | 54.98±5.94 a | 1.25±0.11 a |
T8 | 516.33±12.17 b | 686.75±15.82 cd | 100 | 170.42±13.40 c | 33.07±2.84 b | 0.81±0.06 bc |
T9 | 593.00±3.51 a | 794.10±19.88 b | 100 | 201.10±23.02 bc | 33.96±4.05 b | 0.83±0.09 c |
指标 Index | 因素 Factor | 排序Ranking | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
A | B | C | |||
摄食率FR/(%·d-1) | K1 | 1.278 | 1.487 | 1.328 | B>C>A |
K2 | 1.299 | 1.290 | 1.294 | ||
K3 | 1.317 | 1.116 | 1.272 | ||
极差R | 0.039 | 0.371 | 0.056 | ||
P值P value | 0.882 | 0.000 | 0.791 | ||
最佳水平Best level | A3 | B1 | C1 | ||
饲料系数FCR | K1 | 1.319 | 1.200 | 1.850 | B>A>C |
K2 | 1.644 | 1.648 | 1.545 | ||
K3 | 1.816 | 1.931 | 1.383 | ||
极差R | 0.497 | 0.731 | 0.467 | ||
P值P value | 0.083 | 0.002 | 0.114 | ||
最佳水平Best level | A1 | B1 | C3 | ||
蛋白质效率PER/% | K1 | 3.393 | 3.067 | 2.500 | C>A>B |
K2 | 2.898 | 2.861 | 3.068 | ||
K3 | 2.582 | 2.944 | 3.304 | ||
极差R | 0.811 | 0.206 | 0.804 | ||
P值P value | 0.025 | 0.816 | 0.023 | ||
最佳水平Best level | A1 | B1 | C3 |
Table 6 Range analysis of feed utilization range of crucian carp
指标 Index | 因素 Factor | 排序Ranking | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
A | B | C | |||
摄食率FR/(%·d-1) | K1 | 1.278 | 1.487 | 1.328 | B>C>A |
K2 | 1.299 | 1.290 | 1.294 | ||
K3 | 1.317 | 1.116 | 1.272 | ||
极差R | 0.039 | 0.371 | 0.056 | ||
P值P value | 0.882 | 0.000 | 0.791 | ||
最佳水平Best level | A3 | B1 | C1 | ||
饲料系数FCR | K1 | 1.319 | 1.200 | 1.850 | B>A>C |
K2 | 1.644 | 1.648 | 1.545 | ||
K3 | 1.816 | 1.931 | 1.383 | ||
极差R | 0.497 | 0.731 | 0.467 | ||
P值P value | 0.083 | 0.002 | 0.114 | ||
最佳水平Best level | A1 | B1 | C3 | ||
蛋白质效率PER/% | K1 | 3.393 | 3.067 | 2.500 | C>A>B |
K2 | 2.898 | 2.861 | 3.068 | ||
K3 | 2.582 | 2.944 | 3.304 | ||
极差R | 0.811 | 0.206 | 0.804 | ||
P值P value | 0.025 | 0.816 | 0.023 | ||
最佳水平Best level | A1 | B1 | C3 |
处理 Treatment | 摄食率 FR/(%·d-1) | 饲料系数 FCR/% | 蛋白质效率 PER/% |
---|---|---|---|
T1 | 1.52±0.04 a | 1.23±0.07 a | 2.93±0.16 abc |
T2 | 1.25±0.02 b | 1.33±0.08 a | 3.38±0.20 ab |
T3 | 1.06±0.01 c | 1.40±0.10 a | 3.87±0.29 a |
T4 | 1.48±0.04 a | 1.16±0.20 a | 3.26±0.49 ab |
T5 | 1.29±0.04 b | 1.53±0.23 a | 3.03±0.40 abc |
T6 | 1.13±0.02 c | 2.24±0.10 b | 2.40±0.11 bc |
T7 | 1.47±0.04 a | 1.22±0.15 a | 3.01±0.33 abc |
T8 | 1.33±0.03 b | 2.08±0.17 b | 2.17±0.17 c |
T9 | 1.15±0.01 c | 2.15±0.26 b | 2.57±0.29 bc |
Table 7 Feed utilization of crucian carp under different treatments
处理 Treatment | 摄食率 FR/(%·d-1) | 饲料系数 FCR/% | 蛋白质效率 PER/% |
---|---|---|---|
T1 | 1.52±0.04 a | 1.23±0.07 a | 2.93±0.16 abc |
T2 | 1.25±0.02 b | 1.33±0.08 a | 3.38±0.20 ab |
T3 | 1.06±0.01 c | 1.40±0.10 a | 3.87±0.29 a |
T4 | 1.48±0.04 a | 1.16±0.20 a | 3.26±0.49 ab |
T5 | 1.29±0.04 b | 1.53±0.23 a | 3.03±0.40 abc |
T6 | 1.13±0.02 c | 2.24±0.10 b | 2.40±0.11 bc |
T7 | 1.47±0.04 a | 1.22±0.15 a | 3.01±0.33 abc |
T8 | 1.33±0.03 b | 2.08±0.17 b | 2.17±0.17 c |
T9 | 1.15±0.01 c | 2.15±0.26 b | 2.57±0.29 bc |
指标 Index | 因素 Factor | 排序 Ranking | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
A | B | C | |||
肥满度 CF/% | K1 | 1.672 | 2.034 | 1.643 | C>A>B |
K2 | 2.017 | 1.96 | 1.742 | ||
K3 | 2.043 | 1.738 | 2.347 | ||
极差R | 0.371 | 0.296 | 0.704 | ||
P值P value | 0.516 | 0.696 | 0.092 | ||
最佳水平Best level | A3 | B1 | C3 | ||
肝体指数 HIS/% | K1 | 2.739 | 3.224 | 3.008 | A>C>B |
K2 | 4.198 | 3.223 | 2.901 | ||
K3 | 2.814 | 3.303 | 3.841 | ||
极差R | 1.459 | 0.08 | 0.94 | ||
P值P value | 0.069 | 0.992 | 0.371 | ||
最佳水平Best level | A2 | B3 | C3 | ||
脏体指数 VSI/% | K1 | 15.882 | 15.186 | 14.518 | C>A>B |
K2 | 16.907 | 16.287 | 15.852 | ||
K3 | 14.707 | 16.024 | 17.125 | ||
极差R | 2.2 | 1.101 | 2.607 | ||
P值P value | 0.181 | 0.642 | 0.084 | ||
最佳水平Best level | A2 | B3 | C3 |
Table 8 Range analysis of crucian carp body index
指标 Index | 因素 Factor | 排序 Ranking | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
A | B | C | |||
肥满度 CF/% | K1 | 1.672 | 2.034 | 1.643 | C>A>B |
K2 | 2.017 | 1.96 | 1.742 | ||
K3 | 2.043 | 1.738 | 2.347 | ||
极差R | 0.371 | 0.296 | 0.704 | ||
P值P value | 0.516 | 0.696 | 0.092 | ||
最佳水平Best level | A3 | B1 | C3 | ||
肝体指数 HIS/% | K1 | 2.739 | 3.224 | 3.008 | A>C>B |
K2 | 4.198 | 3.223 | 2.901 | ||
K3 | 2.814 | 3.303 | 3.841 | ||
极差R | 1.459 | 0.08 | 0.94 | ||
P值P value | 0.069 | 0.992 | 0.371 | ||
最佳水平Best level | A2 | B3 | C3 | ||
脏体指数 VSI/% | K1 | 15.882 | 15.186 | 14.518 | C>A>B |
K2 | 16.907 | 16.287 | 15.852 | ||
K3 | 14.707 | 16.024 | 17.125 | ||
极差R | 2.2 | 1.101 | 2.607 | ||
P值P value | 0.181 | 0.642 | 0.084 | ||
最佳水平Best level | A2 | B3 | C3 |
处理Treatment | 肥满度 CF | 肝体指数 HSI | 脏体指数 VSI |
---|---|---|---|
T1 | 1.60±0.07 a | 2.37±0.64 a | 14.07±0.77 b |
T2 | 1.68±0.02 a | 2.26±1.12 a | 16.68±0.63 ab |
T3 | 1.73±0.03 a | 3.59±0.67 a | 16.90±1.83 ab |
T4 | 1.77±0.06 a | 4.02±0.91 a | 15.81±1.77 ab |
T5 | 2.58±0.83 a | 4.66±0.33 a | 18.80±0.51 a |
T6 | 1.70±0.06 a | 3.91±0.59 a | 16.10±0.70 ab |
T7 | 2.73±0.99 a | 3.28±1.11 a | 15.67±0.71 ab |
T8 | 1.62±0.02 a | 2.74±1.43 a | 13.38±2.19 b |
T9 | 1.78±0.05 a | 2.42±0.71 a | 15.07±1.90 ab |
Table 9 Body index test of crucian carp under different treatments
处理Treatment | 肥满度 CF | 肝体指数 HSI | 脏体指数 VSI |
---|---|---|---|
T1 | 1.60±0.07 a | 2.37±0.64 a | 14.07±0.77 b |
T2 | 1.68±0.02 a | 2.26±1.12 a | 16.68±0.63 ab |
T3 | 1.73±0.03 a | 3.59±0.67 a | 16.90±1.83 ab |
T4 | 1.77±0.06 a | 4.02±0.91 a | 15.81±1.77 ab |
T5 | 2.58±0.83 a | 4.66±0.33 a | 18.80±0.51 a |
T6 | 1.70±0.06 a | 3.91±0.59 a | 16.10±0.70 ab |
T7 | 2.73±0.99 a | 3.28±1.11 a | 15.67±0.71 ab |
T8 | 1.62±0.02 a | 2.74±1.43 a | 13.38±2.19 b |
T9 | 1.78±0.05 a | 2.42±0.71 a | 15.07±1.90 ab |
指标 Indicator | 因素 Factor | 排序 Ranking | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
A | B | C | |||
水分Moisture/% | K1 | 72.844 | 73.350 | 70.735 | C>B>A |
K2 | 72.610 | 72.166 | 75.151 | ||
K3 | 71.808 | 71.747 | 71.377 | ||
极差R | 1.036 | 1.603 | 4.416 | ||
P值P value | 0.644 | 0.347 | 0.000 | ||
最佳水平Best level | A1 | B1 | C2 | ||
粗蛋白质Crude protein/% | K1 | 16.756 | 17.211 | 17.133 | A>B>C |
K2 | 17.256 | 17.178 | 17.200 | ||
K3 | 17.356 | 16.978 | 17.033 | ||
极差R | 0.600 | 0.233 | 0.167 | ||
P值P value | 0.086 | 0.707 | 0.859 | ||
最佳水平Best level | A3 | B1 | C2 | ||
粗脂肪 Crude fat/% | K1 | 1.556 | 1.667 | 1.700 | B>A>C |
K2 | 1.478 | 1.389 | 1.822 | ||
K3 | 1.911 | 1.889 | 1.422 | ||
极差R | 0.433 | 0.500 | 0.400 | ||
P值P value | 0.247 | 0.190 | 0.337 | ||
最佳水平Best level | A3 | B3 | C2 | ||
粗灰分 Crude ash/% | K1 | 1.056 | 1.064 | 1.098 | B>A>C |
K2 | 1.096 | 1.122 | 1.064 | ||
K3 | 1.111 | 1.076 | 1.100 | ||
极差R | 0.055 | 0.058 | 0.036 | ||
P值P value | 0.190 | 0.147 | 0.462 | ||
最佳水平Best level | A1 | B1 | C2 |
Table 10 Range analysis of muscle nutrients of crucian carp
指标 Indicator | 因素 Factor | 排序 Ranking | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
A | B | C | |||
水分Moisture/% | K1 | 72.844 | 73.350 | 70.735 | C>B>A |
K2 | 72.610 | 72.166 | 75.151 | ||
K3 | 71.808 | 71.747 | 71.377 | ||
极差R | 1.036 | 1.603 | 4.416 | ||
P值P value | 0.644 | 0.347 | 0.000 | ||
最佳水平Best level | A1 | B1 | C2 | ||
粗蛋白质Crude protein/% | K1 | 16.756 | 17.211 | 17.133 | A>B>C |
K2 | 17.256 | 17.178 | 17.200 | ||
K3 | 17.356 | 16.978 | 17.033 | ||
极差R | 0.600 | 0.233 | 0.167 | ||
P值P value | 0.086 | 0.707 | 0.859 | ||
最佳水平Best level | A3 | B1 | C2 | ||
粗脂肪 Crude fat/% | K1 | 1.556 | 1.667 | 1.700 | B>A>C |
K2 | 1.478 | 1.389 | 1.822 | ||
K3 | 1.911 | 1.889 | 1.422 | ||
极差R | 0.433 | 0.500 | 0.400 | ||
P值P value | 0.247 | 0.190 | 0.337 | ||
最佳水平Best level | A3 | B3 | C2 | ||
粗灰分 Crude ash/% | K1 | 1.056 | 1.064 | 1.098 | B>A>C |
K2 | 1.096 | 1.122 | 1.064 | ||
K3 | 1.111 | 1.076 | 1.100 | ||
极差R | 0.055 | 0.058 | 0.036 | ||
P值P value | 0.190 | 0.147 | 0.462 | ||
最佳水平Best level | A1 | B1 | C2 |
处理 Treatment | 水分 Moisture | 粗蛋白质 Crude protein | 粗脂肪 Crude fat | 粗灰分 Crude ash |
---|---|---|---|---|
T1 | 71.53±0.40 bc | 16.63±0.41 a | 1.90±0.38 ab | 1.07±0.03 ab |
T2 | 75.49±0.55 a | 16.93±0.13 a | 1.37±0.07 c | 1.07±0.03 ab |
T3 | 71.51±1.19 bc | 16.70±0.21 a | 1.40±0.10 c | 1.03±0.03 a |
T4 | 76.65±0.55 a | 17.60±0.32 a | 1.50±0.06 c | 1.03±0.04 a |
T5 | 70.75±1.06 c | 17.00±0.06 a | 1.27±0.07 c | 1.17±0.03 b |
T6 | 70.43±0.20 c | 17.17±0.33 a | 1.67±0.44 ab | 1.09±0.06 ab |
T7 | 71.87±0.25 bc | 17.40±0.55 a | 1.60±0.55 c | 1.10±0.00 ab |
T8 | 70.25±0.27 c | 17.60±0.61 a | 1.53±0.12 c | 1.13±0.03 ab |
T9 | 73.31±0.56 b | 17.07±0.24 a | 2.60±0.36 a | 1.10±0.00 ab |
Table 11 Muscle nutrient composition of crucian carp under different treatments
处理 Treatment | 水分 Moisture | 粗蛋白质 Crude protein | 粗脂肪 Crude fat | 粗灰分 Crude ash |
---|---|---|---|---|
T1 | 71.53±0.40 bc | 16.63±0.41 a | 1.90±0.38 ab | 1.07±0.03 ab |
T2 | 75.49±0.55 a | 16.93±0.13 a | 1.37±0.07 c | 1.07±0.03 ab |
T3 | 71.51±1.19 bc | 16.70±0.21 a | 1.40±0.10 c | 1.03±0.03 a |
T4 | 76.65±0.55 a | 17.60±0.32 a | 1.50±0.06 c | 1.03±0.04 a |
T5 | 70.75±1.06 c | 17.00±0.06 a | 1.27±0.07 c | 1.17±0.03 b |
T6 | 70.43±0.20 c | 17.17±0.33 a | 1.67±0.44 ab | 1.09±0.06 ab |
T7 | 71.87±0.25 bc | 17.40±0.55 a | 1.60±0.55 c | 1.10±0.00 ab |
T8 | 70.25±0.27 c | 17.60±0.61 a | 1.53±0.12 c | 1.13±0.03 ab |
T9 | 73.31±0.56 b | 17.07±0.24 a | 2.60±0.36 a | 1.10±0.00 ab |
1 | CHEN Z B, CUERVO D P, MÜLLER J A, et al.. Hydroponic root mats for wastewater treatment: A review [J]. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res., 2016, 23(16):15911-15928. |
2 | YEP B. ZHENG Y B. Aquaponic trends and challenges: A review [J]. J. Cleaner Prod., 2019, 228:1586-1599. |
3 | RAKOCY J E, HARGREAVES J A. Integration of vegetable hydroponics with fish culture: A review [M]. Tech. Mod. Aquacult., 1993(1):148-158. |
4 | TYSON R V, SIMONNE E H, WHITE J M, et al.. Reconciling water quality parameters impacting nitrification in aquaponics: the pH levels [J]. Proc. Fla. State Hort. Soc., 2004, 117:79-83. |
5 | TYSON R V, TREADWELL D D, SIMONNE E H. Opportunities and challenges to sustainability in aquaponic systems [J]. Hort. Technol., 2011, 21:6-13. |
6 | 陆宇辰,赵牧秋.不同鱼-菜比值共生系统的水体无机态氮磷含量变化[J].土壤与作物,2018,7(1):31-37. |
LU Y C, ZHAO M Q. Effects of fish-vegetable ratio on water inorganic nitrogen and phosphorus contents in aquaponics system [J]. Soil Crop, 2018, 7(1):31-37. | |
7 | ENDUT A, JUSOH A, ALI N, et al.. Effect of flow rate on water quality parameters and plant growth of water spinach (Ipomoea aquatica) in a naquaponic recirculating system [J]. Desalin Water Treat, 2009, 5(1-3):19-28. |
8 | LENNARD W A. A nutrient dynamic process and the relationship to fish feeds [J]. World Aquacult., 2015, 9:20-23. |
9 | 刘爽,安诗琦,严子微,等.现代鱼菜共生技术研究进展与展望[J].中国农业科技导报,2020,22(3):160-166. |
LIU S, AN S Q, YAN Z W, et al.. Progress and prospect of aquaponics technology [J]. J. Agric. Sci. Technol., 2020, 22(3):160-166. | |
10 | 中华人民共和国国家卫生和计划生育委员会. 食品安全国家标准:食品中水分的测定 [S].北京:中国标准出版社,2017. |
11 | 中华人民共和国国家卫生和计划生育委员会. 食品安全国家标准:食品中灰分的测定 [S].北京:中国标准出版社,2017. |
12 | 中华人民共和国国家卫生和计划生育委员会. 食品安全国家标准:食品中粗蛋白的测定 [S].北京:中国标准出版社,2017. |
13 | 中华人民共和国国家卫生和计划生育委员会. 食品安全国家标准:食品中粗脂肪的测定 [S].北京:中国标准出版社,2017. |
14 | RAKOCY J E, MASSER M P, LOSORDO T M. Recirculating aquaculture tank production systems: Aquaponics-integrating fish and plant culture [R]. Stoneville Mississippi: Southern Regional Aquaculture Center, 2006(4):54 |
15 | BUZBY K M, LIN L. Scaling aquaponic systems: Balancing plant uptake with fish output [J]. Aquacult. Eng., 2014, 63:39-44. |
16 | 蔡淑芳,陈永快,陈敏,等.鱼菜共生系统中植物密度对水质及鱼菜生长的影响[J].渔业现代化,2018,45(5):19-25. |
CAI S F, CHEN Y K, CHEN M, et al.. Effects of plant density on water quality and growth of fish and vegetables in aquaponics system [J]. Fishery Mod., 2018, 45(5):19-25 | |
17 | 卫育良,王建学,徐后国,等.红鳍东方鲀幼鱼适宜投喂频率和投喂水平的研究[J].动物营养学报,2021,33(3):1755-1765 |
WEI Y L, WANG J X, XU H G. et al.. Study on optimum feeding frequency and feeding level of juvenile Takifugu rubripes [J]. Chin. J. Animal Nutr., 2021, 33(3):1755-1765 | |
18 | 袁新程,谢永德,刘永士,等.两种养殖密度对刀鲚当年鱼种生长性能、消化及非特异性免疫能力的影响[J].上海海洋大学学报,2021,30(2):222-230. |
YUAN X C, XIE Y D, LIU Y S, et al.. Effects of two stocking densities on growth performance, digestion and non-specific immunity of the current year Coilia nasus [J]. J. Shanghai Ocean Univ., 2021, 30(2):222-230. | |
19 | 倪金金,王裕玉,徐钢春,等.养殖密度对池塘循环水养殖大口黑鲈生长、生理指标和GH、IGF-I基因表达的影响[J].大连海洋大学学报,2020,35(6):805-813. |
NI J J, WANG Y Y, XU G C, et al.. Effects of stocking density on growth, physiological indices and expression of GH and IGF-I genes of largemouth bass Micropterus salmoides in in-pond raceway culture systems [J]. J. Dalian Ocean Univ., 2020, 35(6):805-813. | |
20 | 潘伟平,王伊凡,应李民,等.投饲频率对青鱼生长、生理生化指标及摄食相关基因表达水平的影响[J].中国粮油学报,2020,35(4):83-91. |
PAN W P, WANG Y F, YING L M, et al.. Effects of feeding frequency on growth, physiological and biochemicalindexes and expression levels of ingestion-related genes of black carp [J]. J. Chin. Cereals Oils Assoc., 2020, 35(4):83-91. | |
21 | 刘永士,王建军,朱建明,等.养殖密度对二龄刀鲚生长的影响[J].大连海洋大学学报,2020,(37):1-11. |
LIU Y S, WANG J J, ZHU J M, et al.. Effects of stocking density on growth of two-year old tapertail anchovy Coilia nasus [J]. J. Dalian Ocean Univ., 2020(37):1-11. | |
22 | 杨育凯,黄小林,林黑着,等.黄斑篮子鱼幼鱼适宜投喂频率的研究[J].动物营养学报,2020,32(4):1809-1816. |
YANG Y K, HUANG X L, LIN H Z, et al.. Optimal feeding frequency for juvenile Siganus oramin [J]. Chin. J. Animal Nutr., 2020, 32(4):1809-1816. | |
23 | 张奇.圈养模式下养殖密度对大口黑鲈生长、生理指标以及肌肉品质影响的研究[D].武汉:华中农业大学, 2020. |
ZHANG Q. Study on the effects of stocking density on growth, physiological indexes and muscle quality of Micropterus salmoides [D]. Wuhan: Huazhong Agricultural University, 2020. | |
24 | 马建忠,曾国权,聂鹏程,等.投喂频率对绿鳍马面鲀幼鱼生长和肌肉品质的影响[J].水产科技情报,2021,48(1):28-32. |
MA J Z, ZENG G G, NIE P C, et al.. Effects of feeding frequency on growth performance and muscle quality of juvenile Thamnaconus modestus [J]. Fisheries Sci. Technol. Inf., 2021, 48(1):28-32. | |
25 | 檀晨曦.循环水养殖模式下养殖密度和投喂频率对花鳗鲡生长性能、体组成、消化酶活性和血清生化指标的影响[D].上海:上海海洋大学, 2016. |
TAN C X. Effects of culture density and feeding frequency on growth performance, body composition, digestive enzyme activities and serum biochemical indices of Anguilla anguilla under circulating aquaculture [D]. Shanghai: Shanghai Ocean University, 2016. | |
26 | 左腾,黄凯,汪婷,等.养殖密度对吉富罗非鱼幼鱼生长、免疫功能的影响[J].水产科学,2019,38(5):581-588. |
ZUO T, HUANG K, WANG T, et al.. Effects of stocking density on growth and immune function of juvenile GIFT tilapia Oreochromis niloticus [J]. Fisheries Sci., 2019, 38(5):581-588. | |
27 | 唐国盘,黄安群,秦改晓,等.高温下饲料投喂频率对黄河鲤鱼幼鱼的生长、体成分、血清生化指标及抗病力的影响[J].黑龙江畜牧兽医,2017(9):234-238. |
28 | TRANG N T D, DENNIS K, HANS B. Effects of recirculation rates on water quality and Oreochromis niloticus growth in aquaponic systems [J]. Aquacult. Eng., 2017, 78:95-104. |
29 | 蔡淑芳,陈敏,陈永快,等.种植密度对鱼菜共生系统氮素转化的影响[J].农业工程学报,2019,35(4):132-137. |
CAI S F, CHEN M, CHEN Y K, et al.. Effects of plant density on nitrogen transformation in aquaponics system [J]. Trans. Chin. Soc. Agric. Eng., 2019, 35(4):132-137. |
[1] | HUANG Yulan§, LONG Shengfeng§, YE Xingzhi, LI Yanying, SHEN Zhangyou, ZHOU Jia, ZHOU Lingzhi, LAO Chengying, WEI Benhui. Study on the Agronomic Characters, Yield and Quality of Cassava in Enshi of Hubei Province [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2021, 23(9): 46-55. |
[2] | WAN Yu, YANG Haiming, HAN Houming, ZHANG Hang, YANG Yu, LIANG Jingru, WANG Zhiyue, . Early Growth and Development Characteristics of Digestive Organs and Their Correlation with Body Weight in Jiangnan White Geese [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2021, 23(9): 69-77. |
[3] | XI Min, XU Youzun, SUN Xueyuan, WU Wenge, ZHOU Yongjin. Effects of Nitrogen Fertilizer Topdressing on Grain Filling and Milling Quality of the Rice with High Grain Chalkiness [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2021, 23(9): 144-151. |
[4] | LIU Yuqian, LU Faguang, GU Lifeng, REN Zhen, SHI Yu, LU Haitong, XU Zhenran, ZHOU Guisheng, WANG Xiaoshan, ZHANG Wangding, REN Zhiqiang, ZHU Guanglong, . Study on High Yield Production Technology of Oat in Saline Soils of Coastal beach and Its Associated Physiological Basis [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2021, 23(9): 160-172. |
[5] | LIU Yuanbo, WANG Jing, Zhu Xuejie, JIANG Weifeng, LIU Tian, ZHANG Jinzhong, LI Yaoxin, FU Yunpeng. Effects of Different Water and Fertilizer Management Modes on Nutrient Accumulation and Quality of Flue-cured Tobacco Leaves [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2021, 23(9): 193-201. |
[6] | YIN Yan, YIN Liang, ZHANG Xuekun, GUO Jingli, WANG Jijun. Status and Countermeasure of The High-quality Development of Rapeseed Industry in China [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2021, 23(8): 1-7. |
[7] | LI Shengmei, YANG Tao, HUANG Yajie, REN Dan, GENG Shiwei, LI Dianpeng, RUI Cun, GAO Wenwei. Discussion on the Relationship Between Main Agronomic Traits and Fiber Quality in Backcross Populations of Gossypium hirsutum L. × Gossypium barbadense L. [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2021, 23(8): 16-24. |
[8] | WU Zishuai, LI Hu, HUANG Qiuyao, CHEN Chuanhua, LUO Qunchang, ZHOU Xinmin, WU Jiaju, LIU Guanglin. Influences of Nitrogen Fertilizer Application Rate and Planting Density on the Yield and Rice Quality of Guiyu 11 [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2021, 23(8): 154-162. |
[9] | ZHU Lixia, CHEN Jutian, XU Siwei, CHEN Rubing, LI Lili. Dynamics of Soil Microbial Biomass Carbon and Nitrogen After Biochar Application [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2021, 23(8): 193-200. |
[10] | JIANG Yun, ZHANG Lili, XUE Ping, WANG Xiudong. Development Status of Wheat Industry in China and International Experience for Reference [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2021, 23(7): 1-10. |
[11] | CHEN Yuan, LIU Zhenyu, ZHOU Mingyuan, ZHANG Chenxia, TIAN Qiaofeng, ZHANG Zhongning, ZHANG Xiang, CHEN Dehua. Effect of Planting Density on the Expression of Insecticidal Protein and Nitrogen Metabolism in the Fiber of Bt Transgenic Cotton [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2021, 23(7): 45-53. |
[12] | LUO Youyi, WANG Weiqin, ZHENG Huabin, LIU Gongyi, CHAO Ying, XU Cai, ZHENG Zhigang, LI Xueqian, WEI Yinlan, TANG Qiyuan. Influences of Different Mechanical and Orderly Planting Methods on Growth Characteristics and Yield of rice [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2021, 23(7): 162-171. |
[13] | HU Yang, LI Gangtie, LI Xing, JIA Shouyi. Growth and Physiological Index of Tamarix leptostachys Bunge Seedlings Under Soil Drought Stress [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2021, 23(6): 43-50. |
[14] | . [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2021, 23(6): 105-112. |
[15] | JIANG Shukun, WANG Lizhi, YANG Xianli, CHI liyong, LI Zhongjie, LI Mingxian, ZHANG Xijuan, ZHAO Qian, LI Rui, JIANG Hui, LI Wenhua . Effect of Increasing Temperature in Different Growth Stages on Rice Yield and Quality in Cold Regions [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2021, 23(6): 130-139. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||