Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology ›› 2023, Vol. 25 ›› Issue (6): 40-49.DOI: 10.13304/j.nykjdb.2021.0818
• BIOTECHNOLOGY & LIFE SCIENCE • Previous Articles Next Articles
Shuang WANG(), Yixing HOU, Linjiao FENG, Qianqian LU, Long ZHOU(
)
Received:
2021-09-18
Accepted:
2021-12-09
Online:
2023-06-01
Published:
2023-07-28
Contact:
Long ZHOU
通讯作者:
周龙
作者简介:
王爽 E-mail: 756547132@qq.com;
基金资助:
CLC Number:
Shuang WANG, Yixing HOU, Linjiao FENG, Qianqian LU, Long ZHOU. Effect of Drought Stress on Anatomical Structure of Leaves in Table Grape Varieties[J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2023, 25(6): 40-49.
王爽, 侯毅兴, 冯琳骄, 卢倩倩, 周龙. 干旱胁迫对鲜食葡萄叶片解剖结构的影响[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2023, 25(6): 40-49.
品种名称 Variety name | 亲本 Parentage | 选育单位 Selection unit | 种类 Species |
---|---|---|---|
深红玫瑰 Crimson Rose | 不详 Unknown | 不详 Unknown | 不详 Unknown |
浪漫红颜 Wagamichi | 阳光玫瑰×魏可 Shine Muscat×Weike | 日本志村葡萄研究所 Shimura Grape Research Institute, Japan | 欧美杂交种 European-American hybrid grapes |
丝路红玫瑰 Silk Road Red Rose | 不详 Unknown | 不详 Unknown | 不详 Unknown |
阳光玫瑰 Shine Muscat | 安芸津21×白南 Akitsu-21×Hakunan | 日本果树试验场 Fruit Tree Laboratory, Japan | 欧美杂交种 European-American hybrid grapes |
黑脆无核Blackcrunchy Seedless | 不详 Unknown | 不详 Unknown | 不详 Unknown |
火焰无核 Flame Seedless | (绯红×无核白)×[(红马拉加×Tafafihi Ahmer)×(白玫瑰×无核白)](Cardinal×Centenial Seedless)×[(Red Malaga×Tafafihi Ahmer)×(Rosa Rugosa×Centenial Seedless)] | 美国FRESNO园艺试验站FRESNO Gardening Experimental Station, America | 欧亚种 Eurasian grape |
夏黑 Summer Black | 巨峰×二倍体无核白 Kyoho×Centenial seedless diploid | 日本山梨县果树试验场 Fruit Tree Experimental Field in Yamori County, Japan | 欧亚种 Eurasian grape |
户太8号 Hutai 8 | 奥林匹亚芽变 Kyogei×Kyoho | 西安葡萄研究所 Grape Research Institute, Xi’an | 欧美杂交种 European-American hybrid grapes |
紫甜无核 Zitian Seedless | 皇家秋天×牛奶 Autumn royal seedless×Milk | 河北省昌黎县李绍星葡萄育种研究所 Li Shaoxing Grape Breeding Institute, Changli county, Hebei province | 欧亚种 Eurasian grape |
甜蜜蓝宝石 Sweet Sapphire | 不详 Unknown | 美国加州 California | 不详 Unknown |
Table 1 Basic information of the tested varieties
品种名称 Variety name | 亲本 Parentage | 选育单位 Selection unit | 种类 Species |
---|---|---|---|
深红玫瑰 Crimson Rose | 不详 Unknown | 不详 Unknown | 不详 Unknown |
浪漫红颜 Wagamichi | 阳光玫瑰×魏可 Shine Muscat×Weike | 日本志村葡萄研究所 Shimura Grape Research Institute, Japan | 欧美杂交种 European-American hybrid grapes |
丝路红玫瑰 Silk Road Red Rose | 不详 Unknown | 不详 Unknown | 不详 Unknown |
阳光玫瑰 Shine Muscat | 安芸津21×白南 Akitsu-21×Hakunan | 日本果树试验场 Fruit Tree Laboratory, Japan | 欧美杂交种 European-American hybrid grapes |
黑脆无核Blackcrunchy Seedless | 不详 Unknown | 不详 Unknown | 不详 Unknown |
火焰无核 Flame Seedless | (绯红×无核白)×[(红马拉加×Tafafihi Ahmer)×(白玫瑰×无核白)](Cardinal×Centenial Seedless)×[(Red Malaga×Tafafihi Ahmer)×(Rosa Rugosa×Centenial Seedless)] | 美国FRESNO园艺试验站FRESNO Gardening Experimental Station, America | 欧亚种 Eurasian grape |
夏黑 Summer Black | 巨峰×二倍体无核白 Kyoho×Centenial seedless diploid | 日本山梨县果树试验场 Fruit Tree Experimental Field in Yamori County, Japan | 欧亚种 Eurasian grape |
户太8号 Hutai 8 | 奥林匹亚芽变 Kyogei×Kyoho | 西安葡萄研究所 Grape Research Institute, Xi’an | 欧美杂交种 European-American hybrid grapes |
紫甜无核 Zitian Seedless | 皇家秋天×牛奶 Autumn royal seedless×Milk | 河北省昌黎县李绍星葡萄育种研究所 Li Shaoxing Grape Breeding Institute, Changli county, Hebei province | 欧亚种 Eurasian grape |
甜蜜蓝宝石 Sweet Sapphire | 不详 Unknown | 美国加州 California | 不详 Unknown |
处理 Treatment | 深红 玫瑰 Crimson Rose | 浪漫 红颜 Wagamichi | 丝路 红玫瑰 Silk Road Red Rose | 阳光 玫瑰 Shine Muscat | 黑脆 无核 Blackcruncy Seedless | 火焰 无核 Flame Seedless | 夏黑 Summer Black | 户太 8号 Hutai 8 | 紫甜 无核 Zitian Seedless | 甜蜜 蓝宝石 Sweet Sapphire |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CK | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
H1 | 0.00 | 2.67 | 5.67 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 8.00 | 3.67 |
H2 | 8.33 | 19.67 | 28.00 | 5.33 | 0.00 | 11.33 | 14.67 | 13.33 | 29.33 | 21.33 |
H3 | 26.67 | 46.67 | 66.67 | 11.33 | 6.67 | 28.00 | 36.67 | 33.33 | 70.67 | 56.00 |
Table 2 Drought damage indices of 10 grape varieties under different levels of drought stress
处理 Treatment | 深红 玫瑰 Crimson Rose | 浪漫 红颜 Wagamichi | 丝路 红玫瑰 Silk Road Red Rose | 阳光 玫瑰 Shine Muscat | 黑脆 无核 Blackcruncy Seedless | 火焰 无核 Flame Seedless | 夏黑 Summer Black | 户太 8号 Hutai 8 | 紫甜 无核 Zitian Seedless | 甜蜜 蓝宝石 Sweet Sapphire |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CK | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
H1 | 0.00 | 2.67 | 5.67 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 8.00 | 3.67 |
H2 | 8.33 | 19.67 | 28.00 | 5.33 | 0.00 | 11.33 | 14.67 | 13.33 | 29.33 | 21.33 |
H3 | 26.67 | 46.67 | 66.67 | 11.33 | 6.67 | 28.00 | 36.67 | 33.33 | 70.67 | 56.00 |
品种Cultivar | 胁迫天数 Stress days | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 d | 4 d | 8 d | 12 d | 15 d | |
深红玫瑰Crimson Rose | 87.84±0.90 a | 77.36±1.39 abc | 68.99±2.88 bc | 60.23±1.58 b | 51.09±2.92 b |
浪漫红颜Wagamichi | 85.06±1.31 a | 73.26±1.97 bc | 61.00±0.50 d | 52.19±2.71 c | 42.22±2.62 c |
丝路红玫瑰Silk Road Red Rose | 87.65±2.23 a | 76.13±1.46 abc | 69.67±1.37 abc | 51.35±2.23 c | 41.33±1.36 c |
阳光玫瑰Shine Muscat | 85.31±0.99 a | 78.83±1.92 ab | 72.99±0.48 ab | 66.16±2.54 a | 60.17±2.25 a |
黑脆无核Blackcrunchy Seedless | 83.28±2.30 a | 81.47±2.63 a | 75.88±2.73 a | 68.31±2.21 a | 62.60±1.90 a |
火焰无核Flame Seedless | 86.68±2.60 a | 75.72±2.68 abc | 68.17±2.35 bc | 58.01±2.75 b | 48.43±0.96 b |
夏黑Summer Black | 85.89±1.47 a | 77.24±0.97 abc | 69.54±1.14 abc | 60.12±0.74 b | 47.53±1.21 b |
户太8号Hutai 8 | 87.05±0.90 a | 76.00±2.31 abc | 68.73±2.78 bc | 59.57±1.64 b | 48.47±2.05 b |
紫甜无核Zitian Seedless | 89.51±1.19 a | 75.38±1.13 bc | 61.75±0.59 d | 45.61±1.78 c | 38.54±2.00 c |
甜蜜蓝宝石Sweet Sapphire | 85.09±2.03 a | 72.85±2.29 bc | 63.10±3.03 cd | 48.49±2.84 cd | 40.71±3.04 c |
Table 3 Changes in the relative water content of leaves of 10 grape varieties under drought stress
品种Cultivar | 胁迫天数 Stress days | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 d | 4 d | 8 d | 12 d | 15 d | |
深红玫瑰Crimson Rose | 87.84±0.90 a | 77.36±1.39 abc | 68.99±2.88 bc | 60.23±1.58 b | 51.09±2.92 b |
浪漫红颜Wagamichi | 85.06±1.31 a | 73.26±1.97 bc | 61.00±0.50 d | 52.19±2.71 c | 42.22±2.62 c |
丝路红玫瑰Silk Road Red Rose | 87.65±2.23 a | 76.13±1.46 abc | 69.67±1.37 abc | 51.35±2.23 c | 41.33±1.36 c |
阳光玫瑰Shine Muscat | 85.31±0.99 a | 78.83±1.92 ab | 72.99±0.48 ab | 66.16±2.54 a | 60.17±2.25 a |
黑脆无核Blackcrunchy Seedless | 83.28±2.30 a | 81.47±2.63 a | 75.88±2.73 a | 68.31±2.21 a | 62.60±1.90 a |
火焰无核Flame Seedless | 86.68±2.60 a | 75.72±2.68 abc | 68.17±2.35 bc | 58.01±2.75 b | 48.43±0.96 b |
夏黑Summer Black | 85.89±1.47 a | 77.24±0.97 abc | 69.54±1.14 abc | 60.12±0.74 b | 47.53±1.21 b |
户太8号Hutai 8 | 87.05±0.90 a | 76.00±2.31 abc | 68.73±2.78 bc | 59.57±1.64 b | 48.47±2.05 b |
紫甜无核Zitian Seedless | 89.51±1.19 a | 75.38±1.13 bc | 61.75±0.59 d | 45.61±1.78 c | 38.54±2.00 c |
甜蜜蓝宝石Sweet Sapphire | 85.09±2.03 a | 72.85±2.29 bc | 63.10±3.03 cd | 48.49±2.84 cd | 40.71±3.04 c |
Fig. 1 Changes of leaf anatomical structure of 10 grape varieties under drought stressNote: 1—Upper epidermis cell;2—Palisade tissue; 3—Spongy tissue;4—Lower epidermis cell.
品种 Cultivar | 上表皮厚度TUE | 栅栏组织厚度TP | 栅海比P/S | 海绵组织厚度TS | 下表皮厚度TLE | 叶片厚度TL | 细胞紧实度CTR | 细胞疏松度SR | 茎节 长度 SL | 茎节 粗度 SD | 叶片 长度 LL | 叶片宽度LW | 新梢 长度 NSL |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
深红玫瑰Crimson Rose | 1.05 | 1.10 | 1.04 | 1.34 | 1.12 | 1.07 | 0.82 | 0.98 | 1.32 | 1.36 | 1.43 | 1.38 | 1.16 |
浪漫红颜Wagamichi | 0.93 | 0.76 | 0.76 | 1.05 | 0.91 | 1.09 | 0.87 | 1.17 | 0.85 | 0.88 | 0.94 | 0.92 | 0.93 |
丝路红玫瑰 Silk Road Red Rose | 0.95 | 0.83 | 0.91 | 0.85 | 0.88 | 0.90 | 0.85 | 1.21 | 0.89 | 0.83 | 0.90 | 0.84 | 0.81 |
阳光玫瑰 Shine Muscat | 1.37 | 1.37 | 1.14 | 1.34 | 1.24 | 1.06 | 1.16 | 0.93 | 1.24 | 1.17 | 1.30 | 1.45 | 1.25 |
黑脆无核 Blackcrunchy Seedless | 1.40 | 1.28 | 1.12 | 1.33 | 1.28 | 1.36 | 1.09 | 0.97 | 1.31 | 1.25 | 1.32 | 1.40 | 1.48 |
火焰无核 Flame Seedless | 1.48 | 0.97 | 0.90 | 1.09 | 0.81 | 1.05 | 0.93 | 1.04 | 0.77 | 0.78 | 1.00 | 0.93 | 0.98 |
夏黑 Summer Black | 0.95 | 0.82 | 0.79 | 1.19 | 0.86 | 1.04 | 0.79 | 1.15 | 1.36 | 1.24 | 1.43 | 1.54 | 1.26 |
户太8号 Hutai 8 | 0.88 | 0.87 | 0.94 | 0.93 | 1.00 | 0.95 | 1.15 | 0.98 | 1.45 | 1.37 | 1.48 | 1.29 | 1.05 |
紫甜无核 Zitian Seedless | 0.92 | 0.81 | 0.84 | 0.90 | 0.84 | 0.91 | 0.83 | 1.26 | 0.84 | 0.86 | 0.81 | 0.83 | 0.86 |
甜蜜蓝宝石 Sweet Sapphire | 0.84 | 1.00 | 0.80 | 1.03 | 0.88 | 0.85 | 0.82 | 1.22 | 0.83 | 0.84 | 0.89 | 0.82 | 0.87 |
平均数 Average | 1.08 | 0.98 | 0.92 | 1.11 | 0.99 | 1.03 | 0.93 | 1.09 | 1.08 | 1.06 | 1.15 | 1.14 | 1.06 |
Table 4 Drought resistance coefficients of 10 drought resistance-related traits of grapes
品种 Cultivar | 上表皮厚度TUE | 栅栏组织厚度TP | 栅海比P/S | 海绵组织厚度TS | 下表皮厚度TLE | 叶片厚度TL | 细胞紧实度CTR | 细胞疏松度SR | 茎节 长度 SL | 茎节 粗度 SD | 叶片 长度 LL | 叶片宽度LW | 新梢 长度 NSL |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
深红玫瑰Crimson Rose | 1.05 | 1.10 | 1.04 | 1.34 | 1.12 | 1.07 | 0.82 | 0.98 | 1.32 | 1.36 | 1.43 | 1.38 | 1.16 |
浪漫红颜Wagamichi | 0.93 | 0.76 | 0.76 | 1.05 | 0.91 | 1.09 | 0.87 | 1.17 | 0.85 | 0.88 | 0.94 | 0.92 | 0.93 |
丝路红玫瑰 Silk Road Red Rose | 0.95 | 0.83 | 0.91 | 0.85 | 0.88 | 0.90 | 0.85 | 1.21 | 0.89 | 0.83 | 0.90 | 0.84 | 0.81 |
阳光玫瑰 Shine Muscat | 1.37 | 1.37 | 1.14 | 1.34 | 1.24 | 1.06 | 1.16 | 0.93 | 1.24 | 1.17 | 1.30 | 1.45 | 1.25 |
黑脆无核 Blackcrunchy Seedless | 1.40 | 1.28 | 1.12 | 1.33 | 1.28 | 1.36 | 1.09 | 0.97 | 1.31 | 1.25 | 1.32 | 1.40 | 1.48 |
火焰无核 Flame Seedless | 1.48 | 0.97 | 0.90 | 1.09 | 0.81 | 1.05 | 0.93 | 1.04 | 0.77 | 0.78 | 1.00 | 0.93 | 0.98 |
夏黑 Summer Black | 0.95 | 0.82 | 0.79 | 1.19 | 0.86 | 1.04 | 0.79 | 1.15 | 1.36 | 1.24 | 1.43 | 1.54 | 1.26 |
户太8号 Hutai 8 | 0.88 | 0.87 | 0.94 | 0.93 | 1.00 | 0.95 | 1.15 | 0.98 | 1.45 | 1.37 | 1.48 | 1.29 | 1.05 |
紫甜无核 Zitian Seedless | 0.92 | 0.81 | 0.84 | 0.90 | 0.84 | 0.91 | 0.83 | 1.26 | 0.84 | 0.86 | 0.81 | 0.83 | 0.86 |
甜蜜蓝宝石 Sweet Sapphire | 0.84 | 1.00 | 0.80 | 1.03 | 0.88 | 0.85 | 0.82 | 1.22 | 0.83 | 0.84 | 0.89 | 0.82 | 0.87 |
平均数 Average | 1.08 | 0.98 | 0.92 | 1.11 | 0.99 | 1.03 | 0.93 | 1.09 | 1.08 | 1.06 | 1.15 | 1.14 | 1.06 |
指标 Index | 主成分1 Principal component 1 | 主成分2 Principal component 2 | 主成分3 Principal component 3 |
---|---|---|---|
上表皮厚度TUE | 0.61 | 0.68 | 0.12 |
栅栏组织厚度TP | 0.81 | 0.43 | -0.08 |
栅海比P/S | 0.85 | 0.29 | -0.27 |
海绵组织厚度TS | 0.84 | 0.11 | 0.42 |
下表皮厚度TLE | 0.90 | 0.14 | -0.13 |
叶片厚度TL | 0.75 | 0.25 | 0.42 |
细胞紧实度CTR | 0.68 | 0.19 | -0.61 |
细胞疏松度SR | -0.91 | -0.06 | 0.22 |
茎节长度SL | 0.78 | -0.61 | -0.10 |
茎节粗度SD | 0.79 | -0.59 | -0.07 |
叶片长度LL | 0.81 | -0.55 | -0.02 |
叶片宽度LW | 0.87 | -0.42 | 0.15 |
新梢长度NSL | 0.93 | -0.08 | 0.30 |
叶片相对含水量RWCL | 0.96 | 0.24 | 0.02 |
特征值Eigenvalues | 9.54 | 2.11 | 1.01 |
贡献率Contribution rate/% | 68.15 | 15.08 | 7.21 |
累积贡献率Accumulative contribution rate/% | 68.15 | 83.24 | 90.44 |
Table 5 Load matrix of each component
指标 Index | 主成分1 Principal component 1 | 主成分2 Principal component 2 | 主成分3 Principal component 3 |
---|---|---|---|
上表皮厚度TUE | 0.61 | 0.68 | 0.12 |
栅栏组织厚度TP | 0.81 | 0.43 | -0.08 |
栅海比P/S | 0.85 | 0.29 | -0.27 |
海绵组织厚度TS | 0.84 | 0.11 | 0.42 |
下表皮厚度TLE | 0.90 | 0.14 | -0.13 |
叶片厚度TL | 0.75 | 0.25 | 0.42 |
细胞紧实度CTR | 0.68 | 0.19 | -0.61 |
细胞疏松度SR | -0.91 | -0.06 | 0.22 |
茎节长度SL | 0.78 | -0.61 | -0.10 |
茎节粗度SD | 0.79 | -0.59 | -0.07 |
叶片长度LL | 0.81 | -0.55 | -0.02 |
叶片宽度LW | 0.87 | -0.42 | 0.15 |
新梢长度NSL | 0.93 | -0.08 | 0.30 |
叶片相对含水量RWCL | 0.96 | 0.24 | 0.02 |
特征值Eigenvalues | 9.54 | 2.11 | 1.01 |
贡献率Contribution rate/% | 68.15 | 15.08 | 7.21 |
累积贡献率Accumulative contribution rate/% | 68.15 | 83.24 | 90.44 |
品种 Cultivar | 隶属函数Subordinate function value | D值 D value | 排名 Rank | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
U1 | U2 | U3 | |||
深红玫瑰 Crimson Rose | 0.69 | 0.31 | 0.73 | 0.63 | 3 |
浪漫红颜 Wagamichi | 0.15 | 0.59 | 0.75 | 0.27 | 7 |
丝路红玫瑰 Silk Road Red Rose | 0.06 | 0.62 | 0.37 | 0.18 | 9 |
阳光玫瑰 Shine Muscat | 0.91 | 0.81 | 0.31 | 0.84 | 2 |
黑脆无核 Blackcrunchy Seedless | 1.00 | 0.81 | 0.73 | 0.95 | 1 |
火焰无核 Flame Seedless | 0.31 | 1.00 | 0.64 | 0.45 | 4 |
户太8号 Hutai 8 | 0.46 | 0.00 | 1.00 | 0.43 | 5 |
夏黑 Summer Black | 0.55 | 0.06 | 0.00 | 0.42 | 6 |
甜蜜蓝宝石 Sweet Sapphire | 0.00 | 0.59 | 0.53 | 0.14 | 10 |
紫甜无核 Zitian Seedless | 0.06 | 0.61 | 0.54 | 0.19 | 8 |
权重Weights | 0.75 | 0.17 | 0.08 |
Table 6 Drought resistance membership function values and comprehensive evaluation values of 10 grape varieties
品种 Cultivar | 隶属函数Subordinate function value | D值 D value | 排名 Rank | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
U1 | U2 | U3 | |||
深红玫瑰 Crimson Rose | 0.69 | 0.31 | 0.73 | 0.63 | 3 |
浪漫红颜 Wagamichi | 0.15 | 0.59 | 0.75 | 0.27 | 7 |
丝路红玫瑰 Silk Road Red Rose | 0.06 | 0.62 | 0.37 | 0.18 | 9 |
阳光玫瑰 Shine Muscat | 0.91 | 0.81 | 0.31 | 0.84 | 2 |
黑脆无核 Blackcrunchy Seedless | 1.00 | 0.81 | 0.73 | 0.95 | 1 |
火焰无核 Flame Seedless | 0.31 | 1.00 | 0.64 | 0.45 | 4 |
户太8号 Hutai 8 | 0.46 | 0.00 | 1.00 | 0.43 | 5 |
夏黑 Summer Black | 0.55 | 0.06 | 0.00 | 0.42 | 6 |
甜蜜蓝宝石 Sweet Sapphire | 0.00 | 0.59 | 0.53 | 0.14 | 10 |
紫甜无核 Zitian Seedless | 0.06 | 0.61 | 0.54 | 0.19 | 8 |
权重Weights | 0.75 | 0.17 | 0.08 |
1 | 贺普超.葡萄学[M].北京:中国农业出版社,1992:5-9. |
2 | 张山清,普宗朝,李新建,等.气候变化对新疆苹果种植气候适宜性的影响[J].中国农业资源与区划,2018,39(8):255-264. |
ZHANG S Q, PU Z C, LI X J, et al.. Impact of climate change on apple-planting climatic suitability in Xinjiang [J]. Chin. J. Agric. Resour. Regional Plan., 2018, 39(8): 255-264. | |
3 | 郭燕,张树航,李颖,等.中国板栗238份品种(系)叶片形态、解剖结构及其抗旱性评价[J].园艺学报,2020,47(6):1033-1046. |
GUO Y, ZHNAG S H, LI Y, et al.. Studies on the leaf morphology, anatomical structure and drought resistance evaluation of 238 Chinese chestnut varieties (strains) [J]. Acta Hortic. Sin., 2020, 47(6): 1033-1046. | |
4 | 白重炎,高尚风,张颖,等.12个核桃品种叶片解剖结构及其抗旱性研究[J].西北农业学报,2010,19(7):125-128. |
BAI C Y, GAO S F, ZHANG Y, et al.. Analysis of anatomical leaf structure and drought resistance in 12 varieties of walnut [J]. Acta Agric. Bor-occid. Sin., 2010, 19(7): 125-128. | |
5 | 王树森,孟凡旭,赵波,等.大青山阳坡五种灌木叶片解剖结构及其抗旱性研究[J].中国农业科技导报,2020,22(1):38-44. |
WANG S S, MENG F X, ZHAO B, et al.. Leaf anatomic structure of five shrubs and its effects on drought tolerance in sunny slope of Daqing mountain [J]. J. Agric. Sci. Technol., 2020, 22(1): 38-44. | |
6 | 王延秀,贾旭梅,石晓昀,等.三种苹果砧木应对干旱胁迫的超微及解剖结构响应特性[J].植物生理学报,2018,54(4):594-606. |
WANG Y X, JIA X M, SHI X Y, et al.. The response characteristics of the ultrastructure and anatomical structure of three apple rootstocks under drought stress [J]. Plant Physiol. J., 2018, 54(4): 594-606. | |
7 | 孙志超,程慧,郭文磊,等.山核桃枝叶耐旱特性分析[J].果树学报,2015,32(4):633-640. |
SUN Z C, CHENG H, GUO W L, et al.. Analysis of drought resistance of branch and leaf structure in Carya cathayensis [J]. J. Fruit Sci., 2015, 32(4): 633-640. | |
8 | 潘学军,张文娥,杨秀永,等.喀斯特山区野生葡萄实生苗叶片解剖结构与抗旱性的关系[J].贵州农业科学,2010,38(9):176-178, 182. |
PAN X J, ZHANG W E, YANG X Y, et al.. Correlation between drought resistance and leaf anatomical structure of wild vitis quinquangularis seedlings in Karst mountainous areas [J]. Guizhou Agric. Sci., 2010, 38(9): 176-178, 182. | |
9 | 苏来曼·艾则孜,王勇,骆强伟,等.无核葡萄抗旱性鉴定[J].西北园艺(综合),2017(1):50-53. |
10 | 张星,张剑侠.葡萄砧木杂种的抗旱性评价[J].中国果树,2020(5):59-64, 70. |
ZHANG X, ZHANG J X. Evaluation of drought resistance of grape rootstock hybrids [J]. China Fruits, 2020(5): 59-64, 70. | |
11 | 韩晓,王海波,王孝娣,等.不同砧木对‘87-1’葡萄光合特性及荧光特性的影响[J].中国农业科学,2018,51(10):1972-1981. |
HAN X, WANG H B, WANG X D, et al.. Effects of different rootstocks on ‘87-1’ grape photosynthetic and chlorophyll fluorescence characteristics [J]. Sci. Agric. Sin., 2018, 51(10): 1972-1981. | |
12 | 邬燕,刘志华,刘钊.PEG模拟干旱胁迫下4种葡萄生理指标的变化及其抗旱性评价[J].分子植物育种,2020,18(4):1319-1325. |
WU Y, LIU Z H, LIU Z. Changes of physiological indexes and drought resistance evaluation of 4 grapes variety under PEG simulated drought stress [J]. Mol. Plant Breed., 2020, 18(4): 1319-1325. | |
13 | 李晶,李华,王华.不同生育期水分亏缺对‘赤霞珠’耗水及果实品质的影响[J].西北农业学报,2018,27(5):727-734. |
LI J, LI H, WANG H. Effect of deficit at different growthstage on water consumption and fruit quality of Vitis vinifera cv. ‘Cabernet Sauvignon’ [J]. Acta Agric. Bor-Occid. Sin., 2018, 27(5): 727-734. | |
14 | 赵秀明,王飞,韩明玉,等.新引进苹果矮化中间砧木的抗旱性评价[J].干旱地区农业研究,2012,30(4):105-112. |
ZHAO X M, WANG F, HAN M Y, et al.. Evaluation on drought resistance of introduced cultivars of apple dwarf rootstocks [J]. Agric. Res. Arid Areas, 2012, 30(4): 105-112. | |
15 | 由佳辉,高林,王海鸥,等.干旱胁迫对9个葡萄砧木品种生理指标的影响[J].经济林研究,2020,38(3):180-189. |
YOU J H, GAO L, WANG H O, et al.. Effects of drought stress on physiological indexes of nine grape rootstock varieties [J] Non-wood For. Res., 2020, 38(3): 180-189. | |
16 | 温国,孙皓浦,党江波,等.多倍体与二倍体枇杷叶片特征及抗旱性初步分析[J].果树学报,2019,36(8):968-979. |
WEN G, SUN H P, DANG J B, et al.. A preliminary study on leaf characteristics and drought resistance of polyploid and diploid loquat [J]. J. Fruit Sci., 2019, 36(8): 968-979. | |
17 | 马文涛,樊卫国.贵州野生柑橘的抗旱性及其活性氧代谢对干旱胁迫的响应[J].果树学报,2014,31(3):394-400. |
MA W T, FAN W G. Drought resistance and response of active oxygen metabolism of wild citrus seedlings of Guizhou under drought stress [J]. J. Fruit Sci., 2014, 31(3): 394-400. | |
18 | 赖小连,颜玉娟,颜立红,等.干旱胁迫对黄檀幼苗生长及生理特性的影响[J].东北林业大学学报,2020,48(7):1-6. |
LAI X L, YAN Y J, YAN L H, et al.. Effects of drought stress on growth and physiological characteristics of Dalbergia hupeana seedlings [J]. J. Northeast For. Univ., 2020, 48(7): 1-6. | |
19 | 陈德朝,邹玉和,鄢武先,等.干旱胁迫对治沙植物形态结构和生理特征的影响[J].四川林业科技,2018,39(6):81-85. |
CHEN D C, ZOU Y H, YAN W X, et al.. Effects of drought stress on ecological structure and physiological characteristics of sand-control plants [J]. J. Sichuan For. Sci. Technol., 2018, 39(6): 81-85. | |
20 | 樊卫国,李迎春.部分梨砧木的叶片组织结构与抗旱性的关系[J].果树学报,2008,25(1):17-21. |
FAN W G, LI Y C. Study on the relationship between lamina anatomical structure and drought resistance of pear rootstocks [J]. J. Fruit Sci., 2008, 25(1): 17-21. | |
21 | 莫言玲,郑俊鶱,杨瑞平,等.不同西瓜基因型对干旱胁迫的生理响应及其抗旱性评价[J].应用生态学报,2016,27(6):1942-1952. |
MO Y L, ZHENG J X, YANG R P, et al.. Physiological responses and tolerance to drought stress of different watermelon genotypes [J]. Chin. J. Appl. Ecol., 2016, 27(6): 1942-1952. | |
22 | 王勇,李玉玲,骆强伟,等.6个葡萄品种(系)抗旱性比较研究[J].中国农学通报,2014,30(19):219-222. |
WANG Y, LI Y L, LUO Q W, et al.. Comparative study on drought resistance of six grape varieties (Lines) [J]. Chin. Agric. Sci. Bull., 2014, 30(19): 219-222. | |
23 | 陈文荣,曾玮玮,李云霞,等.高丛蓝莓对干旱胁迫的生理响应及其抗旱性综合评价[J].园艺学报,2012,39(4):637-646. |
CHEN W R, ZENG W W, LI Y X, et al.. The physiological responds of highbush blueberry to drought stress and the comprehensive evaluation on their drought resistance capacity [J]. Acta Hortic. Sin., 2012, 39(4): 637-646. | |
24 | 李敏敏,袁军伟,韩斌,等.26个葡萄砧木品种耐旱性评价[J].西北林学院学报,2018,33(4):132-138. |
LI M M, YUAN J W, HAN B, et al.. Evaluations on the drought resisance of 26 grape rootstocks [J]. J. Northwest For.Univ., 2018, 33(4): 132-138. | |
25 | 孟庆杰,王光全,董绍锋,等.桃叶片组织解剖结构特征与其抗旱性关系的研究[J].干旱地区农业研究,2004,22(3):123-126. |
MENG Q J, WANG G Q, DONG S F, et al.. Relation between leaf tissue parameters and drought resistance of peaches [J]. Agric. Res. Arid Areas, 2004, 22(3): 123-126. | |
26 | 翟晓巧,任媛媛,刘艳萍,等.8种落叶乔木抗旱性相关叶片的解剖结构[J].东北林业大学学报,2013,41(9):42-45. |
ZHAI X Q, REN Y Y, LIU Y P, et al.. Drought resistance of eight deciduous trees and anatomical structure of leaves [J]. J. Northeast For. Univ., 2013, 41(9): 42-45. | |
27 | 潘昕,邱权,李吉跃,等.基于叶片解剖结构对青藏高原25种灌木的抗旱性评价[J].华南农业大学学报,2015,36(2):61-68. |
PAN X, QIU Q, LI J Y, et al.. Drought resistance evaluation based on leaf anatomical structures of 25 shrubs on the Tibetan Plateau [J]. J. South Chin. Agric. Univ., 2015, 36(2): 61-68. | |
28 | 薛智德,韩蕊莲,侯庆春,等.延安地区5种灌木叶旱性结构的解剖研究[J].西北植物学报,2004,24(7):1200-1206. |
XUE Z D, HAN R L, HOU Q C, et al.. Anatomical study of xeromorphism of leaves in cutting for five brushes in Yanʾan region [J]. Acta Bot. Bor-Occid. Sin., 2004, 24(7): 1200-1206. | |
29 | 木巴热克·阿尤普,艾沙江·买买提,郭春苗,等.基于叶片显微及亚显微结构的新疆扁桃10个主栽品种抗旱性综合评价[J].果树学报,2019,36(3):347-358. |
Ayoupu Mubareke, Maimaiti Aishajiang, GUO C M, et al.. Comprehensive evaluation of drought resistance of 10 main cultivars of almond (Amygdalus communis L.) in Xinjiang by means of leaf microstructure and ultrastructure [J]. J. Fruit Sci., 2019, 36(3): 347-358. | |
30 | 陈绍莉,郭修武.葡萄砧木抗旱性的叶片解剖学研究[J].北方果树,2008(5):5-7. |
CHEN S L, GUO X W. The study of leave anatomy on grape rootstock drought-tolerance [J]. Northern Fruits, 2008(5): 5-7. |
[1] | Shulin ZHENG, Yutao SHI, Feiquan WANG, Bangqiang WU, Yuanhua LI, Bo ZHANG, Naixing YE. Analysis and Comprehensive Evaluation of Content of Mineral Elements in Flowers of Different Tea Germplasm Resources [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2023, 25(4): 178-188. |
[2] | Shengwei GUO, Siwen BIAN, Jianwen DING, Xiaochen ZHANG, Xing YANG, Jin DU, Chunyang XIANG. Comprehensive Evaluation of Low Temperature Tolerance of Waxy Maize Varieties at Germination Stage [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2023, 25(2): 38-47. |
[3] | Guanqun CHAI, Guihua LIU, Wei ZHOU, Xiujin ZHANG, Longpin LI, Chengwu FAN. Evaluation of Pollution Risk and Source Analysis of Heavy Metals in Greenhouse Soils in Wumeng Mountain Area, Guizhou Province [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2022, 24(8): 144-153. |
[4] | Qing LU, Ting LIANG, Weiwei WANG, Dezhou WANG, Xian WU, Xiaoyan WANG, Yimiao TANG. Cloning and Expression Analysis of Wheat Heat Shock Protein Gene TaHSP90-1 [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2022, 24(8): 44-54. |
[5] | Xiaxia LI, Siyu ZHANG, Zhihui CHENG. Regional Trial Evaluation of High Quality Garlic Cultivars of China [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2022, 24(7): 58-68. |
[6] | Lili WANG, Congpei YIN, Feng LI, Zhimin YANG, Fangming LIU, Baisong LIN, Xiaojing LIU, Haijun LIU, Jing SUN, Dongdong SHAN, Jianghui CUI, Zhenqing ZHANG. Microbial Community Structure of Potato Rhizosphere Soil and Its Response to Drought Stress [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2022, 24(6): 58-69. |
[7] | Fangling WANG, Mingyue ZHANG, Yaru ZHOU, Qinglin GUAN, Xinyan LI, Qiu ZHONG, Mingqin ZHAO. Effect of TS-PAA Water Retaining Agent on Growth and Photosynthetic Characteristics of Cigar under Drought Stress [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2022, 24(4): 162-172. |
[8] | Jiangyan LI, Xianhua ZHANG, Xiaoqiang YUAN. Drought Resistance Index Screening and Drought Resistance Evaluation of Dactylisglomerata Germplasm Resources During Seedling [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2022, 24(3): 84-94. |
[9] | Xiaochun SUN, Wenjing HUANG, Bo LI. Effects of Exogenous Salicylic Acid on Physiological and Biochemical Indexes and Related Gene Expression in Platycodongrandiflorus Under Drought Stress [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2022, 24(1): 63-70. |
[10] | LI Junjie, DU Pufang, SHI Tingrui, HOU Peijia, CHAI Xinyu, ZHAO Rui, WANG Yu, LI Hongxia. LI Junjie, DU Pufang, SHI Tingrui, HOU Peijia, CHAI Xinyu, ZHAO Rui, WANG Yu, LI Hongxia* [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2021, 23(7): 21-32. |
[11] | LIU Yuan, ZHANG Xiuyan, XU Miaoyun, ZHENG Hongyan, ZOU Junjie, ZHANG Lan, WANG Lei. Global Small RNA Transcriptome Profiling of Rice Under Drought Stress [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2021, 23(6): 23-32. |
[12] | HU Yang, LI Gangtie, LI Xing, JIA Shouyi. Growth and Physiological Index of Tamarix leptostachys Bunge Seedlings Under Soil Drought Stress [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2021, 23(6): 43-50. |
[13] | ZHANG Haoyang, JIN Yinan, SUN Yanxin, LI Ziwei, GUO Xiaoheng, XU Zicheng*. Research Progress of Plant microRNAs in Drought Stress Response [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2021, 23(4): 27-36. |
[14] | SUN Yan, HAN Bin, YUAN Junwei, LIU Changjiang, LI Minmin, YIN Yonggang, JIA Nan, GUO Zijuan, ZHAO Shengjian*. Difference Analysis of Morphology, Structure and Physiological Characteristics in Roots of Grapevines with Different Cold Resistance [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2021, 23(4): 47-57. |
[15] | WANG Deyun1,2, LIU Peipei1, CHEN Yunting1, XU Yueying1, ZHOU Li1, LUO Guangming1*. Effect of Drought Stress on Endogenous Hormone Content of Gardenia jasminoides Ellis [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2021, 23(4): 58-63. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||