Genetic Diversity Analysis of Different Characteristics of Sweetpotato Varieties by ISSR Molecular Marker

doi:10.13304/j.nykjdb.2021.0078

Abstract

Abstract:

To broaden the genetic background and screen the excellent parents of sweetpotato cultivars， the genetic diversity of 37 sweetpotato from China were assessed by ISSR markers in this study. The results indicated that 19 highly efficient amplification primers were selected from 100 primers， and 118 of the total 115 bands amplified showed polymorphisms. The mean frequency of polymorphism was 97.50%. The genetic distance among the 37 varieties floated from 0.04 to 0.36. The genetic distance between Taishu 66 and Hongdong was the smallest （0.04）. Ziluolan （ornamental type） and Xuzishu 8 （anthocyanin process type） were clustered in the same group. Anthocyanin process type had the largest genetic distance to vegetable and fruit type （0.43 and 0.40， respectively）， which was the smallest nearest （0.08） to ornamental type. The fruit type was far from other types （>0.30）， however， the genetic distance between edible type and other types showed the opposite trend. The genetic relationships of different sweetpotato varieties were analyzed in this study. Related to these morphological markers，these 37 germplasm accessions could be clarified by ISSR. The molecular markers showed advantage in analysis of the genetic relationship among sweetpotato germplasm resources of different types. These results could provide reference for parents’ selection of varieties for different purposes.

Key words: sweetpotato, germplasm, ISSR marker, genetic diversity

摘要：

为了丰富甘薯育成品种的遗传背景，筛选优良亲本，对来自全国各地的37份不同类型（鲜食型，淀粉型和兼用型等）的甘薯品种进行遗传多样性分析，选取的品种在薯皮、薯肉颜色方面有较大差异，采用ISSR分子标记对其多样性及亲缘关系进行分析。结果表明：100条引物中共筛选出19条ISSR多态性引物，共扩增出118条带，其中多态性条带115条，多态性位点频率为97.50%，供试甘薯品种的遗传距离介于0.04~0.36之间。台薯66和红东的遗传距离最近（0.04），观赏型甘薯紫罗兰与花青素加工型徐紫薯8号聚为一类。花青素加工型与菜用型和水果型的遗传距离较远，分别为0.43和0.40，与观赏型遗传关系最近（0.08）；水果型与其他8种类型遗传距离较远，均大于0.30，而鲜食型与其他类型的遗传距离均较近。分析了不同类型甘薯品种的遗传关系，相对于形态学标记，ISSR能较好地区分37份甘薯种质资源，其聚类分析结果能更客观地反映不同甘薯类型之间的遗传关系，可为不同用途品种选育的亲本选配提供参考。

关键词: 甘薯, 种质资源, ISSR标记, 遗传多样性

CLC Number:

S531

Chenke CUI, Tao LIN, Yanbo AN, Peng CUI. Genetic Diversity Analysis of Different Characteristics of Sweetpotato Varieties by ISSR Molecular Marker[J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2022, 24(5): 68-75.

崔晨珂, 林涛, 安艳波, 崔鹏. 不同类型甘薯品种遗传多样性的ISSR分析[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2022, 24(5): 68-75.

Figures/Tables 6

References 21

1	刘中华,林志坚,李华伟,等.甘薯种质资源遗传多样性的ISSR分析[J].南方农业学报, 2019, 50(11): 2392-2400.
	LIU Z H, LING Z J, LI H W, et al.. Genetic diversity analysis of sweetpotato [Ipomoea batatas (L.) Lam.] by ISSR molecular markers [J]. J. Southern Agric., 2019, 50(11): 2392-2400.
2	刘桂玲,张鹏,郑建利,等.不同类型甘薯品种主要经济性状和营养成分差异[J].中国粮油学报, 2012, 27(2): 10-13.
	LIU G L, ZHANG P, ZHENG J L, et al.. Variation in major economic traits and nutrition composition among different types of sweet potato cultivars [J]. J. Chin. Cereal Oil Ass., 2012, 27(2): 10-13.
3	苏一钧,董玲霞,王娇,等. 菜用和观赏甘薯种质资源遗传多样性分析[J].植物遗传资源学报, 2018, 19(1): 57-64.
	SU Y J, DONG L X, W J, et al.. Genetic diversity in vegetable and ornamental sweetpotato germplasm [J]. J. Plant Genet. Resour., 2018, 19(1): 57-64.
4	李强,刘庆昌,翟红,等.中国甘薯主要亲本遗传多样性的ISSR分析[J].作物学报, 2008, 34(6): 972-977.
	LI Q, LIU Q C, ZHAI H, et al.. Genetic diversity in main parents of sweet potato in China as revealed by ISSR marker [J]. Acta Agron. Sin., 2008, 34(6): 972-977.
5	WADL P A, OLUKOLU B A, BRANHAM S E, et al.. Genetic diversity and population structure of the USDA sweetpotato (Ipomoea batatas) germplasm collections using GBSpoly [J]. Front. Plant Sci., 2018, 9: 1-13.
6	YADA B, BROWN-GUEDIRA G, ALAJO A, et al.. Simple sequence repeat marker analysis of genetic diversity among progeny of a biparental mapping population of sweetpotato [J]. Hortscience, 2015, 50(8): 1143-1147.
7	WANG Z Y, LI J, LUO Z X, et al.. Characterization and development of EST-derived SSR markers in cultivated sweetpotato (Ipomoea batatas) [J/OL]. BMC Plant Biol., 2011, 11(1):139 [2021-02-26]. .
8	刘中华,林志坚,李华伟,等.基于SRAP标记的甘薯遗传多样性与起源演化分析[J].植物遗传资源学报, 2018, 19(3): 468-477.
	LIU Z H, LIN Z J, LI W H, et al. The genetic diversity, origin and evolution of sweetpotato (Ipomoea batatas (L.) Lam.) revealed by SRAP markers [J]. J. Plant Genet. Resour., 2018, 19(3): 468-477.
9	季志仙,王美兴,范宏环,等.基于ISSR指纹的甘薯食用品种的遗传多样性分析[J].核农学报, 2014, 28(7): 1197-1202.
	JI Z X, WANG M X, FAN H H, et al.. Genetic diversity assessment of edible sweetpotato germplasm based on ISSR fingerprint [J]. Acta Agric. Nucl. Sin., 2014, 28(7): 1197-1202.
10	张凯,罗小敏,蒋玉春,等.甘薯种质资源的SRAP鉴定及遗传多样性分析[J].核农学报,2013, 27(5): 0568-0575.
	ZHANG K, LUO X M, JIANG Y C, et al.. Genetic diversity among main sweetpotato germplasm resources using SRAP markers[J]. Acta Agric. Nucl. Sin., 2013, 27(5): 568-575.
11	聂立圆,李爱贤,秦桢,等.基于SSR标记的132份甘薯种质指纹图谱的构建及遗传多样性分析[J].植物遗传资源学报, 2018, 19(5): 904-911.
	NIE L Y, LI A X, QIN Z, et al.. Construction of DNA fingerprints and analysis of genetic diversity based on SSR markers for 132 sweetpotato germplasms [J]. J. Plant Genet. Resour., 2018, 19(5): 904-911.
12	HUANG J C, SUN M. Genetic diversity and relationships of sweetpotato and its wild relatives in Ipomoea series Batatas (Convolvulaceae) as revealed by inter-simple sequence repeat (ISSR) and restriction analysis of chloroplast DNA [J]. Theor. Appl. Genet., 2000, 100(7): 1050-1060
13	崔鹏,李波,吴月燕,等.南方鲜食葡萄品种遗传多样性的ISSR分析[J].核农学报, 2013, 27(9): 1270-1275.
	CUI P, LI B, WU Y Y, et al. Genetic diversity of table grape varieties in southern China by ISSR markers [J]. Acta Agric. Nucl. Sin., 2013, 27(9): 1270-1275.
14	刘桂玲,张鹏,郑建利,等.不同类型甘薯品种主要经济性状和营养成分差异[J].中国粮油学报, 2012, 27(2): 10-13.
	LIU G L, ZHANG P, ZHENG J L, et al.. Variation in major economic traits and nutrition composition among different types of sweet potato cultivars [J]. J. Chin. Cereals Oils Assoc., 2012, 27(2): 10-13.
15	谢子玉,王可尔,赵雯靓,等.不同肉色甘薯的营养成分与生物活性[J].浙江农业学报, 2021, 33(2): 183-192.
	XIE Z Y, WANG K E, ZHAO W L, et al.. Nutritional components and bioactivities of sweet potatoes with different flesh colors [J]. Acta Agric. Zhejiangensis, 2021, 33(2): 183-192.
16	贺学勤,刘庆昌,翟红,等.用RAPD、ISSR和AFLP 标记分析系谱关系明确的甘薯品种的亲缘关系[J].作物学报, 2005, 31(10): 1300-1304.
	HE X Q, LIU Q C, ZHAI H, et al.. The use of RAPD, ISSR and AFLP markers for analyzing genetic relationships among sweetpotato cultivars with known origin [J]. Acta Agron. Sin., 2005, 31(10): 1300-1304.
17	赵冬兰,唐君,曹清河,等.中国甘薯地方种质资源遗传多样性分析[J].植物遗传资源学报, 2015, 16(5): 994-1003.
	ZHAO D L, TANG J, CAO Q H, et al.. Analysis of genetic diversity of sweetpotato landraces in China [J]. J. Plant Genet. Resour., 2015, 16(5): 994-1003.
18	罗凯,卢会翔,吴正丹,等.中国西南地区甘薯主要育种亲本的遗传多样性及群体结构分析[J].中国农业科学, 2016, 49(3): 593-608.
	LUO K, LU H X, WU Z D, et al. Genetic diversity and population Structure Analysis of Main Sweet Potato Breeding Parents in Southwest China [J]. Sci. Agric. Sin., 2016, 49(3): 593-608.
19	赵路宽,苏一钧,戴习彬,等.中国甘薯登记品种SSR标记遗传多样性分析[J].西北植物学报, 2019, 39(7): 1212-1220.
	ZHAO L K, SU Y J, DAI X B, et al.. Genetic diversity of the registered swetpotato varieties in China by SSR markers [J]. Acta Bot. Bor-Occid. Sin., 2019, 39(7): 1212-1220.
20	贺学勤,刘庆昌,王玉萍,等.中国甘薯地方品种的遗传多样性分析[J].中国农业科学, 2005, 38(2): 250-257.
	HE X Q, LIU Q C, WANG Y P, et al.. Analysis of genetic diversity of sweetpotato landraces in China [J]. Sci. Agric. Sin., 2005, 38(2): 250-257.
21	张道微,董芳,黄艳岚,等.甘薯种质资源花青素积累的遗传多态性分析[J].植物遗传资源学报, 2019, 20(2): 347-358.
	ZHANG D W, DONG F, HUANG Y L, et al.. Genetic diversity analysis of anthocyanin accumulation in sweetpotato germplasm resources [J]. J. Plant Genet. Resour., 2019, 20(2): 347-358.

引物 Primer	引物碱基序列 Sequence of primer	扩增总带数 Total band number	多态性条带数 Polymorphic band number	多态性位点频率 Frequency of polymorphic band/%
UBC808	（AG）₈C	6	6	100
UBC809	（AG）₈C	7	7	100
UBC811	（GA）₈C	5	4	80
UBC812	（GA）₈A	7	7	100
UBC818	（CA）₈G	6	6	100
UBC819	（GT）₈A	7	7	100
UBC820	（GT）₈C	6	6	100
UBC821	（GT）₈T	3	3	100
UBC823	（TC）₈C	7	7	100
UBC827	（AC）₈G	6	6	100
UBC829	（TG）₈C	7	7	100
UBC830	（TG）₈G	7	7	100
UBC836	（AG）₈YA	5	5	100
UBC841	（GA）₈YC	7	7	100
UBC842	（GA）₈YG	6	5	83
UBC846	（CA）₈RT	6	6	100
UBC847	（CA）₈RC	7	7	100
UBC848	（CA）₈RG	5	4	80
UBC850	（GT）₈YC	8	8	100
总计Total		118	115	97.5

引物 Primer	引物碱基序列 Sequence of primer	扩增总带数 Total band number	多态性条带数 Polymorphic band number	多态性位点频率 Frequency of polymorphic band/%
UBC808	（AG）₈C	6	6	100
UBC809	（AG）₈C	7	7	100
UBC811	（GA）₈C	5	4	80
UBC812	（GA）₈A	7	7	100
UBC818	（CA）₈G	6	6	100
UBC819	（GT）₈A	7	7	100
UBC820	（GT）₈C	6	6	100
UBC821	（GT）₈T	3	3	100
UBC823	（TC）₈C	7	7	100
UBC827	（AC）₈G	6	6	100
UBC829	（TG）₈C	7	7	100
UBC830	（TG）₈G	7	7	100
UBC836	（AG）₈YA	5	5	100
UBC841	（GA）₈YC	7	7	100
UBC842	（GA）₈YG	6	5	83
UBC846	（CA）₈RT	6	6	100
UBC847	（CA）₈RC	7	7	100
UBC848	（CA）₈RG	5	4	80
UBC850	（GT）₈YC	8	8	100
总计Total		118	115	97.5

品种特点 Characteristics	薯脯加工型 Preserved pulp	淀粉型 Starch	鲜食型 Edible	食、饲兼用型 Edible and feed	菜用型Vegetable	水果型 Fruit	花青素加工型 Anthocyanin	鲜食、淀粉兼用型 Edible and starch	观赏型 Ornamental
薯脯加工型 Preserved pulp	0.041
淀粉型 Starch	0.358	0.104
鲜食型 Edible	0.305	0.338	0.183
食、饲兼用型 Edible and feed	0.309	0.237	0.285	0.110
菜用型 Vegetable	0.396	0.256	0.346	0.289	—
水果型 Fruit	0.351	0.358	0.368	0.346	0.312	0.199
花青素加工型 Anthocyanin	0.296	0.243	0.311	0.281	0.434	0.401	—
鲜食、淀粉兼用 Edible and starch	0.306	0.342	0.313	0.326	0.261	0.300	0.370	0.071
观赏型 Ornamental	0.28	0.255	0.290	0.209	0.379	0.297	0.077	0.345	—

品种特点 Characteristics	薯脯加工型 Preserved pulp	淀粉型 Starch	鲜食型 Edible	食、饲兼用型 Edible and feed	菜用型Vegetable	水果型 Fruit	花青素加工型 Anthocyanin	鲜食、淀粉兼用型 Edible and starch	观赏型 Ornamental
薯脯加工型 Preserved pulp	0.041
淀粉型 Starch	0.358	0.104
鲜食型 Edible	0.305	0.338	0.183
食、饲兼用型 Edible and feed	0.309	0.237	0.285	0.110
菜用型 Vegetable	0.396	0.256	0.346	0.289	—
水果型 Fruit	0.351	0.358	0.368	0.346	0.312	0.199
花青素加工型 Anthocyanin	0.296	0.243	0.311	0.281	0.434	0.401	—
鲜食、淀粉兼用 Edible and starch	0.306	0.342	0.313	0.326	0.261	0.300	0.370	0.071
观赏型 Ornamental	0.28	0.255	0.290	0.209	0.379	0.297	0.077	0.345	—

[1]	Liuxi YI, Rula SA, Xin FAN, Can ZHAO, Ru LI, Bateer SIQIN. Evaluation of Flax Germplasm Phenotype [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2022, 24(5): 56-67.
[2]	Xixi ZUO, Yingjie SONG, Xinyan MA, Yunhui YANG, Yifei WANG, Zeguang GUO, Xiongzhi ZHU, Yue LIU. Mining SSR Loci and Analysis the Genetic Diversity of Tartary Buckwheat Based on the Whole Genome Sequence [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2022, 24(4): 38-51.
[3]	Tao ZHANG, Haiyun SONG, Peng HE, Yuanrong WEI, Peng XU, Qiujin TAN, Shufang ZHENG, Zhenshi QIN, Yuming LU, Wenlin WANG. Analysis and Evaluation of Amino Acid Composition in Different Macadamiaternifolia Germplasm [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2022, 24(1): 119-127.
[4]	YU Haitian, LYU Meiyuan, WAN Shuwei, YANG Feng, HU Chaoqin, YANG Xin, ZHANG Xiaoyan, WANG Yubao, HE Chunhua, LIN Deming, WANG Liping. Genetic Diversity Analysis of Indian Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) Resources and Screening of Excellent Germplasm [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2021, 23(7): 54-64.
[5]	WANG Ping. The Main Problems and Countermeasures of Seed Industry Development in China [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2021, 23(11): 7-16.
[6]	LI Danyang, SUN Lingwei, WU Caifeng, ZHANG Shushan, ZHANG Defu, DAI Jianjun. SSR Genetic Diversity Analysis of Yangtze River Delta White Goats from Conservation Populations [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2021, 23(10): 74-81.
[7]	XIANG Jishan1, ZHANG Hengru2, LIU Han1, SUO Liangxi2, JIA Shujing1, ZHANG Ying1, SHI Jingqi1, HU Lizhe1, CAI Yining1. Comparison of Phenotypic Traits of Foxtail Millet Germplasm Resources in Different Ecological Regions [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2020, 22(9): 31-41.
[8]	SHI Yutao1, ZHENG Shulin1, WANG Feiquan1, CHEN Rongbing1, LI Yuanhua1, ZHANG Bo1, WANG Han2, LIN Li2. Characteristics Analysis of Mineral Element Contents in Wuyi Mingcong Tea Plant Germplasm Resources [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2020, 22(7): 37-50.
[9]	LI Jichao, ZHANG Jinyu, YANG Tianmei, YANG Meiquan, YANG Weize, XU Zongliang, ZUO Yingmei*. Comprehensive Evaluation and Physiological Mechanism of Drought Resistance of Paris polyphylla Smith var. yunnanensis (Franch.) Hand.-Mazz Germplasm Resources [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2020, 22(10): 49-59.
[10]	WANG Feiquan1, FENG Hua1, LUO Shengcai2, CHEN Rongbing1, YANG Huizhu1, LI Shaohua1, ZHNAG Jianming3, ZHANG Bo1, YE Jianghua1. Diversity Analysis of Agronomic Traits of Wuyi Mingcong Tea Plant Germplasm Resources [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2019, 21(6): 43-54.
[11]	XU Meiling1, HE Xiaohui2, SONG Yuchuan2, FAN Youyin2, LI Yongping1. Correlation Analysis of Routine Chemical Components, Polyphenol and Sensory Quality of Cigar Germplasm Resources [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2019, 21(6): 124-134.
[12]	FENG Bin, LI Huilin, YANG Shengxian, LIN Tao, WEI Zhongfen*. Analysis of Genetic Diversity of Sunflower Germpasm Resources in Guizhou [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2018, 20(7): 34-41.
[13]	WANG Xiangdong1, WANG Yongcun1, MA Yanzhi2*, SONG Yushuang2,3, FU Lijun1, LI Jiayao2. Application of ISSR in Genetic Diversity Analysis of Zingiber officinale Rosc.#br# [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2018, 20(7): 42-47.
[14]	YUAN Yuanyuan1, CHANG Fang2, CAO Xiaohui1, ZHANG Yibo1, ZHANG Rongting1, LI Sishen3*. Identification of Potassium Efficiency in Wheat and Screening of Germplasms with High Potassium Use Efficiency [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2018, 20(6): 1-10.
[15]	WANG Xue1, FAN Junpeng1, LI Haitao2, SHI Lei1,2, CAI Hongmei1, XU Fangsen1,2, LIU Kede2, DING Guangda1* . Effects of Phosphorus Deficiency on Seed Yield and Quality of A Brassica napus Natural Population [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2018, 20(2): 93-100.