草甘膦对大豆田土壤养分及其功能酶活性的影响

doi:10.13304/j.nykjdb.2021.0781

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

为探究草甘膦对大豆田土壤养分及其功能酶活性的影响，以转基因抗草甘膦大豆呼交06-698为材料，采用田间试验方法，研究了1.2、2.4、3.6 kg·hm^-2草甘膦对大豆田土壤氮（N）、磷（P）、钾（K）及其功能酶活性的影响。2年试验结果均表明，在草甘膦2.4 kg·hm^-2和3.6 kg·hm^-2用量下，大豆田土壤碱解氮含量、速效磷含量、脲酶、纤维素酶、磷酸酶和根瘤固氮酶活性显著降低，降低峰值分别为10.57%、11.30%、67.66%、40.62%、45.88%和74.49%，过氧化氢酶活性显著升高，2年间的升高峰值为131.93%，速效钾含量不受草甘膦影响。这种影响随草甘膦施用后时间延长而逐步恢复正常，长时间不会对土壤养分及其功能酶活性带来不利影响。通过主成分与综合评价方法分析，草甘膦用量为2.4和3.6 kg·hm^-2时，以土壤N、P、K养分及其功能酶活性为主成分的土壤质量均高于CK。研究结果可为农田生态系统可持续利用和转基因抗草甘膦大豆商业化种植提供理论依据。

关键词: 草甘膦, 大豆田, 土壤养分, 土壤酶

Abstract:

To investigate the effects of glyphosate on soil nutrients and the functional enzyme activities in soybean fields， this paper investigated the effect of 1.2， 2.4 and 3.6 kg·hm^-2 of glyphosate on soil nitrogen（N）， phosphorus（P）， potassium （K） and the functional enzyme activities in soybean fields using a field experiment with transgenic glyphosate-resistant soybean Hujiao 06-698 as material. The results of 2 years of trials showed that the content of soil alkaline nitrogen and available phosphorus， and the enzyme activities of urease， cellulase， phosphatase and nodule nitrogenase activities were significantly reduced with peaks of 10.57%， 11.30%， 67.66%， 40.62%， 45.88% and 74.49%， respectively， and catalase activity was significantly increased with peaks of 131.93% in the two years in soybean fields at 2.4 kg·hm^-2 and 3.6 kg·hm^-2of glyphosate use rate， while available potassium content was not affected by glyphosate. However， this effect gradually returned to normal with time the extension of time after glyphosate application and did not bring adverse effect on soil nutrients and the functional enzyme activities for a long time. The soil quality analyzed by principal component and integrated evaluation methods with soil N， P and K nutrients and the functional enzyme activities as the main components was higher than that of CK at 2.4 kg·hm^-2and 3.6 kg·hm^-2of glyphosate use rate.The results of the research can provide a theoretical basis for sustainable utilization of farmland ecosystem and commercial planting of transgenic glyphosate-resistant soybeans.

Key words: glyphosate, soybean field, soil nutrients, soil enzymes

中图分类号:

S565.1

陈奎元, 刘卉, 丁伟. 草甘膦对大豆田土壤养分及其功能酶活性的影响[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2022, 24(5): 180-188.

Kuiyuan CHEN, Hui LIU, Wei DING. Effect of Glyphosate on Soil Nutrient and the Functional Enzyme Activities in Soybean Fields[J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2022, 24(5): 180-188.

图/表 11

参考文献 27

1	PRIMOST J E, MARINO D J G, APARICIO V C, et al.. Glyphosate and AMPA, “pseudo-persistent” pollutants under real-world agricultural management practices in the Mesopotamic Pampas agroecosystem, Argentina [J]. Environ. Pollut., 2017, 229:771-779.
2	JEYASEKHAR M P. A study to investigate the organic carbon status of glyphosate soils [J]. Int. J. Environ. Res., 2021, 3(1):23-27.
3	LANE M, LORENZ N, SAXENA J, et al.. Microbial activity, community structure and potassium dynamics in rhizosphere soil of soybean plants treated with glyphosate [J]. Pedobiologia, 2012, 55(3):153-159.
4	姚玉波.大豆根瘤固氮特性与影响因素的研究[D]. 哈尔滨:东北农业大学, 2012.
	YAO Y B. Study on characteristics of nodule nitrogen fixation and influencing factors of soybean [D]. Harbin: Northeast Agricultural University, 2012.
5	周垂帆,林静雯,李莹,等.草甘膦对土壤磷形态及有效性的影响[J].西北林学院学报, 2016, 31(6): 71-77.
	ZHOU C F, LIN J W, LI Y, et al.. Effects of glyphosate on inorganic phosphorus transformation in soil [J]. J. Northwest Forest.Univ., 2016,31(6):71-77.
6	呼蕾,和文祥,王旭东,等.草甘膦的土壤酶效应研究[J].农业环境科学学报, 2009, 28(4): 680-685.
	HU L, HE W X, WANG X D, et al.. Effect of glyphosate on soil enzyme [J]. J. Agro-Environ. Sci., 2009, 28(4): 680-685.
7	YU Y, ZHANG H, ZHOU Q. Using soil available P and activities of soil dehydrogenase and phosphatase as indicators for biodegradation of organophosphorus pesticide methamidophos and glyphosate [J]. Soil Sediment Contam., 2011, 20(6):688-701.
8	LANE M, LORENZ N, SAXENA J, et al.. The effect of glyphosate on soil microbial activity, microbial community structure, and soil potassium [J]. Pedobiologia, 2012, 55(6):688-701.
9	FAN L, FENG Y, WEAVER D B, et al.. Glyphosate effects on symbiotic nitrogen fixation in glyphosate-resistant soybean [J]. Appl. Soil Ecol., 2017, 121:11-19.
10	严君,韩晓增.盆栽条件下土壤无机氮浓度对大豆结瘤、固氮和产量的影响[J].中国农业科学, 2014, 47(10): 1929-1938.
	YAN J, HAN X Z. Effect of soil inorganic N concentrations on the nodulation, N₂ fixation and yield in soybean in a pot experiment [J]. Sci. Agric. Sin., 2014, 47(10): 1929-1938.
11	姜伟丽,马小艳,彭军,等.除草剂草甘膦对棉田土壤酶活性的影响[J].棉花学报, 2014, 26(5): 431-437.
	JIANG W L, MA X Y, PENG J, et al.. Effects of glyphosate on soil enzyme activities in cotton fields [J]. Cotton. Sci., 2014, 26(5): 431-437.
12	侯文军,邹明,李宝福,等.草甘膦对桉树人工林土壤酶活性的影响[J].东北林业大学学报, 2020, 48(11): 76-79.
	HOU W J, ZOU M, LI B F, et al.. Effect of glyphosate on soil enzyme activities in eucalyptus plantations [J]. J. Northeast Forest.Univ., 2020, 48(11): 76-79.
13	鲍士旦.土壤农化分析[M]. 3版.北京:中国农业出版社,2000: 22-23.
14	丁伟, 杨隆华, 程茁,等.氟磺胺草醚对大豆根瘤固氮酶活性及光合速率的影响 [J].作物杂志, 2010(4): 81-84.
	DING W, YANG L H, CHENG Z, et al.. Effect of fomesafen on nitrogenase activity and net photosynthesis rate in soybean [J]. Crops, 2010(4): 81-84.
15	张立峰, 丁伟. 复合微生物菌肥对水稻苗床土壤养分及pH值的影响[J].江苏农业科学, 2017, 45(11): 67-69.
16	JENKINS M E, KRAUSZ R F, MATTHEWS J L, et al.. Control of volunteer horseradish and Palmer Amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri) with dicamba and glyphosate [J]. Weed Technol., 2017, 31(6): 852-862.
17	陶波,蒋凌雪,沈晓峰,等.草甘膦对土壤微生物的影响[J].中国油料作物学报, 2011, 33(2): 162-168, 179.
	TAO B, JIANG L X, SHEN X F, et al.. Effects of glyphosate on soil microorganisms [J]. Chin. J. Oil Crop Sci., 2011, 33(2): 162-168, 179.
18	冷建田.草甘膦除草剂对高寒地区转基因大豆田间杂草群落的影响[D].北京:中国农业科学院, 2012.
	LENG J T. Effect of glyphosate on weed communities of transgenic soybean field in the high latitude and cold region [D]. Beijing: Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, 2012.
19	OBOUR A K, STAHLMAN P W, HOLMAN J D. Soil chemical properties as influenced by long-term glyphosate-resistant corn and soybean production in the central Great Plains, USA [J]. Geoderma, 2016, 277: 1-9.
20	VEREECKEN H. Mobility and leaching of glyphosate: a review [J]. Pest Manag. Sci., 2005, 61(12): 1139-1151.
21	章秋艳,李刚,杨志国,等.转基因大豆种植对根际土壤酶活性和养分的影响[J].中国油料作物学报, 2014, 36(3): 409-413.
	ZHANG Q Y, LI G, YANG Z G, et al.. Effects of transgenic soybean on enzyme activities and nutrients in rhizosphere soil [J]. Chin. J. Oil Crop Sci., 2014, 36(3): 409-413.
22	ZHENG L, LI Y, SHANG W, et al.. The inhibitory effect of cadmium and/or mercury on soil enzyme activity, basal respiration, and microbial community structure in coal mine-affected agricultural soil [J]. Ann. Microbiol., 2019, 69(8): 849-859.
23	SPRANKLE P, MEGGITT W F, Adsorption PENNER D., mobility, and microbial degradation of glyphosate in the soil [J]. Weed Sci., 1975, 23(3): 229-234.
24	KULIKOVA N A, ZHELEZOVA A D, VOROPANOV M G, et al.. Monoammonium phosphate effects on glyphosate in soils: mobilization, phytotoxicity, and alteration of the microbial community [J]. Eurasian Soil Sci., 2020, 53(6): 787-797.
25	刘攀.草甘膦对土壤微生态的影响及其抗性和降解真菌的研究[D].长春:吉林大学, 2009.
	LIU P. Effects of glyphosate on the soil microecosystem and research of glyphosate-degradation and glyphosate-resistance fungi [D]. Changchun: Jilin University, 2009.
26	JORGE B, MELLADO R P. Relative effect of glyphosate on glyphosate-tolerant maize rhizobacterial communities is not altered by soil properties [J]. J. Microbiol. Biotechnol., 2012, 22(2): 159-165.
27	吴玉红,田霄鸿,同延安,等.基于主成分分析的土壤肥力综合指数评价 [J].生态学杂志, 2010, 29(1): 173-180.
	WU Y H, TIAN X H, TONG Y A, et al.. Assessment of integrated soil fertility index based on principal components analysis [J]. Chin. J. Ecol., 2010, 29(1): 173-180.

年份 Year	处理 Treatment	碱解氮含量 Alkaline soluble nitrogen content/（mg·kg^-1）
年份 Year	处理 Treatment	7 d	14 d	21 d	28 d
2019	CK	156.25±4.44 c	159.20±2.53 b	170.15±1.93 a	152.04±3.86 c
	T1	172.68±1.93 a	169.52±0.97 a	160.04±1.93 b	176.47±1.93 a
	T2	167.20±1.93 ab	145.72±3.18 c	153.73±4.44 bc	167.20±3.18 b
	T3	162.57±2.63 b	148.25±3.18 c	150.36±5.51 c	141.93±3.86 d
2020	CK	168.55±3.74 a	157.31±7.20 a	135.32±3.85 a	129.26±10.32 a
	T1	150.61±6.78 b	115.74±9.89 c	120.79±0.22 b	117.51±6.47 ab
	T2	150.86±2.73 b	137.34±9.99 b	121.55±8.27 b	111.57±3.06 b
	T3	133.17±2.73 c	140.50±1.95 b	134.56±8.10 a	119.02±10.09 ab

年份 Year	处理 Treatment	碱解氮含量 Alkaline soluble nitrogen content/（mg·kg^-1）
年份 Year	处理 Treatment	7 d	14 d	21 d	28 d
2019	CK	156.25±4.44 c	159.20±2.53 b	170.15±1.93 a	152.04±3.86 c
	T1	172.68±1.93 a	169.52±0.97 a	160.04±1.93 b	176.47±1.93 a
	T2	167.20±1.93 ab	145.72±3.18 c	153.73±4.44 bc	167.20±3.18 b
	T3	162.57±2.63 b	148.25±3.18 c	150.36±5.51 c	141.93±3.86 d
2020	CK	168.55±3.74 a	157.31±7.20 a	135.32±3.85 a	129.26±10.32 a
	T1	150.61±6.78 b	115.74±9.89 c	120.79±0.22 b	117.51±6.47 ab
	T2	150.86±2.73 b	137.34±9.99 b	121.55±8.27 b	111.57±3.06 b
	T3	133.17±2.73 c	140.50±1.95 b	134.56±8.10 a	119.02±10.09 ab

年份 Years	处理 Treatment	速效磷含量Available phosphorus content/（mg·kg^-1）
年份 Years	处理 Treatment	7 d	14 d	21 d	28 d
2019	CK	28.02±0.81 c	38.25±0.96 a	36.37±0.22 b	35.46±1.08 a
	T1	33.20±0.81 a	35.08±1.59 b	34.56±1.62 c	33.07±0.49 b
	T2	31.84±1.76 ab	33.46±0.41 b	37.86±0.81 b	34.43±0.79 ab
	T3	30.28±0.30 b	34.75±0.68 b	39.93±0.19 a	33.65±0.74 b
2020	CK	29.25±1.66 b	38.57±2.16 a	33.85±1.51 a	37.41±2.16 a
	T1	34.75±1.70 a	35.08±0.27 b	33.33±1.85 a	32.61±1.00 b
	T2	33.52±0.89 ab	34.69±1.59 b	34.56±1.29 a	35.08±1.08 ab
	T3	29.89±1.65 ab	33.91±1.97 b	35.46±1.75 a	36.18±0.79 a

年份 Years	处理 Treatment	速效磷含量Available phosphorus content/（mg·kg^-1）
年份 Years	处理 Treatment	7 d	14 d	21 d	28 d
2019	CK	28.02±0.81 c	38.25±0.96 a	36.37±0.22 b	35.46±1.08 a
	T1	33.20±0.81 a	35.08±1.59 b	34.56±1.62 c	33.07±0.49 b
	T2	31.84±1.76 ab	33.46±0.41 b	37.86±0.81 b	34.43±0.79 ab
	T3	30.28±0.30 b	34.75±0.68 b	39.93±0.19 a	33.65±0.74 b
2020	CK	29.25±1.66 b	38.57±2.16 a	33.85±1.51 a	37.41±2.16 a
	T1	34.75±1.70 a	35.08±0.27 b	33.33±1.85 a	32.61±1.00 b
	T2	33.52±0.89 ab	34.69±1.59 b	34.56±1.29 a	35.08±1.08 ab
	T3	29.89±1.65 ab	33.91±1.97 b	35.46±1.75 a	36.18±0.79 a

相关系数 Correlation coefficient	脲酶 Urease	磷酸酶 Phosphatase	过氧化氢酶 Catalase	纤维素酶 Cellulase	根瘤固氮酶 Nodule nitrogenase	碱解氮 Alkaline nitrogen	速效磷 Available phosphorus	速效钾 Available potassium
脲酶 Urease	1. 00
磷酸酶 Phosphatase	0.26	1. 00
过氧化氢酶 Catalase	0.02	0.56^**	1. 00
纤维素酶 Cellulase	0.24	0.45^**	0.08	1. 00
根瘤固氮酶 Nodule nitrogenase	0.36^*	0.32	0.01	0.19	1. 00
碱解氮 Alkaline nitrogen	0.22	0.12	-0.01	-0.17	0.34	1. 00
速效磷 Available phosphorus	-0.31	-0.45^**	-0.40^*	-0.13	-0.47^**	-0.10	1. 00
速效钾 Available potassium	0.12	0.48^**	0.18	0.68^**	0.33	-0.40^*	-0.44^**	1. 00