Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology ›› 2023, Vol. 25 ›› Issue (3): 107-118.DOI: 10.13304/j.nykjdb.2021.0929
• INTELLIGENT AGRICULTURE & AGRICULTURAL MACHINERY • Previous Articles
Yuting YU1,2,3(), Pingzeng LIU1,2,3, Xiuli WANG1, Yan ZHANG1,2,3(
), Shen WANG1,2,3, Chengbao SONG2,3, Feng MA4
Received:
2021-11-02
Accepted:
2022-05-05
Online:
2023-03-15
Published:
2023-05-22
Contact:
Yan ZHANG
于玉婷1,2,3(), 柳平增1,2,3, 王秀丽1, 张艳1,2,3(
), 王珅1,2,3, 宋成宝2,3, 马峰4
通讯作者:
张艳
作者简介:
于玉婷 E-mail:yutingyu_2021@163.com;
基金资助:
CLC Number:
Yuting YU, Pingzeng LIU, Xiuli WANG, Yan ZHANG, Shen WANG, Chengbao SONG, Feng MA. Study on Location of Temperature Sensors in Tomato Solar Greenhouse in North China[J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2023, 25(3): 107-118.
于玉婷, 柳平增, 王秀丽, 张艳, 王珅, 宋成宝, 马峰. 北方番茄日光温室温度传感器布设位置研究[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2023, 25(3): 107-118.
参数Parameter | 值Value | 标准误差Standard error | 显著性Statistical significance | 相关性Correlation |
---|---|---|---|---|
y0 | 20.725 | 0.036 | <0.001*** | 0.799*** |
Xc1 | 718.104 | 0.205 | <0.001*** | 0.895*** |
A1 | 98.517 | 3.778 | <0.001*** | 0.937*** |
W1 | 11.536 | 0.401 | <0.001*** | 0.898*** |
Xc2 | 726.635 | 0.152 | <0.001*** | 0.754*** |
A2 | 34.727 | 5.060 | <0.001*** | 0.981*** |
W2 | 6.273 | 0.432 | <0.001*** | 0.887*** |
Xc3 | 736.666 | 0.173 | <0.001*** | 0.853*** |
A3 | 142.610 | 5.640 | <0.001*** | 0.964*** |
W3 | 14.746 | 0.585 | <0.001*** | 0.952*** |
Xc4 | 760.133 | 0.314 | <0.001*** | 0.961*** |
A4 | 216.719 | 20.278 | <0.001*** | 0.997*** |
W4 | 18.656 | 0.668 | <0.001*** | 0.968*** |
Xc5 | 780.404 | 1.268 | <0.001*** | 0.979*** |
A5 | 135.128 | 43.710 | 0.002** | 0.999*** |
W5 | 27.927 | 4.569 | <0.001*** | 0.994*** |
Xc6 | 808.323 | 5.353 | <0.001*** | 0.993*** |
A6 | 105.444 | 29.975 | <0.001*** | 0.996*** |
W6 | 42.972 | 6.527 | <0.001*** | 0.983*** |
Table 1 Multi-peak fitting parameters
参数Parameter | 值Value | 标准误差Standard error | 显著性Statistical significance | 相关性Correlation |
---|---|---|---|---|
y0 | 20.725 | 0.036 | <0.001*** | 0.799*** |
Xc1 | 718.104 | 0.205 | <0.001*** | 0.895*** |
A1 | 98.517 | 3.778 | <0.001*** | 0.937*** |
W1 | 11.536 | 0.401 | <0.001*** | 0.898*** |
Xc2 | 726.635 | 0.152 | <0.001*** | 0.754*** |
A2 | 34.727 | 5.060 | <0.001*** | 0.981*** |
W2 | 6.273 | 0.432 | <0.001*** | 0.887*** |
Xc3 | 736.666 | 0.173 | <0.001*** | 0.853*** |
A3 | 142.610 | 5.640 | <0.001*** | 0.964*** |
W3 | 14.746 | 0.585 | <0.001*** | 0.952*** |
Xc4 | 760.133 | 0.314 | <0.001*** | 0.961*** |
A4 | 216.719 | 20.278 | <0.001*** | 0.997*** |
W4 | 18.656 | 0.668 | <0.001*** | 0.968*** |
Xc5 | 780.404 | 1.268 | <0.001*** | 0.979*** |
A5 | 135.128 | 43.710 | 0.002** | 0.999*** |
W5 | 27.927 | 4.569 | <0.001*** | 0.994*** |
Xc6 | 808.323 | 5.353 | <0.001*** | 0.993*** |
A6 | 105.444 | 29.975 | <0.001*** | 0.996*** |
W6 | 42.972 | 6.527 | <0.001*** | 0.983*** |
编号Number | 面积S | 决定系数R2 | 最大残差平方和SSEmax | 面积绝对差 |
---|---|---|---|---|
N1 | 727.402 | 0.997 | 8.598 | 115.159 |
N2 | 683.263 | 0.996 | 9.055 | 71.019 |
N3 | 544.102 | 0.994 | 8.609 | 68.142 |
N4 | 641.791 | 0.994 | 10.048 | 29.547 |
N5 | 725.744 | 0.995 | 11.630 | 113.501 |
N6 | 799.352 | 0.988 | 33.832 | 187.109 |
N7 | 616.048 | 0.992 | 11.076 | 3.805 |
N8 | 550.691 | 0.990 | 9.936 | 61.553 |
N9 | 525.044 | 0.989 | 9.574 | 87.200 |
N10 | 608.684 | 0.995 | 7.974 | 3.560 |
N11 | 543.080 | 0.995 | 5.714 | 69.163 |
N12 | 667.199 | 0.995 | 10.071 | 54.956 |
N13 | 702.717 | 0.995 | 9.734 | 90.474 |
N14 | 656.773 | 0.992 | 13.350 | 44.530 |
N15 | 615.179 | 0.995 | 7.424 | 2.936 |
N16 | 673.215 | 0.989 | 19.837 | 60.972 |
N17 | 590.151 | 0.993 | 7.214 | 22.093 |
N18 | 588.561 | 0.990 | 7.327 | 23.683 |
N19 | 838.599 | 0.985 | 7.395 | 226.355 |
N20 | 640.910 | 0.992 | 12.561 | 28.666 |
Table 2 Analysis of temperature monitoring points in seedling period
编号Number | 面积S | 决定系数R2 | 最大残差平方和SSEmax | 面积绝对差 |
---|---|---|---|---|
N1 | 727.402 | 0.997 | 8.598 | 115.159 |
N2 | 683.263 | 0.996 | 9.055 | 71.019 |
N3 | 544.102 | 0.994 | 8.609 | 68.142 |
N4 | 641.791 | 0.994 | 10.048 | 29.547 |
N5 | 725.744 | 0.995 | 11.630 | 113.501 |
N6 | 799.352 | 0.988 | 33.832 | 187.109 |
N7 | 616.048 | 0.992 | 11.076 | 3.805 |
N8 | 550.691 | 0.990 | 9.936 | 61.553 |
N9 | 525.044 | 0.989 | 9.574 | 87.200 |
N10 | 608.684 | 0.995 | 7.974 | 3.560 |
N11 | 543.080 | 0.995 | 5.714 | 69.163 |
N12 | 667.199 | 0.995 | 10.071 | 54.956 |
N13 | 702.717 | 0.995 | 9.734 | 90.474 |
N14 | 656.773 | 0.992 | 13.350 | 44.530 |
N15 | 615.179 | 0.995 | 7.424 | 2.936 |
N16 | 673.215 | 0.989 | 19.837 | 60.972 |
N17 | 590.151 | 0.993 | 7.214 | 22.093 |
N18 | 588.561 | 0.990 | 7.327 | 23.683 |
N19 | 838.599 | 0.985 | 7.395 | 226.355 |
N20 | 640.910 | 0.992 | 12.561 | 28.666 |
编号Number | 面积S | 决定系数R2 | 最大残差平方和SSEmax | 面积绝对差 |
---|---|---|---|---|
N1 | 1 248.018 | 0.994 | 22.318 | 51.999 |
N2 | 1 054.503 | 0.995 | 18.199 | 141.516 |
N3 | 933.838 | 0.997 | 7.431 | 262.181 |
N4 | 1 298.808 | 0.995 | 17.050 | 102.789 |
N5 | 975.805 | 0.997 | 17.562 | 220.214 |
N6 | 1 347.933 | 0.994 | 21.070 | 151.914 |
N7 | 1 060.641 | 0.996 | 19.455 | 135.378 |
N8 | 1 037.902 | 0.993 | 15.896 | 158.117 |
N9 | 1 122.535 | 0.993 | 16.110 | 73.484 |
N10 | 1 209.888 | 0.994 | 19.456 | 13.869 |
N11 | 1 230.460 | 0.994 | 14.158 | 34.441 |
N12 | 1 312.735 | 0.996 | 19.258 | 116.716 |
N13 | 1 344.941 | 0.994 | 14.682 | 148.921 |
N14 | 1 331.852 | 0.997 | 13.724 | 135.833 |
N15 | 1 195.037 | 0.997 | 10.142 | 0.982 |
N16 | 1 325.261 | 0.996 | 15.528 | 129.242 |
N17 | 1 116.874 | 0.992 | 16.555 | 79.145 |
N18 | 1 120.108 | 0.996 | 9.720 | 75.911 |
N19 | 1 104.571 | 0.996 | 11.020 | 91.448 |
N20 | 1 241.593 | 0.996 | 16.521 | 45.575 |
Table 3 Analysis of temperature monitoring points during flowering and fruit-setting period
编号Number | 面积S | 决定系数R2 | 最大残差平方和SSEmax | 面积绝对差 |
---|---|---|---|---|
N1 | 1 248.018 | 0.994 | 22.318 | 51.999 |
N2 | 1 054.503 | 0.995 | 18.199 | 141.516 |
N3 | 933.838 | 0.997 | 7.431 | 262.181 |
N4 | 1 298.808 | 0.995 | 17.050 | 102.789 |
N5 | 975.805 | 0.997 | 17.562 | 220.214 |
N6 | 1 347.933 | 0.994 | 21.070 | 151.914 |
N7 | 1 060.641 | 0.996 | 19.455 | 135.378 |
N8 | 1 037.902 | 0.993 | 15.896 | 158.117 |
N9 | 1 122.535 | 0.993 | 16.110 | 73.484 |
N10 | 1 209.888 | 0.994 | 19.456 | 13.869 |
N11 | 1 230.460 | 0.994 | 14.158 | 34.441 |
N12 | 1 312.735 | 0.996 | 19.258 | 116.716 |
N13 | 1 344.941 | 0.994 | 14.682 | 148.921 |
N14 | 1 331.852 | 0.997 | 13.724 | 135.833 |
N15 | 1 195.037 | 0.997 | 10.142 | 0.982 |
N16 | 1 325.261 | 0.996 | 15.528 | 129.242 |
N17 | 1 116.874 | 0.992 | 16.555 | 79.145 |
N18 | 1 120.108 | 0.996 | 9.720 | 75.911 |
N19 | 1 104.571 | 0.996 | 11.020 | 91.448 |
N20 | 1 241.593 | 0.996 | 16.521 | 45.575 |
编号Number | 面积S | 决定系数R2 | 最大残差平方和SSEmax | 面积绝对差 |
---|---|---|---|---|
N1 | 475.692 | 0.950 | 75.134 | 138.328 |
N2 | 476.545 | 0.962 | 82.435 | 137.476 |
N3 | 524.669 | 0.978 | 36.277 | 89.352 |
N4 | 907.467 | 0.987 | 22.413 | 293.446 |
N5 | 845.389 | 0.997 | 5.476 | 231.369 |
N6 | 1 089.876 | 0.997 | 7.109 | 475.856 |
N7 | 310.710 | 0.951 | 92.737 | 303.311 |
N8 | 980.921 | 0.993 | 13.506 | 366.901 |
N9 | 868.557 | 0.995 | 11.550 | 254.537 |
N10 | 660.607 | 0.981 | 45.321 | 46.586 1 |
N11 | 878.264 | 0.995 | 9.142 | 264.243 |
N12 | 411.155 | 0.977 | 39.670 | 202.866 |
N13 | 476.474 | 0.975 | 24.590 | 137.547 |
N14 | 1 031.656 | 0.989 | 24.649 | 417.636 |
N15 | 492.496 | 0.990 | 11.890 | 121.524 |
N16 | 855.332 | 0.982 | 30.418 | 241.311 |
N17 | 360.998 | 0.986 | 8.831 | 253.022 |
N18 | 818.191 | 0.996 | 8.547 | 204.171 |
N19 | 727.926 | 0.994 | 16.132 | 113.905 |
N20 | 352.663 | 0.919 | 119.734 | 261.358 |
Table 4 Analysis of temperature monitoring points in fruiting period
编号Number | 面积S | 决定系数R2 | 最大残差平方和SSEmax | 面积绝对差 |
---|---|---|---|---|
N1 | 475.692 | 0.950 | 75.134 | 138.328 |
N2 | 476.545 | 0.962 | 82.435 | 137.476 |
N3 | 524.669 | 0.978 | 36.277 | 89.352 |
N4 | 907.467 | 0.987 | 22.413 | 293.446 |
N5 | 845.389 | 0.997 | 5.476 | 231.369 |
N6 | 1 089.876 | 0.997 | 7.109 | 475.856 |
N7 | 310.710 | 0.951 | 92.737 | 303.311 |
N8 | 980.921 | 0.993 | 13.506 | 366.901 |
N9 | 868.557 | 0.995 | 11.550 | 254.537 |
N10 | 660.607 | 0.981 | 45.321 | 46.586 1 |
N11 | 878.264 | 0.995 | 9.142 | 264.243 |
N12 | 411.155 | 0.977 | 39.670 | 202.866 |
N13 | 476.474 | 0.975 | 24.590 | 137.547 |
N14 | 1 031.656 | 0.989 | 24.649 | 417.636 |
N15 | 492.496 | 0.990 | 11.890 | 121.524 |
N16 | 855.332 | 0.982 | 30.418 | 241.311 |
N17 | 360.998 | 0.986 | 8.831 | 253.022 |
N18 | 818.191 | 0.996 | 8.547 | 204.171 |
N19 | 727.926 | 0.994 | 16.132 | 113.905 |
N20 | 352.663 | 0.919 | 119.734 | 261.358 |
时期Period | 时间Time | N10 | N11 | N3 | N13 | N5 | N15 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
苗期 Seeding period | 8∶00 | 18.97 | 18.84 | 17.72 | 18.64 | 18.87 | 18.72 |
12∶00 | 27.12 | 25.76 | 26.16 | 28.09 | 28.64 | 26.77 | |
14∶00 | 28.66 | 28.18 | 28.84 | 30.03 | 30.39 | 28.81 | |
20∶00 | 21.19 | 21.34 | 20.92 | 21.10 | 20.08 | 21.32 | |
开花坐果期 Flowering and fruit-setting period | 8∶00 | 15.79 | 15.72 | 15.30 | 15.62 | 16.10 | 15.62 |
12∶00 | 31.90 | 27.72 | 25.88 | 29.59 | 35.22 | 30.80 | |
14∶00 | 27.56 | 27.15 | 25.70 | 27.46 | 29.84 | 28.32 | |
20∶00 | 18.39 | 18.44 | 18.70 | 18.73 | 18.65 | 18.41 | |
结果期 Fruiting period | 8∶00 | 8.86 | 8.88 | 8.56 | 9.06 | 8.76 | 8.60 |
12∶00 | 28.69 | 34.34 | 27.55 | 28.96 | 32.80 | 29.64 | |
14∶00 | 34.98 | 35.23 | 30.57 | 30.64 | 35.06 | 32.96 | |
20∶00 | 15.25 | 15.05 | 14.48 | 15.24 | 15.08 | 15.03 |
Table 5 Measured data from symmetrical monitoring sites
时期Period | 时间Time | N10 | N11 | N3 | N13 | N5 | N15 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
苗期 Seeding period | 8∶00 | 18.97 | 18.84 | 17.72 | 18.64 | 18.87 | 18.72 |
12∶00 | 27.12 | 25.76 | 26.16 | 28.09 | 28.64 | 26.77 | |
14∶00 | 28.66 | 28.18 | 28.84 | 30.03 | 30.39 | 28.81 | |
20∶00 | 21.19 | 21.34 | 20.92 | 21.10 | 20.08 | 21.32 | |
开花坐果期 Flowering and fruit-setting period | 8∶00 | 15.79 | 15.72 | 15.30 | 15.62 | 16.10 | 15.62 |
12∶00 | 31.90 | 27.72 | 25.88 | 29.59 | 35.22 | 30.80 | |
14∶00 | 27.56 | 27.15 | 25.70 | 27.46 | 29.84 | 28.32 | |
20∶00 | 18.39 | 18.44 | 18.70 | 18.73 | 18.65 | 18.41 | |
结果期 Fruiting period | 8∶00 | 8.86 | 8.88 | 8.56 | 9.06 | 8.76 | 8.60 |
12∶00 | 28.69 | 34.34 | 27.55 | 28.96 | 32.80 | 29.64 | |
14∶00 | 34.98 | 35.23 | 30.57 | 30.64 | 35.06 | 32.96 | |
20∶00 | 15.25 | 15.05 | 14.48 | 15.24 | 15.08 | 15.03 |
时期Period | 时间Time | 平均值Average value | N10 | N1 | N9 | N19 | N20 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
苗期 Seeding period | 8∶00 | 18.88 | 18.97 | 19.08 | 19.14 | 18.72 | 19.09 |
12∶00 | 26.80 | 27.12 | 27.91 | 26.16 | 25.24 | 27.84 | |
14∶00 | 28.55 | 28.66 | 30.07 | 27.59 | 26.58 | 28.08 | |
20∶00 | 21.45 | 21.19 | 21.09 | 21.93 | 22.11 | 21.53 | |
开花坐果期 Flowering and fruit bearing period | 8∶00 | 15.73 | 15.79 | 16.18 | 15.43 | 15.23 | 15.68 |
12∶00 | 31.16 | 31.90 | 34.05 | 31.34 | 28.91 | 34.16 | |
14∶00 | 28.03 | 27.56 | 29.40 | 27.15 | 27.42 | 29.40 | |
20∶00 | 18.68 | 18.39 | 18.84 | 18.86 | 18.64 | 18.88 | |
结果期 Fruiting period | 8∶00 | 8.74 | 8.86 | 8.94 | 8.83 | 8.80 | 8.06 |
12∶00 | 30.01 | 28.69 | 25.66 | 34.11 | 34.43 | 26.61 | |
14∶00 | 33.40 | 34.98 | 29.06 | 35.71 | 36.69 | 31.36 | |
20∶00 | 15.00 | 15.25 | 15.12 | 15.21 | 15.14 | 14.34 |
Table 6 Measured data of greenhouse temperature monitoring points
时期Period | 时间Time | 平均值Average value | N10 | N1 | N9 | N19 | N20 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
苗期 Seeding period | 8∶00 | 18.88 | 18.97 | 19.08 | 19.14 | 18.72 | 19.09 |
12∶00 | 26.80 | 27.12 | 27.91 | 26.16 | 25.24 | 27.84 | |
14∶00 | 28.55 | 28.66 | 30.07 | 27.59 | 26.58 | 28.08 | |
20∶00 | 21.45 | 21.19 | 21.09 | 21.93 | 22.11 | 21.53 | |
开花坐果期 Flowering and fruit bearing period | 8∶00 | 15.73 | 15.79 | 16.18 | 15.43 | 15.23 | 15.68 |
12∶00 | 31.16 | 31.90 | 34.05 | 31.34 | 28.91 | 34.16 | |
14∶00 | 28.03 | 27.56 | 29.40 | 27.15 | 27.42 | 29.40 | |
20∶00 | 18.68 | 18.39 | 18.84 | 18.86 | 18.64 | 18.88 | |
结果期 Fruiting period | 8∶00 | 8.74 | 8.86 | 8.94 | 8.83 | 8.80 | 8.06 |
12∶00 | 30.01 | 28.69 | 25.66 | 34.11 | 34.43 | 26.61 | |
14∶00 | 33.40 | 34.98 | 29.06 | 35.71 | 36.69 | 31.36 | |
20∶00 | 15.00 | 15.25 | 15.12 | 15.21 | 15.14 | 14.34 |
1 | 葛文杰,赵春江.农业物联网研究与应用现状及发展对策研究[J].农业机械学报,2014,45(7):222-230, 277. |
GE W J, ZHAO C J. State-of-the-art and developing strategies of agricultural internet of things [J]. Trans. Chin. Soc. Agric. Mach.,2014, 45 (7): 222-230, 277. | |
2 | 柳平增,孟祥伟,田盼,等.基于物联网的精准农业信息感知系统设计[J].计算机工程与科学,2012,34 (3): 137-141. |
LIU P Z, MENG X W, TIAN P, et al.. Design of a precision agriculture information perception system based on the internet of things [J]. Computer. Eng. Sci., 2012,34 (3): 137-141. | |
3 | 雷钧, 殷国鑫.基于太阳能的大棚温控系统设计与试验[J].农机化研究, 2021, 43 (6): 210-213, 218. |
LEI J, YIN G X. Design and experiment of greenhouse temperature control system based on solar energy [J]. J. Agric. Mechan. Res., 2021, 43 (6): 210-213, 218. | |
4 | 张猛, 房俊龙, 韩雨.基于ZigBee和Internet的温室群环境远程监控系统设计[J].农业工程学报, 2013, 29 (S1): 171-176. |
ZHANG M, FANG J L, HAN Y. Design on remote monitoring and control system for greenhouse group based on ZigBee and Internet [J]. Trans. Chin. Soc. Agric. Eng., 2013, 29 (S1): 171-176. | |
5 | WU Y, LI L, LI M, et al.. Remote control system for greenhouse based on open source hardware [J]. IFAC PapersOnLine, 2019, 52 (30):173-183. |
6 | 宗哲英.温室群环境参数监测系统与参数时空分布规律研究[D]. 呼和浩特:内蒙古农业大学,2018. |
ZONG Z Y. Study on monitoring system of greenhouse group and the spatial and temporal distribution of the environmental parameters [D]. Hohhot: Inner Mongolia Agricultural University, 2018. | |
7 | 赵建贵,李志伟,王文俊,等.日光温室番茄种植环境参数时空分布测试与分析[J].山西农业科学,2019,47 (12): 2172-2176, 2181. |
ZHAO J G, LI Z W, WANG W J, et al.. Spatial and temporal distribution test and analysis of tomato planting environment parameters in solar greenhouse [J]. J. Shanxi Agric. Sci., 2019, 47 (12) : 2172-2176, 2181. | |
8 | 康宏源,塔娜,张海鑫,等.典型天气情况下含内拱棚的日光温室温湿度分析与稳态模拟[J].江苏农业科学, 2019, 47 (2): 215-220. |
KANG H Y, TA N, ZHANG H X, et al.. Temperature and humidity analysis and steady state simulation of solar greenhouse with inner arch shed under typical weather conditions [J]. Jiangsu Agric. Sci., 2019, 47 (2): 215-220. | |
9 | 塔娜,张驰,朱英开,等.温室内温度无线测试系统及温度场模拟[J].东北农业大学学报,2014, 45 (2): 111-115. |
TA N, ZHANG C, ZHU Y K, et al.. Wire-less temperature value measuring system and distribution simulation [J]. J. Northeast Agric. Univ., 2014, 45 (2): 111-115. | |
10 | 侯加林,蒲文洋,李天华,等.基于UWB与物联网的移动式温室环境监测系统设计与实现[J].农业工程学报, 2020, 36 (23): 229-240. |
HOU J L, PU W Y, LI T H, et al.. Design and implementation of mobile greenhouse environmental monitoring system based on UWB and internet of things [J]. Trans. Chin. Soc. Agric. Eng., 2020,36 (23): 229-240. | |
11 | 彭秀媛, 白冰, 王枫, 等.日光温室内环境科学数据监测传感器的布设[J].江苏农业科学, 2017, 45 (10): 167-170. |
PENG X Y, BAI B, WANG F, et al.. Layout of environmental science data monitoring sensor in solar greenhouse [J]. Jiangsu Agric. Sci., 2017,45 (10): 167-170. | |
12 | 许可, 冯丹, 王枫, 等.基于数据融合的日光温室传感器布设[J].沈阳工业大学学报, 2019, 41 (1): 91-97. |
XU K, FENG D, WANG F, et al.. Layout of sensors in sunlight greenhouse based on data fusion [J]. J. Shenyang Univ. Tech., 2019,41 (1): 91-97. | |
13 | 王凡, 黄磊, 吴素萍, 等. 多路数据采集与处理模型的设计及水分传感器埋设位置优化[J].农业工程学报, 2015, 31 (21): 148-153. |
WANG F, HUANG L, WU S P, et al.. Design of multi-channel data acquisition and processing model and optimization of moisture sensor buried position [J]. Trans. Chin. Soc. Agric. Eng., 2015, 31 (21): 148-153. | |
14 | LEE S Y, LEE I B, HYEO U, et al.. Optimal sensor placement for monitoring and controlling greenhouse internal environments [J]. Bios. Eng., 2019, 188 (11):190-206. |
15 | TAJNAFOI G, ARCUCCI R, MOTTET L, et al.. Variational gaussian process for optimal sensor placement [J]. Appl. Math., 2021,66 (2):287-317. |
16 | ROMAIN P, SAMIR B, JULIEN D. Robust flow control and optimal sensor placement using deep reinforcement learning [J/OL]. J. Fluid Mech., 2021, 913 (1): A425 [2022-11-02]. . |
17 | CUMBO R, MAZZANTI L, TAMAROZZI T,et al.. Advanced optimal sensor placement for kalman-based multiple-input estimation [J/OL]. Mech. Syst Signal Proc., 2021, 160 (3):107830 [2022-11-02]. . |
18 | 张传帅, 徐岚俊, 李小龙, 等. 日光温室主要环境参数对番茄本体长势的影响[J].中国农业大学学报, 2019, 24(10):118-124. |
ZHANG C S, XU L J, LI X L, et al.. Effects of main environmental parameters on the growth of tomato in solar greenhouse [J]. J. Chin. Agric. Univ., 2019, 24 (10):118-124. | |
19 | 塔娜, 五十六, 马文娟, 等.不同含水率下日光温室土壤温度变化规律的峰拟合法拟合[J].农业工程学报,2014 (20): 204-210. |
TA N, WU S L, MA W J, et al.. Peak-fitting based prediction of soil temperature according to soil moisture content in solar greenhouse [J]. Trans. Chin. Soc. Agric. Eng., 2014 (20): 204-210. | |
20 | 李原鹰, 徐德刚, 桂卫华, 等.基于拉曼光谱高斯分峰拟合的硫化锑含量检测方法[J].光谱学与光谱分析, 2017, 37 (12):3743-3748. |
LI Y Y, XU D G, GUI W H, et al.. A novel method for measuring antimony sulfide content based on gaussian-peak fitting of Raman spectroscopy [J]. Spectrosc. Spect. Anal., 2017, 37 (12):3743-3748. | |
21 | 赵凯. 温室智能控制中多传感器信息融合算法的研究[D].西安:西安科技大学,2020. |
ZHAO K. Research on multi-sensor information fusion algorithm in greenhouse intelligent control [D]. Xi’an: Xi’an University of Science and Technology, 2020. |
[1] | Baoshi LI, Wenke LIU, Qi WANG, Mingjie SHAO. Effect of Soil-ridged Substrate-embedded Cultivation on Root Zone Temperature, Growth and Yield of Cucumber in Chinese Solar Greenhouse in Summer [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2022, 24(2): 177-183. |
[2] | LI Baoshi, LIU Wenke, WANG Qi, ZHA Lingyan, ZHANG Yubin, ZHOU Chengbo, SHAO Mingjie. Influences of DMPP on the Cucumber Yield and Root Zone Greenhouse Gas Emission under Different Cultivation Methods [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2021, 23(9): 184-192. |
[3] | LIU Huan, YANG Yanjie, SHI Yuliang, LI Min, XING Manman. Analysis and Prediction on the Annual Temperature and Humidity Change of Solar Greenhouse in Jiaodong Area [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2021, 23(12): 136-144. |
[4] | YANG Jiajia1, LIU Yifei1*, LIU Wenke1,2*. Effects of Straw Fermentation in Furrow Soil on Root Zone Temperature, CO2 Release and Tomato Growth Cultivated by Soil-ridged and Substrate-embedded Cultivation Method [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2020, 22(12): 137-145. |
[5] | LIU Zhongliang1, GU Duanyin1, ZHANG Yanyan1, JIAO Juan1, GAO Junjie1*, LIU Shiqi2, TIAN Xiaofei3. Influences of Water-saving and Nitrogen-reducing on Quality, Yield and Water-Nitrogen Use Efficiency of Protected Tomato [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2019, 21(2): 111-119. |
[6] | LI Zonggeng, FU Guohai, LIU Wenke*. Diurnal Temperature Changes of Root Zone and Lateral Side of Four Soil-Ridged Substrate-Embedded Cultivation Ridges Planted Sweet Pepper in Chinese Solar Greenhouse [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2018, 20(2): 108-115. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||