中国农业科技导报 ›› 2025, Vol. 27 ›› Issue (2): 51-61.DOI: 10.13304/j.nykjdb.2023.0306
收稿日期:
2023-04-18
接受日期:
2023-07-11
出版日期:
2025-02-15
发布日期:
2025-02-14
通讯作者:
刘建国
作者简介:
王宁宁 E-mail:1483389320@qq.com;
基金资助:
Ningning WANG(), Xuemei LUO, Mingyuan CHEN, Rui GUO, Jianguo LIU(
)
Received:
2023-04-18
Accepted:
2023-07-11
Online:
2025-02-15
Published:
2025-02-14
Contact:
Jianguo LIU
摘要:
为探讨外源褪黑素对盐旱胁迫下油莎豆种子萌发和幼苗生长的缓解效应,采用0、50、100、150、200、250 μmol·L-1的褪黑素对油莎豆种子进行浸种引发处理,以200 mmol·L-1 NaCl溶液模拟盐胁迫、20% PEG-6000溶液模拟干旱胁迫,测定和分析不同处理下油莎豆种子的萌发、胚根和胚芽长度、生物量积累等指标。结果表明,200 mmol·L-1 NaCl胁迫、20% PEG-6000胁迫对油莎豆种子萌发和幼苗生长有显著抑制作用;50~150 μmol·L-1的褪黑素浸种对盐、旱胁迫下油莎豆种子的萌发和幼苗生长有促进作用,200~250 μmol·L-1的褪黑素浸种则抑制种子萌发和幼苗生长;盐旱复合胁迫加重了对油莎豆种子萌发和幼苗生长的危害程度,而外源褪黑素对油莎豆种子萌发指标、幼苗胚根和胚芽长度、植株干鲜重均有积极作用。综上所述,外源褪黑素对盐旱胁迫下油莎豆的种子萌发和幼苗生长有促进作用,其中150 μmol·L-1的褪黑素浸种对盐旱复合胁迫下种子萌发的缓解效果最佳,可有效减轻盐旱胁迫对种子萌发的负面效应。
中图分类号:
王宁宁, 罗雪梅, 陈明媛, 郭睿, 刘建国. 外源褪黑素对盐旱复合胁迫下油莎豆种子萌发和幼苗生长的影响[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2025, 27(2): 51-61.
Ningning WANG, Xuemei LUO, Mingyuan CHEN, Rui GUO, Jianguo LIU. Effects of Exogenous Melatonin on Seed Germination and Seedling Growth of Cyperusesculentus L. Under Salt and Drought Stress[J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2025, 27(2): 51-61.
处理 Treatment | 褪黑素含量 Melatonin content/( | 盐含量 Salt content/(mmol·L | PEG-6000含量 PEG-6000 content/% |
---|---|---|---|
CK | 0 | 0 | 0 |
S1 | 0 | 200 | 0 |
S2 | 50 | 200 | 0 |
S3 | 100 | 200 | 0 |
S4 | 150 | 200 | 0 |
S5 | 200 | 200 | 0 |
S6 | 250 | 200 | 0 |
D1 | 0 | 0 | 20 |
D2 | 50 | 0 | 20 |
D3 | 100 | 0 | 20 |
D4 | 150 | 0 | 20 |
D5 | 200 | 0 | 20 |
D6 | 250 | 0 | 20 |
SD1 | 0 | 200 | 20 |
SD2 | 50 | 200 | 20 |
SD3 | 100 | 200 | 20 |
SD4 | 150 | 200 | 20 |
SD5 | 200 | 200 | 20 |
SD6 | 250 | 200 | 20 |
表1 外源褪黑素与盐旱胁迫设计
Table 1 Exogenous melatonin and salt stress design
处理 Treatment | 褪黑素含量 Melatonin content/( | 盐含量 Salt content/(mmol·L | PEG-6000含量 PEG-6000 content/% |
---|---|---|---|
CK | 0 | 0 | 0 |
S1 | 0 | 200 | 0 |
S2 | 50 | 200 | 0 |
S3 | 100 | 200 | 0 |
S4 | 150 | 200 | 0 |
S5 | 200 | 200 | 0 |
S6 | 250 | 200 | 0 |
D1 | 0 | 0 | 20 |
D2 | 50 | 0 | 20 |
D3 | 100 | 0 | 20 |
D4 | 150 | 0 | 20 |
D5 | 200 | 0 | 20 |
D6 | 250 | 0 | 20 |
SD1 | 0 | 200 | 20 |
SD2 | 50 | 200 | 20 |
SD3 | 100 | 200 | 20 |
SD4 | 150 | 200 | 20 |
SD5 | 200 | 200 | 20 |
SD6 | 250 | 200 | 20 |
图1 不同处理下油莎豆种子的萌发特性注:不同小写字母表示不同处理间在P<0.05水平差异显著。
Fig. 1 Germination characteristics of C. esculentus seeds under different treatmentsNote: Different lowercase letters indicate significant differences between different treatments at P<0.05 level.
图2 不同处理下油莎豆幼苗的胚芽长、胚根长及植株干鲜重注:不同小写字母表示不同处理间在P<0.05水平差异显著。
Fig. 2 Germ length, radicle length and plant dry and fresh weight of C. esculentus seedlings under different treatmentsNote: Different lowercase letters indicate significant differences between different treatments at P<0.05 level.
图3 不同处理下油莎豆种子的萌发特性注:不同小写字母表示不同处理间在P<0.05水平差异显著。
Fig. 3 Germination characteristics of C. esculentus seeds under different treatmentsNote: Different lowercase letters indicate significant differences between different treatments at P<0.05 level.
图4 不同处理下油莎豆幼苗的胚芽长、胚根长及植株干鲜重注:不同小写字母表示不同处理间在P<0.05水平差异显著。
Fig. 4 Germ length, radicle length and plant dry and fresh weight of C. esculentus seedlings under different treatmentsNote: Different lowercase letters indicate significant differences between different treatments at P<0.05 level.
图5 不同处理下油莎豆种子的萌发特性注:不同小写字母表示不同处理间在P<0.05水平差异显著。
Fig. 5 Germination characteristics of C. esculentus seeds under different treatmentsNote: Different lowercase letters indicate significant differences between different treatments at P<0.05 level.
图6 不同处理下油莎豆幼苗的胚芽长、胚根长及植株干鲜重注:不同小写字母表示不同处理间在P<0.05水平差异显著。
Fig. 6 Germ length, radicle length and plant dry and fresh weight of C. esculentus seedlings under different treatmentsNote: Different lowercase letters indicate significant differences between different treatments at P<0.05 level.
指标 Index | 盐胁迫+褪黑素S+MT | 旱胁迫+褪黑素D+MT | 盐旱胁迫+褪黑素SD+MT | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
平方和 Sum of squares | 占比 Proportion/% | F值 F value | 平方和 Sum of squares | 占比 Proportion/% | F值 F value | 平方和 Sum of squares | 占比 Proportion/% | F值 F value | |
发芽势 Germination energy | 1 983.33 | 49.88 | 8.19** | 3 600.00 | 27.48 | 14.87** | 1 633.33 | 22.63 | 40.48** |
发芽率 Germination rate | 1 341.67 | 58.57 | 5.54** | 1 908.33 | 41.18 | 7.88** | 8.33 | 0.26 | 0.20 |
发芽指数 Germination index | 299.12 | 47.88 | 90.09** | 309.95 | 46.21 | 93.35** | 38.22 | 5.90 | 69.07** |
活力指数 Vigor index | 11 286.45 | 74.01 | 17.26** | 46 105.51 | 18.12 | 70.50** | 4 907.01 | 7.88 | 45.02** |
胚芽长 Germ length | 364.28 | 32.26 | 238.73** | 763.10 | 67.58 | 500.09** | 1.86 | 0.17 | 7.31** |
胚根长 Radicle length | 225.29 | 24.68 | 137.15** | 686.54 | 75.21 | 417.92** | 1.05 | 0.12 | 3.82 |
植株鲜重 Plant fresh weight | 1.73 | 27.24 | 253.52** | 4.21 | 66.29 | 617.09** | 0.41 | 6.47 | 361.26** |
植株干重 Plant dry weight | 0.032 | 27.59 | 76.06** | 0.077 | 66.38 | 181.23** | 0.007 | 6.03 | 94.99** |
表2 盐旱交叉胁迫对褪黑素处理下油莎豆种子萌发指标影响的方差分析
Table 2 ANOVA analysis of the effect of salt-drought cross-stress on the germination index of C. esculentus seeds under melatonin treatment
指标 Index | 盐胁迫+褪黑素S+MT | 旱胁迫+褪黑素D+MT | 盐旱胁迫+褪黑素SD+MT | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
平方和 Sum of squares | 占比 Proportion/% | F值 F value | 平方和 Sum of squares | 占比 Proportion/% | F值 F value | 平方和 Sum of squares | 占比 Proportion/% | F值 F value | |
发芽势 Germination energy | 1 983.33 | 49.88 | 8.19** | 3 600.00 | 27.48 | 14.87** | 1 633.33 | 22.63 | 40.48** |
发芽率 Germination rate | 1 341.67 | 58.57 | 5.54** | 1 908.33 | 41.18 | 7.88** | 8.33 | 0.26 | 0.20 |
发芽指数 Germination index | 299.12 | 47.88 | 90.09** | 309.95 | 46.21 | 93.35** | 38.22 | 5.90 | 69.07** |
活力指数 Vigor index | 11 286.45 | 74.01 | 17.26** | 46 105.51 | 18.12 | 70.50** | 4 907.01 | 7.88 | 45.02** |
胚芽长 Germ length | 364.28 | 32.26 | 238.73** | 763.10 | 67.58 | 500.09** | 1.86 | 0.17 | 7.31** |
胚根长 Radicle length | 225.29 | 24.68 | 137.15** | 686.54 | 75.21 | 417.92** | 1.05 | 0.12 | 3.82 |
植株鲜重 Plant fresh weight | 1.73 | 27.24 | 253.52** | 4.21 | 66.29 | 617.09** | 0.41 | 6.47 | 361.26** |
植株干重 Plant dry weight | 0.032 | 27.59 | 76.06** | 0.077 | 66.38 | 181.23** | 0.007 | 6.03 | 94.99** |
图7 油莎豆种子和幼苗各项指标的相关性分析注:GP—发芽势;GR—发芽率;GI—发芽指数;VI—活力指数;GL—胚芽长;RL—胚根长;P-FW—植株鲜重;P-DW—植株干重;*、**和***分别表示在P<0.05、P<0.01和P<0.001水平显著相关。
Fig. 7 Correlation analysis of of C. esculentus seeds and seedlings indexesNote: GP—Germination potential; GR—Germination rate; GI—Germination index; VI—Vitality index; GL—Long germ; RL—Radicle long; P-FW—Plant fresh weight; P-DW—Plan dry weight; *, ** and *** indicate significant correlations at P<0.05, P<0.01 and P<0.001 levels, respectively.
处理 Treatment | 因子得分 Factor score | 综合得分 Comprehensive score | 排名 Ranking | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
发芽势GP | 发芽率GR | 发芽指数GI | 活力指数VI | 胚芽长GL | 胚根长RL | 植株鲜重P-FW | 植株干重P-DW | |||
CK | 1.000 | 1.000 | 1.000 | 1.000 | 1.000 | 1.000 | 1.000 | 1.000 | 8.00 | 1 |
SD1 | 6.500 | 6.500 | 6.000 | 6.000 | 6.000 | 6.000 | 5.000 | 6.000 | 48.00 | 6 |
SD2 | 2.000 | 2.000 | 2.000 | 2.000 | 5.000 | 4.000 | 6.000 | 4.000 | 27.00 | 4 |
SD3 | 3.500 | 3.500 | 3.000 | 3.000 | 3.000 | 3.000 | 2.000 | 3.000 | 24.00 | 3 |
SD4 | 3.500 | 3.500 | 4.000 | 4.000 | 2.000 | 2.000 | 3.000 | 2.000 | 24.00 | 2 |
SD5 | 5.000 | 5.000 | 5.000 | 5.000 | 4.000 | 5.000 | 4.000 | 5.000 | 38.00 | 5 |
SD6 | 6.500 | 6.500 | 7.000 | 7.000 | 7.000 | 7.000 | 7.000 | 7.000 | 55.00 | 7 |
表3 油莎豆盐旱胁迫下不同褪黑素处理的综合得分排名
Table 3 Comprehensive score ranking of different melatonin treatments under salt and drought stress in C. esculentus
处理 Treatment | 因子得分 Factor score | 综合得分 Comprehensive score | 排名 Ranking | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
发芽势GP | 发芽率GR | 发芽指数GI | 活力指数VI | 胚芽长GL | 胚根长RL | 植株鲜重P-FW | 植株干重P-DW | |||
CK | 1.000 | 1.000 | 1.000 | 1.000 | 1.000 | 1.000 | 1.000 | 1.000 | 8.00 | 1 |
SD1 | 6.500 | 6.500 | 6.000 | 6.000 | 6.000 | 6.000 | 5.000 | 6.000 | 48.00 | 6 |
SD2 | 2.000 | 2.000 | 2.000 | 2.000 | 5.000 | 4.000 | 6.000 | 4.000 | 27.00 | 4 |
SD3 | 3.500 | 3.500 | 3.000 | 3.000 | 3.000 | 3.000 | 2.000 | 3.000 | 24.00 | 3 |
SD4 | 3.500 | 3.500 | 4.000 | 4.000 | 2.000 | 2.000 | 3.000 | 2.000 | 24.00 | 2 |
SD5 | 5.000 | 5.000 | 5.000 | 5.000 | 4.000 | 5.000 | 4.000 | 5.000 | 38.00 | 5 |
SD6 | 6.500 | 6.500 | 7.000 | 7.000 | 7.000 | 7.000 | 7.000 | 7.000 | 55.00 | 7 |
1 | 王瑞元,王晓松,相海,等.一种多用途的新兴油料作物——油莎豆[J].中国油脂,2019,44(1):1-4. |
2 | 阳振乐.油莎豆的特性及其研究进展[J].北方园艺,2017(17):192-201. |
YANG Z L. Characteristics and research progress of Cyperus esculent [J]. Northern Hortic., 2017(17):192-201. | |
3 | 张喜成,徐长春,宋佳,等.基于遥感DSI的新疆干旱特征分析[J].江苏农业科学,2020,48(2):239-246. |
4 | 朱生堡,乌尔古丽·托尔逊,唐光木,等.新疆盐碱地变化及其治理措施研究进展[J].山东农业科学,2023,55(3):158-165. |
ZHU S B, Tuoerxun Wuerguli, TANG G M, et al.. Research progress on saline-alkali land changes and its treatment measures in Xinjiang [J]. Shandong Agric. Sci., 2023, 55(3):158-165. | |
5 | 杨晓旭,李梦娣,刘大军,等.外源褪黑素对低温胁迫下菜豆种子萌发及抗性的影响[J].中国农学通报,2022,38(33):34-38. |
YANG X X, LI M D, LIU D J, et al.. Exogenous melatonin affects the germination and resistance ability of common bean seeds under chilling stress [J]. Chin. Agric. Sci. Bull., 2022, 38(33):34-38. | |
6 | 雷新慧,万晨茜,陶金才,等.褪黑素与2,4-表油菜素内酯浸种对盐胁迫下荞麦发芽与幼苗生长的促进效应[J].作物学报,2022,48(5):1210-1221. |
LEI X H, WAN C Q, TAO J C, et al.. Effects of soaking seeds with MT and EBR on germination and seedling growth in buckwheat under salt stress [J]. Acta Agron. Sin., 2022, 48(5):1210-1221. | |
7 | ZHANG N, ZHAO B, ZHANG H J, et al.. Melatonin promotes water-stress tolerance, lateral root formation, and seed germination in cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.). [J]. J. Pineal Res., 2013, 54(1):15-23. |
8 | 王明瑶,曹亮,于奇,等.褪黑素浸种对盐碱胁迫下大豆种子萌发的影响[J].作物杂志,2019(6):195-202. |
WANG M Y, CAO L, YU Q, et al.. Effects of melatonin soaking on germination of soybean seeds under saline-alkali stress [J]. Crops, 2019(6):195-202. | |
9 | 王志恒,杨秀柳,邹芳,等.旱盐交叉胁迫对甜高粱种子萌发和生理特性的影响[J].中国农业科技导报,2021,23(2):37-49. |
WANG Z H, YANG X L, ZOU F, et al.. Effects of salt and drought cross stress on germination and physiological characteristics of sweet sorghum seeds [J]. J. Agric. Sci. Technol., 2021, 23(2):37-49. | |
10 | 塔伊尔·买买提江,马亚丽,兰海燕,等.盐旱耦合胁迫对费尔干猪毛菜种子萌发及其幼苗生长的影响[J].干旱区研究,2019,36(4):878-885. |
Maimaitijiang Tayier, MA Y L, LAN H Y, et al.. Effects of salt coupled with drought stress on seed germination and seedling growth of Salsola ferganica [J]. Arid Zone Res., 2019, 36(4):878-885. | |
11 | 余如刚,杜雪玲,陈楚,等.PEG胁迫对三种豆科牧草种子萌发及幼苗生理影响[J].干旱地区农业研究,2012,30(5):99-103. |
YU R G, DU X L, CHEN C, et al.. Effect of PEG stress on seed germination and seeding physiology of three legumes [J]. Agric. Res. Arid Areas, 2012, 30(5):99-103. | |
12 | 张睿,封晓辉,吴玉洁,等.长穗偃麦草(Thinopyrum ponticum)幼苗对盐旱胁迫的生理响应[J].中国生态农业学报, 2022,30(11):1795-1806. |
ZHANG R, FENG X H, WU Y J, et al.. Interactive effects of drought and salt stresses on the growth and physiological characteristics of thinopyrum ponticum [J]. Chin. J. Eco-Agric., 2022, 30(11):1795-1806. | |
13 | 姚海梅,李永生,张同祯,等.旱-盐复合胁迫对玉米种子萌发和生理特性的影响[J].应用生态学报,2016,27(7):2301-2307. |
YAO H M, LI Y S, ZHANG T Z, et al.. Effects of combined drought and salinity stress on germination and physiological characteristics of maize (Zea mays) [J]. Chin. J. Appl. Ecol., 2016, 27(7):2301-2307. | |
14 | 梁龙飞,代胜,孙文涛,等.盐旱交互胁迫对多花黑麦草(Lolium multilorum)种子萌发及胚生长的影响[J].分子植物育种,2020,18(10):3410-3420. |
LIANG L F, DAI S, SUN W T, et al.. Effects of interactions between Ca2+-salt and drought stress on seed germination and embryo growth of Lolium multilorum [J]. Mol. Plant Breeding, 2020, 18(10):3410-3420. | |
15 | 聂必林,巫利梅,如马南木·尼合买提,等.外源褪黑素对复合盐碱胁迫下黑果枸杞种子萌发和幼苗生长的缓解效应[J]. 西北植物学报,2021,41(10):1711-1724. |
NIE B L, WU L M, Nihemaiti Rumananmu, et al.. Alleviating effects of exogenous melatonine on seed germination and seedling growth of Lycium ruthenicum under complex salt-alkali stress [J]. Acta Bot. Bor-Occid. Sin., 2021, 41(10):1711-1724. | |
16 | MENENDEZ-PELAEZ A, POEGGELER B, REITER R J, et al.. Nuclear localization of melatonin in different mammalian tissues: immunocytochemical and radioimmunoassay evidence [J]. J. Cellular Biochem., 1993, 53(4):373-382. |
17 | KOLODZIEJCZY K, IZABEL A, DZITK O, et al.. Exogenous melatonin expediently modifies proteome of maize (Zea mays L.) embryo during seed germination [J]. Acta Physiol. Plant, 2016, 38(6):1-18. |
18 | 赵丽娟,麻冬梅,王文静,等.外源褪黑素对盐胁迫下紫花苜蓿幼苗抗氧化能力以及光合作用效率的影响[J].西北植物学报,2021,41(8):1355-1363. |
ZHAO L J, MA D M, WANG W J, et al.. Effect of exogenous melatonin on antioxidant capacity and photosynthetic efficiency of alfalfa seedling under salt stress [J]. Acta Bot. Bor-Occid. Sin., 2021, 41(8):1355-1363. | |
19 | 董秋丽,王聪聪,郑川,等.褪黑素引发对达乌里胡枝子种子干旱萌发的影响[J].中国草地学报,2022,44(7):114-120. |
DONG Q L, WANG C C, ZHEN C, et al.. Effects of melatonin priming on germination of Lespedezad avurica seeds under drought stress [J]. Chin. J. Grass., 2022, 44(7):114-120. | |
20 | 李平平,张永清,张萌,等.褪黑素浸种对混合盐碱胁迫下藜麦生长及生理的影响[J].江苏农业学,2023,51(4):77-84. |
21 | 陈贤,杨勇,刘凤权,等.植物褪黑素的研究进展[J].江苏农业科学,2020,48(24):17-24. |
22 | 李平,谢淑芹,方璐斌,等.干旱胁迫下不同褪黑素浓度处理下谷子种子萌发特性[J].山西农业大学学报(自然科学版),2022,42(5):76-83. |
LI P, XIE S Q, FANG L B, et al.. Research on the impacts of melatonin at different concentrations on the germination of foxtail millet seeds under drought-stress conditions [J]. J. Shanxi Agric. Univ. (Nat. Sci.), 2022, 42(5):76-83. | |
23 | 赵燕,王东华,赵曦阳,等.植物中褪黑素的研究进展[J].西北植物学报,2014,34(1):196-205. |
ZHAO Y, WANG D H, ZHAO X Y, et al.. Recent advance on the melatonin in plant [J]. Acta Bot. Bor-Occid. Sin., 2014, 34(1):196-205. | |
24 | 李波,郝瑞婷,孙晶,等.植物褪黑素研究进展及未来展望[J].运城学院学报,2021,39(6):1-12. |
LI B, HAO R T, SUN J, et al.. Research progress and future prospects of plant melatonin [J]. J. Yuncheng Univ., 2021, 39(6):1-12. | |
25 | 张珂,李依,厉萌萌,等.外源褪黑素对镉胁迫下小麦幼苗生长生理特征及镉含量的影响[J].轻工学报,2022,37(4):111-117. |
ZHANG K, LI Y, LI M M, et al.. Effects of exogenous melatonin on growth and physiological characteristics and Cd content of wheat seedling under Cd stresses [J]. J. Light Ind., 2022, 37(4):111-117. | |
26 | LYU Y, PAN J J, WANG H P, et al.. Melatonin inhibits seed germination by crosstalk with abscisic acid, gibberellin, and auxin in Arabidopsis [J/OL]. J. Pineal Res., 2021, 70(4): e12736 [2023-03-15]. . |
27 | REITER R J, MAYO J C, TAN D X, et al.. Melatonin as an antioxidant: under promises but over delivers [J]. J. Pineal Res., 2016, 61(3):253-278. |
[1] | 魏茜雅, 林欣琪, 梁腊梅, 秦中维, 李映志. 褪黑素引发对干旱胁迫下辣椒种子萌发和幼苗生长的影响[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2024, 26(4): 46-57. |
[2] | 张景云, 关峰, 石博, 万新建. 小麦根系分泌物对苦瓜幼苗生长及土壤生物学环境的影响[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2024, 26(2): 181-190. |
[3] | 单莉莉. 孕穗期低温对水稻叶片生理、产量的影响及外源褪黑素缓解效应[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2023, 25(9): 23-33. |
[4] | 周影, 李京咏, 戴林秀, 敖弟彩, 李梓逸, 杨帆, 顾军伟, 徐强, 窦志, 高辉. 稻虾共作模式下喷施褪黑素对水稻产量形成和抗倒伏特性的影响[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2023, 25(9): 34-42. |
[5] | 钟鹏, 苗丽丽, 王建丽, 刘杰, 王晓龙. 油莎豆种质资源低温胁迫生理响应与耐寒性评价[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2023, 25(9): 83-96. |
[6] | 梁培鑫, 唐榕, 刘建国. 混合盐碱胁迫对油莎豆光合生理及产量的影响[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2023, 25(12): 195-204. |
[7] | 彭欣, 冯璨, 马香, 李宏, 唐燕琼, 李娟娟, 刘柱. 产酸性蛋白酶深红沙雷氏菌的筛选及其在种子萌发中的应用[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2022, 24(9): 88-95. |
[8] | 钟鹏, 苗丽丽, 刘杰, 王建丽, 陆海燕, 于洪久, 张楠. 种植密度和方式对油莎豆群体结构和产量的影响[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2022, 24(3): 186-196. |
[9] | 张胜珍, 马艳芝. 氯化钙对盐胁迫下荆芥种子萌发及幼苗生理特性的影响 [J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2021, 23(7): 65-71. |
[10] | 王志恒,杨秀柳,邹芳,黄思麒,周吴艳,徐中伟,魏玉清*. 旱盐交叉胁迫对甜高粱种子萌发和生理特性的影响[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2021, 23(2): 37-49. |
[11] | 王志恒,黄思麒,邹芳,杨秀柳,魏玉清*. 温度与NaCl处理对甜高粱种子萌发及幼苗抗氧化酶活性的影响[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2020, 22(9): 42-51. |
[12] | 张嘉雯,卢绍浩,赵喆,赵铭钦*. 外源褪黑素对低温胁迫下烟草幼苗生理指标的影响[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2020, 22(9): 78-86. |
[13] | 邹芳,杨秀柳,黄思麒,王志恒,魏玉清*. 外源亚精胺对干旱胁迫下甜高粱幼苗生长及生理生化指标的影响[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2020, 22(4): 44-52. |
[14] | 杨颖1,王月林2,闫晶秋子1,李钢铁1*. 盐胁迫对刺榆种子萌发及幼苗生理特征的影响[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2020, 22(4): 53-60. |
[15] | 贺嘉豪1,陈建中2,徐坚强3,向金友4,杨懿德4,张学伟5,宁尚辉3,王林6,刘园7,杨洋4,景延秋1*,程玉渊7*. 外源褪黑素对烟草幼苗抗旱性生理机制的影响[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2020, 22(2): 50-57. |
阅读次数 | ||||||
全文 |
|
|||||
摘要 |
|
|||||