基于人为控水和自然水分胁迫下的甘蔗茎节生长变化

doi:10.13304/j.nykjdb.2023.0192

中国农业科技导报 ›› 2024, Vol. 26 ›› Issue (7): 25-36.DOI: 10.13304/j.nykjdb.2023.0192

基于人为控水和自然水分胁迫下的甘蔗茎节生长变化

桂意云¹(), 李海碧¹^,², 梁强¹, 杨荣仲¹, 韦金菊¹, 韦德斌³, 李文教³, 刘昔辉¹(), 周会¹()

^1.广西农业科学院甘蔗研究所, 广西甘蔗遗传改良重点实验室, 南宁 530007
^2.广西南亚热带农业科学研究所, 广西崇左 532400
^3.广西百色市农业科学研究所, 广西百色 533612

收稿日期:2023-03-16 接受日期:2023-09-16 出版日期:2024-07-15 发布日期:2024-07-12
通讯作者: 刘昔辉,周会
作者简介:桂意云 E-mail： guiyiyun@gxaas.net
基金资助:
国家重点研发计划项目(2022YFD2301100);国家自然科学基金项目(32160486);国家糖料产业技术体系项目(CARS-17-0150)

Changes of Sugarcane Stem Node Growth Under Artificial Water Control and Natural Water Stress

Yiyun GUI¹(), Haibi LI¹^,², Qiang LIANG¹, Rongzhong YANG¹, Jinju WEI¹, Debin WEI³, Wenjiao LI³, Xihui LIU¹(), Hui ZHOU¹()

^1.Guangxi Key Laboratory of Sugarcane Genetic Improvement，Sugarcane Research Institute，Guangxi Academy of Agricultural Sciences，Nanning 530007，China
^2.Guangxi South Subtropical Agricultural Science Research Institute，Guangxi Chongzuo 532400，China
^3.Guangxi Baise Academy of Agricultural Sciences，Guangxi Baise 533612，China

Received:2023-03-16 Accepted:2023-09-16 Online:2024-07-15 Published:2024-07-12
Contact: Xihui LIU,Hui ZHOU

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

为了解干旱胁迫对甘蔗节间长度的影响，连续2年对国内外8个不同抗旱能力的甘蔗品种采用桶栽和大田种植，在人为控水和大田自然干旱胁迫条件下，于甘蔗收获期调查甘蔗株高、茎径及节间长度。结果表明，在桶栽人为控水条件下，干旱导致88%的甘蔗品种株高变矮；受干旱控水、复水影响，甘蔗茎径呈先变小后增大的趋势（+13~+6节茎径），节间长度明显变短后再增长。在自然干旱水分胁迫下，2个试验基地 8个甘蔗品种2年的株高为2.7~3.4 m；受干旱气候及其他条件影响，株高相对理想的甘蔗品种为‘ROC1’‘ROC22’‘GT21’和‘CP80-1827’。同人为控水相比，自然干旱导致甘蔗茎径变小，最细节出现在+7叶茎；节间长度变短，最短节出现在+8和+9叶茎。在人为控水干旱条件下，抗旱性较强的甘蔗品种节间旱胁迫指数和节间旱胁迫恢复指数相对较高。在大田自然干旱条件下，抗旱性较强的甘蔗品种表现为相对较高的节间旱胁迫指数和较低的节间旱胁迫恢复指数。从恢复指数来看，干旱复水后的正常节间长度均大于干旱前的正常节间长度，表明适度的干旱刺激了甘蔗生长。总体来说，水分胁迫导致甘蔗株高变矮、茎径变小、节间长度变短，节间旱胁迫指数和节间旱胁迫恢复指数可作为甘蔗茎节应对干旱胁迫的指标，以此来评价甘蔗品种的抗旱性具有一定的参考价值。甘蔗的抗旱性研究不能完全依赖人为控水的模拟干旱，其抗旱能力的整体评价需要围绕大田自然干旱开展。

关键词: 甘蔗, 干旱胁迫, 茎节

Abstract:

In order to understand the effect of water stress on the internode length of sugarcane， 8 sugarcane varieties developed home and abroad with different drought tolerance were planted in barrels and in fields. Under the conditions of artificial water stress and natural rain-fed condition in fields， the plant height， stalk diameter and internode length of sugarcane were investigated during the harvest period. The results showed that， under the conditions of artificial water stress， drought caused 88% of sugarcane varieties to grow shorter， and the stem diameter of sugarcane decreased first and then increased （stem diameter of +13~+6 node） due to the artificial water stress and rehydration， and the internode length became significantly shorter and then increased. Under natural rain-fed condition infields， the plant heights of 8 sugarcane varieties in 2 test bases were 2.7~3.4 m in 2 years. Influenced by drought climate and other conditions， the relatively ideal sugarcane varieties judged by plant height were ‘ROC1’ ‘ROC22’ ‘GT21’ and ‘CP80-1827’. Compared with artifical water stress， natural drought led to the reduction of sugarcane stem diameter with the most details in +7 leaf stems， the internode length becomed shorter and the shortest internode appeared in +8 and +9 leaf stems. Under the conditions of artificial water stress， the varieties with strong drought tolerance showed the high internode water stress index （IWSI）and internode water stress recovery index （IWSRI）. While the varieties with strong drought tolerance showed the high IWSI and low IWSRI under natural rain-fed conditions in fields. In terms of recovery index， the normal internode length after drought rewatering was longer than that before drought， which showed that the moderate drought stimulated the growth of sugarcane. In general， water stress leaded to shorter plant height， smaller stem diameter and shorter internode length of sugarcane. The IWSI and IWSRI could be used to understand the growth difference of different sugarcane varieties stem nodes in response to water stress， and they could be as indexes to evaluate the drought tolerance of sugarcane varieties under drought conditions. The research on sugarcane drought tolerance could not completely rely on artificial water control to simulate drought， and the breakthrough research on sugarcane drought tolerance should focus on natural drought in field.

Key words: sugarcane, water stress, stem nodes

中图分类号:

S566.1

桂意云, 李海碧, 梁强, 杨荣仲, 韦金菊, 韦德斌, 李文教, 刘昔辉, 周会. 基于人为控水和自然水分胁迫下的甘蔗茎节生长变化[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2024, 26(7): 25-36.

Yiyun GUI, Haibi LI, Qiang LIANG, Rongzhong YANG, Jinju WEI, Debin WEI, Wenjiao LI, Xihui LIU, Hui ZHOU. Changes of Sugarcane Stem Node Growth Under Artificial Water Control and Natural Water Stress[J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2024, 26(7): 25-36.

图/表 8

参考文献 28

1	李鸿博,蔡伟俊,谢雨彤,等.甘蔗新品系对干旱胁迫的生理响应及抗旱性评价[J].华南农业大学学报,2019,40(6):51-58.
	LI H B, CAI W J, XIE Y T, et al.. Physiological responses of new sugarcane lines to drought stress and evaluation of their drought resitances [J]. J. South Chin. Agric. Univ., 2019, 40(6):51-58.
2	TRUNG D T,李健,张风娟,等.干旱胁迫下不同甘蔗品种叶片抗氧化酶活性和渗透调节物质含量的变化[J].热带作物学报,2018,39(5):858-866.
	TRUNG D T, LI J, ZHANG F J, et al.. Changes of antioxidant enzyme activities and contents of osmotic regulation substances in leaves of different sugarcane varieties under drought stress [J]. Chin. J. Trop. Crops, 2018, 39(5):858-866.
3	刘家勇,陈学宽,夏红明,等.干旱胁迫下气温对甘蔗叶绿素荧光动力学参数的影响[J].西南农业学报,2018,31(3):478-482.
	LIU J Y, CHEN X K, XIA H M, et al.. Effect of air temperature on chlorophyll fluorescence of sugarcane (Saccharum spp.) under water stress condition [J]. Southwest China J. Agric. Sci., 2018, 31(3):478-482.
4	MISRA V, SOLOMON S, MALL A K, et al.. Morphological assessment of water stressed sugarcane: a comparison of waterlogged and drought affected crop [J]. Saudo J. Bio. Sci., 2020, 27(5):1228-1236.
5	SILVA M A, SILVA J A G, JENCISO, et al.. Yield components as indicators of drought tolerance of sugarcane [J]. Sci. Agric., 2008, 65(6):620-627.
6	JANGPROMMA N, THAMMASIRIRAK S, JAISIL P, et al.. Effects of drought and recovery from drought stress on above ground and root growth, and water use efficiency in sugarcane (Saccharum officinarum L.) [J]. Aust. J. Crop Sci., 2012, 6(8):1298-1304.
7	GOMATHI R, KRISHNAPRIYA V, ARUNKUMAR R, et al.. Physiological traits imparting　drought stress tolerance to promising sugarcane (Saccharum spp.) clones [J]. Plant Physiol. Rep., 2020, 25(3):509-515.
8	DEVI K, GOMATHI R, ARUN K R, et al.. Field tolerance and recovery potential of sugarcane varieties subjected to drought [J]. Indan J. Plant Physiol., 2018, 23(2):271-282.
9	INMAN-BAMBER N G. Sugarcane water stress criteria for irrigation and drying off [J]. Field Crop. Res., 2004, 89(1):107-122.
10	陆国盈,韩世健,杨培忠,等.甘蔗伸长中后期干旱胁迫对产量和工艺品质的影响效应[J].广西蔗糖,2002(4):3-7.
	LU G Y, HAN S J, YANG P Z, et al.. Effect of drought stress on yield and craft quality of sugarcane in middle and late elongation [J]. Guangxi Sugarcane Canesugar, 2002(4):3-7.
11	李健,农艳丰.干旱胁迫对2个甘蔗品种生长和生理生化特性的影响[J].安徽农学通报,2018,24(12):25-28.
	LI J, NONG Y F. Effects of drought stress on growth, physiological and biochemical characteristics of two sugar-cane varieties [J]. Anhui Agric. Sci. Bull., 2018, 24(12):25-28.
12	陈燕丽,蒙良莉,黄肖寒,等.基于SPEI的广西甘蔗生育期干旱时空演变特征分析[J].农业工程学报,2019,35(14):149-158.
	CHEN Y L, MENG L L, HUANG X H, et al.. Spatial and temporal evolution characteristics of drought in Guangxi during sugarcane growth period based on SPEI [J]. Trans. Chin. Soc. Agric. Eng., 2019, 35(14):149-158.
13	刘三梅,杨清辉,李秀年,等.不同生育时期干旱胁迫对甘蔗形态指标及生理特性的影响[J].南方农业科学,2016,47(8):1273-1278.
	LIU S M, YANG Q H, LI X N, et al.. Effects of drought stress on morphological index and physiological characteristics of sugarcane at different growth stages [J]. J. Southern Agric., 2016, 47(8):1273-1278.
14	KHONGHINTAISONG J, SONGSRI P, JONGRUNGKLANG N. Understanding growth rate patterns among different drought resistant sugarcane cultivars during plant and ratoon crops encountered water deficit at early growth stage under natural field conditions [J/OL]. Agron. J., 2021, 11(10):2083 [2023-02-10]. .
15	GOMATHI R, KRISHNAPRIYA V, ARUNKUMAR R, et al.. Physiological traits imparting drought stress tolerance to promising sugarcane (Saccharum spp.) clones [J]. Plant Physiol. Rep., 2020, 25(3):509-515.
16	覃纹,黄秋燕,覃志豪,等.广西糖料蔗种植区干旱遥感时空分析[J].自然资源遥感,2022,34(2):261-270.
	QIN W, HUANG Q Y, QIN Z H, et al.. Spatiotemporal analysis of drought in sugarcane planting areas of Guangxi by remote sensing [J]. Remote Sens. Nat. Resour., 2022, 34(2):261-270.
17	陈海波,李就好,余长洪,等.基于茎直径变化的甘蔗水分亏缺诊断指标确定[J].农业工程学报,2014,30(19):115-122.
	CHEN H B, LI J H, YU C H, et al.. Rational indicators for water deficiency diagnosis of sugarcane based on stem diameter variations [J]. Trans. Chin. Soc. Agric. Eng., 2014, 30(19):115-122.
18	黄维,姚裕群,段居琦,等.1961—2020年广西甘蔗干旱的时空变化特征分析[J].西南农业学报,2022,35(5):1193-1210.
	HUANG W, YAO Y Q, DUAN J Q, et al.. Temporal and spatial characteristic of sugarcane drought in Guangxi during 1961—2020 [J]. Southwest China J. Agric. Sci., 2022, 35(5):1193-1210.
19	高燕俐,刘小刚,冷险险,等.基于主成分分析的广西省干旱时空格局[J].生态学报,2020,40(16):5591-5601.
	GAO Y L, LIU X G, LENG X X, et al.. Spatio-temporal drought patterns in Guangxi province based on principal component analysis [J]. Acta Ecol. Sin., 2020, 40(16):5591-5601.
20	李海碧,桂意云,张荣华,等.甘蔗抗旱性及抗旱育种研究进展[J].分子植物育种,2019,17(10):3406-3415.
	LI H B, GUI Y Y, ZHANG R H, et al.. Research progress on drought resistance and drought-resistant breeding of Sugarcane [J]. Mol. Plant Breeding, 2019, 17(10):3406-3415.
21	沈先岳,徐荣,吴清莲,等.甘蔗与蔗茅杂交亲本及后代材料的抗旱性鉴定[J].中国农学通报,2020,36(20):7-3.
	SHEN X Y, XU R, WU Q L, et al.. Saccharum spp.×Erianthus fulvus and their hybrid offspring: identification of drought resistance [J]. Chin. Agric. Sci. Bull., 2020, 36(20):7-3.
22	桂意云,杨荣仲,周会.干旱及复水条件下甘蔗的生理响应与抗旱性简易鉴定[J].广东农业科学,2009(9):19-21.
	GUI Y Y, YANG R Z, ZHOU H. Physiological response of sugarcane in different water stress and water recovery condition and drought-resistance identification [J]. Guangdong Agric. Sci., 2009(9):19-21.
23	陈义强,邓祖湖,郭春芳,等.甘蔗常用亲本及其衍生品种的抗旱性评价[J].中国农业科学,2007,40(6):1108-1117.
	CHEN Y Q, DENG Z H, GUO C F, et al.. Drought resistant evaluations of commonly used parents and their derived varieties [J]. Sci. Agric. Sin., 2007, 40(6):1108-1117.
24	HEMAPRABHA G, SWAPNA S, LAVANYA D L, et al.. Evaluation of drought tolerance potential of elite genotypes and progenies of sugarcane (Saccharum sp. hybrids) [J]. Sugar Technol., 2013, 15(1):9-16.
25	殷世航,周赛,黄霄宇,等.中蔗系列新品种对干旱胁迫的相应及抗旱性评价[J].南方农业学报,2020,51(6):1139-1345.
	YIN S H, ZHOU S, HUANG X Y, et al.. Physiological response and evaluation of sugarcane Zhongzhe varieties to drought stress [J]. J. Southern Agric., 2020, 51(6):1139-1345.
26	陈海波,李就好,余长洪.水分胁迫条件下甘蔗茎直径变化机理和监测方法[J].中国农村水利水电,2016(1):68-70.
	CHEN H B, LI J H, YU C H. Mechanism and monitoring methodology of sugarcane stem diameter variation under water stress [J]. China Rural Water Hydropower, 2016(1): 68-70.
27	刘硕,樊仙,全怡吉,等.干旱胁迫对甘蔗光合生理特性的影响[J].西南农业学报,2022,35(8):1776-1785.
	LIU S, PAN X, QUAN Y J, et al.. Effects of drought stress on photosynthetic and physiological characteristics of sugarcane [J]. Southwest China J. Agric. Sci., 2022, 35(8):1776-1785.
28	唐建,冯娟,刘云飞.作物干旱复水补偿效应研究[J].湖北农业科学,2021,60(1):10-13.
	TANG J, FENG J, LIU Y F. Study on compensation effect of crop rewatering for drought [J]. Hubei Agric. Sci., 2021, 60(1):10-13.

品种Variety	处理Treatment	节Node								平均Mean
品种Variety	处理Treatment	+6	+7	+8	+9	+10	+11	+12	+13	平均Mean
ROC1	CK	3.29±0.12 a	3.35±0.08 a	3.41±0.08 a	3.47±0.04 a	3.52±0.07 a	3.51±0.10 a	3.47±0.14 a	3.41±0.15 a	3.43±0.08 b
ROC1	T	3.23±0.08 a	3.34±0.11 a	3.32±0.11 a	3.21±0.13 a	3.11±0.12 b	3.12±0.11 b	3.28±0.15 a	3.32±0.21 a	3.24±0.09 a
ROC22	CK	3.04±0.22 a	3.03±0.14 a	3.02±0.18 a	3.07±0.17 a	3.12±0.17 a	3.19±0.10 a	3.16±0.08 a	3.17±0.07 a	3.10±0.07 a
ROC22	T	3.12±0.06 a	3.18±0.09 a	3.23±0.17 a	3.10±0.21 a	2.89±0.17 b	2.98±0.06 b	3.13±0.15 a	3.17±0.19 a	3.10±0.11 a
GT21	CK	2.99±0.07 a	3.04±0.07 a	3.08±0.08 a	3.14±0.07 a	3.16±0.08 a	3.19±0.03 a	3.11±0.05 a	3.11±0.05 a	3.10±0.06 a
GT21	T	2.99±0.14 a	3.12±0.15 a	3.12±0.17 a	3.07±0.20 a	3.01±0.20 a	2.90±0.21 b	2.93±0.13 a	2.93±0.15 a	3.01±0.09 b
GT29	CK	2.73±0.07 a	2.74±0.09 a	2.79±0.10 a	2.85±0.11 a	2.84±0.13 a	2.80±0.12 a	2.80±0.12 a	2.71±0.18 a	2.78±0.05 a
GT29	T	2.72±0.20 a	2.76±0.20 a	2.65±0.17 a	2.56±0.12 b	2.65±0.18 a	2.74±0.16 a	2.71±0.19 a	2.65±0.24 a	2.68±0.06 b
YZ89-159	CK	2.72±0.17 a	2.68±0.17 a	2.72±0.15 a	2.72±0.13 a	2.68±0.12 a	2.60±0.15 a	2.55±0.13 a	2.51±0.11 a	2.65±0.08 a
YZ89-159	T	2.90±0.27 a	2.83±0.44 a	2.69±0.49 a	2.73±0.38 a	2.73±0.35 a	2.76±0.49 a	2.67±0.51 a	2.64±0.43 a	2.74±0.08 a
LC03-182	CK	2.71±0.02 a	2.75±0.05 a	2.87±0.07 a	2.94±0.08 a	3.05±0.07 a	3.03±0.04 a	3.00±0.04 a	2.96±0.05 a	2.91±0.12 a
LC03-182	T	2.95±0.09 a	3.04±0.08 a	2.92±0.09 a	2.76±0.06 b	2.93±0.07 a	3.09±0.10 a	3.05±0.08 a	2.92±0.09 a	2.96±0.10 a
CP72-1210	CK	3.24±0.04 a	3.29±0.08 a	3.24±0.09 a	3.31±0.06 a	3.35±0.09 a	3.33±0.13 a	3.24±0.20 a	3.22±0.21 a	3.28±0.05 a
CP72-1210	T	3.45±0.31 a	3.52±0.33 a	3.49±0.32 a	3.24±0.17 a	3.29±0.16 a	3.36±0.22 a	3.38±0.16 a	3.33±0.20 a	3.38±0.10 a
CP80-1827	CK	2.91±0.08 a	2.93±0.09 a	3.01±0.12 a	3.07±0.11 a	3.09±0.15 a	2.98±0.11 a	2.94±0.16 a	2.73±0.15 a	2.96±0.11 a
CP80-1827	T	3.05±0.16 a	3.13±0.22 a	3.03±0.25 a	2.93±0.27 a	2.96±0.15 a	3.02±0.13 a	2.95±0.20 a	2.82±0.22 a	2.99±0.09 a

品种Variety	处理Treatment	节Node								平均Mean
品种Variety	处理Treatment	+6	+7	+8	+9	+10	+11	+12	+13	平均Mean
ROC1	CK	3.29±0.12 a	3.35±0.08 a	3.41±0.08 a	3.47±0.04 a	3.52±0.07 a	3.51±0.10 a	3.47±0.14 a	3.41±0.15 a	3.43±0.08 b
ROC1	T	3.23±0.08 a	3.34±0.11 a	3.32±0.11 a	3.21±0.13 a	3.11±0.12 b	3.12±0.11 b	3.28±0.15 a	3.32±0.21 a	3.24±0.09 a
ROC22	CK	3.04±0.22 a	3.03±0.14 a	3.02±0.18 a	3.07±0.17 a	3.12±0.17 a	3.19±0.10 a	3.16±0.08 a	3.17±0.07 a	3.10±0.07 a
ROC22	T	3.12±0.06 a	3.18±0.09 a	3.23±0.17 a	3.10±0.21 a	2.89±0.17 b	2.98±0.06 b	3.13±0.15 a	3.17±0.19 a	3.10±0.11 a
GT21	CK	2.99±0.07 a	3.04±0.07 a	3.08±0.08 a	3.14±0.07 a	3.16±0.08 a	3.19±0.03 a	3.11±0.05 a	3.11±0.05 a	3.10±0.06 a
GT21	T	2.99±0.14 a	3.12±0.15 a	3.12±0.17 a	3.07±0.20 a	3.01±0.20 a	2.90±0.21 b	2.93±0.13 a	2.93±0.15 a	3.01±0.09 b
GT29	CK	2.73±0.07 a	2.74±0.09 a	2.79±0.10 a	2.85±0.11 a	2.84±0.13 a	2.80±0.12 a	2.80±0.12 a	2.71±0.18 a	2.78±0.05 a
GT29	T	2.72±0.20 a	2.76±0.20 a	2.65±0.17 a	2.56±0.12 b	2.65±0.18 a	2.74±0.16 a	2.71±0.19 a	2.65±0.24 a	2.68±0.06 b
YZ89-159	CK	2.72±0.17 a	2.68±0.17 a	2.72±0.15 a	2.72±0.13 a	2.68±0.12 a	2.60±0.15 a	2.55±0.13 a	2.51±0.11 a	2.65±0.08 a
YZ89-159	T	2.90±0.27 a	2.83±0.44 a	2.69±0.49 a	2.73±0.38 a	2.73±0.35 a	2.76±0.49 a	2.67±0.51 a	2.64±0.43 a	2.74±0.08 a
LC03-182	CK	2.71±0.02 a	2.75±0.05 a	2.87±0.07 a	2.94±0.08 a	3.05±0.07 a	3.03±0.04 a	3.00±0.04 a	2.96±0.05 a	2.91±0.12 a
LC03-182	T	2.95±0.09 a	3.04±0.08 a	2.92±0.09 a	2.76±0.06 b	2.93±0.07 a	3.09±0.10 a	3.05±0.08 a	2.92±0.09 a	2.96±0.10 a
CP72-1210	CK	3.24±0.04 a	3.29±0.08 a	3.24±0.09 a	3.31±0.06 a	3.35±0.09 a	3.33±0.13 a	3.24±0.20 a	3.22±0.21 a	3.28±0.05 a
CP72-1210	T	3.45±0.31 a	3.52±0.33 a	3.49±0.32 a	3.24±0.17 a	3.29±0.16 a	3.36±0.22 a	3.38±0.16 a	3.33±0.20 a	3.38±0.10 a
CP80-1827	CK	2.91±0.08 a	2.93±0.09 a	3.01±0.12 a	3.07±0.11 a	3.09±0.15 a	2.98±0.11 a	2.94±0.16 a	2.73±0.15 a	2.96±0.11 a
CP80-1827	T	3.05±0.16 a	3.13±0.22 a	3.03±0.25 a	2.93±0.27 a	2.96±0.15 a	3.02±0.13 a	2.95±0.20 a	2.82±0.22 a	2.99±0.09 a

品种 Variety	处理Treatment	节Node								平均Mean
品种 Variety	处理Treatment	+6	+7	+8	+9	+10	+11	+12	+13	平均Mean
ROC1	CK	10.42±1.81 a	11.89±1.66 a	12.50±0.61 a	12.13±1.02 a	12.18±1.07 a	12.63±0.53 a	12.44±0.23 a	11.99±0.30 b	12.02±0.74 a
ROC1	T	8.86±0.32 a	8.20±0.35 b	7.22±0.39 b	6.78±0.37 b	8.66±0.06 b	10.73±0.39 b	12.21±0.19 a	12.79±0.26 a	9.43±0.09 b
ROC22	CK	11.37±0.22 a	12.05±1.36 a	12.05±0.66 a	10.52±0.94 a	9.98±0.22 a	10.17±0.45 a	11.22±0.36 a	12.07±0.14 a	11.18±0.28 a
ROC22	T	11.46±0.35 a	10.19±0.29 a	6.58±1.37 b	7.34±2.03 a	10.52±0.77 a	11.16±2.42 a	12.12±2.66 a	12.86±1.65 a	10.28±1.36 a
GT21	CK	10.44±0.52 a	10.85±1.38 a	11.38±1.54 a	10.59±1.48 a	10.18±1.55 a	10.10±0.98 a	10.47±1.07 a	10.39±0.93 a	10.55±1.14 a
GT21	T	9.19±0.62 a	8.37±0.93 a	7.37±0.91 b	5.53±1.17 b	7.12±1.35 a	9.20±1.42 a	10.43±1.02 a	11.34±0.94 a	8.57±0.38 b
GT29	CK	11.87±0.78 a	14.45±1.23 a	14.47±1.28 a	13.54±1.22 a	13.07±0.38 a	13.22±0.14 b	12.60±0.73 a	11.59±1.28 a	13.10±0.69 a
GT29	T	12.52±0.68 a	10.46±0.52 b	9.39±0.29 b	11.71±1.08 a	13.66±0.82 a	14.77±0.19 a	13.61±0.74 a	11.40±1.45 a	12.19±0.45 a
YZ89-159	CK	11.45±1.09 a	11.25±1.53 a	9.70±1.51 a	9.90±0.84 a	10.79±1.15 a	11.52±1.47 a	12.21±1.10 a	12.29±1.78 a	11.14±1.25 a
YZ89-159	T	10.53±0.47 a	8.02±0.60 b	8.60±2.09 a	11.03±2.24 a	12.60±2.30 a	13.32±2.03 a	14.06±1.35 a	13.84±0.73 a	11.50±1.45 a
LC03-1210	CK	13.77±0.90 a	15.45±0.99 a	14.98±0.02 a	14.36±0.05 a	13.99±0.32 a	13.40±0.64 a	13.41±1.02 a	12.96±0.81 a	14.04±0.31 a
LC03-1210	T	12.94±1.60 a	11.7±1.84 b	10.51±1.14 b	12.86±0.76 b	13.70±0.51 a	14.29±0.49 a	13.51±0.84 a	13.46±0.75 a	12.87±0.78 a
CP72-1210	CK	11.20±2.12 a	10.73±1.06 a	11.43±0.60 a	10.34±0.73 a	8.96±0.37 a	8.55±0.23 b	9.44±0.92 a	10.15±0.90 a	10.10±0.30 a
CP72-1210	T	10.35±1.30 a	8.52±1.02 a	6.37±1.75 b	7.67±1.25 b	9.02±1.44 a	10.05±0.14 a	10.68±0.41 a	10.29±0.38 a	9.12±0.88 a
CP80-1827	CK	13.56±1.16 a	15.31±1.52 a	14.54±0.94 a	12.62±0.82 a	11.33±1.00 a	12.08±0.93 a	11.65±0.62 a	11.18±0.67 a	12.79±0.82 a
CP80-1827	T	11.92±0.49 a	9.82±1.57 b	9.54±1.18 b	10.51±1.00 b	11.26±1.47 a	11.47±0.75 a	11.53±0.24 a	12.14±0.93 a	11.03±0.39 b

品种 Variety	处理Treatment	节Node								平均Mean
品种 Variety	处理Treatment	+6	+7	+8	+9	+10	+11	+12	+13	平均Mean
ROC1	CK	10.42±1.81 a	11.89±1.66 a	12.50±0.61 a	12.13±1.02 a	12.18±1.07 a	12.63±0.53 a	12.44±0.23 a	11.99±0.30 b	12.02±0.74 a
ROC1	T	8.86±0.32 a	8.20±0.35 b	7.22±0.39 b	6.78±0.37 b	8.66±0.06 b	10.73±0.39 b	12.21±0.19 a	12.79±0.26 a	9.43±0.09 b
ROC22	CK	11.37±0.22 a	12.05±1.36 a	12.05±0.66 a	10.52±0.94 a	9.98±0.22 a	10.17±0.45 a	11.22±0.36 a	12.07±0.14 a	11.18±0.28 a
ROC22	T	11.46±0.35 a	10.19±0.29 a	6.58±1.37 b	7.34±2.03 a	10.52±0.77 a	11.16±2.42 a	12.12±2.66 a	12.86±1.65 a	10.28±1.36 a
GT21	CK	10.44±0.52 a	10.85±1.38 a	11.38±1.54 a	10.59±1.48 a	10.18±1.55 a	10.10±0.98 a	10.47±1.07 a	10.39±0.93 a	10.55±1.14 a
GT21	T	9.19±0.62 a	8.37±0.93 a	7.37±0.91 b	5.53±1.17 b	7.12±1.35 a	9.20±1.42 a	10.43±1.02 a	11.34±0.94 a	8.57±0.38 b
GT29	CK	11.87±0.78 a	14.45±1.23 a	14.47±1.28 a	13.54±1.22 a	13.07±0.38 a	13.22±0.14 b	12.60±0.73 a	11.59±1.28 a	13.10±0.69 a
GT29	T	12.52±0.68 a	10.46±0.52 b	9.39±0.29 b	11.71±1.08 a	13.66±0.82 a	14.77±0.19 a	13.61±0.74 a	11.40±1.45 a	12.19±0.45 a
YZ89-159	CK	11.45±1.09 a	11.25±1.53 a	9.70±1.51 a	9.90±0.84 a	10.79±1.15 a	11.52±1.47 a	12.21±1.10 a	12.29±1.78 a	11.14±1.25 a
YZ89-159	T	10.53±0.47 a	8.02±0.60 b	8.60±2.09 a	11.03±2.24 a	12.60±2.30 a	13.32±2.03 a	14.06±1.35 a	13.84±0.73 a	11.50±1.45 a
LC03-1210	CK	13.77±0.90 a	15.45±0.99 a	14.98±0.02 a	14.36±0.05 a	13.99±0.32 a	13.40±0.64 a	13.41±1.02 a	12.96±0.81 a	14.04±0.31 a
LC03-1210	T	12.94±1.60 a	11.7±1.84 b	10.51±1.14 b	12.86±0.76 b	13.70±0.51 a	14.29±0.49 a	13.51±0.84 a	13.46±0.75 a	12.87±0.78 a
CP72-1210	CK	11.20±2.12 a	10.73±1.06 a	11.43±0.60 a	10.34±0.73 a	8.96±0.37 a	8.55±0.23 b	9.44±0.92 a	10.15±0.90 a	10.10±0.30 a
CP72-1210	T	10.35±1.30 a	8.52±1.02 a	6.37±1.75 b	7.67±1.25 b	9.02±1.44 a	10.05±0.14 a	10.68±0.41 a	10.29±0.38 a	9.12±0.88 a
CP80-1827	CK	13.56±1.16 a	15.31±1.52 a	14.54±0.94 a	12.62±0.82 a	11.33±1.00 a	12.08±0.93 a	11.65±0.62 a	11.18±0.67 a	12.79±0.82 a
CP80-1827	T	11.92±0.49 a	9.82±1.57 b	9.54±1.18 b	10.51±1.00 b	11.26±1.47 a	11.47±0.75 a	11.53±0.24 a	12.14±0.93 a	11.03±0.39 b

品种Variety	节间旱胁迫指数IWSI/%	节间旱胁迫恢复指数IWSRI/%
ROC1	47.01±1.14 ab	34.67±4.45 bc
ROC22	50.44±3.17 a	77.37±14.27 ab
GT21	50.56±7.62 a	64.36±10.84 abc
GT29	30.89±2.40 bc	74.46±3.85 abc
YZ89-159	40.26±6.07 abc	31.00±14.22 c
LC03-182	25.11±2.98 c	70.73±14.42 abc
CP72-1210	40.41±9.23 abc	102.53±22.40 a
CP80-1827	24.52±3.50 c	91.65±12.83 a

基于人为控水和自然水分胁迫下的甘蔗茎节生长变化

Changes of Sugarcane Stem Node Growth Under Artificial Water Control and Natural Water Stress

RichHTML

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 8

参考文献 28

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

品种Variety	地区 District	类型Type	节Node								平均Mean
品种Variety	地区 District	类型Type	+6	+7	+8	+9	+10	+11	+12	+13	平均Mean
ROC1	南宁 Nanning	新植 Plant	2.93±0.21 a	2.84±0.19 a	2.76±0.23 a	2.7±0.36 a	2.62±0.27 a	2.70±0.37 a	2.67±0.29 a	2.62±0.22 a	2.73±0.22 a
	南宁 Nanning	宿根 Ratoon	2.66±0.37 b	2.54±0.35 b	2.50±0.32 b	2.43±0.34 a	2.48±0.34 a	2.46±0.31 a	2.53±0.28 a	2.52±0.25 a	2.51±0.30 b
	百色Baise	新植 Plant	2.44±0.34 b	2.37±0.29 b	2.48±0.27 b	2.60±0.27 b	2.59±0.29 b	2.61±0.28 b	2.61±0.30 b	2.61±0.29 b	2.54±0.27 b
	百色Baise	宿根 Ratoon	2.83±0.19 a	2.74±0.19 a	3.01±0.12 a	3.18±0.16 a	3.15±0.20 a	3.07±0.22 a	3.04±0.19 a	3.07±0.18 a	3.01±0.17 a
ROC22	南宁 Nanning	新植 Plant	2.82±0.22 a	2.72±0.19 a	2.80±0.35 a	2.94±0.38 a	2.86±0.34 a	2.83±0.35 a	2.83±0.34 a	2.92±0.42 a	2.84±0.29 a
	南宁 Nanning	宿根 Ratoon	2.88±0.34 a	2.80±0.41 a	2.87±0.36 a	3.04±0.36 a	2.94±0.34 a	2.93±0.35 a	2.91±0.24 a	2.98±0.27 a	2.92±0.29 a
	百色Baise	新植 Plant	2.60±0.27 a	2.60±0.28 a	2.70±0.46 a	2.87±0.32 a	2.94±0.30 a	2.86±0.28 a	2.80±0.33 a	2.78±0.31 a	2.77±0.26 a
	百色Baise	宿根 Ratoon	2.40±0.26 b	2.38±0.27 b	2.58±0.28 a	2.45±0.33 b	2.45±0.17 b	2.56±0.31 b	2.57±0.29 b	2.58±0.35 a	2.50±0.21 b
GT21	南宁 Nanning	新植 Plant	2.78±0.27 b	2.64±0.27 b	2.70±0.25 b	2.79±0.31 b	2.84±0.33 b	2.83±0.33 b	2.80±0.28 b	2.78±0.28 b	2.77±0.27 b
	南宁 Nanning	宿根 Ratoon	3.13±0.33 a	3.00±0.34 a	3.01±0.31 a	3.15±0.31 a	3.18±0.34 a	3.18±0.38 a	3.15±0.37 a	3.17±0.35 a	3.12±0.34 a
	百色Baise	新植 Plant	2.72±0.31 a	2.60±0.27 b	2.75±0.33 b	2.88±0.35 b	3.01±0.38 a	2.94±0.34 a	2.92±0.30 a	2.88±0.32 a	2.84±0.28 b
	百色Baise	宿根 Ratoon	2.71±0.15 a	2.81±0.15 a	3.12±0.14 a	3.18±0.18 a	3.14±0.21 a	3.06±0.14 a	3.01±0.15 a	2.94±0.15 a	3.00±0.13 a
GT29	南宁 Nanning	新植 Plant	2.98±0.18 a	2.79±0.17 a	2.89±0.21 a	3.03±0.29 a	2.95±0.25 a	2.94±0.22 a	2.98±0.29 a	2.97±0.27 a	2.94±0.21 a
	南宁 Nanning	宿根 Ratoon	2.82±0.28 a	2.66±0.25 a	2.81±0.41 a	2.94±0.39 a	2.86±0.31 a	2.83±0.27 a	2.82±0.24 a	2.84±0.21 a	2.82±0.26 a
	百色Baise	新植 Plant	2.66±0.26 a	2.53±0.24 a	2.75±0.27 a	2.87±0.22 a	2.88±0.23 a	2.91±0.20 a	2.83±0.23 a	2.81±0.21 a	2.78±0.20 a
	百色Baise	宿根 Ratoon	2.50±0.21 a	2.39±0.14 a	2.50±0.18 b	2.72±0.14 b	2.69±0.14 b	2.66±0.14 b	2.55±0.12 b	2.55±0.11 b	2.57±0.13 b
YZ89-159	南宁 Nanning	新植 Plant	2.70±0.31 a	2.71±0.29 a	2.64±0.24 a	2.74±0.23 a	2.80±0.24 a	2.79±0.26 a	2.79±0.23 a	2.87±0.39 a	2.75±0.23 a
	南宁 Nanning	宿根 Ratoon	2.56±0.43 a	2.51±0.37 a	2.51±0.36 a	2.57±0.36 a	2.62±0.34 a	2.66±0.28 a	2.70±0.34 a	2.71±0.35 a	2.60±0.34 a
	百色Baise	新植 Plant	2.34±0.22 a	2.22±0.26 a	2.38±0.26 a	2.60±0.25 a	2.56±0.21 a	2.57±0.21 a	2.63±0.22 a	2.61±0.26 a	2.49±0.21 a
	百色Baise	宿根 Ratoon	2.36±0.21 a	2.32±0.21 a	2.54±0.17 a	2.67±0.20 a	2.53±0.22 a	2.57±0.18 a	2.55±0.18 a	2.51±0.19 a	2.51±0.16 a
LC03-182	南宁 Nanning	新植 Plant	2.72±0.25 a	2.70±0.21 a	2.80±0.25 a	2.82±0.24 a	2.84±0.28 a	2.85±0.24 a	2.71±0.47 a	2.78±0.45 a	2.78±0.24 a
	南宁 Nanning	宿根 Ratoon	2.43±0.34 b	2.37±0.33 b	2.40±0.41 b	2.52±0.42 b	2.56±0.39 b	2.59±0.37 b	2.62±0.41 a	2.63±0.41 a	2.52±0.35 b
	百色Baise	新植 Plant	2.38±0.34 a	2.38±0.39 a	2.51±0.30 a	2.58±0.30 a	2.66±0.34 a	2.70±0.34 a	2.70±0.32 a	2.66±0.33 a	2.57±0.28 a
	百色Baise	宿根 Ratoon	2.29±0.27 a	2.36±0.27 a	2.57±0.34 a	2.64±0.37 a	2.63±0.23 a	2.57±0.22 a	2.52±0.25 a	2.53±0.28 a	2.51±0.25 a
CP72-1210	南宁 Nanning	新植 Plant	2.85±0.26 a	2.71±0.26 a	2.73±0.18 a	2.75±0.21 a	2.84±0.25 a	2.81±0.28 a	2.82±0.32 a	2.80±0.27 a	2.79±0.21 a
	南宁 Nanning	宿根 Ratoon	2.52±0.46 b	2.34±0.46 b	2.45±0.44 a	2.46±0.47 a	2.51±0.41 b	2.46±0.40 b	2.46±0.43 a	2.52±0.34 b	2.47±0.39 b
	百色Baise	新植 Plant	2.81±0.20 a	2.69±0.25 a	2.73±0.25 a	2.93±0.25 a	3.01±0.25 a	2.98±0.24 a	2.93±0.25 a	2.90±0.25 a	2.87±0.19 a
	百色Baise	宿根 Ratoon	2.72±0.26 a	2.71±0.30 a	2.67±0.34 a	2.61±0.28 b	2.65±0.24 b	2.78±0.16 b	2.79±0.21 a	2.80±0.26 a	2.72±0.20 b
CP80-1827	南宁 Nanning	新植 Plant	2.73±0.26 a	2.64±0.27 a	2.73±0.39 a	2.78±0.31 a	2.78±0.26 a	2.76±0.35 a	2.68±0.32 a	2.71±0.30 a	2.73±0.26 a
	南宁 Nanning	宿根 Ratoon	2.66±0.23 a	2.59±0.22 a	2.72±0.21 a	2.76±0.19 a	2.79±0.16 a	2.76±0.20 a	2.77±0.21 a	2.78±0.22 a	2.73±0.16 a
	百色Baise	新植 Plant	2.63±0.29 a	2.49±0.30 b	2.57±0.29 b	2.81±0.24 a	2.80±0.28 a	2.73±0.23 a	2.73±0.21 b	2.68±0.23 b	2.68±0.21 b
	百色Baise	宿根 Ratoon	2.80±0.17 a	2.82±0.16 a	2.99±0.16 a	2.72±0.23 a	2.71±0.17 a	2.73±0.20 a	2.98±0.31 a	3.07±0.22 a	2.85±0.17 a

品种Variety	地区District	类型 Type	节Node								平均值Mean
品种Variety	地区District	类型 Type	+6	+7	+8	+9	+10	+11	+12	+13	平均值Mean
ROC1	南宁 Nanning	新植 Plant	15.46±2.44 a	13.85±2.45 a	11.86±2.82 a	11.04±2.68 a	11.35±2.22 a	11.96±2.66 a	12.18±2.80 a	11.67±2.06 a	12.42±1.83 a
	南宁 Nanning	宿根 Ratoon	15.88±1.68 a	13.16±1.38 a	11.03±1.26 a	11.88±2.44 a	11.38±2.12 a	11.62±2.34 a	11.87±1.62 a	11.67±1.12 a	12.31±0.72 a
	百色 Baise	新植 Plant	15.32±1.69 a	14.05±2.13 a	11.47±1.90 a	11.58±1.98 a	12.77±2.5 a	13.35±1.90 a	13.01±2.24 a	13.23±1.88 a	13.10±1.10 a
	百色 Baise	宿根 Ratoon	13.85±1.52 b	13.16±1.00 a	9.70±1.00 b	9.62±1.26 b	11.36±2.00 a	13.27±1.83 a	13.50±1.17 a	13.17±1.40 a	12.20±0.94 b
ROC22	南宁 Nanning	新植 Plant	19.15±2.67 a	16.78±2.08 a	12.96±2.65 a	12.24±2.84 a	14.43±2.17 a	15.73±2.31 a	15.43±2.10 a	14.63±1.60 a	15.17±0.98 a
	南宁 Nanning	宿根 Ratoon	17.07±1.38 b	14.51±1.19 b	12.12±1.84 a	11.59±2.90 a	13.63±2.49 a	13.97±2.13 a	14.22±1.69 a	13.32±1.59 b	13.80±0.59 b
	百色 Baise	新植 Plant	13.70±1.83 b	12.68±1.92 b	11.30±2.43 a	11.21±1.91 b	12.26±2.84 b	13.62±2.58 a	14.06±2.21 a	13.94±2.12 a	12.85±1.64 b
	百色 Baise	宿根 Ratoon	15.46±1.48 a	14.02±1.20 a	12.05±1.18 a	13.95±2.31 a	14.65±2.45 a	13.48±3.17 a	13.58±2.01 a	14.85±2.46 a	14.01±1.02 a
GT21	南宁 Nanning	新植 Plant	16.16±1.63 a	14.14±2.16 a	10.87±1.94 a	9.87±1.76 a	11.31±1.79 a	12.65±2.45 a	12.90±1.44 a	13.04±1.91 a	12.62±1.14 a
	南宁 Nanning	宿根 Ratoon	13.98±1.39 b	12.25±1.63 b	9.75±1.61 a	8.36±0.71 b	8.94±1.54 b	10.23±1.52 b	10.65±1.63 b	10.53±0.95 b	10.58±0.90 b
	百色 Baise	新植 Plant	12.96±1.74 a	12.31±1.30 a	9.45±2.28 a	8.26±1.97 a	9.40±2.05 a	10.78±2.17 a	11.74±2.11 a	12.56±2.04 a	10.93±1.25 a
	百色 Baise	宿根 Ratoon	12.13±1.10 a	10.67±2.88 b	7.85±3.65 a	7.35±0.80 a	8.92±1.50 a	10.44±1.57 a	11.62±1.44 a	12.04±1.24 a	10.13±1.05 a
GT29	南宁 Nanning	新植 Plant	16.46±1.98 a	13.78±2.16 a	10.30±1.22 a	10.42±1.34 a	11.95±1.74 a	13.35±1.39 a	12.75±0.93 a	13.26±4.59 a	12.78±0.94 a
	南宁 Nanning	宿根 Ratoon	15.64±1.29 a	13.70±1.83 a	10.06±1.57 a	9.76±1.80 a	11.07±1.30 a	12.43±1.31 a	11.49±0.79 b	11.12±1.14 a	11.91±0.91 b
	百色 Baise	新植 Plant	13.38±1.71 b	11.57±1.56 b	8.57±1.32 a	9.10±2.13 a	10.47±1.85 a	11.65±1.42 a	12.28±1.43 a	12.10±1.73 a	11.14±0.84 b
	百色 Baise	宿根 Ratoon	14.73±1.42 a	13.08±1.00 a	9.07±0.74 a	9.28±1.15 a	10.81±1.55 a	12.25±1.49 a	13.01±1.45 a	12.55±1.21 a	11.85±0.93 a
YZ89-159	南宁 Nanning	新植 Plant	18.06±2.56 a	17.21±1.92 a	13.82±2.54 a	12.72±2.36 a	13.76±1.74 a	13.45±1.61 a	12.79±1.43 a	12.88±2.23 a	14.33±1.14 a
	南宁 Nanning	宿根 Ratoon	17.11±1.62 a	15.05±1.00 b	12.80±2.04 a	12.67±2.61 a	12.68±2.24 a	13.13±1.87 a	11.79±1.64 a	12.26±2.09 a	13.44±1.26 a
	百色 Baise	新植 Plant	14.95±2.29 a	14.65±2.06 a	10.36±0.89 a	10.78±1.64 a	11.96±1.73 a	12.44±1.47 a	12.53±1.14 a	12.96±1.56 a	12.58±1.06 a
	百色 Baise	宿根 Ratoon	14.62±1.59 a	12.13±1.09 b	9.10±0.77 b	10.18±1.04 a	11.71±0.91 a	12.16±0.82 a	12.08±0.53 a	12.36±0.90 a	11.79±0.66 b
LC03-182	南宁 Nanning	新植 Plant	19.44±1.32 a	16.87±2.97 a	13.43±2.84 a	12.49±2.24 a	14.04±1.46 a	13.40±2.74 a	12.46±3.01 a	12.06±1.60 a	14.27±1.00 a
	南宁 Nanning	宿根 Ratoon	15.83±2.22 b	14.22±2.43 b	11.71±1.89 a	10.63±2.55 a	11.62±3.57 b	13.79±2.74 a	13.18±2.70 a	12.59±2.05 a	12.95±1.81 b
	百色 Baise	新植 Plant	14.55±2.02 a	13.64±2.96 a	10.52±3.58 a	11.50±2.69 a	13.01±2.45 a	13.78±3.03 a	14.02±2.08 b	13.43±1.76 b	13.06±1.51 a
	百色 Baise	宿根 Ratoon	14.60±2.46 a	11.28±1.63 b	9.65±1.41 a	11.60±2.79 a	14.83±3.65 a	16.18±4.23 a	16.25±2.04 a	15.38±2.29 a	13.72±2.14 a
CP72-1210	南宁 Nanning	新植 Plant	16.56±1.80 a	14.72±1.58 a	11.60±1.81 a	10.88±2.47 a	11.41±2.64 a	11.92±2.14 a	11.61±1.94 a	11.45±1.83 a	12.52±1.20 a
	南宁 Nanning	宿根 Ratoon	14.14±1.37 b	12.37±1.24 b	11.34±1.60 a	11.95±1.79 a	12.44±2.03 a	11.99±3.33 a	11.73±3.40 a	10.88±2.34 a	12.11±1.50 a
	百色 Baise	新植 Plant	13.05±2.26 a	12.43±2.43 a	9.48±2.53 a	8.83±2.55 a	9.40±2.40 b	10.65±1.95 a	11.19±1.65 a	11.33±1.76 a	10.80±1.22 a
	百色 Baise	宿根 Ratoon	13.65±2.01 a	11.10±1.66 a	7.95±2.07 a	10.36±2.16 a	11.19±1.20 a	10.76±1.75 a	11.30±2.27 a	10.71±2.17 a	10.88±0.99 a
CP80-1827	南宁 Nanning	新植 Plant	16.27±2.62 a	14.63±2.05 a	11.49±2.26 a	11.26±2.69 a	13.14±2.31 a	13.08±1.89 a	12.81±1.22 a	13.05±1.93 a	13.22±1.36 a
	南宁 Nanning	宿根 Ratoon	15.22±2.36 a	13.60±1.67 a	10.91±1.13 a	11.09±1.71 a	12.26±1.84 a	12.32±1.50 a	11.81±1.76 a	11.58±1.34 b	12.35±1.13 a
	百色 Baise	新植 Plant	16.47±4.64 a	16.68±4.80 a	13.68±5.17 a	12.85±4.42 a	14.41±4.83 a	15.12±4.53 a	15.03±4.14 a	15.58±4.22 a	14.98±4.34 a
	百色 Baise	宿根 Ratoon	13.37±1.33 b	11.87±1.17 b	10.41±1.38 b	12.47±2.16 a	12.62±1.09 a	10.01±0.76 b	9.90±3.19 b	10.61±1.55 b	11.41±1.09 b

品种Variety	南宁新植蔗 Nanningplant crop		南宁宿根蔗 Nanning ratoon crop		百色新植蔗 Baise plant crop		百色宿根蔗 Baise ratoon crop
品种Variety	节间旱胁迫指数IWSI	节间旱胁迫恢复指数IWSRI	节间旱胁迫指数IWSI	节间旱胁迫恢复指数IWSRI	节间旱胁迫指数IWSI	节间旱胁迫恢复指数IWSRI	节间旱胁迫指数IWSI	节间旱胁迫恢复指数IWSRI
ROC1	23.50±2.24 bc	200.05±17.73 c	23.50±1.97 b	244.40±25.01 bc	26.53±1.15 cd	167.13±8.56 bc	34.70±1.56 bc	121.60±8.93 bcd
ROC22	31.60±2.82 a	195.35±25.14 c	32.30±2.68 a	150.50±12.25 c	31.90±1.74 bc	133.43±18.97 c	32.90±2.52 bc	111.80±12.03 cd
GT21	30.20±1.44 a	194.83±11.85 c	25.25±2.02 b	249.13±41.84 bc	38.03±2.04 a	150.10±11.15 bc	43.60±1.63 a	127.30±20.34 bcd
GT29	28.20±1.90 ab	209.55±30.80 bc	23.30±3.61 b	292.50±51.13 ab	35.43±1.98 ab	156.63±18.38 bc	34.10±1.43 bc	142.90±7.47 abc
YZ89-159	13.90±1.57 d	414.10±46.69 a	12.90±2.34 d	371.20±39.51 a	20.30±1.48 d	246.93±21.89 a	27.00±1.92 c	172.20±19.34 ab
LC03-182	21.70±2.68 c	295.80±42.52 b	22.13±1.59 bc	231.25±15.97 bc	36.65±2.92 a	176.91±35.57 bc	42.80±1.44 a	79.80±4.07 d
CP72-1210	23.90±1.55 bc	254.25±15.75 bc	15.70±1.52 cd	208.10±16.60 bc	34.87±3.06 ab	210.07±23.98 ab	36.60±5.89 ab	191.20±40.25 a
CP80-1827	22.53±1.68 bc	246.53±26.65 bc	16.40±1.98 cd	301.90±46.21 ab	26.23±2.35 cd	165.67±11.77 bc	27.40±1.19 c	133.20±7.67 bcd

[1]	何冯光, 陈自宏, 邓干然, 李腾辉, 周思理, 李国杰, 崔振德, 郑爽, 李玲, 覃双眉, 王翔, 杨少应, 周德强. 甘蔗收获机切割器入土切割深度监控系统设计与试验[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2024, 26(5): 101-109.
[2]	安东升, 严程明, 刘洋, 赵宝山, 孔冉, 苏俊波, 徐志军. 甘蔗间作系统生产力分析及适宜品种筛选[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2024, 26(4): 37-45.
[3]	魏茜雅, 林欣琪, 梁腊梅, 秦中维, 李映志. 褪黑素引发对干旱胁迫下辣椒种子萌发和幼苗生长的影响[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2024, 26(4): 46-57.
[4]	田蕊, 张华, 黄玫红, 邵振启, 李喜焕, 张彩英. 大豆抗旱遗传位点及候选基因发掘[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2023, 25(9): 69-82.
[5]	王艳成, 张纪月, 冯帅奇, 梁雪, 张振, 董微巍, 姬文秀. 外源促生菌联合有机肥对干旱胁迫下参地土壤性状及人参抗逆性影响[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2023, 25(8): 196-202.
[6]	王爽, 侯毅兴, 冯琳骄, 卢倩倩, 周龙. 干旱胁迫对鲜食葡萄叶片解剖结构的影响[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2023, 25(6): 40-49.
[7]	张一龙, 孙晓梵, 李硕, 李培英, 孙宗玖. 不同抗旱性狗牙根种质的抗旱生理响应差异分析[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2023, 25(6): 59-70.
[8]	陆青, 梁婷, 王伟伟, 汪德州, 吴娴, 王小燕, 唐益苗. 小麦热激蛋白基因TaHSP90-1的克隆与表达分析[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2022, 24(8): 44-54.
[9]	王莉莉, 殷丛培, 李峰, 杨志敏, 刘芳明, 林柏松, 刘晓静, 刘海军, 孙靖, 单东东, 崔江慧, 张振清. 马铃薯根际土壤细菌群落结构及其对干旱胁迫的响应[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2022, 24(6): 58-69.
[10]	王方玲, 张明月, 周亚茹, 管庆林, 李欣燕, 钟秋, 赵铭钦. 干旱胁迫下TS-PAA保水剂对雪茄烟生长发育和光合特性的影响[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2022, 24(4): 162-172.
[11]	李江艳, 张鲜花, 袁小强. 鸭茅种质资源苗期抗旱指标筛选及抗旱评价[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2022, 24(3): 84-94.
[12]	孙晓春, 黄文静, 李铂. 水杨酸对干旱胁迫下桔梗幼苗生理生化指标及相关基因表达的影响[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2022, 24(1): 63-70.
[13]	刘源, 张秀妍, 徐妙云, 郑红艳, 邹俊杰, 张兰, 王磊. 水稻干旱胁迫的small RNA转录组分析[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2021, 23(6): 23-32.
[14]	胡杨, 李钢铁, 李星, 贾守义. 干旱胁迫对细穗柽柳幼苗生长和生理生化指标的影响[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2021, 23(6): 43-50.
[15]	张豪洋,金伊楠,孙燕鑫,李子玮,郭笑恒,许自成*. 植物microRNAs在干旱胁迫响应中的研究进展[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2021, 23(4): 27-36.