中国农业科技导报 ›› 2022, Vol. 24 ›› Issue (2): 201-209.DOI: 10.13304/j.nykjdb.2020.0844
陈昌婕1(), 马琳1, 苗玉焕1, 郭兰萍2, 刘大会1(
)
收稿日期:
2020-10-19
接受日期:
2020-12-03
出版日期:
2022-02-15
发布日期:
2022-02-22
通讯作者:
刘大会
作者简介:
陈昌婕 E-mail:1051570116@qq.com;
基金资助:
Changjie CHEN1(), Lin MA1, Yuhuan MIAO1, Lanping GUO2, Dahui LIU1(
)
Received:
2020-10-19
Accepted:
2020-12-03
Online:
2022-02-15
Published:
2022-02-22
Contact:
Dahui LIU
摘要:
为明确钾肥施用量对蕲春县蕲艾产量和品质的影响,设置0(K0)、60(K60)、120(K120)、180(K180)和240 kg·hm-2(K240) 5个施钾处理,采用2年田间试验研究了不同施钾量对蕲艾农艺性状、药材产量、叶片出绒率、叶片中总挥发油和7种挥发性成分含量、总黄酮和9种黄酮、酚酸类成分含量以及矿质元素含量的影响。结果表明,施用钾肥能促进蕲艾的生长发育,显著提高艾叶产量。与K0处理相比,K180处理的产量在2018和2019年分别增长了47.2%和53.6%;施用钾肥后蕲艾出绒率分别提高了1.3%~23.1%(2018)和11.1%~40.6%(2019);随着钾肥施用量的增加,艾叶中总挥发油、桉油精、樟脑、龙脑、α-石竹烯、总黄酮、异绿原酸A、棕矢车菊素、异泽兰黄素含量呈降低趋势。相关分析表明,艾叶的产量和出绒率与叶片中K、Ca、Mg、Fe、Zn元素含量呈显著正相关;而叶片中有效成分含量与K、Ca、Mg、Fe、Zn元素含量呈显著负相关。综合考虑蕲艾产量、出绒率、挥发油、黄酮和酚酸成分含量等因素,在蕲春县蕲艾种植生产中,钾肥推荐施用量为120~180 kg·hm-2,为蕲艾规范化种植、科学施用钾肥提供了理论依据。
中图分类号:
陈昌婕, 马琳, 苗玉焕, 郭兰萍, 刘大会. 施用钾肥对蕲春蕲艾产量、出绒率及品质的影响[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2022, 24(2): 201-209.
Changjie CHEN, Lin MA, Yuhuan MIAO, Lanping GUO, Dahui LIU. Effects of Potassium Application on Growth, Yield and Quality of Artemisia argyi[J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2022, 24(2): 201-209.
年份 Year | 处理 Treatment | 密度 Density/ (plant·m-2) | 株高 Plant height/ cm | 茎粗 Stem diameter/mm | 叶片数 Leaf number per plant | 叶宽 Blade width/ cm | 叶长 Blade length/ cm | 枯叶高 Dead leaf height/cm | 叶片产量 Leaf yield/ (kg·hm-2) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2018 | K0 | 80.63±5.10 b | 173.91±5.92 a | 7.43±0.59 a | 22.13±2.72 a | 9.22±1.21 a | 9.80±0.83 a | 58.11±5.23 a | 4 974.71±235.20 c |
K60 | 93.13±9.59 b | 169.63±4.67 a | 7.48±0.12 a | 22.21±2.63 a | 9.67±0.79 a | 10.52±0.60 a | 63.54±7.02 a | 5 300.98±352.23 c | |
K120 | 110.31±9.19 ab | 174.10±9.33 a | 7.56±0.53 a | 22.01±1.98 a | 9.42±0.64 a | 9.46±0.71 a | 59.02±3.80 a | 6 653.52±400.93 b | |
K180 | 123.33±8.33 a | 170.92±1.52 a | 7.74±0.27 a | 24.27±3.02 a | 9.86±0.75 a | 10.23±0.92 a | 65.37±6.68 a | 7 324.03±595.08 a | |
K240 | 114.17±11.59 ab | 170.41±8.01 a | 7.87±0.24 a | 25.09±2.99 a | 10.51±0.93 a | 11.32±1.27 a | 66.13±4.33 a | 7 157.32±521.98 a | |
2019 | K0 | 85.42±7.12 c | 138.77±10.87 a | 5.12±0.26 a | 16.12±1.69 a | 8.93±0.92 a | 9.93±0.68 a | 77.40±10.63 a | 4035.50±339.17 c |
K60 | 117.97±12.44 b | 138.23±7.32 a | 4.88±0.58 a | 17.00±2.26 a | 8.30±0.40 a | 9.50±0.24 b | 75.13±2.58 a | 4608.31±559.32 c | |
K120 | 134.49±2.94 a | 140.73±8.50 a | 5.20±0.89 a | 17.24±1.82 a | 8.01±0.33 b | 9.29±0.58 b | 78.30±7.83 a | 5548.39±452.35 b | |
K180 | 137.50±13.12 a | 145.25±2.64 a | 5.22±0.35 a | 18.34±1.68 a | 8.24±0.52 b | 9.61±0.50 b | 82.43±4.56 a | 6198.62±208.91 a | |
K240 | 132.81±9.89 a | 141.21±4.31 a | 5.24±0.11 a | 18.71±1.02 a | 9.32±0.70 a | 10.69±0.72 a | 80.01±2.42 a | 5788.58±433.30 ab |
表1 不同施钾量下蕲艾的农艺性状及叶片产量
Table 1 Agronomic traits and leaf yield of Artemisiaargyi under different K application rates
年份 Year | 处理 Treatment | 密度 Density/ (plant·m-2) | 株高 Plant height/ cm | 茎粗 Stem diameter/mm | 叶片数 Leaf number per plant | 叶宽 Blade width/ cm | 叶长 Blade length/ cm | 枯叶高 Dead leaf height/cm | 叶片产量 Leaf yield/ (kg·hm-2) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2018 | K0 | 80.63±5.10 b | 173.91±5.92 a | 7.43±0.59 a | 22.13±2.72 a | 9.22±1.21 a | 9.80±0.83 a | 58.11±5.23 a | 4 974.71±235.20 c |
K60 | 93.13±9.59 b | 169.63±4.67 a | 7.48±0.12 a | 22.21±2.63 a | 9.67±0.79 a | 10.52±0.60 a | 63.54±7.02 a | 5 300.98±352.23 c | |
K120 | 110.31±9.19 ab | 174.10±9.33 a | 7.56±0.53 a | 22.01±1.98 a | 9.42±0.64 a | 9.46±0.71 a | 59.02±3.80 a | 6 653.52±400.93 b | |
K180 | 123.33±8.33 a | 170.92±1.52 a | 7.74±0.27 a | 24.27±3.02 a | 9.86±0.75 a | 10.23±0.92 a | 65.37±6.68 a | 7 324.03±595.08 a | |
K240 | 114.17±11.59 ab | 170.41±8.01 a | 7.87±0.24 a | 25.09±2.99 a | 10.51±0.93 a | 11.32±1.27 a | 66.13±4.33 a | 7 157.32±521.98 a | |
2019 | K0 | 85.42±7.12 c | 138.77±10.87 a | 5.12±0.26 a | 16.12±1.69 a | 8.93±0.92 a | 9.93±0.68 a | 77.40±10.63 a | 4035.50±339.17 c |
K60 | 117.97±12.44 b | 138.23±7.32 a | 4.88±0.58 a | 17.00±2.26 a | 8.30±0.40 a | 9.50±0.24 b | 75.13±2.58 a | 4608.31±559.32 c | |
K120 | 134.49±2.94 a | 140.73±8.50 a | 5.20±0.89 a | 17.24±1.82 a | 8.01±0.33 b | 9.29±0.58 b | 78.30±7.83 a | 5548.39±452.35 b | |
K180 | 137.50±13.12 a | 145.25±2.64 a | 5.22±0.35 a | 18.34±1.68 a | 8.24±0.52 b | 9.61±0.50 b | 82.43±4.56 a | 6198.62±208.91 a | |
K240 | 132.81±9.89 a | 141.21±4.31 a | 5.24±0.11 a | 18.71±1.02 a | 9.32±0.70 a | 10.69±0.72 a | 80.01±2.42 a | 5788.58±433.30 ab |
图1 不同施钾量下蕲艾叶片出绒率注:不同小写字母表示同年不同处理间差异在P<0.05水平显著。
Fig.1 Output rates of moxa in the leaves of Artemisia argyi under different K application ratesNote:Different lowercase letters indicate significant differences between different treatments in same year at P<0.05 level.
年份 Year | 处理 Treatment | 总挥发油 Total volatile oil/% | 桉油精 Eucalyptusoleoresin/(mg·g-1) | α-侧柏酮 α-thujone/ (mg·g-1) | 樟脑 Camphor/ (mg·g-1) | 龙脑 Borneol/ (mg·g-1) | α-石竹烯 α-caryophyllene/(mg·g-1) | β-丁香烯 β-butene/ (mg·g-1) | 石竹素 Caryophyllin/ (mg·g-1) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2018 | K0 | 1.21±0.13 a | 1.12±0.17 a | 3.71±0.41 a | 0.37±0.04 a | 0.18±0.04 a | 0.29±0.02 a | 0.36±0.04 a | 0.57±0.08 a |
K60 | 1.18±0.09 a | 0.94±0.19 ab | 4.23±0.39 a | 0.26±0.09 a | 0.17±0.01 a | 0.26±0.03 a | 0.24±0.02 a | 0.67±0.10 a | |
K120 | 1.13±0.11 ab | 0.88±0.06 b | 3.66±0.64 a | 0.13±0.04 b | 0.17±0.02 a | 0.24±0.01 a | 0.31±0.05 a | 0.66±0.07 a | |
K180 | 1.12±0.04 ab | 0.16±0.04 c | 4.39±0.50 a | 0.11±0.02 b | 0.02±0.00 b | 0.20±0.00 b | 0.31±0.03 a | 0.51±0.06 a | |
K240 | 1.03±0.07 b | 0.11±0.03 c | 4.22±0.36 a | 0.10±0.04 b | 0.02±0.00 b | 0.19±0.02 b | 0.29±0.04 a | 0.70±0.08 a | |
2019 | K0 | 1.07±0.11 a | 1.18±0.19 a | 5.30±0.48 a | 0.57±0.07 a | 0.23±0.05 a | 0.31±0.05 a | 0.61±0.07 a | 0.50±0.06 a |
K60 | 1.01±0.08 a | 0.81±0.15 ab | 5.22±0.17 a | 0.42±0.06 b | 0.21±0.04 a | 0.26±0.03 a | 0.54±0.04 a | 0.49±0.04 a | |
K120 | 0.98±0.10 ab | 0.78±0.12 b | 5.16±0.69 a | 0.42±0.05 b | 0.18±0.01 a | 0.22±0.04 a | 0.41±0.08 a | 0.49±0.06 a | |
K180 | 0.95±0.09 ab | 0.39±0.09 c | 5.35±0.68 a | 0.41±0.02 b | 0.04±0.00 b | 0.18±0.03 a | 0.39±0.04 a | 0.49±0.09 a | |
K240 | 0.92±0.08 b | 0.15±0.03 d | 4.84±0.53 a | 0.35±0.06 b | 0.03±0.00 b | 0.23±0.03 a | 0.52±0.03 a | 0.55±0.03 a |
表2 不同施钾量下蕲艾叶片中总挥发油及挥发性组分的含量
Table 2 Contents of total volatile oil and seven volatile components in the leaves of Artemisiaargyi under different K application rate
年份 Year | 处理 Treatment | 总挥发油 Total volatile oil/% | 桉油精 Eucalyptusoleoresin/(mg·g-1) | α-侧柏酮 α-thujone/ (mg·g-1) | 樟脑 Camphor/ (mg·g-1) | 龙脑 Borneol/ (mg·g-1) | α-石竹烯 α-caryophyllene/(mg·g-1) | β-丁香烯 β-butene/ (mg·g-1) | 石竹素 Caryophyllin/ (mg·g-1) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2018 | K0 | 1.21±0.13 a | 1.12±0.17 a | 3.71±0.41 a | 0.37±0.04 a | 0.18±0.04 a | 0.29±0.02 a | 0.36±0.04 a | 0.57±0.08 a |
K60 | 1.18±0.09 a | 0.94±0.19 ab | 4.23±0.39 a | 0.26±0.09 a | 0.17±0.01 a | 0.26±0.03 a | 0.24±0.02 a | 0.67±0.10 a | |
K120 | 1.13±0.11 ab | 0.88±0.06 b | 3.66±0.64 a | 0.13±0.04 b | 0.17±0.02 a | 0.24±0.01 a | 0.31±0.05 a | 0.66±0.07 a | |
K180 | 1.12±0.04 ab | 0.16±0.04 c | 4.39±0.50 a | 0.11±0.02 b | 0.02±0.00 b | 0.20±0.00 b | 0.31±0.03 a | 0.51±0.06 a | |
K240 | 1.03±0.07 b | 0.11±0.03 c | 4.22±0.36 a | 0.10±0.04 b | 0.02±0.00 b | 0.19±0.02 b | 0.29±0.04 a | 0.70±0.08 a | |
2019 | K0 | 1.07±0.11 a | 1.18±0.19 a | 5.30±0.48 a | 0.57±0.07 a | 0.23±0.05 a | 0.31±0.05 a | 0.61±0.07 a | 0.50±0.06 a |
K60 | 1.01±0.08 a | 0.81±0.15 ab | 5.22±0.17 a | 0.42±0.06 b | 0.21±0.04 a | 0.26±0.03 a | 0.54±0.04 a | 0.49±0.04 a | |
K120 | 0.98±0.10 ab | 0.78±0.12 b | 5.16±0.69 a | 0.42±0.05 b | 0.18±0.01 a | 0.22±0.04 a | 0.41±0.08 a | 0.49±0.06 a | |
K180 | 0.95±0.09 ab | 0.39±0.09 c | 5.35±0.68 a | 0.41±0.02 b | 0.04±0.00 b | 0.18±0.03 a | 0.39±0.04 a | 0.49±0.09 a | |
K240 | 0.92±0.08 b | 0.15±0.03 d | 4.84±0.53 a | 0.35±0.06 b | 0.03±0.00 b | 0.23±0.03 a | 0.52±0.03 a | 0.55±0.03 a |
年份 Year | 处理 Treatment | 总黄酮 Total flavonoids/% | 新绿原酸 Neochlorogenic acid/(mg·g-1) | 绿原酸 Chlorogenic acid/(mg·g-1) | 隐绿原酸 Cryptochlorogenic acid/(mg·g-1) | 异绿原酸B Isochlorogenic acid B/(mg·g-1) | 异绿原酸A Isochlorogenic acid A/(mg·g-1) | 异绿原酸C Isochlorogenic acid C/(mg·g-1) | 山奈酚 Keampferol/(mg·g-1) | 棕矢车菊素 Jeceosidin/(mg·g-1) | 异泽兰黄素 Eupatilin/ (mg·g-1) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2018 | K0 | 2.85±0.15 ab | 0.12±0.01 a | 0.42±0.03 a | 0.18±0.01 a | 0.73±0.20 a | 2.36±0.10 a | 0.29±0.14 a | 0.11±0.02 a | 0.24±0.05 a | 0.73±0.12 a |
K60 | 2.96±0.12 a | 0.11±0.00 a | 0.42±0.05 a | 0.18±0.01 a | 0.69±0.04 a | 1.96±0.14 b | 0.29±0.03 a | 0.11±0.01 a | 0.22±0.02 a | 0.62±0.11 ab | |
K120 | 2.83±0.23 ab | 0.11±0.00 a | 0.39±0.02 a | 0.18±0.00 a | 0.68±0.08 a | 2.02±0.11 b | 0.28±0.03 a | 0.10±0.01 a | 0.19±a0.01 a | 0.60±0.07 ab | |
K180 | 2.82±0.11 ab | 0.12±0.01 a | 0.42±0.10 a | 0.18±0.01 a | 0.69±0.22 a | 2.06±0.23 b | 0.28±0.17 a | 0.10±0.01 a | 0.17±0.01 ab | 0.57±0.05 ab | |
K240 | 2.76±0.22 b | 0.11±0.01 a | 0.39±0.06 a | 0.16±0.00 a | 0.54±0.15 b | 2.09±0.17 b | 0.28±0.10 a | 0.09±0.02 a | 0.12±0.06 b | 0.38±0.05 b | |
2019 | K0 | 2.86±0.27 a | 0.12±0.01 a | 0.28±0.09 a | 0.27±0.02 a | 0.81±0.18 a | 2.29±0.39 a | 0.29±0.05 a | 0.04±0.01 a | 0.25±0.05 a | 1.07±0.10 a |
K60 | 2.85±0.26 a | 0.13±0.01 a | 0.29±0.07 a | 0.26±0.02 a | 0.77±0.12 a | 2.22±0.17 a | 0.27±0.03 a | 0.04±0.01 a | 0.24±0.04 a | 1.01±0.09 a | |
K120 | 2.82±0.27 a | 0.12±0.00 a | 0.29±0.09 a | 0.26±0.01 a | 0.76±0.06 a | 2.05±0.10 b | 0.25±0.02 a | 0.05±0.01 a | 0.24±0.06 a | 1.06±0.06 a | |
K180 | 2.75±0.13 a | 0.11±0.00 a | 0.19±0.03 b | 0.22±0.02 b | 0.65±0.07 a | 1.78±0.25 c | 0.24±0.02 a | 0.04±0.01 a | 0.19±0.01 b | 0.75±0.09 b | |
K240 | 2.27±0.15 b | 0.11±0.00 a | 0.16±0.07 b | 0.21±0.01 b | 0.70±0.12 a | 1.70±0.25 c | 0.24±0.04 a | 0.04±0.01 a | 0.19±0.02 b | 0.71±0.10 b |
表3 不同施钾量对蕲艾叶片中黄酮及酚酸类成分的影响
Table 3 Effects of K application rates on the flavonoids and phenolic acids in the leaves of Artemisiaargyi
年份 Year | 处理 Treatment | 总黄酮 Total flavonoids/% | 新绿原酸 Neochlorogenic acid/(mg·g-1) | 绿原酸 Chlorogenic acid/(mg·g-1) | 隐绿原酸 Cryptochlorogenic acid/(mg·g-1) | 异绿原酸B Isochlorogenic acid B/(mg·g-1) | 异绿原酸A Isochlorogenic acid A/(mg·g-1) | 异绿原酸C Isochlorogenic acid C/(mg·g-1) | 山奈酚 Keampferol/(mg·g-1) | 棕矢车菊素 Jeceosidin/(mg·g-1) | 异泽兰黄素 Eupatilin/ (mg·g-1) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2018 | K0 | 2.85±0.15 ab | 0.12±0.01 a | 0.42±0.03 a | 0.18±0.01 a | 0.73±0.20 a | 2.36±0.10 a | 0.29±0.14 a | 0.11±0.02 a | 0.24±0.05 a | 0.73±0.12 a |
K60 | 2.96±0.12 a | 0.11±0.00 a | 0.42±0.05 a | 0.18±0.01 a | 0.69±0.04 a | 1.96±0.14 b | 0.29±0.03 a | 0.11±0.01 a | 0.22±0.02 a | 0.62±0.11 ab | |
K120 | 2.83±0.23 ab | 0.11±0.00 a | 0.39±0.02 a | 0.18±0.00 a | 0.68±0.08 a | 2.02±0.11 b | 0.28±0.03 a | 0.10±0.01 a | 0.19±a0.01 a | 0.60±0.07 ab | |
K180 | 2.82±0.11 ab | 0.12±0.01 a | 0.42±0.10 a | 0.18±0.01 a | 0.69±0.22 a | 2.06±0.23 b | 0.28±0.17 a | 0.10±0.01 a | 0.17±0.01 ab | 0.57±0.05 ab | |
K240 | 2.76±0.22 b | 0.11±0.01 a | 0.39±0.06 a | 0.16±0.00 a | 0.54±0.15 b | 2.09±0.17 b | 0.28±0.10 a | 0.09±0.02 a | 0.12±0.06 b | 0.38±0.05 b | |
2019 | K0 | 2.86±0.27 a | 0.12±0.01 a | 0.28±0.09 a | 0.27±0.02 a | 0.81±0.18 a | 2.29±0.39 a | 0.29±0.05 a | 0.04±0.01 a | 0.25±0.05 a | 1.07±0.10 a |
K60 | 2.85±0.26 a | 0.13±0.01 a | 0.29±0.07 a | 0.26±0.02 a | 0.77±0.12 a | 2.22±0.17 a | 0.27±0.03 a | 0.04±0.01 a | 0.24±0.04 a | 1.01±0.09 a | |
K120 | 2.82±0.27 a | 0.12±0.00 a | 0.29±0.09 a | 0.26±0.01 a | 0.76±0.06 a | 2.05±0.10 b | 0.25±0.02 a | 0.05±0.01 a | 0.24±0.06 a | 1.06±0.06 a | |
K180 | 2.75±0.13 a | 0.11±0.00 a | 0.19±0.03 b | 0.22±0.02 b | 0.65±0.07 a | 1.78±0.25 c | 0.24±0.02 a | 0.04±0.01 a | 0.19±0.01 b | 0.75±0.09 b | |
K240 | 2.27±0.15 b | 0.11±0.00 a | 0.16±0.07 b | 0.21±0.01 b | 0.70±0.12 a | 1.70±0.25 c | 0.24±0.04 a | 0.04±0.01 a | 0.19±0.02 b | 0.71±0.10 b |
年份 Year | 处理 Treatment | N/ % | P/ % | K/ % | Ca/ (mg·g-1) | Mg/ (mg·g-1) | Mn/ (mg·g-1) | Fe/ (mg·g-1) | Cu/ (mg·g-1) | Zn/ (mg·g-1) | N/K | Ca/K | Mg/k |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2018 | K0 | 2.93±0.01 a | 0.41±0.04 a | 1.88±0.03 b | 2.71±0.42 b | 0.40±0.02 a | 662.55±23.04 a | 546.42±48.48 b | 19.46±0.28 a | 55.61±11.25 a | 1.59±0.27 a | 0.31±0.03 b | 0.02±0.00 a |
K60 | 2.87±0.01 a | 0.45±0.03 a | 2.16±0.10 ab | 2.51±0.53 b | 0.41±0.04 a | 774.62±42.70 a | 589.03±51.10 b | 19.96±0.75 a | 59.80±7.97 a | 1.41±0.13 ab | 0.39±0.05 a | 0.02±0.00 a | |
K120 | 2.79±0.10 a | 0.36±0.01 a | 2.25±0.06 a | 4.02±0.10 a | 0.42±0.16 a | 694.37±166.31 a | 591.12±114.40 b | 19.98±1.06 a | 58.39±5.41 a | 1.34±0.20 b | 0.40±0.06 a | 0.02±0.00 a | |
K180 | 2.75±0.07 a | 0.35±0.02 a | 2.28±0.01 a | 4.31±0.34 a | 0.45±0.07 a | 694.11±126.39 a | 685.82±117.98 ab | 17.37±0.97 a | 61.08±4.19 a | 1.32±0.31 b | 0.42±0.04 a | 0.02±0.00 a | |
K240 | 2.44±0.04 b | 0.37±0.03 a | 2.23±0.02 a | 4.51±0.18 a | 0.55±0.12 a | 690.11±98.05 a | 860.61±61.28 a | 17.42±2.12 a | 62.05±9.53 a | 1.22±0.29 b | 0.32±0.02 b | 0.02±0.00 a | |
2019 | K0 | 1.95±0.17 c | 0.42±0.03 a | 2.37±0.24 c | 2.26±0.25 c | 0.56±0.02 a | 570.56±23.78 a | 412.00±63.34 b | 15.04±2.41 a | 27.13±5.63 ba | 0.80±0.19 a | 0.16±0.04 c | 0.02±0.00 a |
K60 | 1.89±0.05 c | 0.42±0.03 a | 2.54±0.42 b | 2.63±0.33 c | 0.57±0.06 a | 549.13±40.01 a | 436.37±3.544 b | 13.28±0.80 a | 30.75±7.94 b | 0.76±0.11 a | 0.24±0.03 b | 0.02±0.00 a | |
K120 | 1.87±0.08 a | 0.46±0.05 a | 2.64±0.19 ab | 3.10±0.48 c | 0.57±0.03 a | 532.23±93.72 a | 459.33±73.79 b | 13.49±1.38 a | 33.83±10.88 ab | 0.72±0.12 a | 0.33±0.06 b | 0.02±0.00 a | |
K180 | 1.83±0.14 a | 0.45±0.03 a | 2.66±0.24 a | 11.63±0.12 b | 0.62±0.01 a | 500.87±70.73 a | 467.06±22.57 b | 13.79±1.28 a | 44.33±9.89 a | 0.73±0.09 a | 0.52±0.08 a | 0.02±0.00 a | |
K240 | 1.76±0.10 a | 0.38±0.03 a | 2.78±0.17 a | 16.10±0.53 a | 0.63±0.01 a | 517.12±59.43 a | 774.52±60.72 a | 13.73±0.47 a | 47.72±7.01 a | 0.65±0.13 a | 0.39±0.02 ab | 0.02±0.00 a |
表4 不同施钾量下蕲艾叶片中9种矿质元素含量及比例
Table 4 Contents of 9 mineral elements and the ratios of N/K, Ca/K, Mg/K in the leaves of Artemisiaargyi under different K application rates
年份 Year | 处理 Treatment | N/ % | P/ % | K/ % | Ca/ (mg·g-1) | Mg/ (mg·g-1) | Mn/ (mg·g-1) | Fe/ (mg·g-1) | Cu/ (mg·g-1) | Zn/ (mg·g-1) | N/K | Ca/K | Mg/k |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2018 | K0 | 2.93±0.01 a | 0.41±0.04 a | 1.88±0.03 b | 2.71±0.42 b | 0.40±0.02 a | 662.55±23.04 a | 546.42±48.48 b | 19.46±0.28 a | 55.61±11.25 a | 1.59±0.27 a | 0.31±0.03 b | 0.02±0.00 a |
K60 | 2.87±0.01 a | 0.45±0.03 a | 2.16±0.10 ab | 2.51±0.53 b | 0.41±0.04 a | 774.62±42.70 a | 589.03±51.10 b | 19.96±0.75 a | 59.80±7.97 a | 1.41±0.13 ab | 0.39±0.05 a | 0.02±0.00 a | |
K120 | 2.79±0.10 a | 0.36±0.01 a | 2.25±0.06 a | 4.02±0.10 a | 0.42±0.16 a | 694.37±166.31 a | 591.12±114.40 b | 19.98±1.06 a | 58.39±5.41 a | 1.34±0.20 b | 0.40±0.06 a | 0.02±0.00 a | |
K180 | 2.75±0.07 a | 0.35±0.02 a | 2.28±0.01 a | 4.31±0.34 a | 0.45±0.07 a | 694.11±126.39 a | 685.82±117.98 ab | 17.37±0.97 a | 61.08±4.19 a | 1.32±0.31 b | 0.42±0.04 a | 0.02±0.00 a | |
K240 | 2.44±0.04 b | 0.37±0.03 a | 2.23±0.02 a | 4.51±0.18 a | 0.55±0.12 a | 690.11±98.05 a | 860.61±61.28 a | 17.42±2.12 a | 62.05±9.53 a | 1.22±0.29 b | 0.32±0.02 b | 0.02±0.00 a | |
2019 | K0 | 1.95±0.17 c | 0.42±0.03 a | 2.37±0.24 c | 2.26±0.25 c | 0.56±0.02 a | 570.56±23.78 a | 412.00±63.34 b | 15.04±2.41 a | 27.13±5.63 ba | 0.80±0.19 a | 0.16±0.04 c | 0.02±0.00 a |
K60 | 1.89±0.05 c | 0.42±0.03 a | 2.54±0.42 b | 2.63±0.33 c | 0.57±0.06 a | 549.13±40.01 a | 436.37±3.544 b | 13.28±0.80 a | 30.75±7.94 b | 0.76±0.11 a | 0.24±0.03 b | 0.02±0.00 a | |
K120 | 1.87±0.08 a | 0.46±0.05 a | 2.64±0.19 ab | 3.10±0.48 c | 0.57±0.03 a | 532.23±93.72 a | 459.33±73.79 b | 13.49±1.38 a | 33.83±10.88 ab | 0.72±0.12 a | 0.33±0.06 b | 0.02±0.00 a | |
K180 | 1.83±0.14 a | 0.45±0.03 a | 2.66±0.24 a | 11.63±0.12 b | 0.62±0.01 a | 500.87±70.73 a | 467.06±22.57 b | 13.79±1.28 a | 44.33±9.89 a | 0.73±0.09 a | 0.52±0.08 a | 0.02±0.00 a | |
K240 | 1.76±0.10 a | 0.38±0.03 a | 2.78±0.17 a | 16.10±0.53 a | 0.63±0.01 a | 517.12±59.43 a | 774.52±60.72 a | 13.73±0.47 a | 47.72±7.01 a | 0.65±0.13 a | 0.39±0.02 ab | 0.02±0.00 a |
图2 2018年和2019年蕲艾产量、叶片出绒率、化学成分及矿质元素含量的相关性注:X1—叶片产量;X2—出绒率;X3—总挥发油;X4—桉油精;X5—α-侧柏酮;X6—樟脑;X7—龙脑;X8—α-石竹烯;X9—β-丁香烯;X10—石竹素;X11—总黄酮;X12—新绿原酸;X13—绿原酸;X14—隐绿原酸;X15—异绿原酸B;X16—异绿原酸A;X17—异绿原酸C;X18—山奈酚;X19—棕矢车菊素;X20—异泽兰黄素;X21—氮;X22—磷;X23—钾;X24—钙;X25—镁;X26—锰;X27—铁;X28—铜;X29—锌。
Fig.2 Correlation between yield, output rate of moxa, chemical components and mineral elements in the leaves of Artemisiaargyi in 2018 and 2019Note:X1—Leaf yield; X2—Output rate of moxa; X3—Total volatile oil; X4—Eucalyptus oleoresin; X5—α-Thujone; X6—Camphor; X7—Borneol; X8—α-Caryophyllene; X9—β-Butene; X10—Caryophyllin; X11—Total flavonoids; X12—Neochlorogenic acid; X13—Chlorogenic acid; X14—Cryptochlorogenic acid; X15—Isochlorogenic acid B; X16—Isochlorogenic acid A; X17—Isochlorogenic acid C; X18—Keampferol; X19—Jeceosidin; X20—Eupatilin; X21—N; X22—P; X23—K; X24—Ca; X25—Mg; X26—Mn; X27—Fe; X28—Cu; X29—Zn.
1 | 张元,康利平,郭兰萍,等.艾叶的本草考证和应用研究进展[J].上海针灸杂志,2017,36(3):245-255. |
ZHANG Y, KANG L P, GUO L P, et al. Herbalogical study of mugwort leaves and research advances in its application [J]. Shanghai J. Acupuncture Moxibustion, 2017, 36(3): 245-255. | |
2 | 李国清,马磊,石岩.不同钾肥处理对甜叶菊生长发育及叶产量的影响[J].中国糖料, 2011(1): 36-38. |
LI G Q, MA L, SHI Y. Effects of different potassium fertilizer on growth, development and yield of Stevia rebaudiana [J]. China Sugar, 2011(1): 36-38. | |
3 | 赵倩,任仟,陈玉敏,等.磷肥和钾肥配合施用对甘草有效成分的影响[J].林业与生态科学,2019,34(1):87-92. |
ZHAO Q, REN Q, CHEN Y M, et al.. Effects of combined application of phosphate and potash fertilizer on the active ingredients of licorice [J]. For. Ecol. Sci., 2019, 34(1):87-92. | |
4 | 介晓磊,王镇,化党领,等.生物有机肥对土壤氮磷钾及烟叶品质成分的影响[J].中国农学通报,2010,26(1):109-114. |
JIE X L, WANG Z, HUA D L, et al.. Effects of bio-organic fertilizer on conventional components of soil and flue-cured tobacco [J]. Chin. Agric. Sci. Bull., 2010, 26(1):109-114. | |
5 | 李鹏程,郑苍松,孙淼,等.棉花施肥技术与营养机理研究进展[J].棉花学报,2017,29(S1):118-130. |
LI P C, ZHENG C S, SUN M, et al.. Research progress on fertilization technology and nutrition mechanism of cotton [J]. Cotton. Sci., 2017, 29(S1):118-130. | |
6 | 许自成,秦璐,邵惠芳,等.烤烟钾含量与多酚、有机酸含量及评吸品质的关系[J].河南农业大学学报,2010,44(4):383-389. |
XU Z C, QIN L, SHAO H F, et al.. Relationship between content of potassium and polyphenols, organic acids and sensory quality in flue-cured tobacco leaves [J]. J. Henan Agric.Univ., 2010, 44(4):383-389. | |
7 | 胡吉清.中、韩等不同产地艾叶及类似品的比较鉴定与质量分析[D].武汉:中南民族大学,2016. |
HU J Q. Comparative identification and quality analysis of Artemisiaargyi leaves and similar products from different origins in China and Korea [D]. Wuhan: South-Central University for Nationalities, 2016. | |
8 | 李玲,吕磊,吕狄亚,等.GC-MS法测定艾叶中5种挥发性成分的含量[J].中国民族民间医药,2017,26(20):27. |
LI L, LV L, LU D Y, et al.. Rapid determination of five volatile components from Artemisiaeargyi folium by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry [J]. Chin. J. Ethnomedicine Ethnopharmacy, 2017, 26(20):27. | |
9 | 王小俊,邓玉环,张丽萍,等.UPLC-DAD-MS定性和定量分析蕲艾中的酚酸和黄酮类成分[J].中国中药杂志,2019,44(5):983-989. |
WANG X J, DENG Y H, ZHANG L P, et al.. Identification and determination of phenolic acids and flavonoids in Artemisiaeargyi folium by UPLC-DAD-MS [J]. China J. Chin. Materia Med., 2019, 44(5):983-989. | |
10 | 卢化,张义生,黎强,等.蕲艾的HPLC指纹图谱研究[J].中国药房,2015,26(9):1255. |
LU H, ZHANG Y S, LI Q, et al.. Study on the fingerprint of Artemisiaargyi by HPLC [J]. China Pharmacy, 2015, 26(9):1255. | |
11 | 徐皓,刘水英.湿法消解-原子吸收光谱法测定紫山药中矿质元素[J].食品科学,2015,36(16):192-196. |
XU H, LIU S Y. Determination of mineral elements in dioscoreaalata L. tubers by atomic absorption spectrometry with wet digestion [J]. Food Sci., 2015, 36(16):192-196. | |
12 | 赵娜,秦都林,聂军军,等.钾肥对不同抗虫棉品种叶片光系统Ⅱ性能的影响[J].植物营养与肥料学报, 2019,25(1):106-114. |
ZHAO N, QIN D L, NIE J J, et al.. Effects of potassium application on performance of photosystem Ⅱ of various Bt cotton genotypes [J]. Plant Nutr. Fert. Sci., 2019, 25(1):106-114. | |
13 | 马琳,陈昌婕,康利平,等.不同种植密度、叶位与叶龄对蕲艾产量和品质的影响[J].中国中药杂志,2020, 45(17):4031-4040. |
MA L, CHEN C J, KANG L P, et al.. Effects of different planting density, leaf position and leaf age on growth and quality of Artemisiaargyi var. Argyi ‘Qiai’ [J]. China J. Chin. Materia Med., 2020, 45(17):4031-4040. | |
14 | 钟晓兰,张德远,周生路,等.钾肥用量及基追肥比例对烤烟干物质累积和钾素吸收动态的影响[J].应用生态学报,2006(2):251-255. |
ZHONG X L, ZHANG D Y, ZHOU S L, et al.. Effects of potassium application rate and its supplemental proportion on dry matter accumulation and potassium absorption of flue-cured tobacco [J]. Chin. J. Appl. Ecol., 2006(2):251-255. | |
15 | 谭杰,孔凡磊,曾晖,等.川中丘陵春玉米适宜钾肥用量研究[J].植物营养与肥料学报,2016,22(3):838-846. |
TAN J, KONG F L, ZENG H, et al.. The suitable potassium fertilizer rate in spring maize in hilly area of central Sichuan Basin, China [J]. Plant Nutr. Fert. Sci., 2016, 22(3):838-846. | |
16 | 包亚英,胡秀英,郝雨杉,等.不同施肥处理对甜菊生长及糖苷含量和积累量的影响[J].植物资源与环境学报,2016,25(1):71-80. |
BAO Y Y, HU X Y, HAO Y S, et al.. Effects of different fertilizer treatments on growth, content and accumulation of glycoside in Steviarebaudiana [J]. J. Plant Resour. Environ., 2016, 25(1):71-80. | |
17 | JUDEL G K, MENGEL K. Effect of shading on nonstructural carbohydrates and their turnover in culms and leaves during the grain filling period of spring wheat [J]. Crop Sci., 1982, 22(5):958-962. |
18 | 汪顺义,李欢,史衍玺.不同施钾方式对甘薯钾素吸收及产量的影响[J].植物营养与肥料学报,2016,22(2):557-564. |
WANG S Y, LI H, SHI Y X. Effect of K application method on K absorption and yield of sweet potato [J]. Plant Nutr. Fert. Sci., 2016, 22(2):557-564. | |
19 | 武娟,万定荣,赵百孝,等.艾绒的质量评价标准及其商品分级研究[J].中国药业,2019,28(24):4-7. |
WU J, WAN D R, ZHAO B X, et al.. Quality evaluation standard and commodity classification of moxa [J]. China Pharmaceuticals, 2019, 28(24):4-7. | |
20 | 植汉成,郭宝林,葛菲,等.非腺毛形态在(药用)植物分类和植物类药材鉴别方面的研究进展[J].中国现代中药,2018,20(4):489-494. |
ZHI H C, GUO B L, GE F, et al.. Research progress of non-glandular hairs morphology in classification of medicinal plants and identification of plant medicinal materials [J]. Modern Chin. Medicine, 2018, 20(4):489-494. | |
21 | 吴凯.胁迫条件下胡杨与意大利杨细胞内Ca2+水平和Ca2+-ATPase活性的变化[D].北京:北京林业大学, 2007. |
WU K. Changes of Ca2+ and Ca2+-ATPase activities in cells of Populuseuphratica and P. euramericana under stress [D]. Beijin: Beijing Forestry University, 2007. | |
22 | TRAW M B, BERGELSON J. Interactive effects of jasmonic acid, salicylic acid, and gibberellin on induction of trichomes in Arabidopsis [J]. Plant Physiol., 2003, 133(3):1367-1375. |
23 | 涂冰洁,刘长锴,田博文,等.菜用大豆和普通大豆叶片内源激素活性对钾素营养响应的差异研究[J].大豆科学,2016,35(6):969-974. |
TU B J, LIU C K, TIAN B W, et al.. Study on response differences to potassium nutrition in leaf endogenous hormone dynamic changes of vegetable soybean and grain soybean [J]. Soybean Sci., 2016, 35(6):969-974. | |
24 | 李春娜,占颖,刘洋洋,等.艾蒿药理作用和开发利用研究进展[J].中华中医药杂志,2014,29(12):3889-3891. |
LI C N, ZHAN Y, LIU Y Y, et al.. Research progress on pharmacological activities and development utilization Artemisiaargyi Levl.et Vant. [J]. China J. Trad. Chin. Med. Pharmacy, 2014, 29(12):3889-3891. | |
25 | 胡倩,刘大会,曹艳.艾叶黄酮类化合物的研究进展[J].食品安全质量检测学报,2019,10(12):3648-3653. |
HU Q, LIU D H, CAO Y. Research progress on flavonoids from Artemisiaargyi [J]. J. Food Safety Quality, 2019, 10(12):3648-3653. | |
26 | 卢丽兰,杨新全,杨勇,等.不同供氮水平对广藿香产量与品质的影响[J].植物营养与肥料学报,2014,20(3):702-708. |
LU L L, YANG X Q, YANG Y, et al.. Effect of different nitrogen levels on yield and quality of Pogostemoncablin [J]. Plant Nutr. Fert. Sci., 2014, 20(3):702-708. | |
27 | 曹艺雯,屈仁军,王磊,等.减量施氮对菘蓝生长及药材质量的影响[J].植物营养与肥料学报,2019,25(5):765-772. |
CAO Y W, QU R J, WANG L, et al.. Effect of nitrogen reduction on growth and quality of Isatisindigotica Fort. [J]. Plant Nutr. Fert. Sci., 2019, 25(5):765-772. | |
28 | 张锋,韩金龙,倪大鹏,等.不同钾肥用量对白花丹参产量及药材品质的影响[J].山东农业科学,2014,46(10):60-62,67. |
ZHANG F, HAN J L, NI D P, et al.. Effects of different potassium fertilizer rates on yield and quality of Salviamiltiorrhiza Bunge f. alba [J]. J. Shandong Agric. Sci., 2014, 46(10):60-62,67. | |
29 | 王千,依艳丽,张淑香.不同钾肥对番茄幼苗酚类物质代谢作用的影响[J].植物营养与肥料学报,2012,18(3):706-716. |
WANG Q, YI Y L, ZHANG S X. Effects of different potassium on phenol metabolism of tomato seedlings [J]. Plant Nutr. Fert. Sci., 2012, 18(3):706-716. | |
30 | 卢国理,汤利,楚轶欧.单/间作条件下氮肥水平对水稻总酚和类黄酮的影响[J].植物营养与肥料学报,2008,14(6):1064-1069. |
LU G L, TANG L, CHU Y. Effects of nitrogen fertilizer levels on rice total phenols and flavonoids under mono/intercropping conditions [J]. Plant Nutr. Fert. Sci., 2008, 14(6):1064-1069. | |
31 | 刘大会,杨特武,朱端卫,等.不同钾肥用量对福田河白菊产量和质量的影响[J].中草药,2007(1):120-124. |
LIU D H, YANG T W, ZHU D W, et al. Effect of potassium application at various rates on yield and quality of flower in Chrysanthemummorifolium from Futianhe region [J]. Chin. Trad. Herbal Drugs, 2007(1):120-124. | |
32 | 薛启,王康才,梁永富,等.氮锌互作对藿香生长、产量及有效成分的影响[J].中国中药杂志,2018,43(13):2654-2663. |
XUE Q, WANG K C, LIANG Y F, et al.. Effects of N and Zn interaction on growth, yield and active components of Agastacherugose [J]. China J. Chin. Materia Medica, 2018, 43(13):2654-2663. | |
33 | 韩建萍,梁宗锁,王敬民.矿质元素与根类中草药根系生长发育及有效成分累积的关系[J].植物生理学通讯,2003(1):78-82. |
HAN J P, LIANG Z S, WANG J M. The relationship between mineral elements and the root growth and accumulation of effective ingredient in root of traditional herbs [J]. Plant Physiol. Comm., 2003(1):78-82. |
[1] | 许鑫, 马兆务, 熊淑萍, 马新明, 程涛, 李海洋, 赵锦鹏. 基于气候年型的河南省冬小麦产量预测[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2022, 24(2): 136-144. |
[2] | 李宝石, 刘文科, 王奇, 邵明杰. 起垄内嵌基质栽培对日光温室夏季黄瓜根区温度、生长和产量的影响[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2022, 24(2): 177-183. |
[3] | 周旋, 杨嫔玲, 彭建伟, 柴慧清, 钟雪梅, 康兴蓉, 龙俊佑, 张慧茹. 功能菌型复合肥减施对结球甘蓝产量、品质及经济效益的影响[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2022, 24(2): 184-192. |
[4] | 王健, 许爱玲, 卫晓东, 席吉龙, 杨娜, 王珂, 席天元, 张建诚. 运城盆地不同播期小麦春季冻害风险评价[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2022, 24(1): 137-147. |
[5] | 王志丹, 刘吉利, 吴娜. 粉垄耕作对甜高粱光合生理特性及产量的影响[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2022, 24(1): 148-156. |
[6] | 黄渝岚§, 龙盛风§, 叶兴枝, 李艳英, 申章佑, 周佳, 周灵芝, 劳承英, 韦本辉. 木薯在湖北恩施的农艺性状及产量品质研究[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2021, 23(9): 46-55. |
[7] | 孙梦遥, 徐岚俊, 李小龙, 李传友, 陈华, 张传帅, 刘婞韬. 不同节水方式对油菜水分利用、分配及产量的影响[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2021, 23(9): 138-143. |
[8] | 李生梅, 张大伟, 迪丽拜尔·迪力买买提, 魏鑫, 芮存, 杨涛, 耿世伟, 高文伟. 减量灌溉对转ScALDH21基因棉花农艺性状、产量和品质的影响[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2021, 23(9): 152-159. |
[9] | 李成晨, 索海翠, 罗焕明, 安康, 刘计涛, 王丽, 单建伟, 杨少海, 李小波. 化肥减施和施肥方式对马铃薯产量和块茎氮素积累的影响[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2021, 23(9): 173-182. |
[10] | 吴子帅, 李虎, 黄秋要, 陈传华, 罗群昌, 周新明, 吴佳桔, 刘广林. 施氮量和栽插密度对桂育11号产量和稻米品质的影响[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2021, 23(8): 154-162. |
[11] | 翁文安, 程爽, 李绍平, 田晋钰, 陶钰, 胡群, 胡雅杰, 郭保卫, 魏海燕, 邢志鹏, 张洪程. 氮肥一次性基施对不同成穗方式下直播常规粳稻产量的影响[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2021, 23(8): 163-172. |
[12] | 朱利霞, 陈居田, 徐思薇, 陈如冰, 李俐俐. 生物炭施用下土壤微生物量碳氮的动态变化[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2021, 23(8): 193-200. |
[13] | 坚天才, 康建宏, 吴宏亮, 刘根红, 高娣, 马雪莹, 李鑫. 氮素缓解春小麦花后高温早衰的抗氧化特性研究[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2021, 23(7): 33-44. |
[14] | 周旋, 康兴蓉, 彭建伟, 杨相东, 钟雪梅, 胡文峰, 龙俊佑. 聚氨酯包膜氮肥减施对双季早稻生长、产量及经济效益的影响[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2021, 23(7): 153-161. |
[15] | 罗友谊, 王慰亲, 郑华斌, 刘功义, 巢英, 徐彩, 郑志刚, 李雪倩, 韦银兰, 唐启源. 不同机械有序种植方式对水稻生长特性及产量的影响[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2021, 23(7): 162-171. |
阅读次数 | ||||||
全文 |
|
|||||
摘要 |
|
|||||