Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology ›› 2022, Vol. 24 ›› Issue (5): 32-45.DOI: 10.13304/j.nykjdb.2020.1074
• BIOTECHNOLOGY & LIFE SCIENCE • Previous Articles Next Articles
Hongliang CUI1(), Xiaoxiao SONG2, Qing YAO1, Wangang AN1, Bao XING3, Peiyou QIN3(
)
Received:
2020-12-17
Accepted:
2021-03-15
Online:
2022-05-15
Published:
2022-06-06
Contact:
Hongliang CUI,Peiyou QIN
崔宏亮1(), 宋晓晓2, 姚庆1, 安万刚1, 邢宝3, 秦培友3(
)
通讯作者:
崔宏亮,秦培友
作者简介:
崔宏亮 Email: chl8129@126.com基金资助:
CLC Number:
Hongliang CUI, Xiaoxiao SONG, Qing YAO, Wangang AN, Bao XING, Peiyou QIN. Physiological Responses of Different Quinoa Varieties to Salt Stress and Evaluation of Salt Tolerance in Yili Valley[J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2022, 24(5): 32-45.
崔宏亮, 宋晓晓, 姚庆, 安万刚, 邢宝, 秦培友. 伊犁河谷不同藜麦品种对盐胁迫的生理响应及耐盐评价[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2022, 24(5): 32-45.
指标 Index | 品种 Variety | NaCl浓度 NaCl concentration/(mmol·L-1) | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0(CK) | 50 | 100 | 150 | 200 | 250 | 300 | 350 | 400 | ||
发芽率 Germination percentage/% | NXSG56 | 100.00 a | 99.33 a | 100.00 a | 97.33 a | 93.33 a | 87.33 ab | 78.00 a | 74.00 a | 57.33 b |
NXSG85 | 98.67 a | 99.33 a | 100.00 a | 98.00 a | 94.67 a | 92.67 a | 81.33 a | 78.67 a | 67.33 a | |
HP9 | 95.33 ab | 96.67 ab | 99.33 ab | 90.67 b | 85.33 b | 82.67 bc | 67.33 b | 42.00 b | 30.67 c | |
GY3 | 84.67 c | 90.67 c | 94.00 c | 89.33 b | 81.33 b | 70.67 d | 29.33 c | 21.33 c | 18.67 d | |
QA13-9 | 93.33 b | 94.00 bc | 94.67 bc | 86.67 b | 85.33 b | 77.33 c | 18.67 d | 14.67 c | 11.33 d | |
发芽势 Germination energy/% | NXSG56 | 97.67 a | 98.00 a | 99.33 a | 94.33 a | 84.33 b | 50.67 c | 31.00 b | 17.00 b | 6.67 b |
NXSG85 | 98.00 a | 98.00 a | 99.00 a | 94.33 a | 89.67 a | 88.33 a | 55.33 a | 47.00 a | 20.00 a | |
HP9 | 85.33 b | 79.33 c | 94.00 b | 79.33 b | 50.00 d | 40.67 d | 2.00 e | 0.00 d | 0.00 d | |
GY3 | 81.33 c | 82.33 c | 83.00 c | 75.67 bc | 70.67 c | 68.00 b | 11.00 c | 8.33 c | 0.00 d | |
QA13-9 | 94.67 a | 89.33 b | 93.33 b | 75.00 c | 46.33 e | 50.33 c | 4.67 d | 0.00 d | 3.67 c | |
相对盐害率 Relative salt injury indexes/% | NXSG56 | 0.00 a | 0.67 a | 0.00 a | 2.67 ab | 6.67 a | 12.67 ab | 22.00 cd | 26.00 d | 42.67 d |
NXSG85 | 0.00 a | -0.69 a | -1.36 a | 0.68 ab | 4.07 a | 6.10 b | 17.55 d | 20.24 d | 31.71 e | |
HP9 | 0.00 a | -1.48 a | -4.26 ab | 4.88 a | 10.41 a | 13.30 ab | 29.30 c | 55.96 c | 67.78 c | |
GY3 | 0.00 a | -7.22 a | -11.05 b | -5.64 b | 3.82 a | 16.33 ab | 65.22 b | 74.75 b | 77.98 b | |
QA13-9 | 0.00 a | -0.88 a | -1.64 a | 6.94 a | 8.46 a | 16.92 a | 79.86 a | 84.22 a | 87.88 a | |
相对发芽率 Relative germination ercentage/% | NXSG56 | 100.00 a | 99.33 a | 100.00 b | 97.33 ab | 93.33 a | 87.33 ab | 78.00 ab | 74.00 a | 57.33 b |
NXSG85 | 100.00 a | 100.69 a | 101.36 b | 99.32 ab | 95.93 a | 93.90 a | 82.45 a | 79.76 a | 68.29 a | |
HP9 | 100.00 a | 101.48 a | 104.26 ab | 95.12 b | 89.59 a | 86.70 ab | 70.70 b | 44.04 b | 32.22 c | |
GY3 | 100.00 a | 107.22 a | 111.05 a | 105.64 a | 96.18 a | 83.67 ab | 34.78 c | 25.25 c | 22.02 d | |
QA13-9 | 100.00 a | 100.88 a | 101.64 b | 93.06 b | 91.54 a | 83.08 b | 20.14 d | 15.78 d | 12.12 e | |
胚根长 Radicle length/mm | NXSG56 | 41.20 a | 40.08 a | 35.19 b | 33.23 b | 31.17 b | 25.09 b | 12.40 b | 8.23 a | 5.01 b |
NXSG85 | 43.19 a | 40.31 a | 38.04 a | 37.07 a | 34.08 a | 29.54 a | 14.42 a | 9.13 a | 7.10 a | |
HP9 | 38.09 b | 35.02 b | 30.17 c | 24.96 c | 19.94 c | 14.05 c | 11.98 b | 9.14 a | 6.20 a | |
GY3 | 34.10 c | 31.14 c | 25.03 d | 21.04 d | 17.18 d | 12.08 c | 9.07 c | 5.08 b | 4.97 b | |
QA13-9 | 33.45 c | 29.65 c | 26.93 d | 19.46 d | 14.64 e | 12.18 c | 8.04 c | 6.06 b | 4.10 b | |
根长抑制率 Inhibition rate of root length/% | NXSG56 | 0.00 a | 2.53 a | 14.51 bc | 19.13 b | 24.17 b | 39.14 b | 69.93 bc | 80.03 bc | 87.84 a |
NXSG85 | 0.00 a | 6.68 a | 11.88 c | 14.11 b | 20.99 b | 31.62 c | 66.56 c | 78.83 c | 83.57 b | |
HP9 | 0.00 a | 8.09 a | 20.77 ab | 34.40 a | 47.58 a | 63.09 a | 68.50 bc | 76.02 d | 83.72 b | |
GY3 | 0.00 a | 8.61 a | 26.68 a | 38.30 a | 49.55 a | 64.61 a | 73.38 ab | 85.10 a | 85.44 b | |
QA13-9 | 0.00 a | 11.25 a | 19.34 abc | 41.79 a | 56.21 a | 63.57 a | 76.02 a | 81.88 b | 87.73 a |
Table 1 Effect of different concentration of NaCl on seed germination of quinoa
指标 Index | 品种 Variety | NaCl浓度 NaCl concentration/(mmol·L-1) | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0(CK) | 50 | 100 | 150 | 200 | 250 | 300 | 350 | 400 | ||
发芽率 Germination percentage/% | NXSG56 | 100.00 a | 99.33 a | 100.00 a | 97.33 a | 93.33 a | 87.33 ab | 78.00 a | 74.00 a | 57.33 b |
NXSG85 | 98.67 a | 99.33 a | 100.00 a | 98.00 a | 94.67 a | 92.67 a | 81.33 a | 78.67 a | 67.33 a | |
HP9 | 95.33 ab | 96.67 ab | 99.33 ab | 90.67 b | 85.33 b | 82.67 bc | 67.33 b | 42.00 b | 30.67 c | |
GY3 | 84.67 c | 90.67 c | 94.00 c | 89.33 b | 81.33 b | 70.67 d | 29.33 c | 21.33 c | 18.67 d | |
QA13-9 | 93.33 b | 94.00 bc | 94.67 bc | 86.67 b | 85.33 b | 77.33 c | 18.67 d | 14.67 c | 11.33 d | |
发芽势 Germination energy/% | NXSG56 | 97.67 a | 98.00 a | 99.33 a | 94.33 a | 84.33 b | 50.67 c | 31.00 b | 17.00 b | 6.67 b |
NXSG85 | 98.00 a | 98.00 a | 99.00 a | 94.33 a | 89.67 a | 88.33 a | 55.33 a | 47.00 a | 20.00 a | |
HP9 | 85.33 b | 79.33 c | 94.00 b | 79.33 b | 50.00 d | 40.67 d | 2.00 e | 0.00 d | 0.00 d | |
GY3 | 81.33 c | 82.33 c | 83.00 c | 75.67 bc | 70.67 c | 68.00 b | 11.00 c | 8.33 c | 0.00 d | |
QA13-9 | 94.67 a | 89.33 b | 93.33 b | 75.00 c | 46.33 e | 50.33 c | 4.67 d | 0.00 d | 3.67 c | |
相对盐害率 Relative salt injury indexes/% | NXSG56 | 0.00 a | 0.67 a | 0.00 a | 2.67 ab | 6.67 a | 12.67 ab | 22.00 cd | 26.00 d | 42.67 d |
NXSG85 | 0.00 a | -0.69 a | -1.36 a | 0.68 ab | 4.07 a | 6.10 b | 17.55 d | 20.24 d | 31.71 e | |
HP9 | 0.00 a | -1.48 a | -4.26 ab | 4.88 a | 10.41 a | 13.30 ab | 29.30 c | 55.96 c | 67.78 c | |
GY3 | 0.00 a | -7.22 a | -11.05 b | -5.64 b | 3.82 a | 16.33 ab | 65.22 b | 74.75 b | 77.98 b | |
QA13-9 | 0.00 a | -0.88 a | -1.64 a | 6.94 a | 8.46 a | 16.92 a | 79.86 a | 84.22 a | 87.88 a | |
相对发芽率 Relative germination ercentage/% | NXSG56 | 100.00 a | 99.33 a | 100.00 b | 97.33 ab | 93.33 a | 87.33 ab | 78.00 ab | 74.00 a | 57.33 b |
NXSG85 | 100.00 a | 100.69 a | 101.36 b | 99.32 ab | 95.93 a | 93.90 a | 82.45 a | 79.76 a | 68.29 a | |
HP9 | 100.00 a | 101.48 a | 104.26 ab | 95.12 b | 89.59 a | 86.70 ab | 70.70 b | 44.04 b | 32.22 c | |
GY3 | 100.00 a | 107.22 a | 111.05 a | 105.64 a | 96.18 a | 83.67 ab | 34.78 c | 25.25 c | 22.02 d | |
QA13-9 | 100.00 a | 100.88 a | 101.64 b | 93.06 b | 91.54 a | 83.08 b | 20.14 d | 15.78 d | 12.12 e | |
胚根长 Radicle length/mm | NXSG56 | 41.20 a | 40.08 a | 35.19 b | 33.23 b | 31.17 b | 25.09 b | 12.40 b | 8.23 a | 5.01 b |
NXSG85 | 43.19 a | 40.31 a | 38.04 a | 37.07 a | 34.08 a | 29.54 a | 14.42 a | 9.13 a | 7.10 a | |
HP9 | 38.09 b | 35.02 b | 30.17 c | 24.96 c | 19.94 c | 14.05 c | 11.98 b | 9.14 a | 6.20 a | |
GY3 | 34.10 c | 31.14 c | 25.03 d | 21.04 d | 17.18 d | 12.08 c | 9.07 c | 5.08 b | 4.97 b | |
QA13-9 | 33.45 c | 29.65 c | 26.93 d | 19.46 d | 14.64 e | 12.18 c | 8.04 c | 6.06 b | 4.10 b | |
根长抑制率 Inhibition rate of root length/% | NXSG56 | 0.00 a | 2.53 a | 14.51 bc | 19.13 b | 24.17 b | 39.14 b | 69.93 bc | 80.03 bc | 87.84 a |
NXSG85 | 0.00 a | 6.68 a | 11.88 c | 14.11 b | 20.99 b | 31.62 c | 66.56 c | 78.83 c | 83.57 b | |
HP9 | 0.00 a | 8.09 a | 20.77 ab | 34.40 a | 47.58 a | 63.09 a | 68.50 bc | 76.02 d | 83.72 b | |
GY3 | 0.00 a | 8.61 a | 26.68 a | 38.30 a | 49.55 a | 64.61 a | 73.38 ab | 85.10 a | 85.44 b | |
QA13-9 | 0.00 a | 11.25 a | 19.34 abc | 41.79 a | 56.21 a | 63.57 a | 76.02 a | 81.88 b | 87.73 a |
指标 Index | 取样 时间 Sampling time/d | 品种 Variety | NaCl浓度 NaCl concentration/(mmol·L-1) | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0(CK) | 50 | 100 | 150 | 200 | 250 | 300 | 350 | 400 | |||
地下部分鲜重 Fresh weight of under-ground part/g | 10 | NXSG56 | 0.057 9 c | 0.062 3 c | 0.070 3 b | 0.079 2 b | 0.087 5 b | 0.061 4 b | 0.050 1 b | 0.041 1 b | 0.035 0 b |
NXSG85 | 0.066 9 a | 0.080 3 a | 0.087 0 a | 0.096 3 a | 0.099 5 a | 0.072 8 a | 0.061 1 a | 0.049 2 a | 0.041 3 a | ||
HP9 | 0.061 1 b | 0.068 3 b | 0.069 1 c | 0.070 7 c | 0.074 1 c | 0.0607 b | 0.048 5 c | 0.040 2 c | 0.033 6 c | ||
GY3 | 0.057 6 c | 0.046 1 d | 0.058 7 d | 0.062 5 d | 0.068 8 d | 0.057 3 c | 0.040 5 d | 0.037 2 d | 0.030 8 d | ||
QA13-9 | 0.048 6 d | 0.040 0 e | 0.044 6 e | 0.052 6 e | 0.055 8 e | 0.050 3 d | 0.037 5 e | 0.030 2 e | 0.028 8 e | ||
15 | NXSG56 | 0.096 9 a | 0.095 4 b | 0.113 9 b | 0.145 9 b | 0.153 6 b | 0.123 9 b | 0.098 1 b | 0.081 8 b | 0.067 7 b | |
NXSG85 | 0.098 4 a | 0.099 3 a | 0.125 8 a | 0.150 2 a | 0.159 7 a | 0.135 1 a | 0.110 2 a | 0.089 3 a | 0.075 7 a | ||
HP9 | 0.086 0 b | 0.090 7 c | 0.105 4 c | 0.135 3 c | 0.139 8 c | 0.115 2 c | 0.100 3 b | 0.075 3 c | 0.055 8 d | ||
GY3 | 0.082 4 c | 0.089 7 c | 0.106 4 c | 0.121 2 d | 0.129 9 d | 0.108 5 d | 0.101 3 b | 0.065 3 d | 0.060 8 c | ||
QA13-9 | 0.080 2 c | 0.091 2 c | 0.098 2 d | 0.117 4 e | 0.129 9 d | 0.108 3 d | 0.101 3 b | 0.059 8 e | 0.054 8 d | ||
地下部分干重 Dry weight of under-ground part/g | 5 | NXSG56 | 0.003 2 bc | 0.004 1 b | 0.004 9 a | 0.006 1 b | 0.007 8 b | 0.008 6 b | 0.006 8 a | 0.005 1 b | 0.004 2 b |
NXSG85 | 0.004 3 a | 0.006 1 a | 0.005 7 a | 0.008 4 a | 0.008 9 a | 0.009 7 a | 0.007 1 a | 0.006 6 a | 0.005 1 a | ||
HP9 | 0.003 5 b | 0.004 1 b | 0.005 2 a | 0.005 9 b | 0.008 1 ab | 0.008 4 b | 0.006 4 a | 0.005 3 b | 0.004 9 ab | ||
GY3 | 0.002 5 cd | 0.003 7 b | 0.004 0 b | 0.005 5 b | 0.006 3 c | 0.007 8 b | 0.005 4 b | 0.004 8 b | 0.003 4 c | ||
QA13-9 | 0.001 8 d | 0.002 6 c | 0.003 4 b | 0.004 1 c | 0.005 7 c | 0.006 2 c | 0.004 8 b | 0.003 6 c | 0.002 1 d | ||
10 | NXSG56 | 0.007 2 b | 0.007 8 b | 0.009 3 ab | 0.010 8 b | 0.012 7 b | 0.011 3 b | 0.009 5 ab | 0.007 6 b | 0.007 1 b | |
NXSG85 | 0.008 6 a | 0.009 3 a | 0.010 1 a | 0.014 5 a | 0.013 7 a | 0.012 4 a | 0.010 3 a | 0.009 3 a | 0.008 1 a | ||
HP9 | 0.006 9 b | 0.0070 bc | 0.008 5 bc | 0.009 4 c | 0.010 9 c | 0.009 1 b | 0.008 0 c | 0.006 7 c | 0.005 8 c | ||
GY3 | 0.006 5 bc | 0.006 1 d | 0.007 8 cd | 0.009 5 c | 0.011 6 c | 0.011 1 b | 0.009 7 a | 0.008 5 a | 0.007 3 ab | ||
QA13-9 | 0.005 8 c | 0.006 8 cd | 0.007 1 d | 0.008 4 d | 0.009 8 d | 0.010 7 c | 0.008 6 ab | 0.007 2 bc | 0.005 8 c | ||
15 | NXSG56 | 0.014 8 b | 0.016 5 b | 0.016 8 b | 0.018 5 b | 0.020 5 b | 0.017 9 b | 0.015 9 b | 0.012 0 b | 0.010 2 b | |
NXSG85 | 0.018 8 a | 0.019 5 a | 0.019 7 a | 0.021 8 a | 0.027 5 a | 0.018 8 a | 0.017 9 a | 0.014 2 a | 0.012 2 a | ||
HP9 | 0.013 7 c | 0.014 5 c | 0.014 8 c | 0.017 5 c | 0.019 4 c | 0.017 1 c | 0.014 4 c | 0.011 8 c | 0.009 2 c | ||
GY3 | 0.009 7 d | 0.012 5 d | 0.014 8 c | 0.016 5 d | 0.017 0 d | 0.014 1 d | 0.010 4 d | 0.007 8 d | 0.005 5 d | ||
QA13-9 | 0.006 7 e | 0.008 5 e | 0.009 4 d | 0.010 5 e | 0.012 7 e | 0.008 7 e | 0.054 0 e | 0.004 8 e | 0.003 2 e |
Table 2 Effect of NaCl on biomasses of quinoa seedlings
指标 Index | 取样 时间 Sampling time/d | 品种 Variety | NaCl浓度 NaCl concentration/(mmol·L-1) | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0(CK) | 50 | 100 | 150 | 200 | 250 | 300 | 350 | 400 | |||
地下部分鲜重 Fresh weight of under-ground part/g | 10 | NXSG56 | 0.057 9 c | 0.062 3 c | 0.070 3 b | 0.079 2 b | 0.087 5 b | 0.061 4 b | 0.050 1 b | 0.041 1 b | 0.035 0 b |
NXSG85 | 0.066 9 a | 0.080 3 a | 0.087 0 a | 0.096 3 a | 0.099 5 a | 0.072 8 a | 0.061 1 a | 0.049 2 a | 0.041 3 a | ||
HP9 | 0.061 1 b | 0.068 3 b | 0.069 1 c | 0.070 7 c | 0.074 1 c | 0.0607 b | 0.048 5 c | 0.040 2 c | 0.033 6 c | ||
GY3 | 0.057 6 c | 0.046 1 d | 0.058 7 d | 0.062 5 d | 0.068 8 d | 0.057 3 c | 0.040 5 d | 0.037 2 d | 0.030 8 d | ||
QA13-9 | 0.048 6 d | 0.040 0 e | 0.044 6 e | 0.052 6 e | 0.055 8 e | 0.050 3 d | 0.037 5 e | 0.030 2 e | 0.028 8 e | ||
15 | NXSG56 | 0.096 9 a | 0.095 4 b | 0.113 9 b | 0.145 9 b | 0.153 6 b | 0.123 9 b | 0.098 1 b | 0.081 8 b | 0.067 7 b | |
NXSG85 | 0.098 4 a | 0.099 3 a | 0.125 8 a | 0.150 2 a | 0.159 7 a | 0.135 1 a | 0.110 2 a | 0.089 3 a | 0.075 7 a | ||
HP9 | 0.086 0 b | 0.090 7 c | 0.105 4 c | 0.135 3 c | 0.139 8 c | 0.115 2 c | 0.100 3 b | 0.075 3 c | 0.055 8 d | ||
GY3 | 0.082 4 c | 0.089 7 c | 0.106 4 c | 0.121 2 d | 0.129 9 d | 0.108 5 d | 0.101 3 b | 0.065 3 d | 0.060 8 c | ||
QA13-9 | 0.080 2 c | 0.091 2 c | 0.098 2 d | 0.117 4 e | 0.129 9 d | 0.108 3 d | 0.101 3 b | 0.059 8 e | 0.054 8 d | ||
地下部分干重 Dry weight of under-ground part/g | 5 | NXSG56 | 0.003 2 bc | 0.004 1 b | 0.004 9 a | 0.006 1 b | 0.007 8 b | 0.008 6 b | 0.006 8 a | 0.005 1 b | 0.004 2 b |
NXSG85 | 0.004 3 a | 0.006 1 a | 0.005 7 a | 0.008 4 a | 0.008 9 a | 0.009 7 a | 0.007 1 a | 0.006 6 a | 0.005 1 a | ||
HP9 | 0.003 5 b | 0.004 1 b | 0.005 2 a | 0.005 9 b | 0.008 1 ab | 0.008 4 b | 0.006 4 a | 0.005 3 b | 0.004 9 ab | ||
GY3 | 0.002 5 cd | 0.003 7 b | 0.004 0 b | 0.005 5 b | 0.006 3 c | 0.007 8 b | 0.005 4 b | 0.004 8 b | 0.003 4 c | ||
QA13-9 | 0.001 8 d | 0.002 6 c | 0.003 4 b | 0.004 1 c | 0.005 7 c | 0.006 2 c | 0.004 8 b | 0.003 6 c | 0.002 1 d | ||
10 | NXSG56 | 0.007 2 b | 0.007 8 b | 0.009 3 ab | 0.010 8 b | 0.012 7 b | 0.011 3 b | 0.009 5 ab | 0.007 6 b | 0.007 1 b | |
NXSG85 | 0.008 6 a | 0.009 3 a | 0.010 1 a | 0.014 5 a | 0.013 7 a | 0.012 4 a | 0.010 3 a | 0.009 3 a | 0.008 1 a | ||
HP9 | 0.006 9 b | 0.0070 bc | 0.008 5 bc | 0.009 4 c | 0.010 9 c | 0.009 1 b | 0.008 0 c | 0.006 7 c | 0.005 8 c | ||
GY3 | 0.006 5 bc | 0.006 1 d | 0.007 8 cd | 0.009 5 c | 0.011 6 c | 0.011 1 b | 0.009 7 a | 0.008 5 a | 0.007 3 ab | ||
QA13-9 | 0.005 8 c | 0.006 8 cd | 0.007 1 d | 0.008 4 d | 0.009 8 d | 0.010 7 c | 0.008 6 ab | 0.007 2 bc | 0.005 8 c | ||
15 | NXSG56 | 0.014 8 b | 0.016 5 b | 0.016 8 b | 0.018 5 b | 0.020 5 b | 0.017 9 b | 0.015 9 b | 0.012 0 b | 0.010 2 b | |
NXSG85 | 0.018 8 a | 0.019 5 a | 0.019 7 a | 0.021 8 a | 0.027 5 a | 0.018 8 a | 0.017 9 a | 0.014 2 a | 0.012 2 a | ||
HP9 | 0.013 7 c | 0.014 5 c | 0.014 8 c | 0.017 5 c | 0.019 4 c | 0.017 1 c | 0.014 4 c | 0.011 8 c | 0.009 2 c | ||
GY3 | 0.009 7 d | 0.012 5 d | 0.014 8 c | 0.016 5 d | 0.017 0 d | 0.014 1 d | 0.010 4 d | 0.007 8 d | 0.005 5 d | ||
QA13-9 | 0.006 7 e | 0.008 5 e | 0.009 4 d | 0.010 5 e | 0.012 7 e | 0.008 7 e | 0.054 0 e | 0.004 8 e | 0.003 2 e |
Fig. 1 Effects of NaCl on relative conductance of quinoa seedlingsNote: Different small letters of the same NaCl concentration indicate significant difference at P<0.05 level.
Fig. 2 Effects of NaCl stress on chlorophyll contents of quinoa seedlingsNote: Different small letters of the same NaCl concentration indicate significant difference at P<0.05 level.
Fig. 3 Effects of NaCl stress on cellulose contents of quinoa seedlingsNote: Different small letters of the same NaCl concentration indicate significant difference at P<0.05 level.
Fig. 4 Effects of NaCl stress on soluble sugar contents of quinoa seedlingsNote: Different small letters of the same NaCl concentration indicate significant difference at P<0.05 level.
Fig. 5 Effects of NaCl stress on proline contents of quinoa seedlingsNote: Different small letters of the same NaCl concentration indicate significant difference at P<0.05 level.
指标 Index | 品种 Variety | NaCl浓度 NaCl concentration /(mmol·L-1) | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0(CK) | 50 | 100 | 150 | 200 | 250 | 300 | 350 | 400 | ||
叶片K+含量 K+ content in leaf/ (mmol·g-1) | NXSG56 | 0.90 c | 0.83 b | 0.80 b | 0.79 bc | 0.71 b | 0.58 c | 0.53 b | 0.51 b | 0.42 b |
NXSG85 | 1.04 a | 0.93 a | 0.89 a | 0.82 b | 0.79 a | 0.72 a | 0.69 a | 0.61 a | 0.47 a | |
HP9 | 0.88 c | 0.80 c | 0.79 b | 0.78 c | 0.76 a | 0.64 b | 0.51 c | 0.43 c | 0.38 c | |
GY3 | 0.97 b | 0.94 a | 0.90 a | 0.89 a | 0.78 a | 0.66 b | 0.53 c | 0.41 c | 0.35 d | |
QA13-9 | 0.88 c | 0.72 d | 0.69 c | 0.57 d | 0.60 c | 0.46 d | 0.44 d | 0.37 d | 0.33 d | |
叶片Na+含量 Na+ content in leaf/(mmol·g-1) | NXSG56 | 0.11 b | 0.15 b | 0.20 b | 0.28 b | 0.36 b | 0.47 b | 0.59 b | 0.66 b | 0.79 b |
NXSG85 | 0.16 a | 0.23 a | 0.29 a | 0.35 a | 0.46 a | 0.55 a | 0.71 a | 0.77 a | 0.88 a | |
HP9 | 0.09 bc | 0.10 c | 0.14 c | 0.19 d | 0.26 d | 0.38 c | 0.47 d | 0.53 d | 0.67 d | |
GY3 | 0.07 cd | 0.09 c | 0.12 c | 0.23 c | 0.30 c | 0.43 bc | 0.54 c | 0.59 c | 0.62 e | |
QA13-9 | 0.06 d | 0.07 d | 0.09 d | 0.10 e | 0.13 e | 0.15 d | 0.34 e | 0.58 c | 0.72 b | |
叶片K+/Na+ K+/Na+ in leaf | NXSG56 | 8.54 bc | 5.71 c | 4.03 c | 2.88 c | 2.00 d | 1.25 b | 0.90 c | 0.78 c | 0.53 c |
NXSG85 | 7.64 c | 9.15 ab | 7.62 a | 7.34 a | 6.07 a | 6.38 a | 2.61 a | 1.61 a | 1.44 a | |
HP9 | 10.15 b | 7.79 b | 5.85 b | 4.05 b | 2.94 b | 1.66 b | 1.10 b | 0.80 c | 0.57 c | |
GY3 | 14.07 a | 10.49 a | 7.57 a | 3.87 b | 2.61 c | 1.55 b | 0.98 c | 0.70 d | 0.56 c | |
QA13-9 | 2.10 d | 1.64 d | 1.51 d | 1.31 d | 1.31 c | 1.04 b | 0.98 c | 0.94 b | 1.00 b |
Table 3 Effect of NaCl on K+,Na+ contents and K+/Na+ of quinoa seedlings
指标 Index | 品种 Variety | NaCl浓度 NaCl concentration /(mmol·L-1) | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0(CK) | 50 | 100 | 150 | 200 | 250 | 300 | 350 | 400 | ||
叶片K+含量 K+ content in leaf/ (mmol·g-1) | NXSG56 | 0.90 c | 0.83 b | 0.80 b | 0.79 bc | 0.71 b | 0.58 c | 0.53 b | 0.51 b | 0.42 b |
NXSG85 | 1.04 a | 0.93 a | 0.89 a | 0.82 b | 0.79 a | 0.72 a | 0.69 a | 0.61 a | 0.47 a | |
HP9 | 0.88 c | 0.80 c | 0.79 b | 0.78 c | 0.76 a | 0.64 b | 0.51 c | 0.43 c | 0.38 c | |
GY3 | 0.97 b | 0.94 a | 0.90 a | 0.89 a | 0.78 a | 0.66 b | 0.53 c | 0.41 c | 0.35 d | |
QA13-9 | 0.88 c | 0.72 d | 0.69 c | 0.57 d | 0.60 c | 0.46 d | 0.44 d | 0.37 d | 0.33 d | |
叶片Na+含量 Na+ content in leaf/(mmol·g-1) | NXSG56 | 0.11 b | 0.15 b | 0.20 b | 0.28 b | 0.36 b | 0.47 b | 0.59 b | 0.66 b | 0.79 b |
NXSG85 | 0.16 a | 0.23 a | 0.29 a | 0.35 a | 0.46 a | 0.55 a | 0.71 a | 0.77 a | 0.88 a | |
HP9 | 0.09 bc | 0.10 c | 0.14 c | 0.19 d | 0.26 d | 0.38 c | 0.47 d | 0.53 d | 0.67 d | |
GY3 | 0.07 cd | 0.09 c | 0.12 c | 0.23 c | 0.30 c | 0.43 bc | 0.54 c | 0.59 c | 0.62 e | |
QA13-9 | 0.06 d | 0.07 d | 0.09 d | 0.10 e | 0.13 e | 0.15 d | 0.34 e | 0.58 c | 0.72 b | |
叶片K+/Na+ K+/Na+ in leaf | NXSG56 | 8.54 bc | 5.71 c | 4.03 c | 2.88 c | 2.00 d | 1.25 b | 0.90 c | 0.78 c | 0.53 c |
NXSG85 | 7.64 c | 9.15 ab | 7.62 a | 7.34 a | 6.07 a | 6.38 a | 2.61 a | 1.61 a | 1.44 a | |
HP9 | 10.15 b | 7.79 b | 5.85 b | 4.05 b | 2.94 b | 1.66 b | 1.10 b | 0.80 c | 0.57 c | |
GY3 | 14.07 a | 10.49 a | 7.57 a | 3.87 b | 2.61 c | 1.55 b | 0.98 c | 0.70 d | 0.56 c | |
QA13-9 | 2.10 d | 1.64 d | 1.51 d | 1.31 d | 1.31 c | 1.04 b | 0.98 c | 0.94 b | 1.00 b |
Fig. 6 Effects of NaCl stress on MDA contents of quinoa seedlingsNote: Different small letters of the same NaCl concentration indicate significant difference at P<0.05 level.
Fig. 7 Effects of NaCl stress on the activities of SOD of quinoa seedlingsNote: Different small letters of the same NaCl concentration indicate significant difference at P<0.05 level.
指标 Index | 取样 时间 Sampling time/d | 品种 Variety | NaCl浓度 NaCl concentration/(mmol·L-1) | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0(CK) | 50 | 100 | 150 | 200 | 250 | 300 | 350 | 400 | |||
地上部分鲜重 Fresh weight of above-ground part/g | 5 | NXSG56 | 1.844 2 b | 1.230 2 d | 1.120 0 d | 1.030 4 d | 0.930 0 d | 0.750 3 d | 0.611 1 e | 0.490 1 d | 0.370 1 d |
NXSG85 | 2.343 3 a | 2.049 9 a | 1.909 9 a | 1.576 7 a | 1.249 9 a | 1.020 2 a | 0.950 7 a | 0.840 2 a | 0.800 2 a | ||
HP9 | 1.820 6 c | 1.329 4 b | 1.170 0 c | 1.109 8 b | 1.050 0 b | 0.920 0 b | 0.930 0 b | 0.800 3 b | 0.720 0 b | ||
GY3 | 1.540 1 d | 1.280 1 c | 1.200 0 b | 1.080 5 c | 1.010 1 c | 0.849 9 c | 0.730 0 c | 0.530 0 c | 0.450 0 c | ||
QA13-9 | 1.320 1 e | 1.100 3 e | 1.030 0 e | 0.950 1 e | 0.870 2 e | 0.750 0 d | 0.620 0 d | 0.410 1 e | 0.250 1 e | ||
10 | NXSG56 | 2.820 0 c | 2.570 1 a | 2.120 1 c | 1.979 9 b | 1.510 1 b | 1.229 9 c | 1.010 1 b | 0.779 6 d | 0.280 0 b | |
NXSG85 | 3.920 1 a | 2.320 4 a | 3.070 1 a | 2.540 2 a | 1.970 2 a | 1.670 0 a | 1.350 1 a | 1.170 0 a | 0.890 0 a | ||
HP9 | 2.269 9 e | 2.130 0 a | 2.030 0 d | 1.780 0 c | 1.350 0 c | 1.120 1 d | 0.950 0 d | 0.590 0 b | 0.150 0 e | ||
GY3 | 2.320 0 d | 2.140 0 a | 1.950 1 e | 1.620 0 d | 1.330 1 d | 1.250 8 b | 0.998 1 c | 0.745 1 c | 0.244 9 c | ||
QA13-9 | 3.140 4 b | 3.016 0 a | 2.672 0 b | 1.581 4 e | 1.105 7 e | 0.994 0 e | 0.726 1 e | 0.372 3 e | 0.208 7 d | ||
15 | NXSG56 | 4.238 2 b | 3.861 7 a | 3.066 8 a | 2.489 5 a | 2.148 6 b | 1.598 8 b | 1.150 9 b | 0.967 8 b | 0.476 7 b | |
NXSG85 | 4.920 8 a | 3.983 3 a | 3.214 8 a | 2.483 0 a | 2.380 1 a | 1.785 5 a | 1.342 5 a | 1.268 4 a | 0.892 1 a | ||
HP9 | 3.882 7 c | 3.697 5 a | 3.126 9 a | 2.178 9 b | 2.086 6 b | 1.480 1 b | 1.132 8 b | 0.887 6 b | 0.388 4 bc | ||
GY3 | 3.532 8 d | 3.135 8 b | 3.026 2 a | 1.768 9 c | 1.016 0 c | 0.952 9 c | 0.822 1 c | 0.586 6 c | 0.296 2 cd | ||
QA13-9 | 3.146 0 e | 3.016 1 b | 2.671 0 b | 1.583 0 c | 1.105 7 c | 0.991 8 c | 0.725 9 c | 0.379 9 d | 0.207 6 d | ||
地上部分干重 Dry weight of above-ground part/g | 5 | NXSG56 | 0.134 5 c | 0.152 2 c | 0.150 2 c | 0.128 9 c | 0.118 6 b | 0.108 9 c | 0.100 0 c | 0.089 6 c | 0.052 3 c |
NXSG85 | 0.235 9 a | 0.188 8 b | 0.174 2 b | 0.145 3 b | 0.135 2 a | 0.115 1 b | 0.110 2 b | 0.102 8 b | 0.079 1 b | ||
HP9 | 0.213 6 b | 0.201 1 a | 0.184 9 a | 0.148 3 a | 0.135 3 a | 0.121 8 a | 0.120 3 a | 0.110 1 a | 0.084 2 a | ||
GY3 | 0.120 1 d | 0.123 2 d | 0.131 2 d | 0.110 2 d | 0.109 8 c | 0.105 4 d | 0.100 1 c | 0.074 4 d | 0.051 3 c | ||
QA13-9 | 0.119 4 d | 0.118 5 e | 0.109 7 e | 0.108 5 e | 0.106 4 d | 0.104 2 d | 0.097 7 d | 0.054 2 e | 0.048 3 d | ||
10 | NXSG56 | 0.245 8 c | 0.210 2 b | 0.187 5 c | 0.164 8 c | 0.123 5 d | 0.110 2 e | 0.101 0 d | 0.098 5 c | 0.065 8 c | |
NXSG85 | 0.278 4 a | 0.248 5 a | 0.213 1 a | 0.200 1 a | 0.189 4 a | 0.140 4 b | 0.121 2 b | 0.112 3 b | 0.059 8 d | ||
HP9 | 0.252 9 b | 0.247 8 a | 0.212 1 b | 0.175 8 b | 0.153 6 b | 0.145 1 a | 0.133 6 a | 0.123 9 a | 0.089 7 a | ||
GY3 | 0.215 8 d | 0.200 3 c | 0.174 6 d | 0.163 1 d | 0.130 3 c | 0.120 8 c | 0.110 9 c | 0.087 5 d | 0.068 5 b | ||
QA13-9 | 0.188 5 e | 0.160 1 d | 0.143 8 e | 0.128 6 e | 0.122 3 e | 0.114 7 d | 0.100 9 d | 0.074 5 e | 0.0538 e | ||
15 | NXSG56 | 0.534 3 a | 0.431 8 a | 0.395 7 a | 0.301 3 a | 0.256 0 a | 0.204 4 a | 0.141 4 b | 0.106 9 b | 0.073 9 c | |
NXSG85 | 0.490 1 b | 0.410 1 b | 0.350 1 b | 0.275 1 b | 0.250 1 a | 0.168 3 b | 0.149 5 a | 0.108 3 b | 0.085 0 b | ||
HP9 | 0.410 1 c | 0.303 2 c | 0.282 9 c | 0.210 4 c | 0.180 0 b | 0.163 3 b | 0.153 1 a | 0.132 6 a | 0.102 9 a | ||
GY3 | 0.290 0 d | 0.250 5 d | 0.198 7 d | 0.185 2 d | 0.159 5 c | 0.147 3 c | 0.126 0 c | 0.103 8 b | 0.087 8 b | ||
QA13-9 | 0.270 0 e | 0.230 0 e | 0.190 0 d | 0.163 4 e | 0.149 4 c | 0.129 6 d | 0.113 2 d | 0.090 2 c | 0.070 1 c | ||
地下部分鲜重 Fresh weight of under-ground part/g | 5 | NXSG56 | 0.032 4 c | 0.033 0 b | 0.031 1 c | 0.042 6 c | 0.053 8 c | 0.042 9 b | 0.035 8 c | 0.029 6 c | 0.020 3 c |
NXSG85 | 0.042 2 b | 0.049 5 a | 0.053 7 a | 0.058 9 a | 0.067 4 a | 0.056 3 a | 0.049 4 b | 0.038 1 a | 0.033 3 a | ||
HP9 | 0.043 5 a | 0.048 8 a | 0.052 1 b | 0.054 3 b | 0.065 1 b | 0.057 0 a | 0.051 4 a | 0.036 4 b | 0.031 0 b | ||
GY3 | 0.028 5 d | 0.028 2 c | 0.030 6 c | 0.041 5 d | 0.048 5 d | 0.035 7 e | 0.030 3 d | 0.024 4 d | 0.019 8 c | ||
QA13-9 | 0.021 5 e | 0.023 7 d | 0.029 3 d | 0.032 7 e | 0.041 4 e | 0.032 8 d | 0.029 4 e | 0.020 2 e | 0.017 5 d |
Table 2 Effect of NaCl on biomasses of quinoa seedlings
指标 Index | 取样 时间 Sampling time/d | 品种 Variety | NaCl浓度 NaCl concentration/(mmol·L-1) | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0(CK) | 50 | 100 | 150 | 200 | 250 | 300 | 350 | 400 | |||
地上部分鲜重 Fresh weight of above-ground part/g | 5 | NXSG56 | 1.844 2 b | 1.230 2 d | 1.120 0 d | 1.030 4 d | 0.930 0 d | 0.750 3 d | 0.611 1 e | 0.490 1 d | 0.370 1 d |
NXSG85 | 2.343 3 a | 2.049 9 a | 1.909 9 a | 1.576 7 a | 1.249 9 a | 1.020 2 a | 0.950 7 a | 0.840 2 a | 0.800 2 a | ||
HP9 | 1.820 6 c | 1.329 4 b | 1.170 0 c | 1.109 8 b | 1.050 0 b | 0.920 0 b | 0.930 0 b | 0.800 3 b | 0.720 0 b | ||
GY3 | 1.540 1 d | 1.280 1 c | 1.200 0 b | 1.080 5 c | 1.010 1 c | 0.849 9 c | 0.730 0 c | 0.530 0 c | 0.450 0 c | ||
QA13-9 | 1.320 1 e | 1.100 3 e | 1.030 0 e | 0.950 1 e | 0.870 2 e | 0.750 0 d | 0.620 0 d | 0.410 1 e | 0.250 1 e | ||
10 | NXSG56 | 2.820 0 c | 2.570 1 a | 2.120 1 c | 1.979 9 b | 1.510 1 b | 1.229 9 c | 1.010 1 b | 0.779 6 d | 0.280 0 b | |
NXSG85 | 3.920 1 a | 2.320 4 a | 3.070 1 a | 2.540 2 a | 1.970 2 a | 1.670 0 a | 1.350 1 a | 1.170 0 a | 0.890 0 a | ||
HP9 | 2.269 9 e | 2.130 0 a | 2.030 0 d | 1.780 0 c | 1.350 0 c | 1.120 1 d | 0.950 0 d | 0.590 0 b | 0.150 0 e | ||
GY3 | 2.320 0 d | 2.140 0 a | 1.950 1 e | 1.620 0 d | 1.330 1 d | 1.250 8 b | 0.998 1 c | 0.745 1 c | 0.244 9 c | ||
QA13-9 | 3.140 4 b | 3.016 0 a | 2.672 0 b | 1.581 4 e | 1.105 7 e | 0.994 0 e | 0.726 1 e | 0.372 3 e | 0.208 7 d | ||
15 | NXSG56 | 4.238 2 b | 3.861 7 a | 3.066 8 a | 2.489 5 a | 2.148 6 b | 1.598 8 b | 1.150 9 b | 0.967 8 b | 0.476 7 b | |
NXSG85 | 4.920 8 a | 3.983 3 a | 3.214 8 a | 2.483 0 a | 2.380 1 a | 1.785 5 a | 1.342 5 a | 1.268 4 a | 0.892 1 a | ||
HP9 | 3.882 7 c | 3.697 5 a | 3.126 9 a | 2.178 9 b | 2.086 6 b | 1.480 1 b | 1.132 8 b | 0.887 6 b | 0.388 4 bc | ||
GY3 | 3.532 8 d | 3.135 8 b | 3.026 2 a | 1.768 9 c | 1.016 0 c | 0.952 9 c | 0.822 1 c | 0.586 6 c | 0.296 2 cd | ||
QA13-9 | 3.146 0 e | 3.016 1 b | 2.671 0 b | 1.583 0 c | 1.105 7 c | 0.991 8 c | 0.725 9 c | 0.379 9 d | 0.207 6 d | ||
地上部分干重 Dry weight of above-ground part/g | 5 | NXSG56 | 0.134 5 c | 0.152 2 c | 0.150 2 c | 0.128 9 c | 0.118 6 b | 0.108 9 c | 0.100 0 c | 0.089 6 c | 0.052 3 c |
NXSG85 | 0.235 9 a | 0.188 8 b | 0.174 2 b | 0.145 3 b | 0.135 2 a | 0.115 1 b | 0.110 2 b | 0.102 8 b | 0.079 1 b | ||
HP9 | 0.213 6 b | 0.201 1 a | 0.184 9 a | 0.148 3 a | 0.135 3 a | 0.121 8 a | 0.120 3 a | 0.110 1 a | 0.084 2 a | ||
GY3 | 0.120 1 d | 0.123 2 d | 0.131 2 d | 0.110 2 d | 0.109 8 c | 0.105 4 d | 0.100 1 c | 0.074 4 d | 0.051 3 c | ||
QA13-9 | 0.119 4 d | 0.118 5 e | 0.109 7 e | 0.108 5 e | 0.106 4 d | 0.104 2 d | 0.097 7 d | 0.054 2 e | 0.048 3 d | ||
10 | NXSG56 | 0.245 8 c | 0.210 2 b | 0.187 5 c | 0.164 8 c | 0.123 5 d | 0.110 2 e | 0.101 0 d | 0.098 5 c | 0.065 8 c | |
NXSG85 | 0.278 4 a | 0.248 5 a | 0.213 1 a | 0.200 1 a | 0.189 4 a | 0.140 4 b | 0.121 2 b | 0.112 3 b | 0.059 8 d | ||
HP9 | 0.252 9 b | 0.247 8 a | 0.212 1 b | 0.175 8 b | 0.153 6 b | 0.145 1 a | 0.133 6 a | 0.123 9 a | 0.089 7 a | ||
GY3 | 0.215 8 d | 0.200 3 c | 0.174 6 d | 0.163 1 d | 0.130 3 c | 0.120 8 c | 0.110 9 c | 0.087 5 d | 0.068 5 b | ||
QA13-9 | 0.188 5 e | 0.160 1 d | 0.143 8 e | 0.128 6 e | 0.122 3 e | 0.114 7 d | 0.100 9 d | 0.074 5 e | 0.0538 e | ||
15 | NXSG56 | 0.534 3 a | 0.431 8 a | 0.395 7 a | 0.301 3 a | 0.256 0 a | 0.204 4 a | 0.141 4 b | 0.106 9 b | 0.073 9 c | |
NXSG85 | 0.490 1 b | 0.410 1 b | 0.350 1 b | 0.275 1 b | 0.250 1 a | 0.168 3 b | 0.149 5 a | 0.108 3 b | 0.085 0 b | ||
HP9 | 0.410 1 c | 0.303 2 c | 0.282 9 c | 0.210 4 c | 0.180 0 b | 0.163 3 b | 0.153 1 a | 0.132 6 a | 0.102 9 a | ||
GY3 | 0.290 0 d | 0.250 5 d | 0.198 7 d | 0.185 2 d | 0.159 5 c | 0.147 3 c | 0.126 0 c | 0.103 8 b | 0.087 8 b | ||
QA13-9 | 0.270 0 e | 0.230 0 e | 0.190 0 d | 0.163 4 e | 0.149 4 c | 0.129 6 d | 0.113 2 d | 0.090 2 c | 0.070 1 c | ||
地下部分鲜重 Fresh weight of under-ground part/g | 5 | NXSG56 | 0.032 4 c | 0.033 0 b | 0.031 1 c | 0.042 6 c | 0.053 8 c | 0.042 9 b | 0.035 8 c | 0.029 6 c | 0.020 3 c |
NXSG85 | 0.042 2 b | 0.049 5 a | 0.053 7 a | 0.058 9 a | 0.067 4 a | 0.056 3 a | 0.049 4 b | 0.038 1 a | 0.033 3 a | ||
HP9 | 0.043 5 a | 0.048 8 a | 0.052 1 b | 0.054 3 b | 0.065 1 b | 0.057 0 a | 0.051 4 a | 0.036 4 b | 0.031 0 b | ||
GY3 | 0.028 5 d | 0.028 2 c | 0.030 6 c | 0.041 5 d | 0.048 5 d | 0.035 7 e | 0.030 3 d | 0.024 4 d | 0.019 8 c | ||
QA13-9 | 0.021 5 e | 0.023 7 d | 0.029 3 d | 0.032 7 e | 0.041 4 e | 0.032 8 d | 0.029 4 e | 0.020 2 e | 0.017 5 d |
1 | 杨少辉, 季静, 王罡,等. 盐胁迫对植物影响的研究进展[J]. 分子植物育种, 2006,4(3):139-142. |
YANG S H, JI J, WANG G,et al.. Effect of salt stress on the plant [J]. Mol. Plant Breeding, 2006,4(3):139-142. | |
2 | 周海涛, 刘浩, 么杨,等. 藜麦在张家口地区试种的表现与评价[J]. 植物遗传资源学报, 2014,15(1):222-227. |
ZHOU H T, LIU H, YAO Y, et al.. Evaluation of agronomic and quality characters of quinoa cultivated in Zhangjiakou [J]. J. Plant Genet. Resour., 2014,15(1):222-227. | |
3 | PRADO F E, BOERO C, GALLARDO M, et al.. Effect of NaCl on germination, growth, and soluble sugar content in Chenopodium quinoa Willd. seeds [J]. Bot. Bull. Academia Sin., 2000,41(1):27-34. |
4 | 刘凤岐, 刘杰琳, 朱瑞芬, 等. 4种燕麦对NaCl胁迫的生理响应及耐盐性评价[J]. 草业学报, 2015, 24(1):183-189. |
LIU F Q, LIU J L, ZHU R F, et al.. Physiological responses and tolerance of four varieties to salt stress [J]. Acta Pratac. Sin., 2015, 24(1):183-189. | |
5 | 张利霞, 常青山, 侯小改, 等. 不同钠盐胁迫对夏枯草种子萌发特性的影响[J]. 草业学报, 2015,24(3):177-185. |
ZHANG L X, CHANG Q S, HOU X G, et al.. Effects of sodium salt stress on seed germination of Prunella vulgares [J].Acta Pratac. Sin., 2015,24(3):177-185. | |
6 | 李合生. 植物生理生化实验原理与技术[M].北京:高等教育出版社, 2000:169-184. |
7 | 侯建华, 于海峰, 安玉麟. 盐分胁迫对向日葵 K+ 、Na+吸收与分配的影响[J].华北农学报, 2013, 28(2): 139-143. |
HOU J H, YU H F, AN Y L. Research on changing of K+, Na+of sunflower under salinity stress [J]. Acta Agric. Boreali-Sin., 2013, 28(2): 139-143. | |
8 | 遆晋松, 童文杰, 周媛媛,等. 河套灌区向日葵耐盐指标评价[J]. 中国生态农业学报, 2014, 22(2): 177-184. |
TI J S, TONG W J, ZHOU Y Y, et al.. Evaluation of salinity tolerance index of sunflower in Hetao irrigation district [J]. Chin. J. Eco-Agric., 2014, 22(2): 177-184. | |
9 | 谢英赞,何平,王朝英,等. 外源 Ca2+,SA, NO对盐胁迫下决明幼苗生理特性的影响[J]. 西南大学学报(自然科学版), 2013,35(3):36-43. |
XIE Y Z, HE P, WANG C Y, et al.. Effects of Ca2+,SA, NO on physical signs of cassiae seedlings [J]. J. Southwest Univ. (Nat. Sci.), 2013,35(3):36-43. | |
10 | 马红媛, 梁正伟, 孔祥军, 等. 盐分、温度及其互作对羊草种子发芽率和幼苗生长的影响[J]. 生态学报, 2008, 28(10): 4710-4717. |
MA H Y, LIANG Z W, KONG X J, et al.. Effects of salinity, temperature and their interaction on the germination percentage and seedling growth of Leymus chinensis (Trin.) Tzvel. (Poaceae)[J]. Acta Ecol. Sin., 2008, 28(10):4710-4717. | |
11 | MACKE A J, UNGER I A. The effect of salinity on germination and early growth of Puccinella nuttallinana [J]. Canadian J. Bot., 1971,49:515-520. |
12 | 王飞, 刘世增, 刘有军. 沙地云杉和青海云杉种子萌发和幼苗生长对干旱盐碱胁迫的响应[J]. 西北植物学报, 2014,34(11):2309-2316. |
WANG F, LIU S Z, LIU Y J. Response of Picea mongolica and Picea crassiflia seed germination and seedling growth to drought and salt stress [J]. Acta Bot. Bor-Occid. Sin., 2014,34(11):2309-2316. | |
13 | 杨发荣, 刘文瑜, 黄杰, 等. 不同藜麦品种对盐胁迫的生理响应及耐盐评价[J]. 草业学报, 2017, 26(12):77-88. |
YANG F R, LIU W Y, HUANG J,et al.. Physiological responses of different quinoa varieties to salt stress and evaluation of salt tolerance [J]. Acta Pratac. Sin., 2017, 26(12):77-88. | |
14 | 宋旭丽, 侯喜林, 胡春梅, 等. NaCl胁迫对超大甜椒种子萌发和幼苗生长的影响[J]. 西北植物学报, 2011, 31(3):569-575. |
SONG X L, HOU X L, HU C M, et al.. Seed germination and seedling growth of sweet pepper under NaCl stress [J]. Acta Bot. Bor-Occid. Sin., 2011, 31(3):569-575. | |
15 | 马琳. NaCl胁迫对牧草种子萌发与幼苗生理生化的影响及耐盐性评价[D]. 山东泰安: 山东农业大学, 2010. |
MA L. Effects of NaCl stress on seed germination and seedling physiology and biochemistry and evaluation of salt tolerance [D]. Shandong Taian: Shandong Agricultural University, 2010. | |
16 | 翁锦周, 林江波, 林加耕, 等. 盐胁迫对桉树幼苗的生长及叶绿素含量的影响[J].热带作物学报, 2007, 28(4):15-20. |
WENG J Z, LIN J B, LIN J G, et al.. Effects of salt stress on the growth and chlorophyll content of eucalyptus robusta Smith seedlings [J]. Chin. J. Trop. Crops, 2007, 28(4):15-20. | |
17 | 刘晓青. NaCl胁迫对藜麦种子萌发和幼苗生理生化特性的影响[D].合肥:安徽农业大学,2016. |
LIU X Q. Effects of NaCl stress on seed germination and physiological and biochemical characteristics of quinoa seedlings [D]. Hefei: Anhui Agricultural University,2016. | |
18 | 柯玉琴, 潘廷国. NaCl胁迫对甘薯叶片叶绿体超微结构及一些酶活性的影响[J]. 植物生理学报, 1999, 25(3):229-233,315-316. |
KE Y Q, PAN T G. Effects of NaCl stress on chlorophyll ultrastructure and enzyme activities of sweet potato leaves [J]. Acta Phytophysiol. Sin., 1999, 25(3):229-233,315-316. | |
19 | LI M, ZHANG J, LI Y J. Effects of salt stress on physiological indexes of Osier variety L0911 [J]. Acta Agric. Jiangxi, 2012,24(8):56-58. |
20 | 刘雅辉, 王秀萍, 张国新, 等. 棉花苗期耐盐生理指标的筛选及综合评价[J].中国农学通报, 2012, 28(6):73-78. |
LIU Y H, WANG X P, ZHANG G X, et al.. Study on selection of physiological indices for salt tolerance and comprehensive evaluation of cotton during seedling stage [J]. Chin. Agric. Sci. Bull., 2012, 28(6):73-78. | |
21 | KIM S W, JEONG H J, JUNG K H. Integrating omics analysis of salt stress - responsive genes in rice [J]. Genes Genomics,2015,37(8):645-655. |
22 | 刘自刚, 王志江, 方圆, 等. NaCl胁迫对白菜型冬油菜种子萌发和幼苗生理的影响[J]. 中国油料作物学报, 2017,39(3) :351-359. |
LIU Z G, WANG Z J, FANG Y, et al.. Effect of salt stress on seed germination and seedling physiology of winter rapeseed (Brassica rapa L.) [J]. Chin. J. Oil Crop Sci.,2017,39(3) :351-359. | |
23 | 高俊凤. 植物生理学实验技术[M]. 北京:高等教育出版社, 2010:101-103. |
24 | 朱红霞, 郭晖, 张家洋. NaCl 胁迫对龟背竹生理生化特性的影响[J]. 河南农业科学, 2016, 45(9): 98-101, 106. |
ZHU H X, GUO H, ZHANG J Y. Effect of NaCl stress on physiological and biochemical characteristics of M. deliciosa Liebm [J]. J. Henan Agric. Sci., 2016,45(9):98-101, 106. | |
25 | 周丽, 郎多勇, 张文晋, 等. NaCl 胁迫对银柴胡生长及生理生化特性的影响[J]. 中草药, 2014,45(19):2829-2833. |
ZHOU L, LANG D Y, ZHANG W J,et al.. Effect of NaCl stress on growth and physiological-biochemical characteristics of Stellaria dichotoma [J]. Chin. Traditional Herbal Drugs, 2014, 45(19):2829-2833. |
[1] | Tianwei PENG, Huiya XIE, Sijun LI, Yixuan LIU, Kaifeng SHUAI, Yuanyuan PENG, Qing WANG, Diqin LI. Effects of Sodium Dinitrate with Bacillus Sbutilis Complex on Growth and Physiological Indexes of Tobacco Seedlings [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2022, 24(4): 154-161. |
[2] | Tianming QI, Zhijian LI, Peiyou QIN, Guixing REN, Bangwei ZHOU. Research and Application Prospect of Quinoa Cultivation Technology [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2022, 24(3): 157-165. |
[3] | JIANG Xuehai, LUO Deqiang, LI Min, JI Guangmei, JIANG Mingjin, LI Lijiang, Li Ganghua, ZHOU Weijia, ZHANG Jiafeng. Influences of Planting Density on Yield and Nitrogen Use Efficiency in New Indica Hybrid Rice Varieties by Bowl-Seedling-Mechanical-Transplanting [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2021, 23(8): 173-184. |
[4] | LUO Lisha, LIAO Guiping, LIU Fan, GUAN Chunyun. Rape Variety Identification Based on Canopy Spectral Parameters [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2021, 23(7): 93-106. |
[5] | XIAO Feifei, JIANG Ping, HU Wenwu, LIAO Ronghua, ZHANG Danhui, JIN Sheng. Recognition Algorithm of Extremum Point Clustering Seedling Belt Based on Offset Compensation Model [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2021, 23(5): 86-97. |
[6] | GU Huimin1, CHEN Bolang1*, SUN Jin2. Influences of Mycorrhizal Seedling on Growth and Physiological Characteristics of Processing Tomato Under Salt Stress#br# [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2021, 23(3): 166-177. |
[7] | ZHANG Luxiang1, CHEN Simeng1, ZHENG Cong2, JIN Yinan1, HAN Yi3, XU Zicheng1, HUANG Wuxing1, SHAO Huifang1*. Influences of Different Deacclimation Duration on Drought Resistance of Tobacco Seedlings#br# [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2021, 23(2): 57-64. |
[8] | QUAN Wei, WU Mingliang, GUAN Chunyun, LUO Haifeng. Experimental Study on the Shape Optimization of Soil Opener for Rapeseed Pot Seedling Transplanter [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2021, 23(10): 97-106. |
[9] | YANG Zhen1,2, YANG Xin1*, YANG Xiaobin1, WANG Pengfei1, LI Jianping1, LIU Hongjie1, LI Xuejun1. Parameter Optimization Design of Apple Seedling Stubble Cutter Based on Virtual Orthogonal Test [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2021, 23(1): 98-106. |
[10] | YANG Ruiping1, LIU Ruixiang1, MA Yingmei1*, Guo Zhanbin2, ZHANG Hongwu2, BAI Yu1, ZHAO Xinyu1. Evaluation of Different Chenopodium quinoa Resources and Effects of Osmotic Regulators on Their Drought Resistance [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2020, 22(9): 52-60. |
[11] | ZHANG Jiawen, LU Shaohao, ZHAO Zhe, ZHAO Mingqin*. Influences of Exogenous Melatonin on Physiological Properties of Tobacco Seedlings Under Low Temperature Stress [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2020, 22(9): 78-86. |
[12] | ZHANG Chen, HAN Ting, MA Jie, YANG Juan, LIU Genhong, ZHENG Guoqi*. Effect of Different Ridging Height on Growth and Physiological Characteristics of Lycium ruthenicum Murr. [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2020, 22(9): 153-161. |
[13] | LIU Zhe, WU Wei, ZHANG Shanwen, CUI Qianqian, LI Ruiyang. Estimating Wheat Planting Density Based on Multiple Ridge Regression [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2020, 22(6): 72-80. |
[14] |
ZOU Fang, YANG Xiuliu, HUANG Siqi, WANG Zhiheng, WEI Yuqing*.
Effect of Exogenous Spermine on Growth and Physiological and Biochemical Indexes of Sweet Sorghum Seedlings
under Drought Stress
[J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2020, 22(4): 44-52.
|
[15] | HU Bo, YAN Wei*, LIU Yu, HAO Yanling. Physiological Characteristics of Three Mulberry #br# Species in Response to Salt Stress [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2020, 22(4): 61-67. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||